Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Orthodontic appliances are being refined with passage of
time. This refinement has reduced the physical effort put forth
in treatment, but does not eliminate the need for an
orthodontist to think, understand & apply basic principles of
biomechanics in a common sense manner.
MECHANICAL CONCEPTS OF ORTHODONTICS
1. Centre of Resistance
C. Res. is the balance point of a body (tooth), where a
single force would produce translation.
C. Res. is dependent on the root length & morphology,
the number of roots, the level of alveolar bone support.
2. Center of Rotation
The point around which
rotation occurs, when an object is
moved
1
3. Force
Force is defined as the action of one body on another
body that
tends to change the shape on motion of the other body. It is a
vector quantity with magnitude, direction and sense.
Resolution of force implies breaking it into one or more parts,
each part called a component of that force. Resultant is a sum
of two or more vectors. The vector sum of all components of a
force must always be equal to the resultant.
2
moment/ free vectors/ applied moments. Magnitude of this
moment is equal to the magnitude of one of the forces x
perpendicular distance between them.
Force Systems
A. Planar/ Coplanar
B. Concurrent/ Non concurrent
C. Determinate/ Indeterminate
D. Consistent/ Inconsistent
Planar- all forces acting on a body lie in one plane
Coplanar- forces do not act in the same plane.
Concurrent- forces involved have magnitude, direction
&sense. All forces act at a common point.
3
Non-Concurrent- forces must have magnitude, direction, sense
as well as location. This force system is commonly used in
Orthodontics.
Determinate- moments and forces can be readily discerned,
measured & evaluated.
Indeterminate - too complex to precisely
determine all moments &forces involved
in equilibrium.
Consistent – is the one in which moment
of a force delivered by a ‘straight wire’ is
in the same direction of C.Rot.
4
Recommended procedure for any desired tooth movement is
Problem identification
Required direction & C.Rot.
Necessary force system for this C.R.
Equilibrium state of the force system
Appliance selection
Activation
5
brackets –a lingual force on the I premolar & a buccal force on
the II premolar. So, now if a loop design is planned to correct
this step relationship, the teeth appear to be aligned, but
actually the entire segment has rotated positively. Hence, the
correct method to correct such step relationship is first correct
the II premolar from an anchored molar (TPA/ lingual arch)
and then to correct the I premolar
from a normally aligned II premolar and I molar.
6
COMMON SENSE MECHANICS
No appliance exists which will allow an orthodontist to
treat orthodontic problems with adding the necessary
ingredient of ‘common sense’ to the mechanics instituted for
correcting the malocclusion. Regardless of how well we
understand the mechanics and how much the appliance is
refined, we are dealing with an biologic environment, whose
variation in response will continue to challenge the
orthodontist. If we are to meet this challenge, we must gather
much information as possible that will allow us to treat the
patient in a practical or realistic manner rather than treating in
a textbook fashion.
Example
In the above figure, an archwire is inserted into the
molar tube and lies in the mucobuccal fold prior to incisor
7
brackets. Now it is concluded that there is an anterior intrusive
force on engagement. Similarly, if the archwire is first
engaged in the anterior brackets, it appears that the molar
receives an intrusive force, but it is not so. i.e., visual
inspection provides a greater degree of accuracy and
simplicity, but the degree of error is much higher.
Mulligan’s Concepts
1. Minimal banding
2. No extra oral force
3. No lingual attachments
4. No consideration of wire sizes used
5. Use of round wires for retraction
6. Use of continuous arch wires
7. Activation done intraorally.
Mulligan’s concepts apply regardless of the slot sizes
chosen by the clinician or the interbracket span involved. So,
there is no need to alter the appliance of choice.
V” Bend Principle
Consider a “v” bend in the arch wire. This bend in the
arch wire can be centered / off-centered
8
Rule For an Off –Centered Bend
“Long segment will point in the direction of the force
produced on the tooth that receives the long segment”
“Short segment points in the opposite direction of force
produced on the tooth that receives the short segment”
9
Cue Ball Concept
10
As the load moves to the end of the board, the critical
moment becomes a maximum.
Static Equilibrium
11
Example
12
Clinical Application of the Above Concepts
Intrusion of the anteriors - use round wires
Cross bite correction
Molar Distalisation
Molar control
Extraction mechanics
-Cuspid retraction
-Cuspid & bicuspid retraction
-Molar protraction
Pure Cantilever
Using tip back bend and diving board concept. If we
bypass the canines and bicuspids during overbite correction
and use a molar tip back bend, then we have in effect created a
diving board – ‘a true cantilever system. As seen, as distance
doubles, deflection also doubles, resulting in a net force of
one-fourth.
Force + distance = same deflection.
13
i.e., as length of wire segment increases, forces decrease.
This in turn decreases anterior intrusive forces, & hence molar
extrusive forces too decrease.
Non-Cantilever
No more pure force, but there is a combination of forces
& moments - “VERY ADVANTAGEOUS FOR
ORTHODONTIST ” - As forces are light, but also well defined
14
we can see that the long segment points apically in the incisor
area and hence indicates an incisor intrusive force and a molar
extrusive force.
Moments
When the wire is brought down from the mucobuccal fold
for insertion into the incisor brackets, the force acts at a
perpendicular distance from the center of resistance of the
molar. This produces a distal crown thrust or a mesial root
torque on the molars involved. Again, when the wire is
engaged into the incisor brackets, the intrusive force passes
labial to the C.R. of the incisors. This produces a smaller
moment compared to that in the molars.
Differential Torque
When the arch wire is engaged in the bracket slots, we
have significantly different magnitude of torque- referred to as
‘differential torque’. If the arch wire is not tied back to the
molar tubes, the anterior and posterior moments may be
permitted to respond independent of each other. However, if
the wire is tied back, the system behaves as a single unit and a
‘tug of war’ is apparent with molar having the mechanical
advantage with the larger moment.
15
Again, that is not all that is taking place. Look at the
distal aspect of molar with cue ball concept in mind. If the
arch wire does not fill the slot, the extrusive force on the
molar acts buccal to the C.R. this force times distance results
in molar lingual crown torque. This torque is not dependent on
the use of rectangular wire. However, if the wire is rigidly
attached to the tubes, the applied force passes lingual to the
C.R., inducing buccal crown torque instead.
16
Anchor bend produces similar arch wire deflection in the
bracket slot, but mainly generates a force and almost nil
moment. This is due to the large vertical dimension of the slot
and a very small area of contact with the lock pin’s head.
Therefore ‘v’ bend principle does not hold good in a vertical
dimension for Begg brackets. An anchor bend in the Begg
appliance produces a moment plus vertical force on the molar
and only a vertical force on the canines.
If the long segment from the tip back bend maintains the
same angular relationship as the long segments from the
incisor torque bend, the vertical forces cancel each other.
Therefore, no overbite correction occurs even though we might
expect it. The extrusive component of force caused by the
anterior lingual torque must be considered.
17
However, if the lingual root torque produces a greater
angle relative to arch wire level, it will
determine the net force –an intrusive
force on molars and an
extrusive force on incisors. Therefore,
if we hope for overbite correction, the
bite deepens.
18
Arch Leveling
With a full strap up, intrusive forces acting at the molar
tube produces buccal crown torque on the molars- “posterior
teeth move buccally for no apparent reason during arch
leveling.”
Cross bite
19
horizontal dimension. Common sense – whenever we observe a
buccal segment in cross bite, are we really observing an
unilateral cross bite or are we witnessing a bilateral cross bite
with lateral mandibular shift.
Tipping
The use of overlays applies heavy force at crown level.
The term ‘overlay’- refers to a heavy wire overlaying the main
archwire. It can either be inserted into the headgear tube or
designed with terminal hooks to engage the arch wire.
20
side becomes buccoverted when the cross bite is corrected.
However, the normal side relapses to its normal position,
while the cross bite relapses to the point of improved function-
‘hopefully’ maintained in this position.
But, common sense tells us that not all the cross bites
maintain normal position when corrected. If the tooth relapses,
the expander may be reinserted and reexpanded.
Bodily Movement
If bodily movement is desired, a rectangular wire may be
placed to provide the necessary torque at the root level. The
buccal root torque is incorporated in the arch wire to produce
bodily movement. However, always keep in mind, ‘crown
movement precedes root movement’. Therefore crowns
initially move lingually – in the opposite direction of our
intention. The overlay enables to overcome this initial reaction
by providing necessary force at the crown level.
21
- Labial force can also be reciprocated to the other three
incisors, rather than banding the molars.
Proper loop design must be achieved to produce rapid
movement. Triangular loop is much better than the vertical
loop as activation for cross bite correction involves torsion of
the wire along a broad base, whereas the vertical loop involves
the same torsion along a very ‘narrow’ base, resulting in less
deflective qualities and easy permanent deformation. ‘Use of
triangular loops is restricted to the labiolingual movements,
vertical loops can be best utilized for twisting /rotational
movements along the long axis of the tooth”. In the latter
condition, torsion occurs along the legs of the loop, thus
improving deflection qualities and reducing the likelihood of
permanent deformation.
22
Class III malocclusion
Anterior cross bite with buccal cross bite – indicates a
skeletal problem and should be ideally treated with
surgery. But treatment can be done as a compromised
orthodontic therapy.
23
Above figure is a case of class III with lower anterior
collapse and atypical cl. III profile. Treatment started as non-
extraction with maxillary expansion with class III elastics.
Only a 0.036” overlay is used to correct and maintain buccal
cross bite. Maxillary incisors are advanced by a push coil
spring to create space for the unerupted cuspid. “Mandibular
molars move distally very readily in a dental/ skeletal class III
malocclusion”. “Do not align the mandibular incisors till
overbite is achieved”. These corrections are achieved only by
a 2x 4 appliance and overlay arch. Bends are then placed distal
to mandibular lateral incisors to produce lingual movement of
the lower molars. (Always use a heavier wire-0.020”-because
minimal banding reduces force magnitude. And heavy forces
are accepted during horizontal movements). Even one year
after appliance removal the overbite maintains itself and
would be a mistake to align lower incisors if the cross bite
relapses.
24
Additional arch length by molar uprighting can be
credited to treatment planning, if the patients are still growing
vertically, but a big ‘zero’ to non-growing patients.
Differential torque
If an anterior lingual root torque
is applied without a tip back bend,
there is a tendency for the maxillary
teeth to move forward.
25
In this figure the unerupted II
molars have not only impacted but were
pushed back and even the cuspids and
bicuspids have tipped back.
26
Class II elastics tend to tip the occlusal plane downward.
Use of tip back bend in upper arch only, does the opposite and
thereby permits the use of cl.II elastics in such cases without
affecting the upper occlusal plane.
Molar Control
When using loop free mechanics, bends can be placed
anywhere between tubes/ brackets, creating a wire-bracket
angles at adjacent brackets. This affords the choice of various
force systems and an opportunity to produce direct response.
1. Center bend
It is equivalent to two off centered bends with
short sections bent in same direction.
2. Step bend
27
It is a combination of two off centered bends with short
sections bent in opposite direction and parallel to each other
28
posterior arch width and a reduction in the normal curve of
Monson when viewed from a frontal aspect.
29
in an area of rigidity. This rigidity can be produced by an
overlay on the anterior segment.
Step Bends
Whenever 2 bends are involved & each bend produces
forces in the same direction, then we are dealing with a step
bend
30
Placement of step bends increases the force magnitudes –
produces 4 times as much as force as a single cantilever of
same inter-bracket distance. This is mainly used when
clinician wishes to use higher force magnitudes and is d one
after placement of toe in / out the arch wires after placement
of step bends are known as “Force driven appliances”
Center Bend
This can also be considered a variation of an off centered
bend. A centered bend / gable bend can be modified to become
two off centered bends & produce similar moments in opposite
direction
Extraction Mechanics
Basic considerations
1. II molar banding:
Usually II molars are banded for anchorage purposes or
for alignment and control. Differential torque is used as an
31
effective anchorage control as for as intra oral anchorage is
concerned – applied by the use of tip back bend.
2. II premolar bonding
Smaller inter-bracket distances result in bends being
relatively close the center if second bicuspid is not banded the
off center bend can be placed more distant form the center. As
we move away from the center, differential torque increases
and hence the anchorage. Also, the clinical guide to effective
anchor control is to observe the unbanded bicuspids for mesial
tipping which indicates a forward movement of the molars.
32
often produce a different wire/ bracket relationship than might
be expected.
Cuspid retraction
Achieve arch alignment & leveling
Tip back bend with short segment at anchor end
Place toe in to prevent M–L rotation of molar
Use power chains to retract
Clinically evaluate anchor control
- Anchor unit is upright
- Anteriors undergo tipping, root movement & so on
- No distal tipping of molars (countered by elastic
force).
With retraction, bend approaches the center.
33
Only tip back bend provides anchor control
If molars tip mesially during retraction , it indicates that
too much force is used for retraction
Molar protraction
Also achieved with minimal banding using differential
torque
However, more rigid wire is used
Mesial in rotation –should not be countered with toe –in
‘V’ bend placed immediately distal to bicuspid
Use power chain to protract
34
Neutral zone
Malocclusion is a state of equilibrium
Never expand canines
Never place incisors out of neutral zone
Always treat posterior teeth to their arch widths
Every individual contains all information defining the
force of occlusion, habits & so on. “Remove arch wires
periodically during treatment ”. As the teeth are in mobile
state during treatment, they move quickly in the direction of
neutral zone.
Retention
Corrections should maintain themselves
Typical Retainer Policy includes
- Full time wear –6wks.
- Nightwear only –6 months.
Never discard retainer – check it every night –if not
passive –wear it when needed - PATIENT RESPONSIBILITY.
Effectiveness in Differential Moments in Anchorage
Control - Hart, Taft, and Greenberg -AJO 1992
In this study, the authors clinically and cephalometrically
investigated maximum and minimum anchorage control in four
first premolar extraction cases, using the "differential
moments (torque)" concept.
35
They concluded that the relative stability of maxillary
and mandibular molar position is of clinical significance,
indicating the effectiveness of differential moments as a means
of controlling intraoral anchorage. A significantly greater
mesial movement of the molars, both maxillary and
mandibular, is seen in those cases where the anchorage was
not considered to be maximum.
Conclusion
Understanding the mechanics encourages the clinician to
stay with the appliance of their own choice. Making certain
changes in the arch wire in time will enable the clinician to
continue his favorite technique, without any limitations.
36