Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Purpose of Vaccination
2
Vaccine Efficacy
3
Normal Bacterial Flora
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Normal colon
Bacterial colonization of the body
per gm or cm2
Bifidobacterium bifidum
Bacterial colonization
4
E.coli
Role of Bacterial Toxins in disease
DISEASE
TOXIN PRODUCED
(BACTERIA)
Diphtheria
Diphtheria toxin
Corynebacterium diphtheriae
Tetanus
Tetanus toxin
Clostridium tetani
5
Invasion of Cells
7
New developments in vaccines
8
New developments in vaccines
• Antigen presentation
• Virus like particles
• Adjuvants
• Slow release vehicles
• Conjugation
• Formulation
• Multivalent vaccines
• Addition of muco-adhesives for oral delivery
• Addition of preservatives and stabilizers (lyophilization)
9
Vaccine manufacture
Antigen Production
• Eggs
– Influenza
• Cell culture
– Viral vaccines either whole virus or subunit
– Genetically engineered proteins
10
Vaccine Processing
• Antigen concentration.
• Removal of unwanted foreign components.
– Host proteins
– Host DNA
– Adventitious agents
• Removal of unnecessary Bacterial or Viral
components.
– LPS
– Unwanted proteins (not involved in immunity)
– Unwanted nucleic acid
• Change of diluting solution.
• Addition of other components.
– Adjuvants, stabilizers, preservatives etc 11
Growth
of
Virus, Yeast
Clarification
Concentratio
n + Purification
or Bacteria
Centrifuge Chemical
Cell culture Formaldehyde
precipitation
Inactivation
βPL
12
Antigen Fill and
presentation Formulation
Finish
DT CONHNHCO(CH2)4CONHNHOC- Vi-
CP
CONJUGATES S
Combining antigen(s)
Combining with
adjuvant
Stabilizers
VIRUS LIKE PARTICLES ISCOMS Preservatives
Cryo-protectants
VIROSOMES
ADJUVANTS 13
Types of Vaccines
14
Types of Vaccines
• Inactivated toxins
• Inactivated whole bacteria or viruses
• Live attenuated bacteria or viruses
• Subunit vaccines
• Genetically engineered proteins
• Polysaccharide vaccines
• Conjugated vaccines
• Recombinant DNA modified organisms
• DNA vaccines
15
Inactivated Toxins
• Exotoxin • Endotoxin
– Gram negative and gram – Gram negative bacteria.
positive bacteria. – Heat stable.
– Heat Labile. – Lipopolysaccharide.
– Protein. – Firmly bound to the
– Secreted by the bacteria. bacteria outer membrane.
16
Toxoid
• Not a vaccine against the organism.
• Vaccine against pathogenic exotoxin.
• Tetanus, diphtheria, (pertussis?), anthrax?
– Purify toxin then chemically inactivate (toxoid)
• Risk of incomplete inactivation.
• TT, DT.
– Genetically modify toxin so non-toxic
• CRM (diphtheria), mLT (cholera, ETEC)
17
Inactivated Toxins
19
Tetanus
• Clostridium tetani
• Gram positive rod
• Not transmitted from person to person
• Transmission via contaminated wounds
• Found in soil and animal feces
• Replicate in low oxygen environment
• Release toxin which enters bloodstream
• Acts on the nervous system to block
neurotransmitters
20
Tetanus
23
Diphtheria
• Corynebacterium diphtheriae.
• Gram positive bacillus.
• Only produces a powerful exotoxin when infected
with a bacteriophage. (the phage carries the toxin
gene which coverts the bacteria from non-toxigenic
to toxigenic)
• Diphtheria is now well controlled by national
immunization programs.
• Only receives attention when routine immunization
programs fall.
24
Diphtheria
25
Whole Bacteria or Virus
Vaccines
Cholera bacteria
Polio virus
26
Whole Killed
• Whole pathogen grown and killed
– Heat, chemical modification (formaldehyde,
βPL,..)
– Pertussis, cholera.
– IPV (Inactivated Polio), Influenza, Hepatitis A.
• Advantage
– Relatively easy
– Generally safe to administer - no risk of
reversion, infection.
27
Whole Killed
• Disadvantages
– Numerous injections normally required
– No or limited cellular immunity
– Immunity often shorter-lasting than live vaccines
– Reactogenicity from LPS, lipids..
– Adjuvant often required (alum, emulsions)
– Risk of growing pathogenic organism (eg. polio)
– Risk of incomplete inactivation
– Inappropriate immune response ? eg RSV ???
– Can not focus immunity on protective antigen.
28
Inactivated Whole Cell Cholera Vaccine
Manufacturing Process
Fermentatio
n
SBL Vaccine
Cholera toxin
B subunit
Inactivation
Concentratio
n Bulk Formulatio
And Monovalent n
Washing
29
Subunit
• Purify a protein or proteins from pathogen
– Eliminate reactogenic contaminants (eg LPS)
– Selective presentation of 'protective' antigens
• Pertussis
– Pertussis toxin + filamentous haemagglutinin + pertactin (no
LPS)
• Influenza (subunit)
– Mainly haemaglutinin + neuraminidase
• Disadvantages
– Requires growing the pathogen and purifying
protective (antigens) subunits.
30
Pertussis
31
Pertussis
• Bordetella pertussis.
• Gram negative coccobacillus.
• Extremely contagious infecting almost all
susceptible close contacts.
• WHO estimated in 1999 that pertussis was still
responsible for about 300,000 deaths mainly
in sub-Saharan Africa.
• 40 million cases annually.
32
Pertussis Vaccines
• Whole cell vaccine.
– Whole bacterial cells which are rendered non toxic using
formalin.
– Problem with this vaccine was its reactogenicity.
33
Bordetella pertussis
Pertussis toxin
35
Pertussis components
• Filamentous Haemagglutinin: a cell wall component
implicated in attachment to the respiratory
epithelium.
• Antibody to FHA protect mice from lethal respiratory
but not intracerebral challenge.
• Antibody to FHA is produced as a result of infection
or after vaccination.
• Some studies have shown a correlation of antibody
titre to FHA with protection whereas other studies
have not.
36
Pertussis components
• Pertacin: a 69 kD outer membrane protein (OMP).
• Protects neonatal mice against respiratory
challenge.
• Antibody to Pertactin is produced as a result of
infection or after vaccination with either whole
cell or acellular vaccines.
• Antibodies against Pertactin are implicated in
protection against pertussis.
37
Pertussis
• Other components being investigated for their
role in toxicity and infection.
– adenylate cyclase
– endotoxin
– tracheal cytotoxin
– heat labile toxin
– agglutinogens
38
Polysaccharide
• Many bacteria produce a strain-specific capsular
polysaccharide on their surface.
• Antibody to these antigens are protective.
– Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus Type B,
Meningitis A,C,W,Y (not B!) Typhoid (Vi).
• Can be easily purified.
• Immunogenic in older children / adults.
• But poorly immunogenic in infants
• T-cell independent responses
• Short lived
• Low antibody responses
39
Different forms of Polysaccharide
40
Conjugate
Vaccines
41
Polysaccharide conjugates
42
Haemophilus b
43
Haemophilus
44
Haemophilus
45
Haemophilus b
46
Hib Vaccines
• Unconjugated vaccines:
• First Hib vaccines consisted of purified PRP.
• Immunogenic in children >2 years
• Immune response in younger children was poor.
• The response to carbohydrate antigens is T-cell
independent. Young children lack the immune
system maturity required to mount such a response.
47
Hib Vaccines
• Conjugated vaccines:
• Covalently linking PRP to a protein carrier results in
T-cell recognition of PRP.
• Recruitment of T-helper cells allows production of
antibodies to PRP and importantly induces
immunological memory.
• This type of response is fully developed at a young
age.
48
Typhoid Vaccine
Vi Capsular Polysaccharide O COOH
O
Fermentatio
n AcO
AcN O
Inactivation
Vi Capsular
Polysaccharid Sterile Formulatio
e Filtration n
Purification
49
Vi Conjugate vaccine
Vaccine against Typhoid Fever
Exoprotein A (rEPA)
C=O
NHNHCO(CH2)4CONHNH
Spacer
C=O
Vi
Capsular Polysaccharide
50
Live Attenuated
51
Live Attenuated
• Advantages:
– Mimics natural infection
– Humoral and cellular response.
– Immunological memory.
– Generally cheap.
• Disadvantages:
– Not suitable for all organisms
– May revert to a virulent form
– Circulating antibody may interfere with response
– Immunity to non-protective antigens
– Safety in immuno-suppressed individuals?
52
Live Attenuated Vaccines
Typhoid bacteria
Measles virus
53
Measles
54
Burden of Measles
55
Measles
• Caused by Rubeola virus
– Genus Morbillivirus
– Family Paramyxoviridae
• Six structural proteins
– 3 complexed to the viral RNA
– Matrix protein associated with inner layer of lipid
membrane
– 2 viral membrane proteins
• Fusion protein – fusion with host cell
• H protein – adhesion of virus to host cell
56
Immune response to Measles
57
Immune response to Measles
• Antibody response.
– Serum IgM
– Serum IgG
– Serum IgA and secretory IgAs.
• Re-exposure induces a strong secondary IgG
response and prevents clinical disease.
58
Immune response to Measles
• Cell Mediated Response
– Sensitization of T – lymphocytes.
– Production of cytotoxic T- cells.
59
Measles Vaccine
• Killed Inactivated vaccine was abandoned in
1967 as it did not provide complete
protection.
• An attenuated vaccine was also being
developed and first licensed in 1963. This was
found to be too reactogenic for routine use.
• Further attenuation produced an acceptable
vaccine.
60
Attenuation of Measles
EDMONSTON B STRAIN
• 24 passages in primary kidney cells
• 28 passages in human amnion cells
• Passages in chick embryo cells
• Vaccine immunogenic but too reactive.
SCHWARZ
• 85 additional passages in chick embryo cells
• Vaccine 90-95% effective, low reactogenicity.
• At least 20 years immunity.
61
Polio Virus
62
Polio Virus
• An enterovirus belonging to the family
picornavirus.
• Contains RNA surrounded by icosahedral
protein capsid.
• Contains no lipid and is acid stable so can pass
through the stomach.
• Three antigenically distinct types, 1, 2, and 3.
Vaccines contain all three types.
63
Oral Vaccination
64
Response to Polio Vaccination
65
OPV vs IPV
• Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV)
• Advantages
– Results in production of secretory IgA. Important in
protecting the individual. Reduces the spread of wild polio.
– IgAs has been observed to persist for 5 – 6 years
• Disadvantage
– Genetic instability of Type 3 strain rarely results vaccine
induced poliomyelitis.
– Transmission of vaccine strains to unvaccinated individuals.
66
OPV vs IPV
• Inactivated Polio Vaccine
– Safe and effective.
– Lack of production of mucosal IgAs results in
failure to eliminate intestinal re-infection and fecal
excretion.
– Recommended for countries where polio is no
longer endemic.
67
Recombinant
Protein produced by genetic engineering
• Advantage
– Safe. Growth in non pathogenic yeast cells
– Easier – in case of difficult to grow viruses like
hepB, HPV.
• Disadvantages:
– Need to identify protective antigen/s
– Obtaining antigen in 'correct' conformation
– Usually poorly immunogenic alone
– Poor CMI – requires adjuvant.
69
Hepatitis B
70
Hepatitis B
71
Hepatitis B
• More than 2 billion people alive have at some time
been infected with Hepatitis B virus.
• 350,000 remain chronically infected carriers.
• Every year there are
– 4 million acute cases
– 1 million deaths
• Carriers
– 25% of children (<7 years) become carriers.
– 10% of older children and adults become carriers.
72
Aims of Hep B Vaccination
• Vaccination aimed at reduction of:
– Clinical disease.
– HBV transmission.
– Chronic hepatitis and its associated liver damage
and liver cancer.
73
Hepatitis B
• During infection large amounts of HBsAg are
produced.
• Only small amounts of HBsAg combine with
the cores to form whole virus.
• Remainder is released into the blood stream
as spherical particles or filaments.
74
Immune Response to Infection
• Antibody to HBsAg indicates clinical recovery
and is associated with immunity to Hepatitis B.
• Antibody to HBcAg is also produced and is first
to appear after infection.
– Present in blood of acute and chronic subjects as
well as those recovered.
– This antibody does not neutralize virus.
75
Plasma derived Vaccines
76
Plasma derived Vaccines
77
Recombinant Vaccines
E.coli
S. cerevisiae
78
Recombinant Vaccine
79
Recombinant Vaccine
• The gene coding for HBsAg was discovered in
1970.
• The gene has been inserted into a yeast cell.
• As the yeast cell grows it produces large
amounts of HBsAg.
• The HBsAg is extracted and purified then
incorporated into the vaccine.
80
Recombinant Vaccine
81
Recombinant DNA modified organisms
Live Vectors
82
Recombinant DNA modified organisms
Vaccinia virus
expressing papilloma
virus antigens on its
surface.
83
DNA Vaccines
• Involves the injection of naked DNA coding for
one or more genes.
• The gene is grafted onto another piece of DNA
which acts as a vector.
• Injected into muscle tissue, once in the cell
the gene prompts the cell to produce antigen.
• The immune system then mounts an immune
response.
84
HISTORY
❑ In 1990, University of Wisconsin, Jon Wolff
found that injection of DNA plasmids produce
a protein response in mice.
❑ In 1993, Merck Research Laboratories, Dr.
Margaret Liu found that intramuscular
injection of DNA from influenzae virus into
mice produced complete immune response
❑ In 1996, trials involving T-cell lymphoma,
influenzae & herpes simplex virus were
started
DNA vaccines Vs Traditional vaccines
Viral gene
Recombinant DNA
Technology Expression
plasmid
Plasmid
DNA
Bacterial cell
Plasmid DNA get
Amplified
Plasmid DNA
Purified
Ready to use
METHODS OF DELIVERY
❑ Syringe delivery:-
Either
intramuscularly
or
Intradermally
Contd..
❑ Gene gun delivery:-
BY TWO PATHWAYS
ENDOGENOUS :- Antigenic Protein is presented by
cell in which it is produced
EXOGENOUS :- Antigenic Protein is formed in
one cell but presented by
different cell
HOW DNA VACCINES WORK
Muscle Cells
+ Plasmid DNA
ENDOGENOUS PATHWAY
Nucleus
Plasmid
DNA
mRNA MHC-I
Antigenic
Peptides
Antigenic Protein
T- Helper Cell
Mu
ltip
ly
Memory T cells
EXOGENOUS PATHWAY
Antigenic Peptides
Memory
T- Helper Cell
Antibodies
Cytokines
Plasma B-Cell
MHC-II
Activated B-Cell Memory B-Cell
WHEN VIRUS ENTER IN THE BODY
Memory T-Cell
Viral Protein
Antibodies
ADVANTAGES
Insertional mutagenesis
Chromosome instability
Turn ON Oncogenes
Turn OFF Tumor suppressor genes
Over Expression of DNA vaccine
Acute or chronic inflammatory responses
Autoimmune diseases
Autoimmune Myositis
Antibiotic Resistance
107
• Banana
Advantages
Do not need cooking.
Protein not destroyed even after cooking.
Inexpensive .
Grown widely in developing countries.
Disadvantages
Trees take 2-3 to mature years.
Spoils rapidly after ripening.
• Rice
Advantages
Commonly used in baby food.
High expression of antigen.
Disadvantages
Grows slowly.
Requires glasshouse condition.
108
Clinical trials
• Norwalk Virus
20 people fed with transgenic potato .
19 (95%)of them expressing Norwalk virus antigen showed seroconversion.
• Hepatitis B
First human trials of potato-based vaccine against Hepatitis B have reported
encouraging results.
The amount of HBsAg needed for one dose could be achieved in a single
potato.
Levels of specific antibodies significantly exceeded the protective level of
10mIU/mL in human.
109
Pros
• Cost effective.
• Easy to administer.
• Easy to store.
• Acceptable to poor developing country.
• Fail safe
• Activate both mucosal and systemic immunity.
• Heat stable.
• Do not required cold chain maintenance.
• No fear of contamination.
Cons
• Transgenic contamination can occur.
• Antibiotic resistance marker genes can spread from GM food
to pathogenic Bacteria.
• Difficulty in dose maintenance.
110
Virus-like particle vaccines
• This consist of viral proteins derived from the
structural proteins of a virus.
• These proteins can self-assemble into particles that
resemble the virus from which they were derived but
lack viral nucleic acid, meaning that they are not
infectious.
• Because of their highly repetitive, multivalent
structure, virus-like particles are typically more
immunogenic than subunit vaccines.
• The human papillomavirus (HPV) and Hepatitis C
virus vaccines are two virus-like particle-based
vaccines currently in clinical use. 111
HPV vaccines are sub-unit vaccines
made of virus like particles: VLPs
1. Stanley M. Vaccine. 2005 [Epub ahead of print]. 2. Batista FD, Neuberger MS. EMBO Journal. 2000;19:513–520. 3. Tyring SK. Curr Ther
Res. 2000;61:584–596. 4. Roden RB, Hubbert NL, Kirnbauer R, et al. J Virol. 1996;70:3298–3301. 5. Chen XS, Garcea RL, Goldberg I, et al.
MolCell. 2000;5:557–567.
Th2 cell help for B lymphocytes is crucial
to
•Polymeric nano- and microparticles have recently been shown to possess significant potential
as drug delivery systems.
•Use of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles with entrapped antigens such as proteins,
peptides, or DNA represents an exciting approach for controlling the release of vaccine
antigens and optimizing the desired immune response via selective targeting of the antigen to
antigen-presenting cells (APCs).
•The efficient delivery of antigens to APCs, especially in dendritic cells (DCs), and the
activation of APCs are some of the most important issues in the development of effective
vaccines.
• Using nanoparticle based vaccine delivery systems, it is possible to target delivery to DCs,
activate these APCs, and control release of the antigen.
•Nanoparticles prepared from biodegradable and biocompatible polymers such as
poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(amino acid)s, and polysaccharides have been found to
be effective vaccine carriers for a number of antigens..
118
•Polymeric nanoparticles formulated from biodegradable polymers (PLA, ϓ-PGA) are being
widely explored as carriers for controlled delivery of different agents including proteins,
peptides, plasmid DNA (pDNA) and low molecular weight compounds.
•Controlled delivery systems consisting of nanoparticles can potentially delivery either the
antigens or adjuvants to the desired location at predetermined rates and durations to generate
an optimal immune response.
•The carrier may also protect the vaccine from degradation until it is released.
•Biodegradable polymers provide sustained release of the encapsulated antigen and degrade in
the body to nontoxic, low molecular weight products that are easily eliminated.
•There are three primary mechanisms of adjuvant function: (1) stabilization of antigen, (2)
delivery of antigen, and (3) activation of innate immunity.
•The duration of delivery is likely to affect immunity.
•The biodistribution of nano- and microparticles and the particle-related immune response can
be regulated by controlling the size of the particles.
•Consequently, the size of the particulate delivery system is an important factor for modulating
immune responses via differential interactions with APCs.
•Other potential advantages of the controlled delivery approach include reduced systemic side
effects and the possibility of co-encapsulating multiple antigenic epitopes or both antigen and
adjuvant in a single carrier. 119
Induction of immune responses by nanoparticle-based vaccine
120
New Technologies and Vaccine
Development
Issues for Live Attenuated
Virus Vaccines
• Natural infection may not induce
• immunity or optimal immune
responses
• Some viruses cause deleterious
immune responses
• Potential reversion to virulence
– Concern for HIV
• Decreased efficacy due to pre-existing
antibodies
– Influenza
• Decoy antigens on the virus
Comparison of Vaccine
Technologies
• Live attenuated viruses • DNA vaccines
– Highly effective
– Need for increased potency
– Potential risk
– Designer immune response
– Manufacturing challenge
e.g., Type of TH
• Recombinant proteins
– Specificity: avoid
– Potent antibody response deleterious or diversional
– Non-native forms antigens
– Not induce CTL – Stability
• Viral vectors – Safety
– Risk – Generic manufacturing
– Resistance / pre-existing – Cost
antibody
– Inflammation
HIV Clade (Strain)
Diversity
H G
J
A
E C
D
B F
HIV and the Pathogenesis of AIDS, ASM Press (1998), J.A.
Heterogeneity of HIV
Strains
Exogenous Protein Results in
Generation of T Cell Help But
Not CTL
CD4 + Helper
T cell
CD4
Acidified (TH)
Endosome
MHC Class II
Glycoprotein
T cell
Receptor
Exogenous
Endocytosis
Antigen
Golgi
Apparatus
Nucleus
Modified
DNA
Vaccine
Generation of CTL by DNA
Vaccines
CD8 +
DNA Proteasome
cleaves protein
Cytotox
Vaccine into short peptides ic T
Cytosolic cell
Antigen
(CTL)
CD8
mRNA
DNA Modified from
Mc Donnell WB and
Golgi Askari FK, NEJM
Nucleus Apparatus 334:42 (1996)
1918 Flu Pandemic
20 Million Deaths
80
Survival
60
40
%
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Day After Infection
Fu T-M…Liu MA and Donnelly JJ, J Virol 71:2715 (1997)
Plasmid Non-Specific
Stimulation
Due to:
•PuPuCGPyPy sequences
– “CpG motifs”
•Potential means to increase / decrease / or
change nature of immunogenicity of
DNA Vaccines
Krieg AM…Klinman DM, Nature 374:546 (1995) Klinman DM…Krieg AM, PNAS 93:2879 (1996)
Sato Y…Carson DA and Raz E, Science 273:352 (1996) Klinman DM…Ishijatsubo Y, JI 158:3635 (1997)
HIV
HIV
Envelope
gp12
0
gp4
1
Different Forms of HIV Envelope
Used for Immunizations
Monome
r gp120 Soluble Membrane
Oligomer Bound gp160
Recombi gp140
nant DNA vaccine
protein Recombinant
B cell
Antibodies
CD8 +
DNA Proteasome Cytotox
Vaccine cleaves protein
into short peptides ic T
Cytosolic cell
Antigen
(CTL)
CD8
mRNA
DNA Modified from
Mc Donnell WB and
Golgi Askari FK, NEJM
Nucleus Apparatus 334:42 (1996)
Clinical Trials of DNA Vaccines
• HIV
– Therapeutic and prophylactic
– Multiple vaccines / multiple trials
• Influenza
• Malaria
– Multiple vaccines / multiple trials
– Antigen + cytokine genes
• Hepatitis B
• Cancer
• (Gene Therapy)
Second Generation DNA Vaccines
• Increased potency
• Oral delivery
Encapsulated DNA:
Microparticles
DNA Vaccine Replicons Rapidly
Produce More Protein Antigen
Replicon DNA
Nucleus
m
7 3 A
5' Antige (
Replicase nsProteins n
'
G n)
Antigen
mRNA
“Designer Gene
Vaccines”
Genes Encoding:
Replicon: •Cytokines
•Amplify •Co-stimulatory
molecules
antigen
mRNA •Targeting
molecules
Ç or † CpG Content:
(immunostimulatory
sequences)
Protection of BALB/c mice after immunization with
plasmid DNA and/or recombinant MVA
DNA DNA 0
MVA MVA 20
MVA DNA 0
*5 animals/group
Antigens used: PbCSP + PbTRAP
J. Schneider, …, A.V.S. Hill, Nature Medicine 4:397-402
DNA Vaccines: Tool
for Functional Genomics/Proteomics
Geno
me
In Vitro
Expressi
on
Sele Ligat
ct e
Gene
s
In Vivo
Expression/Func
tion or
Immunogenicity
Characteristic of DNA
Vaccines
• Able to generate CTL, antibodies, TH
– Cross-strain protective CTL
– Advantages of antigen structure for antibodies
• Transmembrane protein
• Native glycosylation
– TH intrinsically TH 1
• Can co-deliver cytokines to augment or alter T phenotypes
H
– Mechanisms for CTL and TH generation elucidated
– Ability to stimulate desired immune responses not
induced by wild-type disease
– Avoid certain limitations/concerns of viral vectors
Characteristics of DNA Vaccines
• Second generation DNA Vaccines
– Increased potency
– Oral/Mucosal delivery
– Facile manipulation of immune responses
• Potential advantages for clinical usage
– Ability to generate T cell immunity: critical for many
unconquered diseases
– Key characteristics relevant to globally-needed vaccines
• Generic technology
• Stability
• Manufacturing ease
• Cost
• Potential duration of immune response