Soil Investigation Report 3

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY

1898 AVENUE CORNER CHERRY STREET
PHILIPPINE NAVY NAVAL INSTALLATION COMMAND
SANGLEY POINT, CAVITE CITY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation performed at
the proposed project site in 1898 Avenue Corner Cherry Street, Philippine Navy
Naval Installation Command, Sangley Point, Cavite City.
The purpose of the investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions at the
project sites by test borings. Perform laboratory testing and provide discussions
and recommendations concerning the general subsurface conditions and the
foundations of the structures planned for construction at site.
2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling two (2) boreholes
to 30.0 meters deep each with a trailer-mounted rotary wash drilling equipment
employing the wash boring method supplemented by rock coring. Borehole
locations are shown on Plate No. 1.
Disturbed soil samples were obtained from Standard Penetration Tests (SPT)
(ASTM D1586) in the soils at 1.0-meter intervals for the first 6 meters of depth
and 1.5-meter intervals thereafter by driving a 50.8 mm. outside diameter and
34.9 mm. inside diameter split spoon sampler with a 63.63 kg. hammer falling
freely from a height of 762 mm. The number of blows required to force the
sampler into the soil was counted and recorded for three (3) consecutive 152.4
mm. penetrations. The number of blows for the last two (2) 152.4 mm.
penetrations was taken as the standard penetration value denoted by N in the
geotechnical data. Log of the boreholes, are presented on Plate Nos. 3 and 4.
The Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2488) used in describing soils is
shown in Plate No. 2.
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING
Selected soil samples taken from boreholes were tested for atterberg limits
(ASTM D 2937), natural water content (ASTM D 2216), grain size analysis
(ASTM D 422), specific gravity (ASTM D 854), unit weight (ASTM C 29) and
unconfined compression (ASTM D2116). Rock core samples were tested for
unconfined compression (ASTM D3188). Laboratory test results are shown on
Plate Nos. 6 to 35.
4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The detailed subsurface conditions including watertables are shown in the
geotechnical data (Plate Nos. 3 and 4). Idealized Soil Profile is shown in Plate
No. 28.
5.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Site Preparation and Grading
Existing vegetations in the areas to be graded shall be stripped and
disposed offsite. The exposed surface shall be brought to final subgrade
elevation compacted to at least 95.0%, level and non-yielding.
The site is almost on grade and site grading is very minimal.
5.2 Foundation Support
Structures planned for construction at the site investigated can be
supported by either isolated spread footings, strip footings or mat
depending upon the geometric constraints imposed by the architectural
layout. The footings shall have a minimum width of 1.0 meter and be
embedded at least 1.0 meter below existing grade and can be designed
with an allowable soil bearing capcity of 290 kpa for dead plus live load
and 377 kpa if total design loads include wind or seismic forces.
Estimated settlement is 10.65mm. Please refer to Plate Nos. 29 and 30.
The estimated subsurface modulus is 40,695 KN/m .
All isolated spread footings shall be provided with stiff footing tie
beams to minimize differential settlements.

5.3 Expansive Soils
The immediate underlying subsurface soils has no plasticities and the
potential for volume change is very,minimal.
5.4 Liquefaction
The site is likely to liquefy at maximum ground surface acceleration of
0.20g. Please refer to Plate No. 32.
5.5 Dynamic Soil Springs
Vertical, k2 = 384 KN/cm
Horizontal, kv = 300 KN/cm
Please refer to Plate No. 31
5.6 Seismicity
Structures to be constructed at the site shall be designed for Seismic
Source Type A, Soil Profile type SD and the closest distance to known
seismic source is > 15 km (Valley Fault Line) in accordance with the
National Structural Code of the Philippines, Volume 1, 6th Edition.
5.7 Limitations
The report has been prepared to aid in the design of the project. Its scope
is limited to the specific project and location described herein and

represents the subsurface conditions at the site at the time of the
investigation. Should there be appreciable differences in the subsurface
soils during construction the evaluator shall be notified and supplemental
recommendations will be issued.
The following plates are attached and complete this geotechnical investigation
report.
Plate No. 1 Borehole Location Plan
2 Unified Soil Classification System
3 to 4 Geotechnical Data
5 to 27 Laboratory Test Results
28 Idealized Soil Profile
29 to 32 Calculations
Pictures
Prepared by:
DOMINADOR R. FERMIN, JR.

Reg. Civil Engineer #7357
5550-B BOYLE STREET, PALANAN, MAKATI CITY
GEOTESTING (INTERNATIONAL) INC.
GEOTECHNICAL & MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS TEL. NOS.: 832-5297 • 728-5778 • 728-5831
FAX NOS.: 832-5318-833-16-11
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

GRAPH LETTER
MAJOR DIVISION TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL SYMBOL
••• WELL-GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL

SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR
GRAVEL CLFAN GRAVELS •'•♦,* GW NO FINES
AND
GRAVELLY
POORLY-GRADED GRAVEl-S. GRAVEL
SOILS
GP SAM MIX 'ORES. LITTLE OR
COARSE MO I lr-i I
GRAINED
SOILS SILT V GRAVELS. GRAVE SAND-
SILT MIXTURES
MORE THAN SO* GRAVELS WITH FINES
GM
OF COARSL I-MAC IAPPRI C IAHLI AMOl/NI
TION RETAINED OF UNI '.)
ON NO. 4 SIEVE
CLAVEV GRAVtLS. GRAVEL SAND
CLAY MIXTURES
Wl LL (.HADED SANDS. GRAVELLY

SAND SW SANDS. LITTLE OR NO FINES
CLEAN SAND
AND (LIITLE OR NO
SANDY FINES)
POOHLV r.KAUCDSANUS. GRAVELLY
SOILS SP SAND'.. LITTLE OR NO FINES
MORE THAN 10%
OF MATERIAL IS
LARGER THAN NO.
i o o s i e v f size
SANDS WIT" I IN) |

SM "NOS. SAND-SILT MIXTURES
MORE THAN SO*
OF COARSE MIA! (APPRECIABLE AMI.ON I
TION PASSING MM II
NO. « Sit VI
sc I '"NOS. SAND-Cl AY MIX IUIII S
INORGANIC M' -FINE

I I'•. MOCK ( LUUM. SILI Y OR
ML AY» Y
-.11 i •• ,vi in nciTv
FINE SILTS LIQUID LIMIT I OW l u MEDIUM

LESS THAN SO "LASTlnTY. GRAVELLY CLAYS,
GRAINED AND CL •
SOILS CLAYS
fWrt
ISANDORGANK
OL . I AVS O* I OW PLAMII.IT Y
OS OR
MH DlAl i INE SAND OR
SILT> •••
MORE THAN »0» SILTS

INORGANIC CLAYS OP HIOH
OP MATERIAL II
SMALLER THAN NO.
AND CH PLASliriTY, l„l CLAYS
100 SIEVE SIZE CLAYS
M»m4'i'.Vvipi
' CLAYS OF MCDIUM TO HIGH
OH PLAftl ICITV, ORGANIC SILTS
• •'in • m
.'MUS, SWAMP SOILS

HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT wiih .iii.i- ORGANIC C- >-j:i NTS
*-•
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
NOTES:
1. DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE CLASSIFICATIONS.

2. WHEN SHOWN ON THE BORING LOGS. THE FOLLOWING TERMS ARE USED TO DESCRIBE THE
CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS AND THE RELATIVE COMPACTNESS OF COHESIONLESS
SOILS.
COHESIVE SOILS COHESIONLESS SOILS
(APPROXIMATE SHEARING VERY LOOSE THESE ARE USUALLY

STRENGTH IN KSF) LOOSE BASED ON AN EXAMINA
MEDIUM DENSE TION OF SOIL SAMPLES,
VERY SOFT LESS THAN .25 DENSE PENETRATION RESIST
SOFT 0.25 TO 0.5 VERY DENSE ANCE. AND SOIL DENSITY
MEDIUM STIFF 0.5 TO 1.0 DATA
STIFF 1.0 TO 2.0
VERY STIFF 2.0 TO 4.0
HARD GREATER THAN 4.0
Plate No. 2
GEOTESTING (INTERNATIONAL) INC. 5550-B BOYLE STREET. PALANAN
G8
MAKATI CITY
GEOTECHNICAL & MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS TEL NO. 832-5297 • 832-5318 • 833-1611
GEOTESTING
GEOTECHNICAL DATA
LOCATION: 1898 Avenue Comer Cherry Street, Date Started:
PROJECT:
Philippine Navy Naval Installation August 13, 2016 BH
PROPOSED MAYNILAD FLOOD
Command, Sangley Point, Cavite City
MANAGEMENT STUDY Date Finished: 1
Surface Elevation: August 15, 2016
Water Content Number of Blows
Description And &
Classification of Materials
Per Foot / 30 cm.
Atterberq Limits,
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
SJT-] NP
SILTY SAND; Grayish brown to gray,
wet, non- plastic, medium S1T-:
dense to dense, trace soft clay,
trace broken shells. (SM)
S1T-
SIT-^
S1T-J
S1T-*
i 5
sit-;
SIT-c 35
SlT-< 37
10
SlT-10 36
S1T-] 1 35
S1T-12 37
SILTY CLAY;Gray, wet, low plasticity, 15

•_S]T-
S1T-13
medium stiff, trace sand. (CL) , Sll-1
S1T-14
SIH
Hole Logged by: Elmer O. Estelon DATE:

i S1T-15
August 15,2016 Remarks:
Watertable = 0.35 meter BGL*
Noted by: Pepito G. Tampengco, Jr. DATE: August 24, 2016
Operator:
o — Water Content PI - Plasticity Index HW - Hammer Weight
—/ — Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test (s) CS - Core Sample Bong Del Rio
/- - Plastic Limit SB - Shelby Y - Water Table
BGL - Below Ground Level PLATE NO.
GEOTESTING (INTERNATIONAL) INC. 5550-B BOYLE STREET. PALANAN
MAKATI CITY
Gh GEOTECHNICAL & MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS TEL NO. 832-5297 * 832-5318 • 833-1611
GEOTECHNICAL DATA
PROJECT: LOCATION: 1898Avenue Corner Cherry Street, Date Started:
PROPOSED MAYNTLAD FLOOD
Command, Sangley Point, Cavite Gty
Surface Elevation: August 15,2016
£ Water Content Number of Blows
Description And CT> a. i- Sc
Classification of Materials o "N" Per Foot / 30 cm.
_l a </j Atterberg Limits. % 0-'
M 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
SILTY CLAY;Gray, wet, low plasticity,

V///A
medium stiff to stiff, little sand.
(CL)
TUFF ROCK; Grayish brown to brown,

w
20
L
• •
1 t-: 6
T-: 7
14
.50
30a
11 1 1
completely to highly weathered.
C >-i RE 2-9 %
(WC-WH) RC D= sill
RE >1 2%
c •y-2
RG D= Mil
.» .51
RE >1 4%
1! 25
C >-3
RC D=4
RE 5%
C >-4 RC D= 0%
I C >-5
REj>1 9%
RC D= 0%
1 C ^6 RE Z=2 2%
RC D= 2%
End of Boring
35
Hole Logged by. Elmer O. Estelon DATE: August 15, 2016 Remarks:
o - Water Content PI - Plasticity Index »w " Hammer Weight

-/ - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test (s) CS £°™ SamPle Bong Del Rio
BGL -
3elo * Gr ound Lev >i
PLATE NO. 3
5550-B BOYLE STREET, PALANAN
GEOTESTING (INTERNATIONAL) INC.
Gu
MAKATI CITY
GEOTECHNICAL & MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS TEL NO. 832-5297 * 832-5318 • 833-1611
GEOTECHNICAL DATA
LOCATI ON: 1898Avenue Corner Cherry Street, Date Started:
PROJECT:
PROPOSED MAYNILAD FLOOD
Surface Elevation: August 18, 2016
Water Content Number of Blows
Description And 6c
Per Foot / 30 cm.
Classification of Materials Atterberg Limits, %
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
S1T-1
SILTYSAND; Grayish brown to gray,
spt-:
wet, non- plastic, medium
dense to dense, trace soft clay,
trace broken shells. (SM) spt-: 22
SPT -
SPT-1
SIT-<
S1T-
S1T-F 37
SIT-' 37
10
S1T-10 32
S1T-J1 10
SILTYCLAY; Gray, wet, low plasticity,
stiff to very soft, trace sand. (CL)
S1T-12 HW
- soft to medium stiff S1T-13

15
1 SIJ-1
S1T-14
SB-1
Hole Logged by. Elmer O. Estelon DATE:

i S1T-15
August 18, 2016 Remarks:
Watertable = 0.35 meter BGL"
Operator:
o — Water Content PI - Plasticity Index HW - Hammer Weight
- / - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test (s) CS - Core Sample Bong Del Rio
/— - Plastic Limit SB - Shelby Y - Water Table
GEOTESTING (INTERNATIONAL) INC. 5550-B BOYLE STREET, PALANAN
MAKATI CITY
GEOTECHNICAL & MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS TEL NO. 832-5297 • 832-5318 • 833-1611
GEOTECHNICAL DATA
PROJECT: LOCATION: 1898 Avenue Corner Cherry Street, Date Started:
PROPOSED MAYNTLAD FLOOD
Surface Elevation:
August 18, 2016
Water Content
Description And Number of Blows
Sc
Classification of Materials Atterberg Limits, % 'N" Per Foot / 30 cm.
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
SILTY CLAY;Gray, wet, low plasticity,

medium stiff to stiff, brace to
little sand sand. (CL)
S1T-16
20
S1T-17
15cri
TUFF ROCK; Grayish brown to brown,
completely to highly weathered.
RE =13%
(WC-WH)
;.<CV.v RCD=Nil
RE =15%
, 25 c;-2 RCEH^Ll
C>-3 RE >17%
RCD=Nil
RE>:15%
C>4 RCD= 1%
CS-5 RE C=27%
RCD= 4%
30
End of Boring
35
Hole Logged by. Elmer O. Estelon DATE: August 18,2016 Remarks:

o - Water Content PI - Plosticity Index HW - Hammer Weight

—/ — Liquid Limit SPT — Standard Penetration Test (s) CS - Core Sample
/- - Plastic Limit SB - Shelby Y - Water Table
PROJECT PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY
LOCATION #1898 Avenue corner Cherry St., Phil. Navy Naval Installation Command
Sangley Point, Cavite City
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-1
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D421 AND D422) NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD D3
Sieve Diameter Wt. Ret. Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 205.60
no. (mm) (grams) Retained Passing finer diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 180.00
11/2 Moisture loss (gms) 25.60
1 25.00 Weight of can. (gms) 21.50
3/4 19.00 Weight of dry soil, (gms) 158.50
1/2 12.50 100 Moisture content (%) 16.15
3/8 9.50 15.60 9.84 90
4 4.75 20.60 13.00 77 Soil Classification SM
10 2.00 25.60 16.15 61
40 0.425 36.60 23.09 38 Specific Gravity 2.54

200 0.075 30.20 19.05 19
PAN
Unit weight, kg/cm3 1.86
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
ioq
5\
*v
5 '0
w\.
SUMMARY OF ATTERBERG
61 \
LIMITS RESULTS:
LIQUID LIMIT NON-PLASTIC
PLASTIC LIMIT NON-PLASTIC
PLASTICITY INDEX NON-PLASTIC
1*
1.00 0.10
particle diameter (mm)
ATTERBERG LIMITS (ASTM D423-D424) PLASTICITY CHART
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
Tare no.
Tare + Wet soil (g) c
£ 42
Tare + Dry soil (g)
Moisture loss
l 41
3
S 40
Tare weight o
Wt of dry soil
5 39 ^
Moisture content 38 -
> 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
No. of blows
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, LL NON-PLASTIC Average : PL NON-PLASTIC
Plate No. 5
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-3
GRAIN SI2E ANALYSIS (ASTM D421 AND D422) NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD J2
(mm) (grams) Retained Passing finer diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 184.50
3/8 9.50 16.90 10.29 90
10 2.00 22.60 13.76 65

200 0.075 39.60 24.10 22
PAN Unit weight, kg/cm5 1.85

LIMITS RESULTS:
ATTERBERG LIMITS (ASTM 0423-0424) PLASTICITY CHART
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT 45 -I
Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2 44
Tare no.
* 43
Tare ♦ Wet soil (g)
Tare + Dry soil (g)
Moisture loss •
:4i
3
Tare weight | 40
o
Wt of dry soil 5 39
Moisture content
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
No. of blows
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, 11. NON-PLASTIC Average : PL NON-PLASTIC
Plate No. 6
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-5
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD E3
Sieve Diameter Wt. Ret Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 198.00
(mm) (grams) Retained Passing liner diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 174.00

3/8 9.50 11.20 7.32 93

10 2.00 26.30 17.19 61

200 0.075 3660 23.92 19

LIMITS RESULTS:
ATTERBERG LIMITS(ASTM D423-D424) PLASTICITY CHART

I riil no 1 2 3 1 2
44
Tare no.
* 43
Tare + Wet soil (g)
Tare + Dry soil (g)
|
c
42
Moisture loss S 41
Tare weight t» 40
o
Wt of dry soil 2 39
Moisture content
No. of blows 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Liquid Limit, LL NON-PLASTIC Number of Blow*

Average : PL NON PLASTIC
Plate No. 7
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-7
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD B8

3/8 9.50 15.90 10.36 90

10 2.00 15.60 10.1b 66

200 0.075 35.60 23.19 21
PAN Unit weight, kg/cmJ 1.87

GRAIN •.!/( 0ISIRII1UII0N CURVE
A
*v
W
" X 66 SUMMARY OF ATTERBERG
LIMITS RESULTS:
v^
z| a
PLASTIC LIMIT
PLASTICITY INDEX
NON-PLASTIC
NON-PLASTIC
1.00 0.10
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT 45
Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2 44
Tare no.
* 43
Tare ♦ Wet soil (g)
1 42
Tare + Dry soil (g)
Moisture loss
Tare weight
1-
.?
o
40
Wt of dry soil 2 39
Moisture content
No. of blows 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Liquid Limit, LL Number of Blows

NON-PLASTIC Average : PL NON-PLASTIC
Plate No. 8
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-9
ASTM D 2216
no. (mm) in.sn-,1 Retained Passing finer diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 185.00
3/8 9.50 11.40 6.97 93
'1 4.75 22.50 13.76 79 Soil Classification SM
10 2.00 23.90 14.62 65

200 0.075 3660 22.39 23
PAN Unit weight, kg/cm 1.86
100
90
•Vi
M
|
80
70
JJ\
>t^
65 SUMMARY OF ATTERBERG
1 so LIMITS RESULTS:
•
«\ LIQUID LIMIT NON-PLASTIC

30 PLASTIC LIMIT NON-PLASTIC
20 PLASTICITY INDEX NON-PLASTIC
21
10
0
IOC 00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 0. X)
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT «s

Trial no 1 2 3 1 2
44
Tare no.
* 43
Tare + Wet soil (g) c

4 2
c
Tare + Dry soil (g)
3 41
Moisture loss
43
Tare weight
5
Wt of dry soil 19
Moisture content 38 -
10 15 20 25 30 35 4-J 4 5
No. of blows
Number of Blows
Plate No. 9
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-11
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS(ASTM D421 AND D422) NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT

ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD LI
Sieve Diameter Wt Ret Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 206.90
1 ?5.00 Weight of can. (gms) 21.50

1/2 12.50 100 Moisture content {%) 15.88

3/8 9.50 16.50 10.31 90
4 4.75 18 40 11.50 78 Soil Classification SM
10 2.00 22.10 13.81 64

200 0.075 35.40 22.13 19
PAN Unitweight,kg/cm3 1.85
•X)
100,
so • \
I ,0 MS.
tt GO
64 N SUMMARY OF ATTERBERG
| - \,
LIMITS RESULTS:
I - V^
.
:3E PLASTICITY INDEX NON-PLASTIC
1.00 0.10

Trial no 1 2 3 1 2 44
Tare no.
* 43
Tare * Wet soil (g)
S 42
Tare ♦ Dry soil (g)
Moisture loss
Tare weight
1 "40 J
1
o
Wt of dry soil S 39 J
Moisture content
No. of blows 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 j
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, LL NON-PLASTIC Average PL NON PIASTIC
Plate No. 10
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-13
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD R
1/2 12.50 Moisture content [%) 26.94
3/8 9.50
4 4.75 100 Soil Classification CL
10 2.00 5.60 3.77 96

?00 0.075 15.60 10.51 81

100
92 ^ ^ -
LIMITS RESULTS:
LIQUID LIMIT 41
PLASTIC LIMIT 21
PLASTICITY INDEX 20
1.00 0.10

Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
Tare no. SUN ASH EEI 8ATO LOVE
Tare ♦ Wet soil (g) 17.20 17.30 17 60 15.80 1S.20
Tare + Dry soil (g) 14 10 14.30 14.60 14.10 14.00
Moisture loss 3.10 3.00 300 1.70 1.20
Tare weight 7.00 7.00 700 7.00 700
Wt of dry soil 7.10 7.30 760 7.10 7.00
Moisture content 43.66 41 10 3947 23.94 1714
No. of blows 12 26 it,
Liquid Limit, LL 41.10 Average : PL 20.54
Plate No. 11
BOREHOLE NO. BH-1
SAMPLE NO. SPT-15
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD H
Sieve Diameter Wt Ret. Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 198.90

1/2 12.50 Moisture content (%) 26.17

3/8 9.50

10 2.00 6.20 4.40 96

200 0075 12.20 8.65 80
GRAIN Size DISTRIBUTION CURVE
LIMITS RESULTS:
LIQUID LIMIT 40
PLASTIC LIMIT 20
PLASTICITY INDEX 20

Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2 ( 1 42.2
42
Tare no. LOVE STAR SUN RDR EEI
IK
Tare ♦ Wet soil (g) 1710 17.20 17.50 15.80 1540
41
Tare * Dry soil (g) 14 10 14.30 1460 1420 14.10 40

a • 39 '3
Moisture loss 300 2.90 2 90 1.60 1 ill !
M
Tare weight 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7 00 n
:- M • W
Wt of dry soil 7.10 7.30 7.60 7.20 710
\
Moisture content 4225 39 73 3816 22 22 18.31 37
No. of blows 10 26 36 15 20 25 30
Number of Blows
Plate No. 12
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-2
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD B8
Sieve Oiameter Wt. Ret. Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 200.90
1/2 12.50 100 Moisture content [%) 16.87
3/8 9.50 14.20 9.25 91
10 2.00 26.20 17.07 60

200 0.075 29.60 19.28 20

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVt
LIMITS RESULTS:
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT 45 -i
Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2 44
Tare no
* 43
Tare + Wet soil (g)
|
c
42
Tare ♦ Dry soil (g)
Moisture loss K •
3
5 40
Tare weight o
Wt of dry soil 5 39
Moisture content 38
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
No. of blows
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, LL NON-PLASTIC Average : PL NON PLASTIC
Plate No. 13
Sangley Point, Cavite City ^_^
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-4
ASTM D 2216
3/8 9.50 17.60 10.80 89
10 2.00 22.10 13.56 62

200 0.075 35.40 21.72 21

LIMITS RESULTS:
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT IS i

Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
M
Tar,- no
43
Tare + Wet soil (g) I
43
c
Tare + Dry soil (g)
3 .11
Moisture loss
40
Tare weight
Wt of dry soil 39
Moisture content 38
No of blows 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 5
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, LL NON-PLASTIC Average: PL non-plastic
Plate No. 14
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-6
ASTM D 2216

1/2 12.50 100 Moisture content {%) 17.38

3/8 9.50 12.60 8.26 92
10 2.00 24.50 16.07 61

200 0.075 26.50 17.38 18

100
IOC
90
80
1 l\
^v
I 70 "\
13
a so
j SO t\ LIMITS RESULTS:
\
1 - Vss
30
V. PLASTIC LIMIT NON-PLASTIC
20
*• PLASTICITY INDEX NON-PLASTIC
10
10C 00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 0. M
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT 45 -I
Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
44
Tare no
43
Tare * Wet soil (g) c
42
Tare ♦ Dry soil (g) c
8 41
Moisture loss s
3
Tare weight 40
i
Wt of dry soil 39
Moisture content 38
No. of blows 10 IS 20 25 30 35 40 4
Number of Blows
Plate No. 15
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-8
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD C2
Sieve Diameter Wt Ret. Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 200.40
no (mm) (grams) Retained Passing finer diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 174.50
3/8 9.50 16.60 10.79 89
10 2.00 18.90 12.28 60

200 0.075 30.50 19.82 19

LIMITS RESULTS:

Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2 44
Tare no.
Tare + Wet soil (g)

5
c
43
S 42
Tare • Dry soil (g)
Moisture loss
j ..
Tare weight I 40
Wt of dry soil 5 39
Moisture content
No ol blows 10 IS 20 25 30 35 40 4 !
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, LL NON-PLASTIC Average: PL non-plastic
Plate No. 16
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-10
ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD C9


3/8 9.50 12.10 7.99 92
10 2.00 24.50 16.18 60
•10 0.425 32.80 21.66 39 Specific Gravity 2.57

200 0.075 28.90 19.09 19
PAN Unitweight,kg/cm3 1.88

LIMITS RESULTS:

Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
44
Tare no
* 43
rare ' Wet soil (g)
£C 42
Tare + Dry soil (g) o
Moisture loss s 41
Tare weight 3" 40
o
Wt of dry soil 5 39
Moisture content
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4
No. of blows
Number of Blows
Plate No. 17
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-12
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS(ASTM D421 AND D422) NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT

ASTM D 2216
MECHANICAL METHOD HYDROMETER METHOD C?
no (mm) (grams) Retained Passing finer diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 160.50
1 1/2 Moisture loss (gms) 37.90
1/2 12.50 Moisture content {%) 27.09

3/8 9.50
10 2.00 4.20 3.00 97

200 0.075 11.20 8.01 84
PAN Unit weight,kg/cm3 1.54

LIMITS RESULTS:
LIQUID LIMIT 39
PLASTIC LIMIT 20
PLASTICITY INDEX 19

Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
Tare no. SUN ASH IV BATO LOVE ^» 40.S4
40
Tare • Wet soil (g) 17.40 17.80 1780 1590 1530
~
Tare ♦ Dry soil (g) 14 40 14.80 14 90 14.20 14 10 39

3
Moisture loss 3.00 3.00 290 1 70 120 1 V^ 18.46
n
Tare weight 7.00 7.00 7 00 7.00 7.00
Wt of dry soil 7.40 7.80 7.90 7.20 7.10 36.71
Moisture content 40 S4 38.4b 3671 23.61 16.90

1
No. of blows 14 28 39 10 15 20 25 30 3S 40
Number of Blows
Liquid Limit, LL 38.90 Average: PL 20.26
Plate No. 18
BOREHOLE NO. BH-2
SAMPLE NO. SPT-14
ASTM D 2216
Sieve Diameter Wt Ret Percent Percent Percent Particle Tare + Wet soil (gms) 205.00
no. (mm) IRram S| Retained Passing finer diameter (mm) Tare + Dry soil (gms) 166.00
1/2 12.50 Moisture content (%) 26.99
3/8 9.50
10 2.00 4.10 2.84 97

200 0 075 13.60 9.41 82

100
90
80
^Tl\ If
*
1 to
1M
f M
LIMITS RESULTS:
1 • 30
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
38
20
20 PLASTICITY INDEX 18
10
0
IOC .00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 0. 90
Trial no. 1 2 3 1 2
Tare no. LOVE STAR SUN RDR EEI

40
Tare + Wet soil (g) 17.30 1730 1780 1620 15.20
1 39
c
Tare + Drysoil (g) 14 50 14.40 14.90 14.50 14.00
3
38
Moisture loss 3.00 2.90 2.90 1.70 1.20 e
37
Tare weight 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 • 36.71
I
Wt of dry soil 7 30 7.40 7.90 7.50 7.00
Moisture content 41.10 39.19 3671 22.67 17.14 35

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
No. of blows 10 ?\ )•".
Number of Blows
Plate No. 19
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOIL (ASTM D2166)
PROJECT : PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY

LOCATION : 1898 Avenue corner Cherry Street, Philippine Navy Naval Installation Command, Sangley Point, Cavite City
BOREHOLE No.: BH-1 SAMPLE NO.: SB-1 DEPTH (M): 15.00-15.50
TESTED BY: Mhanette C. Angeles CHECKED BY: Dominador R. Fermin, Jr.
DIMENSION OF SPECIMEN UNCONFINED FAILURE

SPECIMEN MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY
COMPRESSIVE STRAIN, e
CONDITION HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT(%) (g/cm3) (g/cm3)
STRENGHT (kg/cm2) (%)
12.00 6.00 31.65 1.592 0.740 1.900 1.209
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE
0.80
0.75
/O^^—oj,,
I
0.70 Deformation Load Dial
/ Dial Reading
0
IP)(k«)
0
0.65
10 0.66
0.60 25 1.10
50 1.54
♦ 0.559
0.55
75 2.20
1 100 2.64
0.50
BO
M 125 3.96
V 150 6.60
0.45 '
V :75 8 65
>
• 0.40 200 8.58

a.
E 250 8.47
3
0.35 300 0.00
9 0337
350 0.00
0.30
400 0.00
420 0.00
0.25
500 0.00
0.20 550 0.00
/0.188
600 0.00
0.15 650 0.00
yo.132
700 0.00
0.10
V0.094 750 0.00
;
0.05
/o.057 800 0.00
850 000
900 0.00
0. 90 0.S0 l.oo l.so 2 (XI Ufj 3. JO
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Plate No. 20

BOREHOLE No.: BH-1 SAMPLE NO.: SB 2 DEPTH (M): 17.00-17.50

CONDITION HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT [%) (g/cm*) (g/cm3)
12.00 6.00 31.38 1.580 0.670 1.910 1.203
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE
**• 0.659
0.65
Deformation Load Dial

0.60 Dial Reading IP)(kg)
*0.597
0 0
0.55 10 0.44
25 1 10
0.50 50 1.76
75 2.64
f 0.467
E 0.45 100 3.74
125 5.50
\
0.40 150 7.04
175 7.88
S 0.35 200 7.81
250 0.00
/o.319
0.30 300 0.00
350 0.00
0.25 400 0.00
/o.226 420 0.00
0.20 500 0.00
550 0.00
0.15 600 0.00
650 0.00
j
700 0.00
/o.094
750 0.00
800 0.00
/o.038
850 0.00
9O0 0.00
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Plate No. 21


CONDITION HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT (%) (g/cm3) (g/cm3)
12.00 6.00 31.71 1.580 0.370 1.900 1.200
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE
0.38
0.351 Deformation load Dial
Dial Reading (P) (kg)
0 0
10 0.33
25 0 66
50 0.99
75 1.32
100 1.76
125 2.53
150 3.41
175 4.33
200 4.29
250 4.18
300 0.00
350 0.00
400 0.00
470 0.00
500 0.00
550 0.00
600 0.00
650 0.00
700 0 00
750 0.00
800 0.00
850 0.00
900 0.00
0.00 0.000
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Plate No. 22


CONDITION HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT (%) (g/cm3) (g/cm3)
12.00 6.00 32.87 1.601 0.610 1.650 1.205
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE
•Tq £04^^
/ -**S39_. Q5M
Deformation Load Dial
Dial Reading IP)(kg)
0.55
0 0
#0.524
10 0.66
0.50
0.45
/ i 25
50
75
1.32
1.98
2.86
SP 0.40
/ 100
125
3.96
6.16
«» 035
/ : 150
175
7.13
708
40.337
200 7.04
| 0.30 250 0.00
0.25
/
/o.244
300
350
0.00
0.00
400 0.00
420 0.00
0.20
500 0.00
/o.l70 550 0.00
0.15
600 0.00
650 0.00
/o.ll3
700 0.00
750 0.00
0.05
/o.057 800 0.00
0.00
/
0.000
l 850
900
000
0.00
1 SCI
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 000
Plate No. 23
LOCATION : 1898 Avenue coner Cherry Street, Philippine Navy Naval Installation Command
BOREHOLENo.: BH-1 SAMPLE NO.: CS-3 DEPTH (M): 24.00-25.50
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF INTACT ROCK SPECIMENS (ASTM D2938)
DIMENSION OF SPECIMEN UNCONFINED

MOISTURE WET DENSITY FAILURE DRY DENSITY
SPECIMEN CONDITION COMPRESSIVE STRENGHT
HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT W(%) (f/cmJ) STRAIN, e, (X) (g/cm1)
(kg/cm2)
6.86 3.43 5.74 2.035 10.15 1.750 1.925
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE
10
•7****1" ^-»*9*W • 9.9141
I
Deformation load Dial
Dial Reading (P)(kg)
0 0
10 6.60
25 15.40
50 26.40
75 46.20
100 66.00
125 84.04
46.2929
150 105.60
175 105.38
200 105.16
250 0.00
^4.4174 300 0.00
350 0.00
400 0 00
420 0.00
1
500 0.00
42.S313 : 550 0.00
600 0.00
jturnm
| 650
700
750
0.00
0.00
0.00
/o.63S7
1 800
850
0.00
0.00
900 0.00
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Plate No. 24
BOREHOLE No.: BH-1 SAMPLE NO.: CS-5 DEPTH (M): 27.00-28.50
TESTED BY: Mhanette C. Angeles CHECKED BY: Dominador R. Fermin,Jr.

SPECIMEN CONDI!ION COMPRESSIVE STRENGHT
HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT \N[%) (g/cm1) STRAIN, e, (%) (g/cmJ)
(kg/cm2)
6.86 3.43 7.60 2.122 13.78 1.730 1.972
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE

Dial Reading (P)(kg)
0 0
10 11.00
25 22 00
50 44 00
75 66.00
100 88.00
125 110.00
150 143.00
175 142.78
200 142.56
250 0.00
300 0.00
350 0 00
400 0.00
420 0.00
500 0.00
550 0.00
600 0.00
650 0.00
700 0.00
750 0.00
800 0.00
850 0.00
900 0.00
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Plate No. 25
BOREHOLENo.: BH-2 SAMPLE NO.: CS-4 DEPTH (M): 27.00-28.50
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHOF INTACT ROCK SPECIMENS (ASTM D2938)

MOISTURE WET DENSITY FAILURE DRY DENSmr
HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT W(%) (g/cm5) STRAIN, e, (X) (g/cm5)
(kg/cm2)
6.86 3.43 7.14 2.130 12.30 1.720 1.988
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE
_j2
12
/ Deformation
Dial Reading
load Dial
(P)(kg)
11
0 0
/lO.S843
10 11.44
/
25 22.44
50 44 11
/ 75 66.44
M4CS5
100 89.10
125 111.32
150 128.70
01
£ 7 127.38
175
200 127.16
/6.3S27
i/>
2! 6 250 0.00
Q.
E
o / 300 0.00
350 0.00
/
400 0.00
M.2399
420 0.00
500 0.00
/ 550 0.00
/ 600 0.00
1<2.1S76 650 0.00
700 0.00
750 0.00
/ 800 0.00
850 0.00
900 0.00
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Mate No. 26
PROJECT: PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY
BOREHOLE No.: BH-2 SAMPLE NO.: CS-5 DEPTH (M): 28.50-30.00

HEIGHT, cm DIAMETER, cm CONTENT W(%) (g/cm5) STRAIN, e, (%) (g/cm5)
(kg/cm2)
6.86 3.43 6.25 2.146 12.40 1.750 2.019
REMARKS:
MODE OF FAILURE

Dial Reading IP)(kg)
0 0
10 11.66
25 22.88
SO 45.32
75 66 88
100 89.76
125 111.98
150 1 29 SO
175 129.58
200 129.36
250 0.00
300 0.00
350 0.00
400 0.00
420 0.00
500 0.00
550 0.00
600 0.00
650 0.00
700 0.00
750 0.00
800 0.00
850 0.00
900 0 00
950 0.00
Axial Strain, %
1000 0.00
Plate No. 27
BH-1 BH-2
On y>y/^/>y/>r/>YA m^< p?/>y/>?/X/X/x
5-
SILTY SAND
SILTY SAND
SILTY SAND
10-
5-
SILTY CLAY
Q
SILTY CLAY SILTY CLAY
Ld
20-
:<y*$.-
O;-:-
Q
25- TUFF ROCK

w*
TUFF ROCK
CI
TUFF ROCK
'-0-
\0:Q
30-
End Of Boring
IDEALIZED SOIL PROFILE
PLATE NO. 28
PROJECT: PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY, 1898 AVENUE CORNER
CHERRY STREET, PHILIPPINE NAVY NAVAL INSTALLATION COMMAND
SOIL BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Assume Footing Width, B = 1.0 meter (3.28 ft) minimum
Assume Footing Embedment, D = 1.0 meter (3.28 ft) minimum
Terzaqhi Soil Bearing Capacity Equation for cohesionless soil.
quit = q Nq + 0.5 y B Ny Sy
quit = Ultimate soil bearing capacity = psf
q = over burden pressure = psf
Design N-Value =19,Angle of internal friction, 0 =34°
Fr: Table 4-2
Nq = 36.5
Nv = 36.0
y = 1.76 g/cc = 109.8 psf
q =DY =3.28 (109.8) =360 psf
Sy =0.8 (Fr: Table 4-1)
quit =360(36.5) +0.5 (109.8) (3.28) (36) 0.8
= 18,326 psf
qall =gult=18.326 =6,108 psf=292 kpa say 290 kpa

F.S 3
Reference: Foundation Analysis and Design by Bowles
Plate No. 29
SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
Footing Dimension (B x L) = 1.0 meter x 1.0 meter
Footing Depth, D = 1.0 meter
AH = settlement = qo B11 - u2 m ls lf
Es
qo = qall = 290 kpa assuming the soil to be loaded to its allowable bearing
capacity
B1• L0 • 0.50 m
2
u = Poisson's ratio = 0.35
Es =Soil Modulus of Elasticity (Table 5-6) = 15 Mpa = 15,000 kpa
m =4 (with four contributing corners)

U = li + l-2u(b)
1-u
M = L= 1 N = D = 1.0 = 2.0
B B1 0.5
lf = D = 1.0 = 1.0
B 1.0
From: Table 5.2

|j = 0.285
l2 = 0.064
U=0.285 ♦( 1/^1)0.064=0.314
AH =290 (0.5) (1-0.352! (4) (0.314) (1.0) (1000)
15,000
= 10.65 mm
Reference: Foundation Analysis and Design by Bowles
Plate No. 30
DYNAMIC SOIL SPRING
(Footing = 1.0 meter x 1.0 meter)
1. Vertical Spring, k2
2LC1
K7 = S?
l-u
2. Horizontal Spring, kv
K -S —
*Y " ^ 2-u
Where:
Sz = factor computing vertical spring
10 A 2LX2B
=0.73 +1.54 (Jar ^=Vl=^T=1
= 2.27
L= 1.0 meter (100 cms)
Es= Modulus of Elasticity = 15 Mpa
u = Poisson's ratio = 0.35
Es 15 15
G1 = Shear - Strain ratio =
2 (1+U) 2 (1+.35) (2.70)
= 5.55 Mpa
= .55 KN/cm2
Sy= factor for computing horizontal spring
SY=4.5(Ja)038 =4.5
k2=2.272(;°_0)3y5) =384 KN/cm

ky= 4.5 2(12°0)3f) =300 KN/cm
Reference: Foundation Analysis and Design by Bowles.
Plate No.31
LIQUEFACTION
Type of soil = Medium to dense silty sand
Liquefaction Resistance = Average N value = 30
Estimated Relative Density, Dr = 65%
Remarks:
1. With liquefaction resistance of 30 and Relative Density of 65% the site is likely to
liquefy at maximum earthquake acceleration of 0.20g.
2. According to Philippine Institute of Volcanoiogy and Seismology the site is prone to

liquefaction.
References:
1. Liquefaction Studies by Seed &Idriss and Ohsaki & Kishida.

2. Foundation Analysis and Design by Bowles.
Plate No. 32
PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY, 1898 AVENUE CORNER
BH-1
PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY, 1898 AVENUE CORNER
BH-2

Soil Investigation Report 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soil Investigation Report 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

PROPOSED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY

This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation performed at

Naval Installation Command, Sangley Point, Cavite City.

and recommendations concerning the general subsurface conditions and the

foundations of the structures planned for construction at site.

2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

employing the wash boring method supplemented by rock coring. Borehole

locations are shown on Plate No. 1.

penetrations was taken as the standard penetration value denoted by N in the

shown in Plate No. 2.

3.0 LABORATORY TESTING

unconfined compression (ASTM D3188). Laboratory test results are shown on

Plate Nos. 6 to 35.

4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The detailed subsurface conditions including watertables are shown in the

5.1 Site Preparation and Grading

Existing vegetations in the areas to be graded shall be stripped and

disposed offsite. The exposed surface shall be brought to final subgrade

elevation compacted to at least 95.0%, level and non-yielding.

The site is almost on grade and site grading is very minimal.

5.2 Foundation Support

Structures planned for construction at the site investigated can be

supported by either isolated spread footings, strip footings or mat

depending upon the geometric constraints imposed by the architectural

Estimated settlement is 10.65mm. Please refer to Plate Nos. 29 and 30.

The estimated subsurface modulus is 40,695 KN/m .

beams to minimize differential settlements.

The immediate underlying subsurface soils has no plasticities and the

potential for volume change is very,minimal.

The site is likely to liquefy at maximum ground surface acceleration of

0.20g. Please refer to Plate No. 32.

5.5 Dynamic Soil Springs

Vertical, k2 = 384 KN/cm

Horizontal, kv = 300 KN/cm

Please refer to Plate No. 31

Structures to be constructed at the site shall be designed for Seismic

seismic source is > 15 km (Valley Fault Line) in accordance with the

National Structural Code of the Philippines, Volume 1, 6th Edition.

is limited to the specific project and location described herein and

investigation. Should there be appreciable differences in the subsurface

soils during construction the evaluator shall be notified and supplemental

recommendations will be issued.

Plate No. 1 Borehole Location Plan

2 Unified Soil Classification System

5 to 27 Laboratory Test Results

28 Idealized Soil Profile

DOMINADOR R. FERMIN, JR.

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

••• WELL-GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL

Wl LL (.HADED SANDS. GRAVELLY

SANDS WIT" I IN) |

sc I '"NOS. SAND-Cl AY MIX IUIII S

INORGANIC M' -FINE

FINE SILTS LIQUID LIMIT I OW l u MEDIUM

MORE THAN »0» SILTS

.'MUS, SWAMP SOILS

SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART

1. DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE CLASSIFICATIONS.

COHESIVE SOILS COHESIONLESS SOILS

(APPROXIMATE SHEARING VERY LOOSE THESE ARE USUALLY

SILTY CLAY;Gray, wet, low plasticity, 15

medium stiff, trace sand. (CL) , Sll-1

Hole Logged by: Elmer O. Estelon DATE: