Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Describe Jean’s professional ethical behavior in this scenario (when he accepted the
offer) based on the following ethical theories.
a. Kantianism Theory
b. Utilitarianism Theory
2
Scenario No. 2
A worm is a self-contained program that spreads through a computer network by taking
advantage of security holes in the computers connected to the network. In August 2003, the
Blaster worm infected many computers running the Windows 8 and Windows 10, operating
systems. The Blaster worm caused computers it infected to reboot every few minutes. Soon
another worm was exploiting the same security hole in Windows to spread through the Internet.
However, the purpose of the new worm, named Nachi, was benevolent. Since Nachi took
advantage of the same security hole as Blaster, it could not infect computers that were immune to
the Blaster worm.
Once Nachi gained access to a computer with the security hole, it located and destroyed copies
of the Blaster worm. It also automatically downloaded from Microsoft a patch to the operating
system software that would fix the security problem. Finally, it used the computer as a launching
pad to seek out other Windows PCs with the security hole.
Using the following theories, was the action of the person who released the Nachi worm
morally right or wrong?
a. Social contract theory (Hint: First you assume a rule or contract and then based on
that figure out the action was right or wrong)
b. Deontology
c. Utilitarianism
3
Scenario No. 3:
In analyzing the following scenario, describe how an act utilitarian, a rule utilitarian,
deontologist (using 1st and 2nd categorical imperative) would each reach a solution to this
dilemma. Which solution seems most plausible?
You have just been appointed to the board of directors of XYZ.com. Unfortunately, the dot-com
company has been experiencing some difficult financial times, resulting in revenue losses in
three of the last four quarters. As you assume your new position, you discover that two proposals
are on the table. Each proposal has been put forth as a means for dealing with XYZ’s immediate
financial problems.
Proposal #1 recommends that all employees be retained, but that an immediate freeze on salary
increases (raises) for all employees be imposed for the next six months. (Employees may even be
asked to take a 5% cut in pay if things do not improve by the end of that period.)
Proposal #2 recommends that wages not be frozen, but that 5% of the XYZ’s work force be laid
off. (One piece of reasoning behind this proposal is that taking more drastic measures will
“protect” 95% of XYZ’s workers and will send a message to Wall Street and local investors that
XYZ is serious about improving its financial position and that it will soon be a stable company
once again.) The board is evenly split, seven members favoring proposal# 1 and seven favoring
proposal #2. Yours will be the tie-breaking vote. 2.