You are on page 1of 14

Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌ 

Executive‌S
‌ ummary‌ 
October 2021 Social  media‌  is  democratizing‌consumer
    influence,‌empowering‌ordinary‌individuals
     
to shape‌  brand  perception.‌  We  identify‌  brands  with‌  strong‌  positioning‌  using‌  social
Kai Wu media‌discourse‌and‌network‌structure.‌We‌‌
           find‌‌ strong‌‌ brands have outperformed the‌‌ 
Founder & Chief Investment Officer stock‌m
‌ arket.‌W‌ e also‌e‌ xplore the trends of‌s‌ ustainable and‌M‌ illennial‌b‌ rands.‌ 
kai@sparklinecapital.com
 ‌
However,‌not     all‌customers
    are  created‌equal.
   In‌the‌‌
   creator‌ 
Democratizing‌‌Influence‌  economy,  some‌wield
    undue  influence.‌Influential
   bloggers,‌‌ 
Mad‌‌Men’s‌‌Demise‌  YouTube  stars,‌  Instagram  influencers,‌  and‌  popular‌podcast
 
hosts‌  can reach‌  audiences of‌  millions.‌  Moreover,‌  they‌  are
“Change is‌n‌ either‌g‌ ood nor‌b‌ ad.‌I‌ t‌s‌ imply‌i‌ s.” often perceived  as  more  authentic,  credible,‌  and‌  relatable
📺 Don‌D‌ raper than‌t‌ he‌b‌ rands themselves.‌ 
 

The‌  modern‌  history‌  of‌  branding began  in  the‌  early  1900s‌‌  In‌the‌social‌media
        age,‌brand
   perception arises‌‌ emergently‌‌ 
with‌‌ the‌‌ rise‌of‌‌
   mass‌media
   --‌‌ print,‌‌ radio and‌television.‌‌
   The from  the‌conversations‌of‌millions‌of‌individual‌consumers.‌
             
advertising  industry‌  rose  to  prominence  with‌iconic     brands Brands can no‌  longer count on‌  their customers  sitting  at
such‌  as Coca-Cola, Campbell’s Soup,  and‌  Quaker  Oats.‌  In‌  home‌  staring‌  at the‌  TV‌  absorbing‌  corporate messaging.‌‌ 
particular,‌  the‌  unprecedented  reach‌  and‌  creative  flexibility Instead,‌  they‌  must proactively  spark  engagement‌  through
of‌T‌ V‌a‌ dvertising helped‌t‌ urn‌b‌ rands into household names.‌  viral marketing‌o‌ r‌b‌ y entering the‌f‌ ray themselves.‌ 
 ‌
In‌the‌past
      few‌decades,‌‌
   technology‌‌ has‌‌ once again ushered Exhibit‌2
‌  ‌
in‌a‌‌
   wave of‌‌ change.‌The‌‌
   internet is empowering‌consumers.‌
    #Burn‌‌ 🔥
Access‌  to  the‌  world’s  knowledge  on‌  sites  like  Google,‌  Yelp
and‌  Amazon  is  breaking‌  down  informational‌  asymmetries.‌‌ 
Meanwhile,‌  e-commerce  is‌giving‌consumers
      a‌much‌larger‌‌
     
and‌m‌ ore diverse‌s‌ election of‌p‌ roducts.‌ 

Yet‌  the‌  most empowering‌  trend is  the  democratization‌  of‌‌ 


consumer influence.‌  Purchase decisions‌  are  based  on‌  the‌‌ 
wisdom‌  of‌  the‌  crowd  rather‌  than‌  that  of‌  Don‌  Draper.‌  The‌‌ 
customer‌  is‌  truly‌  king‌  when‌he
    can  persuade  thousands‌of‌‌    
others by posting his buying‌e‌ xperience online.

Exhibit‌1
‌  ‌ ‌
Influencers:‌T ‌ hen‌a
‌ nd‌N
‌ ow‌ 
Source:‌Twitter.‌ 

While‌brand
    perception is no‌longer
   tightly controlled‌‌ by the‌‌ 
suits  on‌Madison‌Ave,‌brands
       are not powerless.‌‌ Savvy‌firms‌‌
   
have merely shifted their resources to digital, social, and‌ 
influencer  marketing.‌While‌the‌internet‌may‌‌
         have killed‌‌ the
Mad‌M‌ en,‌t‌ he‌i‌ ndustry‌a‌ s‌a‌ ‌w
‌ hole is‌t‌ hriving.

Source:‌AMC,‌Instagram,‌Sparkline.‌ 

1‌ 
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Customer‌‌is‌‌King(maker)‌‌ 👑  ‌ ‌ Brand‌‌Personality‌  ‌
“Your‌  ‌brand‌  ‌is‌  ‌what‌  ‌other‌  ‌people‌  ‌say‌‌  about‌‌  you‌‌  when‌‌ 
you’re‌n‌ ot‌i‌ n‌t‌ he‌r‌ oom.”‌  ‌ Brand‌‌Personality‌  ‌
📚 ‌‌Jeff‌B‌ ezos,‌A‌ mazon‌F‌ ounder‌  ‌
 
Marketers‌  ‌have‌  ‌long‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌that‌  ‌people‌  ‌prefer‌  ‌brands‌‌ 
 ‌ that‌  ‌reflect‌  ‌their‌  ‌identities.‌  ‌Brands‌  ‌give‌  ‌us‌  ‌the‌  ‌ability‌  ‌to‌‌ 
With‌  ‌the‌‌  democratization‌‌  of‌‌  consumer‌‌  influence,‌‌  the‌‌  image‌‌  manifest‌  ‌our‌  ‌desired‌  ‌values‌  ‌and‌  ‌personality‌  ‌traits.‌  ‌In‌  ‌fact,‌‌ 
brand‌  ‌managers‌  ‌hope‌  ‌to‌  ‌project‌  ‌is‌  ‌irrelevant.‌  ‌We‌  ‌want‌  ‌to‌‌  many‌‌  researchers‌‌  even‌‌ believe‌‌ that‌‌ brands‌‌ themselves‌‌ have‌‌ 
know‌‌  what‌‌ actual‌‌ customers‌‌ are‌‌ saying‌‌ when‌‌ brands‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌  personalities.‌  ‌
in‌t‌ he‌r‌ oom.‌W‌ e‌n‌ eed‌t‌ o‌b‌ e‌i‌ n‌t‌ he‌r‌ oom‌w ‌ here‌i‌ t‌h‌ appens.‌🚪 ‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ Firms‌‌  craft‌‌  their‌‌  brand‌‌ personalities‌‌ to‌‌ appeal‌‌ to‌‌ their‌‌ target‌‌ 
The‌  ‌internet‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌big‌  ‌place‌  ‌--‌  ‌where‌  ‌should‌  ‌we‌  ‌focus‌  ‌our‌‌  customers.‌‌  A ‌‌perfect‌‌  example‌‌  is‌‌  Apple’s‌‌  prolific‌‌  “Get‌‌  a ‌‌Mac”‌‌ 
attention?‌  ‌Below‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rough‌  ‌estimate‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌distribution‌‌  of‌‌  advertising‌‌ campaign,‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ two‌‌ actors‌‌ ‌literally‌ p‌ ortrayed‌‌ 
brand-related‌‌  chatter‌‌  across‌‌  major‌‌  websites.‌‌ The‌‌ bulk‌‌ takes‌‌  a‌‌  Mac‌‌  and‌‌  a ‌‌PC.‌‌  Apple‌‌  imbued‌‌  its‌‌  Mac‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌young,‌‌ casual,‌‌ 
place‌‌  on‌‌  Facebook,‌‌  Twitter,‌‌  and‌‌  Reddit,‌‌ although‌‌ this‌‌ varies‌‌  and‌  ‌trendy‌  ‌personality,‌  ‌while‌  ‌it‌  ‌presented‌‌  the‌‌  PC‌‌  as‌‌  stuffy,‌‌ 
widely‌  ‌by‌  ‌product‌  ‌(e.g.,‌‌  Lululemon‌‌  is‌‌  much‌‌  more‌‌  active‌‌  on‌‌  unattractive‌a‌ nd‌n‌ erdy.‌  ‌
Instagram,‌J‌ etBlue‌o‌ n‌T‌ witter‌‌and‌K‌ raft‌o‌ n‌F‌ acebook).‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ Exhibit‌4 ‌  ‌ ‌
Exhibit‌3‌  ‌ ‌ Hello,‌‌I’m‌a ‌ ‌M
‌ ac‌  ‌
The‌(‌ Chat)room‌W
‌ here‌I‌ t‌H
‌ appens‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌G‌ oogle,‌F‌ acebook,‌T‌ witter,‌R‌ eddit,‌A‌ mazon,‌S‌ parkline.‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ Source:‌A‌ pple,‌S‌ parkline.‌  ‌
This‌‌  paper‌‌  will‌‌  focus‌‌  on‌‌  Twitter‌‌  for‌‌  three‌‌  reasons.‌‌  First,‌‌  it‌‌  is‌‌   ‌
one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌top‌  ‌three‌  ‌forums‌  ‌for‌  ‌brand-related‌  ‌discussion.‌‌  The‌‌  research‌‌  on‌‌  brand‌‌  personality‌‌ begins‌‌ with‌‌ ‌Aaker‌‌ (1997)‌, ‌‌
Second,‌‌  we‌‌  can‌‌  enrich‌‌  our‌‌ analysis‌‌ using‌‌ the‌‌ social‌‌ graph‌‌ of‌‌  who‌  ‌defines‌  ‌five‌  ‌dimensions‌  ‌of‌  ‌brand‌  ‌personality.‌  ‌These‌‌ 
Twitter.‌‌  Third,‌‌  the‌‌  Twitter‌‌  API‌‌  is‌‌  far‌‌  less‌‌  restrictive‌‌  than‌‌ that‌‌  dimensions‌‌  emerge‌‌  from‌‌ factor‌‌ analysis‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌survey‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ 
of‌F‌ acebook‌a‌ nd‌I‌ nstagram.‌  ‌ participants‌  ‌were‌  ‌asked‌  ‌to‌  ‌rank‌  ‌40‌  ‌popular‌  ‌brands‌  ‌on‌  ‌114‌‌ 
 ‌ personality‌  ‌traits.‌  ‌Aaker‌  ‌found‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌top‌  ‌five‌  ‌principal‌‌ 
While‌  ‌social‌  ‌media‌‌  do‌‌  have‌‌  some‌‌  well-known‌‌  biases,‌‌  these‌‌  components‌  ‌explained‌  ‌over‌  ‌90%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌variance‌  ‌in‌  ‌brand‌‌ 
are‌  ‌diminishing‌  ‌with‌  ‌broader‌  ‌internet‌  ‌adoption.‌  ‌Moreover,‌‌  personality.‌  ‌These‌  ‌components‌  ‌are:‌  ‌sincerity‌, ‌ ‌excitement‌, ‌‌
the‌‌  costs‌‌  of‌‌  using‌‌  digital‌‌  datasets‌‌  are‌‌  far‌‌  outweighed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  competence‌,‌s‌ ophistication‌‌a‌ nd‌r‌ uggedness‌. ‌ ‌
benefits,‌  ‌especially‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌traditional‌  ‌studies,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌   ‌
those‌t‌ hat‌r‌ ely‌o‌ n‌s‌ mall-sample‌s‌ urveys‌o‌ f‌c‌ ollege‌s‌ tudents.‌  ‌

2‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌5
‌  ‌ ‌ Once‌  ‌we‌  ‌have‌  ‌trained‌  ‌the‌  ‌embeddings,‌  ‌we‌  ‌seed‌  ‌five‌  ‌word‌‌ 
Dimensions‌o ‌ f‌B
‌ rand‌P
‌ ersonality‌  ‌ clusters‌  ‌using‌  ‌the‌  ‌keywords‌  ‌from‌  ‌Aaker’s‌  ‌taxonomy.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
visualization‌  ‌below‌  ‌plots‌  ‌words‌  ‌that‌  ‌fall‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specified‌‌ 
distance‌‌  from‌‌  each‌‌ seed‌‌ group.‌‌ The‌‌ five‌‌ factors‌‌ form‌‌ distinct‌‌ 
clusters,‌i‌ mplying‌t‌ hey‌a‌ re‌i‌ ndeed‌r‌ easonably‌i‌ ndependent.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌6‌  ‌ ‌
Brand‌E‌ mbeddings‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌A‌ aker‌(‌ 1997)‌,‌S‌ parkline.‌  ‌
 ‌
Over‌  ‌the‌  ‌past‌  ‌two‌  ‌decades,‌  ‌several‌  ‌other‌‌  researchers‌‌  have‌‌ 
found‌‌  Aaker’s‌‌  taxonomy‌‌  to‌‌  be‌‌  quite‌‌  stable‌‌  both‌‌ across‌‌ time‌‌ 
and‌p‌ roduct‌c‌ ategories‌(‌ e.g.,‌t‌ oothpastes,‌s‌ oups,‌T‌ Vs).‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌Embeddings‌  ‌  ‌
In‌‌  ‌Measuring‌‌  Culture‌‌  (Aug‌‌  2021)‌, ‌‌we‌‌ laid‌‌ out‌‌ a ‌‌methodology‌‌  Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
for‌  ‌creating‌  ‌“company‌  ‌culture‌‌  profiles.”‌‌  We‌‌  used‌‌  Glassdoor‌‌  The‌  ‌next‌  ‌exhibit‌  ‌zooms‌  ‌in‌  ‌on‌  ‌some‌  ‌top‌  ‌phrases.‌  ‌We‌  ‌find‌‌ 
reviews‌‌  to‌‌  assign‌‌  firms‌‌  scores‌‌  on‌‌  each‌‌  of‌‌  seven‌‌  dimensions‌‌  many‌‌  intuitive‌‌  but‌‌  non-obvious‌‌ word‌‌ combinations,‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ 
of‌c‌ ompany‌c‌ ulture‌(‌ e.g.,‌i‌ nnovation,‌i‌ ntegrity,‌t‌ eamwork).‌  ‌ “not‌  ‌all‌  ‌heroes‌  ‌wear‌  ‌capes”‌  ‌for‌‌  ‌sincerity‌  ‌and‌‌  “made‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌ 
 ‌ USA”‌  ‌for‌  ‌ruggedness‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌embeddings‌  s‌ eem‌  ‌to‌  ‌accurately‌‌ 
We‌  ‌can‌  ‌repurpose‌  ‌this‌  ‌method‌  ‌to‌‌  build‌‌  “brand‌‌  personality‌‌  capture‌t‌ he‌e‌ ssence‌o‌ f‌b‌ rand‌p‌ ersonality.‌  ‌
profiles.”‌‌  We‌‌  only‌‌  need‌‌  to‌‌  make‌‌ two‌‌ modifications.‌‌ First,‌‌ we‌‌   ‌
measure‌  ‌the‌  ‌dimensions‌  ‌of‌  ‌brand‌  ‌personality‌  ‌rather‌  ‌than‌‌  Exhibit‌7
‌  ‌ ‌
company‌  ‌culture.‌  ‌Second,‌  ‌we‌  ‌train‌  ‌our‌  ‌model‌  ‌on‌  ‌Twitter‌‌  Brand‌P‌ ersonality‌K
‌ eywords‌  ‌
instead‌o‌ f‌G‌ lassdoor.‌  ‌
 ‌
Following‌  ‌the‌  ‌procedure‌‌  laid‌‌  out‌‌  in‌‌  our‌‌  last‌‌  paper,‌‌  we‌‌  start‌‌ 
by‌  ‌training‌  ‌word‌  ‌embeddings.‌  ‌Word‌  ‌embeddings‌  ‌encode‌‌ 
words‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌dense‌‌  matrix,‌‌  where‌‌  the‌‌  distance‌‌  between‌‌  pairs‌‌ 
of‌  ‌words‌  ‌corresponds‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌similarity.‌  ‌For‌  ‌example,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
words‌  ‌“customer”‌  ‌and‌  ‌“client”‌  ‌have‌  ‌similar‌  ‌meanings‌  ‌and‌‌ 
thus‌a‌ re‌n‌ ear‌‌each‌o‌ ther‌i‌ n‌e‌ mbedding‌s‌ pace.‌  ‌
 ‌
Social‌  ‌media‌  ‌text‌  ‌presents‌  ‌a ‌ ‌couple‌  ‌of‌  ‌unique‌  ‌challenges.‌‌ 
First,‌  ‌since‌  ‌its‌‌  vernacular‌‌  can‌‌  vary‌‌  widely‌‌  by‌‌  topic,‌‌  we‌‌  train‌‌ 
our‌‌  model‌‌  only‌‌  on‌‌  brand-related‌‌  chatter‌‌  to‌‌  help‌‌ reduce‌‌ this‌‌ 
noise.‌‌  Second,‌‌  since‌‌  social‌‌  media‌‌  slang‌‌  rapidly‌‌ changes,‌‌ we‌‌ 
retrain‌  ‌our‌  ‌models‌  ‌on‌  ‌rolling‌‌  two-year‌‌  periods‌‌  and‌‌  include‌‌ 
combinations‌  ‌of‌  ‌words‌  ‌(n-grams)‌  ‌to‌  ‌capture‌  ‌emerging‌‌ 
idioms,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌“weekend‌  ‌warrior,”‌  ‌“side‌‌  hustle,”‌‌  and‌‌  “boy‌‌   ‌
shorts.”‌  ‌ Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
3‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Once‌‌  we‌‌  are‌‌  satisfied‌‌  with‌‌  our‌‌  model,‌‌  we‌‌  use‌‌  it‌‌  to‌‌  measure‌‌  Follower‌‌Overlap‌  ‌
the‌  ‌personality‌  ‌of‌  ‌each‌  ‌brand.‌  ‌The‌  ‌next‌  ‌exhibit‌  ‌shows‌‌ 
chatter‌  ‌about‌  ‌Tiffany‌  ‌& ‌ ‌Co.‌  ‌While‌  ‌some‌  ‌words‌  ‌are‌  ‌merely‌‌  “Birds‌o‌ f‌a‌ ‌f‌ eather‌‌flock‌t‌ ogether.”‌🐦 ‌  ‌ ‌
descriptive‌  ‌(e.g.,‌  ‌“necklace”),‌  ‌many‌  ‌others‌  ‌relate‌  ‌to‌  ‌brand‌‌   ‌
personality.‌  T‌ he‌  ‌prevalence‌  ‌of‌  ‌words‌  ‌like‌  ‌“luxury,”‌  ‌“bling,”‌‌  While‌  ‌embeddings‌  ‌provide‌  ‌an‌  ‌effective‌  ‌way‌  ‌to‌  ‌measure‌‌ 
“exquisite,”‌  ‌and‌  ‌“timeless”‌  ‌indicate‌  ‌high‌  ‌sophistication‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌  brand‌‌  personality,‌‌  the‌‌  social‌‌  graph‌‌  of‌‌ Twitter‌‌ enables‌‌ a ‌‌very‌‌ 
addition,‌  ‌phrases‌‌  such‌‌  as‌‌  “true‌‌  love”‌‌  and‌‌  “excited”‌‌  suggest‌‌  different‌‌  approach.‌‌  This‌‌  technique‌‌  leverages‌‌ the‌‌ homophily‌‌ 
secondary‌t‌ raits‌o‌ f‌s‌ incerity‌‌a‌ nd‌e‌ xcitement‌. ‌ ‌ principle,‌‌  which‌‌  is‌‌  the‌‌  tendency‌‌  for‌‌  individuals‌‌  to‌‌  associate‌‌ 
 ‌ with‌‌  similar‌‌  others.‌‌  We‌‌  can‌‌ learn‌‌ a ‌‌lot‌‌ about‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
Exhibit‌8
‌  ‌ ‌ company‌s‌ he‌k‌ eeps.‌  ‌
Tiffany‌&‌ ‌C‌ o‌  ‌  ‌
More‌  ‌precisely,‌  ‌we‌  ‌can‌  ‌compute‌  ‌the‌  ‌similarity‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌two‌‌ 
accounts‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌overlap‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌followers.‌  ‌For‌‌ 
example,‌‌  there‌‌  is‌‌  high‌‌  overlap‌‌  between‌‌  the‌‌  followers‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ 
World‌  ‌Wildlife‌  ‌Fund‌  ‌and‌  ‌Patagonia.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌‌  because‌‌  people‌‌ 
who‌  ‌care‌  ‌about‌  ‌the‌  ‌environment‌  ‌are‌  ‌likely‌  ‌to‌  ‌follow‌  ‌both‌‌ 
WWF‌  ‌and‌  ‌Patagonia.‌  ‌In‌  ‌contrast,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌less‌  ‌overlap‌‌ 
between‌t‌ he‌f‌ ollowers‌o‌ f‌W ‌ WF‌a‌ nd‌E‌ xxonMobil.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 0‌  ‌
Follower‌O‌ verlap‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
The‌‌  radar‌‌  chart‌‌  below‌‌  compares‌‌  Tiffany‌‌  & ‌‌Co‌‌  to‌‌ a ‌‌few‌‌ other‌‌ 
brands.‌‌  First‌‌  Republic‌‌  Bank‌‌  is‌‌  seen‌‌  as‌‌  ‌competent‌, ‌‌Christian‌‌ 
Mingle‌a‌ s‌s‌ incere‌,‌a‌ nd‌W‌ D-40‌a‌ s‌r‌ ugged‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌9
‌  ‌ ‌
Brand‌P‌ ersonality‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
In‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌this‌  ‌technique,‌  ‌we‌  ‌first‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌define‌‌ 
representative‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌brand‌  ‌personality‌‌ 
dimensions.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌our‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌embedding‌  ‌seed‌‌ 
words.‌  ‌We‌  ‌implement‌  ‌a ‌ ‌modified‌  ‌version‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌method‌‌ 
from‌  ‌Culotta‌  ‌and‌‌  Cutler‌‌  (2016)‌, ‌‌which‌‌  mines‌‌  Twitter‌‌  lists‌‌  to‌‌ 
find‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌associated‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌given‌  ‌topic.‌  ‌For‌  ‌each‌‌ 
dimension,‌  ‌this‌  ‌produces‌‌  30‌‌  to‌‌  80‌‌  seed‌‌  accounts‌‌  owned‌‌  by‌‌ 
celebrities,‌‌  media‌‌ outlets,‌‌ influencers,‌‌ agencies,‌‌ non-profits,‌‌ 
 ‌ and‌b‌ rands.‌  ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌

4‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 1‌  ‌ provides‌‌  some‌‌  reassurance‌‌ that‌‌ we‌‌ are‌‌ accurately‌‌ extracting‌‌ 
Seed‌A
‌ ccounts‌  ‌ brand‌  ‌personality.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌since‌  ‌both‌  ‌approaches‌  ‌have‌‌ 
their‌  ‌own‌  ‌strengths,‌  ‌we‌  ‌combine‌  ‌them‌  ‌to‌  ‌create‌  ‌an‌  ‌even‌‌ 
more‌r‌ obust‌b‌ rand‌p‌ ersonality‌c‌ omposite.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exploring‌B
‌ rand‌‌Personality‌  ‌
We‌‌  can‌‌  now‌‌  begin‌‌  our‌‌  exploration‌‌  of‌‌  brand‌‌  personality.‌‌  We‌‌ 
will‌  ‌restrict‌  ‌our‌  ‌universe‌  ‌to‌  ‌consumer‌  ‌brands‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌or‌‌ 
have‌  ‌been‌  ‌owned‌  ‌by‌  ‌publicly-traded‌  ‌companies.‌  ‌This‌  ‌will‌‌ 
allow‌  ‌us‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌backtests‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌stock‌  ‌market‌‌ 
performance‌o‌ f‌b‌ rand-related‌f‌ actors.‌  ‌
 ‌
We‌  ‌will‌  ‌start‌  ‌by‌  ‌surveying‌  ‌a ‌ ‌few‌  ‌major‌  ‌consumer‌  ‌product‌‌ 
categories.‌  ‌We‌‌  find‌‌  that‌‌  some‌‌  industries‌‌  tend‌‌  to‌‌  emphasize‌‌ 
certain‌  ‌personality‌  ‌traits.‌  ‌Apparel‌  ‌brands‌  ‌tend‌  ‌to‌  ‌exude‌‌ 
sophistication‌, ‌ ‌consumer‌  ‌finance‌‌  firms‌‌  project‌‌  an‌‌  image‌‌  of‌‌ 
competence‌,‌a‌ nd‌r‌ estaurants‌e‌ mphasize‌s‌ incerity‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌  ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 3‌  ‌
 ‌ Product‌C ‌ ategory‌A
‌ verages‌  ‌
These‌  ‌seed‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌embody‌  ‌each‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌five‌‌  dimensions.‌‌ 
Sincerity‌  ‌is‌  ‌represented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌American‌  ‌heartland‌  ‌(e.g.,‌‌ 
country‌  ‌music‌  ‌and‌  ‌farming).‌‌  ‌Competence‌  ‌is‌‌  symbolized‌‌  by‌‌ 
scientific‌  ‌and‌  ‌academic‌  ‌expertise.‌  ‌Ruggedness‌  ‌is‌  ‌reflected‌‌ 
by‌t‌ he‌g‌ reat‌o‌ utdoors.‌  ‌
 ‌
Next,‌  ‌we‌  ‌compute‌  ‌follower‌‌  overlap‌‌  between‌‌  seed‌‌  accounts‌‌ 
and‌  ‌brands.‌  ‌For‌  ‌example,‌  ‌we‌  ‌first‌  ‌compute‌  ‌the‌  ‌overlap‌  ‌of‌‌ 
@YETICoolers‌  ‌with‌  ‌each‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ruggedness‌  ‌seed‌‌  accounts.‌‌ 
We‌  ‌take‌  ‌the‌  ‌average‌  ‌to‌  ‌arrive‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌composite‌  ‌ruggedness‌ ‌
score.‌W ‌ e‌t‌ hen‌r‌ epeat‌f‌ or‌‌the‌o‌ ther‌f‌ our‌d‌ imensions.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 2‌  ‌
Follower‌O‌ verlap‌E
‌ xample‌  ‌
 ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
However,‌  ‌as‌  ‌with‌  ‌human‌  ‌personality,‌  ‌individual‌  ‌variation‌ 
dominates‌  ‌group‌  ‌averages.‌  ‌The‌  ‌next‌  ‌exhibit‌  ‌shows‌  ‌brands‌‌ 
that‌  ‌score‌  ‌highly‌‌  on‌‌  each‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  five‌‌  dimensions.‌‌  There‌‌  is‌‌  a ‌‌
wide‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌product‌  ‌categories‌  ‌represented.‌  ‌Sincerity‌  ‌is‌‌ 
manifested‌  ‌in‌  ‌restaurants,‌  ‌cereals‌  ‌and‌  ‌even‌  ‌motorcycles.‌‌ 
Excitement‌‌c‌ an‌b‌ e‌f‌ ound‌i‌ n‌c‌ ars,‌c‌ ameras‌a‌ nd‌w ‌ ebsites.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
This‌‌  gives‌‌  us‌‌ a ‌‌five-dimensional‌‌ brand‌‌ personality‌‌ profile‌‌ for‌‌ 
every‌‌  brand‌‌  in‌‌  our‌‌  universe.‌‌  The‌‌  results‌‌  are‌‌  similar‌‌ (but‌‌ not‌‌ 
identical)‌‌  to‌‌  those‌‌  produced‌‌  by‌‌ the‌‌ brand‌‌ embeddings.‌‌ This‌‌ 
5‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌1
Top‌B
‌ 4‌  ‌
‌ rand‌P ‌ ersonalities‌  ‌
Brand‌‌Positioning‌  ‌
Brand‌‌Mapping‌  ‌
“The‌  ‌way‌  ‌a ‌ ‌company‌  ‌brands‌  ‌itself‌  ‌is‌‌  everything.‌‌  It‌‌  will‌‌ 
ultimately‌d‌ ecide‌w ‌ hether‌‌a‌b‌ usiness‌s‌ urvives.”‌  ‌
🚀 ‌R‌ ichard‌B‌ ranson,‌V‌ irgin‌G‌ roup‌F‌ ounder‌  ‌
 

 ‌
Brand‌  ‌mapping‌  ‌is‌‌  a ‌‌popular‌‌  tool‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌  marketing‌‌  industry.‌‌ 
The‌‌ idea‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ map‌‌ out‌‌ the‌‌ competitive‌‌ landscape‌‌ to‌‌ see‌‌ how‌‌ 
one’s‌  ‌brand‌  ‌is‌  ‌positioned‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌competitors.‌  ‌Brand‌ 
maps‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌‌  identify‌‌  gaps‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌  market,‌‌  potential‌‌ 
strategic‌  ‌partners‌  ‌and‌  ‌crowded‌  ‌segments‌  ‌to‌  ‌avoid.‌  ‌Newer‌‌ 
brands‌  ‌in‌  ‌particular‌  ‌should‌  ‌think‌  ‌twice‌  ‌before‌  ‌positioning‌‌ 
themselves‌d‌ irectly‌a‌ gainst‌m ‌ ore‌e‌ stablished‌c‌ ompetitors.‌  ‌
 ‌
While‌  ‌brand‌  ‌is‌  ‌multidimensional,‌  ‌marketers‌  ‌usually‌  ‌select‌‌ 
 ‌ just‌‌  two‌‌  dimensions‌‌  for‌‌  visualization.‌‌  The‌‌ brand‌‌ map‌‌ below‌‌ 
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
rates‌‌  apparel‌‌  brands‌‌  on‌‌  ‌sophistication‌ ‌and‌‌ ‌ruggedness‌. ‌‌We‌‌ 
Our‌‌ analysis‌‌ also‌‌ reveals‌‌ that‌‌ brand‌‌ personality‌‌ is‌‌ malleable.‌‌  draw‌c‌ ircle‌s‌ ize‌b‌ ased‌o‌ n‌T‌ witter‌‌follower‌c‌ ount.‌  ‌
Instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌using‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌sample,‌  ‌we‌  ‌continually‌  ‌re-train‌‌   ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 6‌  ‌
our‌  ‌model‌  ‌on‌  ‌rolling‌  ‌two-year‌  ‌periods.‌  ‌This‌  ‌allows‌  ‌us‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Apparel‌B ‌ rand‌M
‌ ap‌  ‌
track‌t‌ he‌e‌ volution‌o‌ f‌b‌ rands,‌s‌ uch‌a‌ s‌Y‌ ETI.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 5‌  ‌
The‌A
‌ scent‌o ‌ f‌Y
‌ ETI‌  ‌

Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌


 ‌
We‌  ‌find‌  ‌a ‌ ‌strong‌  ‌inverse‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌between‌  ‌ruggedness‌ ‌
 ‌ and‌  ‌sophistication‌. ‌ ‌Luxury‌  ‌brands‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌Versace‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌ Jimmy‌  ‌Choo‌  ‌anchor‌  ‌one‌  ‌end‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  spectrum‌‌  and‌‌  outdoor‌‌ 
 ‌ brands‌  ‌like‌  ‌Rocky‌‌  Boots‌‌  and‌‌  Mountain‌‌  Hardwear‌‌  the‌‌  other.‌‌ 
YETI‌‌  sells‌‌  expensive‌‌  coolers‌‌  (some‌‌  upward‌‌  of‌‌  $500).‌‌ Started‌‌  Meanwhile,‌  ‌Canada‌  ‌Goose‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌some‌  ‌extent‌  ‌Lululemon‌‌ 
by‌‌  two‌‌ Texan‌‌ outdoorsman‌‌ brothers,‌‌ YETI‌‌ has‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ years‌‌  have‌t‌ ried‌t‌ o‌a‌ ppeal‌o‌ n‌b‌ oth‌d‌ imensions.‌  ‌
established‌  ‌itself‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌aspirational‌  ‌brand‌  ‌through‌  ‌clever‌‌   ‌
marketing‌‌  (e.g.,‌‌ YouTube‌‌ testimonials).‌‌ Its‌‌ success‌‌ creating‌‌ a ‌‌  ‌
high-end‌r‌ eputation‌s‌ hows‌i‌ n‌i‌ ts‌r‌ ising‌s‌ ophistication‌‌s‌ core.‌  ‌    ‌
6‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
In‌‌  order‌‌  to‌‌  visualize‌‌  all‌‌  five‌‌  dimensions‌‌ of‌‌ brand‌‌ personality‌‌  While‌  ‌having‌  ‌a ‌‌well-defined‌‌  brand‌‌  personality‌‌  is‌‌  necessary,‌‌ 
simultaneously,‌  ‌we‌  ‌use‌  ‌a ‌ ‌technique‌‌  called‌‌  ‌t-SNE‌‌  to‌‌  project‌‌  it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌sufficient.‌  ‌Brands‌  ‌also‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌differentiate‌  ‌from‌‌ 
our‌  ‌data‌  ‌onto‌  ‌a ‌ ‌two-dimensional‌  ‌plane.‌  ‌Unlike‌  ‌the‌  ‌prior‌‌  competitors‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌crowded‌‌  field.‌‌  Business‌‌  is‌‌  game‌‌  theoretic.‌‌ 
exhibit,‌‌  the‌‌  axes‌‌  no‌‌  longer‌‌  have‌‌  any‌‌  meaning.‌‌  We‌‌  care‌‌  only‌‌  Strong‌b‌ rands‌m ‌ ust‌b‌ e‌b‌ oth‌w
‌ ell-defined‌a‌ nd‌u‌ nique.‌  ‌
about‌w ‌ here‌e‌ ach‌b‌ rand‌l‌ ies‌i‌ n‌r‌ elation‌t‌ o‌o‌ thers.‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ In‌‌  order‌‌ to‌‌ identify‌‌ strong‌‌ brands,‌‌ we‌‌ create‌‌ metrics‌‌ for‌‌ each‌‌ 
Exhibit‌1
‌ 7‌  ‌ of‌‌  these‌‌ subcomponents.‌‌ We‌‌ identify‌‌ well-defined‌‌ brands‌‌ as‌‌ 
5D‌B
‌ rand‌M‌ ap‌  ‌ those‌  ‌that‌  ‌score‌  ‌highly‌  ‌on‌  ‌one‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌five‌  ‌brand‌‌ 
personality‌‌  factors.‌‌  It‌‌  is‌‌  more‌‌  important‌‌  that‌‌  a ‌‌brand‌‌ scores‌‌ 
highly‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌factor‌‌  than‌‌  which‌‌  factor‌‌  it‌‌  scores‌‌  highly‌‌  on.‌‌  We‌‌ 
calculate‌  ‌uniqueness‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌brand’s‌  ‌distance‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌‌ 
industry‌c‌ ompetitors.‌  ‌
 ‌
The‌  ‌next‌  ‌exhibit‌  ‌shows‌  ‌some‌  ‌outstanding‌  ‌brands‌  ‌in‌  ‌eight‌‌ 
important‌  ‌product‌  ‌categories.‌  ‌These‌  ‌brands‌  ‌all‌  ‌have‌  ‌great‌‌ 
recognition‌  ‌and‌  ‌strong‌  ‌positioning,‌  ‌despite‌  r‌ epresenting‌  ‌a ‌‌
diverse‌r‌ ange‌o‌ f‌i‌ ndustries‌a‌ nd‌b‌ rand‌p‌ ersonalities.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 8‌  ‌
Strong‌B‌ rands‌(‌ By‌I‌ ndustry)‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
We‌  ‌color‌  ‌code‌  ‌three‌  ‌clusters.‌  ‌As‌  ‌we‌  ‌saw‌  ‌earlier,‌  ‌apparel‌‌ 
brands‌‌  use‌‌  ‌ruggedness‌  ‌and‌‌  ‌sophistication‌  ‌as‌‌  brand‌‌ moats.‌‌ 
We‌  ‌also‌  ‌find‌  ‌a ‌ ‌less‌  ‌distinct‌  ‌but‌  ‌still‌  ‌noticeable‌  ‌cluster‌  ‌of‌‌ 
sincere‌  ‌brands.‌  ‌While‌  ‌excitement‌  ‌and‌‌  ‌competence‌  ‌are‌‌  not‌‌ 
irrelevant‌‌  in‌‌  apparel,‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ salient‌‌ enough‌‌ to‌‌ get‌‌ their‌‌ 
own‌  ‌clusters.‌‌  The‌‌  most‌‌  differentiated‌‌  brand‌‌  in‌‌  this‌‌  analysis‌‌ 
is‌  ‌Lululemon,‌  ‌which‌  ‌scores‌  ‌well‌  ‌on‌  ‌all‌  ‌five‌  ‌factors‌‌  and‌‌  has‌‌ 
carved‌o‌ ut‌i‌ ts‌o‌ wn‌t‌ erritory‌i‌ n‌‌the‌b‌ rand‌m ‌ ap.‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
Strong‌‌Brands‌  ‌  ‌
Finally,‌  ‌let’s‌  ‌test‌  ‌if‌  ‌strong‌  ‌brands‌  ‌have‌  ‌produced‌  ‌superior‌‌ 
As‌‌  with‌‌  human‌‌  personality,‌‌  there‌‌  is‌‌  no‌‌ one‌‌ dominant‌‌ brand‌‌  stock‌  ‌market‌  ‌performance.‌  ‌In‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌run‌  ‌a ‌ ‌backtest,‌  ‌we‌‌ 
personality‌  ‌type.‌  ‌Extraverts‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌inherently‌  ‌better‌  ‌than‌‌  need‌  ‌to‌  ‌first‌  ‌map‌  ‌brands‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌companies‌  ‌(e.g.,‌  ‌Tide,‌‌ 
introverts,‌  ‌nor‌‌  are‌‌  ‌rugged‌  ‌brands‌‌  superior‌‌  to‌‌  ‌sophisticated‌ ‌ Pampers‌‌  and‌‌  Gillette‌‌ are‌‌ all‌‌ owned‌‌ by‌‌ P&G).‌‌ We‌‌ also‌‌ need‌‌ to‌‌ 
ones.‌‌  The‌‌  ideal‌‌  brand‌‌  depends‌‌  both‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌ target‌‌ customer‌‌  create‌‌  rolling‌‌  point-in-time‌‌  snapshots‌‌  of‌‌  Twitter‌‌  data.‌‌ While‌‌ 
and‌c‌ ompetitive‌l‌ andscape.‌‌   ‌ this‌  ‌is‌  ‌mostly‌  ‌doable,‌  ‌we‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌recover‌  ‌deleted‌  ‌(or‌‌ 
 ‌ protected)‌  ‌Tweets,‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌or‌  ‌follows.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌unclear‌  ‌what‌‌ 
Firms‌‌  imbue‌‌  their‌‌  products‌‌  with‌‌ a ‌‌combination‌‌ of‌‌ attributes‌‌  bias‌t‌ his‌i‌ ntroduces,‌b‌ ut‌p‌ lease‌b‌ e‌f‌ orewarned.‌  ‌
tailored‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌target‌  ‌customers.‌  ‌The‌  ‌best‌  ‌mix‌  ‌can‌  ‌vary‌‌   ‌
widely.‌  ‌Harley-Davidson‌  ‌and‌  ‌Peloton‌  ‌have‌  ‌very‌  ‌different‌‌  Our‌  ‌strong‌  ‌brand‌  ‌factor‌  ‌buys‌  ‌the‌  ‌stocks‌‌  with‌‌  the‌‌  strongest‌‌ 
brand‌  ‌personalities,‌  ‌but‌  ‌both‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌immense‌  ‌loyalty‌  ‌from‌‌  brands‌  ‌and‌  ‌shorts‌  ‌those‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌weakest.‌  ‌We‌  ‌neutralize‌‌ 
their‌‌respective‌f‌ ans.‌  ‌ industry‌‌  exposure‌‌  (i.e.,‌‌  zero‌‌  net‌‌  exposure‌‌  to‌‌  each‌‌  industry),‌‌ 
 ‌ to‌e‌ nsure‌b‌ rands‌a‌ re‌c‌ ompared‌o‌ nly‌t‌ o‌t‌ heir‌‌competitors.‌  ‌
 ‌
7‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌1
‌ 9‌  ‌ Brand‌‌Social‌‌Networks‌  ‌
Strong‌B‌ rand‌O‌ utperformance‌  ‌
“Our‌  ‌experience‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌world‌  ‌depends‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌‌ 
structure‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌networks‌‌  in‌‌  which‌‌  we're‌‌  residing‌‌  and‌‌  on‌‌ 
all‌  ‌the‌  ‌kinds‌  ‌of‌  ‌things‌  ‌that‌  ‌ripple‌  ‌and‌  ‌flow‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌‌ 
network.”‌  ‌
🎓 ‌‌Nicholas‌C‌ hristakis,‌Y‌ ale‌P‌ rofessor‌  ‌
 

 ‌
Social‌  ‌scientists‌  ‌have‌  ‌found‌  ‌that‌  ‌phenomena‌‌  as‌‌  diverse‌‌  as‌‌ 
obesity,‌‌  smoking,‌‌  and‌‌  voting‌‌  patterns‌‌ spread‌‌ through‌‌ social‌‌ 
networks‌  ‌like‌  ‌viruses.‌  ‌Social‌  ‌ties‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌channels‌  ‌to‌‌ 
propagate‌t‌ hese‌p‌ henomena.‌  ‌
 ‌
Researchers‌‌  have‌‌  uncovered‌‌  similar‌‌  dynamics‌‌  in‌‌ the‌‌ spread‌‌ 
of‌  ‌shocks‌  ‌through‌  ‌networks‌  ‌of‌  ‌economically-linked‌  ‌firms.‌‌ 
Cohen‌  ‌and‌  ‌Frazzini‌  ‌(2006)‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌strong‌  ‌stock‌  ‌returns‌‌ 
 ‌ tend‌  ‌to‌  ‌predict‌  ‌future‌  ‌outperformance‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌focal‌  ‌firm’s‌‌ 
Source:‌  ‌Twitter,‌‌  S&P,‌‌  Sparkline.‌‌  Line‌‌  shows‌‌  the‌‌  performance‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  strong‌‌  customers.‌  ‌Hoberg‌  ‌and‌  ‌Phillips‌  ‌(2014)‌  ‌find‌  ‌a ‌ ‌similar‌  ‌effect‌‌ 
brand‌  ‌factor‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌universe‌  ‌consisting‌  ‌of‌  ‌U.S.‌  ‌consumer‌  ‌stocks‌‌  trading‌‌  on‌‌  for‌‌  firms‌‌  based‌‌  on‌‌  text-based‌‌  industry‌‌  linkages.‌‌  ‌Bekkerman‌‌ 
NYSE‌  ‌and‌  ‌Nasdaq.‌  ‌The‌  ‌strategy‌  ‌is‌  ‌industry-neutral‌  ‌(zero‌  ‌net‌‌  exposure‌‌  to‌‌  et‌  ‌al‌  ‌(2021)‌  ‌find‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌for‌  ‌stocks‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌textual‌‌ 
each‌‌  industry).‌‌  We‌‌  exclude‌‌  transaction‌‌  and‌‌  financing‌‌  costs.‌‌ From‌‌ 1/1/2010‌‌  similarity‌o‌ f‌t‌ heir‌p‌ atent‌p‌ ortfolios.‌  ‌
to‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌S‌ ee‌i‌ mportant‌b‌ acktest‌d‌ isclosure‌b‌ elow.‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ The‌  ‌motivating‌  ‌idea‌  ‌behind‌‌  network‌‌  momentum‌‌  strategies‌‌ 
Over‌  ‌the‌  ‌past‌  ‌decade,‌  ‌our‌  ‌strong‌  ‌brand‌  ‌strategy‌  ‌has‌‌  is‌  ‌that‌  ‌shocks‌  ‌propagate‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lag‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌ ‌network.‌‌ 
produced‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌outperformance.‌  ‌Strong‌  ‌brands‌  ‌are‌  ‌a ‌‌ Investors‌‌  able‌‌  to‌‌  accurately‌‌ model‌‌ the‌‌ structure‌‌ of‌‌ networks‌‌ 
deep‌  ‌moat‌  ‌that‌  ‌affords‌  ‌firms‌  ‌greater‌  ‌pricing‌  ‌power,‌  ‌sales‌‌  can‌  ‌react‌  ‌more‌  ‌quickly‌  ‌to‌  ‌these‌  ‌shocks,‌  ‌generating‌  ‌excess‌‌ 
volume,‌  ‌and‌  ‌customer‌  ‌loyalty.‌  ‌Furthermore,‌  ‌the‌  r‌ obust‌‌  returns.‌  ‌
historical‌‌  performance‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  factor‌‌  implies‌‌  that‌‌  the‌‌ market‌‌     ‌
does‌  ‌not‌  ‌fully‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌the‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌powerful‌  ‌but‌‌ 
intangible‌a‌ sset.‌  ‌
 ‌
   ‌

8‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌2
‌ 0‌  ‌  ‌
Brand‌S‌ ocial‌N‌ etwork‌  ‌  ‌

Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌  ‌


 ‌  ‌
We‌‌  can‌‌  use‌‌  Twitter‌‌  to‌‌  build‌‌  a ‌‌“brand‌‌  social‌‌  network.”‌‌ If‌‌ two‌‌  advantage‌  ‌of‌  ‌being‌  ‌much‌  ‌more‌  ‌granular‌  ‌than‌  ‌traditional‌‌ 
brands‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lot‌  ‌of‌  ‌common‌  ‌followers,‌  ‌we‌  ‌draw‌  ‌a ‌ ‌link‌‌  GICS‌i‌ ndustry‌c‌ lassifications.‌  ‌
between‌  ‌them.‌  ‌In‌‌  addition,‌‌  we‌‌  use‌‌  the‌‌  Louvain‌‌  community‌‌   ‌
detection‌‌  algorithm‌‌  to‌‌  color‌‌  code‌‌  each‌‌  cluster‌‌ and‌‌ set‌‌ node‌‌  But‌  ‌our‌  ‌brand‌  ‌social‌  ‌network‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌solely‌  ‌composed‌  ‌of‌‌ 
size‌p‌ roportional‌t‌ o‌n‌ etwork‌c‌ entrality.‌  ‌ isolated‌  ‌product-level‌  ‌cliques.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌like‌  ‌high‌  ‌school.‌  ‌In‌‌ 
 ‌ contrast,‌  ‌strong‌  ‌social‌  ‌ties‌  ‌do‌  ‌form‌  ‌across‌  ‌industries.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
Most‌‌  noticeably,‌‌  cliques‌‌  form‌‌  around‌‌ brands‌‌ selling‌‌ into‌‌ the‌‌  next‌  ‌exhibit‌  ‌shows‌  ‌pairs‌  ‌of‌  ‌brands‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌linked‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
same‌  ‌product‌  ‌market‌  ‌(e.g.,‌  ‌dating‌  ‌apps,‌  ‌luxury‌  ‌bags,‌‌  social‌g‌ raph‌d‌ espite‌o‌ perating‌i‌ n‌d‌ ifferent‌i‌ ndustries.‌‌   ‌
casinos,‌  ‌and‌  ‌dollar‌  ‌stores).‌  ‌These‌  ‌cliques‌  ‌make‌  ‌sense‌‌   ‌
inasmuch‌  ‌as‌  ‌sneakerheads‌  ‌follow‌  ‌many‌  ‌shoe‌  ‌brands‌  ‌and‌‌   ‌
powder‌  ‌hounds‌  ‌follow‌  ‌multiple‌  ‌ski‌  ‌resorts.‌  ‌While‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌  ‌
revelation‌i‌ n‌i‌ tself,‌t‌ hese‌p‌ roduct-level‌g‌ roupings‌h‌ ave‌t‌ he‌‌   ‌  ‌
 ‌
9‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌2
‌ 1‌  ‌ Exhibit‌2
‌ 2‌  ‌
Friends‌i‌n‌F‌ araway‌P
‌ laces‌ Brand‌N‌ etwork‌M
‌ omentum‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
Many‌  ‌brand‌  ‌pairs‌  ‌are‌  ‌intuitive‌  ‌complements.‌  ‌Hikers‌  ‌buy‌‌  Source:‌  ‌Twitter,‌  ‌S&P,‌  ‌Sparkline.‌‌  Line‌‌  shows‌‌  the‌‌  performance‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  brand‌‌ 
network‌‌  momentum‌‌  factor‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌universe‌‌ consisting‌‌ of‌‌ U.S.‌‌ consumer‌‌ stocks‌‌ 
both‌‌  PowerBars‌‌  and‌‌  CamelBaks;‌‌  homeowners‌‌  use‌‌  Terminix‌‌  trading‌  ‌on‌  ‌NYSE‌  ‌and‌  ‌Nasdaq.‌  ‌The‌  ‌strategy‌  ‌is‌  ‌industry-neutral‌  ‌(zero‌  ‌net‌‌ 
and‌‌  Scotts‌‌  lawn‌‌  care.‌‌  Other‌‌  pairs‌‌  are‌‌  less‌‌ obviously‌‌ related.‌‌  exposure‌  ‌to‌  ‌each‌  ‌industry).‌  ‌We‌  ‌exclude‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌and‌  ‌financing‌  ‌costs.‌‌ 
New‌  ‌couples‌  ‌buy‌  ‌an‌  ‌engagement‌  ‌ring‌  ‌from‌  ‌Brilliant‌  ‌Earth‌‌  From‌1‌ /1/2011‌t‌ o‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌S‌ ee‌i‌ mportant‌b‌ acktest‌d‌ isclosure‌b‌ elow.‌  ‌
before‌  ‌moving‌  ‌in‌  ‌together‌  ‌using‌  ‌Apartments.com;‌  ‌fans‌  ‌of‌‌   ‌
disruptive‌t‌ ech‌a‌ re‌l‌ ikely‌t‌ o‌f‌ ollow‌b‌ oth‌$‌ TSLA‌a‌ nd‌$‌ COIN.‌  ‌ Over‌  ‌the‌  ‌past‌  ‌decade,‌  ‌our‌  ‌brand‌  ‌network‌  ‌momentum‌‌ 
 ‌ strategy‌‌  delivered‌‌  consistently‌‌  positive‌‌  returns.‌‌  Moreover,‌‌ it‌‌ 
Now‌  ‌that‌  ‌we‌  ‌have‌  ‌built‌  ‌our‌  ‌brand‌  ‌social‌  ‌network,‌  ‌we‌  ‌can‌‌  had‌  ‌a ‌ ‌blowout‌  ‌year‌  ‌in‌  ‌2020,‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌fast-moving‌  ‌Covid‌‌ 
use‌‌  it‌‌  to‌‌  backtest‌‌  a ‌‌network‌‌  momentum‌‌  strategy.‌‌ We‌‌ assign‌‌  pandemic‌  ‌disrupted‌  ‌both‌  ‌supply‌  ‌chains‌  ‌and‌  f‌ inancial‌ 
each‌‌  brand‌‌  a ‌‌score‌‌  based‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  12-month‌‌  rolling‌‌  return‌‌  of‌‌  market‌  ‌price‌  ‌discovery.‌  ‌In‌  ‌times‌‌  of‌‌  crisis,‌‌  having‌‌  a ‌‌detailed‌‌ 
the‌‌  brands‌‌  to‌‌  which‌‌  it‌‌  is‌‌  connected.‌‌  When‌‌  a ‌‌brand’s‌‌  friends‌‌  graph‌o‌ f‌t‌ he‌l‌ inks‌b‌ etween‌f‌ irms‌c‌ an‌b‌ e‌i‌ nvaluable.‌  ‌
do‌  ‌well,‌  ‌we‌  ‌buy.‌  ‌When‌  ‌they‌  ‌do‌  ‌poorly,‌  ‌we‌  ‌sell.‌  ‌Since‌‌ 
research‌  ‌has‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌stock‌  ‌returns‌  ‌are‌  ‌higher‌  ‌after‌‌ 
 ‌
industry‌  ‌peers‌  ‌outperform‌  ‌(i.e.,‌  ‌industry‌  ‌momentum),‌  ‌we‌‌ 
run‌o‌ ur‌‌strategy‌i‌ ndustry-neutral.‌  ‌    ‌
 ‌

10‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
However,‌  ‌rather‌  ‌than‌  ‌measure‌  ‌the‌  ‌five‌  ‌facets‌  ‌of‌  ‌brand‌‌ 
The‌‌Future‌‌of‌‌Branding‌  ‌ personality,‌‌  we‌‌  focus‌‌  instead‌‌  on‌‌ two‌‌ facets‌‌ of‌‌ sustainability:‌‌ 
Sustainable‌B
‌ rands‌  ‌ environmentalism‌‌a‌ nd‌e‌ quality‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌
“If‌  ‌people‌  ‌believe‌  ‌they‌  ‌share‌  ‌values‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌company,‌‌  The‌  ‌exhibit‌  ‌below‌  ‌shows‌  ‌the‌  ‌seed‌  ‌accounts‌  ‌and‌  ‌keywords‌‌ 
they‌w ‌ ill‌s‌ tay‌l‌ oyal‌t‌ o‌t‌ he‌b‌ rand.”‌  ‌ we‌  ‌will‌  ‌use‌  ‌to‌  ‌find‌  ‌sustainable‌  ‌brands.‌  ‌In‌  ‌addition‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 

☕‌H‌ oward‌S‌ chultz,‌F‌ ormer‌‌Starbucks‌C‌ EO‌  ‌ World‌‌  Wildlife‌‌  Fund‌‌  from‌‌ earlier,‌‌ our‌‌ methodology‌‌ identifies‌‌ 


 ‌ several‌‌  other‌‌  seed‌‌  accounts,‌‌  many‌‌  of‌‌  which‌‌ are‌‌ non-profits.‌‌ 
One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌hottest‌  ‌current‌  ‌marketing‌  ‌trends‌  ‌is‌  ‌sustainable‌‌  The‌k‌ eywords‌a‌ re‌a‌ lso‌q‌ uite‌i‌ ntuitive‌(‌ e.g.,‌♻️ ‌ ).‌  ‌
 ‌
branding.‌  ‌Surveys‌‌  indicate‌‌  that‌‌  rising‌‌  generations‌‌  are‌‌  more‌‌  Exhibit‌2
‌ 4‌  ‌
likely‌‌  to‌‌  buy‌‌  from‌‌  brands‌‌  that‌‌  reflect‌‌  their‌‌  values,‌‌ and‌‌ firms‌‌  Sustainable‌A ‌ ccounts‌a
‌ nd‌K
‌ eywords‌  ‌
are‌r‌ ushing‌t‌ o‌c‌ apitalize‌o‌ n‌t‌ his‌g‌ rowing‌d‌ emand.‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌2
‌ 3‌  ‌
Sustainable‌B ‌ rand‌D
‌ emand‌  ‌

Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌


 ‌
 ‌
Source:‌5‌ WPR‌,‌S‌ parkline.‌  ‌
Next,‌‌  we‌‌  compute‌‌  the‌‌  similarity‌‌  of‌‌ each‌‌ brand‌‌ to‌‌ these‌‌ seed‌‌ 
 ‌ accounts‌  ‌and‌  ‌keywords.‌  ‌Below‌  ‌are‌‌  some‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  top‌‌  brands‌ 
In‌‌  turn,‌‌  investors‌‌  want‌‌  to‌‌  know‌‌  which‌‌  brands‌‌  are‌‌  perceived‌‌  that‌e‌ merge‌f‌ rom‌t‌ his‌a‌ nalysis.‌  ‌
 ‌
by‌  ‌consumers‌  ‌as‌‌  sustainable.‌‌  Unfortunately,‌‌  the‌‌  scourge‌‌  of‌‌  Exhibit‌2
‌ 5‌  ‌
corporate‌  ‌greenwashing‌  ‌has‌  ‌muddied‌  ‌the‌  ‌waters.‌  ‌Almost‌‌  Sustainable‌B ‌ rands‌  ‌
every‌  ‌large‌  ‌company‌  ‌now‌  ‌runs‌  ‌ads‌  ‌highlighting‌  ‌diversity‌‌ 
and‌  ‌inclusion,‌  ‌even‌  ‌those‌  ‌with‌  ‌racist‌  ‌or‌  ‌sexist‌  ‌leaders.‌‌ 
Meanwhile,‌  ‌an‌  ‌endless‌  ‌parade‌  ‌of‌  ‌consumer‌  ‌products‌  ‌are‌‌ 
labeled‌  ‌sustainable,‌  ‌even‌  ‌those‌  ‌manufactured‌  ‌with‌  ‌toxic‌‌ 
chemicals,‌f‌ ibers‌a‌ nd‌o‌ ther‌‌pollutants‌b‌ y‌e‌ xploited‌w ‌ orkers.‌  ‌
 ‌
Thus,‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌ever‌  ‌we‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌look‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌corporate‌‌ 
propaganda.‌  ‌Fortunately,‌  ‌social‌  ‌media‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌‌ 
directly‌‌  measure‌‌ the‌‌ perceptions‌‌ of‌‌ actual‌‌ consumers.‌‌ While‌‌ 
consumers‌  ‌are‌  ‌of‌  ‌course‌  ‌susceptible‌  ‌to‌  ‌manipulation,‌  ‌we‌‌ 
would‌  ‌hope‌  ‌the‌‌  public‌‌  is‌‌  savvy‌‌  enough‌‌  to‌‌  filter‌‌  out‌‌  at‌‌  least‌‌ 
some‌o‌ f‌t‌ his‌d‌ eception.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
We‌  ‌identify‌  ‌sustainable‌  ‌brands‌  ‌using‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌techniques‌‌  Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
as‌  ‌earlier‌  ‌(i.e.,‌  ‌brand‌  ‌embeddings‌  ‌and‌  ‌follower‌  ‌overlap).‌‌   ‌
11‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Our‌  ‌eco-friendly‌  ‌brands‌  ‌make‌  ‌plant-based‌  ‌meat,‌  ‌electric‌‌  On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌‌  brands‌‌  able‌‌  to‌‌  win‌‌  over‌‌  Millennial‌‌  (and‌‌ 
vehicle‌  ‌chargers,‌  ‌sustainable‌  ‌flooring,‌  ‌and‌  ‌lab-grown‌‌  Gen‌  ‌Z)‌  ‌buyers‌  ‌are‌  ‌likely‌  ‌to‌  ‌experience‌  ‌happy‌  ‌tailwinds‌  ‌as‌‌ 
diamonds.‌  ‌Our‌  ‌equality-focused‌  ‌brands‌  ‌own‌  ‌properties‌  ‌in‌‌  their‌‌  relative‌‌  incomes‌‌ continue‌‌ to‌‌ rise.‌‌ Investors‌‌ should‌‌ look‌‌ 
progressive‌  ‌media,‌  ‌mental‌  ‌health,‌  ‌online‌  ‌education,‌  ‌and‌‌  into‌h‌ ow‌t‌ o‌g‌ et‌e‌ xposure‌t‌ o‌t‌ his‌g‌ enerational‌t‌ orch-passing.‌  ‌
female-led‌d‌ ating.‌  ‌  ‌
 ‌ In‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  d‌ o‌  ‌this,‌  ‌we‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌exposure‌‌  of‌‌ 
While‌  ‌we‌  ‌believe‌  ‌our‌  ‌approach‌  ‌identifies‌  ‌many‌  ‌interesting‌‌  each‌‌  brand‌‌  to‌‌  each‌‌  demographic‌‌ cohort.‌‌ While‌‌ most‌‌ Twitter‌‌ 
sustainable‌‌  brands,‌‌  the‌‌  correlation‌‌  with‌‌  popular‌‌ ESG‌‌ scores‌‌  users‌  ‌do‌‌  not‌‌  explicitly‌‌  provide‌‌  their‌‌  age,‌‌  extensive‌‌  research‌‌ 
is‌  ‌not‌  ‌very‌  ‌high.‌  ‌This‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌because‌  ‌we‌  ‌focus‌  ‌solely‌  ‌on‌‌  (‌1,‌  ‌‌‌2,‌  ‌‌‌3,‌  ‌‌‌4)‌  ‌‌has‌‌  shown‌‌ that‌‌ this‌‌ and‌‌ many‌‌ other‌‌ demographic‌‌ 
consumer‌  ‌perception,‌  ‌while‌  ‌ESG‌  ‌scores‌  ‌address‌‌  a ‌‌plethora‌‌  attributes‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌estimated‌  ‌with‌‌  frightening‌‌  accuracy‌‌  from‌‌ 
of‌  ‌other‌  ‌stakeholders‌  ‌(e.g.,‌  ‌labor,‌  ‌investors).‌  ‌It‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌‌  online‌b‌ ehavior‌‌(e.g.,‌l‌ ikes,‌f‌ ollows,‌p‌ osts).‌😱 ‌  ‌ ‌
reflect‌  ‌the‌  ‌broadly‌  ‌unsettled‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌ESG‌  ‌ratings,‌  ‌which‌‌   ‌
can‌v‌ ary‌w ‌ idely‌e‌ ven‌a‌ mongst‌e‌ stablished‌v‌ endors.‌  ‌ The‌‌  techniques‌‌  used‌‌  by‌‌  social‌‌  media‌‌ and‌‌ digital‌‌ advertising‌‌ 
 ‌ firms‌  ‌to‌  ‌predict‌  ‌user‌  ‌behavior‌  ‌are‌  ‌extremely‌‌  sophisticated.‌‌ 
Millennial‌‌Brands‌  ‌ Since‌  ‌our‌  ‌ambition‌  ‌is‌‌  more‌‌  modest,‌‌  we‌‌  train‌‌  a ‌‌simple‌‌  (and‌‌ 
anonymized)‌  ‌model‌  ‌to‌  ‌estimate‌  ‌users’‌  ‌generational‌‌  cohort‌‌ 
“My‌  ‌biggest‌  ‌fear‌‌  for‌‌  this‌‌  company,‌‌  of‌‌  which‌‌  I ‌‌have‌‌  very‌‌  based‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌who‌  ‌they‌  ‌choose‌  ‌to‌  ‌follow.‌  ‌Below‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌‌ 
few,‌i‌ s‌t‌ hat‌w
‌ e‌l‌ ose‌t‌ he‌c‌ onnection‌w ‌ ith‌m ‌ illennials.”‌‌   ‌ accounts‌m ‌ ost‌r‌ evealing‌o‌ f‌t‌ heir‌‌followers’‌v‌ intage.‌ 
🍦 ‌P‌ aul‌P‌ olman,‌F‌ ormer‌‌Unilever‌C‌ EO‌  ‌
 

 ‌
 ‌ Exhibit‌2
‌ 7‌  ‌
While‌‌  sustainable‌‌ branding‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ important‌‌ marketing‌‌ trend,‌‌  Tell‌M
‌ e‌Y
‌ our‌A‌ ge‌W
‌ ithout‌T
‌ elling‌M
‌ e‌Y
‌ our‌A
‌ ge‌  ‌
it‌‌  is‌‌  being‌‌ driven‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ even‌‌ bigger‌‌ demographic‌‌ trend‌‌ --‌‌ the‌ 
rise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Millennial‌  ‌consumer.‌  ‌Millennial‌  ‌spending‌‌  power‌‌ 
recently‌  ‌surpassed‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌Boomers,‌  ‌and‌  ‌this‌  ‌gap‌‌  will‌‌  only‌‌ 
grow‌o‌ ver‌‌time.‌L‌ et‌t‌ he‌r‌ eign‌o‌ f‌t‌ he‌M ‌ illennial‌b‌ egin!‌  ‌
 ‌
Exhibit‌2
‌ 6‌  ‌
Coming‌o ‌ f‌A
‌ ge‌  ‌

 ‌
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌
 ‌
Gen‌  ‌Z ‌ ‌users‌  ‌are‌  ‌more‌  ‌likely‌  ‌to‌  ‌follow‌  ‌Dream‌  ‌(a‌  ‌Minecraft‌‌ 
Twitch/YouTube‌  ‌streamer),‌  ‌Millennials‌  ‌tend‌  ‌to‌‌  like‌‌  Becky‌‌  G ‌‌
(a‌‌  24-year-old‌‌ singer),‌‌ and‌‌ Boomers‌‌ still‌‌ watch‌‌ Ben‌‌ Affleck‌‌ (a‌‌ 
 ‌ 49-year-old‌‌  actor).‌‌ I ‌‌guess‌‌ telling‌‌ people‌‌ we‌‌ like‌‌ Blink-182‌‌ or,‌‌ 
Source:‌W
‌ orld‌D‌ ata‌L‌ ab,‌F‌ inancial‌T‌ imes,‌S‌ parkline.‌  ‌ worse,‌B‌ on‌J‌ ovi‌d‌ ates‌u‌ s!‌🤷 ‌  ‌ ‌
 ‌  ‌
This‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌inevitability‌  ‌is‌  ‌worrying‌  ‌for‌  ‌established‌‌  Now‌  ‌that‌  ‌we‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌model‌  ‌to‌  ‌identify‌‌  Millennial‌‌  accounts,‌‌ 
brands‌  ‌that‌  ‌cater‌  ‌to‌  ‌aging‌  ‌generations.‌  ‌As‌  ‌with‌  ‌any‌  ‌major‌‌  we‌  ‌can‌  ‌determine‌  ‌which‌  ‌brands‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌share‌  ‌of‌‌ 
market‌  ‌inflection,‌  ‌companies‌  ‌must‌‌  take‌‌  great‌‌  care‌‌  to‌‌  avoid‌‌  Millennial‌  ‌followers.‌  ‌We‌  ‌can‌  ‌do‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌for‌  ‌Gen‌  ‌Z ‌ ‌and‌‌ 
being‌d‌ isrupted‌b‌ y‌s‌ hifting‌c‌ onsumer‌‌preferences.‌   ‌ Boomer‌‌brands.‌O ‌ ur‌r‌ esults‌a‌ re‌s‌ hown‌b‌ elow.‌  ‌
 ‌
12‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
Exhibit‌2
‌ 8‌  ‌ them‌  ‌into‌  ‌advocates‌  ‌and‌  ‌apostles.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌words‌  ‌of‌  ‌Seth‌‌ 
Generation‌G ‌ ap‌  ‌ Godin,‌  ‌“People‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌buy‌  ‌goods‌  ‌and‌  ‌services.‌  ‌They‌  ‌buy‌‌ 
relations,‌s‌ tories‌a‌ nd‌m ‌ agic.”‌  ‌
 ‌
In‌‌ ‌Investing‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Intangible‌‌ Economy‌‌ (Oct‌‌ 2020)‌, ‌‌we‌‌ argued‌‌ 
that,‌  ‌like‌  ‌other‌  ‌intangible‌  ‌assets,‌  ‌brand‌  ‌tends‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌both‌‌ 
under-‌  ‌and‌  ‌mis-valued‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌intangibility.‌  ‌Our‌  ‌strong‌‌ 
brand‌‌  backtest‌‌ supports‌‌ this‌‌ view.‌‌ Companies‌‌ invest‌‌ billions‌‌ 
of‌  ‌dollars‌‌  to‌‌  build‌‌  up‌‌  their‌‌  brand‌‌  equity,‌‌  but‌‌  this‌‌  intangible‌‌ 
capital‌d‌ oes‌n‌ ot‌a‌ ppear‌‌on‌b‌ alance‌s‌ heets.‌  ‌
 ‌
The‌‌  accounting‌‌  profession’s‌‌  decision‌‌  to‌‌ not‌‌ capitalize‌‌ brand‌‌ 
investment‌‌  is‌‌  not‌‌  completely‌‌  without‌‌  merit.‌‌  Efforts‌‌  to‌‌  build‌‌ 
brand‌  ‌equity‌  ‌can‌  ‌produce‌  ‌a ‌ ‌very‌  ‌wide‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌potential‌‌ 
outcomes.‌  ‌Marketing‌  ‌campaigns‌  ‌can‌  ‌go‌  ‌viral,‌  ‌flop‌  ‌or‌  ‌even‌‌ 
backfire.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌historical‌  ‌outlays‌  ‌on‌  ‌marketing‌  ‌have‌‌  only‌‌  a ‌‌
 ‌ weak‌‌  link‌‌ to‌‌ brand‌‌ equity,‌‌ investors‌‌ need‌‌ to‌‌ focus‌‌ instead‌‌ on‌‌ 
Source:‌T‌ witter,‌S‌ parkline.‌A‌ s‌o‌ f‌1‌ 0/15/2021.‌  ‌ measuring‌t‌ he‌a‌ ctual‌v‌ alue‌o‌ f‌t‌ he‌b‌ rand.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
The‌‌  generational‌‌  divide‌‌  is‌‌  clearly‌‌  visible.‌‌  Boomers‌‌  are‌‌ most‌‌  Fortunately,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌influencer‌  ‌era,‌  ‌the‌  ‌nexus‌  ‌of‌  ‌consumer‌‌ 
comfortable‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌real‌  ‌world,‌  ‌being‌  ‌loyal‌  ‌consumers‌  ‌of‌‌  power‌‌  has‌‌  migrated‌‌ online.‌‌ It‌‌ has‌‌ moved‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ very‌‌ domain‌‌ 
boats,‌  ‌tools,‌  ‌appliances‌  ‌and‌  ‌ETFs‌‌  (📈 ).‌‌  On‌‌  the‌‌  other‌‌  hand,‌‌  that‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌  ‌fertile‌  ‌ground‌  ‌for‌  ‌NLP‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌modern‌‌ 
Gen‌  ‌Z ‌ ‌are‌  ‌true‌  ‌digital‌  ‌natives,‌  ‌embracing‌  ‌virtual‌  ‌products‌‌  data‌  ‌analysis‌  ‌techniques.‌  ‌With‌  ‌the‌  ‌exponential‌  ‌growth‌  ‌in‌‌ 
like‌R‌ oblox,‌S‌ ony‌a‌ nd‌N‌ etflix.‌  ‌ user-generated‌  ‌data,‌  ‌investors‌  ‌are‌  ‌better‌  ‌positioned‌  ‌than‌‌ 
 ‌ ever‌‌  to‌‌  quantify‌‌  this‌‌  important‌‌  intangible‌‌  asset.‌‌  Let’s‌‌  get‌‌  to‌‌ 
Fashion‌  ‌trends‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌fickle,‌  ‌so‌‌  we‌‌  are‌‌  not‌‌  recommending‌‌  work!‌  ‌
investors‌  ‌rush‌  ‌out‌  ‌to‌  ‌buy‌  ‌the‌  ‌hottest‌  ‌Gen‌  ‌Z ‌ ‌and‌‌  Millennial‌‌   ‌
brands.‌  ‌Case‌  ‌in‌  ‌point‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌100-year-old‌‌  Champion‌‌  brand,‌‌     ‌
which‌‌  is‌‌  seeing‌‌  a ‌‌surprising‌‌ resurgence‌‌ in‌‌ popularity‌‌ among‌‌ 
young‌  ‌consumers‌  ‌after‌  ‌being‌  ‌left‌  ‌for‌  ‌dead.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌especially‌‌ 
hard‌t‌ o‌p‌ ick‌i‌ ndividual‌w ‌ inners‌i‌ n‌f‌ ashion.‌  ‌
 ‌
On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌the‌  ‌broader‌  ‌underlying‌‌  themes‌‌  driving‌‌ 
the‌‌ popularity‌‌ of‌‌ these‌‌ Millennial‌‌ and‌‌ Gen‌‌ Z ‌‌brands‌‌ are‌‌ likely‌‌ 
to‌‌ persist.‌‌ Younger‌‌ people‌‌ do‌‌ tend‌‌ to‌‌ have‌‌ a ‌‌greater‌‌ focus‌‌ on‌‌ 
health‌  ‌and‌  ‌wellness,‌  ‌convenience‌  ‌and‌  ‌digital‌  ‌experience.‌‌ 
These‌‌  are‌‌  less‌‌ likely‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ fads‌‌ than‌‌ secular‌‌ trends.‌‌ Investors‌‌ 
may‌‌ do‌‌ well‌‌ to‌‌ consider‌‌ a ‌‌diversified‌‌ portfolio‌‌ of‌‌ brands‌‌ with‌‌ 
exposure‌t‌ o‌t‌ hese‌b‌ ig‌t‌ rends.‌  ‌
 ‌
Conclusion‌  ‌
“Products‌  ‌are‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌factory,‌  ‌but‌  ‌brands‌  ‌are‌‌ 
created‌i‌ n‌t‌ he‌m
‌ ind.”‌  ‌
📋 ‌‌Walter‌‌Landor‌  ‌
 

 ‌
Branding‌‌  can‌‌  be‌‌  a ‌‌powerful‌‌  intangible‌‌  asset.‌‌  Strong‌‌  brands‌‌ 
evoke‌  ‌powerful‌  ‌positive‌  ‌emotions‌  ‌in‌  ‌customers,‌  ‌turning‌‌ 

13‌  ‌
 ‌
Brand‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Influencer‌‌Era‌‌|‌‌Oct‌‌2021‌  ‌

 ‌
 ‌ Backtest‌D
‌ isclosure‌  ‌
The‌‌  performance‌‌  shown‌‌ reflects‌‌ the‌‌ simulated‌‌ model‌‌ performance‌‌ 
 ‌ an‌  ‌investor‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌had‌  ‌it‌  ‌invested‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌manner‌‌ 
shown‌  ‌but‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌represent‌  ‌performance‌  ‌that‌  ‌any‌  ‌investor‌‌ 
Kai‌‌Wu‌  ‌ actually‌  ‌attained.‌  ‌This‌  ‌performance‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌representative‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
Founder‌&
‌ ‌C
‌ IO,‌‌Sparkline‌C
‌ apital‌L
‌ P‌  ‌ actual‌  ‌investment‌  ‌strategy‌  ‌or‌  ‌product‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌provided‌  ‌solely‌  ‌for‌‌ 
 ‌ informational‌p‌ urposes.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
Kai‌  ‌Wu‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌founder‌  ‌and‌  ‌Chief‌  ‌Investment‌  ‌Officer‌  ‌of‌‌  Hypothetical‌  ‌performance‌  ‌has‌  ‌many‌  ‌significant‌  ‌limitations‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Sparkline‌‌  Capital,‌‌ an‌‌ investment‌‌ management‌‌ firm‌‌ applying‌‌  may‌  ‌not‌  ‌reflect‌  ‌the‌  ‌impact‌  ‌of‌  ‌material‌  ‌economic‌  ‌and‌  ‌market‌‌ 
state-of-the-art‌‌  machine‌‌  learning‌‌ and‌‌ computing‌‌ to‌‌ uncover‌‌  factors‌  ‌if‌  ‌funds‌  ‌were‌  ‌actually‌  ‌managed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌manner‌  ‌shown.‌‌ 
alpha‌i‌ n‌l‌ arge,‌u‌ nstructured‌d‌ ata‌s‌ ets.‌  ‌ Actual‌‌  performance‌‌  may‌‌  differ‌‌  substantially‌‌ from‌‌ simulated‌‌ model‌‌ 
 ‌ performance.‌  ‌Simulated‌  ‌performance‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌prepared‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌Sparkline,‌  ‌Kai‌  ‌co-founded‌  ‌and‌  ‌co-managed‌‌  benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌hindsight‌  ‌and‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌  ‌methodology‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌‌
Kaleidoscope‌  ‌Capital,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌quantitative‌  ‌hedge‌‌  fund‌‌  in‌‌  Boston.‌‌  material‌i‌ mpact‌o‌ n‌t‌ he‌s‌ imulated‌r‌ eturns‌‌presented.‌‌   ‌
With‌  ‌one‌  ‌other‌  ‌partner,‌  ‌he‌  ‌grew‌  ‌Kaleidoscope‌  ‌to‌  ‌$350‌‌   ‌
million‌  ‌in‌  ‌assets‌  ‌from‌  ‌institutional‌  ‌investors.‌  ‌Kai‌  ‌jointly‌‌  The‌  ‌simulated‌  ‌model‌  ‌performance‌  ‌is‌  ‌adjusted‌  ‌to‌  ‌reflect‌  ‌the‌‌ 
managed‌‌  all‌‌  aspects‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  company,‌‌  including‌‌  technology,‌‌  reinvestment‌  ‌of‌  ‌dividends‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌income.‌  ‌Simulations‌  ‌that‌‌ 
investments,‌  ‌operations,‌  ‌trading,‌  ‌investor‌  ‌relations,‌  ‌and‌  include‌  ‌estimated‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌costs‌  ‌assume‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
recruiting.‌  ‌ historical‌‌ bid-ask‌‌ spread‌‌ and‌‌ $0.01‌‌ in‌‌ commissions.‌‌ Simulated‌‌ fees,‌‌ 
expenses,‌a‌ nd‌t‌ ransaction‌c‌ osts‌d‌ o‌n‌ ot‌r‌ epresent‌a‌ ctual‌c‌ osts‌p‌ aid.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
Previously,‌  ‌Kai‌  ‌worked‌‌  at‌‌  GMO,‌‌  where‌‌  he‌‌  was‌‌  a ‌‌member‌‌  of‌‌  Index‌‌  returns‌‌  are‌‌  shown‌‌  for‌‌  informational‌‌ purposes‌‌ only‌‌ and/or‌‌ as‌‌ 
Jeremy‌  ‌Grantham’s‌  ‌$40‌  ‌billion‌  ‌asset‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌team.‌  ‌He‌‌  a‌  ‌basis‌‌  of‌‌  comparison.‌‌  Indexes‌‌  are‌‌  unmanaged‌‌  and‌‌  do‌‌  not‌‌  reflect‌‌ 
also‌  ‌worked‌  ‌closely‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌firm's‌  ‌equity‌  ‌and‌  ‌macro‌‌  management‌  ‌or‌  ‌trading‌  ‌fees.‌  ‌One‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌invest‌  ‌directly‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌ 
investment‌  ‌teams‌  ‌in‌  ‌Boston,‌  ‌San‌  ‌Francisco,‌  ‌London,‌  ‌and‌‌  index.‌  ‌The‌  ‌S&P‌  ‌500‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌popular‌  ‌gauge‌  ‌of‌  ‌large-cap‌‌  U.S.‌‌  equities‌‌ 
Sydney.‌  ‌ that‌  ‌includes‌  ‌500‌  l‌ eading‌  ‌companies.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Russell‌  ‌1000‌  ‌Index‌‌ 
 ‌ consists‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  approximately‌‌  top‌‌  1000‌‌  U.S.‌‌  stocks‌‌  by‌‌  market‌‌  cap.‌‌ 
Kai‌‌  graduated‌‌  from‌‌  Harvard‌‌  College‌‌  Magna‌‌  Cum‌‌  Laude‌‌ and‌‌  The‌‌  Russell‌‌  1000‌‌  Value‌‌  (Growth)‌‌  Index‌‌  includes‌‌ those‌‌ Russell‌‌ 1000‌‌ 
Phi‌B‌ eta‌K‌ appa.‌  ‌ companies‌  ‌with‌  ‌lower‌  ‌(higher)‌  ‌price-to-book‌  ‌ratios‌‌  and‌‌  expected‌‌ 
and‌h‌ istorical‌g‌ rowth‌‌rates.‌  ‌
 ‌  ‌
 ‌ No‌‌  representation‌‌  or‌‌  warranty‌‌  is‌‌  made‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ reasonableness‌‌ of‌‌ 
Disclaimer‌  ‌ the‌‌  methodology‌‌  used‌‌  or‌‌  that‌‌  all‌‌ methodologies‌‌ used‌‌ in‌‌ achieving‌‌ 
This‌  ‌paper‌‌  is‌‌  solely‌‌  for‌‌  informational‌‌  purposes‌‌  and‌‌  is‌‌  not‌‌  an‌‌  offer‌‌  the‌  ‌returns‌‌  have‌‌  been‌‌  stated‌‌  or‌‌  fully‌‌  considered.‌‌  There‌‌  can‌‌  be‌‌  no‌‌ 
or‌‌  solicitation‌‌  for‌‌ the‌‌ purchase‌‌ or‌‌ sale‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ security,‌‌ nor‌‌ is‌‌ it‌‌ to‌‌ be‌  assurance‌‌  that‌‌  such‌‌  hypothetical‌‌  performance‌‌  is‌‌  achievable‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
construed‌  ‌as‌  ‌legal‌  ‌or‌  ‌tax‌  ‌advice.‌  ‌References‌  ‌to‌  ‌securities‌  ‌and‌‌  future.‌‌Past‌p‌ erformance‌i‌ s‌n‌ o‌g‌ uarantee‌o‌ f‌f‌ uture‌r‌ esults.‌  ‌
strategies‌  ‌are‌  ‌for‌  ‌illustrative‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌only‌‌  and‌‌  do‌‌  not‌‌  constitute‌‌   ‌
buy‌‌ or‌‌ sell‌‌ recommendations.‌‌ The‌‌ information‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ report‌‌ should‌‌   ‌
not‌b‌ e‌u‌ sed‌a‌ s‌‌the‌b‌ asis‌f‌ or‌a‌ ny‌i‌ nvestment‌d‌ ecisions.‌‌   ‌
 ‌
We‌  ‌make‌  ‌no‌  ‌representation‌  ‌or‌  ‌warranty‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌accuracy‌  ‌or‌‌ 
completeness‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ information‌‌ contained‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ report,‌‌ including‌‌ 
third-party‌  ‌data‌  ‌sources.‌  ‌This‌‌  paper‌‌  may‌‌  contain‌‌  forward-looking‌‌ 
statements‌  ‌or‌  ‌projections‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌our‌  ‌current‌  ‌beliefs‌  ‌and‌‌ 
information‌  ‌believed‌‌  to‌‌  be‌‌  reasonable‌‌  at‌‌  the‌‌  time.‌‌  However,‌‌  such‌‌ 
statements‌‌  necessarily‌‌  involve‌‌  risk‌‌ and‌‌ uncertainty‌‌ and‌‌ should‌‌ not‌‌ 
be‌‌  used‌‌  as‌‌  the‌‌ basis‌‌ for‌‌ investment‌‌ decisions.‌‌ The‌‌ views‌‌ expressed‌‌ 
are‌a‌ s‌‌of‌t‌ he‌p‌ ublication‌d‌ ate‌a‌ nd‌s‌ ubject‌t‌ o‌c‌ hange‌a‌ t‌a‌ ny‌t‌ ime.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

14‌  ‌

You might also like