4. What are the major differences between functional managers and project managers?

Functional managers and project managers are alike in many aspects. However, there are still some
major differences between them. While project managers overseeing many functional areas,
functional managers primarily focus on mostly in charge of one functional dept (for example:
marketing, finance). Functional managers are known as the direct, technical supervisors and as the
specialists in the area they manage. In contrast, project managers are generalists with a wide
background of experience and knowledge as well as facilitators. Moreover, functional managers are
analytically oriented, responsible for 4Ws 1H of each job/task while project managers have more
skills at synthesis and use systems approach. Not only that, project managers rarely have in depth
knowledge of all areas, but functional managers know some details of each operation. They also
know the technology to advise and solve problems. However, project managers are inclined to
facilitate cooperation.
24. Do you agree that the trend now is to become less of a generic project manager and more of
a specialist? If so, then how do you gain a wide range of experience for that next job
opportunity?
Without a doubt, project management may be invigorating and satisfying, but it can also be
exceptional and demanding, and it is not the best career choice for everyone. That is why I agree
that there is a tendency toward managers being more specialized than generic project managers
since generalists may face certain difficulties such as job insecurity, worthiness as well as direction.
In order to gain a wide range of experience for that next job opportunity, it is it is critical to
remember that generalists are made up of a number of so-called "soft" qualities such as
determination, keen thinking, rapid learning, acute awareness, and people skills. Nowadays, soft
skills are becoming increasingly important as new business categories arise and altogether new,
nontraditional vocations emerge. Because it is simpler and widely recognized to hold a stronger
argument, screening methods frequently focus on hard abilities; nonetheless, techniques should be
examined and reinvented to adapt to the continually changing global stage. After all, it is more
necessary than ever to employ flexible, adaptable, and quick-thinking employees to drive a strategy
that necessitates all the above.