You are on page 1of 10

024A

IN THE

HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF KISAANISTAN

AT NEW DELHI

IN THE MATTERS OF

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION NO. 2455/2021

MS. SADHIKA CHABBRA.............................................................................APPELLANT

(REPRESENTED BY HERSELF)

V.

SPEAKER, GAJSTHAN LEGISLATIVE

ASSEMBLY.............................RESPONDENT

(REPRESENTED BY HIMSELF)

[]

AND

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION NO. 2456/2021

MS. SADHIKA CHABBRA..............................................................................APPELLANT

(REPRESENTED BY HERSELF)

V.

CHIEF MINISTER, STATE OF

GAJSTHAN.............................................RESPONDENT

(REPRESENTED BY MS. R. D. KUMARPANI)

[]
CLUBBED WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2457/2021

7 MILES PVT. LTD...........................................................................................APPELLANT

(REPRESENTED BY MS. LAKSHMEE MEHLOT)

V.

GHANTAGHAR PVT. LTD..........................................................................RESPONDENT

(REPRESENTED BY MR. SOORESH HANZ)

[]

THE ABOVE MATTERS HAVE BEEN CLUBBED

Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India Read with Rule 3, Order LV Of the Supreme

Court Rules, 2013

ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
STATEMENT OF FACTS

 On December 26, 2019, assembly elections took place in the province of Gajsthan

situated in the Republic of Kisaanistan [“ Kisaanistan”]. The results were declared

and the Peace Party thus formed the provincial government.

Disputes arose among certain ministers of the Peace Party during July 2020 regarding

allocation of state revenue. The matters of dispute were related to the fundamental

idea of the Peace Party, and thus the Party asked the members to support it in all its

policies.

On August 15, 2020, the dissenting ministers, along with 13 other representatives

publicly opposed the policies of provincial government, and the central leadership of

the Peace Party denounced said resolution.

On August 16, 2020, the Socialist Party’s representative presented an application for

the disqualification of the forementioned members from the Assembly on the grounds

of defection. Meanwhile, on October 15, 2020, the Bill was introduced in the

assembly; with the dissenting members voting against it, the Bill was thus defeated.

Following this, on November 5, 2020, the Socialist Party urged the State Governor to

direct the Chief Minister to face a trust vote in the assembly. The Governor thus

directed that it be done by November 15, 2020. The Chief Minister denied the

direction challenging its constitutionality. On November 18, the Speaker also

dismissed the application for disqualification of dissenting members.

 The appellant, 7 Miles Pvt. Ltd. [“7 Miles”] observing that the colleges in Veerupur,

Gajsthan host fests from September to December every year, decided to monetize on

this opportunity in 2020 in order to kickstart a massive expansion at their restaurants.

Thus, in order to procure large-scale kitchen equipment for their restaurants, the
appellant entered into an agreement with the respondent, Ghantaghar Pvt. Ltd.

[“Ghantaghar”], who has a reputation for delivering quality products within

aggressive deadlines. The agreement specified the deadline for delivery of goods as

31 July 2020. The agreement also had a force majeure clause.

On June 15, 2020, the Ministry of Health notified regulations for closing educational

institutions till November 30, 2020, and banning inter-state transportation of goods till

July 30, 2020, which came into force in the entire State of Gajsthan on the onslaught

of a flu that was contained within the state. However, neither intra-state transport nor

manufacturing was suspended. For this reason, the respondent denied delivering

goods within the contractual deadline citing increased costs and difficulty.
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION

I. WHETHER OR NOT WOULD THE ACTIONS OF THE DISSENTING MEMBERS BE REGARDED

AS ‘VOLUNTARILY GIVING UP MEMBERSHIP’ AND THUS AMOUNT TO DEFECTION?

II. WHETHER OR NOT DOES THE GOVERNOR HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DIRECT THE CHIEF

MINISTER TO CALL FOR A TRUST VOTE IN THE ASSEMBLY?

III. WHETHER OR NOT IS THE INABILITY OF THE RESPONDENT TO DELIVER GOODS

ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACTUAL DATE IN VIOLATION OF THE AGREEMENT DATED

MAY 1, 2020?
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

I. THE ACTIONS OF THE DISSENTING MEMBERS SHOULD BE REGARDED

‘VOLUNTARILY GIVING UP MEMBERSHIP’ AND THUS AMOUNT TO AS DEFECTION

The fact that the Peace Party had asked all its members to support it in all its policies, and

that subsequently their Bill was opposed on the floor of the assembly by the dissenting

members of the Party makes evident the defiance of Party direction, and thus amounts to

defection under Schedule X of the Constitution of India.

II. THE GOVERNOR DOES HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DIRECT THE CHIEF MINISTER TO

CALL FOR A TRUST VOTE IN THE ASSEMBLY

As per Article 163(2) of the Constitution of India, whenever there is doubt with regards to

whether or not the Governor is required to act in his discretion under the Constitution, the

decision of the Governor in his/her discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything done

by the Governor shall not be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to

have acted in his discretion. Additionally, the Supreme Court of India has affirmed the power

of the Governor to call for a trust vote/floor test whenever he/she a government in power has

lost the confidence of the House/Assembly.

III. THE INABILITY OF THE RESPONDENT TO DELIVER GOODS ACCORDING TO THE

CONTRACTUAL DATE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE AGREEMENT DATED MAY 1, 2020

The fact that intra-state transport of goods and manufacturing activities have not been

suspended by the Ministry of Health’s notification proves that the delivery of goods within

the deadline, however difficult, is not impossible. Courts, in various cases, have held that

increased costs and difficulty is no excuse for non-performance of contractual obligations by

invoking the doctrine of frustration and force majeure.


ARGUMENTS ADVANCED

You might also like