Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part 1
Part 1
Part 1: What do gorilla suits and blowfish fallacies have to do with climate change?
Name
Institutional affiliation
Due Date
2
What do gorilla suits and blowfish fallacies have to do with climate change?
Fallacies are error that occur in reasoning among individuals to deter or undermine the
logics in an argument. The fallacies distract people from an important information through the
use of irrelevant information. The fallacies are identified to their lack of evidence and are
irrelevant and illegimate. The blowfish and gorilla suits fallacies are examples of fallacies. It is
ridiculous how they are related to climate change. The fallacies are a disruption to something
more than that which it communicates. The gorilla suits is a game for the selective attention test
which is devised to see if selected attention can be tampered with. The video requires that one
focus on ball switching between those in white T-shirts while counting them. After the counting,
the participants are then asked to tell if at all they noticed a gorilla passing through. In most
cases, the outcome was that none of them saw the gorilla move past them (Cook January 2017).
The selective attention is proof that fallacies can obstruct people from noticing the key and
important things through obstruction by what is less important. The video teaches on selective
The other part of the fallacies of interest is the blowfish fallacy. It is a fish metaphor that
is applied to distract people from necessary scientific information. The method focus on
inconsequential aspects of scientific research. It blows out the picture to cause distraction from
the important scientific findings. Persuading people to focus on hard things can make them miss
the gorilla. The research on the cause of global warming in the globe has led to agreement by
researchers that humans are the leading causes of global warming. However the idea has been
rejected by the politicians newspapers and conservative tanks (Cook January 2017). The critics
focus on small details on the methodology that have little or no effect on the results. The critics
The blow-fish through a journalist David Rose has been used to distract the scientific
research on climate global warming. Rose claimed that the flows on NOAA records on the
temperature caused a doubt. However, the data attacked by Rose had been replicated by several
research groups independently. This indicates how much a misleading information can spread to
distract many.
The climate gorilla is an evidence of how much distracting techniques tampers with
important information from them people. The distraction are developed through a simple or a
part of information distortion to attract the attention of the people from what is important (Cook
January 2017). They fail to notice that science is broad and removal of a single evidence does not
distort the initial information due to the attachment of other supportive evidences to each
evidence.
that Covid-19 causes infertility. The critics based their reasons on lawsuits related to Bill Gates
and the vaccines in Africa. The case is classified under the red herring. It is an irrelevant
message meant to disrupt people from the facts this ought to be addressed in terms of the safety
of the vaccine to humans rather than including an irrelevant information linking it to a law suit
(Fuchs 2021). Inclusion of the Bill Gates lawsuits distracts readers from the important concern
References
Cook, J. (2017, January). Understanding and countering climate science denial. In Journal and
Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales (Vol. 150, No. 465/466, pp. 207-
219).
Fuchs, C. (2021). Bill Gates Conspiracy Theories as Ideology in the Context of the COVID-19