Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAW, RANCHI
HISTORY PROJECT
HISTORY SECTION: A
Shreya
Ms Sreemoyee Sarkar
History
10 December 2021
Slavery’s history is a vast and unfathomable tale of tragedy and evil that spans centuries
and nations. It is very difficult to determine the precise year that slavery began. Slavery has been
a socio-economic system under which certain persons known as slaves were deprived of the
personal freedom and compelled to perform labour or service. However, there is no popular
concept which is approved unanimously in Indian context. If someone goes through a bird’s eye
view in Medieval India (800 AD – 1700AD) literature, he is certainly bound to pass through
• The present research work examines the historical background and development of
slavery as an institution during the time of medieval India. My main aim is to examine various
• This research paper also sheds light on the slave trade. The growth of slave trade was a
significant development in early medieval period. Apart from sources of slavery, I will be
examining Slave Trade during medieval India Period. The Conclusion part sums up all the
SOURCES OF SLAVERY
Slavery works as an institution based on the relationship of dominance and submission, where by
one person owns another and can extract labour or services from that person. Slavery originated
during later Vedic period and kept on continuing throughout the realm in various phases up to
12th century. In the Rig-Veda, there are numerous references which talk of the struggle between
the dasas and the Aryan. From the early Buddhist works we know that slavery was prevalent
from c.600-300B.C in India (Singh 19). Wars, famines, poverty, abductions etc. had been some
Wars. In the War of the foreign expansion of Islam, many people who became prisoners of war
lost their personal freedom and liberty and was pushed into slavery. The Medieval India era
witnessed many regional wars as well as foreign invasions. After the Harsha death there was a
state of turmoil and the capital city Kanauj became the centre for tripartite struggle which
involved three major dynasties i.e. the Palas, the Gurjara- Pratiharas and the Rashtrakutas (Singh
26). Also, because of the invasion of Muslims like Mahmud army at the end of 10th century and
later Mohammed Ghori which opened up the Indian sub-continent for war and conflict. The
slaves in the period of Delhi Sultanate are the result of this war and conflict (Chen 225). During
these wars, people were captured and enslaved. From the plunder of Mathura and Kannauj,
wherein Mahmud Ghazni captured 53,000 peopke and enslaved them (Mehta 68). After the fall
of Kalinjar, Kutub-ud-din enslaved 50,000 Hindus (Smith 403). In 1357, Sultan Al ud-Din Khalji
dispatched Malik Kafur to carry out a massive expansion in the Daccan, with an estimated
number of "horses and slaves" becoming a prize, according to Barani, a Muslim historian of the
same age. According to Barani, Balban brought back a large number of slaves and livestock
4
during his attack on the Doab region was so large that it caused the price of slaves in the Delhi
Selling themselves to Become Slave. Because of the strict hierarchy caste- system, people
belonging to the lower strata of the society were oppressed and exploited to the core. Inability to
repay debt and money scarcity in times of calamities which used to force people towards
indebtedness, used to force people to sell themselves as slaves. During the reign of Balban and
Khilji, many civilians who were not taxed were forced to sell themselves as slaves, and
according to Ibn Battuta, the Sultan Firoz Shah ruled that the jobless could be sold as slaves on a
Tribute or Gifts. During the medieval India period, gifts were also used to enslave people. The
habit of presenting gifts began in India during the Vedic period, when slaves were included as
part of the gift. Later gifts included land and villages, which culminated in the rise of feudalism
during the Satvahana period. These gifts were extremely essential in the early mediaeval period's
socioeconomic system. During early mediaeval India, it was standard practise to give slaves as
gifts. We find a mention in the Rigveda where Trasdasyu offering fifty slave girls to his father
Purukutas as dasis (Singh 37). In Delhi Sultanate period, in addition to handing over a huge
quantity of tributes each year, many of the vassal rulers that surrender to the Delhi Sultan will
also dedicate captives from all over the kingdom to the Sultan, particularly the young and
Work of Slaves
The work assigned to slaves can be classified into three types. Firstly, the slaves doing household
chores. Second, slaves indulged in agricultural and other productive work and third, those
indulged in non-household works. The female slaves were employed for various other purposes
like singing, dancing and the most beautiful among them served as concubines of the rich Amir
and Maliks, and in the royal establishments (Sen 203). Slaves were employed in menial jobs
such as sweeping the entrance gate, sweeping the roads, cleaning the latrine, throwing away the
night soil, cleaning the gutters and reservoirs, smearing the floor with cow dung, and cleaning
the internal parts of the body, according to noted historian R.S. Sharma. In terms of the early
medieval period, it is impossible to assume that they were solely used in impure works based on
the evidence gathered from the period's sources. In fact, as indicated in Karapurmanjri,
but not least, in some other constructive undertakings (Singh 44). Slaves were typically
purchased for household service or for their special skills. In the documents of the
Lekhapaddhati, we find that the duties of the purchased slave girls included outside works, such
as cultivation, field works, thrashing, bringing grass, etc. along with other domestic works.
Skilled slaves were prized, and some climbed to positions of power, like as Qutbuddin Aibak's
servants. Many of them worked as artisans, while others served as the Sultan's personal guards.
The majority of slaves, on the other hand, were utilised for personal service.
The regular trade of slaves developed in Buddhist period was also prevalent during early
medieval period. Egyptian and Greek merchants established the slave trade with India through
6
sea which can be testified from the accounts of Eudoxos (Srivastava 124). The Delhi Sultanate of
India merely served to enhance the overland slave trade. Large-scale enslavement also shows
that a large need for slaves arose within India, with demand stemming from the Sultan's
establishment in Delhi and the new town-based Turkish ruling class, for whom settling in a
foreign place was a difficult and time-consuming job requiring enormous labour. Taking men as
captives was thus favoured over slaughtering them altogether (Bano 365). Muslim nobles and
military chiefs frequently choose able-bodied slaves from these slave markets to bolster their
armies and wage war to conquer the world. Muhammad Gours' acquisition from the Ghazni
slave market was owned by Qutb-ud-din Aibak, the founder of the Delhi Sultanate's so-called
"Slave Dynasty" (1206-1290). India bought slaves from Africa, the Malay Peninsula, and China in
Indian slaves were bought at low prices in Delhi and carried across the border to be sold
in the markets of Khurasan, Ghazni, and Bukhara, among other places. The mountain of
Hindukush is known as the killer of Indians, according to Ibn Batuta, because "the slave boys
and girls that are brought from the land of India die in large numbers there as a result of the
extreme cold and a great quantity of snow (Bano 316)." Political measures played a role in the
fall in slave shipments as well. Akbar outlawed not just the enslavement of captives, but also
the sale of slaves in 1562-63. Prior to this proclamation, the slave trade must have been
extremely significant, but it began to dwindle in the later years of Akbar's reign. We also see
some ethical progress and a dislike for slavery rising during the Mughal period. Even Badauni
(late 16th century) acknowledges his disapproval of an institution that had obtained Islamic
approval, and is pleased to note a reduction in the slave trade in India during his lifetime.
7
Aurangzeb also made it illegal to transport Indian slaves to Persia. Despite some inflated stories,
the slave trade in the 17th century could not have been as extensive as it had been in the early
medieval period (Bano 318). There was also a counter movement of slaves from abroad into
India. Slaves of different nationalities, both male and female, were brought.
CONCLUSION
Many medieval Indian slaves were born as a result of conflict. In comparison to ancient India,
the status of slaves became more pathetic. The development of social economy and the further
refinement of the social division of Labour have also strongly promoted the transformation of
this status. Indian slaves in the Delhi Sultanate era seemed to have improved in terms of social
status and living standards, but from a social class standpoint, they were still oppressed and
exploited classes. It can be fairly said that due to certain decisive factors discussed earlier slave
livelihood for a section of society while a profitable job for elite class. The trade formalities
were given legal shape by preparing the deeds of sales. Although a handful of slaves succeeded
in achieving their status and status changes, for the vast majority of slaves, they still lived at the
Works Cited
http://hdl.handle.net/10603/113757
Zehua Chen. “The status and identity Evolution of Indian Slaves during Delhi Sultanate.”
SOSHU 2020, Francis Academic Press, UK., 14 May, 2020. Web of Proceedings,
https://webofproceedings.org/proceedings_series/ESSP/SOSHU%202020/SOSHU20046.
J.L Mehta. Madhyakalin Bharat ka Varshat Itihas. Vol. 1, Jawahar Publisher & Distributors.
Smith, Vincent A. The Early History of India. India, Atlantic Publishers & Distributors (P)
Limited, 1999.
Prakash, Om. Cultural History of India. India, New Age International, 2005.
Asit Kumar Sen. “ON SLAVERY IN MEDIEVAL INDIA.” Proceedings of the Indian History
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44140837.
Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 39, Indian History Congress, 1978, pp.
124–36, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44139343.
9
History Congress, vol. 61, Indian History Congress, 2000, pp. 365–73,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44148113.
Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 58, Indian History Congress, 1997, pp.
315–21, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44143922.