Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The above meanings refer governance to the running of government affairs. However:
- In its wider and realistic application of the value free concept of governance, it also
applies in the non-governmental institutions since basically, it is the process of decision
making and the process by which decisions are implemented or not implemented.
Therefore:
-Good governance is responsive to the present and future needs of the organization,
exercises prudence in policy-setting and decision-making, and that the best interests
of all stakeholders are taken into account.
-With its value connotation, good governance is the right or just or moral judgments
made by those exercising authority in the public interest.
-Public interest, in this context, means an aggregation of the interests of the many,
but certainly not of all.
2.Accountable 6. Transparent
Participatory
- Participation by both men and women, either directly or through legitimate representatives,
is a key cornerstone of good governance. Participation needs to be informed and organized,
including freedom of expression and assiduous concern for the best interests of the
organization and society in general.
Accountable
- Accountability is a key tenet of good governance. Who is accountable for what should be
documented in policy statements? In general, an organization is accountable to those who
will be affected by its decisions or actions as well as the applicable rules of law.
Responsive
- Good governance requires that organizations and their processes are designed to serve the
best interests of stakeholders within a reasonable timeframe.
Consensus Oriented
- Good governance requires consultation to understand the different interests of stakeholders
in order to reach a broad consensus of what is in the best interest of the entire stakeholder
group and how this can be achieved in a sustainable and prudent manner.
Transparent
- Transparency means that information should be provided in easily understandable forms and
media; that it should be freely available and directly accessible to those who will be affected
by governance policies and practices, as well as the outcomes resulting therefrom; and that
any decisions taken and their enforcement are in compliance with established rules and
regulations.
- activities of government in the public domain, such as policing and public health;
- activities done for the benefit of the public, like public service broadcasting or rubbish
collection; and
- “social services‟, like medical care, housing, education and social care.
Reason of Policy
- The public services are not about provision by the state, or provision on behalf of the
state, but provision for the public, whether or not it is done by public authorities. They
may be linked to government activities, but they are not confined to government, and
government does not cover the full range of such activities. Some public services are
in the public sector, some are independent, and many straddles the boundaries - there
is a complex interplay of different approaches to regulation, finance and provision
(Judge, Knapp, 1985).
- Public services are intended, not to meet the objectives or preferences of consumers
or producers, but to further objectives that policy-makers consider desirable - whoever
those policy makers may be, because the term might include not just government, but
governing bodies, voluntary organizations, mutualist societies, philanthropists and
others. Bozeman suggests that “publicness” is “a characteristic of an organization
which reflects the extent the organization is influenced by political authority.”
(Bozeman, Bretschneider, 1994, p 197).
- “In principle, public services are the responsibility of public authorities.” (European
Commission, 2005, p 25)
Redistributive
- Not necessarily: is either non-commercial or, in some sense, beyond the commercial.
For McKevitt, this is about “non-marketability” (McKevitt, 1998, ch 1); for Flynn, it is
about finance, that services are not evidently for sale (Flynn, 2007, p 8). This is
suggestive, but neither identifies the issues clearly. One of the recurring clichés in
claims for public service is that they are concerned with “a public service, not a
business”.
- Public services are redistributive, in the sense that those who pay are not necessarily
those who receive. A firm which sells soup to the public is not providing a “public
service”, even if it is very good soup, but an agency which distributes soup to homeless
people is. A commercial theatre is not providing a public service, but “public service”
broadcasting can carry a transmission of the play they put on to a non-paying
audience.
- Intention to redistribute is not the defining principle: rather, the process is that public
services allocate resources. Redistribution is an inevitable concomitant of that process.
(Redistributive allocation as a function of government: Musgrave, 1959, pp 6 ff.
However, the allocation does not have to be done only by government: any charity,
any mutual insurer, is also redistributing resources.)
Act as Trust
- The policy-maker, not the consumer, is the purchaser of services
- The characteristic nature of public services is that such services are operated as a
trust. What these examples all have in common is a mechanism in which A pays B to
provide a service for C. Although A and B are often parts of the government, this
mechanism is not unique to government
Note:
ABSTRACT (GIST):
- The last decade has witnessed significant government focus on quality service
delivery and good public administration. Significantly driven by two broad factors:
public sector inefficiencies, and liberal economic ideology, these reforms have
emphasized public service that is high in quality, efficient, continually improving and
responsive to the needs of the people and provided in a manner that is transparent,
accountable, participatory and predictable, in terms of the application of the rule of
law.
- Against this background, this paper examines recent (2010-present (2016)) policy
reforms in the public sector in the Philippines, which aspire to improve the quality of
public services. These include governance reforms that aim to curb corruption, improve
the delivery of public services especially to the poor, and enhance the business and
economic environment of the country as a whole. Focus will be on reforms in
government procurement, bottom up budgeting, seal of good (local) governance, anti-
red tape, and citizen satisfaction index system.
4. Improvement of public sector asset and resource management and revenue performance
5. Establishing an improved policy and regulatory environment that will reduce the cost of
doing business in the country and improve competition (E.O. 43 s 2011).
Cabinet Cluster on Good Governance 2014 Good Governance Initiatives of the Aquino
c. References:
governancepro.com/news/
Spicker, P., 20019. The nature of public service, International Journal of Public Administration,
32 (11), pp. 970-991
Villamejor- Mendoza, M.F., Paper presented at the 2015 Korean Association of Public
Administration International Conference on “What is the Essence of „Good Public
Administration‟?” held at Sangmyung University Hannurikwan, Cheonan, Korea on 16-
18 July 2015.