Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Language, Culture
and Society
Module prepared by:
DONNA CLAIRE B. CAÑEZA
Part-time Instructor
I. PRE-COMPETENCY CHECKLIST
Direction: Answer the following questions.
The Language development is affected by the way people develop in different areas.
How can language development be affected by other areas of development? How can an
individual acquire language? Does individual’s environment affect language acquisitions?
Teaching an learning process will be more effective if we will be able to apply all
the teaching methods presented because there are different types of learners. All of the
teaching methods are applicable in Elementary, Secondary, and Tertiary because the
learners in each levels are different when it comes to learning. Teacher should be flexible
and adoptive in order to become an effective educator. He/She should be able to teach
the students with necessary knowledge and skills. Educators must familiarize each
teaching strategies to easily determine what kind of teaching method he/she should use
to be able to teach a specific type of learner and ensure that they are really learning. The
application of these teaching methods in accordance with the types of learners in a
specific class can help the students participate actively and learn enthusiastically. It
encourage participation and motivation. And choosing a teaching method to be applied in
a specific class, requires a teacher to experiment and explore with his/her class. It
depends on what type of learners you have in a classroom.
• Innateness Hypothesis
It is an expression coined by Hilary Putman, referring to a linguistic theory
of language acquisition which holds that at least some knowledge about language
exists in humans at birth. The expression “innateness hypothesis” was used by
Putman to target linguistic nativism specially the views of Noam Chomsky.
Facts about the complexity of human language systems, the universality of
language acquisition, the facility that children demonstrate in acquiring these
systems, and the comparative performance of adults in attempting the same task
are all commonly invoked in support. However, the validity of Chomsky's approach
is still debated. Empiricists advocate that language is entirely learned. Some have
criticized Chomsky's work, pinpointing problems with his theories while others
have proposed new theories to account for language acquisition (with specific
differences in terms of language acquisition per se compared to second language
acquisition).
Although many scholars, especially those linked with generative grammar,
proposed during the latter half of the 20th century that language is innate, no
evidence was found to support their claim. The idea is today rejected by the
mainstream psycholinguistic and child language acquisition researchers.
Linguistic nativism now represents a marginal view in those fields. Innate
basis in language is also rejected by crosslinguistic research because languages
are shown to have similar structures on a statistical rather than universal basis.
(Wikipedia n.d.)
For example, time and again, we hear or witness children uttering things
that they could not have heard from their caregivers or adults. In spite of adults not
adapting their language and speech to their children, the children end up learning
it. A newborn baby can be able able to produce sounds and recognize how
language sounds. And it can be enhanced through the interaction with his family
particularly with his parents. Eventually, with this constant interaction, the baby can
be able to produce words and later on, sentences in order to fully communicate.
• Poverty of Stimulus
Poverty of the stimulus (POS) is the controversial argument
from linguistics that children are not exposed to rich enough data within their
linguistic environments to acquire every feature of their language. This is
considered evidence contrary to the empiricist idea that language is learned solely