Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
This analysis aims to determine the process, the effectiveness and feasibility of the advanced reading
comprehension learning material based on Google Sites to improve student’s ability to understand the text. In
accordance with the results of the needs analysis, students need a new material. So, it is developed according to
their needs. In addition, Google Sites is accessible online and can be run on a computer, laptop or tablet. This
development uses the approach of ADDIE by Robert Maribe Branch (2009), namely: Analysis, Design,
Development, Implementation and Evaluation. The result of the evaluation shows that: the validation of the
material and media has the average score of 93%, in addition, the average score of students in the pre-test is 55
and post-test is 78. This means that there is a significant increase in students' skills and it is worth using. This is
proven by the normality test which shows that the data is normally distributed. The pre-test data has the value of
Sig. 0.686 and the post-test data have the sig value. 0.054, according to the basis of decision-making in shapiro
wilk normality test, if the value is sig. > 0.05, it is mentioned that there is a difference between before and after
using learning media. Therefore, advanced reading comprehension learning material using Google Sites meets
the aspects of feasibility and efficiency and this site can improve the skills of students in Advanced Reading
Comprehension course.
2. LITERARY REVIEW
communication between a source of
One of the important components in information and a receiver (Smaldino,
learning is learning materials. Good and 2011:7). Meanwhile, media learning is a
bad materials will greatly affect the component of delivery strategies that can
achievement of learning objectives. be loaded with messages to students,
Therefore, the development of learning media can be in the form of tools, people
materials is needed to increase learning or materials (Degeng, 2013:162). It means
activities and teacher motivation in that learning media is a means used to
carrying out learning in the classroom convey information or learning materials
(Dubin and Olstain, 1992). Besides that, to students.
media is a plural form of media
understanding which is a means of According to Harsanto (2012:3), Google
Sites is a product of Google as a tool for it is ideal for beginners who want to create
creating websites. Users can benefit from a website for the first time. Google Sites is
Google Sites because it is easy to create easy to use. One can quickly and easily
and manage by ordinary users. Often users create a functional multi-page website. In
stop halfway through creating or addition, Google takes care of security
maintaining a site due to the complexity of issues. It's integrated with Google
creating and maintaining it. Google is Applications This means that Google Sites
trying to meet this need by launching functions such as maps, YouTube, Google
Google Sites. It does not require a complex form, wikipedia, calendars and documents
high-level programming language. It is an can be integrated into users' websites.
interesting tool to learn. First of all, it's Users can work on a single website at the
free. Second, it's easy to do. Third, it same time without having to worry about
allows users to collaborate on their use. interrupting the work of others. It's the best
Fourth, it provides 100MB of free online real-time collaboration. Plus, the creator
storage. Fifth, of course searchable, which can access the tools anywhere. This means
means it can be searched using the Google users can use it anywhere as it can be
search engine. There are still several other opened with laptops. It is very useful to
cool things that can be crafted from this develop this learning medium, especially
tool. When logged into our personal in the advanced reading comprehension
Google account, we can go to course. This research is very important in
sites.google.com and get started right learning French because it adds a lot of
away. No risk, no upsells, no expiration new knowledge.
dates or limits. It's totally free. In addition,
3. RESEARCH DESIGN
This research model refers to the Robert The data analysis technique used is a
Maribe Branch model or the ADDIE quantitative analysis technique. The data
model. There are five main stages in the obtained is data on the validation of
Branch model: Analysis, Design, advanced reading comprehension learning
Development, Implementation and material using Google Sites in the French
Evaluation. This research has done at the section. This data was collected through
department of French at Universitas materiel expert validation and media
Negeri Medan. This research is done in expert validation. The questionnaire is
the class of Reguler C fourth semester of given to the validator, which is in the form
with the total number is 11 students. Then, of a Likert scale to which a score is
the object of this study is the media expert assigned as indicated in the following
and the material expert; this means that table:
they will validate the learning material
developed. We apply the plan of a group Table 1. Criteria for Validating
of pre-test - post-test (one group pretest- Responses with a Likert Scale
postest design) that of Sugiyono (2011:
110): Categories Score
Explication: Very Good 5
O1 = Pre-test Good 4
X = Traitement Quite Good 3
O2 = Post-test Bad 2
Very Bad 1
We calculate the average score ofthe
The data was analyzed using descriptive students' test and measure the
statistics (average score and percentage), significance of tests. To calculate the
which consists of calculating the average score of the pre-test and post-
percentage of the advanced reading test, we use the formula:
comprehension learning material based
Google Sites usage indicators for each ∑𝑥
𝑋=
category: 𝑁
Explication :
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 X= average pre-test/post-test score
𝑋= × 100% ∑x= total pre-test/post-test score
𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟
N= number of samples
Calculating the research data using the The normality test used the Kolmogrov-
formula above will produce figures as a Smirnov (K-S) via the SPSS 20 program.
percentage (%). The score classification is As the basis of decision-making in the
then converted into a percentage Shapiro wilk normality test:
classification (Sugiyono, 2012: 137) and a. If the value of p value or sig < 0.05
then interpreted with the qualitative therefore the data is not considered as
phrases listed in the following table. normally distributed
b. If the value of p value or sig > 0.5
Table 2. Percentage criterion of learning then the data is considered normally
material indicators distributed
Categories Interval
Very Good 81% ≤ skor ≥ 100% After the normality test is already done,
then the data is processed to calculate the
Good 61% ≤ skor ≥ 80% significance of the students' competence
Quite Good 41% ≤ skor ≥ 60% with the following conditions:
a. If the data is normally distributed, the
Bad 21% ≤ skor ≥ 40% T-Test will be used
b. If the data is not normally distributed,
Very Bad 0% ≤ skor ≥ 20% the Wilcoxon Test will be used
According to this table above, the The result of the advanced reading
minimum and maximum score of students comprehension learning material
on the pre-test is 40 and 82 with the effectiveness based on Google Sites is
average score is 55. And then, the calculated using statistical tests to make
minimum and maximum score of students the results valid, such as: the Normality
in the post-test are 70 and 97 with the test and the N-Gain test. The normality test
average score is 78. Therefore, it can be can be used to determine whether students'
concluded that there is a progression of pre- and post-test results are normally
students' skills during the advanced distributed. A normality test is first
reading comprehension course after using performed to determine whether the data
the Google Sites web. So, increasing set is statistically close to the normal
students' comprehension skills after using distribution. To test the normality of the
this medium is successful. data, the Liliefors test is used.
Based on the result of the normality test of in the Shapiro wilk normality test above, it
the SPSS (Statistikal Package for the can be concluded that the data The
Social Sciens) software, one can discover student's pre-test and post-test are
the result of the Shapiro-Wilk normality normally distributed. Since the above data
test with the amount of data is <50. The is distributed normally, T-test
pre-test data has the value of Sig. 0.686 (independent sample test) can be
and the post-test data has the value of sig. performed, as the assumption of data
0.054. Since the sig. value for both data > normality was fulfilled by the Shapiro
0.05 then as the basis for decision-making Wilk test.
Based on the output group statistic table students before and after using the learning
above, it is known that the average value media based on Google Sites. In addition,
of the pre-test is 55.45 and that of the post- to prove whether the difference is
test is 78.45, so statistically descriptive, it significant or not, the following matched
can be concluded that there is a difference sample test output must be interpreted:
in the average learning outcomes of
Based on the above output, we know that So, since the t-count value is 7473 > t-
the value Sig. is 0.001 < 0.05, it can be table 2228, then as the basis for making
concluded that there is a progression in the the decision can be concluded that H0 is
mean value before and after the treatment, rejected and Ha accepted. This therefore
which means that there is an influence of means that there is an improvement in the
the use of this advanced reading average learning results seen from the
comprehension learning material using results of the pre-test and the post-test,
Google Sites. which means that there is an influence on
the use of the advanced reading
Based on the paired sample test output comprehension learning material using
table, the value of t-count is -7.473. T- Google Sites in the improving students'
count is negative because the mean value reading comprehension skills during
of the pre-test is lower than that of the advanced reading comprehension.
post-test. In this context, negative t-count
can mean positive, so the number of t-
count is 7.473.
C. Efficiency Result
0.83
0.61 0.65
0.57 0.53 0.51 0.48 0.48 0.51
0.42
0.37
0.16
From the result of the N-Gain Test, high. So, this indicates that the
the average score of N-Gain (g) = 0.51. effectiveness of using the learning medium
Based on the criteria of the gain index by during advanced reading comprehension
Meltzer (2002: 1260) where (g) < 0.3 = using Google Sites is in the middle
low, 0.7 > (g) > 0.3 = medium, (g) ≥ 0.7 = category.
5. CONCLUSION
increases the skills of the students. The
The development process of the advanced result of the efficiency using the N-Gain
reading comprehension learning material Test shows that the average score of N-
using Google Sites is valid or feasible. Gain (g) = 0.51 which means in the
Based on the result of the pre-test and average category. This means that the
post-test of the students, it presents that effectiveness of the use of advanced
the average score of the students in the reading comprehension learning material
pre-test is 55 and post-test is 78. It using Google Sites is effectively used
expresses that there is a progression in during advanced reading comprehension.
the proficiency of the students before and
after using the advanced reading REFERENCES
comprehension learning material using
Google Sites. This is consistent with the Aparicio, Manuela.2016.An e-Learning
results of the normality test. The pre-test Theoretical Framework. Journal.
data has the value of Sig. 0.686 and the Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.
post-test data has the value of sig. 0.054.
Since the value sig. for both data is > Bessenyei, et al. 2008. E-Learning
0.05 then as the basis for decision making Teachers challenged by the Net
in the Shapiro wilk normality test where Generation. Hungaria : Tenegen
if the value of sig. > 0.05 it is indicated Consortium.
that there is a difference between before
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional
and after using the learning medium. So,
Design-The ADDIE Approach.
it can be concluded that the pre-test and
New York: Springer.
post-test data of the student are normally
distributed and this learning material
Degeng, Nyoman S. 2013. Ilmu Smaldino, Sharon. E., Lowther, Deboran.
Pembelajaran Klasifikasi Variabel L., Russel, James.D. (2011).
Untuk Pengembangan Teori Teknologi Pembelajaran dan
Penelitian. Bandung: Kalam Media untuk Belajar. (Alih Bahasa:
Hidup. Arif Rahman). Jakarta:
KENCANA.
Dominic, Maria. 2013. An Assessment of
Popular e-Learning Systems via Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian
Felder-Silverman Model and a Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.
Comprehensive-Learning System Bandung: Afabeta.
using the Tools on Web 2.0. I.J.
Modern Education and Computer Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian
Science, 2013, 11, 1-10. Journal. Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.
Sacred Heart College India. Bandung: Alfabeta.