Professional Documents
Culture Documents
06 Conclusion/Recommendation
Motivation
By combining the magnet shaping and step of slotting at the magnet edge,
the CT of machine can be reduced to less than 1 %.
Fig.1 CT Reduction for Inset-PMSM
Selection of CT Reduction Method
Fig.2 Modification the magnet rotor using magnet edge one step of slotting
Fig.3 Modification of rotor structure using two steps of slot
Fig.4 Conventional Magnet rotor
Fig.5 One slot in magnet edge
Fig. 6 two steps of slotting at the magnet edge
In modification of rotor core to reduce the CT has
been selected (see Figure 1).
Stator teeth width and length For rotor and stator core,
are the same size the machine uses M-19
where ;
R = air gap reluctance
θ = mechanical degree of rotor rotation
Another formula for CT computation
continue
Fig.7 Cogging torque reduction of integral slot number (30 slot /10 pole )
Fig.8 Cogging Torque reduction for fractional slot number (24 slot /10 pole )
Improvement of CT Methods
• For one slot in magnet edge, the CT peak value reduces to 0.4361457 Tesla.
The CT reduction the PMSM is = 82.61 %
• For two slots in magnet edge, the CT peak value decreases to 0.0465475
Tesla. The CT reduction of the PMSM is = 98.14 %
Fractional Slot Number
The initial value of CT of the fractional Slot number (24 slot / 10 pole),
the initial CT of PMSM is 0.2352206 Tesla
And, for two slot at magnet edge, the CT of the PMSM decreases to
0.0006905 Tesla. The CT reduction is = 99.71 %.
Conclusion