Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rationale
The Memory for design test examines visual recall of an individual based on brain
damage versus functional disorder versus normality. It is popular test for examination of
brain damage. The test was administered on child for academic purpose.
Identifying Data
Age: 14years
Gender: boy
Institute: R.S.I
Behavioral Observation
At the time of test administration, the child seemed well groomed, hygiene and
grooming were appropriate for age. He worn uniform appropriately, shoes were polished but
not tied. The child appeared smaller than his stated age. He had large bulging eyes. The child
maintained eye contact. He was showing compliance on the trainees’ instructions. The client
on seat behavior was present. The tone of his voice was normal. Child’s level of arousal
fluctuated during testing; child was sometimes highly distractible and at other times
demonstrated good attention to the tasks. The trainee begins from greeting in which the client
properly responded. His speech was fully developed as noted by his sentence structure. He
was in happy mood as the trainee asked him for doing activity related drawing various
shapes. The trainee gave him proper instructions regarding test as she asked him you will be
shown different types of cards one by one that have different shapes on them. The client has
to view the design for five seconds before it was removed from his view and you have to
copy these shapes on a blank paper the same way. Let’s start this activity now, you
understand very well. The client smiled and responds properly. The child looked carefully at
the shapes on the card and tried to make them into paper in the same way. The child
demonstrated appropriate grip on pencil; and no hand preference was observed as he was
right handed. The child was distracted by the surroundings again and again during copying
these shapes. His attention span was not up to the mark. At first he tried to make these
pictures with great eagerness, but gradually he got tired of this activity and then he tried to
Quantitative Interpretation
Table 1
Borderline 2-6
Qualitative Interpretation
Qualitative interpretation gave the frequency of four types of Orientation Error (OE)
The 45º Rotation, which had the most limited opportunity to occur, being found only in
response to Design 2 and 11, nevertheless accounted for a greater number of OEs than did
any other type. In contrast, the vertical reversal on 4 designs, the horizontal rotation on nine
designs and the 90 º Rotation on ten of the design occurred. The client faced problem in
drawing 5th, 7th, 8th shape. In shape 11, 12, 13 and 14 participant omitted the lines and draw
incomplete shape. The grand total of child’s score on memory for design test was 21, the
scores falls under the range of 7 and above. This indicated that the child had brain damage, as
The test showed that the child has severe brain damage in area of cognition and
memory. His focus and concentration in drawing pictures was poor few designs were
opposite done by the child. Some lines of different shapes were omitted and client faced the
difficulty in drawing complex shapes. So by the results it was conclude that the client had
intellectual disability.
Limitations
The test was administered in library where environment was very distracting due to
It was the first experience of trainee to administering the neurological tests on special
The weather was too hot and the client felt lethargy
Recommendation
There must be separate room for sessions and test administration for special children