You are on page 1of 9

611

New method of in-situ fabrication of protective coatings


based on Fe–Al intermetallic compounds
T Chmielewski and D A Golan´ ski*
Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta, Warsaw, Poland

The manuscript was received on 8 July 2010 and was accepted after revision for publication on 27 July 2010.

DOI: 10.1177/2041297510394050

Abstract: The paper presents the initial investigation results on producing surface
protec- tive coatings made of Fe–Al intermetallic compounds on steel substrates. The Fe–Al
coating is obtained in a two-step process. First, the steel substrate is thermally sprayed
with pure alu- minium having a thickness of about 0.3 ◦mm. In this way both components (Fe,
Al) are prepared for subsequent melting and synthesis. In the final step, the aluminium
coating is remelted together with the surface of the steel substrate by the CO2 laser beam. The
resulting molten pool
consists of aluminium and iron in equal parts, allowing it to form a Fe–Al intermetallic
com- pound during the in-situ process of remelting. The formation of Fe–Al intermetallic
compound has been verified by the microhardness and X-ray diffraction measurements of
the analysed coatings. The developed method is a cheap alternative compared with other
surface modifi- cation processes utilizing commercially prepared intermetallic coating
materials. In addition, the remelting process substantially increases the strength of the
coating bond, which has a magnitude close to that observed for hard-facing processes.

Keywords: coatings, laser remelting, intermetallics

1 INTRODUCTION The main production costs are related to the


base materials and processing. The traditional
Intermetallic compounds have been considered to methods of intermetallic production use melting
be functional materials with specific chemical and and cast- ing processes, which seemed to be
phys- ical properties for over 20 years. Year by year, insufficient. The new methods of intermetallic
they are being more widely used in engineering fabrication are based on powder metallurgy,
applications owing to the vast exploration of this utilizing consolidation tech- niques with
group of materials and the development in the components of materials in the base as well as
science of intermetallics [1, 2] complex forms [3, 4].
Difficulties in the application of intermetallics lie The intermetallic compounds are very often applied
in their high brittleness at room temperature. in industry as a protective surface layer. In most
Other problems are connected with the production cases, the deposited material is composed of
of bulk machine parts having solid small grain specially pre- alloyed intermetallic powder which is
structure without microcracks and discontinuities. commercially available as the raw material, but in
Nowadays, an increasing interest in the application such cases the coating production may be rather
of Fe–Al intermetallics may be observed. This is the expensive [5].
effect of their relatively low price compared to other The thermal spraying of intermetallics has
intermetallic materials. been known and used in industry for many years [6,
7]. This method has many advantages but it is
important to realize the weak points of this process,
*Corresponding author: Institute of Manufacturing Technolo-
which are the tendency for coating delamination,
gies, Department of Welding Engineering, Warsaw University of
limited coating adhesion to the substrate (below
Technology, Narbutta 85, room 221, Warsaw 02-524, Poland.
40◦MPa), porosity,
email: dgol@wip.pw.edu.pl
limited thickness of the coating (up to 0.4◦mm), and
Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering
2 T Chmielewski and D A Golan
reduced resistance to concentrated loads.
In the current paper a novel two-stage approach
is introduced which allows for in-situ fabrication
of

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering


611

Fe–Al intermetallic layers utilizing traditional thermal was used to produce an aluminium layer, which in
joining methods. This process offers several advan- the second stage was subsequently remelted to obtain
tages over the previously mentioned methods. the Fe–Al surface layer.

2 EXPERIMENTAL WORK
2.1 Thermal spraying
The process of fabrication of Fe–Al intermetallic com- The thermal arc spraying method was used to deposit
pounds was performed in two stages. The first a 0.3◦mm aluminium layer (using 1.6◦mm pure
stage alu- minium wire) on to the substrate material
made of unalloyed steel (98.5 per cent Fe) in the form
of a pipe with diameter of 30◦mm. The
microstructure of ther-
mally sprayed aluminium coating is shown in Fig. 1.
The diffraction patterns obtained from the layer show
that the coating is composed of aluminium (see Fig. 2).
In this way the two main components, that is alu-
minium in the coating and iron in the substrate, have
been prepared for melting and synthesis to obtain the
Fe–Al intermetallic layer.

2.2 Laser remelting


In the final stage of the introduced method, the
deposited aluminium coating is remelted
together with the surface of the steel substrate
Fig. 1 The microstructure of aluminium layer thermally
(at the total thickness of 0.6◦mm) by a concentrated
sprayed on to the steel (S235JR) substrate
energy beam (CO2 laser) (see Fig. 3). The established
metallic pool

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering


4 T Chmielewski and D A Golan
Fig. 2 Diffraction patterns of thermally sprayed aluminium layer

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering


New method of in-situ fabrication of protective 61

Fig. 3 The scheme of mutual remelting of aluminium coating and steel substrate

(liquid metal area) is composed in equal parts of the precipitated Al2O3 grains not larger than 2◦µm. The
aluminium coating and partly melted steel substrate.
The surface of the aluminium coating after remelt-
ing is shown in Fig. 4(a). The total width of the bead
produced was about 3.5◦mm. To form such a wide
bead it is necessary to make several passes, each
of them lapping the previous one at the distance of
0.8◦mm. Figure 4(b) presents the coating that
has been remelted with multiple lap passes of
the CO2 laser beam.
The concentrated laser beam allowed
particular metallurgical conditions to be created in
which a new compound with equal parts of
aluminium and iron was formed.

2.3 Microstructure examination


The basic metallographic examination was used to
characterize the microstructure and hardness of
the remelted layer. Figure 5 presents the
microstructure of the aluminium coating taken
from the region cov- ering the boundary between
sprayed and remelted material. On the left side of
the picture the partially melted sprayed aluminium
coating can be seen, while the right part shows the
remelted layer.
It is possible to distinguish a new alloy formed in
the layer with a cell structure that is typical for
intermetal- lic compounds. The structure of this
material is built of grains having an average size of
20◦µm and dispersion
Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering
61 T Chmielewski and D A Golan
existence of Al2O3 particles evenly distributed in
the volume of the remelted area may have a positive
effect on the tribological properties of the layer
produced.
The remelted layer is free of cracks and
porosity, which is typical for coatings deposited
by thermal spraying. The process ensures that the
coating is tight and lacks geometric notches acting
as stress concen- trators. The biggest advantage of
the applied remelt- ing process, compared to the
traditionally sprayed methods, is the
development of metallurgical bonds between
coating and substrate, giving an adhesion strength
that is higher by one order of magnitude, and close
to values typical for hard-facing methods.
The diffraction patterns of the analysed
remelted layer are shown in Fig. 6. They confirm
the existence of Fe–Al intermetallic compound as
the main struc- tural component in the layer. A
small fraction of other incidental phases (Al2O3 and
FeSi2) is also reported. The Al2O3 phase is formed
during remelting owing to the reaction of
aluminium with oxygen from the air. It has not
been observed in the layer obtained in the first
stage of aluminium deposition.

2.4 Microhardness testing


To confirm the existence of Fe–Al intermetallic
com- pound in the remelted layer, the
microhardness measurements have been
conducted using a Leitz– Wetzlar tester µHV0.1
with 20◦s loading time. The microhardness
distribution across the steel substrate
and the remelted layer is shown in Fig. 7. To check

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering


New method of in-situ fabrication of protective 61

Fig. 4 The surface view of the aluminium coating remelted by the laser beam: (a) after a single pass;
(b) after multiple lapping passes

Fig. 5 The microstructure of remelted aluminium coating (right), Nomarski, ×100

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering


61 T Chmielewski and D A Golan

Fig. 6 Diffraction patterns of remelted aluminium layer

Fig. 7 Microhardness distribution across the steel substrate and remelted layer

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering


New method of in-situ fabrication of protective 61

for a possible influence of the thermal cycle on Fe–Al solution. Its unique structure, mechanical, and
the substrate material the measurements have been service properties may create new application
con- ducted beneath the surface of the substrate paths for building machine components subjected
up to a depth of 2.5 mm. to high mechanical and thermal loads and
The reported hardness in the steel substrate working under severe wear conditions.
increased to 400 µHV0.1 only within the heat-affected
zone (HAZ), which covered the region of 0.3 mm
width directly adjacent to the melted zone. The © Authors 2011
mea- sured hardness in the remelted layer was
in the range 840–950 µHV0.1. This level is similar REFERENCES
to val- ues found in Fe–Al secondary solid-state
solutions. The obtained results reflect chemical, 1 Williams, J. C. Intermetallics for structural applications:
structural, and phase homogeneity of the layer potential, reality and road ahead. In Structural inter-
produced. metallics (Eds M.V. Nathal et al.), 1997, pp. 3–8 (The
Min- erals, Metals and Materials Society (TMS),
Warrendale, PA..
3 CONCLUSIONS 2 Stoloff, N. S., Liub, C. T., and Deevic, S. C. Emerg-
ing applications of intermetallics. Intermetallics, 2000, 8,
The proposed novel method is an alternative for 1313–1320.
currently used methods of surface modification 3 Durejko, T. and Bojar, Z. Fe–Al-based intermetallics
of steel utilizing expensive intermetallic coating obtained by modified method of pressing at elevated tem-
mate- rials (mostly in the form of powders). The perature. Kompozyty (Composites), 2002, 2/5, 323–327.
main advantage of the developed method is the low 4 Paldey, S. and Deevi, S. C. Single layer and multilayer
wear resistant coatings of (Ti, Al)N: a review. Mater. Sci.
cost of materials used, which are aluminium and
Engng A, 2003, 342, 58–79.
iron. They are the only components required to form 5 Grosdidier T., Tidu, A., and Liao, H. L.
a new com- pound layer by simultaneous remelting Nanocrystalline Fe-40Al coating processed by thermal
of a coating with the surface of the metallic spraying of milled powder. Scripta Materialia, 2001, 44,
substrate. Moreover, the applied method allows an 387–393.
adhesion level between the coating and substrate to 6 Totemeier, T. C., Wright, R. N., and Swank, W. D. FeAl
be produced that is higher by one order of and Mo–Si–B intermetallic coatings prepared by thermal
magnitude than that produced by thermal spraying. Intermetallics, 2004, 12, 1335–1344
spraying. 7 Senderowski, C. and Bojar, Z. Gas detonation spray
The presented method allows for in-situ form- ing of Fe–Al coatings in the presence of
produc- tion of protective coatings based on the interlayer. Surf. Coatings Technol., 2008, 202, 3538–
secondary 3548.

Proc. IMechE Vol. 225 Part B: J. Engineering

You might also like