Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Center Grove Presbyterian Church (CGPC) was chartered on October 23, 1983
as part of the PC (USA) denomination. This year we celebrate our 25th
anniversary! The church was the dream of a small group of families who wanted
to see a reformed church in the Center Grove area. Our church was planted by
Southport Presbyterian, under the leadership of organizing pastor, Quentin Small.
Our church has always had a heart for missions, and was founded with a policy
of using 50% of all undesignated giving to the Mission Fund – which is
administered separately from the General Fund.
According to the Presbyterian church, the first step in calling a new installed
pastor is to develop a Core Vision for CGPC – a picture of where we believe
God is calling us as a church family. The following story reflects what we have
discovered about our community and ourselves as shown in a Congregational
Survey taken on August 11, 2008.
Page 1 of 4
The Community
For this survey we defined the community as a 5-mile radius around the church.
In essence, our local mission field is mostly white, very affluent, well-educated,
and diverse among life-styles and age groups. The area has grown at twice the
national average and is poised for continued growth. The community is
predominantly traditional, 2-parent families.
The community feels most stressed by opportunities for security - like jobs,
retirement, time for leisure. Other areas of concern are health and
neighborhood safety.
Our Congregation
We had 212 people take the survey. Based on those responses, we found we
are very similar to the community. However, we are whiter, wealthier, better
educated and a little less diverse.
Page 2 of 4
Our congregation has grown at a pace even greater than the community
growth rate. This represents an increase of 248 or 129% since 1990. If the trend
since 2000 continues into the next five years, membership will increase by 260
bring our total membership to 700. Even if the interim period should slow the
trend, we should plan to grow to a size of 700 to 800 over the next 10 years.
The predominant age group in our church seems to be those aged 7–26 with
42% of the congregation falling into that group.
The survey tells us our congregation’s potential to give money to support the
church is “extremely high.” Despite this potential, we have faced extreme
pressures meeting our General Fund giving while easily covering our Mission
commitments for the past several years.
Our congregation also believes we should provide food and clothing resources,
spiritual retreats, theological discussions and bible studies.
The Gaps
Two kinds of gaps showed up in the survey: gaps between the congregation
and the community; and gaps between what we say we want and what we
actually provide.
One key non-gap to note: Both the church and community have a strong desire
for “recreation.”
The community desires several programs not offered by CGPC, and not rated as
important by us (according to survey results), including:
• Church sponsored Day School
• Marriage enrichment opportunities
• Personal or Family Counseling
• Parent Training Programs
• Day Care Services
• Twelve Step Recovery Programs
Page 3 of 4
The community also has a moderate desire for divorce recovery and care for
the terminally ill, but our church did not rate those as important.
The survey showed that CGPC has a strong heart for finding and meeting
community needs in the Center Grove area. For example, we rated ourselves as
doing poorly in community outreach. We also rated the areas of social justice
and local mission as very important.
According to the survey, CGPC has a very low resistance to change – lower
than the nation and lower than the community.
CGPC has a preference for more contemporary worship than the community as
a whole. We also want contemporary leadership that empowers, welcomes
new ideas, has an informal style and encourages lay leadership.
Summary
As we look toward a vision for the future we need to ask several questions about
how CGPC relates to the community and how our similarities and our gaps
affect our future.
Page 4 of 4