Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The marking plan set out below was that used to mark this question. Markers were encouraged to use discretion
and to award partial marks where a point was either not explained fully or made by implication. More marks were
available than could be awarded for each requirement. This allowed credit to be given for a variety of valid points
which were made by candidates.
Question 1
General comments
Part 1 of this question tested the preparation of a profit and loss account and a balance sheet.
Adjustments included irrecoverable trade debtors, a lease, an impaired asset, depreciation, taxation and
research and development expenditure. Part 2 required an explanation of the accounting treatment of the
held for sale asset under IFRS. Part 3 required an explanation of how the qualitative characteristics are
useful to users.
Guelder Ltd – Profit and loss account for the year ended 31 December 2020
£
Turnover 1,320,000
Cost of sales (W1) (857,275)
Gross profit 462,725
Administrative expenses (W1) (404,300)
Operating profit 58,425
Interest payable and similar charges (W5) (668)
Profit on ordinary activities before tax 57,757
Tax on profit on ordinary activities (12,800)
Profit for the financial year 44,957
Workings
W1 Expenses
Cost of Admin
sales expenses
£ £
Nominal ledger b/fwd 698,000 404,300
Opening stock 23,600
Closing stock (37,800)
Bad debt 3,800
R&D costs (W2) 90,700
Amortisation (W2) 7,700
Depreciation charges
(11,250 + 2,785 + 55,790) (W4) 69,825
Impairment (W3) 1,450
857,275 404,300
W3 Impaired asset
£
Original cost 25,000
Acc depreciation on classification as held for sale (18,750)
(25,000 x 15% x 5yrs)
Net book value at 31 December 2020 6,250
Less recoverable amount (sale proceeds less costs to (4,800)
sell (5,000 – 200))
Impairment 1,450
W5 Finance lease
(1.2) IFRS
Under IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations depreciation should cease
and the asset to be reclassified as held for sale. The asset will be removed from non-current assets in
property, plant and equipment and disclosed in the statement of financial position as a separate line under
‘current assets’.
Under IFRS, the machine would be held at the sale proceeds less costs to sell figure of £4,800. The
machine’s net book value of £6,250 would be removed from property, plant and equipment. However, the
decision to sell the asset would have triggered an impairment review and therefore its recoverable amount
would be assessed. Presumably its value in use would be lower than its fair value less costs to sell as the
decision has been made to sell the machine. Therefore, the machine would be held at £4,800 and an
impairment of £1,450 would still be recognised in profit or loss for the period.
Comparability ensures that users can identify and understand similarities in, and differences among, items.
Users’ decisions involve choosing between alternatives, for example, which company to make an
investment in. Information about a reporting entity is therefore more useful if it can be compared from one
reporting period to the next and with similar information from other entities. Comparability allows this.
Consistency, although not an enhancing qualitative characteristic itself is related to comparability. This
relates to the same methods being used to report the same item, so consistent accounting policies
governed by accounting standards. The disclosure of accounting policies is therefore key to ensure that
users can make a valid comparison between items. Comparability is the ultimate goal for users, but
consistency helps to achieve that goal.
Verifiability helps assure users that information faithfully represents the information provided – it provides
credibility to the financial information. It means that different knowledgeable and independent observers
could reach consensus that a particular depiction is a faithful representation. It may not always be possible
to verify some explanations and forward-looking financial information until a future date, however it can still
be useful to users provided that sufficient information is provided about the underlying assumptions made,
the method of compiling the information etc.
Timeliness is equally important as information becomes less useful the longer the time delay in reporting it.
Timeliness means that information is available to investors, lenders and other creditors in time for it to be
used in their decision making processes.
Finally, the characteristic of understandability means that information that may be difficult to understand is
made more useful by presenting and explaining it as clearly as possible. Whilst financial information should
be presented clearly and in an understandable manner, it is expected that users of the financial statements
have a reasonable level of knowledge and understanding. It would be misleading to exclude information
simply because of its complex nature, as this would lead to incomplete information which would be
misleading to users. Users with a reasonable level of financial knowledge and understanding would be
expected to be able to review and analyse the financial information diligently, although even they may
require expert assistance at times.
Question 2
General comments
Part 1 of this question required candidates to explain the financial reporting treatment of four accounting
matters, given in the scenario. The matters covered component depreciation, redeemable preference
shares, a government grant and a joint venture. Part 2 required a revised calculations for profit, creditors
falling due after more than one year and capital and reserves along with a revised debt/equity ratio. Part 3
asked for an explanation of how the redeemable preference shares would be accounted for in accordance
with FRS 105, The Financial Reporting Standards Applicable to the Micro-entities Regime. Part 4 required
a discussion about the ethical issues surrounding the scenario.
(2.1)
The new equipment has been correctly recognised at its cost of £50,000 as part of tangible fixed assets on
the date of acquisition. However, where an asset is made up of more than one component part that has
different useful lives these should be recognised as separate assets.
If the asset is made up of a number of components with different useful lives these will need to be
depreciated separately in order for the cost of each to be recognised over its usage.
Hence, only the main part of the equipment, without its lasers should have been depreciated over the 10
years and the lasers should be depreciated over 2 years.
The whole piece of equipment was instead depreciated over 10 years, so depreciation of £5,000 (50,000 /
10years) was charged.
Hence an additional £2,400 depreciation should have been expensed, reducing profit for the period and
tangible fixed assets in the balance sheet. The equipment should have had a net book value of £42,600
(50,000 – 4,400 – 3000) rather than £45,000.
The redeemable preference shares have been recognised as part of capital and reserves. However, in
substance per FRS 102, Section 22 Liabilities and Equity the financial instrument has the characteristics of
a liability rather than equity. There is a contractual obligation to deliver cash at regular intervals in the form
of preference shares. The shares are then redeemed at a fixed amount at a fixed point in time.
The preference dividend is instead treated as an interest payment and recognised as part of profit or loss.
The £300,000 should not be recognised as part of equity, this should be reversed and instead be
recognised as part of creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year measured at amortised cost
using the effective interest rate of 6.75%.
At the year end recognise £305,250 as part of creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year,
remove the £15,000 from capital and reserves and instead recognise £20,250 as part of interest payable
and similar charges as part of profit or loss. There will be a net reduction in the profit and loss account
reserve in capital and reserves of £5,250 as a result of this adjustment.
FRS 102, Section 24 Government Grants requires grants to be recognise when there is reasonable
assurance that:
• The entity will comply with the relevant conditions, on receipt of the grant the initial condition has
been met to set up a training scheme and intend to retain at least 25% of trainees; and
• The entity will receive the grant, Wayfaring Ltd is already in receipt of the grant.
Although both of these initial conditions have been met there is a further condition to be met regarding the
training scheme being run for two years. Therefore, although Wayfaring Ltd expects to meet the
conditions the grant should not be recognised in full in the profit and loss account on the date of receipt.
This is an income-related/revenue grant and as Wayfaring Ltd uses the accrual model it should be
recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the period in which the related expenditure is being
incurred. It is against the accrual principle to recognise the grant in profit or loss on a cash receipts basis
as Wayfaring Ltd currently has.
The training period is for 24 months commencing 1 April 2020. It therefore seems reasonable that the
grant should be recognised over two years from 1 April 2020 (or 9 months). As there is no identification of
the costs involved over the two years a straight-line basis has been applied, however if costs vary each
year another basis may be considered more appropriate.
£56,250 (150,000 / 2yrs = £75,000 x 9/12) of income (or netted against the relevant costs) should be
recognised in the year ended 31 December 2020. The remaining £93,750 should be reversed from other
income and recognised as deferred income, as part of creditors. The liability should be split £75,000 as
creditors: amounts falling due within one year and the remaining £18,750 as creditors: amounts falling due
after more than one year.
Wayfaring Ltd should recognise its investment in Sitka Ltd as a joint venture. Wayfaring Ltd and Aspen Ltd
have joint control over Sitka Ltd and there is a contractual agreement in place to share profits equally and
unanimous consent is required for all key operating decisions.
FRS 102, Section 15 Interests in Joint Venture, requires the use of the equity method to account for joint
ventures. The investment of £40,000 has been correctly recognised at cost as a fixed asset investment.
As the shares were subscribed for at par there is no implicit goodwill arising in the investment in Sitka Ltd.
This will then be increased each period by Wayfaring Ltd’s share of the joint venture’s post acquisition
increase in net assets. This is £16,300 (£32,600 x 50%).
The £16,300 will be shown in the consolidated profit and loss account as a single line, called ‘Share of
profit of joint venture’.
As there has been inter-company trading between Wayfaring Ltd and Sitka Ltd and the goods are still held
by Sitka Ltd there is an element of unrealised profit which should be adjusted for. The unrealised profit
element relating to Wayfaring Ltd is £600 (6,000 x 25/125 x 50%). This should reduce Wayfaring Ltd’s
profits for the period (increase cost of sales) and reduce the carrying amount of the investment in Sitka
Ltd. The trade debtor is not removed, if it was unpaid at 31 December 2020 as Sitka Ltd is not
consolidated.
The investment in joint venture in the consolidated balance sheet is shown as a separate line and should
be £55,700 (40,000 + 16,300 – 600) at 31 December 2020.
(2.2)
Under FRS 105 all financial instruments are treated in accordance with Section 9, Financial Instruments.
Liabilities are initially measured at the transaction price, less transaction costs where these are material.
At the end of the accounting period financial liabilities are measured at initial cost plus interest payable,
less any interest and capital payments made. An effective interest rate is not used.
At 31 December 2020 the carrying amount of the redeemable preference shares under FRS 105 would
be:
£
Transaction price 300,000
Dividend payable (300,000 x 5%) 15,000
Dividend paid (15,000)
At 31 December 2020 300,000
Willow should act with integrity and should not be associated with any reports containing false or
misleading information. At present there are a number of areas that have not been treated correctly in the
draft financial statements, for example, the treatment of the redeemable preference shares being
recognised as equity rather than debt. It is unclear who made these errors whether it was Balsa, the
finance director or Willow’s predecessor, however professional accountants should comply with relevant
laws and financial reporting standards. This is the need to maintain professional behaviour at all times.
Most of the adjustments required negatively impact on profit and also increase the level of debt reported
which will thereby increase the debt/equity ratio. It is unclear whether these were genuine mistakes or they
were recognised this way deliberately to reduce gearing. However, these errors need correcting.
Willow should not allow bias, conflict of interest or undue influence of others to override professional
judgements. There is self-interest threat here for Willow, as they have only just joined the company and
want to make a good impression. Willow may also feel pressured, intimidation threat to not make the
adjustments so that the directors and all employees get their end of year bonus.
The revised debt/equity ratio is above 1 and therefore this will be seen to discourage the new investment
being made.
Question 3
General comments
Part 3.1 of this question required a calculation for the revaluation reserve at the end of the reporting
period. An extract from the statement of cash flows was also required, detailing cash flows from investing
activities and cash flows from financing activities. Part 3.2 required revised calculations for profit and EPS.
(3.1)
(3.2)
Workings
(3.3)
Question 4
General comments
Part 1 of this question required an explanation of the accounting treatment for the disposal of a subsidiary
along with supporting calculations. Part 2 required the preparation of a consolidated balance sheet for a
parent and two subsidiaries one of which was acquired in the year and one was disposed of. Consolidation
adjustments included deferred consideration, unrealised profit on inter-company trading, recognition of an
intangible asset on acquisition and a fair value adjustment on acquisition, resulting in additional
depreciation.
The profit on disposal should be calculated by comparing the sale proceeds with the parent’s share of the
net assets and goodwill at the date of disposal. The net assets at the date of disposal will be those at 31
December 2019 plus the profit earned by Elder Ltd until the 1 August 2020, the date of disposal.
Workings
(4) PURP
% £
Selling price 100 12,000
Cost 80 (9,600)
Gross profit 20 2,400
148,950
(6) Investments
£
Per draft 543,000
Less Elder Ltd consideration (part 4.1) (385,000)
Less Aspen Ltd consideration (W5) (150,000)
8,000