Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v ! (') f- (
,
. ,
"
\
) \
DESIGN NOTE
r
11
CI / SIB 121.1 )
(~ - r --
F 1M2) ,
I March 19 9 0
" Published by the Brick Development Association
I .
"
r
.,J ~
, ,\ / ) II
.I 1 f
\
, f I,) '\
, .
)( }1 f1./
,\ / MPROVED STANDARDS
~
I )
I \1
(
(
I .:\ )
l
) OF INSULATIQN?
I N;
'
') ) or
./
'f
,
0
\ } r:;;'} ( f
"
v r
---
, )! /
~ .
~
)
J ) ') (
y
--
->,
J
j
#
(
THE
BRICK' \ /
/
1 -
'
)
\
-'
(
".
/
?
oJ
( / ) ( )
! DEVELOPMENT '(", - ~
-l ,/
ASSOOATION J 1(\-< Y
t '-L
-' l- I- I '
;;- ./
y'
-'
INTRODUCTION
. - ~
Maximum 'U' value (W/m 'KI -
--' ~
Building Type Wall Roof ' Ground ~I o o r
>.\. \ 'J
Former Improved Former Improved Former Improved
- v T
Dwellings 0.60 0 ,45 \ . 0.3S 0 .2S None ' 0 ,45
Industria l BUildin gs 0.70 0.45 0.70 0.45 None 0 ,45
Other Buildings
(e.g. Offices) 0.60 0.45 0.60 0.45 None 0.45
( ~ «
/
.J ~ , 'J\. Theimal cond ucti vity
produ ct
/ ,
J British Sta ndard , ' IW/ m K) -
DESIGN OPTIONS
The ca lculatio n of a ' U' value to r an may have an inn er lea f of 100mm
exte rnal wall of 103mm brick, 50m m den se block throug h to 200 mm of ultr a
glas s fibre lnsulatlon-filled cavity a nd lightweigh t block, with eit her wet
103mm brick produces a calc ulated pla stered or dry lined pla ster board
figure of 0.6 WI m' K. This does not finis he s. The infor ma tio n give n in
meet t he new requirement. To imp rove Table 3 a pplies to a par tia lly filled
the value to the requi red 0.45 WI m' K cavit y wall. Table 4 refers to a wall in
with dou ble leaf cons tructio n seve ral whic h the cavit y is completely filled
opt ions are availab le. by insu lation .
(1) Thicker Ins ulation Four different Therma l Conductivity
(2) Ins ulat ion of Less Therm a l value s of cavity insu lating material are
listed . This ran ge which covers th e
Cond uct tvlty
ma jority of t he ins ulati ng mater ials
(3) Thicker Inner Lea f used in practice Isee Table 21.
(4) Inner Leaf of Less The rmal The th icknesses of cavity insu lat ion
Conductt vtty have been ca lculated to give a 'U' value
of exac tly 0.4 5 WI m' K, In pra ctice, th e
(51 Plaste rboard Dry Li ning t hickne ss of the insu lation will be
(61 CDmbinati ons of any or all of dete rmined by comme rcial ava ilability
a bove option s of the slabs or batt s, Dr in the ca se of
injected insu lation (re tro -Ht) . by the
width of th e cavit y. The use of greate r
Tables 3 a nd 4 show th e variou s
thi cknesses t han given will provide
cavity wall const ruct ions that achieve a
lower ' U' va lues th an 0.45 WI m' K.
' U' value of 0.45 WI m' K, Cavity walls
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- -
For the pu rposes of calculation in (corres po ndi ng to Ther mal Conduc tivities
producing the tables of constructions varying from 0.73 to 1.24 W/ mKI.The
(Ta ble 3 and 4) the densi ty of the outer lea f of brickwork only co nt ri bu tes
brickwork in the oute r leaf has been about 5% to t he ov erall ther mal resist·
taken as 1800Kg/m 3 together with a ance and any varia tion i n the density
moisture con tent of 5% by volume of the brickwork has a very small
giving a corres po nding Thermal effect on th e t hermal perf ormance of
Conductivity of 0.96 W/ mK. the cavity wall.
In practice, brickwork densities com -
monly vary from 1600 to 2000 Kg/m 3 ,
Plaster or
Plasterboard
Table 3, Thickness of Insulation (mm) within a Partially Filled Cavity required ta achieve U .V,
Internal surface finish Wet plaster Plasterboard drylin ing -' Wet plaste r Plasterboarddrylinlng
Thermal
-
conductiv it y of cavit y ,
.022 .035 .040 .045 .022 .035 .040 .045 .022 .035 .040 .045 .022 .035 .040 .045,
-insula tio n
27 25
-
40 46 52 22 35 40 44
t hicknes s {mm} 125 12 19 22 24 8 13 15 17 22 36
- 41 46 19 30 34 38
150 11 12 14 7 ) 31
5 6 35 40 25 29 32
200 ~
0 0 - 0 0 0 0'
~.
22 25
~~ -<r 16 18
k
21
> Thermal conduct ivit y valu es for blo ckw ork and brickw ork are taken fr
INNER LEAF MATERIALS
It is the cav ity in sulation which Fou r d ifferent dens it ies of blocks for
no rmally makes t he ma jor contrib uti on the int ernal lea f of th e wall are
to th e overa ll the rmal res ist a nce of th e co nside red in th e Tables of Cons t ructions
wall : the inner leaf con trib utes to (Tables 3 a nd 4) . These de nsi ties are
varying degrees d ep endin g upon its ty pica l for t he co nc rete blocks
density and thickness . commonly availa ble for cavity wall
contructio n.
Lower density b locks ha ve bette r
insulati ng pro perties than those of some hollow blocks contain
highe r density. In recent years very low insulating ma te ria l wit hin their voids or
density conc rete blocks have be e n ins ulating materi al may be bonded to
made available in res ponse to the face of the block. These composites
re qu irem e n ts for improved therm a l have not b ee n includ e d in Tables 3 a nd
resista nce in maso nry walls . However. 4 due to the wide ra nge available.
low density is associated wit h low Designers ma y subst it ute such
com pressive streng th an d t he st ructural composites as a pp ro p riate .
req uire me nt of a wall ca n dict a te a
certai n mini mu m co mp ressive st re ngt h
wh ich preclud es th e use of blo cks of
very high the rm a l resistan ce.
INTERNAL FINISHES
The two most co mmon inte rna l
fini sh es a re we t p la st er a nd pl ast e r
board dr y linin g. The latter co nt ribu tes
mor e to th e overa ll th erm a l res istan ce
of t he wa ll. Composi te b oard s ha vin g
in sul ant s pr eb ond ed to pla st e rb oa rd a re
ava ila ble as dry lining to the in ner leaf
of masonry. Owing to th ei r wide va rie ty
these are not inclu ded in t he examples
in the ta bles .
-e-
Medium dens ity b lock Dense b lock . Brickwork
_ 1400 kg/m l 0 .51 W/m K 2300 kg7m ' 1.63 W/m K 1800 kg/m l ~
/"
Brickwork ~
• Wet plaster Pla sterb oard rylin ing / We t pla st e r
-
Plas terboa rd drylin in g r
./ I
J
~
1 ......
r ~
31 50 57 64~ 28 45 51 57 56 ~ 64 72 32 50 58 65
-48 1 ~
/'
55 62 43 ':- 49 55 55 , 63 71 ( 30 57 64
"
4'5 51 58
I
39 ' 45l
)
50 54 62 70 ' - J 49 56 6.3:'
n (' I.B.5.E. Gu ide A3 The rma l Prope rties of Build ing 5tru ctures 1980 .
APPLICATION OF TABLES
s ome examp le s of how these ta bles Case 2 - Determine Thickness of
can be us ed for determining a lte rn a tive Partial Fill in a Proposed Wall Design
s o lu tio ns a re g ive n b elow.
Inne r le af:
Wet pla stered ultra lightweight block
Case 1 - Determine Blown Insula tion
(tsornm) .
for an Existing Cavity Wall
Cavity: 5 0mm .
Inner Leaf :
wet pla stered , lightwei gh t bl o ck Oute r Leaf:
(100mm). 103mm cla y o r calci um s ilica te fa cin g
bri ck (1800 Kg/m 'l .
Cav ity : 50mm
Outer Lea f: What thi ckn es s of e xp a nded p olystyre ne
103mm cla y or ca lc iu m s ilica te fa cin g b ead board fixed in th e ca vity is
bri ck (1800 Kg/ m ' ). required to e ns u re that a maxim um 'U'
What typ e s of injec te d in sul at io n can va lue of 0.45 is not e xc eed ed?
be u sed t o o bta in a ' U' valu e of a t Referen ce to Tab le 2 gives a typical
least 0.4 5 W/ m' K? t hermal co nd uc tiv ity for e ps board of
Ref errin g to Tabl e 4, it s hows u nde r 0.03 5 W/mK . Loo king under t he
th e lightweight blo ck / wet p la stered a p pro pria te co lu m n in Ta ble 3 s ho ws
co lu mn, that a Thermal Conductivi ty fo r th at a minimim thi ck ne s s of 11 mm is
the ins ula ti o n b etween 0 .0 35 and 0.0 40 requ ired . Commercia lly a va ilable 25mm
W/ m K is required . Table 2 shows th at t hic k bo ard would th erefore be more
th e major ity of retr o-fit a pp lied mater ials tha n a de q ua te. Thi s would mean that
a re lik el y to m eet , o r exceed , t his the residual a ir s pa ce in the ca vity
requirmenl. wou ld be re stricted to 25mm if a
sta ndard 50mm s t ruct u ra l ca vit y wa s
s peci fie d . The re sidua l air s pa ce would
p rese nt di ffic ult ies of co ns t ruc tio n a nd
pre s ent a ris k of water penetration .
An inc rease of s truc t u ral wid t h to
75 m m s ho uld therefore be co ns ide re d
so that a re si du a l a ir s pa ce of 50mm
is provid ed .
Table 4. Th ickness of Insulation (mm) within a Completely Filled Cavity required to achieve U
Int ern a l su rface fin ish Wet pl a s te r Y' Pla sterboard drylining y We t plaster ; Pla ste rb oa rd d ryl ini n<
'\ . J Y J_. ) '0
Thermal
,. - , ( I ) J.
conductivity of ca vit y .0 2 2 .0 35 .0 40 .04 5 .0 22 .03 5 .040 .04 5 .0 22 .035 .0 40 .0 45 .0 22 .03 5 ..040 .0 4 .
_ ins u la tio n )./ !
. ( _ r ) (
.
150 17 20 12 13 15 ) 31 42 48 .3 2 36 41
200
\~ 1 1 o o o 28 32 36
.(
r 22 26
,
29
-.
' - ,A... . r- I . I
~'-"~ 1
r Medium density block " ~.
'"
Dense block -I.,' l;>'- -
1400 kg/m' v 0 .51. W/ ~ 23~ 0 kg/m ' / l' 1.63 W/ m K, ~
r> ,>, ~ t
(.. Wet pla st e \ () Wet pla ster 'J '" Jr. J A Brickwor
P la s'terboa rd'd ry lining 7'} _ '
k }"'::
~.44. ......." '--' _/
»<>: t \ ~
,Q22
l
,03S \ .040- .045
'"
122,.. .035 .040) .~ 4 5 .03 5 .040' .945'
I('
/ - ~ '
63 '( ,72,' 81 ~3 7
--"
16 66 60 67 ' 39
15 64 , 58~ .72 ,.39" .,62 {1' ~ ,J1 .0
62 ~ 49 -:: 56 63 r
62 I- 7 0 79 64 72 -, /
Durab ility of Outer Leaf Mate rial s Wall Ties In Wider Cavities
Althoug h the use of cavity insulation Some of t he op tio ns for ac hievi ng th e
will influe nce the te mp er a t u re of the im proved ' U' val ue requi re cavities
outer le a f, in p ra ct ice t here is no wide r than th e sta nd a rd SOmm.
evidence to show that insulation values
Table 3 shows th at the maximum
of 0 ·6 W/ m' K induce frost damage in
ca vity width to meet the 0.45 W/ m' K
walls which are prop e rly s pecified,
requirem e nt ca n be grea ter t han 100m m
designed a nd constructed . it is unlikely
when an a de quate allowance is made
that improved insulation values wou ld
for the residual air s pace .
change this situat ion .
The double t ria ngle tie to
Ra in Pe n etrati on B.S.1243 :1978'· ' is a p p rop ria te for use
in cavities not exceeding 100m m wide .
When improving the insulation val ue of
In all wider situatio ns t he ve rtical twis t
walls to 0·45 W/ m' K no d ep ar tu re
steel tie to the sa me B.S. must b e
from esta blished techniques of ca vity
used . The ties are offered in sta nda rd
ins u la tio n need be made and therefore
sizes and in all cases t he correct
the likelihood of water pen et ra ti on will
lengt h is th e cav ity width plu s a
not be inc re ased . When usi ng partial ·fill
minimum e m be d ment of SO mm in to
systems t he residual air s paces s hou ld
each leaf of the ma s onr y. in part ia lly
not be less than SOmm. However. the
filled cavi ti es the pos it ion of the wa ll
Britis h Boa rd of Agre me nt does pe rmi t
tie d rip mu st be relat ed to th e res idu al
the use of ce rtain pa rt ial ·fill systems
air s pace .
with resi d ua l ai r s paces of less than
SOmm in wa lls s he lte red fro m exposure
Cold Bridging
to win d dr iven ra in . When u sin g such
materials careful compliance with th e As therma l insulation sta nda rds for
manufacturers instructions re gardin g walls improve , more ca re must be taken
a pplicatio n and insta llation is es se ntial. whe n designi ng t he const ruction to
avoid co ld bridging across t he cav ity at
position s such a s the ja mb s. c ills and
head s of openings .
REFERENCES
The contentsof this publicationareintended for general guidanceonlyand any person Intending to use these contentsfor thepurpose ofdesign. construetJon
or repair of brickworkor anyrelated projectshould first consult a Professional Advisor.
TheBrick Development Association. Its servants, and any personswho contributed to or whoin anyway connected with thispublication acceptno liability
arising from negligence orotherwise howsoever for any Injury or damageto any person or propertyas a result ofany useor reliance on any method product.
Instruction, Idea, or other contentsof this publicatJon.
Designed andProducedfor the BrickDevelopment Association, Woodside House. Winkfield, Windsor, BerkshireSt 4 20X. Telephone: Winkfield Row (0344) 885651
By fWD Frank Walter Design Umited Printedin England by StewkJey Press Umited