CRITICAL APPRAISAL

CITATION:

POLA MAKAN DAN KEJADIAN HIPERTENSI

STUDY PURPOSE: Outline the purpose of the study. How does the study apply to
O Yes occupational therapy and/or your research question?
O No
LITERATURE :
Was relevant
background
literature reviewed ?
M
DESIGN : Describe the study design. Was the design appropriate for the study
O randomized (RCT) question ?(e.g., for kno wledge level about this issue, outcomes, ethical
O cohort issue,etc.)
O single case design
O before and after
O case-control Specify any biases that may have been operation and the direction of
O cross-sectional their influence on the result.
O case study

SAMPLE Sampling (who; characteristics; how many; how was sampling

N = 66 done ? ) if more than one group, was there similarity between the
Was the sample groups ?
described in detail ?
O Yes Describe ethics procedures. Was informed consent obtained?
O No

Was sample size

justified ?
O Yes
O No
O N/A
OUTCOMES Specify the frequeny of outcome measurenment (i.e., pre., post.,
Where the outcomes follow-up)
measures reliable? Penyakit jantung tersebut dapat dicegah dan dapat dideteksi lebih awal jika
O Yes diketahui faktor resiko pada setiap orang yang dapat menyebabkan penyakit
O No jantung tersebut. Dengan adanya peran kader dapat meningkatkan tentang

O Not Adressed promosi kesehatan dan deteksi dini resiko penyakit jantung sehingga
meningkatkan keterampilan kader dalam melakukan intervensi deteksi dini

Were the outcome resiko penyakit jantung.

measured valid?
Outcome areas;
O Yes Peran kader kesehatan dalam deteksi dini resiko penyakit jantung di
O No kelurahan Tambakreja Kabupaten Cilacap
O Not Addressed?
List Measured used:
Sasaran pelaksanaan adalah seluruh Kader Kesehatan, di RW 12 Kelurahan
Tambakreja sebanyak 8 kader kesehatan.
INTERVENTION Provide a short description of the intervention (focus, who delivered
Intervention was it, how often, setting). Could the intervention be replicated in
described in detail occupational therapy practice?
O Yes Penyakit jantung tersebut dapat dicegah dan dapat dideteksi lebih awal jika
O No diketahui faktor resiko pada setiap orang yang dapat menyebabkan penyakit
O Not Adressed jantung tersebut. Dengan adanya peran kader dapat meningkatkan tentang
promosi kesehatan dan deteksi dini resiko penyakit jantung sehingga
meningkatkan keterampilan kader dalam melakukan intervensi deteksi dini
resiko penyakit jantung.

RESULT:
Results were
What were the results? Were they statistically significant (i.e., p <
reported in terms of 0.05)? If not statistically significant was study big enough to show an
statistical important difference if it should occur? If there were multiple
significance? outcomes, was that taken into account for the statical analysic?
O Yes
O No
O N/A What was the clinical importance of the result ? were differences
O Not Addressed between groups clinically meaningful ? ( if Applicable)

Were the analysis

method(s)
O Yes
O No
O N/A
O Not Addressed

Clinical importance
was reported?
O Yes
O No
O N/A
O Not Addressed

Drop_Outs were Did any participants drop out from the study ? why ? ( were reasons
reported? given and were drop_out handled appropriately ?)
O Yes
O No
CONCLISIONS What did the study conclude ? what are the implications of these
AND CLINICAL results for occupational therapy practice ? what were the main
IMPLICATIONS : limitations or biases in the study ?
Conclusion were Simpulan pengabdian ini adalah pengetahuan kader dalam deteksi dini
appropriate given resiko penyakit jantung meningkat, keterampilan kader dalam deteksi dini
study methode and resiko penyakit jantung meningkat. Saran untuk pengabdian ini adalah
diharapkan kader dan warga untuk sering melakukan deteksi dini resiko
result
penyakit jantung untuk mencegah resiko penyakit jantung dan dapat
O Yes melakukan intervensi lebih dini terhadap factor resiko yang lebih dominan
O No terhadap penyakit jantung tersebut.