Divine Truth and The Return of Jesus

DIVINE TRUTH & THE
RETURN OF JESUS
Dean C. Liddell
DEAN C. LIDDELL MINISTRIES deancliddell96@hotmail.com
DEAN C. LIDDELL © 2022
“Divine Truth & the return of Jesus” ONLINE/PDF EDITION
DIVINE TRUTH
Λ & Ω
THE RETURN OF JESUS
© 2022 – Dean C. Liddell
Words of A.J. Miller in Red, Italicised and underlined.
This is an online publication and pdf made available by Dean C. Liddell. All rights reserved.
Originally published: 2nd of November 2022 A.D.

Current update: 13th of November 2022 A.D.
Update notice: Please note that this updated version includes more information
not included in the 2nd of November 2022 version. The content of
‘Divine Truth on Christianity and the Bible’, ‘Teachings on the
Return of Jesus’, ‘Teaching on prayer’, ‘God’s laws and sin’ were
added. Along with an additional 25 footnotes of information. All
from official Divine Truth teachings. If you want to see the
original, please email me at the email address provided
1
E: deancliddell96@hotmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Hello everyone.
It is Dean Liddell here; I am an evangelical Christian from the New South Wales Central Coast
region, which is just north of Sydney. This publication is for the people who want to know
about the organisation known as Divine Truth, and the founder of it, A.J. Miller, who claims
to be Jesus Christ. This publication is using online sources and is best viewed online. This
publication is best for anti-cult ministries, online content creators who speak out against
false-Christs, false-prophets, and false religions to use as a resource, and not their sole
source of information regarding Divine Truth and A.J., as I personally see it as a wise thing
to do to use the original sources of the organisation to talk about the teachings thereof. These
things I write, is also something that I wish my brothers and sisters in Christ had given me
before I started following A.J. Miller.
A NOTE FOR THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE TEACHINGS OF A.J. MILLER
For those who follow the teachings of A.J. Miller, which is commonly called Divine Love Path,
please not I do not do this due to any hatred towards A.J., nor towards Mary, but rather a
love of truth. In my study and writing of this publication, it is to find truth and it is to keep
a concise record of A.J. Miller, Mary Luck, and of Divine Truth’s teachings, to the best of my
ability. Granted, it is not a full record, compiling a complete record of all teachings of A.J and
Mary, and a full history of their lives, though, if anyone would do that task, in a readable
manner, with chapters and verses like The Bible, The Quran or any other sacred scripture
today, it would be a great companion and better source to study for an unbiased source. This
publication is for the purpose of Christians, such as Evangelical, Baptists, Anglican, and
other Christian denomination, as it was written to study the Christian based teachings, and
the claims of being Jesus and Mary Magdalene returned.
A NOTE FOR THOSE WHO ARE CHRISTIANS, ATHIEST,
AND RESEARCHERS OF CULTS, NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS
This publication’s main sources are available on the official website of Divine Truth, and
interviews that has been done by people in the past. I would also love to give this advice, if
you wish to contact A.J. Mary, or Divine Truth, please keep in accordance to their terms and
conditions, do so in love, kindness, and truth, and do not attack them, do not attack the
followers, but if you wish to engage with Divine Truth, or anyone who follows their teachings,
then make sure you do an effective study and do so in kindness and respect. I also give
permission for this to be used as a source for any series or documentaries that you may want
to do.
Thank you!
Dean C. Liddell.
© 2022 | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS PUBLICATION MAY NOT BE REPUBLISHED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR OF THE WORK.
-----------
DIVINE TRUTH – DIVINE TRUTH PTY LTD IS A REGISTARED AUSTRALIAN ORGANISATION AND IS THE OWNER OF COPYRIGHT FOR
ALL PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED AS WRITTEN BY A.J. MILLER AND MARY S. LUCK. DIVINE TRUTH PTY LTD IS IN CH ARGE OF
DIVINETRUTH.COM.
-----------
ANY QUESTIONS? PLEASE EMAIL THE AUTHOR AT DEANCLIDDELL96@HOTMAIL.COM REGARDING ANY REQUESTS, QUESTIONS,
OR RESPONSES TO THIS WORK/
-----------
SOCIAL MEDIA:
TWITTER/INSTAGRAM……… @DEANCLIDDELL
FACEBOOK……………………..@DEANCLIDDELL.MINISTRIES “DEAN C. LIDDELL”
2
CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2
About A.J. and Mary ......................................................................................................... 4
Alan John Miller ............................................................................................................ 4
His claims .................................................................................................................. 5
Mary s. Luck................................................................................................................ 14
Mary’s claims ........................................................................................................... 15
Divine Truth and its teachings ........................................................................................ 16
Divine Truth on Christianity and the Bible ................................................................... 19
Teachings on the return of JEsus ................................................................................. 23
Teaching on prayer ...................................................................................................... 25
God’s Laws and Sin ..................................................................................................... 28
Final Conculusions ......................................................................................................... 29
3
ABOUT A.J. AND MARY

INRODUCTION TO DIVINE TRUTH, ALAN JOHN MILLER AND MARY S. LUCK,
THEIR LIVES AND TEACHINGS.
ALAN JOHN MILLER
It was March 10th, 1963, and Maxine was in a hospital in Loxton, a city in the Australian
state of South Australia. A young baby boy was born, and Maxine, along with Alan, her
partner, named the child Alan John Miller. This young boy seemed like any other child, and
yet, in the new millennium, he would become a spiritual teacher, and would start to be
criticized about who he claimed to be and for what he taught. Before I get to who he claims
to be and what he teaches, lets look at his life before 2006.
This is Alan John Miller, as pictured in 2009, he is a person who

claims to be Jesus Christ returned. He was born, as stated
earlier, on the 10th of March, 1963, in Loxton, South Australia,
Australia. His parents were Maxine and Alan Miller. He is a father
to two children to a marriage that ended in 1997, and his children
are Tristan and Caleb Miller. It is unknown to me if he is a
grandfather or uncle to anyone. In the introduction to AJ, here is
how he has described his life:
“You will find out that I have always been passionate about having
a relationship with God. This relationship has defined my life to a
large degree, and has brought to a bliss that is impossible to
explain, since it is all based on intense emotions and feelings. (…)
A.J. Miller (2009) [source: as I progress, you will find that I will change. I am currently in error,
divinetruth.com] and you will see error leave me, through the same process that I am
describing to you that will help the error leave you if you so desire
it.” Yet, that is what he believes his life is about, he claims to be Jesus. Yes, the same Jesus
who billions of Christians pray in the name of and worship on Sundays for taking their sins
away, the same one that Muslims and Baha’is claim to be a prophet, and the one that many
people use as an expression when they are spooked. He claims that he “would not be surprised
if the emotional and spiritual process continues for a quite a few more years yet until I become
at-one with God. In the 1st century, a similar process took me 13 years from the time I
understood the process when I was 18 years old until I became at-one with God, during my
31st year. I have been engaging this process in an active manner since I remembered it in 2004,
a period of 8 years so far1.” [SOURCE: Introduction | Jesus and Mary | Jesus [divinetruth.com]]
According to Matt Siegal, of the Illawarra Mercury, A.J. was a former Computer systems
engineer, which he dropped out of school at age 16 to study at the local community college
in Regency Park; and property developer. His parents. Maxine and Alan, both being apart of
the Jehovah’s witnesses church, in the 1970s, they moved to the Adelaide Hills, and along
with his parents, practiced the teachings of the Watchtower organisation, and was very
forthcoming, only when doing sharing the message for the Jehovah’s Witnesses movement,
which Matt was told from a childhood friend of AJ, who wanted to be left anonymous. He
married his wife, an, at the time, 19-year-old, Sheree Newman, who he had met at church,
and before he was 21 years old, he became a pioneer, and then becoming a church elder in
1 As of 2012 | this was written in 2012, when A.J. was almost 50 years old.
4
Port Lincon, S.A., however, though having two sons,

the marriage ended in divorce and this was just after
he was 40 when had an revelation of who he was, and
started to live in accordance with who he now thinks
he is, that is Jesus Christ. Sheree rarely comments on
A.J., yet on the 4th of December 2019, Sheree was at
a protest of the Jehovah’s witnesses in Melbourne,
and met a youtuber, Goatlike Personality and spoke
about her relationship with A.J., how she is no longer
an active Jehovah’s Witness, but has faded. She
claimed in the video “Australian Jesus’ ex wife –
A.J.'s Ex wife, Sheree DuBois [left] and Sheree DuBois” that she was 18, and A.J. was 19,
Goatlike Personality [right] 4/12/2019
when they got married. (Sources: Cult Education
Institute | Illawarra Mercury | Goatlike Personality
YouTube).
HIS CLAIMS
Now, lets get into what exactly life was like for him, as Jesus, in the first century, and what
he claims now. As it has been referenced in many forms of online and the purpose of this
publication, A.J. claims to be the return of Jesus Christ. This section of the information about
Divine Truth and of A.J. Miller comes from three main sources, that is An introduction to my
life [read], Memories of my young childhood in the 1st century [read], and Relationships with
parents, family and friends [read] written by A.J. Miller on the 11th and 13th February 2006,
and is available at the Downloads > 2007 events and earlier. [LINK]
In the first biographical publication from 2006, titled ‘An Introduction to my life’, A.J. starts
with a bit of news. That he wants you to know that he has been “thinking about a wide variety
of subjects over the past few months, most of which revolve around the progression of the 14
persons who have reincarnated, and those others of you who have shown faith and are
progressing as a result of that faith.” and explains that “the 14 who have returned to earth are
progressing through transitions that are required for us to be able to begin the work ahead.”
“usually at the time of their living in the seventh sphere of the Spiritual Heavens, they have a
time of reflection about their life up till that point” “I expect that the final emotions and feelings
in disharmony with my Father will disappear shortly due to the operation of His Love and my
own desire to work through them. Like all persons in this progression, I do not know what I
have yet to deal with, and so I cannot accurately estimate how long this process will take me.
After that time I will be waiting for my Father to complete the process of transition so that I will
be ready for the time of my public ministry, which I believe will begin this year. 2”
The 14 I will touch on in a later part of this publication, but it is an important detail to
remember for the Divine Truth movement. A.J. and Mary are two of the 14 people who have
said to have returned after reflection of their lives and purpose in the Seventh Sphere of the
Spiritual Heavens. This publication then continues in what is the purpose of writing not only
this publication, but the next two we are looking at, for he writes:
“I would like to talk about how I dealt with rejection from my family and the derision of others,
disagreements with my Father, my times alone. Also the occasional times of sadness, and the
effect my Father’s Love had upon me during those times before I was at-one with Him. I want
to also mention some aspects of my ministry that have not been discussed, when I met my soul
mate, my relationship with her, her pregnancy, and response of my disciples about some
2 A.J. is referencing the year 2006
5
matters and issues, and some details about my last day of life on earth then. I would also like
to talk about some of my feelings and emotions after I passed over to spirit, assisting my
disciples to have faith, the time of Pentecost, my work in assisting spirits to progress and my
own progress. Although I cannot remember at this time dates and times, I was present at the
time of death of most of my close friends, and also my soul mate and my daughter.” That is
right, in talking about his first century life, that he was present for the death of most of his
close friends, his soul mate and his daughter. He, if he is truly the biblical Jesus, is claiming
he had an equal other than The father has the Bible had recorded Christ saying that ‘I and
the father are one’3 as a soul mate and that he also had at least a daughter. He continues in
saying “I am going to mention many things about life as a sinful man in modern times, from the
time of my reincarnation onwards.” As Christians, those who follow the Jesus of the bible, we
believe that Jesus was a man without sin, and yet bore our sin on the cross, essentially
becoming sin, so that we may be set free. However, A.J. is saying, even in his current time as
Jesus he is still a sinful man. This may be an honest statement about A.J. that he is a sinful
man in modern times, but if Christ knew no sin, perfect in always and resisted all
temptations, as taught in the Holy Bible, and A.J. is Christ, then it would mean that he has
made The Word who was with God and was God, nothing but a man. Which according to
scripture, he would be made a false Christ.
“Since I cannot back up much of this information with corroborative evidence, some of you may
have difficulty accepting it. Others may feel that my feelings and emotions are imagined rather
than real. You are entitled to your opinions and disbelief, and I am not hurt if you cannot accept
the things I will write. You always have the option of asking your spirit guides and your Father
for their confirmation to assist you.” A.J. writes, proclaiming essentially that even if he was
truly who he said he was, that he would not be able to provide much evidence to prove it to
us, an uses a very similar line to what the Latter-day Saint missionaries use “ask your Father
[in heaven] for […] confirmation”. He continues to give the ultimate main reason to write this
stuff, to him he says that “My reason for this has been that there is far too much emphasis
placed upon my person, not only by ‘orthodox’ Christians, but also by others including those
who have come to experience Divine Love, and I felt providing more information may just
exacerbate the problem of my being glorified in a totally unnecessary and often times
blasphemous manner.” “Since now I am on earth, in the flesh, in time it will be much easier for
others to see me as they see themselves, and I have the opportunity of negating much of the
previously untruthful history and misconceptions of myself and my life, and I also have the
opportunity of placing the focus back to where it began, and where it always should have been,
on each person obtaining a personal relationship with their Heavenly Father by being Born
Again into His Love.”
In basic terms, A.J. has claimed to have came back to setting the untruthful history and
misconceptions, about his life and his person, back to a right understanding, and give the
truth about who he, being Jesus, really is. The wrong ideas that he wants to fix, is the
teachings of Christianity, and also those who have come to experience Divine Love, which I
would assume mean the Islamic, Baha’i, and other religious groups who have a teaching on
Jesus Christ that is contrary to how A.J. thinks Jesus is. This is highly concerning to me,
and should be to you if you’re a Christian, because many people who follow everything that
he has taught. Now are being taught pseudo-historical teachings, and evil teachings against
the historical Christ and teachings of the Holy Bible. He claims that his first desire is “to be
ever closer to my Father, and to come to know the person my God truly is.” And that “The
second is that I can prove true to my own selection and be his messenger of Divine Truth
assisting all individuals to come to experience the complete joy and happiness that results from
3 The Gospel of John, Chapter 10, verses 25-38
6
truly coming to understand their own Father, and beginning on the journey, the everlasting
journey of getting to know Him.”
In his second biographical writing of the first century, A.J. is talking about his childhood in
the first century. He opens on the creation of humanity, by claiming the following, “Our
Heavenly Father created us both as one-half of one complete soul, each of these souls being
unique in potentiality and, once incarnated, in individuality. As such you and I are really
brothers and sisters of the same Parent. And since our Parent is Good, and Loves us with His
Complete Soul, He is not partial towards any of His Children, and gives His Love as each of
them ask for It. But our Creator had to choose one of those souls to become the first human
couple, and so he chose Amon and Aman, and they became our first parents, now widely known
as Adam and Eve. When Amon and Amon sinned against the Holy Spirit, thus preventing the
Divine Love from coming into their soul and transforming them into a Divine child of the Father,
they also conferred upon the human race the legacy of disharmony with God, which is pain
and suffering, and potentially ever greater disharmony. The decision made by Amon and Aman
also raised a question which until my coming was not answered, and that is; “Would a person
who is a perfect man as the first human couple were created be able to take the opportunity
that they refused and be able to become at-one with God in His Love while living on earth?”
You see, something you may have not considered is this; there were already many spirits in
the spiritual heavens that were in the condition of the perfect natural man, living in the 6th
sphere of the spiritual kingdom..” Taking notes from the originally from the Fall of Man account
when Adam and Eve first sinned, and death entered the world, but changing it. He claims
that Adam and Eve’s sin prevented Divine Love to come to them, and refused the path, and
to become at-one with, God and his plan.
On the Birth of his first century life, he claims that indeed, his birth “was foretold by the
prophets of the Hebrews, and many other mediums from different nationalities other than
decedents of Abraham, and my Heavenly Father conferred upon me His Holy Spirit to the extent
required for me to become born without sin, that is, without the causes of sin that result from
the emotional and imperfect physical impressions of ancestors who lived in sin. I was not
conceived with Holy Spirit at the time of my conception, since I was conceived in the way a
person is normally conceived, shortly after my parents Mary and Joseph were married.”
Essentially, he claims that Christ, was foretold of the prophets, mediums who were not from
Abraham, and that he wasn’t conceived miraculously, but rather naturally, and the Holy
Spirit allowed him to be born without the causes of sin, that would have made his life difficult
for him to be who he was at his first birth. He also claims that “my Heavenly Father removed
all causes of sin from me, and that is the only difference between myself and yourself, and the
only time our Father shall ever need to do such a thing, that is, remove the causes of sin from
a child just born.” Meaning he was without sin and knew not sin, except that of other people.
“But of course, I was unaware of this fact until much later, and if it had not been for the visit
by the three wise men, astrologers, even my parents would not even have had a mental
awareness of the possibility of my being the Messiah.”
On his childhood in the first century, he states that “Like most children, my earliest memories
are feelings and emotions only. Feeling loved and cherished by my mother Mary. Feeling her
own feelings of fear and sadness leaving her home to travel. The urgency in my father Joseph
in his hurry to have us leave Bethlehem. I doubt if I will ever have memories of these events,
since they are just the impression of emotions that all children, even those in the womb, feel
from their parents at different times.” Which we, as Christians, know the reason behind the
need to leave Bethlehem is because Herold wanted all the babies at that time, dead. We all
know this from the Christmas time. Growing up in Egypt, he reflected that “I was happy
almost all of the time, and the only time I was not was [sic] when others emotions of anger,
7
sadness, envy or other such emotions would stream from them, and I could feel their energy
and would cry in confusion. I was very gentle, and even at a young age I can remember my
father Joseph’s concern about the person I seemed to be. When I was old enough to understand
what it meant to have people talk about me, I would hear my father stating his concern to my
mother, about my sensitive nature, my gentle spirit, my talking to this imaginary friend, the
laughter of his friends when they came to visit about these things, and so forth. My mother
Mary would quiet him as well she could, and said I would grow up and no longer do these
things. Because of the laughter and derision of others, in a short time I learned to speak to my
‘friend’ in silence, since doing it openly seemed to bother them.” He claimed that he was
confused about the situation as he claimed that “I often thought that everyone must feel as I
do, and it wasn’t until I was around 7 years old that I realized very few people seemed to feel
the same, and I could not understand why that was the case.”
On his relationship with Mary and Joseph, he claims the following things in the same writing.
On Joseph he said “I knew my father felt I was the Messiah, but since I did not feel it, the
thought of being a Messiah rarely crossed my mind except in a discussion my father instigated.”
And that Joseph, “noticing that I was reticent to fight and defend myself was very concerned,
and, although he still believed I was the Messiah who would liberate the Jews from oppression,
he was very concerned about how I would learn to be a king when I did not have the stomach
for fighting.”
On reflecting about the wisemen, who visited the young family, in the Bible, which all people
hear at Christmas time, A.J., claims to recall the following about what Joseph thought. He
writes in Relationships With Parents, Family & Friends, “the visit of the ‘wise men’ cause him
to ponder about the potentiality of my being the Messiah that had been prophesied. He
reasoned that these events provided some proof that I was the promised Messiah. He then
studied the scriptures carefully to examine what other prophecies may indicate I was the
promised one.” He recalls that Joseph came to believe while Jesus was very young, and that
he was the one that God had chosen to be the Messiah. Joseph had some study looked at
what kind of person the messiah would turn out to be. Joseph, as A.J. puts it, thought that
the messiah, and Jesus, “would be the political solution to the Roman oppression. This, of
course, was a common belief, that the dynasty of David would be re-established and the
Messiah would lead the Jewish people away from the oppression of the gentiles.” A.J. recalls
that Joseph taught him (as Jesus) all different parts of the Scriptures and attempting to place
the idea of messiahship and what was required for the messiah in his head, including when
they were working together.
He recalls that he “loved the spiritual discussions, but could never warm to an idea of Jehovah
being a God just of the Jews only” yet he had troubles to see himself “as a political leader, a
King, leading others against oppression of the nations.” He claims that Joseph put him into a
military school, he claims that Joseph “felt that I needed to be toughened up, and so he sent
me to a school which was operated by ex-military types, ex members of the Roman and other
armies. They taught us everything relating to war and violence, and we began to study the art
of killing” and A.J. claims that he didn’t last very long at the school, that there was rape and
molestation of women, and even of the female children that were born of the rapes. It is
reported by A.J. that this was a common thing for the students to be encouraged in doing,
even as young as seven years of age. A.J. claims that even to this day, assuming he’s referring
to the 13th of February, 2006, that he still feels guilty about not trying to stop the rapes, and
for not trying to retrieve them for that situation.
On his relationship with Mary, his mother in the first century, he claims that “I would talk
about my feelings with my mother at times, asking her how she felt about everything, because
8
I was interested in knowing how people other than myself feel, and then I would attempt to tell
her how I felt. Of course, she thought she understood, but could not really understand, but she
loved my gentle spirit and my sensitivity, and how I wanted to help make her life easier with
having 5 children, and being pregnant with the sixth. She did not think that I was any different
to any other child aside from my sensitivity and my desire to here about things related to God,
and although I could see that I did not have the same loves as other children, I did not consider
myself in any way unique or special, I just followed my heart in what I wanted to do, and most
of the time my parents allowed me to do that.” And in addition to that, A.J. reports that Mary
“wanted to just let me be a child, since to her, although I was sensitive and gentle, I know she
felt my nature to be good, and she was proud of me without completely understanding why I
was like I was.”
During the time when Joseph had Jesus in that soldiers school, A.J. claims that Mary was
“very anxious to return to her home, since she missed her family so much” and that she “had
been without them for such a long time during a time when a new mother really needed a
family” due to her now having 8 children under 10, including Jesus. Claiming that her life
was very difficult, and that was due to not only there being no family around to assist her at
the time, but also due to the ceremonious cleansing laws of the Law of Moses. She became
vert insistent that they would move back home. He claims that his mother Mary, was very
much like Proverbs 27:15, referencing that a quarrelsome wife is like the dripping of a leaking
roof in a rainstorm, he claims that this would be what led to the formation of the parables of
the persistent widow, and the parable of the pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:1-8.
Regarding to the return to Galilee, he recorded that he and his family returned to Galilee,
eventually Nazareth, a he travelled home via the sea, and he finally noticed why he called the
why the prophets referred to the ‘Sea of Mankind’. He recalls that he was an parent’s
nightmare asking the typical ‘why’ questions. He claims that he, “would use quite a number
of illustrations referring to these things, but none of them found their way into the current
Biblical writings. My brother James did refer to one of these illustrations though, when he
mentioned in James 1:6 a comparison of a person who doubts and lacking faith being like a
wave of the sea driven about by the wind.” He would often feel the forces of creation, the
power of God, and that these came to be due to God’s soul. He said that he would reflect on
that if God was a god of wrath, as many believed then and do now, he thought that if God
was ever angry, nothing could withstand it, nor anyone could do so. Yet it confirmed more
within him, that God was the God of Love, and he believes that there was no such thing as
God’s divine wrath or anger.
He claims that he “could see that many men wanted God to be angry, so that they could rely
on Him to express their own anger towards those they condemned. If God got angry, then it
was also fine for men to be angry, since anger, and its subsequent violence could then be
justified.” He claims that God did not get angry, therefore, violence could not be justified, and
any sort of violence done by a person was done so “out of emotions that were in disharmony
with God. If a person could remove those emotions in disharmony with God from themselves,
then they would no longer feel the desire to be angry”.
On how he claims to know all of these above things to be true, and why he claims to be did a
series of Q&A videos about how and why he identifies as Jesus. The page is Frequently Asked
Questions; Jesus’ Identity., here is what he has to say: “Yes that’s exactly what I am claiming,
that I am Jesus from the first century, that I’ve had a single life, a life that began in the first
century … but the reality is that I have had a life that entire time so I don’t claim that I’m the
reincarnation of somebody who has existed 2,000 years ago ‒ but rather somebody who has
9
existed for 2,000 years4” “I know in exactly the same way that anybody would know that they
are the person they claim to be, and that is that you have a series of memories that describe
your entire life from the time shortly after you were born until your present time and for me it’s
the exactly the same thing. I have a series of memories, it’s just a longer series of memories
than the average person has in that it goes on for a 2,000 year period, and I remember from
the time shortly after my birth in the first century right through until today. And so for me the
way I know I am Jesus is that I have a memory of that entire life. For anybody else looking at
me, well that’s different because they don’t know what I remember, and most people have
never questioned me about what I remember. Of course if you were looking from an observer's
perspective, it’s a very different way of analysing whether I am Jesus or not, but from my
perspective I can remember my life and so I know who I am 5”
“I am definitely not claiming nor have I ever claimed that I am God. There are many statements
that are made in the Bible that would tend to indicate that I might have made that claim at
some point in the past but that is not the case at all. I have never claimed that I am God and I
will never claim that I am God and I will never be God. I am just a normal human being in the
same way that everybody else is a normal human being. I was born in exactly the same
manner, I was conceived in exactly the same manner, and I am exactly the same kind of person
as any other person who has ever lived on this planet. The only difference in my first century
life was that I found a way to become at-one with God, through a process that I discovered with
God. And that’s what I am teaching, this same process of how to become at-one with God. But
once you become at-one with God it does not ever mean that you are God. You are a separate
entity to God and you become even more individualised when you become at-one with God.6”
“Well there’s two ways in which we are a son or daughter of God. The first way is that by
creation we are a son or daughter of God. And what I mean by that is that every single person
who has ever been created is created as a soul. In fact each person who has ever appeared on
this earth makes up half of a soul, and each half of a soul is joined to the other half of itself
and that particular soul is a son or daughter of God, by nature of its own creation. But when I
referred to myself as a son of God in the first century I was not referring to that, I was referring
to a process that a person goes through where you become born again and this born again
process causes you to become different to the natural human that you currently are. It turns
you into a person who’s now got God’s Divine Nature within you. When I say God's Divine
Nature I mean God's Divine Love has entered the person to the point where the person has
exactly the same viewpoints of love as God has and I called that being born again.”7
“I’m not claiming that I am the only son of God. However in the first century there was a time
when I was the only true son of God in the sense that I was teaching. If I could illustrate that:
In the first century I taught that every single person was a child of God, in other words that
every single person has been created by God. And their soul, which is the true individual, not
their physical body or the spirit body but rather their soul, was God’s creation, and so therefore
every single person who has ever existed on this planet is a son or a daughter of God. Even if
we deny that, we are still a son or daughter of God.”8
4 Jesus Identity Session 1, Question 1 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-

000212l1-Is%20AJ%20Miller%20claiming%20he%20is%20Jesus%20from%20the%20Bible--en-cliptranscript.pdf
000257l1-How%20does%20AJ%20Miller%20know%20he%20is%20Jesus--en-cliptranscript.pdf
000400l1-Is%20Jesus%20(AJ%20Miller)%20claiming%20that%20he%20is%20God--en-cliptranscript.pdf
000637l1-What%20does%20it%20mean%20to%20be%20a%20child%20of%20God--en-cliptranscript.pdf
000917l1-Is%20Jesus%20(AJ%20Miller)%20claiming%20he%20is%20the%20only%20Son%20of%20God--en-cliptranscript.pdf
10
“The reason I say that I am Jesus is that I am just being honest with you. I feel that if I withheld
my identity from people, then I would be dishonest and what I would find is that sooner or later
they would ask me who I am. And I would say I am Jesus and then they would have to go
through exactly the same processes of accusing me of all the same things that they are accusing
me of now, if I didn’t state it upfront. In addition to that they could claim that I had been false
or deceitful with them at the start and I have no desire to be false or deceitful with people. …
But I am still going to state exactly who I am when I am asked; I do not avoid any question,
including the question “Who are you”? (smiles). So, I am Jesus and I am stating that
categorically. However it is not important to me whether a person believes me or not”9
“In fact it’s necessary to not worship me for any reason. I am just a normal person just as any
other person including yourself is a normal person. I do not encourage anybody to worship
another person, ever. The problem with worshipping another person is that we put the person
in place of God and this is what has been done with me for 2,000 years. And to be honest, I do
not like this at all; in fact it is one of the reasons why I have decided to return, to correct these
teachings that I should be worshipped. I am not God, I will never be God and I should never be
worshipped. … There is no need for a person to have a relationship with me in order to have a
relationship with God and there is no need for a person to go through me in order to have a
relationship with God”10
“I don’t know of any so-called followers who worship me; I don’t even know if I’ve got any
followers A person who follows me I would say would be a person who follows my teachings,
not follows me. I don’t believe any man should be followed or any woman should be followed.
I believe that if a person’s teachings are teachings based around love and truth, then they
should certainly be listened to. And if it is determined that they are definitely loving and truthful
there should certainly be an attempt to follow them if we're going to have some kind of happy,
successful and beautiful life.”11
On if it is possible that A.J. could be channelling a spirit that claims to be Jesus, he said “It
is certainly possible. There is no doubt it's possible. The question "Is it likely?" would then have
to be asked”, A.J. continues to say “But of course a person will have to ask themselves this
question, as to whether I am being influenced by a spirit.” and then said “I know that I’m not
being influenced by a spirit who claims to be Jesus or who is Jesus himself”12 A.J. claims these
things that to be true. However, to be claiming to be Jesus, and be open to the idea of the
spirit possession, or spirit influence, being a good thing is shocking, as we read in The Gospel
of Matthew, we read that Jesus, using the “Son of Man” title say that He’d return as the
lightning comes out of the east, and shines to the west, the eagles will be gathered together,
there’ll be a sign in heaven and all the earth shall mourn and they’ll see Him coming in the
clouds with power and great glory. There shall be a great trumpet sound, and He will gather
His elect. 13
On Spirit influence and possession, it is written that the apostles of Christ were given power
to cast out demons14, Jesus Himself cleansed a man of spirits that was not his own, and sent
them to pigs15, and that you may need to pray and fast for any spirit to leave 16. For A.J., and

001228l1-Why%20does%20AJ%20Miller%20have%20to%20say%20he%20is%20Jesus--en-cliptranscript.pdf
001508l1-Does%20Jesus%20(AJ%20Miller)%20expect%20to%20be%20worshipped--en-cliptranscript.pdf
001729l1-Do%20Jesus'%20(AJ%20Miller's)%20followers%20worship%20him--en-cliptranscript.pdf
002204l1-Is%20AJ%20Miller's%20claim%20he%20is%20Jesus%20spirit%20influenced--en-cliptranscript.pdf
13 The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 24, Verses 24 to 31
14 The Gospel of Mark, Chapter 3, verse 15
15 The Gospel of Mark, Chapter 5, verses 1 to 16
16 The Gospel of Mark, Chapter 9, verses 17 to 29
11
his partner Mary, they practice mediumship, which is allowing a spirit to speak through and
to use you to get their message across. They have taken this mediumship up, which goes
against the Jewish scriptures, in the Law, it says that if anyone is found uses divination,
observer of the times, enchanter, a witch or wizard, a charmer, or counsulter familiar with
spirits or necromancer, we should drive them out, as these things are an abominations
according to God’s laws17, God shall turn His face away from the person who have became
familiar to spirits, wizards and whoring after them 18. Even in the New Testament, Paul, who
was someone who had an after-resurrection, became an apostle of The Lord Jesus Christ,
and had met with the original apostles, rebuked a person’s spirit who practiced divination.
These things that A.J. is claiming is very much unaligned with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
A.J. Miller claims that he is currently expected to perform miracles and that is a false
assumption that he actually did any miracles, saying “God performed miracles through me by
connecting with the individuals through myself and then using some of the energy that I had in
me to heal the person; God did that through me. I didn’t actually heal anybody at all.” Yet, in
the same response to the question of “You claim that you are Jesus. Why are you not currently
performing miracles?” A.J. responses “Secondly I was not able to heal anybody in the first
century until I became at-one with God.” Either he couldn’t heal anyone except through God,
or he could once he became at-one with God. He says that “Once I become at-one with God,
assuming that I ever do, I will be able to heal again”19, yet we read that The Word (which is
Jesus) was in the Beginning, was with and was God, not a single thing was made without
him, through him all things were made. In Him is life and light20. Meaning, Jesus was always
at one with God, from eternity past to eternity future. If A.J. wants to become at-one with
God, he would have to have faith in the biblical Jesus, rather than claim that he is Jesus.
On rather or not there is proof for A.J. being Jesus, he says the following “Well I feel this
question is very much based around what a person accepts as evidence. For some people, I
don’t believe that they'll accept anything other than me levitating or moving matter with my
mind or some other fanciful thing before they’ll accept that I am Jesus. I believe that once I do
those particular things many of them might even automatically think that I might be Jesus, but
they still won’t accept that I am Jesus, so I can’t see how doing those particular things will
prove anything in the long run.21” However, when we, as Christians, look for proof that we
have Jesus returned to earth, we look at if what Jesus said in the bible, matches with how
this person came to us, and to the world. If Jesus came the same as he ascended22, came
with angels, all the nations brought together in His presence, separate all people as a Shepard
separates sheep and goats23, a darken sun, the moon will not reflect the sun, the stars have
fallen from the sky, there will be deep mourning, and Christ would return in the clouds of
heaven with power and glory24,25,26.
A.J. claims that the only thing anyone needs as evidence that he is Jesus returned is “accept
the evidence of love that I display and the number of truths that I transmit and give to people
and very clear and concise explanations that I’ve given about my history, the memories that I
have of my life, then they would have a large body of evidence already to prove to them whether
I am Jesus or not. It’s just whether those people accept it or not.” Yet continues to say “And for
17 Deuteronomy, chapter 18, verses 10 to 12

18 Leviticus, chapter 20, verse 6
19 Jesus’ Identity, Session 1, Question 11 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-
002734l1-If%20AJ%20Miller%20was%20Jesus%20surely%20he%20would%20be%20performing%20miracles--en-cliptranscript.pdf
20 The Gospel of John, Chapter 1, verses 1-5
21 Jesus’ Identity, Session 1, Question 15 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-
003906l1-Is%20there%20any%20evidence%20to%20demonstrate%20AJ%20Miller%20is%20Jesus--en-cliptranscript.pdf
22 Acts of the Apostles (Acts), Chapter 1, verses 6-11
23 The Gospel of Matthew, chapter 25, verses 31-46
24 The Gospel of Matthew, chapter 25, verses 29-41
25 The Gospel of Mark, chapter 13, verses, 24-33
26 The Gospel of Luke, chapter 17. Verses 20-37
12
the majority of people they find it very, very difficult to accept. The main reasons why the
majority of people find it difficult to accept is that they have a huge number of beliefs or pre-
conceptions about what they believe Jesus to be. They don’t believe Jesus to be a man, they
believe Jesus to be some kind of God-man. That’s not true but that’s what they believe and so
if I continue to be a man those particular people will never accept that I am Jesus. 27”
To deny who Jesus of the bible is, is to deny truth, which he claims to be preaching. To deny
the power of the Holy Ghost, and to claim to be Jesus, and yet to change who Jesus is, I
consider personally, to be blasphemy against The Holy Spirit, which is the unforgivable sin,
as taught by Jesus Christ in the Holy and Sacred scriptures, for Christ has said “All sin and
blasphemy can be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven.
This is a sin with eternal consequences.” And I trust and believe that the Holy Scripture has
been kept and recorded since the original writings have been done, over the claims of someone
who doesn’t match the prophecies by the person he is claiming to be.
Now, for those whom are followers of A.J., if A.J. is Jesus, would he lie? Would he not tell the
truth about how he’d return? Do you think, with all the biblical scholarship and records of
how the bible came down to us today from the first century, where even people who have
nothing to lose nor win if Jesus was who he claimed to be in the Biblical writings or what A.J.
claims Jesus in the first century was and who he claims to be today, say the exact same thing
that the bible, especially the New Testament, did as the originals did, that A.J. is telling the
truth of who Jesus is? He spreads the conspiracy that the Nicaean Councils, and other
councils, were made to change what was truth, with the Council of Nicaea beginning the
“erosion of the Biblical Cannon, something that began in support of the Nicaean Council’s edicts,
and proceeded over many centuries of time. But, by the time of the Councils of Carthage in
397AD, there was general support for the Bible cannon as proposed by the Bibles that were
produced during the time of Constantine.28”
However this type of conspiracy has been disproven many times, by the likes of Dr. John
Meade29 30, who is a respected researcher in the field; Robert Baral, in his paper “On the
formation of the New Testament Bible Cannon”31, written in October 2004, writes “As history
records in the Nicene Creed, the overwhelming vote of the Bishops was that JESUS was of the
same substance as GOD the Father and thus equal. Athanasius emerged from this
confrontation as the hero of the Council of Nicea, having successfully led the early Church to
reject Arianism.” 32 In addition, he writes that the council was to “clarify The Person and
natures of JESUS CHRIST. At issue was whether JESUS was of the same substance as GOD
The Father” and on the claims of the bible, he writes that the only evidence of any set list that
became standard was in 367, as there were many apocryphal, and heretical writings spread
around, saying “Bishop Athanasius in Egypt sent out an Easter letter of encouragement to the
Churches under his authority. His letter spells out a clear New Testament canon identical to
that of Eusebius’ New Testament list, which were the prevailing accepted Christian Scriptures
at the time in most Christian Churches. This is the final form of the New Testament canon that
the Christian Bible uses to this day.” Athanasius writes, “I have thought it good to clearly
identify what books have been received by us through tradition as belonging to The Canon, and
27 Jesus’ Identity, Session 1, question 15 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-

003906l1-Is%20there%20any%20evidence%20to%20demonstrate%20AJ%20Miller%20is%20Jesus--en-cliptranscript.pdf
28 “Does AJ hold to the teachings contained within the Bible Gospel accounts?” A.J. Miller, 10 th of August, 2011.
https://divinetruth.com/docts/2011/20110810-1900-1900-jesus-dt-res-hbrchr--
To%20Does%20AJ%20agree%20with%20teachings%20contained%20in%20Bible%20Gospel%20accounts--en-letter.pdf
29 “The Council of Nicaea and Biblical Canon” – Dr. John Meade, Phoenix Seminary -https://ps.edu/council-nicaea-biblical-canon/
30 “Did Nicaea Really Create the Bible?” – Dr. John Meade, Text And Cannon Institute, Phoenix Institute
https://textandcanon.org/the-council-of-nicea-and-the-biblical-canon/
31 “On the formation of the New Testament Bible Cannon” – Robert Baral, 24th of October, 2004,
https://robertbaral.com/pdf/NTpFormBibleCanon.pdf
32 “On the Formation of The New Testament Bible Cannon”, pg 14
13
which we believe to be Divine. These are the fountains of salvation, that they who thirst may
be satisfied with the living words they contain. In these alone is proclaimed the doctrine of
godliness”33 This list that we have from Athanasius, doesn’t mean that Nicaea or any other
council created, changed nor manipulated the doctrines of the faith according to scriptures,
nor the original writings of the scriptures by the people who knew and followed Jesus who
were there at the time of His life, or after He ascended into Heaven.
MARY S. LUCK
Mary S. Luck, the partner of Alan John Miller, claims to be

Mary Magdalene. Born on the 2nd of January, 1979, she
started to follow Jesus back in 2007, around the time when
A.J. started to full teach Divine Truth and came out as Jesus
Christ. They started seeing each other in 2009. 34 She
practices mediumship, which was mentioned previously,
and claims to have started doing such a practice near
Maleny, Queensland Australia at a friends house when
spirits visited her while she was sleeping. 35 Mary claims that
“Speaking to my guides is now a daily practice” 36 Mary,
describing how they live on her blog “Notes Along The Way”,
claims that “Many people have a lot of misunderstandings
about Divine Truth and about Jesus and I” and that “it also
comes about as a sad “hang over” that many people have as
a result of being harmed, or knowing people who have been
harmed, either by members of organized religions or by people
in charge of so called “spiritual movements” in the past.” Also
saying that “the first thing I can clear up is to say that Jesus and I aren’t starting a religion or
cult. We believe that what we teach is God’s Truth which we have learned from personal
experience”37. However, these claims can be said by also anyone in charged by organized
religions or spiritual movements from Raelism, the Latter-day Saint movements, Jehovah’s
Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventism, any Christian denomination, Islamic sect, the Baha’i
faith or any movement or religion you can think of. Now Mary, along with A.J. could have
good intentions, don’t want to deceive people, and truly believe that they are telling the truth
about their journey about how they connect to God, and their way of life. Yet, they are
teaching, as Mary puts it, “What we teach is a way of life. That is, the Way that we can form
a close relationship with God and grow in Love and Truth. This Way can be implemented in
any location and at any or all times.” Which means that they believe that they are teaching
how everyone can come to God.
On her blog’s about page, and the about page on Divinetruth.com, there’s not a lot written
about her, nor her claims to be Mary Magdalene. However, she did do a session of questions
in 2013 where she answers questions about her claims 38. So lets look at what she claims to
be her first century and current life.
33 “On the Formation of The New Testament Bible Cannon”, pg 15

34 Divine Truth Website, “Introduction to Divine Truth Teachings: What Wikipedia Could Say”
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-teach-wikipedia.htm
35 Divine Truth Website, “Introduction to Jesus and Mary: About Mary” – Mary’s Mediumship
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-us-mary.htm
36 Divine Truth Website, “Introduction to Jesus and Mary: About Mary” – Mary's Comments About Channeling
37 Mary Luck, Notes Along The Way [blog], How We Live https://mary.divinetruth.com/how-we-live/
38 Divine Truth Website, Questions: Mary’s Identity https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#faq-maryidentity.htm
14
MARY’S CLAIMS
Regarding if she is or isn’t claiming to be Magdalene, she states “Yes, I am Mary Magdalene.
I am saying that publicly and I have been for a number of years.” And “I’ve been Mary
Magdalene for a lot longer than I’ve been known as Mary Luck.” 39 On when did she first
consider herself to be Magdalene, she didn’t give an right out answer on when, but from page
3 of the transcript to the question, she said “I think it was New Year’s Eve or just before.”, as
previously stated, they met in 2007, so assuming around New year’s 2007. “So I found myself
at a couple of talks that AJ gave in my parents’ home over the next couple of weeks and I was
quite interested in what he had to say but I didn’t really think that he needed to be telling
people that he was Jesus” 40
In her response to the question, ‘how do you know you are Mary Magdalene?’, she responds
saying, “I’ve often wandered around trying to convince myself that I don’t know that I am, that
it’s still in question inside of me, that I have to sort it out and figure it out, but the truth is that
I know that I am. The reason that I’ve been in that state for such a long time, of wanting to
question it and wanting to doubt what I already feel inside of myself, is largely that the world
views me saying that and me living that.” She also claims that “a lot of people think that my
sanity is in question really” because “they think that I’m in a cult and that I’m somehow being
hypnotised or mind-controlled or something weird is going on with me where I’m not in control
of myself” and “also because a large number of people on the planet are Christians and they
have a lot of ideas about who Jesus should be and who I am. The fact that my saying that I’m
Mary Magdalene and I’m the wife of Jesus and, “Jesus actually didn’t die to save your sins,
and a lot of what you believe to be Christian truth is not actually truth”41. Here we see that she
honestly believe that Christianity, its message and everything to do with Christianity is false.
39 Mary’s Identity, session 1, question 1. https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130902-1300-1300-marym-dt-int-14jmel-

000058l1-Is%20Mary%20Luck%20claiming%20she%20is%20Mary%20Magdalene%20from%20the%20Bible--en-cliptranscript.pdf
40 Mary’s Identity, session 1, question 2 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130902-1300-1300-marym-dt-int-14jmel-
000301l1-When%20did%20Mary%20Luck%20first%20consider%20that%20she%20is%20Mary%20Magdalene--en-
cliptranscript.pdf
41 Mary’s Identity, session 1, question 3. https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130902-1300-1300-marym-dt-int-14jmel-
002034l1-How%20does%20Mary%20Luck%20know%20that%20she%20is%20Mary%20Magdalene--en-cliptranscript.pdf
15
DIVINE TRUTH AND ITS TEACHINGS

A.J., and Mary, on there website have provided a page where people can come and look at a
simple glance, what the teachings of Divine Truth are. Here, I am not going to defend them,
yet I am going to share simply what they wrote on this page, and in the questions section.
However, like the introduction to this publication said, ‘This publication’s main sources are
available on the official website of Divine Truth’ and ‘as I personally see it as a wise thing to
do to use the original sources of the organisation to talk about the teachings thereof.’42
Divine Truth claims it is the “Absolute Scientific Truth of the Universe as known by God. It
has existed as long as God has, and continues to exist whether humankind discovers it, or
attempts to ignore it, as we often do.” Regarding its discovery, they write that “In the first
century, a man was born who wanted to discover God's Truth. His parents were Joseph and
Mary of Nazareth, and he was named by them Jesus … Jesus was taught by his parents and
his educators in Judaism to believe in a wrathful and vengeful God. But he personally felt that
God must be better than any human, and in particular, more developed in Love than any
human. […] Jesus engaged a scientific experimentation process in order to discover what God's
method for communicating with His children was. He named this yet undiscovered method "The
Way", the only way in which a human could communicate with, and receive Love and Truth
from God. […] Jesus knew that any experiment he would develop to find "The Way" needed to
be able to be engaged by a young child. It would need to be simple, and that God, if God loved,
would have created a way that was natural for a child to develop, if allowed by its environment
and parents to do so. He spent a lot of time with children, noticing them, and examining how
they interacted with each other without parental influence. […] The experiment was prayer.”43
Regarding God, they teach that, God exists, and does so outside of and independent to the
universe, is an entity and is the “Supreme Oversoul” of the universe. Which, a lot of
monotheistic belief systems teach in essence. They also believe that God has personal
characteristics and attributes, they appear infinite to humanity, and logically are likely
infinite as it can’t be defined. God’s supreme attribute is love, and is perfect therein, and his
other attributes include, knowledge wisdom, power, justice and has supreme logic. God is
omniscient and omnipotent. They also claim that God “has masculine and feminine
characteristics and attributes, is perfect in sexual attributes, and can be said to be both Mother
and Father”
On God’s relation to humanity, they claim that God created each human, their soul, and
desires a loving personal relationship with her children. God has made laws which make a
personal relationship possible with God, and that God knows and wants to be known by all
humans. They claim that God doesn’t eternally punish any child, but has made possible the
redemption of all humans. God can communicate to each one of us through soul-based
commination, and that’s how we can do the same, essentially, based on what you feel in your
soul. They also claim that God is not the universe itself, that Jesus is not a part of God,
incapable of making any mistake, not angry or wrathful, not punishing even if someone
brakes God’s laws.44
The Divine Truth organisation claims that God’s truth is infinite, and cannot be contained in
any material or being, including a single book or a single person. Which essentially means,
that they don’t think that the biblical record is the full message preserved from God for
42 “Divine Truth & The Return of Jesus”, Dean C. Liddell, introduction, pg. 2
43 Divine Truth website, Introduction to Divine Truth Teachings, about The Discovery of Divine Truth
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-teach.htm
44 Divine Truth website, Introduction to Divine Truth teachings, about God’s creation
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-teach-god.htm
16
humanity, and implies that they view Christians worships and thinks that everything within
the biblical record is all we need to know about God’s Truth, yet we know that not everything
was written down about Christ, because there wouldn’t be enough paper to write the record
of His ministry as testified by one of His disciples, John45. They believe there is no variations
of Truth, and its scientific fact, it can’t compromise even for peace’s sake, and all the power
and knowledge is its foundation. It will not compel a person to accept it against their will,
and is a free gift to humanity. Truth will not accommodate itself to our beliefs, and if we follow
‘The Divine Truth’ then we will be free, have a fearless existence, won’t hurt us, and it doesn’t
allow a lie. Yet if we live out of harmony with ‘divine truth’, there will be penalties under what
they call ‘Universal Law’. God’s truth is shown by actions supported by evidence in the
scientific, emotional and physical realms, and in the spiritual manner. They also provide a
way to put these truths of God into practice, for example, “I will never fully be able to discover
all Truth”, “I will eternally be progressing towards knowing God's Truth, and towards God”,
“Understand that if I refuse the accept God's Truth, the most probable reason is that I am
afraid”, “Do not try to "negotiate" with God about Truth”, “I do not expect to receive God's
Love when I am avoiding God's Truth in my life. When I am not receiving God's Love, I
automatically know it is because I am out of harmony with God's Truth”, “Withholding Divine
Truth is harmful to everyone and everything around me”, and many more on the “God’s Truth”
section of “Introduction to Divine Truth Teachings”. 46
Now, for the Laws of God, this is what they have written. They have claimed
Divine Law
that God has created a hierarchy of laws, and the law of God is the framework
of the universe. The lowest laws govern the physical material, the second
Moral and lowest control the physical material that is spiritual in nature, aka, dark
Ethical law
matter and the metaphysical, the second highest is the moral and ethical
laws which affect the human soul, and the highest form of laws control the
Metaphysical
law ability of the human soul to become divine, including immortality,
forgiveness, and repentance. To the right, there is a simplified diagram of the
levels of laws according to Divine Truth. They also provide the following list
Material law
of what is considered apart of each of the laws, as examples, I’ve placed them
in decreasing manner, like the flow chart I have already provided for this
paragraph.
The examples of the Highest form of the Universal Law includes law of repentance, that is to
change from not accepting God’s Truth, as they claim, to accepting it. The Law of Forgiveness,
that is to forgive yourself and others, and the Laws of Divine Love. The second highest form
of the Universal Law, the ones governing human development in love, is the laws of human
love (including sexuality), the Ethical Law, Moral Law, and the Law of Compassion. The Third
highest law is the laws which govern relationships between creatures, including humans, and
that is The Law of Attraction, The Law of Cause and Effect and the Law of Desire. Lastly, the
lowest laws, which govern matter and energy is the Laws of Gravity, aerodynamics, physics,
thermodynamics, transference of matter, dark matter, dark energy, and the laws of dark flow.
On the Laws of Attraction, Cause and Effect, and the Law of Desire.47 I don’t know personally
too much on these new-age laws and philosophies, so I’ll leave them to someone
knowledgeable on them to describe them in relation to the Truth of who God has already
revealed him to be according to Scripture. An excellent resource on the New Age and
Christianity, is a fellow Believer Melissa Dougherty, who shares her thoughts on the new age
and coming to the Biblical Jesus, in her video, “From New Age to Jesus: My Story Out of
45 The Gospel of John, chapter 21, verse 25

46 Divine Truth website, introduction to Divine Truth Teachings, about God’s Truth.
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-teach-godtruth.htm
47 Divine Truth website, introduction to Divine Truth Teachings, about God’s Laws
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-teach-godlaws.htm
17
Deception” [link], she also looked at the New Age and the Bible with Mike Winger, a pastor.
[link]. She has done many videos on Reincarnation, including “Popular Scriptures Misused
to Support Reincarnation”; “The Lack of Reincarnation”; and “Do Past Lives Prove
Reincarnation is True? A Christian Response”.
Divine Truth, when I mention them, I often refer to Divine Truth PTY LTD., which is an
Australian based, privately owned company, that A.J. Miller incorporated on 1st of July, 2004,
and had the former names of TRIPLEBIZ from 1st of October 2002 to 30th July, 2004, then
RealDat until 23rd August, 2007, then Divine Truth Australia until 4 th of March 2011 and
finally to this day, just Divine Truth PTY LTD.48 However, they do have another organisation
call ‘God’s Way LTD’, which is a way for A.J. Miller and Mary Luck to show what “governance
in harmony with God could be like when implemented in an organisation on Earth.” It is the
continuation of God’s Way of Love PTY LTD. 49 50 It was established in 2016, to provide
practical and scientific solutions to the emotional, spiritual, and physical problems humans
face, providing services and seeking to scientifically prove God’s Truth is universal and
benefits humanity. 51
48 Australian Government – Australian Business Register, ABN Lookup -

https://www.abn.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=66100769337
49 Divine Truth Website, Divine Truth Organisations, God’s Way Ltd - https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-
org-gw.htm
50 Divine Truth Website, Divine Truth Organisations, God’s Way of Love PTY LTD -
https://divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#intro-org-gw.htm
51 God’s Way Website; About - https://blog.godsway.net/about-gods-way/
18
DIVINE TRUTH ON CHRISTIANITY AND THE BIBLE
Divine Truth is often called a Christian based new age religious movement because of their
belief that A.J. is Jesus and of new age philosophies. However, this is what they teach about
Christianity and the bible. All the Sources used, and more, in full context can be found on
their ‘Questions’ tab, just look at “Christian Religion” and “Christian Bible” for additional
resources. Though I am trying to give a fair review on the what they teach, I also can’t just
copy and paste the entire document.52 53
A.J. teaches that “Christians today generally have a very firm opinion about whether the Bible
is completely God's Word or not, whereas these people did not have a firm opinion that the
Torah was God's Word. They felt that it was the channelling, the information that came through
Moses from God, but they didn't feel that it was restrictive in the sense that they felt there was
more to it.”54 Yet throughout the scriptures, when prophets are speaking and writing on behalf
of God, it is written that God says that it is His Word.55 A.J. denies the biblical doctrine of
the Trinity, by saying “over a period of the next three or four hundred years, by 325AD, the
Nicene Creed, the Council of Nicaea, by that time there was already a very firm concept,
because most of the men involved in this did not have God in their hearts.”56 And claims an
overused conspiracy that Christmas and Easter were influenced by pagan holidays, adapted
to gain power, saying “For example, the whole idea of Christmas and Easter has a very similar
reason why they came up with those things. They were amalgamations of pagan teachings
with Christianity, which were done many times for political expedience, not just for some kind
of intellectual reasoning or arguments. They were often just done because, "Oh, there's a pagan
over there who believes that we should celebrate December 25th for the sun god, Ra, and then
there's the Christian over there who believes that Jesus was born and that's a good time to
celebrate, and we don't know when Jesus was born so let's make it December 25th so everyone
can be happy."”54, as discussed previously, the council of Nicea was about the nature of God
and Jesus based on scripture, and not to discuss Christmas and easter, it was not to make
up a false doctrine but to affirm what has already been taught in the bible, but if you
remember that he also thinks the bible is made to be different on what was written at the
time of the original Christ, (see pages 13-14). In the same source as the last two quotes, he
denies that The Devil (Satan) is false. He also talks about the Trinity in question 8 and 9,
saying that the doctrine of the trinity was “The primary purpose was political expedience.
There was a fragmenting empire and once the power base of an empire is fragmented then the
empire itself fragments and if all of the power base disagree with each other then of course
there's going to be fragmentation of an empire. Constantine was wise enough to see that, and
so he decided he wanted to amalgamate the empire. Now he could see that the only way to
amalgamate the empire was to have all of the important people in the empire believing the same
things, or nearly the same things, and to excommunicate and exile any person who didn't agree.
That was his primary concern, so from his perspective it was a political reason for making the
choice and decision.” “If you examine the history of it all, which is very, very different from
trying to justify the Trinity through the Bible, you can see that already by 300AD there was a
very firm concept that the Trinity was true. Now of course that meant that all of these glosses
that were included in the sub-texts of all the marginal statements that were made in different
manuscripts, now started to get incorporated into the texts. This was of course very damaging,
52 Christian Religion FAQ Sessions: https://www.divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#faq-religionchristian.htm

53 Christian Bible FAQ Sessions: https://www.divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#faq-bible.htm
54 Divine Truth website, FAQ Session one on the Christian Religion, question 2,
https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130304-1300-1300-jesus-dt-int-hbrchr-002124l1-
How%20did%20early%20followers%20of%20Jesus%20differ%20from%20contemporary%20Christians--en-cliptranscript.pdf
55 Examples include Jeremiah 25:7-8, Jeremiah 1:12, Jeremiah 23:26, Ezekiel 2:3-8, Deuteronomy 18:19
56 Divine Truth website, FAQ Session one on the Christian Religion, question 7 -
How%20did%20the%20doctrine%20of%20the%20Trinity%20come%20about--en-cliptranscript.pdf
19
because this now meant that the Bible itself started to mirror the inaccurate doctrine rather
than just stating what it actually stated.” “The whole reason for the Trinity doctrine was all
about power. It was all about maintaining power in the fragmenting Roman Empire. Eventually,
as you know, the Roman emperor became the pope. In other words, there was an amalgamation
of religion and politics into one position and this amalgamation was of course, historically,
before my coming, also present. Most people who were in politics were also high members of
the religious faith, otherwise they would never have gotten voted into politics or been able to
sustain their position in politics. This has always been the case, where politics and religion
often has a very blurred line between the two. Many of the religious leaders historically were
also the politicians, very similar to how it is in the Muslim world today in fact.”57
“Because I had re-established, through my connection with God, the ability for all humanity to
re-establish a connection with God, in this way I became what I sometimes referred to myself
as "the resurrection and the life." Now I wasn't talking about the resurrection of a physical body.
I was talking about the resurrection of the soul's potentiality to receive Divine Love which Adam
and Eve, the first human couple, Amon and Aman, lost. When Amon and Aman lost the right, if
you like, to receive the gift of Divine Love, they died, not physically, but in the soul potentiality
of receiving Divine Love.” “Let's look at five. It says "He suffered and on the third day he rose
again and ascended to heaven." Well I did suffer, that is true; I did have some suffering, not as
much as many other people on the planet have though. And I didn't rise on the third day. The
reality is I appeared to people on the third day, after being raised the instant I died.” “If we look
at the Constantinople Council statement it says "He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate."
Now, this is completely incorrect. I was not crucified for anyone. My death did not accomplish
anything. You could become at-one with God before I died. You could have become at-one with
God, if you were there in the first century, before I died. My death wouldn't help you become
at-one with God.” “Now there is a Holy Spirit; however the implication of the Council was that
the Holy Spirit was a part of God. The Holy Spirit is an energy of God but it is not an entity of
God, which is very, very different. It's like you saying, for example, that your arm is a part of
you. You wouldn't call your arm 'you' so you would never call the Holy Spirit God because it is
only a part of God; it is an energy of God in fact. Your arm is an energetic thing connected to
your will, it is not you. I could not say your arm is you; I couldn't look at your hand and go,
"That's you." You are your complete being. God is the complete being” “This is a very sad thing
because if our concept of God is flawed then there's a high likelihood we're not connecting to
God when we think we are; this is the danger of a flawed concept with God. You see, as we
grow towards God we will gain more and more of God's concept of God and not our own concept
of God. The trouble with the Trinity doctrine is that it is a manmade concept of God and therefore
it will, if continued to be believed, prevent relationship with God rather than sustaining it.”58
However, there is good reason why we, as Christians believe in the concept of Trinity, and it
is an orthodox belief. In Genesis, and throughout the bible, a name, or word of God, is Elohim,
which is a plural word, and the word ‘us’ can be found. (Genesis 1:1, 26; 3:22; 11:7; Isaiah
6:8, 48:16, 61:1; Matthew 3:16-17, 28:19; 2 Corinthians 13:14). Got Questions, an Christian
apologetics ministry, has an article explaining the biblical belief in the Bible on their article
“What does the Bible teach about the Trinity?”59 it is also written in both testaments, the
For%20what%20purpose%20did%20church%20fathers%20create%20the%20Christian%20Trinity%20doctrine--en-
cliptranscript.pdf
Where%20was%20the%20Church%20hierarchy%20mistaken%20with%20the%20Trinity%20doctrine--en-cliptranscript.pdf
59 Got Questions, gotquestions.org “What does the Bible teach about the Trinity?” https://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html
20
earliest reference to “The Trinity” was Tertullian, who was born 130 years after Christ, but
early on in Christian belief.60 61
On the topic of the Bible, A.J. says that “This is that I feel quite strongly about the Bible. I have
quite a strong love for the Bible because of the things it brought me personally, particularly in
my first century life. I had access to the books that are now contained within the Bible at
different times of my life, particularly during my childhood; I would visit synagogues regularly
throughout my life and I spent a lot of time studying what is now called the Old Testament of
the Bible. This is the reason why I could quote pieces of the Old Testament of the Bible to the
Pharisees of the day … Every time I read, for example, about God being a punishing God, being
the God of the Israelites who would lead them into the promised land and destroy the wicked
people around about, I always felt disconnection from that, so I never really believed any of
that as God's motivation for the Israelite nation. But when I read about how God feels about
the individual, how God has this longing to have a connection, to have the heart of people
change from a heart of stone into a heart of flesh and all of these other things, I felt a deep
passion for God under those circumstances and I realised, “Yeah, this is really getting down to
the meat of what God is all about.” And so I started to see through this interaction that there
were times of inspiration of these people who had written. … The second group of people are a
group of people who believe that the Bible is wholly God's word, completely God's word without
modification, that God has protected this Bible throughout the centuries from its creation and
these people believe, or say they believe, absolutely everything in it” 62
“God is an infinite being as far as I am aware and God's Love is infinite. I also believe, as a
result, that God's Truth is infinite. Now an infinite truth cannot ever be contained in a finite
book. A book like the Bible is generally around about a thousand pages or so, and there is no
way that such a book can contain all of the truth of God. In fact the Bible itself even states that.
It actually suggests in the Book of Revelation that there will be further revelations of Truth at
some point in the future, and so the Bible itself suggests that it is not the complete revelation of
God. Any person who assumes that it's the complete revelation of God is already making an
invalid assumption that is not based on any logic but rather based on what they hope, which
is very very different from actually having any accuracy in terms of truth or any proof or
evidence, in terms of whether the Bible should be the thing we live by. … There are many things
in the Bible that you could live by and do well. In fact if you looked at the Bible's viewpoint of
ethics for example, particularly what I presented in the first century about the Golden Rule, as
I've mentioned many times, if you lived by that in your life you would do very well. You'd never
want somebody to murder you, so you wouldn't murder anybody. You'd never want somebody
to go to war with you, so you wouldn't go to war with anybody. You'd never want somebody to
rape you, so you wouldn't rape anybody. You'd never want somebody to steal from you, so you
wouldn't steal from anybody, and so forth. If you followed that one principle, which is one verse
in the Bible, then you would do very very well; you'd pass over into the spirit world in a very
good condition if you followed it completely. … Well the Bible itself states that it is inspired of
God and the only inspired word of God. Men wrote this in order to have people believe what
they said and not accept anything else. To actually make this statement is a way of controlling
people. Because the Bible states this many people believe it and as a result of them believing it
60 Got Questions, gotquestions.org “What is the origin of the Doctrine of The Trinity? https://www.gotquestions.org/origin-
doctrine-trinity.html
61 Dale Tuggy, The Stanford Enclyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2021 edition) - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/trinity/trinity-
history.html#Up325CE
62 AJ Miller – Bible FAQ - Session 1, Question 2 https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130121-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-
int-bkrcbb-001457l1-What%20is%20Jesus'%20(AJ%20Miller's)%20general%20opinion%20of%20the%20Bible--en-
cliptranscript.pdf
21
they then assume that everything that's contained within it is the inspired word of God and
they feel that anybody who doesn't follow it can be condemned.”63
“The single most serious flaw in the Bible is how the Bible portrays God. That is the single most
serious flaw in the Bible. It portrays God as sometimes loving, sometimes not. Sometimes loving,
sometimes punishing. Sometimes loving, sometimes angry. Sometimes wrathful, sometimes
wise, sometimes not. Sometimes a megalomaniac, sometimes not. Sometimes narcissistic,
sometimes not, and so forth.” “All of the Bible writers, even the writers who associated with me
in the first century, had a flawed concept of God, because at times they believed God was
punishing, at times believed God was not; at times they believed that God demanded worship
or was narcissistic in the sense that God needed everybody to worship him” 64
As Christians, yes, we do believe that the bible is the inspired word of God, that the bible
shares with the historical reality of Jesus, what He taught, and the history of the world, then
we as Christians, will obviously see the world from the source of truth. On the critique that
God is sometimes loving but sometimes punishing, from question 5, (the last paragraph) the
way we as Christians see it is as follows. We see God as our father, creator, and the giver of
Laws, like A.J. would. Because God gives laws and rules like a father or a king would, then
it would rightly follow that if you do something that goes against the rules of a father, like, if
you don’t clean your room, make a mess on the walls, or attack your brother. The father, who
loves both of his children, would punish the person who was unloving, naughty, went against
the rules of the family, or the law of the land, because it would be unloving to the victim that
the perpetrator walks free. It would be loving to the perpetrator, to let him free but unloving
to the victim. It would be loving to the perpetrator that if the father cares about his soul too,
that punishment would be for the purpose of growing him in understanding that God wants
and expects this from all creation, here is how to get there, and here is how to remedy it.
Which we Christians teach as the story of redemption. Those who do not seek to follow truth,
love, and the laws set by the lawgiver, should be punished according to the Laws which he
gave, but it is loving that God did provide a way for us to remedy how we can fix our souls,
our mind and our hearts, and that is through Jesus Christ making the way, not by our own
doings, except that be for us to give our sins up, pick up our cross and follow the teachings,
life and believing in Jesus. This is the way God has always intended, and this is what A.J. is
denying and it is unloving to God, it is evil to change His way, His will and to lie to all people.
I worry that people have started following him, letting go of truth, and are following a false
Christ. Its possible because I was someone who left Christianity, and followed A.J. I left the
truth for the truth of a man who is deceived and is deceiving to this day.
63 AJ Miller – BIBLE FAQ – Session 1, Question 3 https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130121-1300-1300-jesmm-

dt-int-bkrcbb-003222l1-Is%20the%20Bible%20the%20full%20and%20only%20truth%20we%20should%20live%20by--en-
cliptranscript.pdf
64 AJ Miller – BIBLE FAQ – Session 1, Question 5 https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130121-1300-1300-jesmm-
dt-int-bkrcbb-004700l1-What%20are%20the%20Bible's%20most%20serious%20flaws--en-cliptranscript.pdf
22
TEACHINGS ON THE RETURN OF JESUS
In the second session of questions that A.J. did with his partner, Mary, on the Bible, back in
March 2013, he was asked questions on certain biblical verses, such as the Acts account of
how Christ ascended into heaven; the first Thessalonians scripture about those who are
faithful who have fallen asleep will be rose in the last days; the John 18 scripture where Jesus
declares that he is the king. However, we must identify which bible verse they are using in
each question. I’ve seen him use a New World Translation prior.
“After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their
sight. They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men
dressed in white stood beside them. “Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here
looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come
back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven.” (ACTS 1:9-11 New International
Version)
This scripture is a commonly used scripture to describe how Christians view Christ’s return,
even I’ve used it in this publication on page 12. Now the main question based on this scripture
toward A.J. that Mary asks is “Surely this means that Jesus will return on the clouds in the
same manner he left the earth?”, how do you think A.J. responded on based what you’ve seen
so far? Correct, that it is wrong! He starts the answer by saying “This is a comment that most
Christians make to me, that I can't be Jesus because I didn't return on the clouds just as it says
here in the book of Acts. But of course in the Book of Acts, most Christians also say that it'll be
seen throughout the entire world, so there are a lot of physical impossibilities involved in having
these scriptures fulfilled.” Then adds his understanding; “only a small group of my followers
were present, that's all. The world didn't see me go and in fact not all of my followers saw me
go. Now if that's the case, if I'm going to return in the same way then not all of my followers will
see me return either.”65
Except, if you’re going to use one verse to describe the return as if there is only one verse,
then we will have to ignore all of scripture. On the other scriptures referring to Christ’s return,
such as Matthew 24:22-35, Mark 13:20-31, and Luke 21:20-28, he states “The reality is that
I am saying that I am Jesus. The reality is also that I didn't come in the manner the Bible
describes, so that is obviously a conundrum for many Christians.” “I am claiming to be Jesus
and the Bible does say that I will come in a certain way, and I haven't come in the way the
Bible explains. So there is a decision that most Christians need to make, and that is, "Do I
believe that the Bible is the infallible Word of God on this matter or do I start analysing the
person who says he's Jesus and see what he turns out to be? What do I do?" Now most
Christians choose to believe that the Bible is the infallible Word of God on the matter and
therefore discount any claim that I might make. Now my suggestion is that that's a very illogical
thing to do. The reason why it's illogical is that the Bible isn't the infallible Word of God for a
start.” “So what I suggest to every Christian who believes that the Bible is God's Word, if they
cannot give up this belief now on earth, this is what I suggest to you. When you die and pass
into the spirit world and find that everything is not as you imagined it to be, then ask the people
who wrote these words to come to you and explain what they actually said. That's what I
suggest to you. When you have these interactions with these people ‒ and these people will be
willing to have these interactions with you ‒ then listen to them, and listen to the evidence and
65AJ Miller – Divine Truth website, FAQ Session 2 on the Bible, Question 1 -
https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130310-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-bkrcbb-000038l1-
Acts%201v9t11%20Surely%20Jesus%20would%20return%20on%20the%20clouds--en-cliptranscript.pdf
23
proof that they provide and once you do you will realise that this book, although it claims to be
the full and complete and only Word of God, it is not.”66
So, yes, we do believe that the bible is the word of God, we can see the history of the bible
through manuscripts evidence, and we can know what the errors of the text was, like typos,
and produce an accurate record of what was written. Yet, to claim to be Jesus, is to deny the
beliefs of Christ and Christianity, and is to say essentially ‘no, you are wrong cause I said so
cause I’m the one you’re meant to follow. I know what I said back 2000 years ago, you weren’t
there, I know better’ to make the ones who have a fair critique of your claims based upon a
religious document, that even atheist scholars can get behind and say that the things written
in the bible in English and Greek, and Hebrew, are accurate to what was written, though
granted, not everyone believes in the spiritual claims, is to say that everyone is wrong unless
they think like A.J.. As such, he provides an ego that a lot of people have, and that is
narcissistic tendencies of having a higher sense of self-importance, recognised as superior
(claiming to Jesus), and may have delusions like a form of Psychosis, from what I’ve seen of
him as he has heard spirits in mediumship, having delusions of being Jesus. Yet, I’m not his
personal doctor, nor do I hold a doctorate in anything medical. But, these signs do match
what is being claimed of A.J., and I do wonder if he truly did get any sort of help at first, with
leaving the Jehovah’s Witnesses, a very controlling group, and very much the textbook
definition of a Christian cult, and when he claimed to have started getting these thoughts
that he was Jesus, because this is affecting the lives of other people now, and many have
woke up to the truth of such absurd claims from A.J. and Mary being obviously false and it
is beyond a joke.
66AJ Miller – Divine Truth website, FAQ Session 2 on the Bible, Question 7 -
https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130310-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-bkrcbb-012404l1-
Matthew%2024%20Mark%2013%20Luke%2021%20All%20have%20not%20seen%20his%20return%20so%20AJ%20Miller%20can'
t%20be%20Jesus--en-cliptranscript.pdf
24
TEACHING ON PRAYER
Like any religious movement that believes in a god

My Father, Who is in Heaven, I recognise that
You are All Holy and Loving and Merciful, and or gods, Divine Truth has teachings on prayer to
that I am Your child, and not the subservient, God. In this section, we’ll briefly look at some things
sinful, and depraved creature that false he teachings on prayer. Since I am unable to just
teachers would have me believe. I know that I
copy everything, he has written on this or any topic,
am the greatest of Your creations, and the
most wonderful of all Your Handiworks, and you will be able to find the sources in the footnotes,
the object of Your Great Soul’s Love and like in other sections to do further research, and
Tenderest Care. you may be able to add more research that I may of
not even covered. In the prayer section this is what
I know that Your Will is that I become at-one
with You and partake of Your Great Love A.J. and Mary teaches.
which You have bestowed upon me through
Your Mercy and Desire that I become, in To the right, here is a prayer that they offer for
truth, Your child through Love, and not praying for Divine Love. Here is what A.J. has
through the sacrifice and death of any of Your
taught on the prayer in The Prayer for Divine Love
Creatures. I pray that You will open up my
soul to the inflowing of Your Love, and that which was written on the 10th of October 2005.
then will come to me Your Holy Spirit to bring
into my soul this, Your Divine Love, in great “Firstly, it must be stated, that within the prayer are
abundance, until my soul is transformed into contained many Truths which, when felt by the
the very essence of Yourself; and that there prayerful soul, will allow the individual to come to a
will come to me faith – such faith as will cause
me to realize that I truly am your child and
more complete knowledge of how our Father feels,
one with You in very substance, and not in and the operations of His Laws, particularly His
image only. Laws of Love. It is very important to come to know
how He feels, since His Love is a feeling of His, and
Let me have such faith, as will cause me to
know that You are my Father, and the it is not a feeling or substance which comes from any
bestower of every good and perfect gift, and other source than from the Soul of our Father. Since
that, only I myself, can prevent Your Love the prayer demonstrates many Truths regarding the
from changing me from the mortal to the
method of becoming at-one with Him, and being
immortal. Let me never cease to realise that
Your Love is waiting for each and all of us, atone with Him means that we have a relationship
and, that when I come to You, in faith and with Him, it naturally follows that we will come to
earnest aspiration, Your Love will never be know how our Father feels about many subjects,
withheld from me.
since these feelings of His will be given to us as we
Keep me in the shadow of Your Love every grow in this relationship.”67 “I must emphasise that
hour and moment of my life, and help me to prayer is by far the most important part of personal
overcome all the temptations of the flesh, and soul progression. When we have a best friend, we
the influence of the powers of the evil ones
really enjoy their company and companionship, and,
who so constantly surround me and
endeavour to turn my thoughts away from if time goes by without seeing the friend, we
You to the pleasures and allurements of this generally have a strong longing to spend time with
world. them and talk to them on a wide variety of subjects.
I thank you for Your Love and the privilege of
If we spend time with someone and discuss things
receiving it, and I believe that You are my dear to our heart with them, and listen to things that
Father – the Loving Father who smiles upon are dear to their heart, a level of intimacy is attained.
me in my weakness, and is always ready to The closest level of intimacy is possible with our God,
help me and take me into Your Arms of Love.
I pray this with all the earnestness and
since we can communicate with Him via our feelings,
sincere longings of my soul, and, trusting in and He also can do the same with us. Since He has
Your Love, give You all the glory and honour no love injuries, His expressions to us will always be
and love that my finite soul can give. in our best interest, and His Love will forever result
AMEN in our personal happiness. In this way, the Prayer
67“Relationship with God The Prayer for Divine Love Commentary” – A.J. Miller – 10th October 2005, pg 1
https://www.divinetruth.com/docts/2010/20100519-1300-1300-jesus-dt-wrt-dopray--
Prayer%20For%20Divine%20Love%20Commentary--en-letter-merge.pdf
25
for Divine Love in the Padgett messages was constructed with the feelings and emotions of the
soul desirous of a close relationship with its Father in mind, and the expressions of the prayer,
although formed in words, need to be formed by the feelings of the soul when communicating
its soul longings to God.”68 “For this reason, a person who was a drunkard on earth, after he
or she has died, will often attempt to find another drunkard through which they can receive the
feelings obtained by drunkenness. Since a spirit can connect to the body of a mortal in the same
way as the mortal’s own spirit body can, the spirit believes itself to be satisfied by the actions
of the mortal. If the mortal is of such a state of mind and development to allow the spirit in error
to make the connection, then there are always many spirits desirous of doing so, and the result
can be that the mortal is then driven by both its own desires and the desires of the spirit. This
influence can be felt with all types of destructive behaviour, including drinking, drugs, smoking,
sexual activity, and so forth. In addition, even if the spirit cannot gain control of the body, it can
lead the mortal through a series of thoughts into a pattern of thinking or behaviour that can be
misleading and unfruitful. Often, a spirit may be in a position of spiritual error, and when the
mortal moves in a path that disagrees with the spirits conception of the truth, the spirit that still
has underlying bad motives or incorrect beliefs may take action as far as it can to prevent the
mortal from following the true path, just as a person on earth may attempt to do. From this it
can be seen that there is some danger in developing a connection with spirits, and trusting that
everything a spirit tells us is the truth. A spirit, although having more knowledge of things
material is still like ourselves, and can be in just as much spiritual darkness as we personally
are, and potentially can even be in a worse spiritual condition. For this reason it is very
important that we develop ourselves spiritually by prayer and developing the true conception
of soul progression, and develop a relationship with our Father as the Primary Source of Truth.”
69
In the letter titled A Burning Desire for God70, written on the 22nd of February, 2006, he writes,
“Sometimes a persons desire for Divine Love is motivated totally by a desire to be happy
personally, and to be free of the worries and strife that a life of alienation from God brings. In
other words, we often seek Divine Love for less than pure reasons that come from selfish needs.
Our relationship with God will expose all desires and passions that are disharmonious with
Love. Our Divine Parent is sincere in all His Feelings and Emotions, and He also instantly knows
when our motives are pure and sincere, because these qualities resonate with His Soul. When
we begin prayer, having a burning desire is not always possible because other emotional
baggage that must be released taints desire, only upon release of emotional error can a pure
and sincere desire be realized. As we release our harmful emotions, we grow in sincerity and
purity, and our desire for God grows. In time, as we progress and grow in soul development
with the assistance of God’s Love, our Free Will is able to be exercised in a completely pure
manner, and with sincerity.”71 He teaches that we must have prayers that are in harmony
with the laws of God, and not based just on our human feelings of hurt, pain and anger. In a
document called “Divine Forgiveness” written in July 2005, he writes “Perhaps at this point it
would be good to mention an example of a prayer harmonious with the principles mentioned
above. These examples are based on the assumption that we desire to become at-one with our
Father. Firstly, lets assume that we feel very angry within ourselves about an event or
circumstance that has occurred. It could be that we believe that someone has wronged us
(whether this belief is the Truth or not), or it could be that when things seem to “go wrong” in
our life, we always seem to respond in anger. We may demonstrate that anger outwardly, by
yelling or screaming at someone else, or treating them with resentment, whether that someone
be the person we feel is “making” us angry, or whether that person is an innocent bystander.
68 “Relationship with God The Prayer for Divine Love Commentary” – A.J. Miller – 10th October 2005, pg 8
69 “Relationship with God The Prayer for Divine Love Commentary” – A.J. Miller – 10th October 2005, pg 14
70 “A burning Desire For God” – A.J. Miller – 22nd February 2006 https://www.divinetruth.com/docts/2006/20060222-1700-1700-
jesus-dt-wrt-hrwgod--A%20Burning%20Desire%20For%20God--en-letter.pdf
71 “A burning Desire For God” – A.J. Miller – 22nd February 2006, page 14
26
Or, rather than yelling or screaming, we may just treat other person coldly without love,
expecting within ourselves that all persons are out to injure or hurt us, and we may come to
completely ignore the person, treating them as if they do not exist. We could also refuse to
demonstrate the outward expressions of anger, but internalise the anger so much that we
become depressed, and unwilling to cooperate with others or take personal responsibility for
our own lives, believing other people “owe” us because of how “painful” our lives have been.”72
And lastly, he teaches that “To contact Him, all we need do is have a soul longing for His Love,
and, if that longing is sincere and we have a desire to experience emotions, then our Father’s
Love will flow into us, and we shall feel it. Finding God is simplicity itself, so simple in fact that
the majority of mankind, mortals and spirits, overlook the only method we have of ever finding
Divine Truth, which is made possible by two things; the sincere desire of a man to seek for and
feel God and His Love (which we call Prayer), and the overwhelming Passion of God to give all
His Children His Love, and have all of His Children come to know Him and experience the joy
and happiness of Living in His Love. This is the Greatest Experiment, and when any person
tries it, the experiment often begins tentatively, but ends in complete certainty. God is Reality,
and the Love and Truth that comes from Him is Real. When we try the Greatest Experiment, we
at that time also begin to live in Reality.”73
72 “Divine Forgiveness” – A.J. Miller – 10th July 2005 pg 3 - https://www.divinetruth.com/docts/2005/20050712-1500-1600-jesus-

dt-wrt-hrwgod--Divine%20Forgiveness--en-letter.pdf
73 “The Greatest Experiment” – A.J. Miller – 20th February 2006 pg 10 https://www.divinetruth.com/docts/2006/20060220-1800-
1800-jesus-dt-wrt-hrwgod--The%20Greatest%20Experiment--en-letter.pdf
27
GOD’S LAWS AND SIN
The way that Divine Truth and A.J. teaches about sin is as follows. That all the laws of the
universe, made by God, are divine, saying “All Laws are Divine, in the sense that all Law has
been created by our God, and brought into existence to maintain harmony in His Universe. This
includes Laws that are purely of the material (such as gravity, aerodynamics and so forth), and
those of a spiritual (Laws of Natural Love), and soul (Laws of Divine Love) nature.”74 He explains
sin as the following: “is a missing the mark or violation of any of God’s Laws. Sin is not an
abstract concept, with sin existing only in the minds of individuals as modern philosophers
have a tendency to believe. No, this is all wrong, and when such individuals attempt to progress
after their arrival in the spirit world, they will come face to face with the true concept of sin and
error. Sin is real, and its consequences exist for every violation of a Law of God.”75 If anyone
breaks the Law of God, or sins, A.J. explains that “the law that is broken requires a penalty
for its violation, and, in all cases, this penalty is required from the soul. In this way, judgement
is immediate and real, as explained by my message titled; “After Death, the Judgement: What
It Is and What It Is Not.” Obviously, as explained by that message, the soul may not always
have a consciousness of the results of its sin at the time it sinned, and so, often, a person may
only become aware of the condition of their soul only at the time of the death of the material
body. However, this condition exists, and is real, at the time the sin is committed, and remains
until either the penalty is paid in full as the Law of Compensation requires, or if the greater
Laws of Divine Forgiveness are brought into operation by the penitent soul.”76
74 “Divine Law and Sin” – A.J. Miller – 11th July 2005 – pg 1 https://www.divinetruth.com/docts/2005/20050712-1500-1500-
jesus-dt-wrt-hrwgod--Divine%20Law%20&%20Sin--en-letter.pdf
75 “Divine Law and Sin” – A.J. Miller – 11th July 2005 – pg 2
76 “Divine Law and Sin” – A.J. Miller – 11th July 2005 – pg 2
28
FINAL CONCULUSIONS
This Document I have written is done in love for people who are honest seekers of truth,
and for those people who follow the teachings of A.J. Miller, Mary Luck, and of Divine
Truth, and for A.J. and Mary themselves. Though I strongly disagree based on the bible’s
historical account of the life of Jesus, that A.J. is the return of Him, and that what he
teaches is anti-Christ, against God, yet have some truth in what he claims about the
physical world and the need to believe in God, and truth, the way he is teaching it and what
he claims, is very much worrisome to me. Not just for those who follow his and Mary’s
teachings, but for both of them. I want them to gain eternal life, be in full relationship with
God, but they must turn and repent before the day that The Lord takes them up and believe
in the true Jesus Christ. I say these things and I am critical of the claims they make,
because they do not match what Jesus originally claimed regarding his second coming, and
they are deceiving many.
If A.J., Mary, or any of the volunteers of Divine Truth or its organisations sees this
document, please just hear me out. I did my research, I looked at what A.J. has written and
claimed, I have seen his interviews from across the web, I have watched Mary speak on
videos, and listen and pondered on them, and I do not believe either is telling the truth.
A.J., I don’t think you are telling the truth, yet I think that you honestly believe that you are
Jesus, that you’ve come again, and that you honestly believe what you are saying. Same
goes for you Mary. Listen, I have looked at, prayed about and pondered all you have done
and taught since I first heard about you on Sunday Night, all those years ago, I only looked
at your direct teachings on your website, I looked at interviews where you share your story,
not even the big media companies, but the YouTube interviews you’ve done. I looked far
across your resources, your questions, and events pages, I looked and pondered your
videos. Yes, I could have added more to this document to give a full sense of everything you
teach to those who’ll see this first, but I also want them who read to go and look at the
original teachings and documents where I got the quotes from, in fact I encourage all people
to do their own study and not just rely on my conclusions, cause like how you’ve claimed
you’re still learning, so am I, and I don’t claim I know more than you do. Infact, this
document is provided for free, so that people can build on top of it, do their research and
provide more thoughts and research so that more people can know about it and come to
their own conclusions.
To those who want to make a comment, or respond to what I have written, even to A.J. and
Mary, if you want to explain to me more of why you follow them, or if I have gotten
something wrong, then I am more than happy ton hear it. In the footer of the document on
every page is my email address, and I would love to hear what I have gotten wrong, and
what parts I may I have misunderstood in the document, and I would love to correct it. For
those who want to defend A.J. and Mary, please do so, and add more context that I may
have missed out on, or that I could have included without making this into a full book.
To my fellow Bible-believing Christians, please use this as a tool, and go and do more
research on Divine Truth, and come to your own conclusions, and if you do apologetics or
ministry, please email me more information that I could have included that I may have not
touched on from our side of this aisle, as I would love to keep this updated so that we may
all benefit from knowing what is truth, and what all this could mean for humanity.
Thank you all;
Dean C. Liddell
29

Divine Truth and The Return of Jesus

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Divine Truth and The Return of Jesus

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DIVINE TRUTH & THE

THE RETURN OF JESUS

© 2022 – Dean C. Liddell

Words of A.J. Miller in Red, Italicised and underlined.

Originally published: 2nd of November 2022 A.D.

© 2022 | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

ABOUT A.J. AND MARY

ALAN JOHN MILLER

This is Alan John Miller, as pictured in 2009, he is a person who

Port Lincon, S.A., however, though having two sons,

2 A.J. is referencing the year 2006

3 The Gospel of John, Chapter 10, verses 25-38

4 Jesus Identity Session 1, Question 1 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-

9 Jesus Identity Session 1, Question 6 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-

17 Deuteronomy, chapter 18, verses 10 to 12

27 Jesus’ Identity, Session 1, question 15 https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2012/20121030-1300-1300-jesmm-dt-int-14jm21-

Mary S. Luck, the partner of Alan John Miller, claims to be

33 “On the Formation of The New Testament Bible Cannon”, pg 15

39 Mary’s Identity, session 1, question 1. https://divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130902-1300-1300-marym-dt-int-14jmel-

DIVINE TRUTH AND ITS TEACHINGS

45 The Gospel of John, chapter 21, verse 25

48 Australian Government – Australian Business Register, ABN Lookup -

DIVINE TRUTH ON CHRISTIANITY AND THE BIBLE

52 Christian Religion FAQ Sessions: https://www.divinetruth.com/sites/main/en/index.htm#faq-religionchristian.htm

63 AJ Miller – BIBLE FAQ – Session 1, Question 3 https://www.divinetruth.com/clips/docts/2013/20130121-1300-1300-jesmm-

TEACHINGS ON THE RETURN OF JESUS

Like any religious movement that believes in a god

72 “Divine Forgiveness” – A.J. Miller – 10th July 2005 pg 3 - https://www.divinetruth.com/docts/2005/20050712-1500-1600-jesus-

GOD’S LAWS AND SIN

Thank you all;

You might also like