Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) Generalist
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) General
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) Generalist
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) Industrial Education
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) Music
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) General
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade (fill color) the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) Home Economics
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
Cateel Central Elementary School/Cateel 1 District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an asterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from Au said through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)
The passage of the K to 12 Law (R.A. 10533) in June 2013 as a response to the changes and
challenges of the modern world has changed the landscape of the teacher quality
requirements in the Philippines. The current reform calls for teachers to critically reflect on
their roles and the expectations of them on the context of K to 12 Education.
This tool is designed for you to reflect on the different objectives related to your professional
work. It consists of 13 items that you will analyze and rate according to your level of
capability and level of priority for development. The items meet teacher quality
requirements congruent with the Philippine K to 12 Reform and reflective of international
teacher standards.
For Part I: Demographic Profile, please shade the circle of the demographic information
applicable to you.
For Part II: Objectives, please shade the circle that corresponds to how you rate the
objectives based on (1) level of capability and (2) level of priority for development. At the
bottom of each page, there is the opportunity to write about any aspects that you feel are
relevant to the objectives on that page.
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Please shade the circle that is applicable to you.
1. Age
Under 25
25-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Over 55
2. Sex
Male
Female
3. Employment Status
Full-Time
Part-Time
Contractual
4. Position
Teacher I (less than 3 years)
Teacher I (more than 3 years)
Teacher II
Teacher III
Master Teacher I
Master Teacher II
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher IV
5. Highest Degree Obtained
Bachelor's Degree
Master's Degree
Doctorate Degree
6. Area of Specialization
English
Filipino
Mathematics
General Science
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Others (Specify) __________________________
7. Grade Level taught
Kindergarten
Primary
Intermediate
Junior High School
Senior High School
8. Curricular Classification of the School
Kindergarten
Grades 1-6
Grades 7-10
Kinder and Grades 1-6
Kinder and Grades 7-10
Grades1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6 and Grades 7-10
Kinder, Grades 1-6, Grades 7-10 and Grades 11-12
9. School/District
There are two columns for every objective. Please type an aterisk (*) on the box in each column corresponding to how
you rate each objective according to the level of your capability in performing each objective and the development
priority you give to each objective will be automatically answered and the "High" and Very High" will also be
highlighted.
In the box below, please provide any general comments you may have about the objectives.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
Priority for
Level of Capability Development
Very High
Very High
Moderate
Moderate
OBJECTIVES
High
High
Low
Low
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
3. Curriculum and Planning
5. Plus Factor
Optional: In the space provided, you may want to make some personal comments about your practice and the
objectives on the page.
This tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from AusAid through the Basic
Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.