Professional Documents
Culture Documents
22RO Master 231120
22RO Master 231120
Year
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987
After-tax operating cash flow (1) 110 159 295 185 0
Capital investment (2) 450 0 0 0 0 0
Increase in working capital (3) 0 50 100 100 -125 -125
Net cash flow (1)-(2)-(3) -450 60 59 195 310 125
Hurdle rate 20%
NPV -46
Mark II Microcomputer
Year
1982 ………. 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
After-tax operating cash flow 220 318 590 370 0
Increase in working capital 100 200 200 -250 -250
Net cash flow 120 118 390 620 250
Present Value @ 20% 807,1
Investment required (Exercise Price) 900,0
Forecasted NPV in 1985 -92,9
Hurdle rate 20%
Annual interest rate 10%
Present Value (Expected Cash inflows)@ 20% 467,1 in 1982
Investment, PV @ 10% (PV(EX)) 676,2 in 1982
NPV in 1982 (commitment to invest in Mark II) -209,1
Mark II Microcomputer
Forecasted cash flows from 1982
Year
1982 ………. 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
After-tax operating cash flow 220 318 590 370 0
Increase in working capital 100 200 200 -250 -250
Net cash flow 120 118 390 620 250
Present Value @ 20% 807,1
Investment required 900,0
Forecasted NPV in 1985 -92,9
Hurdle rate 20%
Annual interest rate 10%
Present Value (Expected Cash inflows)@ 20% 467,1 in 1982
Investment, PV @ 10% (PV(EX)) 676,2 in 1982
NPV in 1982 (commitment to invest in Mark II) -209,1
900
PV (exercise price) = 3 = 676
1.1
OC = [N (d1 ) × P ] − [N (d 2 ) × PV(EX)]
d1 = log[ P / PV(EX)] / σ t + σ t / 2
= log[.691 / .606] + .606 / 2 = −.3072
d 2 = d1 − σ t = −.3072 − .606 = −.9134
N (d1 ) = .3793 N (d 2 ) = .1805
Call value = [.3793 × 467} − [.1805 × 676] = $55.12 million
Intrinsic Value
Option price
Stock price
Stock price
Corporate Finance II José A. de Azevedo Pereira 11
2. Option to Wait
Stock price
Corporate Finance II José A. de Azevedo Pereira 12
2. Timing Option Example: Malted Herring
Possible cash flows and end-of-period values for the malted herring
project are shown. The project costs $180 million, either now or later.
Currently, it has a PV of $200million. The figures in parentheses show
payoffs from the option to wait and to invest later if the project is
positive-NPV at year 1. If demand is high in year 1, the FCF will be
$25 million and the PV of the whole project, $ 250million. However,
if demand is low, the FCF will only reach $ 16million and the PV
will be $160million. Waiting means loss of the first year’s cash flows.
The problem is to figure out the current value of the option.
Risk neutral
return = 5%
Corporate Finance II José A. de Azevedo Pereira 14
2. Timing Option Example : Malted Herring
The next step requires the calculation of the probability of there
being a high demand for the malted herring project.
Expected return = (prob. of high demand) × .375 + (1 − prob. of high demand) × (-.12)
Expected return = .05
Prob. of high demand = .343
Hurdles for any project to be chosen: 1) NPV must exceed $240million; 2)Its
NPV must exceed the other project’s NPV by a significant amount.
$1.125
= −$12.5 + =0
0.09
$450,000
= =$5
0.09
( ! " #) = $480,000
&
=' + ( ' ) * ' − )) & (* & − ' * &+)
$5.5
& = $0.480 + − 5.0 = $ 0.768 = $768,000
1.04
Consequently,
&ℎ * / '& = $5.0 + $0,768 = $5.768
&ℎ * / '& 0 " " " & + = $5.5
Value in
Value of tanker operation
Cost of
reactivating
Value if
Mothballing mothballed
costs
Tanker rates
Practical reasons why real options are not always feasible to use:
1. Valuation of real options can be complex and sometimes it is impossible to
arrive at the “perfect” answer.
2. Real options do not always have a clear structure regarding their path and
cash flows.
3. Competitors also have real options, which can alter the value of your options
by altering the underlying assumptions and environment that serves as the
basis of your valuation.
Given these limitations, real options are not always the best approach when
valuing projects.