JURNAL INTERNASIONAL

MEKANIKA FLUIDA

Disusun Oleh:

Renold Yanspri Pratama

21410013

DOSEN : DR. Ligal Sebastian,S.T.,M.SI / KH. Rizal, S.T

JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL

UNIVERSITAS PALEMBANG
INTRODUCTION
Marine propulsion systems basically operate over a widespread
speed range. The driveefficiency of the marine propulsion system varies
over the speed range to which the system isapplied. marines and
submerged vehicles like submarines, torpedoes and submersibles and soon
utilizes propeller for propulsion. The force is produced against the flow of
water which iscalled as thrust force. The propeller is the most important
device to run marine safely at sea.In the present analysis the propeller
sharp edge material is changed over from aluminummetal to fiber fortified
composite material for submerged vehicle propeller

PRINCIPLES OF MARINE PROPULSION

The workings of the marine propulsion system and the main engine as the
main powerprovider provides power to the transmission system. The
amount of power received by thetransmission system depends on how
much efficiency the main engine. The power that entersthe transmission
system will be continued to propulsor, so that the propulsor or the
marine'smotion equipment can move due to the power received from the
transmission system.The transmission system functions as a liaison
between the main engine and propulsor. Thissystem functions to continue
the power generated by the main engine to the marine's motionequipment.

METHODOLOGYT

he methodology used in this paper is using Solidworks to create geometry

part of the propeller withspecified dimension and Ansys Fluent to create
the mesh and the flow simulation with a predeterminedtreatment such as
applying rotational velocity, viscous model, gravity, calculation method to
find theaffected parameter of propeller
COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN

Determining the internal stress in a propeller would be a difficult task

containing many reasons.The load on it can be maximum or minimum,
distribution of load on the surface of the blades istypical to determine and
the geometry of the blade is also complex. Based on the
practicalexperience simple methods are used to calculate the stresses and
adopt an enormous factor ofsafety.

Calculations

Diameter = 720 mm Number of blades = 6Propeller Model = INSEAN

E779AType of propeller = Controllable pitch propeller Material =
Aluminum and CFRPTotal area of the circle =∏R2=407,150.408 mmTotal
blade area = total area of the circle X disc area ratioGiven disc area ratio =
0.689Total blade area =407,150.408 x 0.689= 280,526.631 mm2Relation
between pitch & pitch angle Formulae; pitch (p) = 2∏r x tan aWhere
@=pitch angle and r= radius and ∏ Pitch angle =120Pitch=2 x ∏ x 360 x
tan120= 3917,8063 =3918 mmSpeed=(RPM/Ratio) x (pitch/c) x (1-
s/100)= [(1000/0.5) x (1237/1) x (1-0/100)Assume Ratio=1/2; gear
ratio(c)=1;slip=0=762636 x 60/10
The propeller is modeled by using SOLID WORKS. To model a propeller, it
may be necessary to havesections of the propeller at different radii. With
respect the pitch angles these sections are consideredand rotate. Then all
rotated sections are executed onto right circular cylinders with respective
to radii.Strong displaying (or demonstrating) is a steady
arrangement of standards for numerical and PCdemonstrating of 3D
solids. Strong demonstrating is recognized from related ranges of
geometricdisplaying and PC representation by its accentuation on physical
fidelity. Together, the standards ofgeometric and strong displaying shape
the establishment of PC helped configuration and when all issaid in done
backing the creation, trade, perception, activity, examination, and
annotation ofcomputerized models of physical items

Meshing of Propeller Blade

The meshing process is using Ansys mesh CFD Fluent with face sizing
method. The element size is 40mm with maximum face size is 80 mm,
minimum face size is 1.453 mm, fine relevance center,curvature size
function, and high smoothing for quality setting. Setting the relevance
center from coarseto fine and quality setting from medium to high is to
make the calculating process more accurate and thegraphic can show a
better curve.

Setting Up Condition

This process use Ansys Fluid Flow (Fluent) feature with double precision
and serial processing. Applying pressure based type, absolute velocity,
steady time and -9.81 m/s2 of gravitaional acceleration for general setting.
The models for this propeller setting up is using viscous model with k-
epsilon (2 eqn) standard wall functions model. The cell zone condition for
rotating part applying mesh motion with 4000 rpm rotational velocity for
the propeller and adjust the operating density for static part in 1.225
kg/m3
REFERENCES

[1] Aditya Kolakoti, “CFD analysis of controllable pitch propeller used in marine vehicle” Vol 2
2013.

[2] Chiharu Kawakita, “CFD on Cavitation around Marine Propellers with Energy-Saving
Devices”Vol 49 2012

.[3] J. H. Seo, “Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of marine resistance and
propulsionperformance” 2010

[4] Stefano Gaggero, “EFD and CFD Design and Analysis of a Propeller in Decelerating Duct”
2012.

[5] Stefano Gaggero, “Parametric CFD optimization of fast marine propellers” 2009.

[6] J. H. Lee, “Computational and Experimental Analysis for Horizontal Axis Marine Current
Turbine Design” Vol 2 2011

.[7] Giulio Dubbioso,“ Simulation Of Steady And Unsteady Cavitation On A Marine Propeller
Using ARans Cfd Code” 2015.

[8] Mario Felli, “Numerical and experimental analysis of the wake behavior of a generic
submarine propeller” 2009.

[9] Giulio Dubbioso,“CFD Analysis of Propeller-Rudder Interaction” 2015

[10] S. Subhas, “CFD Analysis of a Propeller Flow and Cavitation” Vol 2 2013.

[11] Pritam Majumder,“Design and Analysis of a Propeller Blade for Underwater Vehicle” 2016

[12] Spyros A. Kinnas, “Modeling of Unsteady Sheet Cavitation on Marine Propeller Blades”
2003

[13] Francesco Salvatore, “Computational analysis of marine propeller performance and

cavitation byusing an inviscid-flow BEM model” 2011

.[14] Hanshin Seol, “Numerical Analysis of Underwater Propeller Noise” 2002

.[15] L. X. Hou,“Spatial Fluctuating Pressure Calculation of Underwater Counter Rotating

Propellers under Noncavitating Condition” 2018

[16] Yue Tan,“Improved Performance Prediction of Marine Propeller: Numerical Investigation

and Experimental Verification” 2019

[17] Ahmed Bougamra, “Multiphase CFD Simulation of Solid Propellant Combustion in a Small
GunChamber” 2014

[18] Pei Xu,“Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Ice Blockage on Propeller Hydrodynamic
Performance”

[19] Daniele Berletta,“EFD and CFD Characterization of a CLT Propeller” 2012

[20] Michael R. Motley,“Scaling of the Transient Hydroelastic Response and Failure Mechanisms
of Self-Adaptive Composite Marine Propellers” 2012