miss descriptions in the records or books of accounts by the books keepers. In other words, they are unintentional mistakes arising on account of negligence or ignorance. Errors are generally innocent. Examples of errors include- errors in gathering data (say Tk 986 of purchase accounted as Tk 896 from purchase bills), errors in making accounting estimates, and errors in application of accounting principles. TYPES OF ERRORS • Errors may be basically of two types: 1) Clerical Errors and 2) Principle Errors. Clerical Errors
• Clerical errors arise on account of negligence of
the accounting staff. They are called technical errors. They are committed in posting, totalling and balancing. Clerical errors may be further divided as ) Errors of omission, ) Errors of Commission, ) Duplicating Errors and ) Compensating Errors. • Errors of omission: Error of omission is one where a transaction has not been recorded in the books of account either fully or partially. If a transaction is fully omitted, then it will be difficult to trace out, as both the debit and the credit are missing and the trial balance will tally in spite of these errors. However if a transaction is partly omitted, then only one aspect of the transaction is recorded. In this case it is easier to locate such an error • Errors of Commission: When a transaction has been recorded but has been wrongly entered in the books of original entry or posted in the ledger, error of commission is said to have been made. Errors of Commission include posting errors, casting errors and totalling errors. For example, a purchase invoice for Tk 1250 was entered in the purchase book as Tk 1520. It is a casting error. • Duplicating Errors: Such errors arise when an entry in a book of original entry has been made twice and has also been posted twice. • Compensating Errors: A compensating error or off-setting error is one which is counter-balanced by any other error or errors. For example, if A’s account was to be debited for Tk 100 but was debited for Tk 10 while B’s account which was to be debited for Tk 10 was debited for Tk 100. Thus, both accounts have been debited for a total sum of Tk 110 which amount ought have been debited. Principle Errors • Principle errors arise generally when the fundamental principles of accountancy are not observed while recording a transaction. For instance, a capital expenditure is recorded as revenue expenditure or assets are valued against the principles of book-keeping or incorrect provisions for doubtful debts and vice versa. Such errors are difficult to detect as the Trial Balance tallies in spite of such errors. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED TO DETECT ERRORS – Check the opening balances from the balance sheet of the last year. – Check the posting into respective ledger accounts – Check the total of the subsidiary books. – Verify all the castings and the carry forwards. – Ensure that the list of debtors and creditors tally with the ledger accounts. – Make sure that all accounts from the ledger are taken into accounts. – Verify the total of the trial balance. – Compare the various items from the trial balance with that of the previous year. – Find out the amount of difference and see whether an item of half or such amount is entered wrongly – Check differences involving round figures as Tk. 1,000; Tk. 100 etc. – See that no entry of the original book has remained unposted. – Ultimately careful scrutiny is the only remedy for detection of errors. FRAUDS • According to the Auditing Standard issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh (ICAB), the term fraud refers to intentional misrepresentation of financial information by one or more individuals among management, employees or third parties. In other words, it is intentional or wilful misrepresentation or deliberate concealed of a material fact with a view to deceive, cheat or mislead another person. Fraud is committed using the method of deception in order to gain an unfair or illegal advantage. TYPES OF FRAUDS I. Manipulation of accounts, II. Misappropriation of cash III. Misappropriation of Goods Manipulation of Accounts • Manipulation of accounts is said to be committed when a person makes a false entry in the books of accounts knowing it to be wrong, alters or destroys a true entry in the business records or prevents the making of a true entry in the business records. • Normally it is done by people at the top management level. It is done to overstate or understate the profits and the financial conditions of the business so as to serve their purpose. This type of fraud is very difficult to discover. • Manipulation may be done in any of the following ways: i. Non provisions of depreciation on fixed assets ii. Overvaluation or undervaluation of assets iii. Recording revenue expenditure as capital expenditure iv. Showing expenses of the next year in the current year’s profit and loss account v. Not recording currents year’s accrued expenses etc. • A common form of manipulation of accounts is known as “window Dressing.” • A company can use window dressing when preparing financial statements to improve the appearance of its performance or liquidity. Generally, window dressing is considered to be an unethical practice because it involves deception and advancement of management’s interests instead of interests of information users (i.e., owners, investors, government). To identify window dressing an auditor should review all financial statements and any additional available information to determine whether: • A positive cash balance is a result of short-term borrowing or non-operating activities (refer to the statement of cash flows to see which activities generated cash) • There is an abnormal increase or decrease in any balances • The company’s policies were changed during the period • Strong sales are accompanied by increases in accounts payable Misappropriation of Cash • Misappropriation of cash is also called embezzlement of cash. It means fraudulent appropriation of cash belonging to another person by one who has been entrusted to it. Misappropriation may take place in the following ways: I. Omitting to enter any cash which has been received. II. Entering fewer amounts than what has been actually received. III. Making fictitious entries on the payment side of cash book. IV. Entering more amounts on the payment side of the cash book than what has been actually paid. Misappropriation of Goods • It refers to fraudulent application of goods by those who handle them. It can be done by recording sales of larger quantities and misappropriating the balance or by recording purchase of large quantities receiving less quantity and then receiving the balance amount privately. • THE AUDITOR CAN SUSPECT FRAUD UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: – When vouchers, invoices, cheques, contracts are missing etc. – When control account does not agree with subsidiary books. – When the difference in trial balance is difficult to locate. – When there are greater fluctuations in Gross profit and Net profit ratios. – When there is difference between the balance and the confirmation of the balance by the parties. – When there is difference between the stock as per records and the stock physically counted. – When the explanation given by the client is not satisfactory. – When there is a overwriting of some figures. – When there is a contradiction in the explanation given by different parties. Auditor’s Duty in respect of Fraud – Examine all aspects of the finance. – Vouch all the receipts from the counterfoils or carbon copies or cash memos, sales reports etc. – Check thoroughly the salary and wages register. – Verify the methods of valuation of stocks. – Check up stock register, goods inwards notes, goods out wards books and delivery challans etc – Calculate various ratios in order to detect fraudulent manipulation of accounts – Go through the details of unusual items. – Probe into the details of the problems when there is a suspicion. – Make surprise visit to check the accounts – Exercise reasonable skill and care while performing the duty. Management’s Responsibility • The responsibility for adopting sound accounting policies, maintaining adequate internal control, and making fair representations in the financial statements rests with management rather than with the auditor. Because they operate the business daily, a company’s management knows more about the company’s transactions and related assets, liabilities, and equity than the auditor does. In contrast, the auditor’s knowledge of these matters and internal control is limited to that acquired during the audit. THANK YOU