Critical journal review

COMPLIED BY:

Name : Anwar Gea

NIM : 182108006

Semester/Class : IV/C

Subject : SYNTAX

Lecturer :

Kristof Martin E.Telaumbanua S.S,M.pd

INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND EDUCATION SCIENCE

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION
ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
2020/2021
 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

IDENTITY OF THE JOURNAL

Title : The analysis of A1 level speaking exam in

terms of syntax: The effect of general
competence on syntax in A1 level speaking
Author :Hulya misir
ISSN : 1305-578x
Published Year :2017
Journal Dimension :first
Vol :13
 CHAPTER II

DISCUSSION

A. ADVANTAGES

 The purpose of writing a journal, the core of writing to improve students'

ability in English syntax is better and faster so that understanding in
speech can be understood and in accordance with existing structures.
 Content, in general, contained in the table of contents and introduction has
been good starting from chapter I to the next chapter can be understood
even though there are certain weaknesses and it is not possible to learn and
understand it well.
 The assessment of the quality of the content is very clear, giving an easy to
understand, starting from the preparation of the sentence and the grammar
in English we can see it starting from the first chapter that makes the
reader very interested to understand more in more detail.

B. DISADVANTAGES

 In abstrack section it is difficult to understand a few sentences because the

theoretical study summarized has not been concluded in detail without a
proper explanation of the main problems of the topic of the journal.
 In the keywords section the correct abstract should be written in two
languages, namely English and Indonesian, but in this section only in one
language.
 In the introduction to the contents of the journal has been complete and
clear it's just that the author still has not applied how to understand some
of the difficult vocabulary interpreted by the reader, so we are confused in
translating and analyzing the exact objectives based on the paper.
 The next weakness in this journal is that there are several evidences of
hypotheses and interrelationships between fields of science, but the
authors have not provided conclusions from the discussion of the contents
of this journal.
 CHAPTER III

CONCLUSSION

Realizing that the author is still far from perfect and the lack of
resources owned by the author in accordance with the criticism of weaknesses of
the journal that has been criticized before that has been verified, it is not possible
to learn by students but also as a highly motivated reader with journal excellence
entitled syntax journal development through literacy with various advantages as
listed above, but defining and constructive suggestions must be accepted by the
author.