APPENDIX 1

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT OF THE PROCESS 2 PRESENTATION

Assessment Equivalen
Criteria Scale 1 2 3 4 5
points t points
Grade /10
point (in 0 point 1/3 1/2 2/3 Full
total)
Criterion 1:
Presentation 5.0
Contents
Criterion 1.1: Not subject to Relevant Be subject to
Appropriateness learning issues albeit the learning
of the topic contents, not included in contents of the
theories of the learning Chapter.
the Chapter. contents, Key
1.0 Key theories of the terms/concepts
terms/concept Chapter. in the title:
s in the title: Key 100%.
<50%. terms/concepts
in the title:
<75%.
Criterion 1.2: Not logically Some parts are Logical,
Well-structured, structured, still not systematic, and
good analysis incoherent in arranged coherent
the whole logically, among parts of
content of the systematically the
1.0 presentation. and presentation.
Rate of coherently. Rate of
coherence: Rate of coherence:
<50% of coherence: <75% of
contents <75% of contents
contents
Criterion 1.3: 1.0 Inaccurate Inaccurate Inaccurate Inaccurate Accurate,
Accuracy, information information information information attractive&
Attractiveness & >=75% of the 50-75% of 20-50% of the : <20% of creativepresent
Creativity entire the entire entire contents the entire ation contents
contents contents contents
Criterion 1.4: Obsolete Obsolete Obsolete Obsolete Most updated
Updated& information information information information information
Applicability and statistics and statistics and statistics and and statistics;
>=10 years; 5-10 years; 3-5 years; statistics 3- Specific
1.0 General and General and General 5 years; applicable
inapplicable inapplicable solutions (not Specific solutions
solutions (not solutions topic-specific) applicable
topic- (not topic- solutions
specific) specific)
Criterion 1.5: Not have a Collect a Creative a Collect a Creative a case
Build a case Well- case case case situation,
situation prepared in situation situation,but situation suitable to the
case situation from other not suitable to from other contents,
source, but the contents, source, theories of the
1.0
not suitable theories of the suitable to chapter.
to the chapter. the
contents, contents,
theories of theories of
the chapter the chapter.
Criterion 2:
Format and 2.0
Demonstration
Criterion 2.1: Typing and Typing and Typing and Typing and Typing and
Typing & spelling spelling spelling spelling spelling
spelling mistakes mistakes mistakes mistakes mistakes found
mistakes 1.0 found in found in 50- found in 20- found in in <10% of
>=75% of the 75% of the 50% of the <20% of the number of
number of number of number of the number slides
slides slides slides of slides
Criterion 2.2: 1.0 Not eye- Relatively Eye-catching
Slides design catching; Too eye-catching; and colorful;
many words Still many Pictures, charts
per slide and words per and tables are
 line; Pictures, slide and line; well formatted;
charts and Pictures, Brief and
tables are not charts and concise
well tables are not contents per
formatted fairly slide
>15 formatted >8 lines/slide
lines/slide >12 lines/slide (Font Arial 22)
(Font Arial (Font Arial
22) 22)
Criterion 3:
Presentation 3.0
skills
Criterion 3.1: Not Less Confident;
Presenter’s skills confident; Be dependent on Dynamic;
dependent on manuscript; Enthusiastic;
manuscript; Still not Critical
1.0 Not fluent in confident and thinking;
English dynamic; Excellent
(100% of the Fair English English
presenters) (50% of the (0% of the
presenters) presenters)
Criterion 3.2: Well- Fairly- Ill-prepared;
Preparation, prepared; prepared; Unclear &
Group work Clear and Some ambiguous
straight- viewpoints viewpoints and
forward and contents contents, bad
viewpoints still need to be group work
1.0
and contents, clarified and (100 % of the
strong group enhanced, contents)
work fairly group
(0% of the work
contents) (50% of the
contents)
Criterion 3.3: 1.0 Ambiguous Acceptable Clear and
Q&A section, answers; Poor answers; straight-
Eloquence interaction; Apply forward
 Do not knowledge to answers;
understand practice; Fair Apply
what have interaction. knowledge to
been (50% of practice; Good
presented by accurate interaction;
his/her own answers; Critical
group <75% thinking;
(0% of students’ (100% of
accurate attention) accurate
answers; answers; 100%
<50% students’
students’ attention)
attention)
Total 10.0 Results (in total)