Group Assignment Rubric: Case Study (5 Marks)

Criteria Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor

Student is able to
Student is unable (0%)
identify and relate the
Student is able to relate to relate any business
best alternatives of all Student is able to relate Student is able to relate
75% of business analysis analysis techniques,
Decision-making and business analysis 50% of business analysis 25% of business analysis
techniques, tools, and tools, and strategies
Data interpretation techniques, tools, and techniques, tools, and techniques, tools, and
strategies that are /the techniques and
Skill (Q1+Q2) strategies that reflect strategies for a given strategies for a given
appropriate for a given tools are either
100% in-depth context. context.
context. inappropriate for task or
understanding of the
are not well applied.
problem.
(2Mark) (2 Mark) (1.5 Mark) (1 Mark) (0.5 Mark) (0 Mark)
Student is able to fully
analyze (100%) current
business trends by
thinking critically in
order to improve Student is able to critically
Student is able to
business practices and analyze 75% of business Student is able to analyze Student fails (0%) in
Critical analyze 50% of business
operations. They are trends in detail, and 25% of business trends analyzing business
Analysis/Thinking (Q3) trends with appropriate
also able to justify their provide justification for with poor justification. trends.
justification.
analysis with their analysis.
appropriate sources,
and analyze the
implications of the
solution/analysis.
(1 Mark) (1 Mark) (0.75 Mark) (0.5 Mark) (0.25 Mark) (0 Mark)
Developing Solutions Student is able to Student is able to analyze Student is able to apply Student is able to apply Student is unable (0%)
(Q4) demonstrate 100% 75% of the situation, and 50% traditional appropriate theory to to analyze the problem,
clear understanding of articulate clear multiple approaches to problem data up to 25%, with and make no attempt to
main problem. Student solution/analysis for the solving. many errors due to relate data to theory.
uses multiple problem, provide a logical misinterpretation of
 Group Assignment Rubric: Case Study (5 Marks)

appropriate problem-
solving strategies and
applies them/uses
creative approaches to interpretation of the
problem solving. The findings and justifications theory/model.
analysis is thorough, for the solution.
and interprets data
carefully using
appropriate theory.
(1 Mark) (1 Mark) (0.75 Mark) (0.5 Mark) (0.25 Mark) (0 Mark)
Mechanics Excellent grammar, Adequate grammar, A few mistakes in Many mistakes in Grammar, spelling,
Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, spelling, punctuation, grammar, spelling, grammar, spelling, punctuation,
spelling, punctuation, professional writing, professional writing, and punctuation, punctuation, professional professional writing, and
3rd person objective and syntax. Sentence syntax. Sentence structure professional writing, writing, and syntax. syntax needs significant
view, professional structure shows is appropriate. and syntax. Sentence Sentence structure needs improvement
writing, and syntax. sophistication. structure could be improvement
improved.
(0.5 Mark) (0.5 Mark) (0.38 Mark) (0.25 Mark) (0.12 Mark) (0 Mark)
Format All text is clear and All text is clear and Text is clear and Some text are clear and Text are not clear and
Font: Times New readable, no changes in readable, a few changes in readable, a some readable, frequent readable, frequent
Roman, size 12, Line size and spacing. size and spacing. Colour changes in size and changes in size and colour changes in size and
Space 1.5 and one-inch Colour enhance enhance understanding colour enhance do not enhance spacing. Colour do not
margins, cover page, understanding understanding understanding enhance understanding
page numbers
(0.5 Mark) (0.5 Mark) (0.38 Mark) (0.25 Mark) (0.12 Mark) (0 Mark)
Total Mark 5 marks