Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dyadic (ორი ელემენტისგან შემდგარი) refers to the individualized relationship between a leader
and each follower in a work unit.
Dyadic Theory is an approach to leadership that attempts to explain why leaders vary their behavior
with different followers.
Dyadic theorists focus on the development and effects of separate dyadic relationships between leaders
and followers.
> Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory examines how leaders form one-on-one relationships with followers,
and how these often create, in-groups and out-groups within the leader’s work unit.
In-group includes followers with strong social ties to their leader ina a supportive relationship
characterized by high mutual trust, respect, loyalty, and influence.
Out-group influences followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task-centered
relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down influence.
Characteristics of In-group:
Characteristics of Out-group:
It assumes that leaders have limited amount of social, personal, and organizational resources, and tend
to distribute them among followers selectively. Leaders do not interact with all followers equally, which
ultimately results in the formation of LMXs that vary in quality.
Less support
More formal supervision
Little or no involvement in decision making
Involves a primary concern to motivate a group of individuals to work together to achieve a common
objective, while alleviating any conflicts or obstacles that may arise while striving toward that objective.
The emphasis is on forming relationships with all group members, not just with a few special individuals.
Each person must perceive that he or she is an important and respected member of the team rather
than a non-entity.
Workplace social exchanges between individual employees, work groups, and managers are critical to
team building.
There is a noticeable trend of organizations seeking and getting involved in a variety of collaborative
agreements for the purposes of entering new markets and gaining innovations or new products.
By collaborating, organizations hope to exchange strengths with others, which will allow all partners to
develop timely, innovative, synergistic solutions to complex problems they could not address on their
own.
From a network perspective, the focus is on relations among actors, whether they are individuals, work
units, or organizations, who are embedded within networks of interconnected relationships that provide
opportunities and constraints on behavior.
A systems-oriented prospective focuses on how the quality of the LMX relationship affects followers at
the interpersonal, group, and organizational levels.
Proponents of the systems and networks view contend that leader relationships are not limited to
followers, but include peers, customers, suppliers, and other relevant stakeholders in the collectives of
workgroups and organization-wide networks.
To be effective, groups need to manage ―boundaryspanning‖ relationships with other groups and
external members in their organization in order to gain access to information and resources.
Leaders form high-quality social exchanges (based on trust and liking) with some members and low-
quality economic exchanges with others that do not extend beyond the employment contract. The
quality of LMX affects employees’ work ethics, productivity, satisfaction, and perceptions.
There is a sense among followers in the exchange relationship to reciprocate their leader’s trust and
liking through ―citizenship behaviors‖ and excellent performance.
The special relationship with in-group followers creates certain obligations and constraints for the
leader. To maintain the relationship, the leader must:
The followers are therefore said to have developed social capital – The set of resources that inheres in
the structure of relations between members of the group, which helps them get ahead.
The basis for establishing a deeper exchange relationship with in-group members is the leader’s control
over outcomes that are desirable to the followers, which include:
To the leader this also represents social capital that gives him or her power and influence over followers.
Unless this cycle of behavior is interrupted, the relationship is likely to develop to a point where there is
a high degree of mutual dependence, support, and loyalty.
> The Three-Stage Process for Developing Positive LMX Relations
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Followers’ attributes
Proactive followers:
– Show initiative even in areas outside their immediate responsibility
– Possess a strong sense of commitment to work unit goals
– Show a stronger sense of responsibility for unit success
Situational Factors
Refer to random or planned events that provide the opportunity for leaders to evaluate a
follower’s work ethic or character
“Tryouts” (or “role episodes”)
– Give leaders clues about employees
Alienated followers
Are low on involvement yet are high on critical thinking
Feel cheated or unappreciated
Are capable but unwilling to participate in developing solutions to problems
Conformist followers
Are the ―yes‖ people of the organization
Carry out all orders without considering the consequences
Avoid conflict
Passive followers
Are neither high on critical thinking nor involvement
Look to the leader or others to do all the thinking
Require constant supervision
Never go beyond the job description
Effective followers
Are high on critical thinking and involvement
Are not risk-averse nor do they shy from conflict
Have the courage to initiate change
Serve the best interest of the organization
Tend to function very well in self-managed teams
Complement the leader’s efforts and can be relied upon the relieve the leader of many tasks
Pragmatic Followers
Exhibit a little of all four styles—depending on which style fits the prevailing situation
Present an ambiguous image, with positive and negative sides
– On the positive side, when an organization is going through desperate times, the pragmatic
follower knows how to “work the system to get things done”
– On the negative side, this same behavior can be interpreted as “playing political games,” or
adjusting to maximize self-interest
> Guidelines to Becoming an Effective Follower
Leaders need to realize that they are no longer the sole possessors of power and influence in their
work units
Some followers may have personal, referent, expert, information, and connection-based sources of
power that can be used to boost upward influence
As more and more employees come to rely on a particular follower for information, expertise, or
simply because of his or her personality, the follower’s relative power position increases
Followers with an internal locus of control prefer a work environment that facilitates:
Followers with an internal locus of control are more likely to be more influential with other followers
than those with an external locus of control
Followers with less education and experience need more guidance, coaching, and feedback
To improve their performance, inexperienced employees often seek the assistance of experienced
employees
The need for continuing education and training on the job is increasing
Leaders have to shift away from the top-down directive style of leading where tasks are highly
structured and power tends to be centralized
They need to move toward a more decentralized, participative style of managing
> Delegation
Is the process of assigning the responsibility and authority for accomplishing objectives
Refers to giving employees new tasks
Success depends on a manager’s ability to know what to delegate and what not to delegate
The leader should consider the following factors when delegating:
Task
Time required
Follower characteristics
Benefits of Delegation
> What to Delegate: Paperwork, Routine tasks, Technical matters, Tasks with developmental potential,
Solving employees’ problems.
> What Not to Delegate: Personnel matters, Confidential activities, Activities delegated to you
personally, Crises.
Step 1 Explain the need for delegating and the reasons for selecting the employee.
Step 2 Set objectives that define responsibility, level of authority, and deadline.
Step 3 Develop a plan.
Step 4 Establish control checkpoints and hold employees accountable.
Team Leadership & Self-Managed Teams [Chapter 8]
> Groups vs. Teams: What’s the difference?
Group: Team:
Advantages – synergy; avoidance of major errors; faster, better decisions; continuous improvement;
innovation; self-motivation; empowerment; greater job satisfaction; needs fulfillment.
Disadvantages – Pressure to conform to group standards of performance and conduct; Resistance to the
team effort from impinging on autonomy; Social loafing; Groupthink; Intergroup conflicts; High levels of
pressure and stress .
Individual-level performance appraisal helps reduce social loafing, but risks jeopardizing team
interaction and synergy.
> Groupthink
Is when members of a cohesive group tend to agree on a decision not on the basis of its merit but
because they are less willing to risk rejection for questioning a majority viewpoint or presenting a
dissenting opinion;
Task performance: Is the degree to which the team’s output meets the needs and expectations of those
who use it
Group process: Is the degree to which members interact or relate that allow the team to work
increasingly well together over time.
Individual satisfaction: Is the degree to which the group experience, on balance, is more satisfying than
frustrating to team members.
Team norms
Team leadership
Team cohesiveness and interdependence
Team composition
Team structure
Organizational support
Team creativity
Team cohesion is the extent to which team members band together and remain committed to
achieving team goals
Highly cohesive teams have high group potency (the collective belief of a group that it can be effective)
and a strong selfefficacy (an internal belief held by an individual or group about how well and impending
situation can be handled)
Team cohesion is increased when:
Team members agree on common purpose and direction
External parties give high praise and recognition for the team’s success
The organization encourages and motivates teams to compete with each other for rewards
Members find they have common ground and similar attitudes and values
Members enjoy being on the team