You are on page 1of 4

Lesson Plan

Discipline: Critical thinking and writing


Teacher’s name: Rakhimbaeva B.T. Date:
Group: PA-32 SS’ number: 9 Time: (40 mins)
25/30.11./2.12.21
Theme: Understanding cognitive bias

Lesson aims
Main aim: To introduce SS the idea of cognitive bias.
To help SS see the difference between four types of cognitive bias
To give SS practice of thinking critically in using the strength of positive or negative emotional reactions
To consider the ways of when to trust heuristics and when to distrust them
To analyze the effects of confirmation bias
Subsidiary aim(s):To give SS practice of thinking critically in carrying out the assignments
Personal aims:
To give clear instructions
To manage timing

Class profile (strengths, weaknesses, interests, learning preferences, etc.) Materials (Including copyright)
Critical thinking: Your guide to effective argument, successful analysis &
independent study. Tom Chatfield. SAGE Publications inc. 2017. p. 197-215

Anticipated problems Proposed solutions


SS may not know the terms Give definitions /Encourage SS to use dictionary

Whiteboard plan
Lesson Plan

1 Why we spend most of the time using short cuts in our thinking
2 Four everyday short cuts used in thinking
3 What we mean by a cognitive bias
4 Common types of cognitive bias and how they affect our judgement
5 Why people are bad judges of their own expertise

Stage, Aim & Time Suggested procedures Interaction patterns * Notes

Stage 1 Greeting  T introduces the theme T


 T talks about the objectives and outcomes
of the learning unit
Aim: to provide SS with the unit
information
To establish rapport with students

Time (minutes): 5 mins


Stage 2 Lead-in  T asks SS to work in pairs and brainstorm T-SS
the associations to the word “bias”,
‘heuristics’ S-S
Aim: to get SS into the topic.  SS work in pairs T-SS
To generate SS interest in the  Feedback: whole class feedback SS-T
lesson  SS tell the teacher their associations
 T writes them on the board

Time (minutes): 3 mins


Stage 3 Pre-reading discussion  T presents “heuristic=cognitive” and asks SS T-SS
to discuss in pairs how far they agree with
the statement.
Aim: to help SS establish the  SS discuss. T monitors discussions. S-S
difference between two terms.  Feedback: whole class feedback SS-T
 SS share their ideas. T comments on them.

Time (minutes): 3 mins


Lesson Plan
Stage 4 Reading for gist  T asks SS to discuss their answers in pairs. Smart studies
 SS discuss in pairs. T monitors discussions.
 Feedback: whole class feedback
Aim: to provide SS with the  T nominates 2 students to answer
context.

Time (minutes): 5 mins


Stage 5 Presentation  SS discuss in pairs. T monitors discussions.
 Feedback: whole class feedback
 T dictates the definition of four types of
Aim: cognitive bias

Time (minutes): 9 mins


Stage 6 Practice 1  SS work individually
 T asks SS to compare their ideas with peers.
 SS discuss in pairs. T monitors discussions.
Aim: to introduce the word  Feedback: whole class feedback
“cognitive bias”
To provide students with practice
of critical thinking

Time (minutes): 7 mins


Stage 6 Practice 2  T introduces the term “Stereotype”
 T asks SS to grasp a situation as objectively
as possible.
Aim: to introduce the word  SS work in pairs. T monitors.
“stereotype”  Feedback: whole class feedback – SS share
To provide students with practice their ideas
of critical thinking  T asks SS questions:
 Can a person be entirely objective or
entirely sceptic? (No)
Lesson Plan

Time (minutes): 5 mins


Stage 7 Follow-up T asks SS to think about four questions they
may ask themselves when they need to think
twice.
Aim: To summarise the studied SS work in pairs. T monitors the discussion.
material Feedback: whole class feedback.
To provide students with peer SS share their ideas
discussions. T concludes the lesson with 4 questions for
becoming a better sceptic.

Time (minutes): 3 mins


* Individual work: IW (S) Pair work: PW (S-S)Group work: GW(Ss-Ss)Open class: OC(T-Ss; Ss-T; S-Ss)

You might also like