Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 2 - Colorscope Case Study - Solution
Group 2 - Colorscope Case Study - Solution
MBA(2021-23), Section-D
Group 2
Shreyas Bhoite (M404-21)
Arindam Mandal (M335-21)
Aryanika (M337-21)
Moinak Ghosh (M369-21)
Submitted to:
Professor. Kamran Quddus
30th October 2021
Case Summary
Colorscope Inc., founded by Andrew Cha in March 1976, is a graphic arts firm situated in
southern California specializing in special effects photography and pre-press processing.
Because of the strong ties Andrew Cha had created with significant participants in the
marketplace and the company's industry-renowned efficient operating method, the company's
service was regarded as an excellent service provider.
Colorscope witnessed a massive upheaval in the business landscape in the late 1980s due to a
technical revolution in the microcomputer industry. With the backward integration of huge
printing businesses and the closer relationship of standalone pre-press companies with their
clients, the competition got fiercer overnight. Clients bringing up in-house design and pre-
press procedures also caused 1Cha's "strong business relationships" to disintegrate.
Because desktop computers and color separation software were widely available by the mid-
1990s, the price of specific projects dropped by more than 50%, and Cha, who was already
facing severe competition out of nowhere, had to suffer a loss of profits as a result of the
willingness to pay and high production costs incurred due to his ostensibly "technologically
advanced" production equipment and high direct labor expenses. In brief, many difficulties
drove Andrew Cha to question what he could do to reduce operating costs, design a better
pricing strategy to expand Colorscope's customer base, and what type of accounting and
control system he should use.
2
How could Colorscope improve its operations?
3
How could it change its pricing strategy?
Colorscope quoted roughly the same per-page price for different customers plus additional
charges for special effects despite customers posing other demands on organizational
resources, which was not correctly reflected in the price charged. While charging overheads
to jobs, costs incurred at every process must be accounted for and set accordingly per the
activity responsible for the cost. To accommodate such a costing mechanism, Colorscope
could have opted for activity-based costing methods where the overheads are allocated as per
their respective cost drivers between every process.
Colorscope should allocate the overheads to all the cost pools (5 departments) and then to the
respective jobs using appropriate cost-drivers. The company already tracks material, Wages,
and depreciation expenses for the individual processes. For rent expenses (Ex. 11), floor
space would be a suitable cost driver, and hence rent can be assigned to the various methods
in the ratio of floor space. Since wages are a prominent part of the cost, 'Other overheads' can
be allocated according to the labor hours (Ex. 9). Next, we give prices from the overhead cost
pools to each job using labor hours, which seems reasonable as labor costs exceed any other
cost. Hence, we can calculate overhead rates for each process. Finally, after allocating
reasonable expenses to the specific jobs, Colorscope can charge a margin on top of it. For
rework requested by the customer, the firm can charge a premium rate which could be
conveyed to the consumer initially.
Finally, to calculate profitability for each job:
Revenue – Direct Costs – Allocated Overheads = Margin.
4
What accounting and control system should the company install?
Activity-based costing can be used as an accounting system to determine the base price of
each task performed by comparing the work to the cost consumed by each process. Therefore,
each function is evaluated in terms of its performance and the cost used.
Control systems must be in place to ensure proper and smooth operation at all stages of the
production process.
The Colorscope workflow is well standardized but undocumented. It must be documented
and communicated at all levels of the production process. Therefore, it makes no sense to
deviate from the standard procedure.
We also need to send the customer's specifications to each manufacturing process to match
the work completed at each step. This minimizes the possibility of redoing.
All employees are comprehensively trained and can perform activities throughout the process
without additional training, so tasks must go through a quality control process at each stage
before moving on to the next step. This helps minimize the redo suggested by the quality
control department in the final stages. Supervisory controls should be applied at all stages of
the process as part of the internal control system to review the processes connected with
individual performance and job completion and take corrective action based on their
oversight.