Criteria

Cost Comfort Safety

Cost 1 7 3
Comfort 0.142857143 1 0.333333333
Safety 0.333333333 3 1
Total 1.476190476 11 4.333333333

Normalized Matrix

Cost Comfort Safety Priority

Cost 0.677419355 0.636363636 0.692307692 2.006090684 0.668696895
Comfort 0.096774194 0.090909091 0.076923077 0.264606361 0.08820212
Safety 0.225806452 0.272727273 0.230769231 0.729302955 0.243100985
1 1 1 3

Cost Comfort Safety Priority

Cost 1 7 3 0.668696895
Comfort 0.142857143 1 0.333333333 0.08820212
Safety 0.333333333 3 1 0.243100985

Car
Cost Cost Car1 Car2
Car1 1 7
Car2 0.142857143 1
Total 1.142857143 8

Normalized MaCost Car1 Car2 Total Priority

Car1 0.875 0.875 1.75 0.875 1
Car2 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.125 2
Total 1 1 2

Comfort Comfort Car1 Car2

Car1 1 0.2
Car2 5 1
Total 6 1.2

Normalized MaComfort Car1 Car2 Total Priority

 Car1 0.166666667 0.166666667 0.333333333 0.166666667 2
Car2 0.833333333 0.833333333 1.666666667 0.833333333 1
Total 1 1 2

Safety Safety Car1 Car2

Car1 1 0.111111111
Car2 9 1
Total 10 1.111111111

Normalized MaSafety Car1 Car2 Total Priority

Car1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 2
Car2 0.9 0.9 1.8 0.9 1
Total 1 1 2

Model Synthesis
Priority
Car Cost Comfort Safety Cost 0.668696895
Car 1 0.875 0.166666667 0.1 Comfort 0.08820212
Car 2 0.125 0.833333333 0.9 Safety 0.243100985

Your Option Buy Car 1 or Car 2?

Car1 0.6241202346
Car2 0.375879765
Rank
1
3
2

Hasil Kali Hasil Kali/Priority Lamda Max CI RI CR

2.015414693 3.013943551108
0.26476391 3.001786221735
0.730606311 3.005361377462
3.007030383 0.003515192 0.58 0.00606
In AHP, the consistency ratio is defined as CR where CR = CI/RI.
Saaty (2012) has shown that a consistency ratio (CR) of 0.10 or
less is acceptable to continue the AHP analysis. If the consistency
ratio is greater than 0.10, it is necessary to revise the judgments to
locate the cause of the inconsistency and correct it.