Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER TWO
Objectives of the Chapter: After the end of this chapter, students should be able to:
Recap ;
Scientific research is performing a methodical study in order to prove a hypothesis or answer a specific
question. Research must be systematic and follow a series of steps and a rigid standard protocol. These
rules are broadly similar but may vary slightly between the different fields of science. Besides, a
scientific research must be organized and undergo planning, including performing literature reviews of
past research and evaluating what questions need to be answered. The first step of scientific research is
preparing a research proposal. Thus, this chapter will introduce you the meaning and elements of research
proposal.
Getting a good idea hinges on familiarity with the topic. This assumes a longer preparatory period of
reading, observation, discussion, and incubation. Read everything that you can in your area of interest.
Figure out what are the important and missing parts of our understanding. Figure out how to
build/discover those pieces. Live and breath the topic. Talk about it with anyone who is interested. Then
A. RESEARCH TITLE
I. A research Title:
Is the topic of a research that represent the overall contents of a research project? It states what is to be
researched. A title should be well studied, and to give a definite and concise indication of what is to
come. The title of your research proposal should state your topic exactly in the smallest possible number
of words. It must be narrow and focused enough to be interesting, yet broad enough to find adequate
information. All words in the title should be chosen with great care, and association with one another
must be careful y managed.
Research topic should be focused, informative and not more than 20 words A good title is defined as the
fewest possible words that adequately describe the contents of the study. Title is not a sentence. It should
be short, precise. Titles should almost never contain abbreviations. The title page has no page number
and it is not counted in any page numbering. The title should be clear, not vague or redundant
It must be interesting: Most students go into research with the intention of just getting the
project over . This is a very wrong attitude to enter into a careful endeavor like research. A wrong
attitude will inevitably lead to abandoning the research work half way. Hence, it is advised
that the research topic chosen by the student must be interesting to the student first and then to
other people that will read it.
It must contribute or add to knowledge: Apart from the interest of the researcher, the topic
must be able to add to knowledge. If a research is interesting but does not have
substance, the research will not be good-no need of being engaged with it. Most students tend to
repeat the information that has already been researched on, worse still most enter into an area that
has been over flogged, and hence, there is this inability for the research to contribute anything to
existing knowledge other than what has been there from the outset.
It must be within the ability of the researcher to carry it out: One interesting observation is that
students tend to engage in projects that they cannot carry out and as a result, abandon them most
times half way. It is advised that the researcher in choosing a research topic must be able to
show flexibility and competence to carry out the research in the allotted time.
Is the first page of a research proposal. Title page is crucial to affect the clarity of the research
proposal and the impression of the reader. Hence, it should be well written. This page should not be
paginated/should not be given page numbers. The title page should include the following in elements:
B. APPROVAL PAGE
C. TABLE OF CONTENTS
D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This begins on a separate page, should and not exceeding 200 words. This section gives the student
the opportunity to thank his/her advisor/s for their due support in preparing and finalizing his/her proposal
and research theses. Also to express his gratitude to his/her family, friends, and others who have been
helpful in the preparation of the Theses.
E. ABSTRACT
Abstract is the short summary of your research report or proposal, It is generally written last after
finalizing the research. Yet, you can write at the proposal stage, if your advisors recommends to do so. In
any of the cases, abstract should be: concise summary (not exceeding 200 words), single-spaced; not
indented.
The background also should address provide sufficient background information to allow the reader to
understand the contexts of the question you are trying to address. It should be focused on the research
Page | 4 TRAINING ON RESEARCH METHODS FOR WSU PG STUDENTS By Wondimu Tegegne(PhD)
Introduction to Research Methods November 2017, Wolaita Soddo
question(s). It should mention the contributions of the scholars in connection with the study. The
background states what the proposal is generally intended to do at the end of the background. The
background to the study provides a gradual stepping stone to the understanding of the research
problem.
The background to the study section explains the topic in various ways. For instance, it gives the
general meaning of the terms used in the topic conceptually, dictionary definition is at times used
and definitions by other authors are also applied to arrive at a proper definition. Besides, it may
provide critical explanations on the historical development of the issue to be investigated in the study.
This is usually done in a chronological order and general to specific to general or vice versa.
The problem statement describes the central issue of the paper and persuades the reader to continue
reading the paper .
Research problem refer to the major reasons that motivate the research.
Problems are stated in research works to guide the researcher in the problem that he/she is to
solve.
These points to the fact that for a problem to be solved, it must be researchable.
For a research problem to be researchable, it must have theoretical and practical significance.
Page | 5 TRAINING ON RESEARCH METHODS FOR WSU PG STUDENTS By Wondimu Tegegne(PhD)
Introduction to Research Methods November 2017, Wolaita Soddo
The need for a study must be logically stated and clearly articulated at the proposal stage.
It should clearly answer “WHY THE STUDY IS WORTH RESEARCHING?” If not, your proposal
will not be approved and you will not get fund for its implementation . This leads to the rejection of
the pro.
It must contribute to the increase of knowledge and improvement of prevailing situation
Since Research Questions/objectives overlap, some scholars /institutions/researchers use the two
interchangeably. Others use both research questions and objectives. When the two are used in the same
research, they are direct replica of one another in the issues they are concerned with and number. The
remaining use one of the two in their research proposal or research report. Hence, it is necessary to
follow the guideline provided by your own institution. For clarity the two are briefly considered.
There are two major aspects of the objectives of the study. The first aspect is the general objective,
while the second is the specific objective.
o General objective; is the general statements specifying the desired purpose of the proposed project. It
Is derived from the title of a research. Almost similar with a title.
B. Specific Objectives
Page | 6 TRAINING ON RESEARCH METHODS FOR WSU PG STUDENTS By Wondimu Tegegne(PhD)
Introduction to Research Methods November 2017, Wolaita Soddo
o Is derived from the general Objective of the study. See the Example given
o It identifies in greater detail the specific aims of the research project, often breaking down what is to
be accomplished into smaller logical components Specific objectives should systematically address the
various aspects of the problem as defined under ‘ Statement of the Problem’ and the key factors that are
assumed to influence or cause the problem. To have good objectives, you are advised to start each
objective with a verb especially ones that are transitive in nature for instance, To identify …; To
assess, To describe, To assess, To provide…; To uncover...; To explain…; To inform…; To define…; To
evaluate; To appraise…; To find out….
Objectives of the study should be SMART. It is also important to note that the research objective directly
follows the research problem because it specifies in bullet points the issues to be studied. Properly
formulated objectives will facilitate the development of your research methodology and will help to orient
the collection, analysis, interpretation and utilization of data. Remember Mind map a Research –that
shows the connection between Objective, Data source/Participants, methods of data collection and
analysis. If the objectives have not been spelled out clearly, it is difficult to undertake the study.
Why should research objectives be developed? The formulation of objectives will help you to:
Research questions are questions that we seek to provide answers to as a result of the research we are
embarking on. Research questions naturally come in question forms. Research question follows
directly from the objectives of the study and statement of the problem. In some researches research
questions are presented as part of the statement of the problem. That is, after describing the problematic
issue or indicating research gap, some researchers state that “the study is designed to answer the
following specific research questions” It specially state the issues presented in statement of the
problem in the form of questions.
Scope or delimitation of the study is a part of a proposal that shows the boundary of your research . It
shows what the research is concerned with or not concerned with. Scope states the demarcation of your
research concern. Indicate what will be included in or excluded from the study. Scope is usually written
by considering:
Title/topic of the study
Research setting
Participants of the study/Source of data
Time/year when the data is collected and research is conducted.
It is assumed that the researcher while reading literatures adjusts the focus of the research and
possibly modifies the questions the research is set to answer. The researcher in the process of
reviewing literature is also expected to note ‘gaps’ in the studies and try to fill such gaps.
The main core of the process is to critically examine the basic ideas already established or
researched on in an area. It is important also to look at the strengths and weaknesses of such
studies focusing on the research problems and objectives. Hence, the researcher is expected to
put the outcome of the review of literature into a coherent whole pointing out their strengths
and weaknesses, shed light on controversial areas and take a position as to what area of
departure should be with regards to further research.
Literature review is not a compilation of every work written about a topic. It is not simply a list of
sources reviewed separately for their own merit. It is important to note that the process of
literature review is not aimed at presenting summaries of irrelevant researches but at identifying
relevant and useful ones and appraising their strengths and weaknesses and taking a position
whether the researcher conducted the research well. A literature review gives an overview of :
What is the purpose of a literature review, what function does it serve in research work?
According to Akinade and Owolabi (2009), literature review serves the following functions.
• Most times, novice researchers enter into an area where they do not understand.
• However, literature review helps them have a good grasp of what the area is all about.
• Literature review enlarges their insight into what has been done, theories and general
points of departure with regards to the study.
• Hence it gives the deeper insight and broadens their horizon and equips them with the skill and
knowledge base needed to proceed on the research.
• The knowledge gap refers to areas, which have been unexplored, unresearched, or
uncharted in or avoided by researcher in previous researches. This is done to help the researcher
to make a significant contribution to existing knowledge and not engage in over flogging an
area of research.
• In the process of literature review, the researcher discovers missing links in research and
tries to fill them. This process equips the researcher with information what has been researched
on in that area, what is being researched on and what could be researched on.
• This then informs the researcher on whether to conduct a study replicating what has been
done already or to conduct a new study in the same area. This is important in order to avoid
duplicating of efforts.
•
C. Literature review enables the researcher decides on whether to continue with the research
or not:
The need to review literature to see what has been done and what has not been done.
Once this is done, the researcher decides to either continue with the work or leave the
topic if it has been done better elsewhere.
1. First of all search for relevant materials; To prepare review of related literature, first of all search
for relevant materials Relevant materials will probably comprise a range of media: books (monographs,
text books, reference books);
2. Make Initial appraisal from raw bibliographical data: After you collect the relevant material you
should make Initial appraisal from raw bibliographical data: That is, ask
What are the authors’ credentials? are they experts in the field? are they affiliated with a reputable
organization?
What is the date of publication, is it sufficiently current or will knowledge have moved on?
If a book, is it the latest edition?
Is the publisher a reputable, scholarly publisher?
If it is a journal, is it a scholarly journal peer reviewed
The Initial appraisal from raw bibliographical data will give you clear information about the
relevance and appropriateness of the material to your topic. After you know these info:
5. Take note with all necessary information(Title of a book or an article, authors name, year of publication
,page no etc
3.3.Target Population
Explain the sampling techniques which will be used to obtain the results of the proposed
research: probability, Random, Cluster,etc,.
Highlight and discuss the relevance of these techniques to the proposed research;
Describe how these techniques will be used to carry out the proposed research.
CHAPTER FOUR
Work plan is a schedule, chart or graph that summarizes the different components of a research proposal
and how they will be implemented in a coherent way within a specific time-span.
It may include:
The tasks to be performed;
When and where the tasks will be performed;
Who will perform the tasks and the time each person will spend on them;
It describes the plan of assessing the ongoing progress toward achieving the research objectives;
See the Tentative Time Schedule of certain Study
Activities Duration
Phase One
In a research Proposal budget items need to be explicitly stated . Cost for every budget item should be
quantitatively shown . Typically, a proposal budget reflects direct and indirect costs
References
The reference is the names of authors and books which are used in the preparation of the entire
proposal. You must give references to all the information that you obtain from books, papers in journals,
and other sources. The exact format for depicting references within the body of the text and as well as the
end of the proposal varies from one discipline to another. It is best that you consult with someone who is
familiar with the format in your particular area of research. The information you give in the reference list
must be enough for readers to find the books and papers in a library or a database As a general guideline,
there are certain items that must be included from each source reference. As mentioned above, the exact
format applicable to your particular area of study will be left for you to find out. All the references: in
Text-Citations, must be set in the American Psychological Association (APA) style of referencing.
• the author,
• the year of publication,
• the title, and the edition number if there is one,
• the name of the publisher,
• the page numbers for your reference.
Ex. 1. Wolfram, et al. (2007). Dialects in schools and communities. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associate Publishers.
2. Mekonnen Alemu (2009). The implication of Use of Mother Tongue Versus English as Language of
Instruction for Academic Achievement in Ethiopia. In Brock-Utne,B. and Skattum,I.(Eds). Language
Education in Africa: a Comparative and Transdisciplinary Analysis. UK Cambridge University Press.
Author
Year
Title
Status(unpublished)
City or country
Example; Tekabe Legesse (2010). Analysis of appropriateness and usage of Physics terms in grade seven
and eight students’ textbooks: Focus on Oromo (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). AAU: Addis Ababa.