RESEARCH WRITING

PROGRESS MONITORING KIT

LCBA Research Center

i
 RESEARCH WRITING PROCESS: THE LCBA WAY

This Research Writing Progress Monitoring Kit was designed to guide every researcher as well as
all individuals involved in the research process to guarantee that the vision-mission-objectives of LCBA
Research are carried out in their full extent. As such, the Research Development process in LCBA goes
through the important process: 1. Proposal Phase, 2. Data-Collection and Presentation/Reporting of
Results, and 3. Publication, Dissemination, and Utilization Phase.

During the Proposal Phase, the Proponent fills out a Research Concept Paper to the
Dean/Research Coordinator recommends the Concept Paper for Approval of the Research Director.
The Research Director assigns a research a Research Adviser while the proponent fills out a Research
Gantt Chart (Proposal) in agreement with the Research Adviser. The Research Director assigns a
Research Adviser assigns a Chairman and a Member of the Panel of Evaluators for Proposal
Presentation. After the Dean has assessed the readiness of the researcher, the researcher presents the
proposal. After the proposal presentation, the Chairman, the Member, and the Research Director fill
out a Summary of Research Proposal Suggestions and Recommendations. Likewise, the Panel of
Evaluators accomplishes the Evaluation Rubric for Research Project Proposal. After which, the
Research Ethics and Integrity Board approves the Proposal and Research Director gives his final
approval.

As soon as the Dean and Research Adviser attest to the readiness of the researcher to proceed
to the data-collection, the researcher is asked to accomplish a new Gantt Chart (Final Paper). Then,
the Chief Quantitative Data Analyst assigns a Statistician to assist the Researcher in the quantitative
aspects of the study; while the Chief Qualitative Data Analyst assigns a Qualitative Data Analyst to
assist in processing qualitative data of the study. Once the researcher has gathered, processed, and
analyzed the data, he/she presents the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations as well as
accomplish Evaluation Rubrics for the Final Presentation and the Manuscript.

After the researcher has incorporated all the suggestions and recommendations of the Panel
of Evaluators, the Research Director assigns a Content/Grammar Editor and Format Editor. The
formatted Research project is then recommended for binding. 3 copies of the hardbound Research
project along with three CD’s containing Microsoft Word format of the study are submitted to Research
Center. Based on the quality, novelty, and impact of the Research Project, the Research Director
recommends outstanding research for Institutional Refereed Journal Publication. The Researcher may
also submit his/her paper for peer/blind reviewing for International/National Paper Presentation and
Publication. Publication is deemed by LCBA as one of the most essential components of academic
life, hence, the mantra, “publish or perish.”

ii
 LCBA RESEARCH CENTER
The LCBA Research Center was founded to provide opportunities for our stakeholders from various
departments in their successful pursuit of best practice, academic excellence and professional growth through
policy-relevant research. The Center regularly plans, designs, conducts, coordinates and evaluates mentoring
programs, workshops, seminars and lectures for various clienteles while propagating a dynamic research culture
in LCBA and the society.

LCBA RESEARCH CENTER VISION

The LCBA Research Center envisions itself as the knowledge-generating unit of LCBA for faculty, non-
teaching staff, and student research.

LCBA RESEARCH CENTER MISSION

The LCBA Research Center provides opportunities for faculty, non-teaching staff, and students to actively
participate in research capability-building, productivity, dissemination, and utilization, hence developing
research competency and culture.

LCBA RESEARCH CENTER QUALITY POLICY

The LCBA Research Center is committed to upholding ethical practices and providing quality service to
its stakeholders through persistent enhancement of processes and systems in research.

LCBA RESEARCH CENTER QUALITY OBJECTIVES

The LCBA Research Center encourages faculty, non-teaching staff, and students to conduct research
projects on:

1. the promotion of total human development;

2. innovations in instructional delivery and supervision;
3. value-laden and competency-based education;
4. faculty and student research needs;
5. library needs and approaches that maximize library utilization;
6. determining and addressing staff needs;
7. identifying the feasibility of improving or providing new laboratories and facilities;
8. school plant safety and security;
9. mechanisms contributing to efficiency and effectiveness of administrative systems;
10. the needs of the adopted community for a sustainable and community extension program;
11. Graduate Tracer Studies that may provide guidance to LCBA’s strategic planning efforts; and
12. departmental research priorities and objectives.

iii
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
Foreword ii
LCBA Research Center Vision, Mission, and Objectives iii
Table of Contents iv

RESEARCH WRITING FORMS

Research Form 1: Research Concept Paper 1
Research Form 2: Adviser Appointment 3
Research Form 3: Research Writing Gantt Chart (Proposal Phase) 4
Research Form 4: Research Writing Gantt Chart (Final Phase) 5
Research Form 5: Application for Proposal Presentation 6
Research Form 6: Application for Final Presentation 7
Research Form 7: Assignment as Chairman of the Panel of Evaluators 8
for Proposal Presentation
Research Form 8: Assignment as Member of the Panel of Evaluators 9
for Proposal Presentation
Research Form 8b: Assignment as Member of the Panel of Evaluators 10
for Proposal Presentation
Research Form 9: Assignment as Chairman of the Panel of Evaluators 11
for Final Presentation
Research Form 10: Assignment as Member of the Panel of Evaluators 12
for Final Presentation
Research Form 10b: Assignment as Member of the Panel of Evaluators 13
for Final Presentation
Research Form 11: Chairman’s Summary of Suggestions and 14
Recommendations for Research Proposal
Research Form 12: Panel Member 1 Summary of Suggestions and 16
Recommendations for Research Proposal
Research Form 13: Panel Member 2 Summary of Suggestions and 18
Recommendations for Research Proposal
Research Form 14: Chairman’s Summary of Suggestions and 20
Recommendations for Final Paper
Research Form 15: Panel Member 1 Summary of Suggestions and 21
Recommendations for Final Paper
Research Form 16: Panel Member 2 Summary of Suggestions and 22
Recommendations for Final Paper
Research Form 17: Appointment of Statistician/Qualitative Data 23
Analyst
Research Form 18: Appointment of Content/Grammar Editor 24
Research Form 19: Appointment of Format Editor 25
Research Form 20: Evaluation Rubric for Research Project Proposal 26
(Presentation and Manuscript)
Research Form 21: Evaluation Rubric for Final Presentation and 27
Manuscript
Research Form 22: Research Ethics and Integrity Board Approval 29
Research Form 23: Summary of Suggestions and Recommendations 30
from the Chief Statistician

Research Form 24: Certificate of Dissemination and Utilization 32

Research Form 25: Certificate of Publication 34

iv
RESEARCH WRITING FORMS

v
 RESEARCH FORM 1: CONCEPT PAPER

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAED/2nd Year _____________Date Submitted: May 3, 2021___________
Proposed Titles of the Study
A. THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM_________________________________________________________
Area/s of Study
Role of guidance counselors in promoting mental health in the new normal.
Background of the Study
The study aims to understand the roles of guidance counselor in promoting mental health in the new
normal and discover the different approach and techniques of the Guidance counselor in
promoting mental health awareness. Lastly, the goal of the research is to create a basis for guidance
program on promoting mental health to students in the new normal.
Central Question
What is the essence of the lived experience of guidance counselors in promoting mental health
among learners?
Corollary Questions
1. How do the guidance counselors describe their experiences as promoting mental health among
learners in the new normal?
2. What themes emerge from the testimonies of the guidance counselors?
3. Based on the findings of the study, what guidance program may be proposed?
Objectives of the Study
The primary objective of this study is to look into the lived experience of guidance counselors as they
encounter challenges in their role to promote mental health in the new normal and to know how
they overcome that challenges. Also, to create a basis for guidance program on promoting mental
health to students in the new normal.
Literature Review
We have all needed to adapt to new circumstances in our daily lives because of the COVID-19 outbreak.
That includes everything from commerce to our careers, but we can still support teens and young adults in
managing friendships and relationships, problem solving, decision making, and identifying and managing
emotions in this new paradigm. Guidance counselor should emphasize that students are not alone and provide
guidance and mentorship for anything in their realm of expertise: study skills, time management or handling
anxiety related to new digital learning and communication formats. Faculty members can create virtual drop-
in opportunities during the week for students to discuss problems or concerns around coursework, study,
academic or other challenges (MacPhee, 2020).

According to the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP,
2016), guidance counselors demonstrate the professional knowledge and skills necessary to promote the
academic, career, and personal/social development of all students through data-informed school counseling
programs. Guidance counselors are the leaders, advocates, and change agents within schools that have the
qualities for promoting mental health to students within the school setting.

According to the most recent American School Counselor Association (ASCA, 2016) Ethical Standards for
School Counselors, it is the role of the guidance counselor to conduct program evaluations to determine if
programming is effective and meets the academic, social, and emotional needs of students. An effective
mental health model involves regular monitoring of student and program outcomes to include reviewing
outcome data and analyzing the data to measure gaps, successes, and areas of limitations.

A guidance counselor occupies an important role during the global pandemic. That role is to listen to
students, help students transform their goals into actions and support students’ mental health during
challenging times. As a result of COVID-19, some schools may go in-person, go online and or use a hybrid
version, all three of which present challenges to guidance counselors (St. Bonaventure University, 2020).

The global pandemic has undoubtedly affected the way students approach their education. A
guidance counselor acts as an advocate for students’ well-being and academic advancement. These
professionals have the unique responsibility of paying attention to a student’s experience in school while also
questioning how their experience outside of the classroom influences their education and mental health (Ross,
2020).
Theoretical Framework
To understand and find meaning from the lived experiences of guidance counselors who work
with students to promote mental health in new normal, the researcher will use a hermeneutic

1
 phenomenology approach for this research. Hermeneutic phenomenology is a philosophy used to
understand the lived experiences of a specific group of people.
According to Linda F. Peterson (2019) Phenomenology is also considered an inductive
qualitative approach rich in determining how we understand meaning (Miles, Francis, Chapman &
Taylor, 2013; Reiners, 2012). Hermeneutic phenomenology theory can be used when there is a
research to understand meaning in how others understand and apply sense to their world (Miles et
al., 2013).
The thought behind phenomenology is that reality is not set but is based on the varied realities
of the subjects (Reiners, 2012). This theory will allow the researcher and participants to engage in a
way that will help understand the lived experiences behind the phenomenon occurring when
guidance counselors promote mental health to students in new normal.
Proposed Methodology
Design: Qualitative Research____________________________________________________________________
Approach: Phenomenology_____________________________________________________________________
Locale: Selected schools in Laguna______________________________________________________________
Sampling Technique: Purposeful sampling________________________________________________________
Respondents/Participants: 10 Guidance Counselors in Laguna____________________________________
Delimitations: 10 Guidance Counselors of Junior High School learners in Laguna___________________
Data-Collection Method/s: Semi-structured interview guide_______________________________________
Questionnaire (put a check mark): ______Adopted ________Adapted ___________Researcher-made
Analysis:
First step, the researcher familiarized herself with the data, by reading through all the participant
responses several times. Second step, the study identified all statements in the responses that were
of direct relevance to the phenomenon under investigation. Third step, the study identified meanings
relevant to the phenomenon that arose from a careful consideration of the significant statements.
Forth step, the study clustered the identified meanings into themes that were common across all
responses. Fifth step, the researcher wrote a full and inclusive description of the phenomenon,
incorporating all the themes produced at the forth step. Sixth step, the study condensed the
exhaustive description down to a short, dense statement that captured just those aspects deemed
to be essential to the structure of the phenomenon. And lastly, the researcher returned the
fundamental structure statement to all participants (or sometimes a subsample in larger studies) to
ask whether it captures their experience.

References
John MacPhee (2020). Promoting Student Mental Health in Difficult Days
https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/05/29/advicepromoting-student-mental-
health during-pandemic-opinion
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP, 2016). School
counseling. https://www.cacrep.org/section-5-entry-level-specialty-areas-school-
counseling/
American School Counselor Association (2016). ASCA ethical standards for school counselors.
Retrieved from
https://www.schoolcounselor.org/asca/media/asca/Ethics/EthicalStandards2016.pdf
St. Bonaventure University (2020). School Counselor: What Does the Future Hold?
https://online.sbu.edu/news/school-counselor
Laura Ross (2020). The Role of a School Counselor during COVID-19
https://online.sbu.edu/news/school-counselor

Prepared by:

Jonila Joys M. Cinco _______________________________

Principal Investigator/Proponent Co-Author/Proponent
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Recommending Approval: Noted and Approved:

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd_______ MA. LORENA M. TAGALA, LPT.EdD

Department Head/ Dean/Principal Research Director
(Signature over printed name)

2
 RESEARCH FORM 2: ADVISER APPOINTMENT

TO : Shella R. Garcia, LPT, RGC

FROM : DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM___________________________________________________________

PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Date Submitted : April 4, 2021_________________________________________________________________

You are hereby appointed as RESEARCH Adviser for Jonila Joys A. Modina.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the researcher in the entire
duration of the study. Likewise, you are requested to submit to the Research Office a signed Gantt
Chart indicating your agreed dates of consultation meetings as attachment to this document.

Thank you.

MA. LORENA M. TAGALA, LPT.EdD

Dean/Research Director

CONFORME:

SHELLA R. GARCIA, LPT, RGC

3
 RESEARCH FORM 3: RESEARCH WRITING GANTT CHART (PROPOSAL PHASE)
ACTIVITIES
WK1 WK2 WK3 WK4 WK5 WK6 WK7 WK8 WK8 WK9 WK10 WK11 WK12 WK13
RESEARCH TEAM
CONFIRMATION
SUBMISSION OF
PROPOSED TITLES
SUBMISSION OF
CONCEPT PAPER
CONCEPT APPROVAL

REVIEW OF RELATED
LITERATURE
INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORK
RESEARCH
PARADIGM
STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM/CENTRAL
QUESTION
HYPOTHESES (IF ANY)

SCOPE AND
DELIMITATIONS
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
STUDY
DEFINITION OF TERMS

RESEARCH DESIGN

RESEARCH LOCALE

POPULATION &
SAMPLING
RESPONDENTS/PARTI-
CIPANTS OF THE
STUDY
INSTRUMENTS AND
VALIDATION
QUESTIONNAIRES

DATA-GATHERING
PROCEDURE
TREATMENT OF
QUANTITATIVE/QUALIT
ATIVE DATA
REFERENCES

APPROVAL OF
PROPOSAL
MANUSCRIPT
APPLICATION FOR
PROPOSAL
PRESENTATION
INVITATION OF
EXAMINEES
REPRODUCTION/
DISTRIBUTION OF
PROPOSAL
MANUSCRIPT
PROPOSAL
PRESENTATION
TURNITIN SIMILARITY
CHECKING
SUBMISSION OF
REVISED PROPOSAL
W/ SUMMARY OF
RECOMMENDATIONS

PREPARED AND AGREED UPON BY:

Jonila Joys M. Cinco SHELLA R. GARCIA, LPT, RGC

Principal Investigator/Proponent Research Adviser
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

NOTED AND APPROVED BY:

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd

Research Director/SGS Dean

4
 RESEARCH FORM 4: RESEARCH WRITING GANTT CHART (FINAL PHASE)
ACTIVITIES
WK1 WK2 WK3 WK4 WK5 WK6 WK7 WK8 WK9 WK10 WK11 WK12 WK13 WK14 WK15
(RE)APPOINTMENT OF
RESEARCH ADVISER
REQUEST FOR
QUANTITATIVE/QUALITATIVE
DATA ANALYSIS
VALIDATION OF
INSTRUMENTS/RELIABILITY TEST
DATA-GATHERING

RETRIEVAL OF
QUESTIONNAIRES
QUANTITATIVE DATA
PROCESSING/INTERPRETATION
QUALITATIVE DATA
PROCESSING/INTERPRETATION
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS

COMPARISON AND
CONTRAST OF FINDINGS WITH
RELATED STUDIES
DRAWING OF CONCLUSIONS

CRAFTING OF
RECOMMENDATIONS
DEVELOPMENT OF OUTPUT (IF
ANY)
COUNTER-CHECKING OF
REFERENCES
COLLECTION OF
CURRICULUM VITAE
APPROVAL OF FINAL PAPER

APPLICATION FOR FINAL

PAPER PRESENTATION
RE-INVITATION OF EXAMINEES

REPRODUCTION &
DISTRIBUTION OF
MANUSCRIPTS
FINAL PAPER PRESENTATION

SUBMISSION OF REVISED FINAL

PAPER WITH SUMMARY OF
RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICATION FOR CONTENT
EDITING
APPLICATION FOR FORMAT
EDITING
SUBMISSION OF FINAL PAPER
TO EXAMINEES FOR
SIGNATURE
BOOKBINDING OF FINAL
PAPER (2 COPIES)
SUBMISSION OF 2 COPIES TO
THE DEAN FOR SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION OF 2 COPIES TO
RESEARCH OFFICE FOR
CLEARANCE & CIRCULATION
APPLICATION TO QUALIFY IN
RESEARCH FORUM AND
PUBLICATION

PREPARED AND AGREED UPON BY:

Jonila Joys M. Cinco SHELLA R. GARCIA, LPT, RGC

Principal Investigator/Proponent Research Adviser
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

NOTED AND APPROVED BY:

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd

Research Director/Dean

5
 RESEARCH FORM 5: APPLICATION FOR PROPOSAL PRESENTATION

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_______________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________

Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________

Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/ 2nd year____ Date Submitted: June 11, 2021

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Laguna College of Business and Arts

Dear Dr. Tagala:

I am respectfully applying for Proposal Presentation of my Research Project entitled, “THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE
COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL: BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM” during
the 1st semester of academic year 2021-2022.

Thank you.

Truly yours,

Jonila Joys M. Cinco _______________________________

Principal Investigator/Proponent Co-Author/Proponent
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Recommending Approval: Noted and Approved:

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Department Head/ Dean/Principal Research Director/Dean
(Signature over printed name)

Attachment: 1 copy of the manuscript and photocopy of enrollment receipts (for student researchers)

6
 RESEARCH FORM 6: APPLICATION FOR FINAL PRESENTATION

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/ 2nd year Date Submitted: December 5, 2021

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR.

Laguna College of Business and Arts

Dear Dean Perez:

I am respectfully applying for FINAL Presentation of my Research Project entitled, “THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE
COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL: BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM” during
the 2nd semester of academic year 2021-2022.

Thank you.

Truly yours,

Jonila Joys M. Cinco _______________________________

Principal Investigator/Proponent Co-Author/Proponent
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Recommending Approval: Noted and Approved:

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Department Head/ Dean/Principal Research Director/ Dean
(Signature over printed name)

Attachment: 1 copy of the manuscript and photocopy of enrollment receipts (for student researchers)

7
 RESEARCH FORM 7: ASSIGNMENT AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS
FOR PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
TO : SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD__________________________________________________________________
FROM : DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM

PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys A. Modina________________________________________________________

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as CHAIRMAN OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS for Jonila Joys A. Modina.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the research proponent for the
improvement of the study and to lead the panel towards a meaningful research experience. For your
guidance, kindly refer to the prescribed evaluation rubric for research. The tentative date of the
PROPOSAL Presentation is on June 19, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

_____________________________________________

8
 RESEARCH FORM 8: ASSIGNMENT AS MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS
FOR PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
TO : ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd_______________________________________________________________
FROM : DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM
PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys A. Modina________________________________________________________

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS for Jonila Joys A. Modina.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the research proponent for the
improvement of the study. For your guidance, kindly refer to the prescribed evaluation rubric for
research. The tentative date of the PROPOSAL Presentation is June 19, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

__________________________________________

9
 RESEARCH FORM 8b: ASSIGNMENT AS MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS
FOR PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
TO : DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA______________________________________________________________
FROM : THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM

PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys A. Modina________________________________________________________

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS for Jonila Joys A. Modina.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the research proponent for the
improvement of the study. For your guidance, kindly refer to the prescribed evaluation rubric for
research. The tentative date of the PROPOSAL Presentation is June 19, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

___________________________________________

10
 RESEARCH FORM 9: ASSIGNMENT AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS
FOR FINAL PRESENTATION
TO : SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD__________________________________________________________________
FROM : DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM
PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as CHAIRMAN OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS for Jonila Joys M. Cinco.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the research proponent for the
improvement of the study and to lead the panel towards a meaningful research experience. For your
guidance, kindly refer to the prescribed evaluation rubric for research. The tentative date of the FINAL
Presentation is on December 1, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

__________________________________________

11
 RESEARCH FORM 10: ASSIGNMENT AS MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS
FOR FINAL PRESENTATION
TO : ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd_______________________________________________________________
FROM DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR_____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM

PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS for Jonila Joys M. Cinco.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the research proponent for the
improvement of the study. For your guidance, kindly refer to the prescribed evaluation rubric for
research. The tentative date of the FINAL Presentation is on December 1, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

________________________________________

12
 RESEARCH FORM 10b: ASSIGNMENT AS MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS
FOR FINAL PRESENTATION
TO : DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA______________________________________________________________
FROM : THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM
PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________
Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF EVALUATORS for Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to guide the research proponent for the
improvement of the study. For your guidance, kindly refer to the prescribed evaluation rubric for
research. The tentative date of the FINAL Presentation is on December 1, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

_________________________________________

13
 RESEARCH FORM 11: CHAIRMAN’S SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_______________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________

Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________

Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: June 19, 2021

RESEARCH SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COMPONENTS
Title None

CHAPTER 1: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction None

Theoretical/Conceptual Use other Theory

Framework

Research Paradigm Make it simple

Statement of the None

Problem/Central
Question

Hypotheses (if any)

Scope and Delimitations None

Significance of the Study None

Definition of Terms None

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF
RELATED LITERATURE
Thematic Organization None

Synthesis Too Long

14
 CHAPTER 3:
METHODOLOGY
Research Design None

Research Locale None

Population and Sampling Use Purposeful Sampling

Respondents/Participants None
of the Study

Instrument Organize the questions properly

Validation of Instrument None

Data Gathering None

Procedure

Treatment of Use other Model of TQD like: Smith, Georgie and Colazzi
Quantitative Data
and/or Qualitative Data

References None

Attestation:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Chairman of the Panel Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

15
 RESEARCH FORM 12: PANEL MEMBER’S SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________

Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________

Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: June 19, 2021
RESEARCH SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
COMPONENTS
Title None

CHAPTER 1: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction Use Transitional words
Too long

Theoretical/Conceptual Use other Theory

Framework

Research Paradigm None

Statement of the None

Problem/Central and
Corollary Questions

Hypotheses (if any)

Scope and Delimitations None

Significance of the Study None

Definition of Terms None

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Thematic Organization None

Synthesis Too long

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
Research Design None

Research Locale None

16
 Population and Sampling Use Purposeful sampling

Respondents/Participants None
of the Study

Instrument Revise Questions and organize it properly

Validation of Instrument None

Data Gathering None

Procedure

Treatment of Use other Model for TQD

Quantitative Data
and/or Qualitative Data

References None

Attestation:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Chairman of the Panel Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

17
 RESEARCH FORM 13: RESEARCH DIRECTOR’S SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________

Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________

Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: June 19, 2021

RESEARCH SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COMPONENTS
Title None

CHAPTER 1: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction No 1st Person
Hide Chapter Page

Theoretical/Conceptual None
Framework

Research Paradigm Correction of IPA procedure

Statement of the None

Problem/Central and
Corollary Questions

Hypotheses (if any)

Scope and Delimitations None

Significance of the Study No TO in Significance of the Study

Definition of Terms Complete the sentence

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Thematic Organization Use transitional Words
Add articles and studies on Philippine Settings

Synthesis Shorten the ideas of articles with the same concepts

Too Long

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
Research Design None

18
 Population and Sampling Use Purposeful Sampling

Research Locale None

Respondents/Participants Change “Co-researcher” to “Participants”

of the Study Follow table format

Instrument Revision of questions

Correcting Grammar and punctuation

Validation of Instrument None

Data Gathering None

Procedure

Treatment of Change it to paragraph format

Quantitative Data
and/or Qualitative Data

References None

Attestation:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Chairman of the Panel Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/SGS Dean

19
 RESEARCH FORM 14: CHAIRMAN’S SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR FINAL PAPER
Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________
Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021
RESEARCH COMPONENTS
SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER 4: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
 Make it more interesting, change the terms, not common but interesting
 Change themes and make it more interesting
 Tell the story
 Use theory to interpret
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
 Elaborate the essence of the lived experience of the Guidance Counselor in the New Normal
 Make the recommendation more realistic

ABSTRACT
None

REFERENCES, APPENDICES, ETC.

None

Attestation:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Chairman of the Panel Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

20
 RESEARCH FORM 15: PANEL MEMBER’S SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR FINAL PAPER
Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________
Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021
RESEARCH COMPONENTS
SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER 4: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
 Avoid lengthy words in the tables; use catchy/clear emerging themes
 Review the content of each themes
 Change the figure of Emerging Themes and make it clear
 The proposed program should address the findings
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
 Shorten the paragraph
 Recommendations- focus on guidance program
ABSTRACT
None

REFERENCES, APPENDICES, ETC.

None

Attestation:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Chairman of the Panel Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

21
 RESEARCH FORM 16: RESEARCH DIRECTOR’S SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR FINAL PAPER

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021
RESEARCH COMPONENTS
SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER 4: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
 Change Emerging Themes and Subordinate Themes
 Add more interpretation
 Discuss Participant’s Reaction
 Correction of grammar
 Change figure of Emerging Themes
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
 Correction of grammar
 Change some of recommendations
ABSTRACT
Too long, It should be 250 words only

REFERENCES, APPENDICES, ETC.

Add Content Validity Index on Appendices

Attestation:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Chairman of the Panel Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

22
 RESEARCH FORM 17: APPOINTMENT OF STATISTICIAN/QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYST

TO : Rose Ann B. Baldo, LPT, MAEd______________________________________________________________

FROM DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR_____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM

PROPONENT/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as STATISTICIAN/QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYST for Jonila Joys M. Cinco.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to perform accurate and reliable
statistical/qualitative data treatment and analysis. Before the final paper presentation, you are
required to submit to the Research Office a certification of quantitative/qualitative treatment. The
tentative date of the FINAL Presentation is December 1, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/SGS Dean

CONFORME:

_______________________________________

23
 RESEARCH FORM 18: APPOINTMENT OF CONTENT/GRAMMAR EDITOR

TO : GIRLIE S. SONORON, LPT, MAEd

FROM : DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM

RESEARCHER/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as CONTENT/GRAMMAR EDITOR for Jonila Joys M. Cinco.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to edit the SOFT COPY of the revised
manuscript (with evaluators’ recommendations incorporated by the researcher/s). Before hard
bounding, you are required to submit a Certificate of Grammar Editing. The tentative deadline for
hardbound manuscript submission is on July 18, 2022.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

____________________________________

24
 RESEARCH FORM 19: APPOINTMENT OF FORMAT EDITOR

TO : GIRLIE S. SONORON, LPT, MAEd

FROM : DEAN/THE RESEARCH DIRECTOR____________________________________________________________
TITLE : THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL:
BASIS FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM

RESEARCHER/S : Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Date Submitted :

You are hereby appointed as FORMAT EDITOR for Jonila Joys M. Cinco.

Should you agree with this appointment, you are requested to edit the SOFT COPY of the revised
manuscript based on the PRESCRIBED FORMAT. The tentative deadline for hardbound manuscript
submission is on July 18, 2021.

Thank you.

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

CONFORME:

________________________________________

25
 RESEARCH FORM 20: EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH PROJECT PROPOSAL
(PRESENTATION & MANUSCRIPT)
Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________
Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021
COMPONENTS UNACCEPTABLE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT SATISFACTORY VERY SATISFACTORY EXCELLENT Mean
Score
75-76 77-82 83-88 89-94 95-100
Introduction Failed to convey Vaguely conveyed Project moderately Conveyed project Clearly conveyed
project in context of project in context of conveyed in context within context of project within context
literature. No literature. Weak of literature. literature. of literature. Strong
rationale. Purpose rationale. Purpose was Moderately clear Moderately-strong rationale. Purpose
was unfocused and poorly focused and rationale. Purpose was rationale. Purpose was clear and
unclear not sufficiently clear somewhat focused was clear and focused. Problem
and clear focused. Problem was discussed
was discussed properly and zeroing
properly. in on the urgency of
the problem.
Review of Failed to review Inadequate review of Comprehensive Review of the Comprehensive
Related literature relevant to literature relevant to review of literature literature is fairly well review of literature
Literature the study. No the study. Poor relevant to the study. organized, relevant to the study.
synthesis, research, organized. Weak Moderately well acknowledging the Well organized, with
critique or rationale. rationale for choice of organized. Some relatedness of the nuance critique
Lacks description of theoretical mention of the research and regarding the
research samples, perspectives/empirical relatedness of scholarship. The relatedness of the
methodologies, & studies. Insufficient scholarship. rationale for research and
findings description of Moderately clear including / excluding scholarship reviewed.
research samples, rationale for choice of various theoretical Includes specific
methodologies, & theoretical perspectives / criteria for inclusion /
findings. perspectives/empirical empirical studies is exclusion of various
studies. Somewhat apparent. Includes theoretical
focused description of description of perspectives /
research samples, research samples empirical studies.
methodologies, & and methodologies Clearly describes
findings. research samples,
methodologies &
findings.
Methods/ Little or no Inadequate Moderate or excessive Most detail Appropriate detail of
Approach description of (if description of (if description of (if included/slightly (if applicable):
applicable): subjects, applicable): subjects, applicable): subjects, excessive detail in subjects,
design/approach, design/approach, design/approach, description of (if design/approach,
methods/procedures, methods/procedures, methods/procedures, applicable): subjects, methods/procedures,
and statistical and statistical and statistical design/approach, and statistical
analyses. analyses. analyses. methods/procedures, analyses.
and statistical
analyses.
OVERALL MEAN SCORE

COMMENTS:

PANEL OF EVALUATORS:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA
Panel Chair Panel Member 1 Panel Member 2

Noted by:

SHELLA R. GARCIA, LPT, RGC

Research Adviser

26
 RESEARCH FORM 21: EVALUATION RUBRIC FOR FINAL PRESENTATION & MANUSCRIPT

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021
COMPONENTS UNACCEPTABLE MAJOR SATISFACTORY VERY EXCELLENT Mean
IMPROVEMENT SATISFACTORY Score
75-76 77-82 83-88 89-94 95-100
Introduction Failed to convey Vaguely conveyed Project Conveyed Clearly conveyed
project in context project in context moderately project within project within
of literature. No of literature. Weak conveyed in context of context of
rationale. Purpose rationale. Purpose context of literature. literature. Strong
was unfocused was poorly literature. Moderately- rationale. Purpose
and unclear focused and not Moderately clear strong rationale. was clear and
sufficiently clear rationale. Purpose Purpose was focused.
was somewhat clear and
focused and focused.
clear
Review of Failed to review Inadequate review Comprehensive Review of the Comprehensive
Related literature relevant of literature review of literature is fairly review of
Literature to the study. No relevant to the literature relevant well organized, literature relevant
research critique study. Poorly to the study. acknowledging to the study. Well
or rationale. organized. Weak Moderately the relatedness of organized, with
Lacks description rationale for organized. Some the research and nuance critique
of research choice of mention of the scholarship. The regarding the
samples, theoretical relatedness of rationale for relatedness of the
methodologies, & perspectives/empi scholarship. including / research and
findings rical studies. Moderately clear excluding various scholarship
Insufficient rationale for theoretical reviewed.
description of choice of perspectives / Includes specific
research samples, theoretical empirical studies criteria for
methodologies, & perspectives/em is apparent. inclusion /
findings. pirical studies. Includes exclusion of
Somewhat description of various
focused research samples theoretical
description of and perspectives /
research samples, methodologies empirical studies.
methodologies, & Clearly describes
findings. research samples,
methodologies &
findings.
Methods/ Little or no Inadequate Moderate or Most detail Appropriate
Approach description of (if description of (if excessive included/slightly detail of (if
applicable): applicable): description of (if excessive detail in applicable):
subjects, subjects, applicable): description of (if subjects,
design/approach design/approach, subjects, applicable): design/approach
, methods/procedur design/approach subjects, ,
methods/proced es, and statistical , design/approach methods/proced
ures, and analyses. methods/proced , ures, and
statistical ures, and methods/proced statistical
analyses. statistical ures, and analyses.
analyses. statistical
analyses.
Results / Absence of Few pertinent Some pertinent Most pertinent All pertinent
Outcomes pertinent results. results. results not results reported results reported
Table/figures are Tables/figures are reported; results and in fairly clear and in clear and
absent or inappropriate or presented in and concise concise manner.
inappropriate, incomplete, poorly clear and manner. Table/figures are
not labeled, and labeled, and concise manner. Tables/figures labeled
no legend. inadequate Table/figures labeled appropriately
legend generally labeled appropriately and included
appropriately and included legend.
and included legend.
legend.
Discussion Little or no Major topics or Discussion is to Discussion Brief and concise
/Summary discussion of concepts brief/excessive, sufficient and few discussion of
needs to be more
/Conclusions project findings / inaccurately errors, though not major
concise of major
outcomes. described. findings/outcomes.
particularly findings/outcome
Displayed poor Considerable Several engaging, or . Was superior,
grasp of relevant, discussion inaccuracies and thought- accurate,
understanding. missing. omissions. provoking. engaging, and
Conclusion/summ Conclusions/summ Conclusions/summa Greater thought-
ary not supported ary not entirely ry generally based foundation provoking.
by supported by on needed from Conclusions/sum
findings/outcomes
findings/outcome findings/outcomes past work in area. maries and
Conclusions/sum recommendation
mary based on s appropriate and
outcomes and clearly based on
appropriate, but outcomes.
included no
recommendation
.
Writing Quality Research lacks Research is Research is Research is Research is
clarity and unclear moderately clear. written with clarity written with great

27
 precision. throughout. Several errors in and precision. clarity and
Sentences are Frequent errors in word choice, Writing is precision. Each
poorly word choice, grammar, understandable. sentence is
constructed and grammar, punctuation, and Word choice, understandable.
confusing. Word punctuation, and spelling. The grammar, Word choice,
choice, grammar, spelling. The narrative lacks punctuation and grammar,
punctuation, and narrative focus. Uneven spelling are punctuation and
spelling, reflects discussion lacks application of 6th adequate. The spelling are
poor grasp of focus and edition APA narrative is logical excellent. The
basic writing coherence. conventions. and coherent. narrative is logical
conventions. Frequent errors in Mostly correct and coherent.
Narrative absent. use of 6th edition use of 6th edition Correct use of 6th
Incorrect use of APA conventions APA. edition APA.
6th edition APA
OVERALL MEAN SCORE

Comments:

PANEL OF EVALUATORS:

SHIELILO R. AMIHAN, PhD ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR. MAEd DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA
Panel Chair Panel Member 1 Panel Member 2

Noted by:

SHELLA R. GARCIA, LPT, RGC

Research Adviser

28
 RESEARCH FORM 22: RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY BOARD APPROVAL

Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________

Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021

The LCBA Research Ethics and Integrity Board (LCBA-REIB) has recently reviewed your
responses to the condition placed upon the ethical approval for the project outlined below.
Your Research Project is now deemed to meet the requirements stipulated in the LCBA
Research Manual and full ethical approval has been granted.

Project Title THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING

MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL: BASIS FOR
GUIDANCE PROGRAM

Approval Date June 15, 2022

Turnitin Similarity 19%
LCBA- REIB Decision CLEARED AND APPROVED

The standard conditions of this approval are:

(a) The research project has been strictly conducted in accordance with the proposal
submitted.
(b) The research project has been subjected to anti-plagiarism checker and has complied
with the required 20% similarity index.
(c) The research project has strictly observed ethical considerations stipulated in the
paper.

Please note that failure to comply with the conditions of approval may result in withdrawal of
approval for the research project.

GIRLIE S. SONORON, LPT, MAEd

Chair, LCBA Research Ethics and Integrity Board

DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA

Research Director/Dean

29
 RESEARCH FORM 23: SUMMARY OF SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FROM CHIEF STATISTICIAN/QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYST
Principal Investigator: Jonila Joys M. Cinco_________________________________________________________
Co-Authors (if any) : _____________________________________________________________________________
Department/Unit : School of Graduate Studies___________________________________________________
Course/Year (for students): MAEd- Guidance and Counseling/2nd Year Date Presented: December 7, 2021
ON ITEMS ON THE STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM/QUESTIONS THAT REQUIRE TREATMENT

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE TOOLS/TREATMENT USED

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ON THE VALIDITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF THE DATA-GATHERING INSTRUMENT/S

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ON THE NECESSITY AND/OR APPROPRIATENESS OF SAMPLING TECHNIQUE/S

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

30
 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Prepared by: Attestation:

ROSE ANN B. BALDO, LPT, MAEd DR. MA. LORENA M. TAGALA JONILA JOYS M. CINCO
Chief Statistician/
Qualitative Data Analyst Research Director Principal Investigator
(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Noted by:

ALFREDO G. PEREZ JR., MAEd

Academe Director

31
 RESEARCH FORM 24:

CERTIFICATE OF DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION

(Attach file and documentation)

32
 On July 28, 2022, the Guidance Counselor of Calamba Bayside Integrated School, Mrs.

Pacita C. Manalo, received a copy of the manuscript entitled “THE ROLE OF GUIDANCE

COUNSELORS IN PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEW NORMAL: BASIS FOR GUIDANCE

PROGRAM.” Before signing the certificate, she asked about the content of the study and what

the result of the study was; the researcher discussed the findings and stressed the output that

may be useful to their school district.

33
 RESEARCH FORM 25:

CERTICATE OF PUBLICATION
(Attach certificate photograph here)

34
35