You are on page 1of 20

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Vol. 22, No. 3, Sept.

1982
Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering

CORROSION OF STEEL PILES DRIVEN IN SOIL DEPOSITS

Y ORIHIKO 0HSAKI*

ABSTRACT
About 130 steel piles of 15m length with L-shaped cross-section were driven into natural
soil deposits at 10 stations for corrosion tests under a wide variety of soil conditions. Prior
to driving, thicknesses of the test piles were measured and physical, chemical and electro-
chemical characteristics of the soil deposits were investigated. The piles were withdrawn
approximately 2, 5, and 10 years after driving and the corrosion rates were evaluated.
The test results obtained in this 10 years research indicate that
( 1) the withdrawn piles were generally in excellent condition, corrosion effects were
minimal and independent of soil condition,
( 2) the average corrosion rate was approximately 0. 01 mmfyear per both faces of a pile
over the period of 10 years,
( 3) the corrosion of the inner face of a pipe pile seems to be the same as the outer face,
( 4) it is difficult to find any particular soil parameter which influenced the corrosion rate
most decisively, and
( 5) any effect on corrosion of steel composition (mild steel, copper-bearing steel or
weathering steel), cathodic protection or protection by painting was not evident. Influences
of welding, cold-working, and underground electric leakage current were insignificant.

Key words : ~orrosjQ!!_, design, :field test, natural ground, pile, statistical analysis, steel
(IGC : D 2/C 8/H 1)

lich, 1950; Kinson and Eadie, 1980; Roma-


INTRODUCTION noff, 1962; Wilson et al., 1973) on the corro-
Corrosion of steel piles is one of the most sion of steel piles driven in natural, undis-
important and unsolved problems in the turbed soils is inadequate. Information,
:field of foundation engineering; the possi- however, has been obtained from observa-
bility and extent of corrosion have always tions and measurements on extracted or
aroused questions and anxieties whenever the excavated steel piles which had been in
use of a load-bearing steel pile foundation actual service for a known period but, to
is considered for a structure. While abundant the knowledge of the author, controlled
data on the corrosion of steel and other tests with pre-measured test piles are still
metallic materials are available from labora- very few.
tory tests on disturbed soil samples, infor- Under these circumstances, it was the
mation (Bjerrum, 1957; Eadie, 1977; Greu- intention of this research project to make

* Professor, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo.


Manuscript was received for review on December 1, 1981.
Written discussions on this paper should be submitted before July 1, 1983.

This is an Open Access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.


NII-Electronic Library Service
58 OHSAKI

{a) TEST PILE


L lOOxlOO TEST PILES
As the standard test specimen in this
research, a steel pile of 15m length with
L-shaped cross-section of 100 x 100 mm, as
shown in Fig. 1(a), was used. The nominal
thickness was 9 or 10 mm, and the material
was primarily SS 41, Japanese Industrial
Standard (P<O. 05%, S<O. 05%, yield point
>25 kgfmm 2, tensile strength=41,.....__52 kg/
E
0
1,()
mm 2). Millscale was present on the surface.
While pipe piles and H-piles are used
almost exclusively for actual steel pile
foundations, an L-shaped cross-section was
chosen for research purposes since thickness
measurements with a micrometer are easy
and most accurate in this case. A smaller
size than actual piles was adopted to avoid
difficulty in withdrawal after many years in
the soil. The pile was not rolled to L-
Fig.l. Test pile shape, but was formed by bending a steel
plate in order to detect any effect of cold-
working upon corrosion. This method of
construction avoids the non-uniform sections
. of conventional L-shapes. Additionally the
test piles of 15m length were fabricated
from five pieces of 3m length by arc weld-
ing to investigate corrosion behavior at and
around the welded joints. Photo. 1 shows a
general view of a test pile before welding.
Fifteen measurement zones of 100 mm
width were assigned to the surface of the
test piles at an interval of 1m, and marked
by red paint, as shown in Fig. 1(b).
The total number of test piles used in this
research was 126, and the total length
amounted to 1. 93 km.

DRIVING OF TEST PILES


Photo.l. General view of test pile
Prior to driving the test piles, the thick-
visual examinations and thickness measure- nesses were carefully measured with a
ments of corrosion losses of actual steel piles, micrometer at 20 or 40 points within each
driven in natural soil deposits at different measurement zone, and their mean value and
locations in a wide variety of soil conditions. standard deviation were calculated.
Based on the test results, it was desired to Ten sites were selected as shown in Fig. 2
evaluate corrosion rates and to identify any and in Table 1, widely spread over the whole
soil parameters which affect the extent of country and, in general, of soil conditions
corrosion. likely to be corrosive. A bore was drilled

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 59

Table 1. List of test stations


Station Location Soil Conditions Number of
No. Test Piles Test Items

1 Tokyo Alluvial clay 9 Corrosion of SS 41


Corrosion of SS 41
2 Okayama Coastal reclaimed soils 12 Corrosion of copper steel
Effect of cathodic protection
(impressed current system)

3 Hiroshima Two-layers of sand and silt 10 Corrosion of SS 41


4 Kanagawa Uniformly deposited loam 9 Corrosion of SS 41
Corrosion of SS 41
Corrosion of weathering steel
5 Hyogo Coastal reclaimed soils 15
Corrosion of welded joints
Influence of underground current
Corrosion of SS 41
6 Tokyo Gravel layer 9
Influence of ground-water flow
Corrosion of SS 41
7 Tokyo Alternation of sand and clay 12 Influence of leakage current from electric
layers railway
Effect of protection by painting

1l Akita Lake-side reclaimed soils 9 Corrosion of SS 41

Alternation of sand and silt Corrosion of SK 41


9 Saitama 11
layers Inside corrosion of pipe pile
Corrosion of SS 41
Influence of reinforcing bars in concrete
10 Okayama Coastal reclaimed soils 30 footing
Effect of cathodic protection
(sacrificial anodes system)

STATION N0.8 - - - - - . .
HACHIROGATA RECLAIMED
LAND
STATION N0.9 - - - - - - - . .
TAKESATO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION
STATION N0.7 - - - - - - - - - - .
TAKENOTSUKA HOUSING DEVELOP~1ENT
JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION
STATION N0.6 - - - - - . .
KAJIMA INSTITUTE OF
CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY

STATION N0.10 -------..


MIZUSHIMA IRON WORKS
KAWASAKI STEEL CORP.

STATION N0.3 - - - - - . . .
ENGINEERING CAMPUS
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY

STATION N0.1
UMAYABASHI SUBSTATION
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO.
STATION N0.4
SAGAMIHARA RESEARCH INST.
NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
STATION N0.5
AMAGASAKI STEAM-POWER PLANT
KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER CO.

Fig. 2. Test stations

NII-Electronic Library Service


60 ORSAKI

fully examined and photographed.


In general, piles were in excellent condi-
tion and, except a portion in the aerated
topsoil, millscale was still present almost
over the whole length of the test pile.
Photo. 2 is an example showing the surface
of a test pile withdrawn after ten years
exposure to a soil deposit.

EVALUATION OF CORROSION RATE


Piles were transported to the laboratory,
and each measurement zone cleaned for
three minutes with a powered, rotating wire
brush. This had previously been shown to be
Photo. 2. Surface of test pile at 10 adequate to remove all corrosion products
years after driving from the surface of a steel pile without
abrading the intact material.
at each site, the formation of soil deposit Thicknesses at every measurement zone
was investigated in detail and properties of were measured with a micrometer. Measure-
the soils (penetration test, electric resis- ments prior to driving and after withdrawal
tivity, depolarization, hydrogen-ion concentra- were all performed with the same micrometer
tion) were measured at different depths in and by the same person to avoid both
the bore hole. instrumental and personal errors. The repeat-
The test piles were driven in the years ed measurement-tests established that satis-
1962 to 1966 with a drop hammer. The factory accuracy could be warranted to two
number of test piles at each site, general places of decimals in millimeters. Thicknesses
soil conditions, and primary test items are were measured at 20 or 40 points in each
tabulated in Table 1. measurement zone, and their mean value and
standard deviation were calculated. Let
x 0 : mean value of thicknesses in a meas-
WITHDRAWAL OF TEST PILES urement zone prior to driving in mil-
One-third of the test piles at each station limeters
were withdrawn and measured approximately x : mean value of thicknesses in the same
two years after driving, as previously re- zone after withdrawal in millimeters
ported (Ohsaki, 1969). A further one-third T : time from driving to withdrawal in
were withdrawn approximately five years years
from the time of driving and results of then, the difference of averaged thicknesses
observations and measurements were pub- at driving and withdrawal 1s
lished in an interim report (Ohsaki, 1972). AX=X0 -x ( 1)
The remaining one-third of the test piles
and the corrosion rate is represented by
were withdrawn during 197 4 to 1975 approxi-
mately ten years after driving. The present v=Ax/T (2)
paper primarily concerns the results of in millimeters/year per both faces.
examination and measurements of corrosion However, there is an inevitable scatter of
rates with respect to these test piles. individual values of measured thickness and
The test piles were withdrawn by means it is necessary to test whether the difference
of oil-jacks or a crane. Immediately after between two mean values is statistically
withdrawal, they were water-washed, care- significant or has merely resulted from the

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 61

Table 2. Percentages of significance also represented in the same diagram using


level (%) a symbol WT.
Withdrawal *** I ** Total
1st 51 32 17 100 Station No.1 : Umayabashi Substation, Tokyo
2nd 80 13 7 100 Electric Power Co., Tokyo
3rd 77 15 8 100
~~------·--
Corrosion patterns were examined in
extremely soft, silty soils, a typical forma-
scatter of measured values. In the latter
tion encountered in the alluvial plain
case no conclusions can be drawn concerning
in downtown Tokyo. Visual examination
the effect of corrosion. The Student t-test
showed almost no change in appearance on
(Walpole and Myers, 1978) was used to
the surfaces of withdrawn piles from that
assess the significance of the data. The
before driving, except that the portion
probability P that the differences in the
within approximately 2m of the ground
means could have arisen from random varia-
surface was covered with a reddish rust,
tions in the data was obtained in the usual
millscale fell off and the steel surface was
way.
rather rounded at the corner and edges of
As the level of significance, the following
the L-shaped cross-section (Photo. 2). Such
values and symbols are used in this paper:
an appearance was observed not only at this
0. 001>P significant station but was common to almost all with-
0. 1 > P>O. 001 significance
questionable
***} drawn test piles at all stations. No partic-
ular behavior was observed at the welded
P>0.1 insignificant *** joints.
(3) The corrosion rates were minimal at the
The percentages of significant levels in all top and extremely small over the rest of
measurement zones were as tabulated in the piles as seen in Fig. 3. No increase of
Table 2 for each withdrawal time. Only corrosivity can be seen near the boundary
the three-starred, significant corrosion rates between the silt and sand layers.
were adopted to base analyses and discussions
upon as reliable data as possible. Station No.2: Mizushima Iron Works,
As a consequence many small values of Kawasaki Steel Corporation, Okayama
corrosion rate were discarded in the analyses, The site has recently been reclaimed from
resulting in conservative conclusions regard- the sea and the soil profile indicates a com-
ing the corrosion rates. plicated formation of sea-bottom materials.
The t-distribution test was also utilized Because of the short time after reclama-
for comparison of different pile materials, tion, ground subsidence took place over the
for assessment of the effects of cathodic entire site and, as a consequence, the test
protection and other factors. piles projected above the ground surface by
approximately 1. 5 m at the time of the
final withdrawal. The projecting part was
TEST STATIONS AND TEST RESULTS severely corroded and, after the wire-brush
Soil conditions, specific test items, results cleaning of corrosion products, the corrosion
of visual examination of pile surfaces at the rates were found to be approximately equal
third withdrawal, and measured values of to 0. 03 mm/year; however, the remainder of
the corrosion rate during the exposure period the piles were in excellent condition, as
at each test station are briefly described in shown in Fig. 4. The average corrosion rate
this chapter. The corrosion rates are ex- was 0. 0114 mmfyear, which was far less than
pressed in millimeters/year/both-faces and are anticipated for the saline environment at
illustrated in a diagram showing their varia- the station. No definite correlation exists
tion with depth. The ground water table is between the soil material and the corrosion

NII-Electronic Library Service


62 OHSAKI

STATION N0.1 UMAVABASHI SUBSTATION


STATION N0.2 MIZUSHIMA IRON WORKS
TOK\'0 ELECTRIC POWER CO.
KAWASAKI STEEL CORPORATION
DEPTH
(M)
SOIL I
0
CORROSION RATE (MM/YR)
.01 .02
] DEPTH
(M)
CORROSION RATE (MM/YR)
.01
WTI

z-
-

-
w SANDY
SILT 't> ...3..-

~<: SILT\'
4
4 -
,5~ SAND

!--
-_:--_
( 6

6 8
r=--=--
r-:::::::-
f---
8 - !-::::
_-_;:
l 10

-1-_-...:: 12
1--
10- ,_:-...:- SILT
~----=-
~---=-
14
r--...:::.
r---=-
12 - -:.._-_ 16
- r---=---
!--:.:-

14
~---=--
~-:::
-;:-~-
.i I
18

20
SAND
GRAVEL
~-~ i
Fig. 3. Corrosion rates at Station - SS41 -COPPER STEEL === CATHOD. PROTECT.
No.1
Fig. 4. Corrosion rates at Station
rate, and the latter was not unduly high No.2
even at the boundary between clayey soil and
Table 3. Effects of cathodic protection
sandy gravel around a depth of 17. 5 m,
(Impressed current system)
which had been anticipated to be the worst
condition. This was supported also by visual Material
Mean Corrosion Rate (mm/yr) ISignifi·
examination of the withdrawn piles. IUnprotected I Protected Difference
f cance

The test piles in this station were divided ss 41 I o. 0105 I o. 0084 I o. 0021 I **
into two groups; one group was unpro- Copper Steel 0. 0108 ~ 0. 0103-----~~~005 *
tected and the other had been under con-
Table 4. Effects of copper steel
trolled cathodic protection from an impressed
current system since the time of driving. The
Proteotion I
Mean Corrosion Rate (mmi;r) Signifi- I
two groups had been driven about 60 m SS 41 I Copper Steel IDifference cance

apart from each other; this distance was I -0.0003 I *


1

Unprotected I 0. 0105 0. 0108 1 .

found sufficient for the unprotected group Protected o. oo84 o. o103 1 - o. oo19 **
not to be influenced by the impressed current
on the protected group. The pile-to-soil Furthermore, the test piles were grouped
potential was maintained within the range in accordance with their material, i.e., car-
of -820 to -940 m V, exceeding the protec- bon steel (SS 41) or steel containing 0. 26%
tive potential of -770mV. On the other Cu. From Fig. 4 or Table 4, however, the
hand, measurement at the time of the copper constituent can be seen to have no
first withdrawal indicated that the poten- effect on the reduction of underground cor-
tials of unprotected piles were -660 to -670 rosion, or the effect is possibly adverse when
mV. cathodic protection is applied.
From a comparison of two groups in Fig. The oxidation-reduction (Redox) potentials
4 or in Table 3, it seems that a slight in the soil deposit were in the range of
effect only due to the cathodic protection +346 to +528 m V and corrosion by anaerobic
may be observed. bacteria was not anticipated.

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 63

Station No.3 : Engineering Campus, Hiro- Table 5 Effect of weathering steel


shima University, Hiroshima Mean Corrosion Rate (mm/yr)
Significance
The soil deposit is of a distinct, two-
layered formation, i.e., the upper sand layer
SS 41
----o.oo87- - - - o. 0064 r-- o.
(Weathering Steeli Difference
0-02-3--+------*- -
and the lower silt layer with the water
1

table near the ground surface as shown in STATION N0.3 ENGINEERING CAMPUS
Fig. 5. As also shown in Fig. 5, the corrosion HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY

rates were low over the entire length of the DEPTH CORROSION RATE (MM/YR)
(M) SOIL
piles, and no difference can be seen between 0 .01 .02 .03

the sandy and silty layers or at their bound-


ary.

Station No.4 : Sagamihara Research Insti-


tute, Nippon Steel Corporation, Kanagawa
The soil consists of a uniform layer of
Kanto-Loam, an aeolian deposit of volcanic
ash widely distributed in the area around
Tokyo. The ground water table was not
encountered within a depth of 15m.
As shown in Fig. 6, the corrosion rates
are, in general, small; however, in spite of
the complete uniformity of the soil deposit,
the corrosion rate vs. depth curves show
considerable variations.

Station No.5 : Amagasaki Steam-Power Fig. 5. Corrosion rates at Station


Plant, Kansai Electric Power Co., Hyogo No.3
The site has recently been reclaimed from
STATION N0.4 SAGAMIHARA RESEARCH 1NST.
the sea, and considerable underground elec- NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
tric current is present from the generating
facilities. .03
In spite of the unfavorable conditions,
the corrosion rates were quite low, as shown
in Fig. 7. In addition, the corrosion rates
were rather uniform vertically despite the
complicated soil formation.
One-third of the test piles were made of
weathering steel (C;£0. 20%, Mn;£1. 00%,
Si;£0. 35%, P;£0. 05%, S;£0. 04%, Cu;£0. 25
%), and the remainder were carbon steel
(SS 41). The difference of corrosion rates
between these two materials is shown in
Table 5, which indicates that any benefit
from weathering steel is doubtful for subsoil
corrosion.
In general, the test pile of 15m was made
up of five pieces of 3m length, as mentioned
previously. However, for the test piles at Fig. 6. Corrosion rates at Station
this station only, two sub-pieces of 1. 5m No.4

NII-Electronic Library Service


64 OHSAKI

STAT! ON NO.5 AMAGASAKI STEAM-POWER PLANT STATION N0.6 KAJIMA INSTITUTE OF CONSTRUCTION
KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER CO. TECHNOLOGY

DEPTH CORROSION RATE (MM/YR) DEPTH CORROSION RATE (MM/YR)


SOIL SOIL
(M) .01 .02 .03 (M) 0

8
RANGE OF GROUND
WATER LEVEL
10

14

---WEATHERING STEEL
Fig. 8. Corrosion rates at Station
Fig. 7. Corrosion rates at Station No.6
No.5
ference is insignificant because of the large
Table 6. Comparison of corrosion rates
scatter of thicknesses in the welded zones.
at welded and base portions

----:: : n c~~~I~ft~~n;,=r~;gn~.=:- Station No.6: Kajima Institute of Construc-


tion Technology, Tokyo
~-o_.o~j___o. oo!~_j __ o. 00_2!____ 1 The site is underlain by gravel and boulder
layers at 4 to 10m, where an abundant
length were connected by arc-welding to ground water flow is encountered. The test
make up each piece of 3 m length. It will be piles were thus exposed to a replenished
understood from Fig. 1(a) that the welded oxygen supply from the flowing ground
joint comes to a position of one of the water; however, as shown in Fig. 8, the
measurement zones. The weld metal was corrosion rates in the water-flowing layers
removed by grinding prior to driving until were smaller than those in the upper loam
the surface became flush with that of the layers, and were about the same as the
base. However, the grinder-finished surface rates in the lower silt layer, where the
was not sufficiently smooth for quantitative water was supposedly stagnant.
measurements as the standard deviation of The record of the underground hydrograph,
the measured thicknesses in all welded zones shown in Fig. 9, indicates that the level
was 0. 1187 mm, exceedingly large when of flowing water seasonally changes between
compared with 0. 0253 mm m the normal depths of approximately 7,....._,10 m. Thus, this
zones. part of the length of the piles was alter-
The result of statistical comparison of nately subjected to wetting and drying, but
the corrosion rates indicates, as shown in corrosion in the range was not serious.
Table 6, that the mean rate in the welded
zones is larger than in the normal zones by Station No.7 : T akenotsuka Housing Develop-
approximately 30%, but this apparent dif- ment, Japan Housing Corporation, Tokyo

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 65

1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 STATION N0.7 TAKENOTSUKA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION

HIGHEST LEVEL -6.8m DEPTH CORROSION RATE {MM/YR)


{M) SOIL
0 .01 .02 .03

1Z
1970 1971 197Z 1973 1974

6 .>{.
8

LOWEST LEVEL ·10.5 m 10


IZ

Fig. 9. Change of ground water level 12

The soil profile consists alternately of al-


14
luvial sand and clay layers. Twelve test
piles were driven in a line with a spacing
of 2m. ---PAINTED
There is a railway line for DC electric Fig.lO. Corrosion rates at
trains parallel to and approximately 30m Station No.7
from the alignment, and leakage current was
anticipated to be present. The potential of leakage current might be regarded as
gradients on the ground surface were insignificant if the distance from a railway
measured several times in two directions, is not less than approximately 30m.
i.e., along and perpendicular to the align- One-fourth of the test piles at this station
ment. The results indicated that the gradients were used to examine the effect of protection
were larger in the perpendicular direction, by painting, for which millscale was com-
and were largest in the evening when the pletely removed by grit-blasting and coal
traffic was busiest. In the evening, the mean tar-epoxy resin was applied prior to driving.
potential gradient was approximately 6 mV/ The paint was three-layered and its total
meter and the maximum value amounted to thickness was approximately 450 microns.
more than 20m Vfmeter. The underground As reported before (Ohsaki, 1969; Ohsaki,
potential gradients, which were measured 1972), no difference in corrosion rate was
by using the bore-holes, were in the range found between painted and unprotected piles
of one to several tenth of the values on the at the first withdrawal, and the painted pile
ground surface. showed rather larger corrosion at the second
These findings suggested that a considerable withdrawal.
amount of leakage current from the electric At the final withdrawal, the paint came
railway was actually· present in the soil, off partially and the remaining ·paint could
in which the test piles were driven. readily be removed by wire-brushing. The
However, as shown in Fig. 10, the cor- corrosion rates of the painted pile are as
rosion rate of only one test pile exceeded shown in Fig. 10, and seem to be smaller
0. 02 mmfyear at a shallow depth, but the than the rates of unprotected piles. How-
rates of the other parts of the same pile ever, the difference is statistiCally insignif-
and of the other two test piles were not icant and, in addition, the part of the
particularly large in comparison with the painted pile below a depth of 6 m failed to
rates at the other stations. Thus, the effect be withdrawn due to the break of a welded

NII-Electronic Library Service


66 OHSAKI

JOint. In view of these facts, it may be STATION N0.8 HACHIROGATA RECLAHlED


reasonable to conclude that painting, as used LAND
in this station, was not effective against
DEPTH CORROSION RATE ( Ml>'JYR)
SOIL
corrosion. (M) 0 .Gl . 02 .03

Station No.8: Hachirogata Reclaimed Land,


2
Akita
The site has been reclaimed from a lake
4
of brackish water. The measurement of
chloride ion content in the pore water at
the time of driving indicated that the salinity
was approximately one-tenth that of sea
8
water. The silty soil in the site was extreme-
ly soft, with an N-value in the standard
10
penetration test of zero down to a depth
of 16m.
12
The part of the test piles in the aerated
topsoil corroded noticeably; however, below 14
a depth of approximately 6 m, millscale was
still present and no sign of corrosion was
observed in spite of the saline underground Fig.ll. Corrosion rates at Station
environment. No.8
As shown in Fig. 11, the corrosion rates
are minimal and nearly uniform. L 100 X 100 X 9

Station No.9: Takesato Housing Develop- PIPE PILE


ment, Japan Housing Corporation, Saitama
The soil deposit consists of an upper layer
of dense sand and an underlying, extremely
soft, clayey-silt layer.
At this station, the inside corrosion of a pipe
pile was investigated by driving a standard
L-shaped test pile inside a pipe pile with
a diameter of 318 mm as shown in Fig. 12. Fig. 12. Test pile for examination
Then, both were connected by a steel wire, of inside corrosion
so that the inner pile simulated corrosion
behavior of the inside surface of a pipe abandoned at withdrawal. Hence, the data
pile. It has hitherto been assumed that the at the final withdrawal are not sufficient
corrosion of the inside surface would be for quantitative comment and, therefore,
negligible as it is shielded from access of the corrosion rates at the times of first and
oxygen and electrical influences from sur- second withdrawals are added to Fig. 13.
rounding soils. Fig. 13 and a statistical comparison in
Nevertheless, no difference m appearance Table 7 lead to a conclusion that there is no
could be distiguished between the inner pile significant difference in corrosiveness between
and the other piles which were directly the outer and inner surfaces of a pipe pile.
exposed to the natural soil deposit.
The corrosion rates are as shown in Fig. 13. Station No. 10: Mizushima Iron Works,
Unfortunately, the part of the inner pile Kawasaki Steel Corporation, Okayama
below a depth of 3. 8 m was torn off and The site is located several hundred meters

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 67

STATION NO.9 TEKESATO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION

CORROSION RATE (MM/YR)


DEPTH
(H) SOIL FIRST WITHDRAWAL SECOND WITHDRAWAL THIRD WITHDRAWAL
.02 .02 .03

.8

10

12

14

- - - - INSIDE
Fig.l3. Corrosion rates at Station No.9
Table 7. Comparison of corrosion rates at inner and outer
surfaces of pipe pile
Years after
Driving
I Mean Corro•ion Rate (mm/yr)
Significance
Outer Surface I Inner Surface I Difference
2.30 years 0. 0281 0. 0341 -0.0060 *
4.50years 0. 0276 0. 0312 -0.0036 *
9.36years 0.0062 0.0057 0. 0005 *

POTENTIOMF:TER

-----,I -------,I
I I
--------,
I
I
I I I
I I I

Fig. 15. Measurement of pile-to-soil


potential
from the site for Station No.2 towards a
hill-side and the top layer 1s filled with
Fig.l4. soils from a nearby mountain.
Test piles Some groups of four test piles were capped
with footing with reinforced concrete footings as shown
in Fig. 14, and the others were left bare
to investigate whether the reinforcing bars

NII-Electronic Library Service


68 OHSAKI

Table 8. Effects of reinforced concrete Table 9. Effects of cathodic protection


footing (Sacrificial anodes system)
- - ~ Meall. Corrosi~n Rate (mm/yr) I Years after! Mean Corrosion Rate (mm/yr) I Signifi-
Significance
With Footing I Without Footing Difference J ~~~~_:~-- ?np~otect~~- Protecte~J mr:_erenc:_l_ can:_
o. 0135 1 o. 0159 1 -o. oo24 1 ** 2. 02 years 0. 0252 0. 0266 -0.0014
5. 07 years 0. 0347 0. 0302 0. 0045 **
9. 29 years 0. 0135 0. 0106 0. 0029 ***
WITH ·FOOTING
1000 WITH ANODES
/ /~ v ~
~ STATION NO.lO MIZUSHIMA IRON WORKS
KA\~ASAKI STEEL CORPORATION

l! v/ CORROSION RATE (1-!JVYR)


800
/.~~~ v DEPTH
(M)
SOIL
0 .03
!_, /
v I.Vv
v
/
·· ..

- v b,.
...: 600
;:: ~ SAND
ffi 2 FILL
t-
_V
.•

....
C>

400
4

WITH FOOTING 6
800 WITHOUT ANODE
~
._

600
& r--.. ..._ - 1-" t-~ll
~
8

v~~
1/ 10
-t;; /~l/
400
/
~ l-- 12

14
WITHOUT FOOTING
WITHOUT ANODE
,~1-+-

--
_ _ WITHOUT WITH lo.'ITH FOOTING
800 FOOTING FOOTING CATHOD. PROTECT.
Fig.17. Corrosion rates at Station
t- vv
I'=" f'
!/ t-..... No.lO
600 ........

sulphate electrode was placed on the ground


400
surface at various distances from the test
0.1 0.2 0.5 2 5 10
- - DISTANCE (M}
pile.
The results of measurement are as shown
Fig. 16. Pile-to-soil potentials
in Fig. 16, suggesting that considerable
in the footing might cause excessive cor- current is flowing from both the aluminum
rosion by forming an electric macro~cell with anode and the macro-cell.
the steel piles. Re-measuremen t of pile-to-soil potentials
In addition, aluminum anodes of approxi- performed immediately before the final with-
mately 1. 0 m length were attached to some drawal of test piles showed that all potential
piles at depths of 1. 25m and 7. 50 m from gradients on the ground surface had practi-
the top of pile, to examine the effect of cally vanished, indicating that these electric
cathodic protection by sacrificial anodes. currents were now, no longer present.
The pile-to-soil potentials were measured Examination of 'withdrawn piles revealed
when the potentials stabilized at about three that: (1) the aluminum anodes attached at
months after the installation of piles and the depth of 7. 5 m were completely consumed
footings'~ The measurement was performed (at the times of first and second withdrawals,
as shown in Fig. 15, i.e., a saturated copper- the consumption of aluminum was approxi-

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 69

mately 70'"'"'80% and 90'"'"'95%, respectively),


DEPTH MEAN CORROSION RATE (MM/YR}
(2) on the contrary, the anodes at the depth (M} o o.os
of 1. 25m were still intact (probably because
of the high resistivity of the surrounding,
dry fills), and (3) the surface of protected
piles was locally covered, with a thin, silver-
colored film.
The corrosion rates are as shown in Fig. 17.
The effects of capping by a reinforced concrete
footing are analyzed in Table 8, indicating no
undesirable effect of macro-coupling between
the steel pile and the reinforcing bar. 10
Rather, the presence· of footing shows
a tendency to reduce the corrosion of steel 12
piles by limiting the access of atmospheric
oxygen to the steel surface. 14
The effects of cathodic protection by a
sacrificial anodes system are shown in Table 16 .,1__ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - '

9, in which also the results at the times Fig. 18. Mean corrosion rates at
of the first and second withdrawals are added each time of withdrawal
for comparison. It is interesting but not 0.10

readily interpretable to note that, while the


sacrificial anodes had been almost consumed ~ o.oa
5 years after the installation without signif- !
icant protective effect, but this did become i 0.06
2
evident in another 5 years.
j
U
0.04

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 0.02

In this chapter, the test results are sum- +

marized to survey the corrosion behavior of 0 5 10 15


steel piles, and some statistical analyses are YEARS AFTER DRIVING

made, to seek any correlations between the Fig.l9. Change of corrosion rates with time
corrosion rate and the various soil pa- withdrawal are plotted against the depth
rameters. The following discussions are en- from the ground surface. The overall mean
tirely based on the three-starred, significant of the corrosion rates after 10 years is
values of corrosion rate, the probability of 0. 0106 mm/year per both faces of the steel
statistical significance of which is 99. 9%. pile, and the standard deviation 0. 0051 mm/
year per both faces.
Mean Corrosion Rates
The number of years after driving of each Change of Corrosion Rates with Time
withdrawal differs a little at differenct sta- The overall means of corrosion rates at 2,
tions in the ranges: 5, and 10 years are represented by the three
years years curves in Fig. 18 and tabulated in Table 10.
First withdrawal 1. 95-- 2. 54 Mean 2.14 In the Table, the maximum corrosion rates
Second 11 4.50-- 6.13 5.00 in all measurement zones in all test piles at
Third 11 9.26--13.69 10.17 each time of withdrawal are also shown.
In Fig. 18, the mean values of the cor- The mean corrosion rates (Table 10), to-
rosion rates of all test piles at each time of gether with the maximum values at each.

NII-Electronic Library Service


70 OHSAKI

Table 10. Change of corrosion rates 0.03


with time
""
,;tfe:_"0~~:r.:,j
Corrosion Rate (mm/yr)
Withdrawal!
Mean 1

I
M ax1mum
. I
1
S D
_~·~· _
*5 0.02
First 2.14 0. 0351 0. 0955 0. 0172
Second 5. 00 0. 0275 0. 0589 0. 0136
Third 10.17 0. 0106 0. 0297 0.0051
0.01
S.D. =Standard Deviation

station, are plotted against the length of


years from driving to withdrawal in Fig.
19, which shows the change of corrosion cc sc cs ss
(CLAY) (SANDY ClAY) (CLAYEV SAND) (SAND)
rates with time. The hatched line in Fig. 19
Fig. 20. Corrosion rates and soil types
represents the upper boundary of the meas-
0.03
ured corrosion rates.
It is evident from Fig. 19 that both mean
and maximum corrosion rates decrease grad-
ually with time after driving. Further, it
is certain that the rate will become smaller
in the future, whereas the data may not be
adequate to describe the time-change of
corrosion rates. All discussions and recom-
mendations, therefore, will be based on the
results of measurements at the third with-
0 10 20 30
drawal, about 10 years after driving.
H-VALUE

Fig. 21. Corrosion rates and N-values


Effects of Soil Parameters
Depth : The changes of the corrosion rates clay, respectively, and Kanto-Loam is clas-
with depth at individual stations have pre- sified as one of clay in view of its cohesive
viously been given in the figures appropriate nature.
to each station. Their averages for 2, 5, In Fig. 20, the corrosion rates vs. soil
and 10 years are represented in Fig. 18. From types are plotted, indicating that the rate
these figures, no definite trend is discernable is independent of the soil type and, there-
with respect to the effect of depth upon corro- fore, it may probably be independent of the
sion. It should be noted, however, that the permeability of soil as well.
corrosion rate in the aerated zone within ap- N-Value :The corrosion rates are plotted in
proximately 2. 5 to 3 m of the ground surface Fig. 21 against N-values of the standard
is a little larger than the rest. penetration test at the level of each measure-
Soil Type: As mentioned before, the test ment zone to examine the effect of relative
stations were selected so that soil conditions density or consistency of a soil deposit on its
differed as widely as possible, as given in corrosivity; however, the scatter of plotted
the soil profiles in the previous figures. · The points is quite arbitrary.
soils are broadly classified here in to four If a linear relationship
types (Ohsaki and Sakaguchi, 1973): v=a+bN (4)
clay symbol CC is assumed between the corrosion rate v(mm/
sandy clay SC year) and N-value, the coefficients deter-
clayey sand CS mined by the least square method are a=
sand SS 0. 0093 and b~O. The regression line of Eq.
Gravel and silt are regarded as sand and ( 4) thus determined is also represented in

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 71

0.03 X
0.10
a:
X
0.08
..,.v
~
X
X
1/ /
I / v;
X 0.06
5 0.02
X X X

~
51
8
...
!......
0.04

v VI ,i'l
~r-~1 Jv
v
X
)(

)(
0.01 ~ 0.02

0
X lE
X
""
2
"'
0

...""""
0
0.01
~ $' 1-7
5.00 6.00 7.00 e.oo 9.00 10.00
o.ooa I J I I
pH-VALUE
0.006 I I I I
Fig. 22. Corrosion rates and pH-values
I I I II
vj
0.03 X
0.004
II
) I VI
0:
X X

! )( ~ ~X X X

[7 [7, v v/
0.002
~ 0.02
~
~ .)
8 0.001
20 40 60 80 100
0.01 X
)( DEPOLARIZATION COEFFICIENT (t)
X
)( X
X xx Fig. 24. Corrosion rate as function of
~X
depolarization coefficient and resis-
20 40 60 eo 100
tivity of homogeneous Norwegian
DE?OLARIZATIOH COEFfiCIENT (I) clay (after Mourn 1960)
Fig. 23. Corrosion rates and depolarization 0.03 X
coefficients X

X X X X
X X X
Fig. 21; evidently, the corrosion rate 1s not
dependent on the N-value.
Hydrogen Exponent : The relation between
the corrosion rates and the hydrogen expo-
nent (pH) of the surrounding soil deposits
are plotted in Fig. 22, where no definite
correlation can be found because of a large
oL-----------L---------~----------_J
scatter of plotted points. The regression line 1 10 100 100~

between the corrosion rate v(mmjyear) and RESISTIVITY (11-m)

pH-value is Fig. 25. Corrosion rates and resistivities


v= -0. 00047(pH) +0. 01364
It has been stated as an established fact
This line is also drawn in Fig. 22, showing that the depolarization coefficient has a de-
a slight tendency to an increase of corrosiOn cisive influence on the corrosion of a steel
rate in an acid soil deposit. pile, as conveyed by Fig. 24 (Mourn, 1960);
Depolarization : The depolarization coeffi- however, such an influence can not be seen
cients of soil deposits were measured at all in Fig. 23.
test stations by means of the 'Corrosion Probe' The regression equation of a form of Eq.
from a Norwegian manufacturer (Mourn, (4) between the corrosion rate v(mm/year)
1960), and the correlation between the and the depolarization coefficient n(%) is.
corrosion rates and the depolarization coeffi- v= -0. 00002n+O. 01203
cients is as plotted in Fig. 23. indicating that the rate is almost constant

NII-Electronic Library Service


72 OHSAKI

Table 11. Coefficients of simple correlation between parameters


Corrosion
Depth I Soil Type I N-Value I pH Depolari-
zation
I Re sts
. t' 't I Estimated
lVl Y Rate*
Rate
I
Corrosion Rate 1. 0000 -0.0183 I -0.0841 0. 0409 -0.0773 -0.0791 -0.0424 0. 0368
--------
i I I I
Depth 1.0000 -0.4875 -0.1705 0.1350 0.2077 -0.3191 0. 2939
I I

Soil Type 1. 0000 0. 5002 -0.1052 -0.2381 0. 0183 -0.1970


I
N-Value 1. 0000 -c. 0392 -0.0600 0. 2441 -0.1335

pH 1. 0000 I 0.1700 -0.4433 0. 3522


Depolarization 1. 0000 -0.2976 0. 7954
(Symmetric) I
Resistivity 1. 0000 -0.6610

Estimated Rate* 1. 0000


* The corros10n rate estimated based on F1g. 24 from the depolarization coefficient and the resistivity measured by
the 'Corrosion Probe' is included among parameters and is referred to as 'estimated rate' in Tables 11 and 12

Correlation Analyses
Table 12. Coefficients of partial correlation
with corrosion rate In order to statistically investigate (Kendall
------~

and Stuart, 1973) the correlation between the


Parameter I Coefficient of Partial
Correlation
I Significance corrosion rate of a steel pile and the above
Depth -0.1354 ** mentioned soil parameters, i.e., depth, soil
Soil Type -0.2156 ** type, N-value, pH-value, depolarization
N-Value 0. 1698 **
coefficient, logarithm of resistivity, the coeffi-
pH -0.1672 **
Depolarization -0.2136 ** cients of simple correlation between each of
Resistivity -0.0561 * these parameters were first computed as shown
Estimated Rate 0.1570 ** in Table 11. Soil types can not be described
quantitatively, but the following 'soil type
or decreases slightly with mcrease of the factors' (Ohsaki and Sakaguchi, 1973) were
coefficient. simply assumed in the present analysis:
clay CC 0. 0000
Resistivity : The resistivity or the specific
sandy clay SC 0. 3333
resistance of a soil deposit has hitherto been
clayey sand CS 0. 6667
considered to be the most influential factor
sand SS 1. 0000
on the subsoil corrosion of steel and most
The first row in Table 11 represents the
of the test methods for corrosivity estimation
(Applegate, 1960; Rosenqvist, 1961; Stratful, coefficients of simple correlation between
the measured corrosion rates and soil pa-
1961; Water, 1952) have emphasized meas-
rameters; it is seen that all coefficients are
urement of the soil resistance. Fig. 24 also
quite small.
illustrates the importance assigned to resis-
tivity. If Table 11 is regarded as an 8 x 8 sym-
At all test stations, the subsoil resistivities metric determinant, the element at i-th row
were measured by the 'Corrosion Probe', and j-th column, riJ• represents a coef-
and the measured corrosion rates are plotted ficient of simple correlation between i-th
in Fig. 25 against logarithmic resistivities. and j-th parameters. Now, in the determi-
The points scatter extensively indicating nant, let the cofactor associated with an
that, contrary to expectation, the effect of element r iJ be denoted by RiJ; then,
resistivity is negligible so far as vertically R,u
(J . - --.~--~- (5)
driven steel piles are concerned. The regres- iJ- '\lRttRJJ
sion line between the corrosion rate v(mmf represents a coefficient of partial correlation
year) and the resistivity o(O · m) is between the i-th and j-th parameters, i. e.,
v= -0. 00025log 10 P+0. 01023 a coefficient of exclusive correlation between

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 73

Table 13. List of test results


Station
No.
I General Soil Condition Test Items Number of I Corrosion
Test Piles Rate(mm/yr)
1
I Alluvial clay Corrosion of SS 41 9
I 0. 0045
Corrosion of SS 41
Corrosion of copper steel 12 0.0114
2 Coastal reclaimed soils
Effect of cathodic protection
(impressed current system)
i

3 Two-layers of sand and silt Corrosion of SS 41 10 0.0116


4 Uniformly deposited loam Corrosion of SS 41 9 0. 0112
Corrosion of SS 41
Corrosion of weathering steel
5 Coastal reclaimed soils 15 0. 0083
Corrosion of welded joint
Influence of underground current
Corrosion of SS 41
6 I Gravel layer i Influence of ground-water flow
9 0. 0093
---
Corrosion of SS 41
Alternation of sand and clay Influence of leakage current from electric 12 0. 0148
7 layers railway
Effect of protection by painting
8 Lake-side reclaimed soils Corrosion of SS 41 9 0. 0094

Alternation of sand and silt Corrosion of SK 41


9 layers 11 0. 0061
Inside corrosion of pipe pile
Corrosion of SS 41
Influence of reinforcing bars in concrete
10 Coastal reclaimed soils footing 30 0. 0127
Effect of cathodic protection
(sacrificial anodes system)
----------------~--
Total 126 \ Mean 0. 0106

the i-th and j-th parameters, all other and then, by using v and t, a probability
parameters being fixed. If, therefore, i = 1 P is computed in the usual way. If the
is used in Eq. (5), it is evident that level of significance in Eq. (3) is again as-
sumed, the degrees of significance for the
{J -
lj- - vRRuR-;;
--------
11
j =2, 3, ···, 8 ( 6) present partial correlation are as shown in the
last column in Table 12, where no definite
yields the coefficient of partial correlation
correlation can be seen between the corro-
between the corrosion rate and soil pa-
sion rate and any of soil parameters being
rameters. The result of computation by Eq.
considered here.
(6) is listed in Table 12.
The significance test of a partial correlation
such as represented by the stars in Table
SUMMARY
12 can be performed by the t-distribution
Consideration of corrosion is essential for
method in a way that
deciding the feasibility of a steel pile foun-
v=n-k (degree of freedom)
dation for a structure; nevertheless, many
IPivll issues still remain unsolved at the present
t= -Vi--=p-2 time. The purpose of this research project
are first evaluated, where was to examine the state of corrosion and
k : total number of parameters measure the corrosion rates of steel piles
(k=8 in the present case) driven in natural soil deposits of widely
n : total number of measurements varied subsoil conditions, and to identify
IJ : coefficient of partial correlation, soil parameters which influence the extent

NII-Electronic Library Service


74 OHSAKI

of corrosion. was 0. 0106 mmfyear, implying that if


The research project was planned and per- a corrosion allowance of 2 millimeters is as-
formed so that soil conditions at test stations signed to a pile and it is assumed to con-
were as different as possible, and the method tinue to corrode at the same rate, this
of investigations was as standardized as sacrificial thickness would be expected to
possible in order to facilitate the comparison disappear in approximately 200 years.
and collation of obtained data with each (3) The maximum corrosion rate observed
other. in all test piles was 0. 0297 mm/year per both
A standard test pile was of 15m length, faces. Therefore, the most conservative rate
fabricated from plate and with L-shaped for design purposes would be 0. 03 mmfyear.
cross-section, 100 X 100 x 9 mm in nominal Since the standard deviation of the corrosion
size; actual thicknesses were pre-measured rates measured at all stations was approxi-
accurately by means of a micrometer. The mately a=O. 005 mm/year, the above value
test piles were driven in to soil deposits of 0. 03 mm/year corresponds to the mean
during 1962 to 1966 at 10 stations in various rate plus 4 a.
parts of Japan; the total number and the ( 4) The corrosion rate definitely decreases
total length of test piles amounted to 126 with time after driving. The above values
and 1. 93 km, respectively. are all based on the results of measurement
Before driving the test piles, a bore hole at 10 years, and this will reduce further.
was drilled at each station to obtain infor- (5) If this fact is taken into account,
mation on the soil formation and the ground the mean value plus 2 a or 0. 02 mmfyear
water level, and soil parameters such as may be recommended as a corrosion rate
density, resistivity, depolarization coefficient, adequate for design purposes.
hydrogen exponent etc. were measured in (6) Contrary to the conventional idea
the bore hole. that the inner face of a pipe pile develops no
The general soil conditions, the principal appreciable corrosion, measurements indicate
test items and the number of test piles at that the inner corrosion was about the same
each test station are summarized in Table 13. as that of the outer face, although the
One-third of the test piles thus driven at amount of data was less than was desirable.
each station were withdrawn approximately Because of this fact, corrosion rate through-
2, 5, and 10 years after driving, and the final out this paper is expressed as the total loss
withdrawal at 10 years was completed in 1975. in thickness from both faces of a steel pile.
Immediately after the withdrawal, a visual (7) Based on the present test results, the
examination of the corroded state was made correlations between the corrosion of a steel
and the thicknesses of the test piles were pile and subsoil surroundings are as follows:
re-measured to evaluate the corrosion rates. i) Depth- Corrosion effects are somewhat
Important findings from the test results larger than the rest in the first 3m from
can be summarized as follows: the ground surface, where oxygen would
(1) In general, the corrosion of a steel have some access to a steel pile. Below this
pile driven in a natural soil deposit was far aerated zone, the corrosion rate is independ-
less than anticipated. Most of the withdrawn ent of depth.
piles were almost in an as-new condition ii) Soil Type - The corrosion rate is not
even at 10 years after driving, except the affected by the soil type or permeability,
portion in the aerated zone near the ground even between such soil types as clay, silt,
surface. sand or gravel. On the other hand, the rate
(2) The mean corrosion rate per year exhibits considerable variation in a soil layer
per both faces averaged over 10 years at which is apparently quite uniform.
each station is given in the last column in iii) Boundary of Layers- Even at a bound-
Table 13. The overall mean for all stations ary of two layers of extremely different

NII-Electronic Library Service


CORROSION OF STEEL PILES 75

soil types such as silt-to-sand, clay-to-grav- corrosion rate at an arc-welded joint was by
el, the corrosion rate is not particularly about 30% larger than that of the base
large when compared with that in the other metal; however, because technical factors
layers. prevented accurate measurement, the quanti-
iv) N-V alue- No correlation is observable tative accuracy cannot necessarily be war-
between the N-value of the standard ranted. That the weld is slightly more cor-
penetration test and the corrosion rate, rodible than the base metal would be a
whether the soil is cohesive or cohesionless. reasonable interpretation.
v) Ground Water- No particular increase iii) Cold working of a steel plate by
in the corrosion rate was observed in a soil bending quickens undercutting of millscale
layer where a rapid ground water flow is somewhat, but is practically harmless.
ordinarily present and where the ground (9) Cathodic protection by an impressed
water table fluctuates seasonally. In a case current system has only a slight effect on the
where the soil deposit had recently been re- corrosion of a steel pile. Cathodic protection
claimed and the pore water is still consid- by a sacrificial anodes system was detectable
erably saline, the corrosion rate was a little for the first time at 10 years after driving,
larger. If, however, the ground water has when, however, the anodes had been com-
been replenished after reclamation, even pletely consumed. The effect of protection
soil in coastal reclaimed land was not partic- by painting was not ascertained; however,
ularly aggressive. little may be expected from painting with
vi) pH-Value- If the pore water has a coaltar-epoxy resin with a thickness of 0. 45
low pH-value, the corrosion rate tends to mm as in this research program.
increase slightly, but the tendency is of no (10) Electric current from a macro-cell
significance. formed between steel piles and reinforcing
vii) Depolarization Coefficient- Contrary bars in a concrete footing placed upon the
to literature statements, no correlation is piling was observed immediately after the
present between the corrosion rate and the installation; however, neither steel piles nor
depolarization coefficient, which represents reinforcing bars underwent any adverse
the quantity of oxygen present in the pore changes. Rather, the installation of the
water as a cathodic depolariser. footing had a protective effect on the cor-
viii) Resistivity- The influence of electrical rosion at the top part of a pile by hindering
resistivity of the surroundings has previously the access of atmospheric oxygen.
been emphasized to the effect that low (11) As previously mentioned, no soil
resistivity invariably leads to high corrosion. parameter decisively governing the extent of
The present test results indicate no distinct corrosion could be found by correlation
correlation between the corrosion rate and analyses; consequently, it is difficult to point
the resistivity. out any effective means for prediction of the
ix) Underground Current- It may be corrosion rate.
necessary, for the sake of conservatism, to Fortunately, however, the corrosion rate
assume that underground leakage current itself is so small, regardless of soil condition,
causes some increase of corrosion at a short that no serious consequence would be en-
distance from a direct-current railway line. countered if a slightly thicker cross-section
(8) In regard to material properties of is chosen at the design stage to accommodate
steel, the following can be mentioned: a sacrificial thickness for anticipated corrosion
i) The effect of corrosion-resistant mate- losses.
rials such as copper steel or weathering
steel can not be detected when used as a
piling material. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ii) The test results indicated that the This research was performed as one of the

NII-Electronic Library Service


76 OHSAKI

feasibility studies of steel piles at the with steel pile foundations to rock," J. Boston
Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Soc. Civil Eng., Vol. 44, No.3.
Foundation Engineering, and was financially 3) Eadie, G. R. (1977) : "Corrosion of steel piling-
supported by Nippon Steel Corporation, Results from a test at Burnley, Victoria,"
BHP Technical Bulletin, Vol. 21, No.2,
Nippon Kokan K. K., Kawasaki Steel Corpo-
Melbourne.
ration, Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd.,
4) Greulich, G. G. (1950) : "Extracted steel H-
Kobe Steel, Ltd., and the Kozai Club. Also, piles found in good condition," Eng. News-
the Japanese Association for Steel Pipe Piles Record, Vol. 145, No. 8.
supported and encouraged the continuation 5) Kendall, M.G. and Stuart, A. (1973) : The
of this research project. The author wishes Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2, 3 Ed.,
to express his grateful thanks to these Griffin Co. Ltd., London, pp. 330-332.
organizations. 6) Kinson, K. and Eadie, G. R. (1980) : "Letter to
The author is also indebted to Dr. H. C. the editor," Chemistry and Industry, July
Coe, Director, and Mr. K. Kinson, Senior 5th, p. 518.
7) Mourn, J. (1960) : Korrosionssonde zur Ermitt-
Research Officer, Melbourne Research Labo-
lung der Korrosivitiit von Erdarten gegeniiber
ratories, the Broken Hill Proprietary Co.
Eisen und Stahl, Geonor Soil Mechanics
Ltd., Australia, for their personal assistance Inc., Norway.
in editing the manuscript of this paper. 8) Ohsaki, Y. (1969) : Steel Piles, Japanese Soc.
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
NOTATION pp. 215-255.
9) Ohsaki, Y. (1972) : "Interim report on corro-
a, b=constants
sion of steel piles driven in soil deposits,"
k=total number of parameters
5th International Congress on Metallic Cor-
n =depolarization coefficient in percent, total
rosion, Tokyo.
number of measurements
10) Ohsaki, Y. and Sakaguchi, 0. (1973) : "Major
N =number of blows per foot in standard pene-
types of soil deposits in urban areas in Japan,"
tration test
Soils and Foundations, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 49-
P=probability of difference from random varia-
65.
tion
pH =hydrogen exponent 11) Romanoff, M. (1962) : Corrosion of Steel
ri.i=element in a determinant Pilings in Soils, National Bureau of Standards
R-u=cofactor associated with element rij Monograph 58, pp. 1-22.
t =statistic in t-distribu tion test
12) Rosenqvist, I. Th. (1961) : Subsoil Corrosion
T=time from driving to withdrawal in years of Steel, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute,
v =corrosion rate in millimeters/year per both Publication No. 42, pp. 51-71.
faces 13) Stratful, R. F. (1961) :"A new test for esti-
.x=mean value of thicknesses in a measurement mating soil corrosivity based on investigation
zone after withdrawal in millimeters of metal highway culverts," Corrosion, pp.
.x 0 =mean value of thicknesses in the same zone 115-118 .
prior to driving in millimeters 14) Walpole, R. E. and Myers, R. H. (1978) : Prob-
J.x=difference of mean thicknesses at driving and ability and Statistics for Engineers and Sci-
withdrawal in millimeters entists, 2 Ed. MacMillan Publishing Co.,
v =degrees of freedom in t-distribution test Inc., New York, pp.174-177.
p=resistivity in ohm·meter, coefficient of partial 15) Water, F. 0. (1952) : "Soil resistivity measure-
correlation ments for corrosion control," Corrosion,
Pii= coefficient of partial correlation National Association of Corrosion Engineers,
Vol. 8, pp. 407-409.
16) Wilson, D. M., Johnston, R. R. M. and Lloyd, C.
REFERENCES P. (1973) : Piling Investigation at West Mel-
1) Applegate, L. M. (1960) : Cathodic Protection, bourne, Conference 14, Australasian Corro-
McGraw-Hill, New York. sion Association, Brisbane.
2) Bjerrum, L. (1957) : "Norwegian experience

NII-Electronic Library Service

You might also like