Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1982
Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
Y ORIHIKO 0HSAKI*
ABSTRACT
About 130 steel piles of 15m length with L-shaped cross-section were driven into natural
soil deposits at 10 stations for corrosion tests under a wide variety of soil conditions. Prior
to driving, thicknesses of the test piles were measured and physical, chemical and electro-
chemical characteristics of the soil deposits were investigated. The piles were withdrawn
approximately 2, 5, and 10 years after driving and the corrosion rates were evaluated.
The test results obtained in this 10 years research indicate that
( 1) the withdrawn piles were generally in excellent condition, corrosion effects were
minimal and independent of soil condition,
( 2) the average corrosion rate was approximately 0. 01 mmfyear per both faces of a pile
over the period of 10 years,
( 3) the corrosion of the inner face of a pipe pile seems to be the same as the outer face,
( 4) it is difficult to find any particular soil parameter which influenced the corrosion rate
most decisively, and
( 5) any effect on corrosion of steel composition (mild steel, copper-bearing steel or
weathering steel), cathodic protection or protection by painting was not evident. Influences
of welding, cold-working, and underground electric leakage current were insignificant.
Key words : ~orrosjQ!!_, design, :field test, natural ground, pile, statistical analysis, steel
(IGC : D 2/C 8/H 1)
STATION N0.8 - - - - - . .
HACHIROGATA RECLAIMED
LAND
STATION N0.9 - - - - - - - . .
TAKESATO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION
STATION N0.7 - - - - - - - - - - .
TAKENOTSUKA HOUSING DEVELOP~1ENT
JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION
STATION N0.6 - - - - - . .
KAJIMA INSTITUTE OF
CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY
STATION N0.3 - - - - - . . .
ENGINEERING CAMPUS
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
STATION N0.1
UMAYABASHI SUBSTATION
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO.
STATION N0.4
SAGAMIHARA RESEARCH INST.
NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
STATION N0.5
AMAGASAKI STEAM-POWER PLANT
KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER CO.
z-
-
-
w SANDY
SILT 't> ...3..-
~<: SILT\'
4
4 -
,5~ SAND
!--
-_:--_
( 6
6 8
r=--=--
r-:::::::-
f---
8 - !-::::
_-_;:
l 10
-1-_-...:: 12
1--
10- ,_:-...:- SILT
~----=-
~---=-
14
r--...:::.
r---=-
12 - -:.._-_ 16
- r---=---
!--:.:-
14
~---=--
~-:::
-;:-~-
.i I
18
20
SAND
GRAVEL
~-~ i
Fig. 3. Corrosion rates at Station - SS41 -COPPER STEEL === CATHOD. PROTECT.
No.1
Fig. 4. Corrosion rates at Station
rate, and the latter was not unduly high No.2
even at the boundary between clayey soil and
Table 3. Effects of cathodic protection
sandy gravel around a depth of 17. 5 m,
(Impressed current system)
which had been anticipated to be the worst
condition. This was supported also by visual Material
Mean Corrosion Rate (mm/yr) ISignifi·
examination of the withdrawn piles. IUnprotected I Protected Difference
f cance
The test piles in this station were divided ss 41 I o. 0105 I o. 0084 I o. 0021 I **
into two groups; one group was unpro- Copper Steel 0. 0108 ~ 0. 0103-----~~~005 *
tected and the other had been under con-
Table 4. Effects of copper steel
trolled cathodic protection from an impressed
current system since the time of driving. The
Proteotion I
Mean Corrosion Rate (mmi;r) Signifi- I
two groups had been driven about 60 m SS 41 I Copper Steel IDifference cance
found sufficient for the unprotected group Protected o. oo84 o. o103 1 - o. oo19 **
not to be influenced by the impressed current
on the protected group. The pile-to-soil Furthermore, the test piles were grouped
potential was maintained within the range in accordance with their material, i.e., car-
of -820 to -940 m V, exceeding the protec- bon steel (SS 41) or steel containing 0. 26%
tive potential of -770mV. On the other Cu. From Fig. 4 or Table 4, however, the
hand, measurement at the time of the copper constituent can be seen to have no
first withdrawal indicated that the poten- effect on the reduction of underground cor-
tials of unprotected piles were -660 to -670 rosion, or the effect is possibly adverse when
mV. cathodic protection is applied.
From a comparison of two groups in Fig. The oxidation-reduction (Redox) potentials
4 or in Table 3, it seems that a slight in the soil deposit were in the range of
effect only due to the cathodic protection +346 to +528 m V and corrosion by anaerobic
may be observed. bacteria was not anticipated.
table near the ground surface as shown in STATION N0.3 ENGINEERING CAMPUS
Fig. 5. As also shown in Fig. 5, the corrosion HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
rates were low over the entire length of the DEPTH CORROSION RATE (MM/YR)
(M) SOIL
piles, and no difference can be seen between 0 .01 .02 .03
STAT! ON NO.5 AMAGASAKI STEAM-POWER PLANT STATION N0.6 KAJIMA INSTITUTE OF CONSTRUCTION
KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER CO. TECHNOLOGY
8
RANGE OF GROUND
WATER LEVEL
10
14
---WEATHERING STEEL
Fig. 8. Corrosion rates at Station
Fig. 7. Corrosion rates at Station No.6
No.5
ference is insignificant because of the large
Table 6. Comparison of corrosion rates
scatter of thicknesses in the welded zones.
at welded and base portions
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 STATION N0.7 TAKENOTSUKA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
JAPAN HOUSING CORPORATION
1Z
1970 1971 197Z 1973 1974
6 .>{.
8
.8
10
12
14
- - - - INSIDE
Fig.l3. Corrosion rates at Station No.9
Table 7. Comparison of corrosion rates at inner and outer
surfaces of pipe pile
Years after
Driving
I Mean Corro•ion Rate (mm/yr)
Significance
Outer Surface I Inner Surface I Difference
2.30 years 0. 0281 0. 0341 -0.0060 *
4.50years 0. 0276 0. 0312 -0.0036 *
9.36years 0.0062 0.0057 0. 0005 *
POTENTIOMF:TER
-----,I -------,I
I I
--------,
I
I
I I I
I I I
- v b,.
...: 600
;:: ~ SAND
ffi 2 FILL
t-
_V
.•
....
C>
400
4
WITH FOOTING 6
800 WITHOUT ANODE
~
._
600
& r--.. ..._ - 1-" t-~ll
~
8
v~~
1/ 10
-t;; /~l/
400
/
~ l-- 12
14
WITHOUT FOOTING
WITHOUT ANODE
,~1-+-
--
_ _ WITHOUT WITH lo.'ITH FOOTING
800 FOOTING FOOTING CATHOD. PROTECT.
Fig.17. Corrosion rates at Station
t- vv
I'=" f'
!/ t-..... No.lO
600 ........
9, in which also the results at the times Fig. 18. Mean corrosion rates at
of the first and second withdrawals are added each time of withdrawal
for comparison. It is interesting but not 0.10
made, to seek any correlations between the Fig.l9. Change of corrosion rates with time
corrosion rate and the various soil pa- withdrawal are plotted against the depth
rameters. The following discussions are en- from the ground surface. The overall mean
tirely based on the three-starred, significant of the corrosion rates after 10 years is
values of corrosion rate, the probability of 0. 0106 mm/year per both faces of the steel
statistical significance of which is 99. 9%. pile, and the standard deviation 0. 0051 mm/
year per both faces.
Mean Corrosion Rates
The number of years after driving of each Change of Corrosion Rates with Time
withdrawal differs a little at differenct sta- The overall means of corrosion rates at 2,
tions in the ranges: 5, and 10 years are represented by the three
years years curves in Fig. 18 and tabulated in Table 10.
First withdrawal 1. 95-- 2. 54 Mean 2.14 In the Table, the maximum corrosion rates
Second 11 4.50-- 6.13 5.00 in all measurement zones in all test piles at
Third 11 9.26--13.69 10.17 each time of withdrawal are also shown.
In Fig. 18, the mean values of the cor- The mean corrosion rates (Table 10), to-
rosion rates of all test piles at each time of gether with the maximum values at each.
I
M ax1mum
. I
1
S D
_~·~· _
*5 0.02
First 2.14 0. 0351 0. 0955 0. 0172
Second 5. 00 0. 0275 0. 0589 0. 0136
Third 10.17 0. 0106 0. 0297 0.0051
0.01
S.D. =Standard Deviation
0.03 X
0.10
a:
X
0.08
..,.v
~
X
X
1/ /
I / v;
X 0.06
5 0.02
X X X
~
51
8
...
!......
0.04
v VI ,i'l
~r-~1 Jv
v
X
)(
)(
0.01 ~ 0.02
0
X lE
X
""
2
"'
0
...""""
0
0.01
~ $' 1-7
5.00 6.00 7.00 e.oo 9.00 10.00
o.ooa I J I I
pH-VALUE
0.006 I I I I
Fig. 22. Corrosion rates and pH-values
I I I II
vj
0.03 X
0.004
II
) I VI
0:
X X
! )( ~ ~X X X
[7 [7, v v/
0.002
~ 0.02
~
~ .)
8 0.001
20 40 60 80 100
0.01 X
)( DEPOLARIZATION COEFFICIENT (t)
X
)( X
X xx Fig. 24. Corrosion rate as function of
~X
depolarization coefficient and resis-
20 40 60 eo 100
tivity of homogeneous Norwegian
DE?OLARIZATIOH COEFfiCIENT (I) clay (after Mourn 1960)
Fig. 23. Corrosion rates and depolarization 0.03 X
coefficients X
X X X X
X X X
Fig. 21; evidently, the corrosion rate 1s not
dependent on the N-value.
Hydrogen Exponent : The relation between
the corrosion rates and the hydrogen expo-
nent (pH) of the surrounding soil deposits
are plotted in Fig. 22, where no definite
correlation can be found because of a large
oL-----------L---------~----------_J
scatter of plotted points. The regression line 1 10 100 100~
Correlation Analyses
Table 12. Coefficients of partial correlation
with corrosion rate In order to statistically investigate (Kendall
------~
the i-th and j-th parameters, all other and then, by using v and t, a probability
parameters being fixed. If, therefore, i = 1 P is computed in the usual way. If the
is used in Eq. (5), it is evident that level of significance in Eq. (3) is again as-
sumed, the degrees of significance for the
{J -
lj- - vRRuR-;;
--------
11
j =2, 3, ···, 8 ( 6) present partial correlation are as shown in the
last column in Table 12, where no definite
yields the coefficient of partial correlation
correlation can be seen between the corro-
between the corrosion rate and soil pa-
sion rate and any of soil parameters being
rameters. The result of computation by Eq.
considered here.
(6) is listed in Table 12.
The significance test of a partial correlation
such as represented by the stars in Table
SUMMARY
12 can be performed by the t-distribution
Consideration of corrosion is essential for
method in a way that
deciding the feasibility of a steel pile foun-
v=n-k (degree of freedom)
dation for a structure; nevertheless, many
IPivll issues still remain unsolved at the present
t= -Vi--=p-2 time. The purpose of this research project
are first evaluated, where was to examine the state of corrosion and
k : total number of parameters measure the corrosion rates of steel piles
(k=8 in the present case) driven in natural soil deposits of widely
n : total number of measurements varied subsoil conditions, and to identify
IJ : coefficient of partial correlation, soil parameters which influence the extent
soil types such as silt-to-sand, clay-to-grav- corrosion rate at an arc-welded joint was by
el, the corrosion rate is not particularly about 30% larger than that of the base
large when compared with that in the other metal; however, because technical factors
layers. prevented accurate measurement, the quanti-
iv) N-V alue- No correlation is observable tative accuracy cannot necessarily be war-
between the N-value of the standard ranted. That the weld is slightly more cor-
penetration test and the corrosion rate, rodible than the base metal would be a
whether the soil is cohesive or cohesionless. reasonable interpretation.
v) Ground Water- No particular increase iii) Cold working of a steel plate by
in the corrosion rate was observed in a soil bending quickens undercutting of millscale
layer where a rapid ground water flow is somewhat, but is practically harmless.
ordinarily present and where the ground (9) Cathodic protection by an impressed
water table fluctuates seasonally. In a case current system has only a slight effect on the
where the soil deposit had recently been re- corrosion of a steel pile. Cathodic protection
claimed and the pore water is still consid- by a sacrificial anodes system was detectable
erably saline, the corrosion rate was a little for the first time at 10 years after driving,
larger. If, however, the ground water has when, however, the anodes had been com-
been replenished after reclamation, even pletely consumed. The effect of protection
soil in coastal reclaimed land was not partic- by painting was not ascertained; however,
ularly aggressive. little may be expected from painting with
vi) pH-Value- If the pore water has a coaltar-epoxy resin with a thickness of 0. 45
low pH-value, the corrosion rate tends to mm as in this research program.
increase slightly, but the tendency is of no (10) Electric current from a macro-cell
significance. formed between steel piles and reinforcing
vii) Depolarization Coefficient- Contrary bars in a concrete footing placed upon the
to literature statements, no correlation is piling was observed immediately after the
present between the corrosion rate and the installation; however, neither steel piles nor
depolarization coefficient, which represents reinforcing bars underwent any adverse
the quantity of oxygen present in the pore changes. Rather, the installation of the
water as a cathodic depolariser. footing had a protective effect on the cor-
viii) Resistivity- The influence of electrical rosion at the top part of a pile by hindering
resistivity of the surroundings has previously the access of atmospheric oxygen.
been emphasized to the effect that low (11) As previously mentioned, no soil
resistivity invariably leads to high corrosion. parameter decisively governing the extent of
The present test results indicate no distinct corrosion could be found by correlation
correlation between the corrosion rate and analyses; consequently, it is difficult to point
the resistivity. out any effective means for prediction of the
ix) Underground Current- It may be corrosion rate.
necessary, for the sake of conservatism, to Fortunately, however, the corrosion rate
assume that underground leakage current itself is so small, regardless of soil condition,
causes some increase of corrosion at a short that no serious consequence would be en-
distance from a direct-current railway line. countered if a slightly thicker cross-section
(8) In regard to material properties of is chosen at the design stage to accommodate
steel, the following can be mentioned: a sacrificial thickness for anticipated corrosion
i) The effect of corrosion-resistant mate- losses.
rials such as copper steel or weathering
steel can not be detected when used as a
piling material. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ii) The test results indicated that the This research was performed as one of the
feasibility studies of steel piles at the with steel pile foundations to rock," J. Boston
Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Soc. Civil Eng., Vol. 44, No.3.
Foundation Engineering, and was financially 3) Eadie, G. R. (1977) : "Corrosion of steel piling-
supported by Nippon Steel Corporation, Results from a test at Burnley, Victoria,"
BHP Technical Bulletin, Vol. 21, No.2,
Nippon Kokan K. K., Kawasaki Steel Corpo-
Melbourne.
ration, Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd.,
4) Greulich, G. G. (1950) : "Extracted steel H-
Kobe Steel, Ltd., and the Kozai Club. Also, piles found in good condition," Eng. News-
the Japanese Association for Steel Pipe Piles Record, Vol. 145, No. 8.
supported and encouraged the continuation 5) Kendall, M.G. and Stuart, A. (1973) : The
of this research project. The author wishes Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2, 3 Ed.,
to express his grateful thanks to these Griffin Co. Ltd., London, pp. 330-332.
organizations. 6) Kinson, K. and Eadie, G. R. (1980) : "Letter to
The author is also indebted to Dr. H. C. the editor," Chemistry and Industry, July
Coe, Director, and Mr. K. Kinson, Senior 5th, p. 518.
7) Mourn, J. (1960) : Korrosionssonde zur Ermitt-
Research Officer, Melbourne Research Labo-
lung der Korrosivitiit von Erdarten gegeniiber
ratories, the Broken Hill Proprietary Co.
Eisen und Stahl, Geonor Soil Mechanics
Ltd., Australia, for their personal assistance Inc., Norway.
in editing the manuscript of this paper. 8) Ohsaki, Y. (1969) : Steel Piles, Japanese Soc.
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
NOTATION pp. 215-255.
9) Ohsaki, Y. (1972) : "Interim report on corro-
a, b=constants
sion of steel piles driven in soil deposits,"
k=total number of parameters
5th International Congress on Metallic Cor-
n =depolarization coefficient in percent, total
rosion, Tokyo.
number of measurements
10) Ohsaki, Y. and Sakaguchi, 0. (1973) : "Major
N =number of blows per foot in standard pene-
types of soil deposits in urban areas in Japan,"
tration test
Soils and Foundations, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 49-
P=probability of difference from random varia-
65.
tion
pH =hydrogen exponent 11) Romanoff, M. (1962) : Corrosion of Steel
ri.i=element in a determinant Pilings in Soils, National Bureau of Standards
R-u=cofactor associated with element rij Monograph 58, pp. 1-22.
t =statistic in t-distribu tion test
12) Rosenqvist, I. Th. (1961) : Subsoil Corrosion
T=time from driving to withdrawal in years of Steel, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute,
v =corrosion rate in millimeters/year per both Publication No. 42, pp. 51-71.
faces 13) Stratful, R. F. (1961) :"A new test for esti-
.x=mean value of thicknesses in a measurement mating soil corrosivity based on investigation
zone after withdrawal in millimeters of metal highway culverts," Corrosion, pp.
.x 0 =mean value of thicknesses in the same zone 115-118 .
prior to driving in millimeters 14) Walpole, R. E. and Myers, R. H. (1978) : Prob-
J.x=difference of mean thicknesses at driving and ability and Statistics for Engineers and Sci-
withdrawal in millimeters entists, 2 Ed. MacMillan Publishing Co.,
v =degrees of freedom in t-distribution test Inc., New York, pp.174-177.
p=resistivity in ohm·meter, coefficient of partial 15) Water, F. 0. (1952) : "Soil resistivity measure-
correlation ments for corrosion control," Corrosion,
Pii= coefficient of partial correlation National Association of Corrosion Engineers,
Vol. 8, pp. 407-409.
16) Wilson, D. M., Johnston, R. R. M. and Lloyd, C.
REFERENCES P. (1973) : Piling Investigation at West Mel-
1) Applegate, L. M. (1960) : Cathodic Protection, bourne, Conference 14, Australasian Corro-
McGraw-Hill, New York. sion Association, Brisbane.
2) Bjerrum, L. (1957) : "Norwegian experience