The document summarizes Republic Act No. 1425, also known as the Rizal Law, which mandates the teaching of Jose Rizal's life and works in schools. It describes the context after World War 2 where nation-building was a priority. It then outlines the debates in the Senate and House of Representatives around the bill, including opposition from the Catholic Church. After amendments removing mandatory reading of Rizal's novels, both chambers approved the bill, which was signed into law by President Magsaysay on June 12, 1956.
The document summarizes Republic Act No. 1425, also known as the Rizal Law, which mandates the teaching of Jose Rizal's life and works in schools. It describes the context after World War 2 where nation-building was a priority. It then outlines the debates in the Senate and House of Representatives around the bill, including opposition from the Catholic Church. After amendments removing mandatory reading of Rizal's novels, both chambers approved the bill, which was signed into law by President Magsaysay on June 12, 1956.
The document summarizes Republic Act No. 1425, also known as the Rizal Law, which mandates the teaching of Jose Rizal's life and works in schools. It describes the context after World War 2 where nation-building was a priority. It then outlines the debates in the Senate and House of Representatives around the bill, including opposition from the Catholic Church. After amendments removing mandatory reading of Rizal's novels, both chambers approved the bill, which was signed into law by President Magsaysay on June 12, 1956.
with the emphasis on his landmark novels is inscribed in legislation
Republic Act No. 1425 , more popularly
known as the Rizal Law, was passed in 1956 leaving a colorful narrative of debate and contestation UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
The Context of the Rizal Bill : the post war
period saw a Philippines rife with challenges and problems With a country torn and tired from the stresses of World War II, getting up on their feet was a paramount concern of the people and the government UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
As the Philippines grappled with various
challenges, particularly the call for nation -building , prominent individuals who championed nationalism came into action They pursued government measures to instill patriotism and love for country in the hearts and minds of the Filipinos UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
The people drew inspiration from
the Philippine experience of the revolution for independence against Spain and from the heroes of that important period in the country’s history UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
One measure sought was the passage of the
Republic Act No 1425 or the Rizal Law, which was primarily set to “address a need for a re- dedication to the ideals of freedom and nationalism for which our heroes lived and died” The passage of the law was met with fierce opposition in both Senate and the House of Representative UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
From the Rizal Bill to the Rizal Law:
On April 3, 1956, Senate bill No 438 was filed by the Senate Committee on Education On April 17, 1956 , then Senate Committee on Education Chair Jose P. Laurel sponsored the bill and began delivering speeches for the proposed legislation UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
Soon after , the bill became controversial as the
powerful Catholic Church began to express opposition against its passage As the influence of the Church was felt with members of the Senate voicing their opposition to the bill, its main author, Claro M . Recto , and his allies in the Senate entered into a fierce battle arguing for the passage of SB 438 UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
The debates on the Rizal Bill also ensued in the
House of Representatives House Bill No 56 , an identical version of SB 438, was filed by Representative Jacobo Z. Gonzales on April 19, 1956 The House Committee on Education approved the bill without amendments on May 2, 1956 and the debates commenced on May 9, 1956 UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
A major point of the debates was
whether the compulsory reading of the texts Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo appropriated in the bill was constitutional The call to read the unexpurgated versions were also challenged UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW As the country was soon engaged in the debate , it seemed that an impasse was reached To move the procedure to the next step, Senator Jose P. Laurel proposed amendments to the bill on May 9, 1956 In particular, he removed the compulsory reading of Rizal’s novels and added that Rizal’s other works must also be included in the subject UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
He, however, remained adamant in
his stand that the unexpurgated versions of the novels be read On May 14, 1956, similar amendments were adopted to the House version UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
The amended version of the bills was also
subjected to scrutiny but seemed palatable to the members of Congress The passage, however, was almost hijacked by technicality since the house of Representatives was about to adjourn in a few days and President Ramon Magsaysay did not certify the bills as priority UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
The allies in the House skillfully avoided the
insertion of any other amendment to prevent the need to reprint new copies They also asked the Bureau of Printing to use the same templates for the Senate version in printing the House version Thus, on May 17, 1956, the Senate and House versions were approved UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW
The approved version were then
transmitted to Malacanang and on June 12, 1956, President Magsaysay signed the Bill into law which became Republic Act No. 1425