Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ass 3
Ass 3
Atienza
HR_Asynch3
1.
a. WON detention without warrant of arrest under Section 29 of the ATA is unconstitutional
for being an executive warrant of arrest.
No. When properly interpreted, Section 29 of the ATA does not permit executive warrants of
arrest or warrantless arrests based on mere suspicion. In accordance with Section 29, a person may be
detained without a warrant by law enforcement or military personnel for actions that are prohibited or
punishable by Sections 4 to 12 of the ATA, but only in the circumstances described in Rule 9.2, similar to
Section 5 of Rule 113 of the Rules of Court, arrest in flagrante delicto, arrest in hot pursuit, and arrest of
fugitives are all possible. Therefore, the government must apply for an arrest warrant with the
appropriate court when the conditions for a warrantless arrest under Section 5 of Rule 113 or Rule 9.2
are not met.
No. The Credible Threat Standard, which the IRR of ATA used, limits the application of Section 5
to communications made under conditions that suggest the threat is credible. Also, the Branderburg
Standard should be used in interpreting and applying Section 5's proviso. Therefore, statements or
communications can only be punished as threats if they are intended to spark off immediate acts of
terrorism, and are likely to do so.
2.
Article 3
States Parties particularly
condemn racial segregation and
apartheid and undertake to
prevent, prohibit and eradicate
all practices of this nature in
territories under their
jurisdiction.
Article 3
The States Parties to the
present Covenant undertake to
ensure the equal right of men
and women to the enjoyment of
all civil and political rights set
forth in the present Covenant.
International Covenant on 16 December 1966 Article 1
Economic, Social, and Cultural 1. All peoples have the
Rights right of self-determination. By
virtue of that right they freely
determine their political status
and freely pursue their economic,
social and cultural development.
Article 3
The States Parties to the
present Covenant undertake to
ensure the equal right of men
and women to the enjoyment of
all economic, social and cultural
rights set forth in the present
Covenant.
Convention on Elimination on All 18 December 1979 Article 2
Forms of Discrimination Against States Parties condemn
Women discrimination against women in
all its forms, agree to pursue by
all appropriate means and
without delay a policy of
eliminating discrimination against
women and, to this end,
undertake:
(a) To embody the
principle of the equality of men
and women in their national
constitutions or other
appropriate legislation if not yet
incorporated therein and to
ensure, through law and other
appropriate means, the practical
realization of this principle;
Article 3
States Parties shall take
in all fields, in particular in the
political, social, economic and
cultural fields, all appropriate
measures, including legislation, to
ensure the full development and
advancement of women, for the
purpose of guaranteeing them
the exercise and enjoyment of
human rights and fundamental
freedoms on a basis of equality
with men.
Convention Against Torture and 10 December 1984 Article 2
Other Cruel, Inhuman, or 1. Each State Party shall
Degrading Treatment or take effective legislative,
Punishment administrative, judicial or other
measures to prevent acts of
torture in any territory under its
jurisdiction.
2. No exceptional
circumstances whatsoever,
whether a state of war or a threat
of war, internal political
instability or any other public
emergency, may be invoked as a
justification of torture.
3. An order from a
superior officer or a public
authority may not be invoked as
a justification of torture.
Article 4
1. Each State Party shall
ensure that all acts of torture are
offences under its criminal law.
The same shall apply to an
attempt to commit torture and to
an act by any person which
constitutes complicity or
participation in torture.
2. Each State Party shall
make these offences punishable
by appropriate penalties which
take into account their grave
nature.
Convention on the Rights of the 20 November 1989 Article 2
Child 1. States Parties shall
respect and ensure the rights set
forth in the present Convention
to each child within their
jurisdiction without
discrimination of any kind,
irrespective of the child's or his or
her parent's or legal guardian's
race, colour, sex, language,
religion, political or other
opinion, national, ethnic or social
origin, property, disability, birth
or other status.
Article 3
1. In all actions
concerning children, whether
undertaken by public or private
social welfare institutions, courts
of law, administrative authorities
or legislative bodies, the best
interests of the child shall be a
primary consideration.
2. States Parties
undertake to ensure the child
such protection and care as is
necessary for his or her well-
being, taking into account the
rights and duties of his or her
parents, legal guardians, or other
individuals legally responsible for
him or her, and, to this end, shall
take all appropriate legislative
and administrative measures.
Article 64
1. Without prejudice to
article 79 of the present
Convention, the States Parties
concerned shall as appropriate
consult and co-operate with a
view to promoting sound,
equitable and humane conditions
in connection with international
migration of workers and
members of their families.
2. No exceptional
circumstances whatsoever,
whether a state of war or a threat
of war, internal political
instability or any other public
emergency, may be invoked as a
justification for enforced
disappearance.
Article 5
The widespread or
systematic practice of enforced
disappearance constitutes a
crime against humanity as
defined in applicable
international law and shall attract
the consequences provided for
under such applicable
international law.
Convention on the Rights of 13 December 2006 Article 3 - General principles
Persons with Disabilities The principles of the
present Convention shall be:
a. Respect for
inherent dignity,
individual
autonomy
including the
freedom to make
one's own
choices, and
independence of
persons;
b. Non-
discrimination;
c. Full and effective
participation and
inclusion in
society;
d. Respect for
difference and
acceptance of
persons with
disabilities as
part of human
diversity and
humanity;
e. Equality of
opportunity;
f. Accessibility;
g. Equality between
men and women;
h. Respect for the
evolving
capacities of
children with
disabilities and
respect for the
right of children
with disabilities
to preserve their
identities.
2.1. An optional protocol is a piece of legislation attached to an existing treaty that deals with
matters that the parent treaty does not or cannot adequately cover. Only States that are parties to the
parent treaty are typically, but not always, permitted to ratify or join. States are not required to join the
protocol even if they are signatories to the parent treaty, making it "optional" in this sense. Optional
Protocols to human rights treaties are treaties in and of themselves, and nations that have ratified the
main treaty may sign, accession, or ratify the optional protocol.
3. In accordance with international human rights treaties, the term "progressive realization" refers
to a key component of States' responsibilities in relation to economic, social, and cultural rights. At its
core is the responsibility to implement appropriate measures to fully realize one's economic, social, and
cultural rights using all available resources. The mention of "resource availability" reflects an
understanding that achieving the realization of these rights may take time and may be hampered by a
lack of resources. Additionally, it implies that a state's adherence to its duty to take appropriate action is
evaluated in light of the resources, financial and otherwise, at its disposal. Additionally, numerous
national constitutions permit the progressive realization of several social, cultural, and economic rights.
Sometimes, the idea of progressive realization is misunderstood to mean that States are not
required to defend economic, social, and cultural rights until they have adequate resources. Instead, the
treaties place an immediate duty on all parties to take appropriate steps toward the full realization of
their economic, social, and cultural rights. Lack of resources cannot be used as an excuse for taking no
action or continuously delaying measures to implement these rights. Even in times of limited resources,
states must show that they are making every effort to improve the enjoyment of economic, social, and
cultural rights. For instance, regardless of the resources at its disposal, a State should prioritize ensuring
that everyone has access to, at the very least, minimum levels of rights and should focus programs to
protect the underprivileged, marginalized, and poor.