You are on page 1of 59

AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.

201501-0020OC
Page 1 of 59

Soluble RAGE Predicts Impaired Alveolar Fluid Clearance in Acute Respiratory

Distress Syndrome

Matthieu Jabaudon1,2, Raiko Blondonnet1,2, Laurence Roszyk2,3, Damien Bouvier2,3, Jules

Audard1, Gael Clairefond2, Mathilde Fournier4, Geoffroy Marceau2,3, Pierre Déchelotte5,

Bruno Pereira6, Vincent Sapin2,3 and Jean-Michel Constantin1,2

1
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care

and Perioperative Medicine, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France

2
Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, EA 7281, R2D2, Clermont-Ferrand, France

3
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,

Clermont-Ferrand, France

4
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Microbiology, Clermont-Ferrand, France

5
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Pathology, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-

Ferrand, France

6
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation (DRCI),

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Corresponding author and address for reprints:

Matthieu Jabaudon, M.D., M.Sc.

Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care

Unit, Estaing University Hospital

Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, EA 7281, R2D2, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 2 of 59

CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 1 Place Lucie Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France

(Tel) +33 473 750 501 (Fax) +33 473 750 500

(Mail) mjabaudon@chu-clermontferrand.fr

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STUDY

MJ takes responsibility for the content of the manuscript. MJ was involved in the conception,

hypotheses delineation, and design of the study, acquisition and analysis of the data, in writing

the article and in its revision prior to submission.

RB was involved in the design of the study, hypotheses delineation, acquisition and analysis

of the data, in writing the article and in its revision prior to submission.

LR was involved in the design of the study, acquisition and analysis of the data, and in the

revision of this article prior to submission.

DB was involved in the acquisition and analysis of the data, and in the revision of this article

prior to submission.

JA was involved in the design of the study, acquisition and analysis of the data, and in the

revision of this article prior to submission.

GC was involved in the design of the study, acquisition and analysis of the data.

MF was involved in the acquisition and analysis of the data, and in the revision of this article

prior to submission.

GM was involved in the acquisition and analysis of the data, and in the revision of this article

prior to submission.

PD was involved in the design of the study, acquisition and analysis of the data, and in the

revision of this article prior to submission.

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 3 of 59

BP was involved in the hypotheses delineation and design of the study, analysis of the data, in

writing the article and in its revision prior to submission.

VS was involved in the conception, hypotheses delineation, and design of the study, analysis

of the data, in writing the article and in its revision prior to submission.

JMC was involved in the conception, hypotheses delineation, and design of the study, analysis

of the data, in writing the article and in its revision prior to submission.

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Auvergne Regional Council

(“Programme Nouveau Chercheur de la Région Auvergne” 2013), the french Agence

Nationale de la Recherche and the Direction Générale de l’Offre de Soins (“Programme de

Recherche Translationnelle en Santé” ANR-13-PRTS-0010) and from Clermont-Ferrand

University Hospital (“Appel d’Offre Interne 2010”, CHU Clermont-Ferrand). The funders had

no influence in the study design, conduct, and analysis or in the preparation of this article.

Short Running Head: sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS.

Subject Code: 4.2 ALI/ARDS: Diagnosis & Clinical Issues

Body of Manuscript Word Count: 3053

AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject

Soluble RAGE is a marker of alveolar type I cell injury and correlates with severity and

outcome in patients with ARDS. Efficient alveolar fluid clearance is a major determinant of

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 4 of 59

lung injury resolution, but reliable biological markers of such a process have been

underinvestigated to date.

What This Study Adds to the Field

Elevated levels of sRAGE in plasma and bronchoalveolar fluid could predict alveolar fluid

clearance and lung injury severity in both a first replication of a translational mouse model of

direct lung epithelial injury and an observational prospective study of patients with ARDS,

thus reinforcing a role for sRAGE as a marker of lung injury and repair.

This article has an online data supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of

content online at www.atsjournals.org

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 5 of 59

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Levels of the soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products

(sRAGE) are elevated during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and correlate with

severity and prognosis. Alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) is necessary for the resolution of lung

edema, but is impaired in the majority of ARDS patients. No reliable marker of this process

has been investigated to date.

Objectives: To verify whether sRAGE could predict AFC during ARDS.

Methods: Anesthetized CD-1 mice underwent orotracheal instillation of hydrochloric acid. At

specified time-points, lung injury was assessed by analysis of blood gases, alveolar

permeability, lung histology, AFC and plasma/bronchoalveolar fluid measurements of pro-

inflammatory cytokines and sRAGE. Plasma sRAGE and AFC rates were also prospectively

assessed in thirty patients with ARDS.

Measurements and Main Results: The rate of AFC was inversely correlated with sRAGE

levels in the plasma and the bronchoalveolar fluid of both acid-injured mice (Spearman’s rho

= -0.73 and -0.69, respectively, P<10-3), and plasma sRAGE correlated with AFC in patients

with ARDS (Spearman’s rho = -0.59, P<10-3). Similarly, sRAGE levels were significantly

associated with lung injury severity, and decreased over time in mice while AFC was restored

and lung injury resolved.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that sRAGE levels could be a reliable predictor of impaired

AFC during ARDS, and should stimulate further studies on the pathophysiologic implications

of RAGE axis in the mechanisms leading to edema resolution.

(Abstract word count: 228)


5

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 6 of 59

Keywords: Acid aspiration, animal model, alveolar epithelium, lung injury resolution,

pulmonary edema.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00811629.

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 7 of 59

INTRODUCTION

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major cause of acute respiratory

failure and death in critically ill patients(1, 2). The reabsorption of pulmonary edema fluid

from the alveolar space is necessary for the resolution of ARDS, and the magnitude of

damage to the alveolar type (AT) I cell is a major determinant of the severity of ARDS(3). In

addition, an intact alveolar epithelial barrier with preserved alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) is

associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS(3). To date, few interventions

have proved beneficial in ARDS(4–6) and pharmacological approaches remain limited, with

deceiving clinical translation(7, 8). Biomarkers reflecting alveolar epithelial functions and

injury may therefore be useful in order to run mechanistic explorations and ultimately

develop innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in ARDS patients(9).

The soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) is a

recently described novel marker of AT I epithelial cell injury with both prognostic and

pathogenic value in patients with ARDS(10–12). A recent study suggests that alveolar

sRAGE levels and alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) rates could be reliable markers of lung

injury onset and resolution in a recent translational mouse model of direct epithelial lung

injury(13). In addition, in an ex vivo model of isolated perfused human lungs declined for

transplantation, the rate of AFC was inversely correlated with the level of sRAGE in alveolar

fluid, but not with perfusate sRAGE levels(14). Apart from one recent study in mice, in

which alveolar sRAGE correlated with AFC during the acute phase of acid-induced lung

injury(15), sRAGE has not been comprehensively assessed as a marker of AFC in both

animal and clinical studies on ARDS.

We specifically designed an experimental and a clinical study to prospectively

determine if sRAGE levels are associated with AFC rate in the setting of ARDS.
7

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 8 of 59

Partial results of this study have already been presented as an abstract or oral

communication during the conference “Congrès National de la Société Française

d’Anesthésie et Réanimation” (2014) and during the annual congress of the European Society

of Intensive Care Medicine (2014)(16, 17).

METHODS

Additional details are provided in the online supplement.

Animal Studies

Our animal ethics committee approved protocols. CD-1 mice were anesthetized prior

to orotracheal instillation of hydrochloric acid(13). After a recovery period under humidified

oxygen, mice were transferred to stabulation.

Criteria for experimental ARDS were evaluated at baseline in injured and sham

animals, and at specified time-points (1, 2, 4 days) after acid instillation in injured mice(13,

18). Mice were tracheotomized and ventilated for 30 min (tidal volume=8-9 mL.kg-1, positive

end-expiratory pressure=6 cmH2O, respiratory rate=160 breaths.min-1 and FiO2=1), before

blood gas measurements. Intravenous human serum albumin (HSA) was administered 1 h

before sacrifice. The permeability index was calculated as the BAL fluid-to-plasma HSA

ratio(19).

BAL was performed(13) and systemic blood was drawn from cardiac puncture. BAL

and plasma interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-17, keratinocyte-derived

chemokine (KC), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2, sRAGE and total proteins were

measured. BAL cells were counted and differential cytology was performed. After sacrifice,

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 9 of 59

lungs were removed, fixed, embedded, and slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. A

standardized histology score was calculated(18).

In separate animals, AFC was determined using previous in situ models(13, 20, 21). A

bovine serum albumin solution was instilled into the trachea; after 30-min ventilation,

proteins were measured in the instilled fluid to calculate AFC rate: Percent AFC over 30 min

= 100 x [1 - (initial/final total protein)]. In mice, the initial protein concentration was

estimated by the protein concentration of the BSA instillate. Animals were categorized into

groups of maximal (≥ 14%/30min) or submaximal (≥ 3%/30min, < 14%/30min) AFC(3, 22).

Human Study

Our institutional review board approved protocols.

Arterial and alveolar samples for sRAGE and AFC measurements were obtained from

30 patients enrolled within 24 h of ARDS onset(23) in a prospective observational study of

soluble forms and ligands of RAGE in ARDS.

Baseline lung computed tomography (CT)-scan was performed; nonfocal morphology

was noted for diffuse or patchy patterns(24), according to the “CT-scan ARDS study group”

criteria(25). Undiluted pulmonary edema fluid and plasma were collected simultaneously, at

baseline (H0) and 4 hours later (H4). Edema fluid total proteins and baseline sRAGE were

measured(22, 24). The AFC rate (in % per hour) was calculated: Percent AFC = 100 x [1 -

(initial (H0) /final (H4) total protein)](26). Patients were categorized into three groups:

maximal (≥ 14%/h), submaximal (≥ 3%/h, < 14%/h) or impaired AFC (< 3%/h)(3, 22).

Statistical analysis

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 10 of 59

Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages, and quantitative data as

means and standard deviations (SD) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) as appropriate.

Analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni tests for pairwise

comparisons between time-points and sham controls. Spearman coefficient was used to test

the correlations between sRAGE and continuous variables. Receiver-operating characteristic

(ROC) curves were computed to determine which parameter distinguished better nonfocal

from focal ARDS. Areas under the curve were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Analyses were performed using Prism 6 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA). A P<0.05 (two-

sided) was considered significant.

RESULTS

Study patients

Thirty patients with criteria for ARDS were enrolled between February 2011 and

January 2013. Main baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes are summarized in table 1.

Median (± SD) PaO2/FiO2 ratio and tidal volume were 108 (± 41) mmHg and 6.7 (± 0.9)

mL.kg-1 ideal body weight, respectively. Positive end-expiratory and inspiratory plateau

pressures were 13.5 (± 3.3) and 27.9 (± 3.4) cmH2O, respectively. First plasma samples for

the study were drawn a mean of 33 (± 39) h after intubation. CT-scan lung morphology was

recorded at baseline in all patients, and ARDS was characterized with nonfocal morphology

in 23 (77%) and focal loss of aeration in 7 (23%).

Animal model of lung injury

10

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 11 of 59

Alveolar-capillary barrier permeability, as assessed by BAL total protein

concentration and the permeability index, showed a substantial increase at day 1 and day 2,

with return to normal levels by day 4 (Figure 1A and C) in injured animals, as compared with

injured mice on day 0 and with sham animals at the same timepoints. No difference was

observed between sham animals at all timepoint; therefore the results from sham and from

day 0 injured mice were mixed for analyses. Arterial oxygenation deteriorated by day 1 after

injury with gradual improvement by day 4 (Figure 1B). Mean arterial oxygen tension

(PaO2/FiO2 ratios) achieved clinical ARDS criteria on day 1 and day 2. Following acid

instillation the number of total leukocytes in BAL fluid increased significantly (Figure 1D),

and mononuclear cells remained predominant over time (around 90-92% of total leukocytes

at all time-points). Significant changes in both BAL (Figure 2) and plasma (Figure 3) levels

of mouse neutrophil chemokines MIP-2 and KC and pro-inflammatory mediators TNF-α, IL-

6 and IL-17 peaked on the first two days after injury.

Lung injury scores were significantly increased on days 1 and 2 (Figure 4A), and acid

aspiration caused substantial changes in lung architecture compared with sham mice and day

0 injured animals (Figure 4B-C). Over the first 48 h there were disrupted alveoli and the

presence of fluid and hemorrhage within the alveolar space (Figure 4D-E). The alveolar walls

were thickened with the presence of a neutrophilic and mononuclear infiltrate. On day 4 lung

neutrophil infiltration, alveolar structure and debris were less intense, but there remained a

cellular infiltrate (Figure 4F).

AFC rate (Figure 5A) showed a significant deterioration during the first 2 days after

injury. The lungs regained the ability to clear fluid on day 4. In parallel, BAL (Figure 5B) and

plasma (Figure 5C) levels of sRAGE were significantly upregulated at day 1-2, and decreased

near baseline by day 4.

11

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 12 of 59

Elevated levels of sRAGE correlate with impaired AFC

When analyzed as a continuous variable, both plasma (Figure 5D) and BAL (Figure

5E) sRAGE baseline levels were inversely correlated with AFC in acid-injured animals

(Spearman’s rho = -0.73 (95% CI, -0.88 to -0.45) and -0.69 (95% CI, -0.86 to -0.38),

respectively, P<10-3 for both). After correction by murine albumin measurement, AFC

remained correlated with plasma and BAL sRAGE levels (Spearman’s rho = -0.73 (95% CI, -

0.88 to -0.4; P<10-4) and -0.54 (95% CI, -0.78 to -0.15; P=0.008), respectively). In lung-

injured mice, AFC was also moderately, but significantly, correlated, with histological lung

injury score, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, permeability index and plasma IL-6, but not with other markers

(Table E1, online supplement).

In patients with ARDS, baseline plasma sRAGE levels also correlated with net AFC

rates (Spearman’s rho = -0.6 (95% CI, -0.79 to -0.29), P=0.0004 <10-3)(Figure 6A). A total of

13 patients (43%) had impaired AFC, 15 patients (50%) had submaximal AFC and 2 patients

(7%) had maximal AFC (Figure 6B). Baseline plasma sRAGE levels increased significantly

with decreasing AFC rates (P=0.005). Alveolar sRAGE and lung injury score (Murray’s

score) also correlated with AFC rates in ARDS patients (Spearman’s rhos = -0.8 (95% CI, -

0.91 to -0.63), P<0.0001, and -0.5 (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.19), P=0.03, respectively).

Correlations between AFC and other clinical or biological markers of lung injury did not

reach significance (Table E1, online supplement).

Levels of sRAGE are associated with lung injury severity

In acid-injured animals, plasma and BAL sRAGE levels were significantly correlated

with PaO2/FiO2 ratio, histological lung injury score and permeability index (Figure E1, online

supplement).

12

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 13 of 59

The ability of baseline plasma sRAGE levels from patients with ARDS to inform on

CT scan-lung morphology was determined. The area under the ROC curve when plasma

sRAGE was used to differentiate the presence from absence of nonfocal loss of aeration was

0.75 (95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P=0.04) for a cut-off value of 3029 pg.mL-1, with a sensitivity of

88% (95% CI, 67-97) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI, 29-96)(Figure E2A, online

supplement). Median plasma sRAGE levels were significantly higher in patients with

nonfocal (6234 pg.mL-1 [3607 to 7420]) than in those with focal lung damage (2550 pg.mL-1

[2323 to 6368])(P=0.02)(Figure E2B, online supplement). The correlation between plasma

sRAGE and lung injury severity, as assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Murray lung injury

score, was also significant in patients with ARDS (Figure E3, online supplement).

Baseline plasma sRAGE levels were higher in patients with severe ARDS (6399

pg.mL-1 [4654 to 8656]; n=17) than in those with moderate ARDS (2846 pg.mL-1 [2498 to

4156]; n=13, P=0.0001), but baseline BAL sRAGE levels were not statistically different

(53829 pg.mL-1 [13873 to 275929] in patients with severe ARDS versus 17478 pg.mL-1

[4134 to 325516] in those with moderate ARDS, P=0.4)(Figure E4, online supplement). In

addition, net AFC rates were lower in patients with severe ARDS (0.8 %/h [0 to 5.5]) than in

those with moderate ARDS (5 %/h [2.4 to 11.3]), but this difference did not reach

significance (P=0.06). Day-28 survivors (N=18) had lower baseline plasma and alveolar

sRAGE levels but higher AFC rates than non-survivors (N=12)(Figure E5, online

supplement).

DISCUSSION

13

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 14 of 59

Our main goal was to determine whether levels of sRAGE, the soluble form of the

receptor for advanced glycation end-products, would serve as a marker of alveolar fluid

clearance in the setting of ARDS. In both a clinical study of ARDS patients and an

experimental model of acid-induced lung injury in mice, alveolar and plasma levels of

sRAGE significantly correlated with AFC rate. sRAGE was also a marker of lung injury

severity over time in mice, as alveolar-capillary barrier permeability, arterial oxygenation

impairment, lung injury scores and the extent of human lung damage on CT-scan were all

associated with sRAGE levels.

In our study, plasma levels of sRAGE were associated in both ARDS patients and

lung-injured animals with impaired AFC. In a prior study by Briot and colleagues in isolated

perfused human lungs, airspace sRAGE levels were inversely correlated with the rate of

AFC, supporting the theory that sRAGE is a relevant marker of alveolar epithelial injury(14).

In a recently published mouse model of acid-induced lung injury reproducing several features

of the pathophysiology of ARDS, alveolar levels of sRAGE were elevated on days 1 and 2

and seemed to correlate with a decrease in alveolar fluid clearance on the same days(13),

although this correlation was not demonstrated for alveolar sRAGE only during the acute

phase of acid-lung injury in mice(15). Measurement of AFC has not been routinely

performed in small-animal ARDS studies, but it adds insights into the function of the alveolar

epithelium. Moreover, a decrease in AFC is characteristic of human ARDS(3, 22). We aimed

at replicating the translational model of direct epithelial lung injury published by Patel and

colleagues, a model of both the onset of lung injury and its resolution. The acid aspiration

model has been described as potentially the most translatable model of direct ARDS, because

there is a clear clinical correlate(27). To date, it has been poorly used because of a narrow

dosing window between no injury and overwhelming injury leading to high mortality(28). In

our study, we reproduced this mouse model of ARDS that replicates several features of
14

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 15 of 59

ARDS, and plasma measurements of pro-inflammatory mediators and sRAGE were included.

There was a marked increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines at days 1 and 2 in HCl-treated

mice, as previously reported(13), and alveolar IL-17 (expressed by a distinct type of T cells,

T helper 17 cells and certain other lymphocytes) was still significantly increased on day 4.

This novel finding could suggest an under investigated role for the IL-17-T helper 17 cell

pathway during ARDS resolution and stimulate further research(29, 30). The report of

sRAGE plasma levels in lung injured mice is rather novel(31) and further supports the value

of sRAGE as a surrogate marker of lung injury severity in general(10–12), and of AFC in

particular, in both the experimental and clinical settings of ARDS. Because of the evidence

that alveolar epithelial type I cells transport sodium and contribute to AFC(32, 33), a marker

of AT I cell injury could reflect intact AFC. Our results, combined with those from others,

support sRAGE as a marker of epithelial injury and barrier dysfunction clinically; they also

provide prospective validation of previously published research in experimental ARDS and in

patients following lung transplantation(10, 34). These data also support the hypothesis that a

marker of alveolar epithelial injury could have predictive value in the assessment of lung

dysfunction and recovery during ARDS(8, 13). Our study was not designed to provide

insights on the precise molecular mechanisms through which RAGE axis activation could

modulate transepithelial fluid clearance, and on the effects of RAGE modulation on AFC.

Although RAGE has the striking capacity to induce cellular attachment and spreading(35, 36)

and to enhance the adherence of epithelial cells to the collagen coated surfaces(37), the role

of RAGE in the alveolar epithelial cell proliferation/differentiation and the regulation of the

expression or function of epithelial membrane channels (e.g., Na+-K+-ATPase, sodium

channels, aquaporins) remains underinvestigated(38). More importantly, whether the

modulation of RAGE axis could lead to enhanced AFC has not been explored to date.

15

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 16 of 59

Our findings, along with those from others, reinforce the role of sRAGE as a

biomarker of epithelial function during ARDS. Its diagnostic and prognostic values have

been reported, and its correlation with severity is established in ARDS(10–12). The

availability of the measurement of plasma biomarker sRAGE could be of particular interest to

assess response to therapy during ARDS, in preclinical studies(39) and ultimately in

patients(40). The impact of mechanical ventilation (MV) settings on sRAGE levels has been

reported in ARDS patients, with prognostic values in those receiving higher tidal

volumes(11), and the effects of various strategies, including alveolar recruitment strategy and

lung imaging-based MV settings are under investigation by our team. Our results support

plasma sRAGE as a marker of AFC during ARDS, and could be useful to better tailor

respiratory interventions to the individual ARDS patient. Nevertheless, whether patients with

the most impaired AFC and with diffuse ARDS might better respond to alveolar recruitment

than others is uncertain(24, 41). In this perspective, the availability of biomarkers should at

least stimulate further research on assessing biomarker-guided respiratory settings(24, 41).

Our study has some potential limitations. First, we have not withdrawn a reference

alveolar fluid sample immediately after bovine albumin instillation for AFC measurement in

mice, as previously reported in order to be as representative of alveolar content as

possible(13). On the other hand, we chose to use another published procedure in which the

instilled albumin concentration serves as reference(20, 42), but we measured mouse albumin

in the final alveolar sample to demonstrate that an increase in total protein concentration

(which is what should happen if AFC is occurring) is not due to leakage of mouse plasma

proteins into the bronchoalveolar space. Second, although we could replicate most

recommended features of ARDS in our experimental model, we did not found an increase in

the absolute number of neutrophils in BAL fluid from HCl-treated mice(13, 18). In our study,

lung injured mice had increased total alveolar leukocytes, higher lung injury scores and
16

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 17 of 59

higher concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines in BAL, suggesting that we were able to

observe an inflammatory response, in both the lung and the systemic circulation(18).

Moreover, we believe that the lack of alveolar neutrophilia should not call under question our

main findings, as it is frequent not to be able to observe every single feature of lung injury in

experimental models of ARDS(18). On the other hand, our findings could be consistent with

a growing body of evidence supporting a role for monocytes in ARDS(43). As they may also

reflect frequent differences between the findings from mice and human studies(44), we chose

a priori to also validate in the clinical setting our findings in mice on the association between

sRAGE levels and AFC. Also, we limited our evaluation in animals at day 4 after injury and

did not assess later time-points(13). The exploration of this later resolution period in such a

model is promising in order to investigate the pathological processes focusing on resolution

and repair(45). Finally, as with any biomarker study, a derivation cohort always demonstrates

better biomarker test characteristics than a validation cohort. Validating our results in an

independent cohort of patients remains therefore necessary.

In conclusion, in both a translational mouse model of direct lung epithelial injury and

a prospective observational study of patients with ARDS, both plasma and alveolar sRAGE

levels were associated with AFC and lung injury severity. Our findings should prompt further

studies on the pathophysiologic implications of RAGE axis in the mechanisms leading to

alveolar epithelial fluid clearance.

17

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 18 of 59

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank the nurses of the intensive care unit at Estaing University

hospital, and the technicians and staff from the department of Medical Biochemistry and

Molecular Biology, Estaing University Hospital, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, and from the

Université d’Auvergne in Clermont-Ferrand, France.

18

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 19 of 59

REFERENCES

1. Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson

LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1685–1693.

2. Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G, Brazzi L, Pimentel J, Lewandowski K, Bion J,

Romand J-A, Villar J, Thorsteinsson A, Damas P, Armaganidis A, Lemaire F, ALIVE

Study Group. Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive

care units. Results from the ALIVE study. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:51–61.

3. Ware LB, Matthay MA. Alveolar fluid clearance is impaired in the majority of patients

with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit

Care Med 2001;163:1376–1383.

4. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for

acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory

Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301–1308.

5. Papazian L, Forel J-M, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S,

Arnal J-M, Perez D, Seghboyan J-M, Constantin J-M, Courant P, Lefrant J-Y, Guérin C,

Prat G, Morange S, Roch A, ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers

in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1107–1116.

6. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard J-C, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet

M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot

M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V,

Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L, PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute

respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2159–2168.

7. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

(ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Matthay MA, Brower RG, Carson S, Douglas IS,

19

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 20 of 59

Eisner M, Hite D, Holets S, Kallet RH, Liu KD, MacIntyre N, Moss M, Schoenfeld D,

Steingrub J, Thompson BT. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of an

aerosolized β-agonist for treatment of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med

2011;184:561–568.

8. Matthay MA. Resolution of pulmonary edema. Thirty years of progress. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med 2014;189:1301–1308.

9. Matthay MA, Zimmerman GA, Esmon C, Bhattacharya J, Coller B, Doerschuk CM,

Floros J, Gimbrone MA Jr, Hoffman E, Hubmayr RD, Leppert M, Matalon S, Munford

R, Parsons P, Slutsky AS, Tracey KJ, Ward P, Gail DB, Harabin AL. Future research

directions in acute lung injury: summary of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

working group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1027–1035.

10. Uchida T, Shirasawa M, Ware LB, Kojima K, Hata Y, Makita K, Mednick G, Matthay

ZA, Matthay MA. Receptor for advanced glycation end-products is a marker of type I

cell injury in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:1008–1015.

11. Calfee CS, Ware LB, Eisner MD, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Wickersham N, Matthay

MA, NHLBI ARDS Network. Plasma receptor for advanced glycation end products and

clinical outcomes in acute lung injury. Thorax 2008;63:1083–1089.

12. Jabaudon M, Futier E, Roszyk L, Chalus E, Guerin R, Petit A, Mrozek S, Perbet S,

Cayot-Constantin S, Chartier C, Sapin V, Bazin J-E, Constantin J-M. Soluble form of

the receptor for advanced glycation end products is a marker of acute lung injury but not

of severe sepsis in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2011;39:480–488.

13. Patel BV, Wilson MR, Takata M. Resolution of acute lung injury and inflammation: a

translational mouse model. Eur Respir J 2012;39:1162–1170.

14. Briot R, Frank JA, Uchida T, Lee JW, Calfee CS, Matthay MA. Elevated levels of the

receptor for advanced glycation end products, a marker of alveolar epithelial type I cell
20

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 21 of 59

injury, predict impaired alveolar fluid clearance in isolated perfused human lungs. Chest

2009;135:269–275.

15. Patel BV, Wilson MR, O’Dea KP, Takata M. TNF-induced death signaling triggers

alveolar epithelial dysfunction in acute lung injury. J Immunol 2013;190:4274–4282.

16. Blondonnet R, Jabaudon M, Clairefond G, Audard J, Sapin V, Constantin J-M.

Corrélation entre clairance liquidienne alvéolaire et sRAGE plasmatique dans un modèle

murin de syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë (SDRA) par instillation d’acide

chlorhydrique [abstract]. Annales Françaises d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation 2014;33,

Supplement 2:A137.

17. Blondonnet R, Jabaudon M, Clairefond G, Audard J, Bouvier D, Marceau G, Blanc P,

Dechelotte P, Sapin V, Constantin J-M. 0853. Elevated levels of soluble rage predict

impaired alveolar fluid clearance in a translational mouse model of acute respiratory

distress syndrome (ARDS) [abstract]. Intensive Care Med Exp 2014;2:P62.

18. Matute-Bello G, Downey G, Moore BB, Groshong SD, Matthay MA, Slutsky AS,

Kuebler WM, Acute Lung Injury in Animals Study Group. An official American

Thoracic Society workshop report: features and measurements of experimental acute

lung injury in animals. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011;44:725–738.

19. Ogawa EN, Ishizaka A, Tasaka S, Koh H, Ueno H, Amaya F, Ebina M, Yamada S,

Funakoshi Y, Soejima J, Moriyama K, Kotani T, Hashimoto S, Morisaki H, Abraham E,

Takeda J. Contribution of high-mobility group box-1 to the development of ventilator-

induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:400–407.

20. Aeffner F, Traylor ZP, Yu ENZ, Davis IC. Double-stranded RNA induces similar

pulmonary dysfunction to respiratory syncytial virus in BALB/c mice. Am J Physiol

Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2011;301:L99–L109.

21. Wolk KE, Lazarowski ER, Traylor ZP, Yu ENZ, Jewell NA, Durbin RK, Durbin JE,
21

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 22 of 59

Davis IC. Influenza A virus inhibits alveolar fluid clearance in BALB/c mice. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:969–976.

22. Matthay MA, Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the

resolution of alveolar edema in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142:1250–1257.

23. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson

ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome:

the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012;307:2526–2533.

24. Constantin J-M, Cayot-Constantin S, Roszyk L, Futier E, Sapin V, Dastugue B, Bazin J-

E, Rouby J-J. Response to recruitment maneuver influences net alveolar fluid clearance

in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 2007;106:944–951.

25. Puybasset L, Cluzel P, Gusman P, Grenier P, Preteux F, Rouby JJ. Regional distribution

of gas and tissue in acute respiratory distress syndrome. I. Consequences for lung

morphology. CT Scan ARDS Study Group. Intensive Care Med 2000;26:857–869.

26. Berthiaume Y, Staub NC, Matthay MA. Beta-adrenergic agonists increase lung liquid

clearance in anesthetized sheep. J Clin Invest 1987;79:335–343.

27. Zhang F, Nielsen LD, Lucas JJ, Mason RJ. Transforming Growth Factor–β Antagonizes

Alveolar Type II Cell Proliferation Induced by Keratinocyte Growth Factor. Am J Respir

Cell Mol Biol 2004;31:679–686.

28. Matute-Bello G, Frevert CW, Martin TR. Animal models of acute lung injury. Am J

Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2008;295:L379–99.

29. Miossec P, Kolls JK. Targeting IL-17 and TH17 cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev

Drug Discov 2012;11:763–776.

30. D’Alessio FR, Tsushima K, Aggarwal NR, West EE, Willett MH, Britos MF, Pipeling

MR, Brower RG, Tuder RM, McDyer JF, King LS. CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs resolve

experimental lung injury in mice and are present in humans with acute lung injury. J
22

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 23 of 59

Clin Invest 2009;119:2898–2913.

31. Voelker M, Fichtner F, Kasper M, Kamprad M, Sack U, Kaisers U, Laudi S.

Characterization of a double-hit murine model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2014;doi:10.1111/1440-1681.12283.

32. Ware LB, Eisner MD, Thompson BT, Parsons PE, Matthay MA. Significance of von

Willebrand factor in septic and nonseptic patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med 2004;170:766–772.

33. Christie JD, Robinson N, Ware LB, Plotnick M, De Andrade J, Lama V, Milstone A,

Orens J, Weinacker A, Demissie E, Bellamy S, Kawut SM. Association of protein C and

type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor with primary graft dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit

Care Med 2007;175:69–74.

34. Christie JD, Shah CV, Kawut SM, Mangalmurti N, Lederer DJ, Sonett JR, Ahya VN,

Palmer SM, Wille K, Lama V, Shah PD, Shah A, Weinacker A, Deutschman CS, Kohl

BA, Demissie E, Bellamy S, Ware LB, Lung Transplant Outcomes Group. Plasma levels

of receptor for advanced glycation end products, blood transfusion, and risk of primary

graft dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:1010–1015.

35. Li J, Qu X, Schmidt AM. Sp1-binding elements in the promoter of RAGE are essential

for amphoterin-mediated gene expression in cultured neuroblastoma cells. J Biol Chem

1998;273:30870–30878.

36. Hori O, Brett J, Slattery T, Cao R, Zhang J, Chen JX, Nagashima M, Lundh ER, Vijay

S, Nitecki D. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular

binding site for amphoterin. Mediation of neurite outgrowth and co-expression of rage

and amphoterin in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem 1995;270:25752–25761.

37. Fehrenbach H, Weiskirchen R, Kasper M, Gressner AM. Up-regulated expression of the

receptor for advanced glycation end products in cultured rat hepatic stellate cells during
23

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 24 of 59

transdifferentiation to myofibroblasts. Hepatology 2001;34:943–952.

38. Downs CA, Kreiner LH, Johnson NM, Brown LA, Helms MN. Receptor for Advanced

Glycation End-Products Regulates Lung Fluid Balance via Protein Kinase C-gp91(phox)

Signaling to Epithelial Sodium Channels. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2015;52:75–87.

39. Su X, Looney MR, Gupta N, Matthay MA. Receptor for advanced glycation end-

products (RAGE) is an indicator of direct lung injury in models of experimental lung

injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009;297:L1–5.

40. Walter JM, Wilson J, Ware LB. Biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: from

pathobiology to improving patient care. Expert Rev Respir Med 2014;8:573–586.

41. Constantin J-M, Grasso S, Chanques G, Aufort S, Futier E, Sebbane M, Jung B, Gallix

B, Bazin JE, Rouby J-J, Jaber S. Lung morphology predicts response to recruitment

maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med

2010;38:1108–1117.

42. Yu ENZ, Traylor ZP, Davis IC. Effect of ventilation pressure on alveolar fluid clearance

and beta-agonist responses in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol

2009;297:L785–93.

43. Watkins TR. The Monocyte and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Implicated,

Innocent Bystander, or Awash in Research Translation? Am J Respir Crit Care Med

2013;188:407–408.

44. Drake AC. Of mice and men: what rodent models don’t tell us. Cell Mol Immunol

2013;10:284–285.

45. Matthay MA, Howard JP. Progress in modelling acute lung injury in a pre-clinical

mouse model. Eur Respir J 2012;39:1062–1063.

24

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 25 of 59

FIGURE LEGENDS

FIGURE 1. A) Changes in alveolar–capillary barrier permeability as measured by

bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid total protein level (n=4-6 for each time-point). B)

Arterial oxygen tension (PaO2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2)(n=4-6 for each time-

point). C) Permeability index calculated as the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid-to-plasma

ratio of human serum albumin (HSA) concentration (n=4-6 for each time-point). D)

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) total numbers of leucocytes (n=4-6 for each time-point).

Values are reported as means ± standard deviations. ** P<10-2; *** P<10-3; **** P<10-4

versus sham controls.

FIGURE 2. Measurement of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) levels of A) interleukin (IL)-6,

B) tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C) interleukin (IL)-17, D) macrophage inflammatory

protein (MIP)-2 and E) keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) at baseline (day 0) and after

acid aspiration (n=4-6 for each time-point). Values are reported as means ± standard

deviations. * P<0.05; ** P<10-2; *** P<10-3; **** P<10-4 versus sham controls.

FIGURE 3. Measurement of plasma levels of A) interleukin (IL)-6, B) tumor necrosis factor

(TNF)-α, C) interleukin (IL)-17, D) macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 and E)

keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) at baseline (day 0) and after acid aspiration (n=4-6 for

each time-point). Values are reported as means ± standard deviations. * P<0.05; ** P<10-2;

*** P<10-3; **** P<10-4 versus sham controls.

FIGURE 4. A) Lung injury scoring shows a significant injury on days 1, 2 and 4 in injured

animals as compared to sham controls (n=6-8 for each time-point). Lung injury was assessed
25

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 26 of 59

on a scale of 0–2 for each of the following criteria: i) neutrophils in the alveolar space, ii)

neutrophils in the interstitial space, iii) number of hyaline membranes, iv) amount of

proteinous debris, and v) extent of alveolar septal thickening.

The final injury score was derived from the following calculation:

Score=[20x(i)+14x(ii)+7x(iii)+7x(iv)+2x(v)]/(number of fieldsx100). Values are reported as

means ± standard deviations. * P<0.05; **** P<10-4 versus sham controls. B-F)

Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections at x20 original magnification

of sham and injured animals at all time-points after acid aspiration. B) Sham, C) Day 0,

injured, D) Day 1, injured, E) Day 2, injured, F) Day 4, injured. There is greater cellularity

consisting mainly of neutrophils (white arrows) on days 1 and 2 with more areas of

atelectasis as well as increased alveolar disruption with hyaline membranes (arrowheads),

proteinous debris and hemorrhage. Scale bars 50 µm.

FIGURE 5. A) Measurement of alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) rate as a marker of epithelial

function (n=4-6 for each time-point). Measurement of B) plasma and C) bronchoalveolar

lavage (BAL) levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) as a

marker of type 1 alveolar epithelial injury (n=4-6 for each time-point). Values are reported as

means ± standard deviations. ** P<10-2; *** P<10-3; **** P<10-4 versus sham controls. D)

Plasma and E) BAL sRAGE baseline levels plotted against AFC rate show that sRAGE

inversely correlated with the AFC rate in acid-injured animals (Spearman’s rho = -0.73 (95%

CI, -0.88 to -0.45) and -0.69 (95% CI, -0.86 to -0.38), respectively, P<10-3). Each data-point

represents a separate animal. F) Plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products

(sRAGE) levels in lung-injured mice with categories of alveolar fluid clearance: submaximal

(≥ 3%/30min, < 14%/30min), or maximal (≥ 14%/30min). N = number of animals. Values are

reported as means ± standard deviations and are analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test
26

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 27 of 59

(nonparametric data). G) BAL soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products

(sRAGE) levels in lung-injured mice with categories of alveolar fluid clearance: submaximal

(≥ 3%/30min, < 14%/30min), or maximal (≥ 14%/30min). N = number of animals. Values are

reported as means ± standard deviations and are analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test

(nonparametric data).

FIGURE 6. A) Plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE)

baseline levels plotted against alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) rate show that sRAGE inversely

correlated with the AFC rate in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

(ARDS)(Spearman’s rho = -0.59 (95% CI, -0.79 to -0.28), P<10-3). Each data-point

represents a separate patient. B) Plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products

(sRAGE) baseline levels in patients with ARDS with three categories of alveolar fluid

clearance: impaired (< 3%/h), submaximal (≥ 3%/h, < 14%/h), or maximal (≥ 14%/h). N =

number of subjects. Values are reported as means ± standard deviations and are analyzed

with Kruskal-Wallis test (nonparametric data).

27

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 28 of 59

TABLE

Male sex, n (%) 16 (53)

Age (years) 61 ± 15

Body mass index (kg.m-2) 25.9 ± 6.9

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score 10.9 ± 3.3

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 25.5 ± 7.3

Coexisting conditions, n (%)

- Atherosclerosis 7 (23)

- Diabetes 7 (23)

- Hypertension 12 (40)

- Dyslipidemia 6 (20)

- Current smoking 6 (20)

- COPD 4 (13)

- Asthma 1 (3)

- Hematologic neoplasms 8 (27)

- Chronic renal failure 1 (3)

Cause of ARDS, n (%)

- Sepsis 27 (90)

- Pneumonia 21 (70)

- Aspiration 1 (3)

- Severe trauma 1 (3)

28

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 29 of 59

Lung injury score 3.3 ± 0.5

Baseline arterial level of sRAGE (pg.mL-1) 5502 ± 2994

Baseline alveolar level of sRAGE (pg.mL-1) 154734 ± 217417

Baseline AFC (% per hour) 2.1 ± 8.9

Maximal AFC (≥ 14%/h), n (%) 2 (7)

Submaximal AFC (≥ 3%/h, < 14%/h), n (%) 15 (50)

Impaired AFC (< 3%/h), n (%) 13 (43)

Ventilator-free days 7±9

Survival on day 28, n (%) 18 (60)

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of patients with acute respiratory distress

syndrome (ARDS)(N=30). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, unless

otherwise indicated. The body-mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of

the height in meters. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. sRAGE: soluble form of

the receptor for advanced glycation end-products. AFC: alveolar fluid clearance. ARDS:

acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung injury (or Murray) score can range from 0 to 4,

with higher values indicating more severe lung injury. Percentages may not exactly total

100% because of rounding.

29

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 30 of 59

192x137mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 31 of 59

183x195mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 32 of 59

228x271mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 33 of 59

160x95mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 34 of 59

270x389mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 35 of 59

232x330mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 36 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
Online Data Supplement

Soluble RAGE Predicts Impaired Alveolar Fluid Clearance in Acute Respiratory

Distress Syndrome

Matthieu Jabaudon, Raiko Blondonnet, Laurence Roszyk, Damien Bouvier, Jules Audard,

Gael Clairefond, Mathilde Fournier, Geoffroy Marceau, Pierre Déchelotte, Bruno Pereira,

Vincent Sapin and Jean-Michel Constantin

METHODS

Animal Studies

Our institutional animal care and ethics committee approved study protocols (Comité

d’Ethique en Matière d’Expérimentation Animale d’Auvergne, approval number CE 67-12).

Male CD-1 mice (Janvier Labs, Saint-Berthevin, France), aged 10-12 weeks and

weighing 25-30 g, were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (10 mg.kg-1) and

ketamine (100 mg.kg-1), and given an intraperitoneal fluid bolus of 10 µL.g-1 0.9% isotonic

saline as pre-emptive fluid resuscitation. Mice were suspended vertically from their incisors

on a custom-made mount for orotracheal instillation, as described previously(E1). A fine

catheter was guided 1 cm below the vocal cords, and 75 µL of an iso-osmolar (to mouse

plasma, i.e. 322 mOsm.L-1) solution of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (pH 1.0) was instilled. For

the next 4 h, during which time animals exhibited significant respiratory depression/distress,

mice were kept in a transparent recovery box under humidified supplemental oxygen

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 37 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
(inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) reduced gradually from 1.0 to 0.21). During this period,

animals were carefully monitored and body temperature was maintained using external heat

sources, after which they were transferred to individually ventilated cages with air and free

access to food and water.

Criteria for experimental ARDS were evaluated as recommended by the American

Thoracic Society(E2) at baseline in injured and sham animals, and at specified time-points (1,

2 and 4 days) after acid instillation in injured mice(E1). In brief, mice were anesthetized,

tracheotomized and ventilated using an appropriate ventilator (TOPOTM Small Animal

Ventilator, Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT). After an initial lung recruitment maneuver (30

cmH2O for 5 s), animals were ventilated for 30 min (tidal volume 8-9 mL.kg-1, positive end-

expiratory pressure 6 cmH2O, respiratory rate 160 breaths.min-1 and FiO2 1) to standardize

the volume history of the lungs. At the end of ventilation, blood gases were measured and

mice were sacrificed by anesthetic overdose with intraperitoneal pentobarbital (150 mg.kg-1).

Acid-injured animals were compared with otherwise sham mice, receiving just saline tracheal

instillation, surgical preparation and 30-min ventilation. All mice received 10 mg.kg-1 of

human serum albumin (HSA) dissolved in 100 µL of saline intravenously, 1 h before

euthanasia, for measurement of the lung permeability index, presented as percentage. This

permeability index was defined as the ratio of HSA in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid to

that in plasma collected at the end of the experiments. The HSA concentration was measured

by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a human albumin ELISA Kit (R&D

Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The lower limit of detection was 5 ng.mL-1.

BAL was performed with 750 µL of saline as described previously(E1) and systemic

blood was drawn from cardiac puncture; the samples were centrifuged at 240xg. Protein

levels in BAL fluid were quantified with a colorimetric method (Pierce Biotechnology,

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 38 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
Rockwood, IL). BAL and plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,

IL-17, keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2

were determined in duplicate using the Bio-Plex 200 System, which is based on Luminex

xMAP Technology (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). In the present study, we screened BAL

and plasma samples using the Mouse Cytokine 4-plex panel and MIP-2 SET (Bio-Rad,

Marnes-la-Coquette, France). BAL and plasma levels of soluble receptor for advanced

glycation end-products (RAGE) were determined with ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,

MN). BAL cell counts were obtained using a hemocytometer, with differential cytology

performed on DiffQuik-stained samples prepared by cytospin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, St.

Leon-Rot, Germany).

In a separate series of experiments, alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) was determined at

baseline and at days 1, 2 and 4 after acid instillation (and in untreated animals), using a

modification of previously described established in situ models(E1, E3, E4). Once the mouse

was stable on the ventilator, it was briefly disconnected to permit instillation of 300 µL of 5%

BSA/saline (322 mOsm/L, iso-osmotic to mouse plasma) into the dependent (left) lung via

the tracheal cannula, which was then flushed with 100 µL of air before reconnection to the

ventilator. Thirty minutes after instillation, a surgical pneumothorax was induced through

blunt dissection of the diaphragm to maximize the recovery of the remaining instillate from

the lungs. After 30-min ventilation, instilled fluid was aspirated to measure protein content

and calculate AFC rate: Percent AFC over 30 min = 100 x [1 - (initial protein/final total

protein)]. In mice, the initial protein concentration was the protein concentration of the BSA

instillate. Measurement of AFC assumes that the concentration of instilled protein is not

altered significantly by the presence of excess alveolar fluid and/or protein.

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 39 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
AFC was also calculated with correction for excess murine alveolar protein, as

previously described(E4). Acid instillation may cause significant damage to the broncho-

alveolar-capillary barrier, which may result in significant leakage of murine serum proteins

into the alveolar space, resulting in overestimation of AFC rates if based solely upon total

protein levels in AFC aspirates. To correct for epithelial leakage, the amount of murine

albumin was measured in duplicate in the fluid aspirated from the lungs at the end of the 30-

min ventilation period using specific ELISA (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Final AFC values

were corrected by a factor of (100-% murine albumin present in the aspirate)/100. All

samples had a coefficient of variation less than 10%. Animals were further categorized into

three groups of AFC: maximal (≥ 14%/30min), submaximal (≥ 3%/30min, < 14%/30min) or

impaired (< 3%/30min).

In a separate series of experiments, acid injured mice (at each time-point) and

untreated animals were sacrificed and their both lungs removed, fixed with alcoholic acetified

formalin and embedded with paraffin. Slices at 10-µm thickness were subsequently stained

with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma-Aldrich Ltd). The histology injury score was derived

from the following calculation: Score = [20x(i) + 14x(ii) + 7x(iii) + 7x(iv) + 2x(v)] / (number

of fields x 100)(table E2)(E2).

Human Study

Samples for plasma sRAGE and AFC measurements were obtained from patients enrolled in

a prospective observational study of soluble forms and ligands of RAGE in ARDS

(clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01270295). Thirty consecutive patients under mechanical

ventilation with acute lung injury/ARDS were identified based on the Berlin definition(E5).

and included within 24 hours of disease onset in the adult general intensive care unit (ICU) at

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 40 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Patients were ineligible if: they were

pregnant; < 18 years old; they had a history of acute exacerbation of diabetes, dialysis for

end-stage kidney disease, Alzheimer’s disease, amyloidosis or evolutive solid neoplasm.

Clinical and biological data were collected prospectively. All patients were

mechanically ventilated at baseline and were cared for by the ICU staff. Clinical data were

recorded and included hemodynamic parameters, respiratory and ventilatory parameters,

multiorgan system function, and medication administered. All patients were followed until

death, 28 days or ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. The Acute Physiology And

Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)

and the lung injury scores were calculated at baseline(E6–E8). Intensive care management of

patients included in the study was conducted using our ICU-based standard protocols. Thus,

mechanical ventilation strategy (including weaning strategy), sepsis management, and the use

of sedative agents were based on currently available guidelines(E9, E10). A lung-protective

ventilation strategy was applied; a tidal volume of 6 mL.kg-1 (ideal) body weight and a

pressure plateau of <30 cm H2O were targeted in all mechanically ventilated patients(E9,

E10).

According to our institutional protocol, a baseline lung computed tomography (CT)-

scan was performed, as previously described(E11). On day 0, two physicians transferred

ARDS patients to the Department of Radiology of our institution, as previously described by

our group(E11). During CT-scan image acquisition, particular attention was paid to avoid any

change in patient positioning. Electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, and systemic arterial

pressure were continuously assessed throughout the CT-scan procedure. The lowest value of

hemoglobin oxygen saturation allowed during the imaging exam was 85%(E12). Lung CT-

scanning was performed in the supine position from the apex to the diaphragm, using a

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 41 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
multislice helical Multidetector CT-scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba, Japan). Without iodine

contrast medium injection, 1-mm thick contiguous CT sections were acquired using a low-

dose protocol. All images were observed and photographed at a window width of 1600

Hounsfield units (HU) and a level of -700 HU. The exposures were taken at 120 Kv and 250

mA. Two independent senior radiologists at our institution, blinded to clinical and biological

data, interpreted CT-scans. Nonfocal lung morphology was noted for diffuse or patchy

patterns, according to the “CT-scan ARDS study group” criteria (E12). One of the

investigators (JMC) adjudicated disagreements (n=2) between radiologists. The strength of

agreement for the characterization of focal versus nonfocal ARDS in our study was very good

between the two observers using the inter-rater agreement Kappa statistic (Κ=0.87, 95% CI

0.74 to 0.99).

Arterial blood samples were collected from patients at baseline. Levels of sRAGE

were measured in thawed samples using a commercially available sandwich enzyme

immunoassay kit (Human sRAGE Quantikine ELISA Kit, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN),

according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All steps were undertaken at room temperature.

Briefly, 96-well Costar EIA plates (Corning Life Sciences, Lowell, MA) were coated with the

capture antibody. Plates were blocked with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1%

bovine serum albumin, and incubated with 100-µL samples of plasma/edema fluid or

standards followed by biotinylated detection antibody. After subsequent incubation with

streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase, colorimetric detection was done using

tetramethylbenzidine as the substrate. Plasma/edema levels of the measured marker were

determined by a computer software regression calculation based on the optical density values

at 450 nm and 540 nm read with a microtiter plate reader (Rainbow, Tecan, Maennedorf,

Switzerland); readings at 540 nm were subtracted from those at 450 nm for correction for

optical imperfections in the plate. All measurements were conducted in duplicate. The intra-

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 42 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
assay coefficient of variation was 5.8%. Personnel responsible for performing assays had no

knowledge of the clinical data.

Undiluted pulmonary edema fluid samples were collected from patients at baseline

and 4 h later, as previously described(E13, E14). Briefly, a soft 14-Fr-gauge suction catheter

(PharmaPlast, Maersk Medical, Denmark) was advanced into a wedged position in a distal

bronchus via an endotracheal tube. Pulmonary edema fluid was collected in a suction trap by

gentle suction. All samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min in a refrigerated

centrifuge. Supernatants were collected, and the total protein concentration in edema fluid

was measured by the biuret method(E13, E14).

On the basis of the observation that the rate of clearance of edema fluid from the

alveolar space is much faster than the rate of protein removal(E15), the net AFC rate was

calculated: Percent AFC = 100 x [1 - (initial edema protein/final edema total protein)]. Initial

and final samples were drawn at baseline and 4 h later, respectively. This method has been

validated in prior clinical and experimental studies(E13, E16–E19). Patients were further

categorized into three groups of AFC: maximal (≥ 14%/h), submaximal (≥ 3%/h, < 14%/h) or

impaired (< 3%/h)(E13, E16–E19). All samples had a coefficient of variation less than 10%.

Levels of sRAGE were also measured by duplicate ELISA in the pulmonary edema fluid

from patients with ARDS (Human sRAGE Quantikine ELISA Kit, R&D Systems,

Minneapolis, MN), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital

of Clermont-Ferrand, France (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Est VI, approval

number AU870). All participants, or their next-of-kin, provided written consent to participate

in this study.

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 43 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
Statistical analysis

Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages, and quantitative data as

mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) according to

statistical distribution. Statistical analyses of physiological parameters were carried out by

Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni tests for pairwise comparisons between each time-point and

sham controls (represented as day 0). Spearman correlation coefficient was used to test the

correlations between sRAGE levels and other continuous variables in injured animals or

patients. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to determine which

parameter distinguished better nonfocal from focal ARDS. Areas under the curve were

calculated and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI)(e.g., for sensitivity and

specificity), and several indexes were proposed to establish the best threshold (Youden, Liu,

efficiency). All analyses were performed using Prism 6 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA).

A P<0.05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant.

A limited number of animals was used for baseline comparisons (n=3-4), and 4-6

animals were used in each group on days 1, 2 and 4 in order to detect a difference of 1

mg.mL-1 (SD=0.5) in BAL protein concentration and of 5 % per 30 min (SD =2.5) in AFC

rate on day 1 or day 2, when considering alpha and beta risks of 5% (bilateral) and 10%,

respectively. Statistical power of 90% was considered sufficient to allow multiple

comparisons between groups. The size of the clinical validating cohort was based on previous

calculations in critically ill patients, with the ability to detect a 1500 pg.mL-1 difference in

baseline sRAGE levels between ARDS (a priori estimation: 3356 ± 1780 pg.mL-1) and

mechanically-ventilated controls (a priori estimation: 525 ± 480 pg.mL-1), when considering

type I error alpha and statistical power of 5% (bilateral) and 80%, respectively.

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 44 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement

RESULTS

Levels of sRAGE are associated with lung injury severity

In acid-injured animals, plasma and BAL sRAGE levels were significantly correlated

with PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Spearman’s rho = -0.74 (95% CI, -0.89 to -0.46) and -0.66 (95% CI, -

0.85 to -0.33), respectively, P<10-3 for both), histological lung injury score (Spearman’s rho

= 0.74 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.85), respectively, P<10-3 for both)

and permeability index (Spearman’s rho = 0.73 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88) and 0.78 (95% CI,

0.53 to 0.90), respectively, P<10-4 for both)(Figure E1, online supplement).

The ability of baseline plasma sRAGE levels from patients with ARDS to

discriminate between the types of loss of aeration based on CT scan-lung morphology was

determined. The area under the ROC curve when plasma sRAGE was used to differentiate

the presence from absence of nonfocal loss of aeration was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P=0.04)

for a cut-off value of 3029 pg.mL-1, with a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 67-97) and a

specificity of 71% (95% CI, 29-96)(Figure E2A, online supplement). Median plasma sRAGE

levels were significantly higher in patients with nonfocal (6234 pg.mL-1 [3607 to 7420]) than

in those with focal lung damage (2550 pg.mL-1 [2323 to 6368])(P=0.02)(Figure E2B, online

supplement). The correlation between plasma sRAGE and lung injury severity was also

significant in patients with ARDS, as assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Spearman’s rho = -0.65,

95% CI, -0.82 to -0.37, P<10-3) and Murray lung injury score (Spearman’s rho = 0.79, 95%

CI, 0.61 to 0.90, P<10-4)(Figure E3, online supplement).

Baseline plasma sRAGE levels were higher in patients with severe ARDS (6399

pg.mL-1 [4654 to 8656]; n=17) than in those with moderate ARDS (2846 pg.mL-1 [2498 to

4156]; n=13, P=0.0001), but baseline BAL sRAGE levels were not statistically different

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 45 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
(53829 pg.mL-1 [13873 to 275929] in patients with severe ARDS versus 17478 pg.mL-1

[4134 to 325516] in those with moderate ARDS, P=0.4)(Figure E4, online supplement). In

addition, net AFC rates were lower in patients with severe ARDS (0.8 %/h [0 to 5.5]) than in

those with moderate ARDS (5 %/h [2.4 to 11.3]), but this difference did not reach

significance (P=0.06).

Baseline plasma and BAL sRAGE levels were moderately correlated with APACHE

2 score (Spearman’s rho = 0.37, 95% CI, -0.66 to 0.002, P=0.04 and -0.37, 95% CI, -0.65 to

0.009, P=0.04, respectively); but not with other severity scores (SAPS 2, SOFA score). There

was no significant correlation between AFC and APACHE 2 (Spearman’s rho = 0.12, 95%

CI, -0.27 to 0.47, P=0.5), SOFA (Spearman’s rho = 0.13, 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.48, P=0.5) or

SAPS 2 (Spearman’s rho = 0.14, 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.49, P=0.5) scores. There was no

correlation between the number of ventilatory-free days at day 28 and baseline plasma

(Spearman’s rho = 0.09, 95% CI, -0.29 to 0.45, P=0.6), alveolar (Spearman’s rho = 0.05, 95%

CI, -0.32 to 0.41, P=0.8) sRAGE or AFC (Spearman’s rho = 0.06, 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.42,

P=0.7). Day-28 survivors (N=18) had lower baseline plasma and alveolar sRAGE levels but

higher AFC rates than non-survivors (N=12)(Figure E5, online supplement).

10

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 46 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
REFERENCES

E1. Patel BV, Wilson MR, Takata M. Resolution of acute lung injury and inflammation: a

translational mouse model. Eur Respir J 2012;39:1162–1170.

E2. Matute-Bello G, Downey G, Moore BB, Groshong SD, Matthay MA, Slutsky AS,

Kuebler WM, Acute Lung Injury in Animals Study Group. An official American

Thoracic Society workshop report: features and measurements of experimental acute

lung injury in animals. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011;44:725–738.

E3. Aeffner F, Traylor ZP, Yu ENZ, Davis IC. Double-stranded RNA induces similar

pulmonary dysfunction to respiratory syncytial virus in BALB/c mice. Am J Physiol

Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2011;301:L99–L109.

E4. Wolk KE, Lazarowski ER, Traylor ZP, Yu ENZ, Jewell NA, Durbin RK, Durbin JE,

Davis IC. Influenza A virus inhibits alveolar fluid clearance in BALB/c mice. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:969–976.

E5. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson

ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome:

the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012;307:2526–2533.

E6. Gall J-RL, Loirat P, Alpcrovitch A. APACHE II-A Severity of Disease Classification

System. Crit Care Med 1986;14:754.

E7. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK,

Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to

describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related

Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med

1996;22:707–710.

E8. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult

11

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 47 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;138:720–723.

E9. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus

DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut J-F, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini

JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender

JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent J-L, International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines

Committee, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest

Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, Canadian Critical Care

Society, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of

severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296–327.

E10. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for

acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory

Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301–1308.

E11. Malbouisson LM, Muller JC, Constantin JM, Lu Q, Puybasset L, Rouby JJ, CT Scan

ARDS Study Group. Computed tomography assessment of positive end-expiratory

pressure-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with acute respiratory distress

syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1444–1450.

E12. Puybasset L, Cluzel P, Gusman P, Grenier P, Preteux F, Rouby JJ. Regional distribution

of gas and tissue in acute respiratory distress syndrome. I. Consequences for lung

morphology. CT Scan ARDS Study Group. Intensive Care Med 2000;26:857–869.

E13. Matthay MA, Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the

resolution of alveolar edema in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142:1250–1257.

E14. Constantin J-M, Cayot-Constantin S, Roszyk L, Futier E, Sapin V, Dastugue B, Bazin J-

E, Rouby J-J. Response to recruitment maneuver influences net alveolar fluid clearance

in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 2007;106:944–951.

E15. Berthiaume Y, Staub NC, Matthay MA. Beta-adrenergic agonists increase lung liquid

12

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 48 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
clearance in anesthetized sheep. J Clin Invest 1987;79:335–343.

E16. Verghese GM, Ware LB, Matthay BA, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport

and the resolution of clinically severe hydrostatic pulmonary edema. J Appl Physiol

1999;87:1301–1312.

E17. Ware LB, Matthay MA. Alveolar fluid clearance is impaired in the majority of patients

with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit

Care Med 2001;163:1376–1383.

E18. Ware LB, Golden JA, Finkbeiner WE, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport

capacity in reperfusion lung injury after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care

Med 1999;159:980–988.

E19. Sakuma T, Okaniwa G, Nakada T, Nishimura T, Fujimura S, Matthay MA. Alveolar

fluid clearance in the resected human lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:305–

310.

13

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 49 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement

FIGURE LEGENDS

Figure E1. A) Plasma and B) Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) soluble receptor for advanced

glycation end-products (sRAGE) baseline levels plotted against arterial oxygen tension

(PaO2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) show that sRAGE inversely correlated with

oxygenation in acid-injured animals (Spearman’s rho = -0.74 (95% CI, -0.89 to -0.46) and -

0.66 (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.33), respectively, P<10-3). C) Plasma and D) BAL soluble receptor

for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) baseline levels plotted against histological

lung injury scoring show that sRAGE positively correlated with lung injury in acid-injured

animals (Spearman’s rho = 0.74 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.85),

respectively, P<10-3). E) Plasma and F) BAL soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-

products (sRAGE) baseline levels plotted against the permeability index (calculated as the

BAL fluid-to-plasma ratio of human serum albumin (HSA) concentration) show that sRAGE

positively correlated with alveolar-capillary barrier permeability (Spearman’s rho = 0.73

(95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.90), respectively, P<10-4). Each data-

point represents a separate animal.

Figure E2. A) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of baseline plasma soluble

receptor for advanced glycation end product levels in differentiating between the presence

and absence of non-focal loss of aeration during computed tomography scan morphology

studies on day 0 in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (N=30). The

area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P=0.04) for a cut-off value of 3029

pg.mL-1, with a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 67-97) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI, 29-96).

B) Baseline plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) levels in

14

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 50 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with focal (n=7) and non-focal loss of

aeration (n=23), as assessed by computed tomography scan lung morphology on day 0.

Values are reported as means ± standard deviations and are analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test

(nonparametric data).

Figure E3. A) Plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE)

baseline levels plotted against arterial oxygen tension (PaO2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction

(FiO2) show that sRAGE inversely correlated with oxygenation in patients with acute

respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)(Spearman’s rho = -0.65 (95% CI, -0.82 to -0.37),

P<10-3). B) Plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) baseline

levels plotted against lung injury score show that sRAGE positively correlated with lung

injury in patients with ARDS (Spearman’s rho = 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.90), P<10-3). Lung

injury (or Murray) score can range from 0 to 4, with higher values indicating more severe

injury. Each data-point represents a separate patient.

Figure E4. A) Plasma and B) BAL soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products

(sRAGE) baseline levels in patients with moderate or severe ARDS (based on Berlin

definition criteria). N = number of subjects. Values are reported as means ± standard

deviations and are analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test (nonparametric data).

Figure E5. Baseline A) plasma, B) BAL soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-

products (sRAGE) baseline levels and C) alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) rates in 30-day

survivors (N=18) and non-survivors (N=12). Values are reported as means ± standard

deviations and are analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test (nonparametric data).

15

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 51 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
Figure E6. BAL proportions of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, mononuclear cells and

lymphocytes within the mouse model (n=4-6 for each time-point). There was no statistical

difference between groups and between time-points in injured mice.

16

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 52 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement
Table E1. Correlations between net alveolar fluid clearance (in % per hour) and
various clinical or biological markers of lung injury in both lung-injured mice and
patients with ARDS. Correlations have been tested with the calculation of Spearman’s rank
correlation coefficient ρ (rho). CI: confidence interval. * P<0.05.
Marker Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
Patients with ARDS
Plasma sRAGE* ρ=-0.6 (95% CI, -0.79 to -0.29), P=0.0004
Alveolar sRAGE* ρ=-0.8 (95% CI, -0.91 to -0.63), P<0.0001
Lung injury score* ρ=-0.5 (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.19), P=0.03
PaO2/FiO2 ratio ρ=0.4 (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.64), P=0.06
Oxygenation index ρ=0.1 (95% CI, -0.25 to 0.48), P=0.49
Alveolar-to-plasma total protein ratio ρ=-0.3 (95% CI, -0.58 to 0.12), P=0.16
Static lung compliance ρ=0.2 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.53), P=0.28
Inspiratory plateau pressure ρ=0.007 (95% CI, -0.36 to 0.38), P=0.97
Mouse model
Plasma sRAGE* ρ=-0.73 (95% CI, -0.88 to -0.45), P<0.001
Alveolar sRAGE* ρ=-0.69 (95% CI, -0.86 to -0.38), P<0.001
Histological lung injury score* ρ=-0.42 (95% CI, -0.71 to 0.009), P=0.04
PaO2/FiO2 ratio* ρ=0.46 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.74), P=0.03
Permeability index* ρ=-0.43 (95% CI, -0.72 to -0.01), P=0.04
Plasma IL-6* ρ=-0.61 (95% CI, -0.82 to -0.26), P=0.002
Plasma TNF-α ρ=-0.11 (95% CI, -0.51 to 0.33), P=0.6
Plasma IL-17 ρ=-0.32 (95% CI, -0.65 to 0.12), P=0.1
Plasma MIP-2 ρ=-0.4 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.03), P=0.06
Plasma KC ρ=-0.39 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.03), P=0.06
Alveolar IL-6 ρ=-0.07 (95% CI, -0.48 to 0.37), P=0.8
Alveolar TNF-α ρ=-0.15 (95% CI, -0.54 to 0.29), P=0.5
Alveolar IL-17 ρ=0.21 (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.62), P=0.4
Alveolar MIP-2 ρ=-0.17 (95% CI, -0.55 to 0.27), P=0.4
Alveolar KC ρ=-0.40 (95% CI, -0.70 to 0.03), P=0.06

17

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 53 of 59

Jabaudon et al. sRAGE predicts alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. Online Data Supplement

Parameter 0 1 2

i. Neutrophils in the alveolar space None 1-5 >5

ii. Neutrophils in the interstitial space None 1-5 >5

iii. Hyaline membranes None 1 >1

iv. Proteinous debris filling the airspaces None 1 >1

v. Alveolar septal thickening None 2x-4x >4x

Table E2 – Lung injury scoring system (adapted from Matute-bello et al(E2)).

18

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 54 of 59

188x236mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 55 of 59

263x360mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 56 of 59

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 57 of 59

246x482mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 58 of 59

244x431mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society


AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 01-May-2015 as 10.1164/rccm.201501-0020OC
Page 59 of 59

130x63mm (300 x 300 DPI)

Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society

You might also like