Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jessie Grace S. Martin, Joy Grace P. Doctor, Jonathan O. Obal, Claire S. Basitao
ABSTRACT
This micro-ethnography aimed to describe the ritual categories of the Dawak of the
Kalingas. A thick description of these ritual categories is presented using the ethnographic data
gathered and inferred from the researchers’ view. A Methodological Triangulation was employed
in this study using the developmental research sequence (DRS) by asking ethnographic
questions from key informants, causal and informal conversations with other participants,
collecting and analyzing field notes of what people do, know and the things they made and used
which they shared as a community. This study tried to elicit cultural patterns and their associated
meanings from the actions, events, words and artifacts used by the participants. This study found
that the purpose of the healing rituals and rites provide the avenues of opportunities for the
transmission of values, beliefs and way of life. Through these symbolic expressions, sentiments
were intensified and became a significant part in the life of the people belonging to this ethnic
community. In fact they formed the anchor on which ways of life were built up and values
transferred. In this age of globalization and liberalization, they are still significant and important at
the very core of the ordinary lives of Kalingas in Tabuk City.
INTRODUCTION
In his book, Mirror of Man, Clyde Kluckhohn, defined culture among others as “a total way of
life of a people; a social legacy the individual acquires from his group; a way of thinking, feeling
and believing.” It is this tacit knowledge of the culture that ethnography aims to draw out, find the
significance and meaning in the life of the participants, and by so doing the ethnographer learns
and confirms from the patterns observed, inferred and revealed by the participants themselves
that culture is a total way of life of a people.
Ritual is sacred. Rituals can help to restore a sense of balance to life. Although many of
us create ceremonies or rituals for one occasion or another, few understand why rituals help in
adjusting to change. Even fewer understand the power of ritual to strengthen the bonds that
connect us.
Ritual, the performance of ceremonial acts prescribed by tradition or by sacerdotal
decree. Ritual is a specific, observable mode of behavior exhibited by all known societies. It is
thus possible to view ritual as a way of defining or describing humans.
In this paper, we will be attempting to describe and analyze the ritual categories of the
“Dawak” (Kalinga healing Ritual) of the Kalingas in Tabuk, Kalinga Province using the data we
have collected from March 2009 to April 2011.
John J. Honnigmann describes ritual as the symbolic expression of the sentiments which
are attached to a given situation – person place, time, conception and things or occasion.. Ritual
takes also the values and beliefs of a religion and embodies them in actions. So that rituals are
considered as religion in action. It further creates a connection with the larger communities of
belief which is the result of the interactions between the persons, places and occasions making a
particular ritual a symbolic expression of the sentiments of a particular people. So that according
to Rosaldo, Keilty and Dumber, ritual becomes a key in unlocking one’s understanding of how
particular cultures work in particular circumstances.
Rituals of various kinds are a feature of almost all known human societies, past or
present. Human beings are sometimes described or defined as a basically rational,
economic, political, or playing species. They may, however, also be viewed as ritual beings, who
exhibit a striking parallel between their ritual and verbal behavior. Just as language is a system of
symbols that is based upon arbitrary rules, ritual may be viewed as a system of symbolic acts that
is based upon arbitrary rules.
The earliest approach was an attempt to explain ritual, as well as religion, by means of a
theory concerned with historical origin. In most cases, this theory also assumed an evolutionary
hypothesis that would explain the development of ritual behavior through history. The basic
premise, or law, for this approach is that ontogeny (development of an individual organism)
recapitulates phylogeny (evolution of a related group of organisms), just as the human embryo
recapitulates the stages of human evolutionary history in the womb—e.g., the gill stage. The
solution to explaining the apparently universal scope of ritual depended upon the success in
locating the oldest cultures and cults. Scholars believed that if they could discover this origin, they
would be able to explain the contemporary rituals of man.
The second approach to explaining ritual behavior is certainly indebted to the work of such
men as Smith, Freud, and Durkheim. Yet very few, if any, of the leading contemporary scholars
working on the problems of religion, ritual, and myth begin with a quest for origins. The origin-
evolutionary hypothesis of ritual behaviour has been rejected as quite inadequate for explaining
human behavior because no one can verify any of these bold ideas; they remain creative
speculations that cannot be confirmed or denied.
Turning from origin hypotheses, scholars next emphasized empirical data gathered by actual
observation. Contemporary literature is rich in descriptions of rituals observed throughout the
world. If the term origin can be used as central to the first approach, the term function can be
used as indicative of the primary focus of the second approach. The nature of ritual, in other
words, is to be defined in terms of its function in a society.
A third approach to the study of ritual is centered on the studies of historians of religion. The
distinction between this approach and the first two is that though many historians of religions
agree with functionalists that the origin-evolutionary theories are useless as hypotheses, they
also reject functionalism as an adequate explanation of ritual. Most historians of religions, such as
Gerardus van der Leeuw in the Netherlands, Rudolf Otto in Germany, Joachim Wach and Mircea
Eliade in the United States, and E.O. James in England, have held the view that ritual behaviour
signifies or expresses the sacred (the realm of transcendent or ultimate reality). This approach,
however, has never been represented as an explanation of ritual. The basic problem with it
remains that it cannot be confirmed unless scholars agree beforehand that such a transcendent
reality exists.
The cultural heritage of the Kalinga of the Philippines is very rich. This cultural heritage is
passed from generation to generation, usually by word of mouth and cultural rituals, and has
been the basis for agriculture, food preparation, health care, education, conservation and the
wide range of other activities that sustain a society and its environment in many parts of the world
2
for many centuries. The Kalinga Dawak is a healing ritual that became unpopular with the
introduction of Christianity. However, the Kalingas never quite abandoned these rituals as shown
by the continued presence and respect for the mandadawak. Recent developments in the social
sciences calling for exploration of cultural identities and local histories have influenced young
Kalinga professionals to discover their own culture.
This study is based on the concept that belief and practices are the identity of ethnic
groups. It addresses the existing problem on ethnocide which is the gradual change in ethnic
culture of indigenous people that eventually culminates to the death of ethnicity or loss of identity.
Hence, this study documented existing healing rituals of the Kalingas to ensure the
preservation of knowledge systems that has sustained this unique corner of the Philippines.
Moreover, this documentation is conducted for the purpose of education, presentation and
appreciation for the coming generation.
1. To establish whether there are patterns in the healing rituals of the Kalingas
2. To describe the Kalinga healing rituals
3. To ascertain the hidden meanings behind the established healing ritual patterns
METHODOLOGY
Location
Figure 1. Map of the Philippines Showing Figure 2. Map of Kalinga showing Tabuk
Kalinga Province
In this chapter, we will be presenting the ritual sequences of the Dawak in the order as they
occur, that is, from the preparatory rites up to the concluding rites. The ritual sequences were the
result of 2 years of observation which will serve as a grand tour, so to say, of what happened as
observed. We can notice in this presentation the intricacies and the details of the ritual which, are
symbolic expressions of the values, beliefs and sentiments of these people..
I. RITUAL SEQUENCES
RITUAL SEQUENCES
Interview
PREPARATORY RITES Diagnosis
Communion with the Spirit Healers
Preparation of Materials
A. PREPARATORY RITES
A1. Interview
The Mandadawak arrives at the house of the sick person in the morning of the day of the day of the
Dawak. She/he proceeds to interview the family on the nature of the illness. The interview is punctuated with
anecdotes on previous healing episodes of the mandadawak. The Mandadawak also eases the mood and
establishes connection by tracing kinship. From time to time the mandadawak mentions the names of
previous customers, mostly well-known members of the City. This is done to establish trust and create a
comfortable atmosphere.
4
A2. Diagnosis
The Mandadawak then approaches the sick person. He brings out a small bottle of coconut oil and
lets the sick person cover this with both palms. After a few minutes, the healer retrieves the bottle of coconut
oil. He raises the bottle against the light reading messages that only he can understand. Silently, he pours
oil on the hands of the sick person and spreads it liberally over the palm. He reads the palm and exclaims
that it is a good thing that they called for him to do the Dawak. He was just in time to save the poor soul.
Another week’s delay would have been fatal. He then proceeds to lay his hands over the head of the sick
person uttering words that only he could hear. He then requests to be alone so that he can talk with his
alungan or spirit healers.
B. BEGINNING RITES
B1. Setting the Ritual Space
After dinner, the mandadawak selects the room where the ritual will be done. The floor
is covered with the mat. The basket is placed in one corner of the mat and the basket is filled first
with old clothes of the sick person and his immediate family, the new blanket, then the ginamat or
tapis. Old coins, moma, a bowl of rice, a bowl of inandila with no ladok and dried tobacco leaf are
also placed inside the damus or basket. The Mandadawak also explains to the family what to
expect and what not to do during the ritual.
5
B3. Calling for the Lost Soul of the Sick Person ((Balaw-o)
The ritual commences with the sound of gongs accompanied by the beating of a ceramic bowl. At
this point the healer calls all the people to enter the house to be protected from malevolent spirits
(SANGASANG). Attendees to the Dawak must participate from the beginning until the end of the healing
ritual. Once the dawak started, nobody is allowed to leave. Immediate family of the sick person stand
facing the front door, calling out the soul (Kadudwa) of the sick person while other people ululate
(Ayaya).
6
C. HEALING RITUAL PROPER
After butchering the sacrificial animal, the healer resumes the ritual. He instructs some
volunteers to cook the meat for the fellowship dinner. He emphasizes that only salt will be
used and no other spices. Apparently spices, especially ginger and garlic, will offend and drive
away the spirit healers. The assistant places the special parts of the meat on the ritual space.
This signals the resumption of the ‘dawak’. The gongs are again played.
The healer shows off the meat offering. The healer is dancing with closed eyes yet she seems to
see everything. She dances around the room several times before sitting on the ritual mat. This
signals that healing activities can now start.
7
C5. Community Dance
D. CONCLUDING RITES
D1. Sacrificial Offerings (Atang)
8
D2. Fellowship Dinner
The social bonding established among those who attended the ritual extended to this
simple but profound and significant gathering after the ritual – the fellowship dinner. The
fellowship dinner is a celebration of an understanding between the spirit world and the community
that whatever disturbances caused by mortals is now forgiven and that the sacrificial offerings of
the family is sufficient as ransom. As Lee Edward Klosinski puts it, “Sharing food is a transaction
which involves a series of mutual obligations and which initiates an interconnected complex of
mutuality and reciprocity. Also, the ability of food to symbolize these relationships, as well as to
define group boundaries, surfaced as one of its unique properties …. Food exchanges are basic
to human interaction. Implicit in them is a series of obligations to give, receive and repay. These
transactions involve individuals in matrices of social; reciprocity, mutuality and obligation. Also
food exchanges are able to act as symbols of human interaction. Eating is a behavior, which
symbolizes feelings and relationships, mediates social status and power, and expresses the
boundaries of group identity.”1 So, the partaking and sharing in the fellowship become not just an
opportunity to build or establish a social bonding but a feeling of belongingness to one another as
a community.
D.3 Safe Passage (DUKYANG)
After dinner, the healer performs the safe passage ritual for those who want to leave. He
chants over a bowl of uncooked rice and pleads for the safe passage of those who are going
home. He seeks the protection of his spirit healers invoking the newly formed friendship with
other unseen spirits. He then places the bowl of rice by the front door. Those who wish to leave
may get a handful. The rice is dropped along the way to ward off evil spirits.
Those who opt to stay may continue with the merrymaking. In the meantime the healer
instructs the family on taboos after a ‘dawak’. Consultations are also done with other people who
wish to invite him/her for their own ‘dawak’.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The researchers have come to several conclusions in this study.
. 1. The Kalingas built the rites and rituals themselves. The way they celebrate, the way
they dance, the chants, the postures and the routines form traditional patterns which are
transmitted through generations.
2. The rites and rituals have a greater significance and impact in the daily lives of the
people. They form the anchor on which traditions can be built up and values can be transferred.
The healing rituals and rites provide the avenues of opportunities to socialize and to grow. One
cannot go away from a healing ritual or rite without being touched. This is the relevance of the
healing rituals such as the dawak as experienced by the Kalingas.
3. The intensification of Status Relationships and Social Relationships were transmitted to
them by their elder generations and in turn will have a good chance to be transmitted to the next
and present generation with all the nuances they have included which will form a pattern
themselves.
4. The experiences, activities and routines of the participants all throughout the day at home,
at work and wherever they were coming from converges into a focal point – the healing ritual or
“dawak.”
5. This is a ritual and rite that became part of the cultural knowledge of this Kalinga
community. It is indeed part of their way of life. As one of our informants capture in words, “Sana
pay matagoan da umili” (This is our life).
9
V. Recommendations
1. Additional observations of the dawak as performed in the other municipalities of
Kalinga should be conducted to determine similarities and differences in the healing ritual
patterns.
2. A thorough study of the ritual chants is recommended to discover the rich literary and
historical texts embedded in the chants that will give light to some of the gaps in the cultural and
historical development of Kalinga.
3, A follow-up study on the extent of practice and effectiveness of the healing rituals
should be conducted.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1. Arce, W. Systematic Qualitative Data Research: A1n Introduction for Filipino Practitioners. Office
of Research and Publications, Ateneo de Manila University. 2001.
2. Clyde Kluckhohn’s Mirror of Man in “Interpretation of Culture by Clifford Geertz”
( 1973)
3. Curtis, D. Roman Catholic Mass pp.58-67 in Kutache, P. Field Ethnography (1998).
4. Honnigmann, J. in the The World of Man, 1959: Chapter 31 “Ritual” pp.509-29.
5. Klosinski, L. The Meals in Mark, 1988, pp.56-58 in A Cultural Anthropological Analysis of the
Lukan Meal Scenes By Silvina E. Tejarres, mslt, 2003, p26.
6. Kutache, P. Field Ethnography : Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1998, pp.52-54.
7. Lewis, M. Paul (ed.), 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex.:
SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com).
8. Nichols, M. The Finer Points of Ritual: A Comparative Approach to Liturgical History, Theology
and Design. A Heartland Pagan Festival Keynote Address, August 29, 2000.
9. Ninnan, M. The liturgy of St. James of Jerusalem. (date not available)
10. Parel, C. et al. Social Survey Research Design. Philippine Social Science Center. University of
the Philippines, Inc., Quezon City. 1978.
11. Spradley, J. The Ethnograhic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. USA. 1979.
^ "An act to convert the municipal district of Tabuk, sub-province of Kalinga, Mountain Province,
into a regular municipality to be known as the municipality of Tabuk". LawPH.com. Retrieved
2011-04-09.^ http://www.op.gov.ph/directives/RA09404.pdf HB06005^
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/news/courtnews%20flash/2008/11/11180803.php granted a petition
^ SC reverses self, upholds creation of 16 cities
^ SC Reinstates 2008 Decision Voiding 16 Cityhood Laws
^ http://www.pia.gov.ph/?m=1&t=1&id=17453
10