Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/362797299
CITATIONS READS
0 14
3 authors, including:
Varun Vohra
Wayne State University
29 PUBLICATIONS 32 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Varun Vohra on 07 September 2022.
To cite this article: Andrea Setiawan, Varun Vohra & Emily Jaynes Winograd (2022):
Massive warfarin overdose management in an adolescent patient, Clinical Toxicology, DOI:
10.1080/15563650.2022.2116337
TEACHING CASE
CONTACT Emily Jaynes Winograd ejaynes@med.umich.edu Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
ß 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
2 A. SETIAWAN ET AL.
treatment of acute overdose in warfarin-naïve patients is not vitamin K administration but was followed by an increase to
well described. Further, treatment approaches following 3.4 approximately 48 h after vitamin K dose. By HD #7, the
acute massive warfarin ingestions are even less well charac- patient was deemed stable for transfer to inpatient psych-
terized, presenting a potential clinical quandary. We present iatry since he did not require additional doses of oral vitamin
a rare case of an intentional massive warfarin overdose in K 48 h post-initial administration and demonstrated no signs
an adolescent. or symptoms of bleeding despite an up-trending INR. A
repeat INR was checked on HD #18 and found to be normal
at 1.0.
Case presentation
A 15-year-old male (64.9 kg), with no history of chronic anti-
Discussion
coagulation, presented to an emergency department (ED)
after an intentional massive warfarin overdose. His past med- Acute warfarin ingestions in warfarin-naïve patients are infre-
ical history was significant for anxiety, depression, Tourette quently reported in the literature, with acute massive over-
syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and poly- doses even less well described. Despite established
substance use. On presentation, patient was afebrile with an guidelines providing clinicians with reversal strategies in the
oral temperature of 36.7 C, heart rate of 92 beats per setting of chronic warfarin use, management of acute over-
minute, blood pressure of 161/86 mm Hg, and respiratory doses in patients not chronically anticoagulated presents a
rate of 24 breaths per minute. Physical exam was otherwise clinical dilemma, namely whether to administer vitamin K as
unremarkable aside from facial tics consistent with patient’s soon as possible post-ingestion to prevent INR elevation and
Tourette syndrome. He was noted to be in no apparent dis- a potential bleeding event, or to hold vitamin K until a cer-
tress and conversational. The patient ingested his grandfa- tain INR or symptom threshold is reached. Our case involved
ther’s warfarin in a suicide attempt, reportedly ingesting 180 a large acute warfarin overdose in a pediatric patient with
warfarin 5 mg tablets and 100 warfarin 1 mg tablets over the no indication for anticoagulation who received vitamin K
course of five hours for a cumulative 1,000 mg dose (Table 1). once the INR exceeded 10. It is unknowable if treatment
The regional poison center was consulted and recommended with vitamin K prevented an adverse bleeding event, or if
administering activated charcoal, trending INR levels every earlier “prophylactic” administration of vitamin K would have
12 h, avoiding empiric administration of vitamin K, and prevented INR elevation.
obtaining routine toxicology labs and diagnostics (e.g. com- Case reports have cautioned that early administration of
plete metabolic panel, acetaminophen, salicylate, and etha- vitamin K may generate false reassurance among clinicians
nol levels, urine drug screen, and electrocardiogram). by normalizing the INR, thereby precluding the subjective
Approximately three hours post-ingestion, his initial INR was need for prolonged INR monitoring. Consequently, clinicians
1.1 and he was given a dose of activated charcoal. Due to may not detect a rebound increase in INR caused by inher-
complaints of a mild headache, computed tomography (CT) ent pharmacokinetic differences between vitamin K and war-
of the head was performed along with additional laborato- farin [5–10]. In an acute overdose in patients not chronically
ries, including acetaminophen, salicylate, and ethanol levels anticoagulated, some authors recommend administering vita-
and a urine drug screen, all of which were negative. min K for minimal INR elevations to mitigate bleeding risk
Approximately 16 h post-ingestion, the patient’s INR was 1.9. [11]. However, if vitamin K is administered within 48 h post-
He was subsequently transferred to a pediatric ED for fur- ingestion, patient monitoring for at least 5 days post-vitamin
ther evaluation and management. K administration is prudent due to the long duration of
Upon arrival to the pediatric ED, his repeat INR was 3.3 effect of warfarin [12,13]. While these recommendations are
and a comprehensive blood count and coagulation panel predicated upon warfarin’s pharmacokinetic profile, appropri-
were ordered every 12 h, based on initial poison center rec- ate management also depends on the amount of warfarin
ommendations. Additionally, the poison center recom- ingested as well as co-ingestions and/or chronic concomitant
mended, in accordance with the CHEST guidelines, holding medications affecting warfarin’s absorption and metabolism,
vitamin K for reversal until INR was >10 or the patient such as antifungals, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and
became symptomatic. In the case of an acute bleed, man- antiarrhythmics.
agement options included intravenous (IV) vitamin K along Acute bleeding events are the primary concern of a
with prothrombin complex concentrate, fresh frozen plasma rebound increase in INR due to inadequate monitoring.
(FFP), or factor VIIa. The patient was admitted to a general Previous case reports describe rebound INRs following war-
care floor for further observation and psychiatric evaluation. farin overdoses (range, 50 mg to 260 mg) when oral or paren-
His INR trended upward to 8.5 approximately 51 h post- teral vitamin K administration occurred within 48 h post-
ingestion, prompting a repeat consult with the poison cen- ingestion [5–10]. A 50-year-old male, on warfarin for history
ter, which recommended continuing to hold vitamin K unless of a massive pulmonary embolism, presented after an acute
bleeding developed or INR exceeded 10 (Figure 1). ingestion of an unknown amount of warfarin, received IV
The following morning on hospital day (HD) #4, the vitamin K 6 mg and was discharged at 40 h post-ingestion.
patient’s INR was >11.8 (maximum measurable value at insti- He was readmitted the following day at 69 h post-ingestion
tution), therefore 10 mg oral vitamin K was administered. A with epistaxis and an increase in INR to 7.8 requiring add-
subsequent downtrend in INR to 2.9 occurred 22 h post- itional doses of IV vitamin K over the next 48 h [5]. Montanio
CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 3
et al. described a 20-month-old male who ingested 50 mg of Vitamin K was held until INR was >4.5 and dosed at 2.5 mg
warfarin and was managed with activated charcoal plus orally 60 h post-ingestion. Her INR continued to trend up and
intramuscular (IM) vitamin K. Although the patient did not the patient was given a second dose of oral vitamin K
have any signs or symptoms of bleeding, his prothrombin 2.5 mg 85 h post-ingestion when her INR was 6.67. The
time was elevated three days post-ingestion and he was initi- patient was not medically cleared until HD #8 once the INR
ated on a three-day course of IM vitamin K [6]. Similarly, was <2.0 [11].
Ramanan et al. reported a 15-year-old male with an ingestion Our patient ingested 1,000 mg of warfarin, a dose mark-
of 350 mg warfarin plus 300 mg allopurinol and an initial INR edly higher than those described in previous case reports,
of 1.1; IV vitamin K was empirically administered. By HD #3, placing him at risk for ongoing anticoagulation and a poten-
no bleeding symptoms were noted but his INR increased to tially protracted course of vitamin K treatment. Oral vitamin
5.0 and he was given FFP. Due to the allopurinol-warfarin K was administered 65 h post-ingestion and the INR
drug interaction, he continued to have INR fluctuations decreased to 2.9 but was trending upwards (INR 3.4) at the
and required an additional dose of FFP and IV vitamin K time of transfer to inpatient psychiatry suggesting a potential
before levels normalized by HD #5 [7]. These cases rebound. The lack of regularly scheduled INR monitoring
highlight the importance of subsequent monitoring following between the observed rebound and subsequent INR check
vitamin K administration given warfarin’s pharmacokinetics 12 days later (14 days post-vitamin K administration) pre-
and potential for INR rebound despite improvement with cluded an accurate assessment of both the time course and
initial management. degree of INR rebound. This highlights a limitation of this
Withholding vitamin K does not ensure a shorter monitor- report since an accurate timeline of the effects of vitamin K
ing period, however. Watson and colleagues described a on warfarin kinetics could not be inferred. Further, this case
15-year-old female who ingested 100–200 mg of warfarin. highlights the need for frequent INR monitoring post-vitamin
4 A. SETIAWAN ET AL.