Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KNOWLEDGE
Involves the recall of specific and universals, the recall methods and processes, or the recall of
pattern structures and students
Student can;
Write, list and define his knowledge if he have
COMPREHENSION
Refers to a type of understanding and apprehension such as the individual knows what is being
communicated
Students translates, comprehends interprets based on prior learning like;
Explain, Summarize, paraphrase and describe
APPLICATION
Refers to the use of abstractions in particular and concrete situation.
Students selects, transfers and uses data and principles to complete a problem with a minimum
of direction
How student can use compute and apply his knowledge
Ex: 100-15 = 85
ANALYSIS
Breakdown of communication into its constituent elements or parts
students classify, distinguishes and relates the evidence or structure of a statement or a
question
Student can analyze, compare and categorize and separate
Ex: Old Capital of Pakistan? New Capital? Why? analysis
SYNTHESIS
Involves the putting together of elements and part so as to form a whole.
Students originates, integrates and combine ideas into a product, a plan or proposal that is new
to him
He can create, design, invent and develop
He can combine different types of information to find alternative solution.
Ex: Some examples of synthesis questions include … “How would you assemble these items to create a
windmill?” “How would your life be different if you could breathe under water?” “Construct a tower
one foot tall using only four blocks.
EVALUATION
Student can judge what he learned weather its right or wrong. If wrong the he can start the
process again.
Student can judge, recommend, critique and justify
AFFECTIVE DOMAIN
Skills in the affective domain describe the way people react emotionally and their ability to feel
other living things pain or joy. Affective objectives typically target the awareness and growth
in attitudes, emotions or feelings
There are 5 levels in the affective domain moving through the lowest –order processes to the
highest
Receiving
Responding
Valuing
Organizing and
Characterizing
PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN
Skills in this domain describe the ability to physically manipulate a tool or student like a hand
hammer.
Its objectives usually focus on change or in the development in behavior and on skill.
Blooms and his colleagues never create subcategories for skill in the psychomotor
TOPICS: REVISED BLOOMS TAXONOMY
After 45 years since the publication of Bloom's taxonomy, a group led by LORIN ANDERSON (Bloom's
former student) and DAVID KRATHWOHL led a new group of experts to work together. The result was
what is now called the revised taxonomy.
1. Levels or categories of thinking in the old taxonomy were nouns, while in the revised taxonomy they
are verbs. The use of action words instead of nouns was done to highlight that thinking is an active
process. For example, evaluate instead of evaluation, or analyze instead of analysis.
2. While the revised taxonomy remains to be in hierarchical levels of increasing complexity, it is
intended to be more flexible, in that it allows the categories to overlap. For example, some action
words in understand level, like explain, may appear to be more complex than the action word, show in
the apply level. However, when we look into the six levels from remember to create, we will still find
that. Over-all the taxonomy proceeds in a hierarchical order
3. The knowledge level was changed to remember. The change was made because, knowledge does
not refer to a cognitive or thinking level. Knowledge is the object of the thinking. Remember is more
appropriate word for the first thinking level which involves recalling and retrieving knowledge.
4. The comprehension level was changed to understand. Teachers a likely to use the word understand
when referring to their work rather than comprehension.
5. Synthesis was changed to create and was placed as the highest level.
6.The cognitive domain now includes two dimensions, the cognitive dimension and the knowledge
dimension. The knowledge dimension of the revised taxonomy was based on the subcategories of
knowledge in the old taxonomy.
The revised taxonomy highlights two dimensions, the cognitive and the knowledge dimensions. The
cognitive dimension includes the hierarchical or ordered levels of thinking. The thinking levels move from
the simplest to the most complex.
The levels are, remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create. The knowledge dimension
includes the four knowledge categories factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive. The knowledge that
teachers aim to teach and students aim to learn can be about facts, concepts, procedures and metacognitive
knowledge.
When you formulate learning objectives, you consider what level of thinking (cognitive) you want your
students to achieve, and also what type of knowledge it is you want to teach.
When we write a learning objective, the level of thinking is represented by the verb, while the knowledge
dimensions' is represented by the noun. In the example, At the end of the lesson, the learner will be able to: •
explain the photosynthesis process,
• explain is the action word which will fall under the second cognitive dimension level, understand, and
photosynthesis is the noun that will fall under procedural knowledge.
Uses of the Revised Taxonomy
The revised taxonomy provides a framework that helps educators in the following ways:
1. It provides educators with a common set of terms and levels about learning objectives that help in
planning across subject matter and grade levels.
2. It helps in the drafting of learning standards across levels.
3. It serves as a guide in evaluating the school’s curriculum objectives, activities and assessment.
4. It guides the teacher in formulating learning objectives that tap higher-order thinking skills.
Examples:
Objective test- appropriate for the various levels of the hierarchy of educational objectives.
This include test (multiple-choice, true or false, matching type or short answer test), essays,
examinations, and checklists.
Essay-when properly planned, can test the students grasp of high-level cognitive skills particularly in
areas of application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation.
4. ORAL QUESTIONING
Commonly called “oral recitation”, it is through oral communication and interaction with them
determines how much students have learned. It assesses student’s stock knowledge and \ or assesses
the ability to communicate ideas in organized manner.
Given the importance of assessment for student learning, it is important to consider how to best measure the
learning that you want your students to achieve. Assessment should integrate grading, learning, and
motivation for your students. Well-designed assessment methods provide valuable information about student
learning. They tell us what students learned, how well they learned it, and where they struggled. Good
assessments allow you to answer the question,