You are on page 1of 2

La Trobe Business School

Marking Rubric for MGT5EBP: Assignment 2 – Group Venture Analysis Report

STUDENT NAME: DATE:


CRITERIA Excellent (10-9 marks) Very good (8-7 marks) Good (6-5 marks) Fair /Poor (4-3 marks) Very Poor (2-0 marks) MARK

Accurately describe ☐ All main descriptions ☐ All main descriptions ☐ Most main ☐ Some descriptions ☐ Main descriptions
the entrepreneur identified and presented in identified and presented descriptions identified identified and presented, poorly identified or
venture, its nature, a deep and insightful and presented. others missed completely missed
economic impact and manner.
interaction with the
ecosystem
(20% of total mark)
Effectively analyse ☐ Insightful and deep ☐ Strong analysis of all ☐ Good analysis of ☐ Fair analysis of some ☐ Poor or incomplete
how the entrepreneur analysis of all relevant relevant opportunities, most relevant opportunities but not analysis of
pursued opportunities, applied with some minor missing opportunities, with others opportunities
opportunities, comprehensively and links decent understanding
followed processes consistently of others
and frameworks; and
grew the business
(20% of total mark)
Critically review and ☐ Insightful and deep ☐ Strong description of ☐ Good description of ☐ Fair description of ☐ Poor or incomplete
use information (such description of all relevant all relevant components most relevant some components of description of
as literature) to components of of entrepreneurial components of entrepreneurial finance, entrepreneurial
describe entrepreneurial finance, finance, law and entrepreneurial law and marketing but finance, law and
entrepreneurial law and marketing, marketing, with some finance, law and not others marketing
finance, law and applied comprehensively minor missing links marketing, with decent
marketing of the and consistently understanding of
venture others
(20% of total mark)
Effectively apply and ☐ Insightful, broad and ☐ Strong applications ☐ Good applications ☐ Partial applications ☐ Poor or incomplete
interpret sustained deep applications and and interpretations of and interpretations of and interpretations of applications and
entrepreneurship interpretations of innovation, growth, innovation, growth, innovation, growth, interpretations of
arguments to provide innovation, growth, sustainability and wealth sustainability and sustainability and wealth innovation, growth,
insights with regard sustainability and wealth creation of the venture wealth creation of the creation of the venture sustainability and
to innovation, growth, creation of the venture venture wealth creation of the
sustainability and venture
wealth creation
(which may include
exit strategies) of the
venture
(10% of total mark)
Effective conclusions ☐ All main points ☐ All main points ☐ Most main points ☐ Some points identified ☐ Main points poorly
and cohesiveness of cohesively identified and cohesively identified and identified and and demonstrated, demonstrated or
the report to demonstrated in a deep demonstrated demonstrated others missed completely missed
demonstrate active and insightful manner.
teamwork
participation
(10% of total mark)
Effective and ☐ Excellent structure ☐ Clear structure, ☐ Overall structure ☐ Generally structured. ☐ Unclear or messy
professional structure that emphasizes quality of applied consistently clear and useful, but Some grammar & structure. Obvious
and language of the work. Excellent grammar across the report. Good structure within ideas spelling errors and use spelling & grammar
report, including & spelling and use of grammar & spelling and can be improved. of references. errors and use of
appropriate use of references. use of references. Good grammar & references.
referencing (at least 5 spelling and use of
references) references.
Creativity and Insightful and creative Clear and good video Satisfactory, but video Generally relays the Creativity and
innovation of video video presenation. presenation. presentation lacks message, but lacks innovation significantly
presentation significant innovation overall creativity. lacking in presentation.
(20% of total mark) and creativity.
Examiner: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: TOTAL
MARK
/10
%

You might also like