You are on page 1of 94

BMJ Open is committed to open peer review.

As part of this commitment we make the peer review


history of every article we publish publicly available.

When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses
online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the
versions that the peer review comments apply to.

The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review
process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited
or distributed as the published version of this manuscript.

BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of
record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-
per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com).

If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email
editorial.bmjopen@bmj.com
BMJ Open

Does Cesarean Delivery Increase the Occurrence of


Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Asthma or Obesity in
Childhood?
Fo
Journal: BMJ Open

Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-017086

Article Type: Research


rp

Date Submitted by the Author: 30-Mar-2017

Complete List of Authors: Chen, Ginden; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public
Health, National Taiwan University; Chung Shan Medical University
ee

Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology


Chiang, Wan-Lin ; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of
Public Health, National Taiwan University
Shu, Bih-Ching; National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine,
rr

Institute of Allied Health Sciences


Guo, Yueliang; National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Department
of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
Chiou, Shu-Ti; National Yang-Ming University,
ev

Chiang, Tung-liang; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of


Public Health, National Taiwan University

<b>Primary Subject
ie

Paediatrics
Heading</b>:

Secondary Subject Heading: Public health, Obstetrics and gynaecology


w

Cesarean delivery, neurodevelopmental disorders, Asthma < THORACIC


Keywords:
MEDICINE, obesity, vaginal delivery
on
ly

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml


Page 1 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Does Cesarean Delivery Increase the Occurrence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Asthma or
4
5 Obesity in Childhood?
6
7
8
Ginden Chen MD, PhD1,2,3, Wan-Lin Chiang PhD1, Bih-Ching Shu PhD4, Yueliang Guo MD, PhD5
9 Shu-Ti Chiou PhD6, Tung-liang Chiang ScD1
10
11
12 Affiliations:
13 1
Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University,
14
15 Taipei, Taiwan
Fo
16 2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung,
17
18 Taiwan
19 3
Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
rp
20 4
21 Department of Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
5
22 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU)
23
College of Medicine and NTU Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
ee

24
6
25 Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
26
27
rr

28 Address correspondence to:


29 Tung-liang Chiang, Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National
30
ev

31 Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei, 10055 Taiwan, [tlchiang@ntu.edu.tw],
32 886-2-33668059.
33
34
ie

35 Keywords: Cesarean delivery, neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, obesity, vaginal delivery


36
w

37
38 Abstract word count: 250
39
Text word count: 2,810
40
on

41 Tables: 4
42 Number of references: 40
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
1
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 2 of 29

1
2
3 ABSTRACT
4
5 Objectives Whether birth by Cesarean section (CS) increases the occurrence of neurodevelopmental
6 disorders, asthma or obesity in childhood is controversial. We used a cohort data to demonstrate the
7
8
association between children born by CS and the occurrence of the above three diseases at the age of
9 5.5 years.
10
11
12 Methods The database of the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) which was designed to assess the
13 developmental trajectories of children was used in this study. Associations between children born by
14
15 CS and these three diseases were evaluated before and after controlling for gestational age (GA) at
Fo
16 birth, children’s characteristics and disease-related predisposing factors.
17
18
19 Results Children born by CS had significant increases in neurodevelopmental disorders (20%),
rp
20
21 asthma (14%), and obesity (18%) compared to children born by vaginal delivery. The association
22 between neurodevelopmental disorders and CS was attenuated after controlling for GA at birth (OR:
23
1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders steadily declined with
ee

24
25 increasing GA up to ≤40-42 weeks. CS and childhood asthma were not significantly associated after
26 controlling for parental history of asthma and GA at birth. Obesity in childhood remained
27
rr

28 significantly associated with cesarean delivery (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07-1.32) after controlling for
29 GA and disease-related factors.
30
ev

31
32 Conclusions Our results implied that the association between CS birth and children’s
33
34 neurodevelopmental disorders is largely explained by GA. CS birth was weakly associated with
ie

35 childhood asthma since parental asthma and preterm births are stronger predisposing factors. The
36
association between CS birth and childhood obesity was robust after controlling for disease-related
w

37
38 factors.
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
2
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 3 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
4
5  Our database simultaneously demonstrates whether neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and
6 obesity are associated with modes of delivery after controlling for potential confounding
7
8
factors.
9  We evaluated dose-dependent effects of gestation age on the occurrence of these diseases.
10
 Indications for Cesarean section were derived from self-reports by mothers or reports by
11
12 primary care-givers, not from medical record.
13  We might ignore the possibility that these disorders might occur in combination because we
14
15 looked at associations among these three disorders and modes of delivery mutually exclusive.
Fo
16
17
18
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
3
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 4 of 29

1
2
3
4 INTRODUCTION
5
6
7 With an escalating rate of cesarean sections worldwide, literature has demonstrated that infants
8
9
10 born by Cesarean section (CS) may encounter different flora, and lack of compression in the birth
11
12
13 canal may increase the risk of disturbed respiratory adaptation or neurological adaptation during their
14
15
first days of life, compared to those delivered vaginally.[1-3] Cesarean delivery also alters gut
Fo
16
17
18
microbiotic composition in early infancy.[4] However, whether modes of delivery also result in
19
rp
20
21 long-term physiological consequences in childhood or influence later physical well-being needs
22
23
ee

24 further investigation.
25
26
27 Kapellou pointed out that the delivery of infants before 39 weeks can not only increase
rr

28
29
30 respiratory morbidity, but may also interrupt intrauterine brain maturation and have a significant
ev

31
32
33 impact on future neurodevelopment.[5] Animal studies have shown that CS may affect development
34
ie

35
36 of neurons and that some fetal brain developmental processes continue into the neonatal period.[6,7]
w

37
38
39 In the past, mode of delivery has been shown to potentially affect normal intestinal colonization in
40
on

41
42 infants as demonstrated by checking fecal flora.[8] However, the correlation between CS and later
43
44
ly

45
neurodevelopmental disorders is still controversial.
46
47
Overweight children and increase of allergic diseases have been reported to be associated with
48
49
50 CS delivery based on the hygiene hypothesis.[9-13] A meta-analysis demonstrated a 20% increase in
51
52
53 the subsequent risk of asthma in children who had been delivered by CS.[9] A population-based
54
55
56 cohort study found a moderately increased risk of asthma in the children delivered by CS and also
57
58
59
4
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 5 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 found that this association was stronger for preterm children than for term children.[14] However,
5
6
7 some longitudinal studies show no associations between subsequent risk of developing childhood
8
9
10 asthma, wheeling episodes or atopic dermatitis and infants delivered by CS after controlling for their
11
12
13 parental allergy history.[15,16] Epidemiological studies also revealed an association between CS and
14
15
overweight or obese preschool age children.[10,11] Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis
Fo
16
17
18
indicated that CS is only moderately associated with overweight and obese children.[17] The
19
rp
20
21 inconsistent association between delivery modes and childhood allergies as well as
22
23
ee

24 overweight/obesity also needs clarification by further study.


25
26
27 In this study, we used data from the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) to demonstrate whether
rr

28
29
30 neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and obesity at the age of 5.5 years are associated with modes
ev

31
32
33 of delivery after controlling for potential confounding factors. We also aimed to determine whether
34
ie

35
36 there are any dose-dependent effects of gestation age (GA) on the occurrence of these three diseases.
w

37
38
39 MATERIALS AND METHODS
40
on

41
42 Study population and setting
43
44
ly

45
Data used in this study were derived from the TBCS. The TBCS has been designed to assess the
46
47
developmental trajectories of Taiwanese children and financially sponsored by the Health Promotion
48
49
50 Administration in Taiwan. The study protocol and questionnaires were approved by the
51
52
53 Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics in the Executive Yuan, according to the
54
55
56 Statistics Act of Taiwan. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at National
57
58
59
5
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 6 of 29

1
2
3
4 Taiwan University Hospital (No. 201604055RINC).
5
6
7 By using two-stage stratified random sampling, the TBCS selected a nationally representative
8
9
10 sample of 24,200 children born in 2005 from the National Birth Report Database, with a sampling
11
12
13 rate of approximately 11.7%. Before children reached school age, face-to-face survey interviews
14
15
with mothers or primary caregivers were conducted at 6 months, 18 months, 36 months, and 5.5
Fo
16
17
18
years of age, with response rates of 87.8%, 94.9%, 93.7%, and 92.8%, respectively. Our study
19
rp
20
21 sample included 19,721 children who participated the first and fourth surveys. The content of both
22
23
ee

24 surveys contains questions about the child’s developmental, behavioral, and health outcomes, as well
25
26
27 as detailed information on family characteristics including socioeconomic conditions, parenting
rr

28
29
30 practices, and the parents’ health and well-being.
ev

31
32
33 Children’s health status, modes of delivery and gestational age
34
ie

35
36 In this study, we focused on childhood obesity, asthma and neurodevelopmental disorders.
w

37
38
39 Childhood obesity was defined by the body mass index set by the Taiwan Bureau of Health
40
on

41
42 Promotion for preschool children. Children with asthma were classified after a physician’s evaluation
43
44
ly

45
or diagnosis. Learning disabilities, developmental delay, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,
46
47
sensory integration disorder, and autism were diagnosed and evaluated by pediatric psychiatrists and
48
49
50 clinical psychologists. Children with neurodevelopmental disorders were categorized as those having
51
52
53 any or a combination of learning disabilities, developmental delay, attention deficit hyperactivity
54
55
56 disorder, sensory integration disorder, or autism, according to the classification of the DSM-V
57
58
59
6
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 7 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 published on May 27, 2013.[18]
5
6
7 Information about the mode of delivery (vaginal or Cesarean delivery) and gestational age was
8
9
10 also collected from Taiwanese birth certificates in 2005. GA was stratified as: preterm (< 37 weeks),
11
12
13 term (37 to 41 weeks), and post-term (42 weeks or more). In order to evaluate the influence of GA on
14
15
the associations of CS with the occurrence of the above three diseases, we further divided term
Fo
16
17
18
pregnancy into 37 weeks, 38 weeks, 39 weeks, and 40-41 weeks for comparison.
19
rp
20
21 Parental characteristics used as control variables
22
23
ee

24 Mothers’ educational levels were classified as compulsory school (less than 9 years of
25
26
27 schooling), senior high school, junior college, college and above. Household monthly income was
rr

28
29
30 categorized as less than 30,000 New Taiwan Dollars (NTD), 30,000-100,000 NTD, and more than
ev

31
32
33 100,000 NTD (30 NTD≒1 USD). Gestational weight gain among the mothers was regrouped as less
34
ie

35
36 than 11 kilograms and 11 kilograms or more. The occurrence of gestational diabetes diagnosed
w

37
38
39 during prenatal care visits was also recorded. Parental history of asthma was recorded at the first
40
on

41
42 survey.
43
44
ly

45
Statistical analysis
46
47
Children’s characteristics, obesity, asthma, and neurodevelopmental disorders were compared
48
49
50 with Chi-square tests. Obesity, asthma, and neurodevelopmental disorders associated with Cesarean
51
52
53 section were evaluated using logistic multiple regression analyses after controlling for GA and
54
55
56 characteristics of children and parents. The Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was used to check
57
58
59
7
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 8 of 29

1
2
3
4 dose-dependent effects on the occurrence of these three diseases across the preterm, early term
5
6
7 period of 37-40 weeks (GA at 37 weeks - <38 weeks, 38 weeks - <39weeks, 39 weeks - <40 weeks)
8
9
10 and ≧40 weeks. Alpha level was set as 0.01. All statistical analyses were performed using the
11
12
13 Statistical Analysis Software package, SAS version 9.3.
14
15
RESULTS
Fo
16
17
18
In total, data of 19,721 children were successfully collected: neurodevelopmental disorders,
19
rp
20
21 19,717, asthma, 19,720 and obesity, 13,669. The children’s and parental characteristics are shown in
22
23
ee

24 Table 1. The prevalence of children’s neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma and obesity were
25
26
27 significantly difference between birth by CS and vaginal delivery (4.7% vs. 3.8%, 7.3% vs. 6.3%,
rr

28
29
30 16.2% vs. 13.9%; respectively, all p < 0.01).
ev

31
32
33 Association between Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Cesarean Delivery
34
ie

35
36 Table 2 shows predisposing factors that might influence an association between
w

37
38
39 neurodevelopmental disorders and birth by CS. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)
40
on

41
42 for Cesarean delivery were 1.22 and 1.05-1.42 after controlling for children’s and parental
43
44
ly

45
characteristics. Gender was significantly associated with children’s neurodevelopmental disorders
46
47
(OR for male: 2.16). A young maternal age at childbirth was found to be a protective factor against
48
49
50 neurodevelopmental disorders in the children. Monthly household income had an inverse association
51
52
53 with the occurrence of children’s neurodevelopmental disorders.
54
55
56 The association between neurodevelopmental disorders and birth by CS was attenuated after
57
58
59
8
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 9 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 controlling for GA in regression model (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Children born at a gestational
5
6
7 age of less than 37 weeks was significantly associated with more neurodevelopmental disorders (OR:
8
9
10 1.94; 95% CI: 1.55-2.42).
11
12
13 Association between Asthma and Cesarean Delivery
14
15
Table 3 shows that asthma was associated with birth by CS (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.30) after
Fo
16
17
18
controlling for children’s and parental characteristics (Table 2). Gender and first-born children had a
19
rp
20
21 significant association with childhood asthma (ORs for males and first-born child: 1.40 and 1.23). A
22
23
ee

24 lower maternal educational level was a protective factor against childhood asthma. Children born in
25
26
27 families with a lower monthly income had fewer occurrences of asthma.
rr

28
29
30 The association between asthma and children born by CS was attenuated after controlling for
ev

31
32
33 GA (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.98-1.25). Children born at a GA of less than 37 weeks (OR: 1.27; 95% CI:
34
ie

35
36 1.03-1.56) had a significant association with more asthma. CS and childhood asthma were not
w

37
38
39 significantly associated after further controlling parental history of asthma. However, children born
40
on

41
42 at a GA of less than 37 weeks and a mother’s educational level were still associated with more
43
44
ly

45
asthma. Parental history of asthma was more significantly associated with childhood asthma (OR:
46
47
3.62; 95% CI: 2.88-4.55).
48
49
50 Association between Childhood Obesity and Cesarean Delivery
51
52
53 Table 4 shows that childhood obesity was associated with birth by CS (OR: 1.19; 95% CI:
54
55
56 1.08-1.32) after controlling for children’s and parental characteristics. Gender, first-born children and
57
58
59
9
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 10 of 29

1
2
3
4 lower maternal education level were predisposing factors for childhood obesity. We found that
5
6
7 obesity in childhood remained significantly associated with Cesarean delivery (OR: 1.19; 95% CI:
8
9
10 1.07-1.32) after controlling for GA. Children born post-term had a significant association with
11
12
13 childhood obesity. Male gender, first-born child and lower maternal educational level were also
14
15
associated with obesity in childhood. Furthermore, birth by CS and childhood obesity were still
Fo
16
17
18
associated when we included gestational diabetes (OR: 1.49) and maternal gestational weight gain
19
rp
20
21 (≧ 11kg; OR: 1.17) as control variables.
22
23
ee

24 Dose Effect of GA on These Three Disorders


25
26
27 Further, we found that there was an association between CS at a GA of less than 37 weeks and
rr

28
29
30 neurodevelopmental disorders with a dose effect of GA until term. The association of premature birth
ev

31
32
33 and neurodevelopmental disorders also existed in the regression analysis while excluding the
34
ie

35
36 children born by primary CS due to mandatory medical factors. The risk of occurrence of
w

37
38
39 neurodevelopmental disorders steadily declined with increasing GA up to 39 - <42 weeks (data not
40
on

41
42 shown). However, there was no dose effect of the GA until term on childhood asthma and obesity.
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
10
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 11 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 DISCUSSION
5
6
7 In this study, children born by CS had significant increases in neurodevelopmental disorders
8
9
10 (20%), asthma (14%), and obesity (18%) compared to children born by vaginal delivery. However,
11
12
13 except for obesity, associations between CS births and children’s neurodevelopmental disorders or
14
15
asthma were attenuated after controlling for GA and potential disease-related predisposing factors.
Fo
16
17
18
Effect of GA on These Three Disorders
19
rp
20
21 Our results are consistent with the findings of MacKay et al.[19] We found that the risk of
22
23
ee

24 occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders was significantly associated with a GA of less than 37


25
26
27 weeks and steadily declined with increasing GA up to ≤40 - <42 weeks and with a dose effect of the
rr

28
29
30 gestation until term. These results support the hypothesis proposed by Kapellou which implies that
ev

31
32
33 the fetal brain develops and matures toward the end of gestation.[5] Our results also seem to
34
ie

35
36 indirectly provide data to support that neurodevelopmental outcomes are affected by premature
w

37
38
39 interruption of intrauterine life.[20,21]
40
on

41
42 Literature has revealed that preterm births, a younger GA at birth and low birth weight are
43
44
ly

45
associated with childhood asthma.[14,22] Tollanes et al. reported that an association between birth
46
47
by CS and increased risk of asthma was stronger for preterm children than for term children.
48
49
50 Sonnenschein-van der Voort et al. further found that “the association of lower birth weight with
51
52
53 childhood asthma was largely explained by younger gestational age at birth”. Our results revealed
54
55
56 that the association between GA at birth and children’s asthma was attenuated after further
57
58
59
11
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 12 of 29

1
2
3
4 controlling for parental history of asthma.
5
6
7 Our results also showed that there were no associations between preterm, late-preterm, or term
8
9
10 at birth and childhood obesity. But childhood obesity was significantly associated with children born
11
12
13 post-term before and after controlling for gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational weight gain.
14
15
Association between Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Cesarean Delivery
Fo
16
17
18
Our results do not support the association between CS and neurodevelopmental disorders in
19
rp
20
21 childhood after controlling for GA. GA at birth, especially preterm births, largely explained the
22
23
ee

24 association between CS births and neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood. This phenomenon is


25
26
27 consistent with the viewpoint of Kapellou et al.[20] and Woythaler et al.[21]
rr

28
29
30 In addition to GA at birth, we also found that neurodevelopmental disorders occurred more in
ev

31
32
33 boys than in girls. However, recent literature has revealed that the increased risk of
34
ie

35
36 neurodevelopmental disorders in boys cannot exclude sex bias.[23,24] In this study, children with
w

37
38
39 neurodevelopmental disorders were diagnosed and evaluated by pediatric psychiatrists and clinical
40
on

41
42 psychologists, which might help to avoid the male bias.
43
44
ly

45
Associations between maternal age and neurodevelopmental disorders in longitudinal or cohort
46
47
studies are controversial.[25,26] Our study showed that a young maternal age at childbirth is as a
48
49
50 protective factor. Literature showed that parental socioeconomic status such as low familial income
51
52
53 is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.[27-29] We found that a higher
54
55
56 familial income is a protective factor against the occurrence of children’s neurodevelopmental
57
58
59
12
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 13 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 disorders.
5
6
7 Association between Asthma and Cesarean Delivery
8
9
10 A study in the UK in 2004 showed that an adjusted OR of delivery by CS is not associated with
11
12
13 the subsequent development of physician-diagnosed asthma, wheezing or atopy in later childhood.
14
15
[15] Another population-based cohort study conducted by Juhn et al. in the USA also revealed that
Fo
16
17
18
mode of delivery is not associated with subsequent risk of developing childhood asthma or wheezing
19
rp
20
21 episodes after calculating their cumulative incidence rate and adjusting hazard ratios.[16] In this
22
23
ee

24 study, children’s asthma was no significant associated with CS births after further controlling for GA
25
26
27 and parental history of asthma.
rr

28
29
30 Kolokotroni et al. reported that children with a family history of allergies enhance the positive
ev

31
32
33 association between CS delivery and asthma outcomes.[12] Xu et al. revealed that maternal history
34
ie

35
36 of asthma (hazard ratio: 3.71) was strongly associated with offspring asthma.[30] In this study,
w

37
38
39 children born to a parent with a history of asthma was significantly associated with children’s asthma.
40
on

41
42 Our results concur with the findings of Delbley et al. They noted that in addition to the hygiene
43
44
ly

45
hypothesis, factors including genetics, intrauterine environment and premature birth might also
46
47
influence the association between birth by CS and childhood asthma.[31]
48
49
50 In this study, boys and first-born child were also positively associated with and maternal
51
52
53 educational level was negatively associated with the occurrence of childhood asthma other than CS
54
55
56 and parental history of asthma. Mersha et al. showed that both genetic and gene expression data have
57
58
59
13
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 14 of 29

1
2
3
4 sex-based differences in the genomic association with asthma.[32] A significant association between
5
6
7 first-born children and childhood asthma might be consistent with the hypothesis of “in utero
8
9
10 ‘birth-order’ T-cell programming” postulated by Kragh et al. which does not support the hygiene
11
12
13 hypothesis. Kragh et al. revealed that first-born infants display a reduced anti-inflammatory profile in
14
15
T cells at birth which may contribute to later development of immune-mediated diseases by
Fo
16
17
18
increasing overall immune reactivity in first-born children compared to younger siblings.[33]
19
rp
20
21 However, negative associations between maternal educational levels and childhood asthma are
22
23
ee

24 inconsistent with other studies. Renz-Polster et al. did not find that maternal education levels
25
26
27 influenced the occurrence of childhood asthma.[34] Hermann et al. reported that lower parental
rr

28
29
30 educational levels result in a higher prevalence of childhood asthma.[35]
ev

31
32
33 Association between Childhood Obesity and Cesarean Delivery
34
ie

35
36 The association between CS births and childhood obesity was robust after including GA,
w

37
38
39 gestational diabetes and maternal gestational weight gain as potential predisposing factors. Our
40
on

41
42 findings were consistent with the epidemiological study conducted by Huh et al.[11] and a systematic
43
44
ly

45
review and meta-analysis by Li et al.[17] However, Pei et al. only found a greater likelihood of
46
47
obesity at the age of 2 years in their CS group, but not at the ages of 6 and 10 years in a prospective
48
49
50 cohort study in Germany which were inconsistent with our results.[36]
51
52
53 In addition, boys, first-born children and lower maternal educational levels were also
54
55
56 significantly associated with childhood obesity in current study. Matthiessen et al. reported that
57
58
59
14
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 15 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 maternal educational level is inversely associated with childhood obesity, especially in boys.[37]
5
6
7 Fradkin et al. found that children growing up with a high socioeconomic status are associated with a
8
9
10 lower risk of childhood obesity, but with variations across race/ethnicity and gender.[38]
11
12
13 Literature reveals that children born to mothers with excessive gestational weight gain and
14
15
gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with a higher risk of childhood obesity.[39,40] Our
Fo
16
17
18
results also showed that children born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus and higher
19
rp
20
21 gestational weight gain have a higher risk of childhood obesity.
22
23
ee

24 Limitations of this study


25
26
27 There are several limitations in this study. First, we did not evaluate relationships of childhood
rr

28
29
30 obesity and parental body mass index which is included in the TBCS. We used gestational weight
ev

31
32
33 gain as an associated factor instead of parental body mass index since parental body mass index may
34
ie

35
36 be influenced by other lifestyle habits. Second, indications for CS in this study were derived from
w

37
38
39 self-reports by mothers or reports by primary care-givers, not from medical record. Some
40
on

41
42 information related to these disorders might be omitted. Last, we looked at associations among these
43
44
ly

45
three disorders and modes of delivery mutually exclusive, but we may have ignored the possibility
46
47
that these disorders might occur in combination.
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
15
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 16 of 29

1
2
3
4 CONCLUSIONS
5
6
7 Our results implied that the association between CS birth and children’s neurodevelopmental
8
9
10 disorders is largely explained by GA. CS birth was weakly associated with childhood asthma since
11
12
13 parental asthma and preterm labor are stronger predisposing factors. The association between CS
14
15
birth and childhood obesity is robust after controlling for related factors.
Fo
16
17
18
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
16
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 17 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Acknowledgements We appreciate Dr. Jeng-Dau Tsai from the Department of Pediatrics and Dr.
4
5 Vincent Chin-Hung Chen from the Department of Psychiatry at Chung Shan Medical University
6 Hospital for kindly providing their expert opinion to help us interpret and classify our findings on
7
8
neurodevelopmental disorders. We thank all the children and their parents who participated in this
9 study, the interviewers who helped with data collection and all of the study groups who participated
10
in the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS).
11
12
13 Contributor’s statements:
14
15 Ginden Chen interpreted data, wrote drafts, revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript
Fo
16 as submitted.
17
18 Wan-Lin Chiang carried out the initial analyses, analyzed research data and approved the final
19 manuscript as submitted.
rp
20
21 Bih-Ching Shu, Yue-Liang Guo and Shu-Ti Chiou interpreted research data and approved the final
22 manuscript as submitted.
23
Tung-liang Chiang conceptualized and designed the study, revised the initial manuscript and
ee

24
25 approved the final manuscript as submitted.
26
27
rr

28 All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of
29 the work.
30
ev

31
32 Funding source: sponsored by the Health Promotion Administration, Department of Health and
33
34 Welfare in Taiwan (DOH94-HP-1802, DOH95-HP-1802, DOH96-HP-1702, and DOH99-HP-1702).
ie

35
36
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
w

37
38
39
Data Sharing Statement: No additional data available.
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
17
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 18 of 29

1
2
3 REFERENCES
4
5 1. Usher RH, Allen AC, MacLean FH. Risk of respiratory distress syndrome related to gestational
6
7
8 age, route of delivery and maternal diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;111:826–32.
9
10
11 2. Faxelius G, Hagnevik K, Lagercrantz H, et al. Catecholamine surge and lung function after
12
13
14 delivery. Arch Dis Child 1983;58:262–6.
15
Fo
16
17 3. Otamiri G, Berg G, Ledin T, Leijon I, et al. Influence of elective Cesarean section and breech
18
19
rp
20 delivery on neonatal neurological condition. Early Hum Dev 1990;23:53–64.
21
22
23 4. Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota
ee

24
25
26 in early infancy. Pediatrics 2006;118:511–21.
27
rr

28
29 5. Kapellou O. Effect of Cesarean section on brain maturation. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1416–22.
30
ev

31
6. Kostovic I, Jovanov-Milosevic N. The development of cerebral connections during the first
32
33
34
ie

20-45 weeeks gestation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;11:415–22.


35
36
w

37 7. Juarez I, Gratton A, Flores G. Ontogeny of altered dendritic morphology in the rat prefrontal
38
39
40 cortex, hippocampus, and nucleus accumbens following Cesarean delivery and birth anoxia. J
on

41
42
43 Comp Neurol 2008;507:1734–47.
44
ly

45
46 8. Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, et al. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by
47
48
49 different methods of delivery: Permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J
50
51
52 Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28:19–25.
53
54
55 9. Thavagnanam S, Flemmig J, Bromley A, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between
56
57
58 Cesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2008;38:629–33.
59
18
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 19 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 10. Ajslev TA, Andersen CS, Gamborg M, et al. Children overweight after establishment of gut
5
6
7 microbiota: the role of delivery mode, pre-pregnancy weight and early administration of
8
9
10 antibiotics. Int J Obes 2011;35:522–29.
11
12
13 11. Huh SY, Rifas-Shiman SL, Zera CA, et al. Delivery by caesarean section and risk of obesity in
14
15
preschool age children: a prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:610–6.
Fo
16
17
18
12. Kolokotroni O, Middleton N, Lamnisos D, et al. Asthma and atopy in children born by Cesarean
19
rp
20
21 section: effect modification based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:179–88.
22
23
ee

24 13. Cho CE and Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the
25
26
27 offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:249–54.
rr

28
29
30 14. Tollanes M, Moster D, Daltveit AK, et al. Cesarean section and risk of severe childhood asthma:
ev

31
32
33 a population-based cohort study. J Pediatr 2008;153:112–6.
34
ie

35
36 15. Maitra A, Sherriff A, Strachan D, et al. Mode of delivery is not associated with asthma or atopy
w

37
38
39 in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:1349–55.
40
on

41
42 16. Juhn YJ, Weaver A, Katusic S, et al. Mode of delivery at birth and development of asthma: a
43
44
ly

45
population-based cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:510–6.
46
47
17. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of Cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a
48
49
50 systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2013;37:893–9.
51
52
53 18. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 overview: The future manual.
54
55
56 http://www.dsm5.org/about/Pages/DSMVOverview.aspx (accessed 8 April 2016).
57
58
59
19
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 20 of 29

1
2
3
4 19. MacKay DF, Smith GC, Dobbie R, et al. Gestational age at delivery and special education need:
5
6
7 retrospective cohort study of 407,503 school children. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000289.
8
9
10 20. Kapellou O, Counsell SJ, Kennea N, et al. Abnormal cortical development after premature birth
11
12
13 shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth. PLoS Med 2006;3:e265.
14
15
21. Woythaler MA, McCormick MC, Smith VC. Late preterm infants have worse 24-month
Fo
16
17
18
neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants. Pediatrics 2011;127:e622–9.
19
rp
20
21 22. Sonnenschein-van der Voort AM, Arends LR, de Jongste JC, et al. Preterm birth, infant weight
22
23
ee

24 gain, and childhood asthma risk: a meta-analysis of 147,000 European children, J Allergy Clin
25
26
27 Immunol 2014;133:1317–29.
rr

28
29
30 23. Polyak A, Rosenfeld JA, Girirajan S. An assessment of sex bias in neurodevelopmental disorders.
ev

31
32
33 Genome Med 2015 27;7:94.
34
ie

35
36 24. Sealey LA, Hughes BW, Pestaner JP, et al. Environmental factors may contribute to autism
w

37
38
39 development and male bias: Effects of fragrances on developing neurons. Environ Res 2015;
40
on

41
42 142:731–8.
43
44
ly

45
25. Lampi KM, Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki S, Lehti V, et al. Parental age and risk of autism spectrum
46
47
disorders in a Finnish national birth cohort. J Autism Dev Disord 2013;43:2526–35.
48
49
50 26. Tearne JE, Robinson M, Jacoby P, et al. Does late childbearing increase the risk for behavioural
51
52
53 problems in children? A longitudinal cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29:41–9.
54
55
56 27. Rai D, Lewis G, Lundberg M, et al. Parental socioeconomic status and risk of offspring autism
57
58
59
20
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 21 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 spectrum disorders in a Swedish population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
5
6
7 2012;51:467–76.e6.
8
9
10 28. Martel MM. Individual differences in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and
11
12
13 associated executive dysfunction and traits: sex, ethnicity, and family income. Am J
14
15
Orthopsychiatry 2013;83:165–75.
Fo
16
17
18
29. Russell G, Ford T, Rosenberg R, et al. The association of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
19
rp
20
21 with socioeconomic disadvantage: alternative explanations and evidence, J Child Psychol
22
23
ee

24 Psychiatry 2014;55:436–45.
25
26
27 30. Xu R, DeMauro SB, Feng R. The impact of parental history on children's risk of asthma: a study
rr

28
29
30 based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III. J Asthma Allergy
ev

31
32
33 2015;8:51–61.
34
ie

35
36 31. Debley JS, Smith JM, Redding GJ, et al. Childhood asthma hospitalization risk after Cesarean
w

37
38
39 delivery in former term and premature infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005;94:228–33.
40
on

41
42 32. Mersha TB, Martin LJ, Myers JMB, et al. Genomic architecture of asthma differs by sex.
43
44
ly

45
Genomics 2015;106:15–22.
46
47
33. Kragh M, Larsen JM, Thysen AH, et al. Divergent response profile in activated cord blood T
48
49
50 cells from first-born child implies birth-order-associated in utero immune programming. Allergy
51
52
53 2016;71:323–32.
54
55
56 34. Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist AS, et al. Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic
57
58
59
21
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 22 of 29

1
2
3
4 disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 2005;35:1466–72.
5
6
7 35. Hermann C, Olivarius NDF, Høst A, et al. Prevalence, severity and determinants of asthma in
8
9
10 Danish five-year-olds. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:1182–90.
11
12
13 36. Pei Z, Heinrich J, Fuertes E, Flexeder C, et al. Cesarean delivery and risk of childhood obesity. J
14
15
Pediatr 2014;164:1068–73.
Fo
16
17
18
37. Matthiessen J, Stockmarr A, Fagt S, et al. Danish children born to parents with lower levels of
19
rp
20
21 education are more likely to become overweight. Acta pdiatr 2014;103:1083–8.
22
23
ee

24 38. Fradkin C, Wallander JL, Elliott MN, et al. Associations between socioeconomic status and
25
26
27 obesity in diverse, young adolescents: variation across race/ethnicity and gender. Health Psychol
rr

28
29
30 2015; 34:1–9.
ev

31
32
33 39. Lau et al., 2014 Lau EY, Liu J, Archer E, et al. Maternal weight gain in pregnancy and risk of
34
ie

35
36 obesity among offspring: a systematic review. J Obes 2014;2014:524939.
w

37
38
39 40. Li H, Ye R, Pei L, et al. Caesarean delivery, caesarean delivery on maternal request and
40
on

41
42 childhood overweight: a Chinese birth cohort study of 181 380 children. Pediatr Obes
43
44
ly

45
2014;9:10–6.
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
22
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 23 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 1. Characteristics of cohort members by child health at 5 years (sample 19,721)
4
5 Total, n (%) Vaginal delivery, Cesarean delivery,
6 n (%) n (%)
7 ** **
8 Neurodevelopmental disorders 804 (4.1) 497 (3.8) 307 (4.7)
9 Learning disabilities 290 (1.5) 179 (1.4) 111 (1.7)
10 ** **
Developmental delay 525 (2.7) 322 (2.5) 203 (3.1)
11
12 ADHD 183 (0.9) 112 (0.9) 71 (1.1)
13 147 (1.1) **
107 (1.6) **
Sensory integration disorder 254 (1.3)
14
15 Autism 88 (0.4) 52 (0.4) 36 (0.5)
Fo
16 Asthma 1311 (6.7) 831 (6.3)

478 (7.3)

17 *** ***
18 Obesity 2012 (14.7) 1269 (13.9) 737 (16.2)
19 Gender
rp
20 *** ***
21 male 10358 (52.6) 6785 (51.6) 3561 (54.3)
22 Birth order
23 *** ***
first-born child 9918 (50.4) 6833 (52.0) 3085 (47.1)
ee

24
***
25 Gestational age
26
<37 weeks 1644 (8.3) 784 (6.0) 857 (13.1)
27
rr

28 37 weeks 2557 (13.0) 1348 (10.3) 1206 (18.4)


29 38 weeks 5282 (26.8) 3124 (23.8) 2152 (32.8)
30
ev

31 39 weeks 5601 (28.4) 4250 (32.3) 1343 (20.5)


32 40-41weeks 4580 (23.2) 3603 (27.4) 975 (14.9)
33
34 ≧42 weeks 57 (0.3) 34 (0.3) 23 (0.4)
ie

***
35 Mother's age at birth of child
36
<25 years 2882 (14.6) 2288 (17.4) 591 (9.0)
w

37
38 25-29 years 6401 (32.5) 4514 (34.3) 1880 (28.7)
39
40
30-34 years 7032 (35.7) 4522 (34.4) 2503 (38.2)
on

41 >=35 years 3406 (17.3) 1819 (13.8) 1582 (24.1)


42 ***
Mother's education level
43
44 Compulsory school 2846 (14.5) 2061 (15.7) 780 (11.9)
ly

45 Senior high school 7908 (40.2) 5147 (39.2) 2756 (42.1)


46
47 Junior college 4959 (25.2) 3277 (25.0) 1675 (25.6)
48 College and above 3974 (20.2) 2636 (20.1) 1333 (20.4)
49 ***
50 Family monthly income
51 <30,000 2745 (14.1) 1860 (14.3) 881 (13.5)
52
53 30,000-100,000 13729 (70.3) 9211 (70.8) 4502 (69.2)
54 >100,000 3065 (15.7) 1944 (14.9) 1119 (17.2)
55
56
Missing data in birth order: 0.2%, gestational age: 0.1%, mother’s age at birth of child:
57 0.1%, mother’s educational levels: 0.3%, and family monthly income: 1.0%
58
59
23
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 24 of 29

1
2
3 Number of mothers or main care-givers who completed the questions regarding the three
4
5 children’s health issues: neurodevelopmental disorders: 19,695, allergic diseases: 19,696,
6 and overweight/obesity: 13,653
7
8
Data of modes of delivery from birth registration
9 Chi square for analyzing differences of overweight/obesity, allergic diseases, neurodevelopmental
10
disorders, gender and birth order between vaginal and Cesarean delivery
11 * ** ***
12 p<0.05; p <0.01; p <0.001
13
14
15
Fo
16
17
18
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
24
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 25 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 2. Association between Cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s
4
5 neurodevelopmental disorders after controlling gestational age, children’s and parental
6 characteristics
7
8 OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
9 Cesarean delivery 1.22 1.05-1.42 1.15 0.98-1.34
10
11
Gestational age (ref: 39-41 weeks)
12 <37 weeks 1.94 1.55-2.42
13
37 weeks 1.24 1.00-1.55
14
15 38 weeks 0.97 0.81-1.17
Fo
16 ≧42 weeks 1.63 0.58-4.59
17
18 Gender, male (ref: female) 2.16 1.85-2.52 2.13 1.83-2.49
19 First-born child (ref: not first-born child) 1.13 0.97-1.31 1.17 1.00-1.36
rp
20
21 Mother’s age at birth of child (ref: ≧35 years)
22 <25 years 0.75 0.58-0.98 0.76 0.58-1.00
23
25-29 years 0.79 0.64-0.98 0.81 0.65-0.99
ee

24
25 30-34 years 0.78 0.63-0.95 0.79 0.64-0.96
26
Mother’s education levels (ref: college or above)
27
rr

28 ≤ Compulsory school 1.09 0.82-1.44 1.07 0.81-1.41


29 Senior high school 0.97 0.78-1.22 0.97 0.77-1.21
30
ev

31 Junior college 0.96 0.76-1.21 0.96 0.76-1.21


32 Family monthly income (NTD) (ref: >100,000)
33
34 <30,000 2.23 1.66-3.00 2.23 1.66-3.00
ie

35 30,000-100,000 1.33 1.04-1.69 1.34 1.05-1.71


36
NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
w

37
38 Logistic regression was used for analysis
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
25
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 26 of 29

1
2
3 Table 3. Association between Cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s asthma after
4
5 controlling gestational age, children’s and parental characteristics
6 OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
7
8 Cesarean delivery 1.16 1.03-1.30 1.11 0.98-1.25 1.11 0.98-1.25
9 Gestational age (ref:
10
39-41 weeks)
11
12 <37 weeks 1.27 1.03-1.56 1.23 1.00-1.52
13
37 weeks 1.18 0.99-1.41 1.17 0.98-1.40
14
15 38 weeks 1.19 1.04-1.37 1.19 1.03-1.36
Fo
16 ≧42 weeks 1.98 0.84-4.65 2.05 0.87-4.84
17
18 Gender, male 1.40 1.25-1.57 1.39 1.24-1.56 1.40 1.24-1.57
19 First-born child 1.23 1.09-1.38 1.26 1.12-1.42 1.27 1.13-1.44
rp
20
21 Mother’s age at birth of
22 child (ref: ≧35 years)
23
<25 years 0.90 0.71-1.15 0.90 0.71-1.15 0.88 0.69-1.12
ee

24
25 25-29 years 1.14 0.95-1.36 1.14 0.96-1.36 1.13 0.94-1.34
26
30-34 years 1.03 0.88-1.22 1.04 0.88-1.23 1.02 0.87-1.21
27
rr

28 Mother’s education
29 levels (ref: college or
30
ev

31 above)
32 ≤ Compulsory school 0.67 0.53-0.85 0.67 0.53-0.85 0.68 0.54-0.86
33
34 Senior high school 0.72 0.61-0.85 0.72 0.61-0.85 0.72 0.61-0.86
ie

35 Junior college 0.81 0.69-0.95 0.81 0.69-0.95 0.81 0.69-0.96


36
Family monthly income
w

37
38 (NTD; ref: >100,000)
39
40
<30,000 0.67 0.52-0.86 0.66 0.52-0.85 0.67 0.53-0.86
on

41 30,000-100,000 0.87 0.74-1.02 0.87 0.74-1.02 0.88 0.75-1.04


42
Parental asthma history 3.62 2.88-4.55
43
44 (ref: no)
ly

45 NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD


46
47 Logistic regression was used for analysis
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
26
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 27 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 4. Association between Cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s obesity after
4
5 controlling gestational age, children’s and parental characteristics
6 OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
7
8 Cesarean delivery 1.19 1.08-1.32 1.19 1.07-1.32 1.16 1.05-1.29
9 Gestational age (ref:
10
39-41 weeks)
11
12 <37 weeks 1.07 0.89-1.28 1.09 0.91-1.31
13
37 weeks 0.97 0.83-1.13 0.98 0.84-1.14
14
15 38 weeks 0.97 0.86-1.09 0.96 0.85-1.08
Fo
16 ≧42 weeks 2.11 1.03-4.29 2.10 1.03-4.29
17
18 Gender, male (ref: 1.90 1.72-2.10 1.90 1.72-2.10 1.90 1.72-2.10
19 female)
rp
20
21 First-born child (ref: 1.17 1.05-1.29 1.16 1.05-1.29 1.14 1.03-1.26
22 not first-born child)
23
Mother’s age at birth
ee

24
25 of child (ref: ≧35 years)
26
<25 years 1.01 0.84-1.22 1.01 0.84-1.22 1.02 0.84-1.23
27
rr

28 25-29 years 1.01 0.87-1.17 1.01 0.87-1.17 1.02 0.88-1.19


29 30-34 years 0.88 0.77-1.02 0.88 0.77-1.02 0.89 0.77-1.02
30
ev

31 Mother’s education
32 levels (ref: college or
33
34 above)
ie

35 ≤ Compulsory school 1.45 1.19-1.78 1.45 1.19-1.77 1.47 1.20-1.80


36
Senior high school 1.48 1.26-1.72 1.48 1.27-1.73 1.48 1.27-1.73
w

37
38 Junior college 1.27 1.08-1.49 1.27 1.09-1.49 1.28 1.09-1.50
39
40
Family monthly
on

41 income (NTD) (ref:


42 >100,000)
43
44 <30,000 1.14 0.92-1.39 1.13 0.92-1.38 1.15 0.93-1.41
ly

45 30,000-100,000 1.11 0.95-1.29 1.11 0.95-1.29 1.11 0.95-1.29


46
47 Gestational diabetes 1.49 1.12-1.99
48 mellitus (ref: no)
49
50 Gestational weight 1.17 1.04-1.32
51 gain (ref: < 11 kg)
52
53 NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
54 Logistic regression was used for analysis
55
56
57
58
59
27
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 28 of 29

1
2 STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies
3
4
Item Reported
5
No Recommendation on page #
6
7 Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the 1-2
8 abstract
9 (b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was 2-3
10 done and what was found
11
12 Introduction
13 Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being 4-5
14 reported
15
Fo
Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses 5
16
17 Methods
18 Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper 5
19
rp
Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of 5-6
20
21 recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection
22 Participants 6 (a) Cohort study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of 5-6
23 selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up
ee

24 Case-control study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods
25
of case ascertainment and control selection. Give the rationale for the choice of
26
27 cases and controls
rr

28 Cross-sectional study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and


29 methods of selection of participants
30
(b) Cohort study—For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of 6
ev

31
32 exposed and unexposed
33 Case-control study—For matched studies, give matching criteria and the
34 number of controls per case
ie

35 Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and 6-8
36
effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable
w

37
38 Data sources/ 8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of 6-8
39 measurement assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if
40
on

there is more than one group


41
Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias 7
42
43 Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at 6
44 Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, 6-7
ly

45 describe which groupings were chosen and why


46
Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for 7-8
47
48 confounding
49 (b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions 7-8
50 (c) Explain how missing data were addressed 23-24
51 (d) Cohort study—If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed 5-6
52
53 Case-control study—If applicable, explain how matching of cases and controls
54 was addressed
55 Cross-sectional study—If applicable, describe analytical methods taking
56 account of sampling strategy
57
(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses NA
58
59 Continued on next page
60
1
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 29 of 29 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Results
4
Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers 8
5
6 potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in
7 the study, completing follow-up, and analysed
8 (b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage NA
9
(c) Consider use of a flow diagram NA
10
11 Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) 23-24
12 and information on exposures and potential confounders
13 (b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of 23-24
14 interest
15
Fo
16 (c) Cohort study—Summarise follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) NA
17 Outcome data 15* Cohort study—Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over NA
18 time
19 Case-control study—Report numbers in each exposure category, or summary 8-10
rp
20
measures of exposure
21
22 Cross-sectional study—Report numbers of outcome events or summary NA
23 measures
ee

24 Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted 25-27
25
estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval). Make clear which
26
27 confounders were adjusted for and why they were included
rr

28 (b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized 10


29 (c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk NA
30
for a meaningful time period
ev

31
32 Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and NA
33 sensitivity analyses
34
ie

Discussion
35
36 Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 11
w

37 Limitations 19 Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias 15
38 or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias
39 Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, 11-15
40
on

limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other


41
42 relevant evidence
43 Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 5-6
44
ly

Other information
45
46 Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study 17
47 and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based
48
49 *Give information separately for cases and controls in case-control studies and, if applicable, for exposed and
50
unexposed groups in cohort and cross-sectional studies.
51
52
53 Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and
54 published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely
55 available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at
56
http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is
57
58 available at www.strobe-statement.org.
59
60
2
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open

Associations of Cesarean Delivery and the Occurrence of


Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Asthma or Obesity in
Childhood Based on Taiwan Birth Cohort Study
Fo
Journal: BMJ Open

Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-017086.R1

Article Type: Research


rp

Date Submitted by the Author: 21-Jun-2017

Complete List of Authors: Chen, Ginden; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public
Health, National Taiwan University; Chung Shan Medical University
ee

Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology


Chiang, Wan-Lin ; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of
Public Health, National Taiwan University
Shu, Bih-Ching; National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine,
rr

Institute of Allied Health Sciences


Guo, Yueliang; National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Department
of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
Chiou, Shu-Ti; National Yang-Ming University,
ev

Chiang, Tung-liang; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of


Public Health, National Taiwan University

<b>Primary Subject
ie

Paediatrics
Heading</b>:

Secondary Subject Heading: Public health, Obstetrics and gynaecology


w

Cesarean delivery, neurodevelopmental disorders, Asthma < THORACIC


Keywords:
MEDICINE, obesity, vaginal delivery
on
ly

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml


Page 1 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Associations of Cesarean Delivery and the Occurrence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Asthma or
4
5 Obesity in Childhood Based on Taiwan Birth Cohort Study
6
7
8
9 Ginden Chen MD, PhD1,2,3, Wan-Lin Chiang PhD1, Bih-Ching Shu PhD4, Yueliang Guo MD, PhD5
10
Shu-Ti Chiou PhD6, Tung-liang Chiang ScD1
11
12
13 Affiliations:
14 1
15 Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University,
Fo
16 Taipei, Taiwan
17 2
18 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung,
19 Taiwan
rp
20 3
21 Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
4
22 Department of Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
23 5
Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU)
ee

24
25 College of Medicine and NTU Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
26 6
Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
27
rr

28
29 Address correspondence to:
30
ev

31 Tung-liang Chiang, Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National
32 Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei, 10055 Taiwan, [tlchiang@ntu.edu.tw],
33
34 886-2-33668059.
ie

35
36
Keywords: Cesarean delivery, neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, obesity, vaginal delivery
w

37
38
39
Abstract word count: 250
40
on

41 Text word count: 2,991


42 Tables: 4
43
44 Number of references: 41
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
1
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 2 of 30

1
2
3 ABSTRACT
4
5 Objectives Whether birth by cesarean section (CS) increases the occurrence of neurodevelopmental
6 disorders, asthma or obesity in childhood is controversial. We tried to demonstrate the association
7
8
between children born by CS and the occurrence of the above three diseases at the age of 5.5 years.
9
10
Methods The database of the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) which was designed to assess the
11
12 developmental trajectories of 24,200 children born in 2005 was used in this study. Associations
13 between children born by CS and these three diseases were evaluated before and after controlling for
14
15 gestational age (GA) at birth, children’s characteristics and disease-related predisposing factors.
Fo
16
17
18 Results Children born by CS had significant increases in neurodevelopmental disorders (20%),
19 asthma (14%), and obesity (18%) compared to children born by vaginal delivery. The association
rp
20
21 between neurodevelopmental disorders and CS was attenuated after controlling for GA at birth (OR:
22 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders steadily declined with
23
increasing GA up to ≤40-42 weeks. CS and childhood asthma were not significantly associated after
ee

24
25 controlling for parental history of asthma and GA at birth. Obesity in childhood remained
26 significantly associated with CS (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.24) after controlling for GA and
27
rr

28 disease-related factors.
29
30
ev

31 Conclusions Our results implied that the association between CS birth and children’s
32 neurodevelopmental disorders was significantly influenced by GA. CS birth was weakly associated
33
34 with childhood asthma since parental asthma and preterm births are stronger predisposing factors.
ie

35 The association between CS birth and childhood obesity was robust after controlling for
36
disease-related factors.
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
2
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 3 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
4
5  Our database simultaneously demonstrates whether neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and
6 obesity are associated with modes of delivery after controlling for potential confounding
7
8
factors.
9  We evaluated dose-dependent effects of gestational age on the occurrence of these diseases.
10
 Some information such as maternal/fetal conditions that indicate CS or precise indications of
11
12 CS that might be more related to these disorders were not evaluated because indications for CS
13 were derived from self-reports by mothers or reports by primary care-givers, not from medical
14
15 records.
Fo
16  We might have missed the possibility that these disorders might occur in combination because
17
18 we looked at associations among these three disorders and modes of delivery as mutually
19 exclusive.
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
3
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 4 of 30

1
2
3
4 INTRODUCTION
5
6
7 With an escalating rate of cesarean sections (CS) worldwide, literature has revealed that
8
9
10 cesarean delivery might delay neurological adaptation in infants and can also alter gut microbiotic
11
12
13 composition in early infancy. [1,2] Recent studies demonstrate that different delivery modes shape
14
15
the diversity in the human microbiome’s successional development in different body habitats and
Fo
16
17
18
might alter gut the microbiotic composition which might have associated effects on infant health.
19
rp
20
21 [3,4] However, whether modes of delivery also result in long-term physiological consequences in
22
23
ee

24 childhood or influence later physical well-being needs further investigation.


25
26
27 Kapellou pointed out that the delivery of infants before 39 weeks can not only increase
rr

28
29
30 respiratory morbidity, but may also interrupt intrauterine brain maturation and have a significant
ev

31
32
33 impact on future neurodevelopment.[5] Animal studies have shown that CS may affect development
34
ie

35
36 of neurons and that some fetal brain developmental processes continue into the neonatal period.[6,7]
w

37
38
39 In the past, mode of delivery has been shown to potentially affect normal intestinal colonization in
40
on

41
42 infants as demonstrated by checking fecal flora.[4] Collins et al. revealed that intestinal microbiota
43
44
ly

45
could communicate with the brain via the gut-brain axis to influence brain development and behavior.
46
47
[8] However, the correlation between CS and later neurodevelopmental disorders is still
48
49
50 controversial.
51
52
53 Overweight children and increase of allergic diseases have been reported to be associated with
54
55
56 CS delivery based on the hygiene hypothesis.[9-13] A meta-analysis demonstrated a 20% increase in
57
58
59
4
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 5 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 the subsequent risk of asthma in children who had been delivered by CS.[9] A population-based
5
6
7 cohort study found a moderately increased risk of asthma in the children delivered by CS and also
8
9
10 found that this association was stronger for preterm children than for term children.[14] However,
11
12
13 some longitudinal studies show no associations between subsequent risk of developing childhood
14
15
asthma, wheezing episodes or atopic dermatitis in infants delivered by CS after controlling for their
Fo
16
17
18
parental allergy history.[15,16] Epidemiological studies also revealed an association between CS and
19
rp
20
21 overweight or obese preschool age children.[10,11] Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis
22
23
ee

24 indicated that CS is only moderately associated with overweight and obese children.[17] The
25
26
27 inconsistent association between delivery modes and childhood allergies as well as
rr

28
29
30 overweight/obesity also needs clarification by further study.
ev

31
32
33 In this study, we used data from the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) to demonstrate whether
34
ie

35
36 neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and obesity at the age of 5.5 years are associated with modes
w

37
38
39 of delivery after controlling for potential confounding factors. Except for the basic demographic
40
on

41
42 factors of children and socioeconomic status of parents, the potential confounding factors also
43
44
ly

45
include specific factors that might be related to the occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders,
46
47
asthma, and obesity.
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
5
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 6 of 30

1
2
3
4 MATERIALS AND METHODS
5
6
7 Study population and setting
8
9
10 Data used in this study were derived from the TBCS. The TBCS has been designed to assess the
11
12
13 developmental trajectories of Taiwanese children and was financially sponsored by the Health
14
15
Promotion Administration in Taiwan. The study protocol and questionnaires were approved by the
Fo
16
17
18
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics in the Executive Yuan, according to the
19
rp
20
21 Statistics Act of Taiwan. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National
22
23
ee

24 Taiwan University Hospital (No. 201604055RINC).


25
26
27 By using two-stage stratified random sampling, the TBCS selected a nationally representative
rr

28
29
30 sample of 24,200 children born in 2005 from the National Birth Report Database, with a sampling
ev

31
32
33 rate of approximately 11.7%. Before children reached school age, face-to-face survey interviews
34
ie

35
36 with mothers or primary caregivers were conducted at 6 months, 18 months, 36 months, and 5.5
w

37
38
39 years of age, with response rates of 87.8%, 94.9%, 93.7%, and 92.8%, respectively. Our study
40
on

41
42 sample included 19,721 children who participated the first and fourth surveys. The content of both
43
44
ly

45
surveys contains questions about the child’s developmental, behavioral, and health outcomes, as well
46
47
as detailed information on family characteristics including socioeconomic conditions, parenting
48
49
50 practices, and the parents’ health and well-being.
51
52
53 Children’s health status, modes of delivery and gestational age
54
55
56 In this study, we focused on childhood obesity, asthma and neurodevelopmental disorders.
57
58
59
6
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 7 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 Childhood obesity was defined by the body mass index set by the Taiwan Bureau of Health
5
6
7 Promotion for preschool children. Children categorized with asthma were those who had been
8
9
10 diagnosed by a physician as described by Wen et al.[18] Learning disabilities, developmental delay,
11
12
13 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sensory integration disorder, and autism were diagnosed and
14
15
evaluated by pediatric psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. Children with neurodevelopmental
Fo
16
17
18
disorders were categorized as those having any or a combination of learning disabilities,
19
rp
20
21 developmental delay, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sensory integration disorder, or autism,
22
23
ee

24 according to the classification of the DSM-V published on May 27, 2013.[19]


25
26
27 Information about the mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean delivery) and gestational age (GA)
rr

28
29
30 was also collected from Taiwanese birth certificates in 2005. GA was stratified as: preterm (< 37
ev

31
32
33 weeks), term (37 to 41 weeks), and post-term (42 weeks or more). In order to evaluate the influence
34
ie

35
36 of GA on the associations of CS with the occurrence of the above three diseases, we further divided
w

37
38
39 term pregnancy into 37 weeks, 38 weeks, 39 weeks, and 40-41 weeks for comparison.
40
on

41
42 Parental characteristics used as control variables
43
44
ly

45
Mothers’ educational levels were classified as compulsory school (less than 9 years of
46
47
schooling), senior high school, junior college, college and above. Household monthly income was
48
49
50 categorized as less than 30,000 New Taiwan Dollars (NTD), 30,000-100,000 NTD, and more than
51
52
53 100,000 NTD (30 NTD≒1 USD). Gestational weight gain among the mothers was grouped as less
54
55
56 than 11 kilograms and 11 kilograms or more. The occurrence of gestational diabetes diagnosed
57
58
59
7
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 8 of 30

1
2
3
4 during prenatal care visits was also recorded. Parental history of asthma was recorded at the first
5
6
7 survey.
8
9
10 Statistical analysis
11
12
13 Children’s characteristics, obesity, asthma, and neurodevelopmental disorders were compared
14
15
with Chi-square tests. Logistic multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate obesity, asthma,
Fo
16
17
18
and neurodevelopmental disorders associated with CS after controlling for characteristics of children
19
rp
20
21 (i.e. GA, gender, birth order) and parents (i.e. mother’s age at birth of child, mother’s education
22
23
ee

24 levels, family monthly income). We also included disease-specific factors such as parental asthma
25
26
27 history for children’s asthma, gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational weight gain of mother for
rr

28
29
30 children’s obesity as controlling factors to demonstrate their effects on these disorders. The
ev

31
32
33 Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was used to check dose-dependent effects on the occurrence of these
34
ie

35
36 three diseases across the preterm, early term period of 37-40 weeks (GA at 37 weeks - <38 weeks, 38
w

37
38
39 weeks - <39weeks, 39 weeks - <40 weeks) and ≧40 weeks. Alpha level was set as 0.05. All
40
on

41
42 statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software package, SAS version 9.3.
43
44
ly

45
RESULTS
46
47
In total, data of 19,721 children (cohort cesarean rate: 33.2 %) were successfully collected:
48
49
50 neurodevelopmental disorders, 19,717, asthma, 19,720 and obesity, 19,269. The children’s and
51
52
53 parental characteristics are shown in Table 1. The prevalence of children’s neurodevelopmental
54
55
56 disorders, asthma and obesity were significantly different between birth by CS and vaginal delivery
57
58
59
8
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 9 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 (4.7% vs. 3.8%, 7.3% vs. 6.3%, 15.9% vs. 14.0%; respectively, all p < 0.05).
5
6
7 Association between Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Cesarean Delivery
8
9
10 Table 2 shows predisposing factors that might influence an association between
11
12
13 neurodevelopmental disorders and birth by CS. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)
14
15
for cesarean delivery were 1.22 and 1.05-1.42 after controlling for children’s and parental
Fo
16
17
18
characteristics. Gender was significantly associated with children’s neurodevelopmental disorders
19
rp
20
21 (OR for male: 2.16). A young maternal age at childbirth was found to be a protective factor against
22
23
ee

24 neurodevelopmental disorders in the children. Monthly household income had an inverse association
25
26
27 with the occurrence of children’s neurodevelopmental disorders.
rr

28
29
30 The association between neurodevelopmental disorders and birth by CS was attenuated after
ev

31
32
33 controlling for GA in a regression model (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Children born by CS at a
34
ie

35
36 GA of less than 38 weeks were significantly associated with more neurodevelopmental disorders
w

37
38
39 (GA less than 37 weeks: OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.55-2.42; GA at 37 weeks: OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.0-1.55;
40
on

41
42 All p <0.05)
43
44
ly

45
Association between Asthma and Cesarean Delivery
46
47
Table 3 shows that asthma was associated with birth by CS (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.30) after
48
49
50 controlling for children’s and parental characteristics. Gender and first-born children had a
51
52
53 significant association with childhood asthma (ORs for males and first-born child: 1.40 and 1.23). A
54
55
56 lower maternal educational level was a protective factor against childhood asthma. Children born in
57
58
59
9
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 10 of 30

1
2
3
4 families with a lower monthly income had fewer occurrences of asthma.
5
6
7 The association between asthma and children born by CS was attenuated after controlling for
8
9
10 GA (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.98-1.25). Children born at a GA of less than 37 weeks (OR: 1.27; 95% CI:
11
12
13 1.03-1.56) had a significant association with more asthma. CS and childhood asthma were not
14
15
significantly associated after further controlling parental history of asthma. However, children born
Fo
16
17
18
at a GA of less than 37 weeks and a mother’s educational level were still associated with more
19
rp
20
21 asthma. Parental history of asthma was more significantly associated with childhood asthma (OR:
22
23
ee

24 3.62; 95% CI: 2.88-4.55).


25
26
27 Association between Childhood Obesity and Cesarean Delivery
rr

28
29
30 Table 4 shows that childhood obesity was associated with birth by CS (OR: 1.15; 95% CI:
ev

31
32
33 1.06-1.26) after controlling for children’s and parental characteristics. Gender, first-born children and
34
ie

35
36 lower maternal education level were predisposing factors for childhood obesity. We found that
w

37
38
39 obesity in childhood remained significantly associated with cesarean delivery (OR: 1.15; 95% CI:
40
on

41
42 1.05-1.25) after controlling for GA. Children born post-term had a significant association with
43
44
ly

45
childhood obesity. Male gender, first-born child and lower maternal educational level were also
46
47
associated with obesity in childhood. Furthermore, birth by CS and childhood obesity were still
48
49
50 associated when we included gestational diabetes (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20-1.95) and maternal
51
52
53 gestational weight gain (≧ 11kg; OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07-1.30) as control variables.
54
55
56 Dose Effect of GA on These Three Disorders
57
58
59
10
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 11 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 Further, we found that there was an association between CS at a GA of less than 37 weeks and
5
6
7 neurodevelopmental disorders with a dose effect of GA until term. The association of premature birth
8
9
10 and neurodevelopmental disorders also existed in the regression analysis while excluding the
11
12
13 children born by primary CS due to mandatory medical factors. The risk of occurrence of
14
15
neurodevelopmental disorders steadily declined with increasing GA up to 39 - <42 weeks (data not
Fo
16
17
18
shown). However, there was no dose effect of the GA until term on childhood asthma and obesity.
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
11
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 12 of 30

1
2
3
4 DISCUSSION
5
6
7 In this study, children born by CS had significant increases in neurodevelopmental disorders
8
9
10 (20%), asthma (14%), and obesity (18%) compared to children born by vaginal delivery. However,
11
12
13 except for obesity, associations between CS births and children’s neurodevelopmental disorders or
14
15
asthma were attenuated after controlling for GA and potential disease-related predisposing factors.
Fo
16
17
18
Effect of GA on These Three Disorders
19
rp
20
21 Our results are consistent with the findings of MacKay et al.[20] We found that the risk of
22
23
ee

24 occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders was significantly associated with a GA of less than 37


25
26
27 weeks and steadily declined with increasing GA up to ≤40 - <42 weeks and with a dose effect of the
rr

28
29
30 gestation until term. These results support the hypothesis proposed by Kapellou which implies that
ev

31
32
33 the fetal brain develops and matures toward the end of gestation.[4] Our results also seem to
34
ie

35
36 indirectly provide data to support that neurodevelopmental outcomes are affected by premature
w

37
38
39 interruption of intrauterine life.[21,22]
40
on

41
42 Literature has revealed that preterm births, a younger GA at birth and low birth weight are
43
44
ly

45
associated with childhood asthma.[14,23] Tollanes et al. reported that an association between birth
46
47
by CS and increased risk of asthma was stronger for preterm children than for term children.
48
49
50 Sonnenschein-van der Voort et al.[23] further found that “the association of lower birth weight with
51
52
53 childhood asthma was largely explained by younger gestational age at birth”. Our results revealed
54
55
56 that the association between GA at birth and children’s asthma was attenuated after further
57
58
59
12
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 13 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 controlling for parental history of asthma.
5
6
7 Our results also showed that there were no associations between preterm, late-preterm, or term
8
9
10 at birth and childhood obesity. But childhood obesity was significantly associated with children born
11
12
13 post-term before and after controlling for gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational weight gain.
14
15
Association between Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Cesarean Delivery
Fo
16
17
18
Our results do not support the association between CS and neurodevelopmental disorders in
19
rp
20
21 childhood after controlling for GA. GA at birth, especially preterm births, significantly influenced
22
23
ee

24 the association between CS births and neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood. This phenomenon
25
26
27 is consistent with the viewpoint of Kapellou et al.[21] and Woythaler et al.[22]
rr

28
29
30 In addition to GA at birth, we also found that neurodevelopmental disorders occurred more in
ev

31
32
33 boys than in girls. However, recent literature has revealed that the increased risk of
34
ie

35
36 neurodevelopmental disorders in boys cannot exclude sex bias.[24,25] In this study, children with
w

37
38
39 neurodevelopmental disorders were diagnosed and evaluated by pediatric psychiatrists and clinical
40
on

41
42 psychologists, which might help to avoid the male bias.
43
44
ly

45
Associations between maternal age and neurodevelopmental disorders in longitudinal or cohort
46
47
studies are controversial.[26,27] Our study showed that a young maternal age at childbirth is a
48
49
50 protective factor. Literature has shown that parental socioeconomic status such as low familial
51
52
53 income is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.[28-30] We found that
54
55
56 children who have a higher familial income have less risk for the occurrence of children’s
57
58
59
13
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 14 of 30

1
2
3
4 neurodevelopmental disorders compared to children with a lower familial income.
5
6
7 Association between Asthma and Cesarean Delivery
8
9
10 A study in the UK in 2004 showed that an adjusted OR of delivery by CS is not associated with
11
12
13 the subsequent development of physician-diagnosed asthma, wheezing or atopy in later childhood.
14
15
[15] Another population-based cohort study conducted by Juhn et al. in the USA also revealed that
Fo
16
17
18
mode of delivery is not associated with subsequent risk of developing childhood asthma or wheezing
19
rp
20
21 episodes after calculating their cumulative incidence rate and adjusting hazard ratios.[16] In this
22
23
ee

24 study, children’s asthma was not significantly associated with CS births after further controlling for
25
26
27 GA and parental history of asthma.
rr

28
29
30 Kolokotroni et al. reported that children with a family history of allergies enhance the positive
ev

31
32
33 association between CS delivery and asthma outcomes.[12] Xu et al. revealed that maternal history
34
ie

35
36 of asthma (hazard ratio: 3.71) was strongly associated with offspring asthma.[31] In this study,
w

37
38
39 children born to a parent with a history of asthma was significantly associated with childhood asthma.
40
on

41
42 Our results concur with the findings of Delbley et al. They noted that in addition to the hygiene
43
44
ly

45
hypothesis, factors including genetics, intrauterine environment and premature birth might also
46
47
influence the association between birth by CS and childhood asthma.[32]
48
49
50 In this study, in addition to parental asthma history being significantly associated with child
51
52
53 asthma, boys and first-born children were also positively associated with the occurrence of childhood
54
55
56 asthma and maternal educational level was negatively associated with the occurrence of childhood
57
58
59
14
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 15 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 asthma. Mersha et al. showed that both genetic and gene expression data have sex-based differences
5
6
7 in the genomic association with asthma.[33] A significant association between first-born children and
8
9
10 childhood asthma might be consistent with the hypothesis of “in utero ‘birth-order’ T-cell
11
12
13 programming” postulated by Kragh et al. which does not support the hygiene hypothesis. Kragh et al.
14
15
revealed that first-born infants display a reduced anti-inflammatory profile in T cells at birth which
Fo
16
17
18
may contribute to later development of immune-mediated diseases by increasing overall immune
19
rp
20
21 reactivity in first-born children compared to younger siblings.[34] However, negative associations
22
23
ee

24 between maternal educational levels and childhood asthma are inconsistent with other studies.
25
26
27 Renz-Polster et al. did not find that maternal education levels influenced the occurrence of childhood
rr

28
29
30 asthma.[35] Hermann et al. reported that lower parental educational levels result in a higher
ev

31
32
33 prevalence of childhood asthma.[36]
34
ie

35
36 Association between Childhood Obesity and Cesarean Delivery
w

37
38
39 The association between CS births and childhood obesity was robust after including GA,
40
on

41
42 gestational diabetes and maternal gestational weight gain as potential predisposing factors. Our
43
44
ly

45
findings were consistent with the epidemiological study conducted by Huh et al.[11] and a systematic
46
47
review and meta-analysis by Li et al.[17] However, Pei et al. only found a greater likelihood of
48
49
50 obesity at the age of 2 years in their CS group, but not at the ages of 6 and 10 years in a prospective
51
52
53 cohort study in Germany which was inconsistent with our results.[37]
54
55
56 In addition, boys, first-born children and lower maternal educational levels were also
57
58
59
15
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 16 of 30

1
2
3
4 significantly associated with childhood obesity in the current study. Matthiessen et al. reported that
5
6
7 maternal educational level is inversely associated with childhood obesity, especially in boys.[38]
8
9
10 Fradkin et al. found that children growing up with a high socioeconomic status are associated with a
11
12
13 lower risk of childhood obesity, but with variations across race/ethnicity and gender.[39]
14
15
Literature reveals that children born to mothers with excessive gestational weight gain and
Fo
16
17
18
gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with a higher risk of childhood obesity.[40,41] Our
19
rp
20
21 results also showed that children born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus and higher
22
23
ee

24 gestational weight gain have a higher risk of childhood obesity.


25
26
27 Limitations of this study
rr

28
29
30 There are several limitations in this study. First, we did not evaluate relationships of childhood
ev

31
32
33 obesity and parental body mass index which is included in the TBCS. We used gestational weight
34
ie

35
36 gain as an associated factor instead of parental body mass index since parental body mass index may
w

37
38
39 be influenced by other lifestyle habits. Second, indications for CS in this study were derived from
40
on

41
42 self-reports by mothers or reports by primary care-givers, not from medical records. Some
43
44
ly

45
information such as maternal/fetal conditions that indicate CS or precise indications for CS that
46
47
might be more related to these disorders were not evaluated. Last, we looked at associations among
48
49
50 these three disorders and modes of delivery as mutually exclusive, but we might have missed the
51
52
53 possibility that these disorders might occur in combination.
54
55
56
57
58
59
16
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 17 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 CONCLUSIONS
5
6
7 Our results implied that CS birth was associated with the occurrence of children’s
8
9
10 neurodevelopmental disorders. However, children born before 38 weeks of GA by CS had
11
12
13 significantly more children’s neurodevelopmental disorders. CS birth was weakly associated with
14
15
childhood asthma since parental asthma and preterm labor are stronger predisposing factors. The
Fo
16
17
18
association between CS birth and childhood obesity is robust after controlling for related factors.
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
17
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 18 of 30

1
2
3 Acknowledgements We appreciate Dr. Jeng-Dau Tsai from the Department of Pediatrics and Dr.
4
5 Vincent Chin-Hung Chen from the Department of Psychiatry at Chung Shan Medical University
6 Hospital for kindly providing their expert opinion to help us interpret and classify our findings on
7
8
neurodevelopmental disorders. We thank all the children and their parents who participated in this
9 study, the interviewers who helped with data collection and all of the study groups who participated
10
in the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS).
11
12
13 Contributor’s statements:
14
15 Ginden Chen interpreted data, wrote drafts, revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript
Fo
16 as submitted.
17
18 Wan-Lin Chiang carried out the initial analyses, analyzed research data and approved the final
19 manuscript as submitted.
rp
20
21 Bih-Ching Shu, Yue-Liang Guo and Shu-Ti Chiou interpreted research data and approved the final
22 manuscript as submitted.
23
Tung-liang Chiang conceptualized and designed the study, revised the initial manuscript and
ee

24
25 approved the final manuscript as submitted.
26
27
rr

28 All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of
29 the work.
30
ev

31
32 Funding source: sponsored by the Health Promotion Administration, Department of Health and
33
34 Welfare in Taiwan (DOH94-HP-1802, DOH95-HP-1802, DOH96-HP-1702, and DOH99-HP-1702).
ie

35
36
Conflicts of Interest: none.
w

37
38
39
Data Sharing Statement: No additional data available.
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
18
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 19 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3 REFERENCES
4
5 1. Otamiri G, Berg G, Ledin T, et al. Delayed neurological adaptation in infants delivered by
6
7
8 elective cesarean section and the relation to catecholamine levels. Early Hum Dev 1991;26:51–
9
10
11 60.
12
13
14 2. Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota
15
Fo
16
17 in early infancy. Pediatrics 2006;118:511–21.
18
19
rp
20 3. Dominguez-Belloa MG, Costellob EK, Contrerasc M, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition
21
22
23 and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborn. Proc Natl Acad
ee

24
25
26 Sci U S A 2010;107:11971–5.
27
rr

28
29 4. Kapellou O. Effect of Cesarean section on brain maturation. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1416–22.
30
ev

31
5. Kostovic I, Jovanov-Milosevic N. The development of cerebral connections during the first
32
33
34
ie

20-45 weeks’ gestation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;11:415–22.


35
36
w

37 6. Juarez I, Gratton A, Flores G. Ontogeny of altered dendritic morphology in the rat prefrontal
38
39
40 cortex, hippocampus, and nucleus accumbens following Cesarean delivery and birth anoxia. J
on

41
42
43 Comp Neurol 2008;507:1734–47.
44
ly

45
46 7. Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, et al. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by
47
48
49 different methods of delivery: Permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J
50
51
52 Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28:19–25.
53
54
55 8. Collins SM, Surette M, Bercik P. The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain.
56
57
58 Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:735–42.
59
19
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 20 of 30

1
2
3
4 9. Thavagnanam S, Flemmig J, Bromley A, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between
5
6
7 Cesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2008;38:629–33.
8
9
10 10. Ajslev TA, Andersen CS, Gamborg M, et al. Children overweight after establishment of gut
11
12
13 microbiota: the role of delivery mode, pre-pregnancy weight and early administration of
14
15
antibiotics. Int J Obes 2011;35:522–29.
Fo
16
17
18
11. Huh SY, Rifas-Shiman SL, Zera CA, et al. Delivery by caesarean section and risk of obesity in
19
rp
20
21 preschool age children: a prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:610–6.
22
23
ee

24 12. Kolokotroni O, Middleton N, Lamnisos D, et al. Asthma and atopy in children born by Cesarean
25
26
27 section: effect modification based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:179–88.
rr

28
29
30 13. Cho CE and Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the
ev

31
32
33 offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:249–54.
34
ie

35
36 14. Tollanes M, Moster D, Daltveit AK, et al. Cesarean section and risk of severe childhood asthma:
w

37
38
39 a population-based cohort study. J Pediatr 2008;153:112–6.
40
on

41
42 15. Maitra A, Sherriff A, Strachan D, et al. Mode of delivery is not associated with asthma or atopy
43
44
ly

45
in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:1349–55.
46
47
16. Juhn YJ, Weaver A, Katusic S, et al. Mode of delivery at birth and development of asthma: a
48
49
50 population-based cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:510–6.
51
52
53 17. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of Cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a
54
55
56 systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2013;37:893–9.
57
58
59
20
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 21 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 18. Wen HJ, Chiang TL, Lin SJ, et al. Predicting risk for childhood asthma by pre-pregnancy,
5
6
7 perinatal, and postnatal factors. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015;26:272–9.
8
9
10 19. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 overview: The future manual.
11
12
13 http://www.dsm5.org/about/Pages/DSMVOverview.aspx (accessed 8 April 2016).
14
15
20. MacKay DF, Smith GC, Dobbie R, et al. Gestational age at delivery and special education need:
Fo
16
17
18
retrospective cohort study of 407,503 school children. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000289.
19
rp
20
21 21. Kapellou O, Counsell SJ, Kennea N, et al. Abnormal cortical development after premature birth
22
23
ee

24 shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth. PLoS Med 2006;3:e265.


25
26
27 22. Woythaler MA, McCormick MC, Smith VC. Late preterm infants have worse 24-month
rr

28
29
30 neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants. Pediatrics 2011;127:e622–9.
ev

31
32
33 23. Sonnenschein-van der Voort AM, Arends LR, de Jongste JC, et al. Preterm birth, infant weight
34
ie

35
36 gain, and childhood asthma risk: a meta-analysis of 147,000 European children, J Allergy Clin
w

37
38
39 Immunol 2014;133:1317–29.
40
on

41
42 24. Polyak A, Rosenfeld JA, Girirajan S. An assessment of sex bias in neurodevelopmental disorders.
43
44
ly

45
Genome Med 2015 27;7:94.
46
47
25. Sealey LA, Hughes BW, Pestaner JP, et al. Environmental factors may contribute to autism
48
49
50 development and male bias: Effects of fragrances on developing neurons. Environ Res 2015;
51
52
53 142:731–8.
54
55
56 26. Lampi KM, Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki S, Lehti V, et al. Parental age and risk of autism spectrum
57
58
59
21
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 22 of 30

1
2
3
4 disorders in a Finnish national birth cohort. J Autism Dev Disord 2013;43:2526–35.
5
6
7 27. Tearne JE, Robinson M, Jacoby P, et al. Does late childbearing increase the risk for behavioural
8
9
10 problems in children? A longitudinal cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29:41–9.
11
12
13 28. Rai D, Lewis G, Lundberg M, et al. Parental socioeconomic status and risk of offspring autism
14
15
spectrum disorders in a Swedish population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Fo
16
17
18
2012;51:467–76.e6.
19
rp
20
21 29. Martel MM. Individual differences in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and
22
23
ee

24 associated executive dysfunction and traits: sex, ethnicity, and family income. Am J
25
26
27 Orthopsychiatry 2013;83:165–75.
rr

28
29
30 30. Russell G, Ford T, Rosenberg R, et al. The association of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
ev

31
32
33 with socioeconomic disadvantage: alternative explanations and evidence, J Child Psychol
34
ie

35
36 Psychiatry 2014;55:436–45.
w

37
38
39 31. Xu R, DeMauro SB, Feng R. The impact of parental history on children's risk of asthma: a study
40
on

41
42 based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III. J Asthma Allergy
43
44
ly

45
2015;8:51–61.
46
47
32. Debley JS, Smith JM, Redding GJ, et al. Childhood asthma hospitalization risk after cesarean
48
49
50 delivery in former term and premature infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005;94:228–33.
51
52
53 33. Mersha TB, Martin LJ, Myers JMB, et al. Genomic architecture of asthma differs by sex.
54
55
56 Genomics 2015;106:15–22.
57
58
59
22
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 23 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 34. Kragh M, Larsen JM, Thysen AH, et al. Divergent response profile in activated cord blood T
5
6
7 cells from first-born child implies birth-order-associated in utero immune programming. Allergy
8
9
10 2016;71:323–32.
11
12
13 35. Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist AS, et al. Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic
14
15
disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 2005;35:1466–72.
Fo
16
17
18
36. Hermann C, Olivarius NDF, Høst A, et al. Prevalence, severity and determinants of asthma in
19
rp
20
21 Danish five-year-olds. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:1182–90.
22
23
ee

24 37. Pei Z, Heinrich J, Fuertes E, Flexeder C, et al. Cesarean delivery and risk of childhood obesity. J
25
26
27 Pediatr 2014;164:1068–73.
rr

28
29
30 38. Matthiessen J, Stockmarr A, Fagt S, et al. Danish children born to parents with lower levels of
ev

31
32
33 education are more likely to become overweight. Acta pdiatr 2014;103:1083–8.
34
ie

35
36 39. Fradkin C, Wallander JL, Elliott MN, et al. Associations between socioeconomic status and
w

37
38
39 obesity in diverse, young adolescents: variation across race/ethnicity and gender. Health Psychol
40
on

41
42 2015; 34:1–9.
43
44
ly

45
40. Lau et al., 2014 Lau EY, Liu J, Archer E, et al. Maternal weight gain in pregnancy and risk of
46
47
obesity among offspring: a systematic review. J Obes 2014;2014:524939.
48
49
50 41. Li H, Ye R, Pei L, et al. Caesarean delivery, caesarean delivery on maternal request and
51
52
53 childhood overweight: a Chinese birth cohort study of 181 380 children. Pediatr Obes
54
55
56 2014;9:10–6.
57
58
59
23
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 24 of 30

1
2
3 Table 1. Characteristics of cohort members by child health at 5 years (sample 19,721)
4
5 Total, n (%) Vaginal delivery, Cesarean delivery,
6 n (%) n (%)
7
8 Total 19721 (100.0) 13143 (66.6) 6556 (33.2)
9 Neurodevelopmental disorders 804 (4.1) 497 (3.8) 307 (4.7) **
10
11
Learning disabilities 290 (1.5) 179 (1.4) 111 (1.7)
12 Developmental delay 525 (2.7) 322 (2.5) 203 (3.1) **
13
ADHD 183 (0.9) 112 (0.9) 71 (1.1)
14
15 Sensory integration disorder 254 (1.3) 147 (1.1) 107 (1.6) **
Fo
16 Autism 88 (0.4) 52 (0.4) 36 (0.5)
17
18 Asthma 1311 (6.7) 831 (6.3) 478 (7.3) *
19 Obesity 2896 (14.7) 1844 (14.0) 1046 (15.9) ***
rp
20
21 Gender
22 male 10358 (52.6) 6785 (51.6) 3561 (54.3) ***
23
Birth order
ee

24
25 first-born child 9918 (50.4) 6833 (52.0) 3085 (47.1) ***
26
Gestational age, weeks ***
27
rr

28 <37 1644 (8.3) 784 (6.0) 857 (13.1)


29 37 2557 (13.0) 1348 (10.3) 1206 (18.4)
30
ev

31 38 5282 (26.8) 3124 (23.8) 2152 (32.8)


32 39 5601 (28.4) 4250 (32.3) 1343 (20.5)
33
34 40-41 4580 (23.2) 3603 (27.4) 975 (14.9)
ie

35 ≧42 57 (0.3) 34 (0.3) 23 (0.4)


36
Maternal age at birth of child, ***
w

37
38 years
39
40
<25 2882 (14.6) 2288 (17.4) 591 (9.0)
on

41 25-29 6401 (32.5) 4514 (34.3) 1880 (28.7)


42
30-34 7032 (35.7) 4522 (34.4) 2503 (38.2)
43
44 ≧35 3406 (17.3) 1819 (13.8) 1582 (24.1)
ly

45 Maternal education level ***


46
47 Compulsory school 2846 (14.5) 2061 (15.7) 780 (11.9)
48 Senior high school 7908 (40.2) 5147 (39.2) 2756 (42.1)
49
50 Junior college 4959 (25.2) 3277 (25.0) 1675 (25.6)
51 College and above 3974 (20.2) 2636 (20.1) 1333 (20.4)
52
53 Family monthly income ***
54 <30,000 2745 (14.1) 1860 (14.3) 881 (13.5)
55
30,000-100,000 13729 (70.3) 9211 (70.8) 4502 (69.2)
56
57 >100,000 3065 (15.7) 1944 (14.9) 1119 (17.2)
58
59
24
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 25 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Parental asthma history 518 (2.6) 328 (2.5) 190 (2.9)
4
5 Gestational diabetes mellitus 435 (2.2) 200 (1.5) 234 (3.6) ***
6 Gestational weight gain, kg ***
7
8
< 11 4766 (24.4) 3309 (25.4) 1449 (22.3)
9 11-13 4697 (24.0) 3306 (25.4) 1385 (21.3)
10
14-16 4631 (23.7) 3138 (24.1) 1491 (22.9)
11
12 ≧17 5448 (27.9) 3272 (25.1) 2171 (33.4)
13 Missing data in modes of delivery: 0.2%, birth order: 0.2%, gestational age: 0.1%,
14
15 maternal age at birth of child: 0.1%, maternal educational levels: 0.3%, and family
Fo
16 monthly income: 1.0%, parental asthma history: 0.5%, gestational diabetes mellitus:
17
18 0.2%, gestational weight gain: 0.9%
19 Number of mothers or main care-givers who completed the questions regarding the three
rp
20
21 children’s health issues: neurodevelopmental disorders: 19,717, asthma: 19,720, and
22 obesity: 19,269
23
Data of modes of delivery from birth registration
ee

24
25 Chi square for analyzing differences of obesity, asthma, neurodevelopmental disorders, gender and
26
birth order between vaginal and cesarean delivery
27
rr


28 p<0.05; ** p <0.01; *** p <0.001
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
25
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 26 of 30

1
2
3 Table 2. Association between cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s
4
5 neurodevelopmental disorders after controlling for gestational age, children’s and parental
6 characteristics
7
8 Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI
9 OR OR
10
11
Cesarean delivery 1.22 1.05-1.42 1.15 0.98-1.34
12 Gestational age (ref: 39-41 weeks)
13
<37 weeks 1.94 1.55-2.42
14
15 37 weeks 1.24 1.00-1.55
Fo
16 38 weeks 0.97 0.81-1.17
17
18 ≧42 weeks 1.63 0.58-4.59
19 Gender, male (ref: female) 2.16 1.85-2.52 2.13 1.83-2.49
rp
20
21 First-born child (ref: not first-born child) 1.13 0.97-1.31 1.17 1.00-1.36
22 Maternal age at birth of child (ref: ≧35 years)
23
<25 years 0.75 0.58-0.98 0.76 0.58-1.00
ee

24
25 25-29 years 0.79 0.64-0.98 0.81 0.65-0.99
26
30-34 years 0.78 0.63-0.95 0.79 0.64-0.96
27
rr

28 Maternal education levels (ref: college or above)


29 ≤ Compulsory school 1.09 0.82-1.44 1.07 0.81-1.41
30
ev

31 Senior high school 0.97 0.78-1.22 0.97 0.77-1.21


32 Junior college 0.96 0.76-1.21 0.96 0.76-1.21
33
34 Family monthly income (NTD) (ref: >100,000)
ie

35 <30,000 2.23 1.66-3.00 2.23 1.66-3.00


36
30,000-100,000 1.33 1.04-1.69 1.34 1.05-1.71
w

37
38 NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
39
40 Logistic regression was used for analysis
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
26
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 27 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 3. Association between cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s asthma after
4
5 controlling for gestational age, children’s and parental characteristics
6 Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI
7
8 OR OR OR
9 Cesarean delivery 1.16 1.03-1.30 1.11 0.98-1.25 1.11 0.98-1.25
10
11
Gestational age (ref:
12 39-41 weeks)
13
<37 weeks 1.27 1.03-1.56 1.23 1.00-1.52
14
15 37 weeks 1.18 0.99-1.41 1.17 0.98-1.40
Fo
16 38 weeks 1.19 1.04-1.37 1.19 1.03-1.36
17
18 ≧42 weeks 1.98 0.84-4.65 2.05 0.87-4.84
19 Gender, male 1.40 1.25-1.57 1.39 1.24-1.56 1.40 1.24-1.57
rp
20
21 First-born child 1.23 1.09-1.38 1.26 1.12-1.42 1.27 1.13-1.44
22 Maternal age at birth of
23
child (ref: ≧35 years)
ee

24
25 <25 years 0.90 0.71-1.15 0.90 0.71-1.15 0.88 0.69-1.12
26
25-29 years 1.14 0.95-1.36 1.14 0.96-1.36 1.13 0.94-1.34
27
rr

28 30-34 years 1.03 0.88-1.22 1.04 0.88-1.23 1.02 0.87-1.21


29 Maternal education
30
ev

31 levels (ref: college or


32 above)
33
34 ≤ Compulsory school 0.67 0.53-0.85 0.67 0.53-0.85 0.68 0.54-0.86
ie

35 Senior high school 0.72 0.61-0.85 0.72 0.61-0.85 0.72 0.61-0.86


36
Junior college 0.81 0.69-0.95 0.81 0.69-0.95 0.81 0.69-0.96
w

37
38 Family monthly income
39
40
(NTD; ref: >100,000)
on

41 <30,000 0.67 0.52-0.86 0.66 0.52-0.85 0.67 0.53-0.86


42
30,000-100,000 0.87 0.74-1.02 0.87 0.74-1.02 0.88 0.75-1.04
43
44 Parental asthma history 3.62 2.88-4.55
ly

45 (ref: no)
46
47 NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
48 Logistic regression was used for analysis
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
27
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 28 of 30

1
2
3 Table 4. Association between cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s obesity after
4
5 controlling for gestational age, children’s and parental characteristics
6 Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI
7
8 OR OR OR
9 Cesarean delivery 1.15 1.06-1.26 1.15 1.05-1.25 1.13 1.04-1.24
10
11
Gestational age (ref:
12 39-41 weeks)
13
<37 weeks 1.03 0.89-1.20 1.04 0.90-1.21
14
15 37 weeks 1.04 0.91-1.18 1.04 0.91-1.18
Fo
16 38 weeks 1.00 0.90-1.10 1.00 0.90-1.10
17
18 ≧42 weeks 2.28 1.26-4.13 2.29 1.26-4.15
19 Gender, male (ref:
rp
20 1.88 1.73-2.05 1.88 1.73-2.05 1.88 1.73-2.04
21 female)
22 First-born child (ref:
23 1.11 1.02-1.21 1.11 1.02-1.21 1.09 0.99-1.18
not first-born child)
ee

24
25 Maternal age at birth
26
of child (ref: ≧35 years)
27
rr

28 <25 years 0.97 0.83-1.14 0.97 0.83-1.14 1.00 0.85-1.16


29 25-29 years 0.99 0.87-1.12 0.99 0.87-1.12 1.00 0.88-1.13
30
ev

31 30-34 years 0.91 0.81-1.03 0.91 0.81-1.03 0.92 0.82-1.04


32 Maternal education
33
34 levels (ref: college or
ie

35 above)
36
≤ Compulsory school 1.70 1.44-2.00 1.69 1.43-2.00 1.71 1.45-2.02
w

37
38 Senior high school 1.60 1.40-1.83 1.60 1.40-1.83 1.60 1.40-1.83
39
40
Junior college 1.36 1.19-1.56 1.36 1.19-1.55 1.35 1.18-1.55
on

41 Family monthly
42
income (NTD) (ref:
43
44 >100,000)
ly

45 <30,000 1.04 0.88-1.24 1.04 0.87-1.23 1.05 0.89-1.25


46
47 30,000-100,000 1.06 0.93-1.21 1.06 0.93-1.21 1.07 0.94-1.22
48 Gestational diabetes
49 1.53 1.20-1.95
50 mellitus (ref: no)
51 Gestational weight
52
53 gain (ref: < 11 kg)
54 ≧ 11kg 1.18 1.07-1.30
55
NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
56
57 Logistic regression was used for analysis
58
59
28
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 29 of 30 BMJ Open

1
2 STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies
3
4
Item Reported
5
No Recommendation on page #
6
7 Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the 1-2
8 abstract
9 (b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was 2-3
10 done and what was found
11
12 Introduction
13 Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being 4-5
14 reported
15
Fo
Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses 5
16
17 Methods
18 Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper 6
19
rp
Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of 6
20
21 recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection
22 Participants 6 (a) Cohort study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of 6
23 selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up
ee

24 Case-control study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods
25
of case ascertainment and control selection. Give the rationale for the choice of
26
27 cases and controls
rr

28 Cross-sectional study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and


29 methods of selection of participants
30
(b) Cohort study—For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of 6
ev

31
32 exposed and unexposed
33 Case-control study—For matched studies, give matching criteria and the
34 number of controls per case
ie

35 Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and 6-8
36
effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable
w

37
38 Data sources/ 8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of 6-8
39 measurement assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if
40
on

there is more than one group


41
Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias 6-8
42
43 Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at 6
44 Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, 6-8
ly

45 describe which groupings were chosen and why


46
Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for 7-8
47
48 confounding
49 (b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions 8
50 (c) Explain how missing data were addressed 24-25
51 (d) Cohort study—If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed 6
52
53 Case-control study—If applicable, explain how matching of cases and controls
54 was addressed
55 Cross-sectional study—If applicable, describe analytical methods taking
56 account of sampling strategy
57
(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses NA
58
59 Continued on next page
60
1
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 30 of 30

1
2
3 Results
4
Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers 8
5
6 potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in
7 the study, completing follow-up, and analysed
8 (b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage NA
9
(c) Consider use of a flow diagram NA
10
11 Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) 24-25
12 and information on exposures and potential confounders
13 (b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of 24-25
14 interest
15
Fo
16 (c) Cohort study—Summarise follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) NA
17 Outcome data 15* Cohort study—Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over 8-11
18 time
19 Case-control study—Report numbers in each exposure category, or summary NA
rp
20
measures of exposure
21
22 Cross-sectional study—Report numbers of outcome events or summary NA
23 measures
ee

24 Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted 26-28
25
estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval). Make clear which
26
27 confounders were adjusted for and why they were included
rr

28 (b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized 24-25
29 (c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk NA
30
for a meaningful time period
ev

31
32 Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and NA
33 sensitivity analyses
34
ie

Discussion
35
36 Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 12
w

37 Limitations 19 Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias 16
38 or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias
39 Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, 12-16
40
on

limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other


41
42 relevant evidence
43 Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 6
44
ly

Other information
45
46 Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study 18
47 and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based
48
49 *Give information separately for cases and controls in case-control studies and, if applicable, for exposed and
50
unexposed groups in cohort and cross-sectional studies.
51
52
53 Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and
54 published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely
55 available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at
56
http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is
57
58 available at www.strobe-statement.org.
59
60
2
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open

Associations of Cesarean Delivery and the Occurrence of


Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Asthma or Obesity in
Childhood Based on Taiwan Birth Cohort Study
Fo
Journal: BMJ Open

Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-017086.R2

Article Type: Research


rp

Date Submitted by the Author: 18-Aug-2017

Complete List of Authors: Chen, Ginden; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public
Health, National Taiwan University; Chung Shan Medical University
ee

Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology


Chiang, Wan-Lin ; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of
Public Health, National Taiwan University
Shu, Bih-Ching; National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine,
rr

Institute of Allied Health Sciences


Guo, Yueliang; National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Department
of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
Chiou, Shu-Ti; National Yang-Ming University,
ev

Chiang, Tung-liang; Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of


Public Health, National Taiwan University

<b>Primary Subject
ie

Paediatrics
Heading</b>:

Secondary Subject Heading: Public health, Obstetrics and gynaecology


w

Cesarean delivery, neurodevelopmental disorders, Asthma < THORACIC


Keywords:
MEDICINE, obesity, vaginal delivery
on
ly

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml


Page 1 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Associations of Cesarean Delivery and the Occurrence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Asthma or
4
5 Obesity in Childhood Based on Taiwan Birth Cohort Study
6
7
8
9 Ginden Chen MD, PhD1,2,3, Wan-Lin Chiang PhD1, Bih-Ching Shu PhD4, Yueliang Guo MD, PhD5
10
Shu-Ti Chiou PhD6, Tung-liang Chiang ScD1
11
12
13 Affiliations:
14 1
15 Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University,
Fo
16 Taipei, Taiwan
17 2
18 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung,
19 Taiwan
rp
20 3
21 Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
4
22 Department of Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
23 5
Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU)
ee

24
25 College of Medicine and NTU Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
26 6
Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
27
rr

28
29 Address correspondence to:
30
ev

31 Tung-liang Chiang, Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National
32 Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei, 10055 Taiwan, [tlchiang@ntu.edu.tw],
33
34 886-2-33668059.
ie

35
36
Keywords: Cesarean delivery, neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, obesity, vaginal delivery
w

37
38
39
Abstract word count: 250
40
on

41 Text word count: 3,085


42 Tables: 4
43
44 Number of references: 41
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
1
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 2 of 31

1
2
3 ABSTRACT
4
5 Objectives Whether birth by cesarean section (CS) increases the occurrence of neurodevelopmental
6 disorders, asthma or obesity in childhood is controversial. We tried to demonstrate the association
7
8
between children born by CS and the occurrence of the above three diseases at the age of 5.5 years.
9
10
Methods The database of the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) which was designed to assess the
11
12 developmental trajectories of 24,200 children born in 2005 was used in this study. Associations
13 between children born by CS and these three diseases were evaluated before and after controlling for
14
15 gestational age (GA) at birth, children’s characteristics and disease-related predisposing factors.
Fo
16
17
18 Results Children born by CS had significant increases in neurodevelopmental disorders (20%),
19 asthma (14%), and obesity (18%) compared to children born by vaginal delivery. The association
rp
20
21 between neurodevelopmental disorders and CS was attenuated after controlling for GA at birth (OR:
22 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders steadily declined with
23
increasing GA up to ≤40-42 weeks. CS and childhood asthma were not significantly associated after
ee

24
25 controlling for parental history of asthma and GA at birth. Obesity in childhood remained
26 significantly associated with CS (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.24) after controlling for GA and
27
rr

28 disease-related factors.
29
30
ev

31 Conclusions Our results implied that the association between CS birth and children’s
32 neurodevelopmental disorders was significantly influenced by GA. CS birth was weakly associated
33
34 with childhood asthma since parental asthma and preterm births are stronger predisposing factors.
ie

35 The association between CS birth and childhood obesity was robust after controlling for
36
disease-related factors.
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
2
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 3 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
4
5  Our database simultaneously demonstrates whether neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and
6 obesity are associated with modes of delivery after controlling for potential confounding
7
8
factors.
9  We evaluated dose-dependent effects of gestational age on the occurrence of these diseases.
10
 Some information such as maternal/fetal conditions that indicate CS or precise indications of
11
12 CS that might be more related to these disorders were not evaluated because indications for CS
13 were derived from self-reports by mothers or reports by primary care-givers, not from medical
14
15 records.
Fo
16  We might have missed the possibility that these disorders might occur in combination because
17
18 we looked at associations among these three disorders and modes of delivery as mutually
19 exclusive.
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
3
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 4 of 31

1
2
3
4 INTRODUCTION
5
6
7 With an escalating rate of cesarean sections (CS) worldwide, literature has revealed that
8
9
10 cesarean delivery might delay neurological adaptation in infants and can also alter gut microbiotic
11
12
13 composition in early infancy. [1,2] Recent studies demonstrate that different delivery modes shape
14
15
the diversity in the human microbiome’s successional development in different body habitats and
Fo
16
17
18
might alter gut the microbiotic composition which probably has associated effects on infant health.
19
rp
20
21 [3] However, whether modes of delivery also result in long-term physiological consequences in
22
23
ee

24 childhood or influence later physical well-being needs further investigation.


25
26
27 Kapellou pointed out that the delivery of infants before 39 weeks can not only increase
rr

28
29
30 respiratory morbidity, but may also interrupt intrauterine brain maturation and have a significant
ev

31
32
33 impact on future neurodevelopment.[4] Animal studies have shown that CS may affect development
34
ie

35
36 of neurons and that some fetal brain developmental processes continue into the neonatal period.[5,6]
w

37
38
39 In the past, mode of delivery has been shown to potentially affect normal intestinal colonization in
40
on

41
42 infants as demonstrated by checking fecal flora.[7] Collins et al. revealed that intestinal microbiota
43
44
ly

45
could communicate with the brain via the gut-brain axis to influence brain development and behavior.
46
47
[8] However, the correlation between CS and later neurodevelopmental disorders is still
48
49
50 controversial.
51
52
53 Overweight children and increase of allergic diseases have been reported to be associated with
54
55
56 CS delivery based on the hygiene hypothesis.[9-13] A meta-analysis demonstrated a 20% increase in
57
58
59
4
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 5 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 the subsequent risk of asthma in children who had been delivered by CS.[9] A population-based
5
6
7 cohort study found a moderately increased risk of asthma in the children delivered by CS and also
8
9
10 found that this association was stronger for preterm children than for term children.[14] However,
11
12
13 some longitudinal studies show no associations between subsequent risk of developing childhood
14
15
asthma, wheezing episodes or atopic dermatitis in infants delivered by CS after controlling for their
Fo
16
17
18
parental allergy history.[15,16] Epidemiological studies also revealed an association between CS and
19
rp
20
21 overweight or obese preschool age children.[10,11] Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis
22
23
ee

24 indicated that CS is only moderately associated with overweight and obese children.[17] The
25
26
27 inconsistent association between delivery modes and childhood allergies as well as
rr

28
29
30 overweight/obesity also needs clarification by further study.
ev

31
32
33 In this study, we used data from the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) to demonstrate whether
34
ie

35
36 neurodevelopmental disorders, asthma, and obesity at the age of 5.5 years are associated with modes
w

37
38
39 of delivery after controlling for potential confounding factors. Except for the basic demographic
40
on

41
42 factors of children and socioeconomic status of parents, the potential confounding factors also
43
44
ly

45
include specific factors that might be related to the occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders,
46
47
asthma, and obesity.
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
5
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 6 of 31

1
2
3
4 MATERIALS AND METHODS
5
6
7 Study population and setting
8
9
10 Data used in this study were derived from the TBCS. The TBCS has been designed to assess the
11
12
13 developmental trajectories of Taiwanese children and was financially sponsored by the Health
14
15
Promotion Administration in Taiwan. The study protocol and questionnaires were approved by the
Fo
16
17
18
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics in the Executive Yuan, according to the
19
rp
20
21 Statistics Act of Taiwan. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National
22
23
ee

24 Taiwan University Hospital (No. 201604055RINC).


25
26
27 By using two-stage stratified random sampling, the TBCS selected a nationally representative
rr

28
29
30 sample of 24,200 children born in 2005 from the National Birth Report Database, with a sampling
ev

31
32
33 rate of approximately 11.7%. Before children reached school age, face-to-face survey interviews
34
ie

35
36 with mothers or primary caregivers were conducted at 6 months, 18 months, 36 months, and 5.5
w

37
38
39 years of age, with response rates of 87.8%, 94.9%, 93.7%, and 92.8%, respectively. Our study
40
on

41
42 sample included 19,721 children who participated the first and fourth surveys. The content of both
43
44
ly

45
surveys contains questions about the child’s developmental, behavioral, and health outcomes, as well
46
47
as detailed information on family characteristics including socioeconomic conditions, parenting
48
49
50 practices, and the parents’ health and well-being.
51
52
53 Children’s health status, modes of delivery and gestational age
54
55
56 In this study, we focused on childhood obesity, asthma and neurodevelopmental disorders.
57
58
59
6
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 7 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 Childhood obesity was defined by the body mass index set by the Taiwan Bureau of Health
5
6
7 Promotion for preschool children. Children categorized with asthma were those who had been
8
9
10 diagnosed by a physician as described by Wen et al.[18] Learning disabilities, developmental delay,
11
12
13 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sensory integration disorder, and autism were diagnosed and
14
15
evaluated by pediatric psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. Children with neurodevelopmental
Fo
16
17
18
disorders were categorized as those having any or a combination of learning disabilities,
19
rp
20
21 developmental delay, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sensory integration disorder, or autism,
22
23
ee

24 according to the classification of the DSM-V published on May 27, 2013.[19]


25
26
27 Information about the mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean delivery) and gestational age (GA)
rr

28
29
30 was also collected from Taiwanese birth certificates in 2005. GA was stratified as: preterm (< 37
ev

31
32
33 weeks), term (37 to 41 weeks), and post-term (42 weeks or more). In order to evaluate the influence
34
ie

35
36 of GA on the associations of CS with the occurrence of the above three diseases, we further divided
w

37
38
39 term pregnancy into 37 weeks, 38 weeks, 39 weeks, and 40-41 weeks for comparison.
40
on

41
42 Parental characteristics used as control variables
43
44
ly

45
Mothers’ educational levels were classified as compulsory school (less than 9 years of
46
47
schooling), senior high school, junior college, college and above. Household monthly income was
48
49
50 categorized as less than 30,000 New Taiwan Dollars (NTD), 30,000-100,000 NTD, and more than
51
52
53 100,000 NTD (30 NTD≒1 USD). Gestational weight gain among the mothers was grouped as less
54
55
56 than 11 kilograms and 11 kilograms or more. The occurrence of gestational diabetes diagnosed
57
58
59
7
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 8 of 31

1
2
3
4 during prenatal care visits was also recorded. Parental history of asthma was recorded at the first
5
6
7 survey.
8
9
10 Statistical analysis
11
12
13 Children’s characteristics, obesity, asthma, and neurodevelopmental disorders were compared
14
15
with Chi-square tests. Logistic multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate obesity, asthma,
Fo
16
17
18
and neurodevelopmental disorders associated with CS after controlling for characteristics of children
19
rp
20
21 (i.e. GA, gender, birth order) and parents (i.e. mother’s age at birth of child, mother’s education
22
23
ee

24 levels, family monthly income). We also included disease-specific factors such as parental asthma
25
26
27 history for children’s asthma, gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational weight gain of mother for
rr

28
29
30 children’s obesity as controlling factors to demonstrate their effects on these disorders. The
ev

31
32
33 Cochran-Armitage Trend Test was used to check dose-dependent effects on the occurrence of these
34
ie

35
36 three diseases across the preterm, early term period of 37-40 weeks (GA at 37 weeks - <38 weeks, 38
w

37
38
39 weeks - <39weeks, 39 weeks - <40 weeks) and ≧40 weeks. Alpha level was set as 0.05. All
40
on

41
42 statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software package, SAS version 9.3.
43
44
ly

45
RESULTS
46
47
In total, data of 19,721 children (cohort cesarean rate: 33.2 %) were successfully collected:
48
49
50 neurodevelopmental disorders, 19,717, asthma, 19,720 and obesity, 19,269. The children’s and
51
52
53 parental characteristics are shown in Table 1. The prevalence of children’s neurodevelopmental
54
55
56 disorders, asthma and obesity were significantly different between birth by CS and vaginal delivery
57
58
59
8
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 9 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 (4.7% vs. 3.8%, 7.3% vs. 6.3%, 15.9% vs. 14.0%; respectively, all p < 0.05).
5
6
7 Association between Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Cesarean Delivery
8
9
10 Table 2 shows predisposing factors that might influence an association between
11
12
13 neurodevelopmental disorders and birth by CS. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)
14
15
for cesarean delivery were 1.22 and 1.05-1.42 after controlling for children’s and parental
Fo
16
17
18
characteristics. Gender was significantly associated with children’s neurodevelopmental disorders
19
rp
20
21 (OR for male: 2.16). A young maternal age at childbirth was found to be a protective factor against
22
23
ee

24 neurodevelopmental disorders in the children. Monthly household income had an inverse association
25
26
27 with the occurrence of children’s neurodevelopmental disorders.
rr

28
29
30 The association between neurodevelopmental disorders and birth by CS was attenuated after
ev

31
32
33 controlling for GA in a regression model (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Children born by CS at a
34
ie

35
36 GA of less than 38 weeks were significantly associated with more neurodevelopmental disorders
w

37
38
39 (GA less than 37 weeks: OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.55-2.42; GA at 37 weeks: OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.0-1.55;
40
on

41
42 All p <0.05)
43
44
ly

45
Association between Asthma and Cesarean Delivery
46
47
Table 3 shows that asthma was associated with birth by CS (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.30) after
48
49
50 controlling for children’s and parental characteristics. Gender and first-born children had a
51
52
53 significant association with childhood asthma (ORs for males and first-born child: 1.40 and 1.23). A
54
55
56 lower maternal educational level was a protective factor against childhood asthma. Children born in
57
58
59
9
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 10 of 31

1
2
3
4 families with a lower monthly income had fewer occurrences of asthma.
5
6
7 The association between asthma and children born by CS was attenuated after controlling for
8
9
10 GA (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.98-1.25). Children born at a GA of less than 37 weeks (OR: 1.27; 95% CI:
11
12
13 1.03-1.56) had a significant association with more asthma. CS and childhood asthma were not
14
15
significantly associated after further controlling parental history of asthma. However, children born
Fo
16
17
18
at a GA of less than 37 weeks, at 38 weeks, boys, first born children and mother’s educational level
19
rp
20
21 were still associated with more asthma. Parental history of asthma was more significantly associated
22
23
ee

24 with childhood asthma (OR: 3.62; 95% CI: 2.88-4.55).


25
26
27 Association between Childhood Obesity and Cesarean Delivery
rr

28
29
30 Table 4 shows that childhood obesity was associated with birth by CS (OR: 1.15; 95% CI:
ev

31
32
33 1.06-1.26) after controlling for children’s and parental characteristics. Gender, first-born children and
34
ie

35
36 lower maternal education level were predisposing factors for childhood obesity. We found that
w

37
38
39 obesity in childhood remained significantly associated with cesarean delivery (OR: 1.15; 95% CI:
40
on

41
42 1.05-1.25) after controlling for GA. Children born post-term had a significant association with
43
44
ly

45
childhood obesity. Male gender, first-born child and lower maternal educational level were also
46
47
associated with obesity in childhood. Furthermore, birth by CS and childhood obesity were still
48
49
50 associated when we included gestational diabetes (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20-1.95) and maternal
51
52
53 gestational weight gain (≧ 11kg; OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07-1.30) as control variables.
54
55
56 Dose Effect of GA on These Three Disorders
57
58
59
10
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 11 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 Further, we found that there was an association between CS at a GA of less than 37 weeks and
5
6
7 neurodevelopmental disorders with a dose effect of GA until term. The association of premature birth
8
9
10 and neurodevelopmental disorders also existed in the regression analysis while excluding the
11
12
13 children born by primary CS due to mandatory medical factors. The risk of occurrence of
14
15
neurodevelopmental disorders steadily declined with increasing GA up to 39 - <42 weeks (data not
Fo
16
17
18
shown). However, there was no dose effect of the GA until term on childhood asthma and obesity.
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
11
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 12 of 31

1
2
3
4 DISCUSSION
5
6
7 In this study, children born by CS had significant increases in neurodevelopmental disorders
8
9
10 (20%), asthma (14%), and obesity (18%) compared to children born by vaginal delivery. However,
11
12
13 except for obesity, associations between CS births and children’s neurodevelopmental disorders or
14
15
asthma were attenuated after controlling for GA and potential disease-related predisposing factors.
Fo
16
17
18
Effect of GA on These Three Disorders
19
rp
20
21 Our results are consistent with the findings of MacKay et al.[20] We found that the risk of
22
23
ee

24 occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders was significantly associated with a GA of less than 37


25
26
27 weeks and steadily declined with increasing GA up to ≤40 - <42 weeks and with a dose effect of the
rr

28
29
30 gestation until term. These results support the hypothesis proposed by Kapellou which implies that
ev

31
32
33 the fetal brain develops and matures toward the end of gestation.[4] Our results also seem to
34
ie

35
36 indirectly provide data to support that neurodevelopmental outcomes are affected by premature
w

37
38
39 interruption of intrauterine life.[21,22]
40
on

41
42 Literature has revealed that preterm births, a younger GA at birth and low birth weight are
43
44
ly

45
associated with childhood asthma.[14,23] Tollanes et al. reported that an association between birth
46
47
by CS and increased risk of asthma was stronger for preterm children than for term children.
48
49
50 Sonnenschein-van der Voort et al.[23] further found that “the association of lower birth weight with
51
52
53 childhood asthma was largely explained by younger gestational age at birth”. Our results revealed
54
55
56 that the association between GA at birth and children’s asthma was attenuated after further
57
58
59
12
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 13 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 controlling for parental history of asthma.
5
6
7 Our results also showed that there were no associations between preterm, late-preterm, or term
8
9
10 at birth and childhood obesity. But childhood obesity was significantly associated with children born
11
12
13 post-term before and after controlling for gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational weight gain.
14
15
Association between Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Cesarean Delivery
Fo
16
17
18
Our results do not support the association between CS and neurodevelopmental disorders in
19
rp
20
21 childhood after controlling for GA. GA at birth, especially preterm births, significantly influenced
22
23
ee

24 the association between CS births and neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood. This phenomenon
25
26
27 is consistent with the viewpoint of Kapellou et al.[21] and Woythaler et al.[22]
rr

28
29
30 In addition to GA at birth, we also found that neurodevelopmental disorders occurred more in
ev

31
32
33 boys than in girls. However, recent literature has revealed that the increased risk of
34
ie

35
36 neurodevelopmental disorders in boys cannot exclude sex bias.[24,25] In this study, children with
w

37
38
39 neurodevelopmental disorders were diagnosed and evaluated by pediatric psychiatrists and clinical
40
on

41
42 psychologists, which might help to avoid the male bias.
43
44
ly

45
Associations between maternal age and neurodevelopmental disorders in longitudinal or cohort
46
47
studies are controversial.[26,27] Our study showed that a young maternal age at childbirth is a
48
49
50 protective factor. Literature has shown that parental socioeconomic status such as low familial
51
52
53 income is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.[28-30] We found that
54
55
56 children who have a higher familial income have less risk for the occurrence of children’s
57
58
59
13
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 14 of 31

1
2
3
4 neurodevelopmental disorders compared to children with a lower familial income.
5
6
7 Association between Asthma and Cesarean Delivery
8
9
10 A study in the UK in 2004 showed that an adjusted OR of delivery by CS is not associated with
11
12
13 the subsequent development of physician-diagnosed asthma, wheezing or atopy in later childhood.
14
15
[15] Another population-based cohort study conducted by Juhn et al. in the USA also revealed that
Fo
16
17
18
mode of delivery is not associated with subsequent risk of developing childhood asthma or wheezing
19
rp
20
21 episodes after calculating their cumulative incidence rate and adjusting hazard ratios.[16] In this
22
23
ee

24 study, children’s asthma was not significantly associated with CS births after further controlling for
25
26
27 GA and parental history of asthma.
rr

28
29
30 Kolokotroni et al. reported that children with a family history of allergies enhance the positive
ev

31
32
33 association between CS delivery and asthma outcomes.[12] Xu et al. revealed that maternal history
34
ie

35
36 of asthma (hazard ratio: 3.71) was strongly associated with offspring asthma.[31] In our study,
w

37
38
39 children born to a parent with a history of asthma was significantly associated with childhood asthma.
40
on

41
42 However, Delbley et al. found that CS births are associated with subsequent asthma hospitalization
43
44
ly

45
only in premature and mothers with asthma have increased rates of CS and premature delivery. They
46
47
noted that in addition to the hygiene hypothesis, factors including genetics, intrauterine environment
48
49
50 and premature birth might also influence the association between birth by CS and childhood
51
52
53 asthma.[32]
54
55
56 In this study, in addition to parental asthma history being significantly associated with child
57
58
59
14
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 15 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 asthma, boys and first-born children were also positively associated with the occurrence of childhood
5
6
7 asthma and maternal educational level was negatively associated with the occurrence of childhood
8
9
10 asthma. Mersha et al. showed that both genetic and gene expression data have sex-based differences
11
12
13 in the genomic association with asthma.[33] A significant association between first-born children and
14
15
childhood asthma might be consistent with the hypothesis of “in utero ‘birth-order’ T-cell
Fo
16
17
18
programming” postulated by Kragh et al. which does not support the hygiene hypothesis. Kragh et al.
19
rp
20
21 revealed that first-born infants display a reduced anti-inflammatory profile in T cells at birth which
22
23
ee

24 may contribute to later development of immune-mediated diseases by increasing overall immune


25
26
27 reactivity in first-born children compared to younger siblings.[34] However, negative associations
rr

28
29
30 between maternal educational levels and childhood asthma are inconsistent with other studies.
ev

31
32
33 Renz-Polster et al. did not find that maternal education levels influenced the occurrence of childhood
34
ie

35
36 asthma.[35] Hermann et al. reported that lower parental educational levels result in a higher
w

37
38
39 prevalence of childhood asthma.[36]
40
on

41
42 Association between Childhood Obesity and Cesarean Delivery
43
44
ly

45
The association between CS births and childhood obesity was robust after including GA,
46
47
gestational diabetes and maternal gestational weight gain as potential predisposing factors. Our
48
49
50 findings were consistent with the epidemiological study conducted by Huh et al.[11] and a systematic
51
52
53 review and meta-analysis by Li et al.[17] However, Pei et al. only found a greater likelihood of
54
55
56 obesity at the age of 2 years in their CS group, but not at the ages of 6 and 10 years in a prospective
57
58
59
15
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 16 of 31

1
2
3
4 cohort study in Germany which was inconsistent with our results.[37]
5
6
7 In addition, boys, first-born children and lower maternal educational levels were also
8
9
10 significantly associated with childhood obesity in the current study. Matthiessen et al. reported that
11
12
13 maternal educational level is inversely associated with childhood obesity, especially in boys.[38]
14
15
Fradkin et al. found that children growing up with a high socioeconomic status are associated with a
Fo
16
17
18
lower risk of childhood obesity, but with variations across race/ethnicity and gender.[39]
19
rp
20
21 Literature reveals that children born to mothers with excessive gestational weight gain and
22
23
ee

24 gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with a higher risk of childhood obesity.[40,41] Our
25
26
27 results also showed that children born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus and higher
rr

28
29
30 gestational weight gain have a higher risk of childhood obesity.
ev

31
32
33 Limitations of this study
34
ie

35
36 There are several limitations in this study. First, we did not evaluate relationships of childhood
w

37
38
39 obesity and parental body mass index which is included in the TBCS. We used gestational weight
40
on

41
42 gain as an associated factor instead of parental body mass index since parental body mass index may
43
44
ly

45
be influenced by other lifestyle habits. Second, indications for CS in this study were derived from
46
47
self-reports by mothers or reports by primary care-givers, not from medical records. Some
48
49
50 information such as maternal/fetal conditions that indicate CS or precise indications for CS that
51
52
53 might be more related to these disorders were not evaluated. For example, whether there was a trial
54
55
56 of labor before CS was not available. The infant might have exposed to some of the flora, even in the
57
58
59
16
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 17 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 absence of vaginal delivery. Third, we looked at associations among these three disorders and modes
5
6
7 of delivery as mutually exclusive, but we might have missed the possibility that these disorders
8
9
10 might occur in combination. Last, any or in combination of learning disabilities, developmental delay,
11
12
13 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sensory integration disorder, or autism were categorized as
14
15
neurodevelopment disorders might distorted our outcomes because each of them may have different
Fo
16
17
18
underlying risk factors.
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
17
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 18 of 31

1
2
3
4 CONCLUSIONS
5
6
7 Our results implied that CS birth was associated with the occurrence of children’s
8
9
10 neurodevelopmental disorders. However, children born before 38 weeks of GA by CS had
11
12
13 significantly more children’s neurodevelopmental disorders. CS birth was weakly associated with
14
15
childhood asthma since parental asthma and preterm labor are stronger predisposing factors. The
Fo
16
17
18
association between CS birth and childhood obesity is robust after controlling for related factors.
19
rp
20
21
22
23
ee

24
25
26
27
rr

28
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
18
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 19 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Acknowledgements We appreciate Dr. Jeng-Dau Tsai from the Department of Pediatrics and Dr.
4
5 Vincent Chin-Hung Chen from the Department of Psychiatry at Chung Shan Medical University
6 Hospital for kindly providing their expert opinion to help us interpret and classify our findings on
7
8
neurodevelopmental disorders. We thank all the children and their parents who participated in this
9 study, the interviewers who helped with data collection and all of the study groups who participated
10
in the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS).
11
12
13 Contributor’s statements:
14
15 Ginden Chen interpreted data, wrote drafts, revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript
Fo
16 as submitted.
17
18 Wan-Lin Chiang carried out the initial analyses, analyzed research data and approved the final
19 manuscript as submitted.
rp
20
21 Bih-Ching Shu, Yue-Liang Guo and Shu-Ti Chiou interpreted research data and approved the final
22 manuscript as submitted.
23
Tung-liang Chiang conceptualized and designed the study, revised the initial manuscript and
ee

24
25 approved the final manuscript as submitted.
26
27
rr

28 All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of
29 the work.
30
ev

31
32 Funding source: sponsored by the Health Promotion Administration, Department of Health and
33
34 Welfare in Taiwan (DOH94-HP-1802, DOH95-HP-1802, DOH96-HP-1702, and DOH99-HP-1702).
ie

35
36
Conflicts of Interest: none.
w

37
38
39
Data Sharing Statement: No additional data available.
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
19
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 20 of 31

1
2
3 REFERENCES
4
5 1. Otamiri G, Berg G, Ledin T, et al. Delayed neurological adaptation in infants delivered by
6
7
8 elective cesarean section and the relation to catecholamine levels. Early Hum Dev 1991;26:51–
9
10
11 60.
12
13
14 2. Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota
15
Fo
16
17 in early infancy. Pediatrics 2006;118:511–21.
18
19
rp
20 3. Dominguez-Belloa MG, Costellob EK, Contrerasc M, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition
21
22
23 and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborn. Proc Natl Acad
ee

24
25
26 Sci U S A 2010;107:11971–5.
27
rr

28
29 4. Kapellou O. Effect of Cesarean section on brain maturation. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1416–22.
30
ev

31
5. Kostovic I, Jovanov-Milosevic N. The development of cerebral connections during the first
32
33
34
ie

20-45 weeks’ gestation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;11:415–22.


35
36
w

37 6. Juarez I, Gratton A, Flores G. Ontogeny of altered dendritic morphology in the rat prefrontal
38
39
40 cortex, hippocampus, and nucleus accumbens following Cesarean delivery and birth anoxia. J
on

41
42
43 Comp Neurol 2008;507:1734–47.
44
ly

45
46 7. Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, et al. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by
47
48
49 different methods of delivery: Permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J
50
51
52 Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28:19–25.
53
54
55 8. Collins SM, Surette M, Bercik P. The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain.
56
57
58 Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:735–42.
59
20
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 21 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 9. Thavagnanam S, Flemmig J, Bromley A, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between
5
6
7 Cesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2008;38:629–33.
8
9
10 10. Ajslev TA, Andersen CS, Gamborg M, et al. Children overweight after establishment of gut
11
12
13 microbiota: the role of delivery mode, pre-pregnancy weight and early administration of
14
15
antibiotics. Int J Obes 2011;35:522–29.
Fo
16
17
18
11. Huh SY, Rifas-Shiman SL, Zera CA, et al. Delivery by caesarean section and risk of obesity in
19
rp
20
21 preschool age children: a prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:610–6.
22
23
ee

24 12. Kolokotroni O, Middleton N, Lamnisos D, et al. Asthma and atopy in children born by Cesarean
25
26
27 section: effect modification based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:179–88.
rr

28
29
30 13. Cho CE and Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the
ev

31
32
33 offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:249–54.
34
ie

35
36 14. Tollanes M, Moster D, Daltveit AK, et al. Cesarean section and risk of severe childhood asthma:
w

37
38
39 a population-based cohort study. J Pediatr 2008;153:112–6.
40
on

41
42 15. Maitra A, Sherriff A, Strachan D, et al. Mode of delivery is not associated with asthma or atopy
43
44
ly

45
in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:1349–55.
46
47
16. Juhn YJ, Weaver A, Katusic S, et al. Mode of delivery at birth and development of asthma: a
48
49
50 population-based cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:510–6.
51
52
53 17. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of Cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a
54
55
56 systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2013;37:893–9.
57
58
59
21
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 22 of 31

1
2
3
4 18. Wen HJ, Chiang TL, Lin SJ, et al. Predicting risk for childhood asthma by pre-pregnancy,
5
6
7 perinatal, and postnatal factors. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015;26:272–9.
8
9
10 19. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 overview: The future manual.
11
12
13 http://www.dsm5.org/about/Pages/DSMVOverview.aspx (accessed 8 April 2016).
14
15
20. MacKay DF, Smith GC, Dobbie R, et al. Gestational age at delivery and special education need:
Fo
16
17
18
retrospective cohort study of 407,503 school children. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000289.
19
rp
20
21 21. Kapellou O, Counsell SJ, Kennea N, et al. Abnormal cortical development after premature birth
22
23
ee

24 shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth. PLoS Med 2006;3:e265.


25
26
27 22. Woythaler MA, McCormick MC, Smith VC. Late preterm infants have worse 24-month
rr

28
29
30 neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants. Pediatrics 2011;127:e622–9.
ev

31
32
33 23. Sonnenschein-van der Voort AM, Arends LR, de Jongste JC, et al. Preterm birth, infant weight
34
ie

35
36 gain, and childhood asthma risk: a meta-analysis of 147,000 European children, J Allergy Clin
w

37
38
39 Immunol 2014;133:1317–29.
40
on

41
42 24. Polyak A, Rosenfeld JA, Girirajan S. An assessment of sex bias in neurodevelopmental disorders.
43
44
ly

45
Genome Med 2015 27;7:94.
46
47
25. Sealey LA, Hughes BW, Pestaner JP, et al. Environmental factors may contribute to autism
48
49
50 development and male bias: Effects of fragrances on developing neurons. Environ Res 2015;
51
52
53 142:731–8.
54
55
56 26. Lampi KM, Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki S, Lehti V, et al. Parental age and risk of autism spectrum
57
58
59
22
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 23 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3
4 disorders in a Finnish national birth cohort. J Autism Dev Disord 2013;43:2526–35.
5
6
7 27. Tearne JE, Robinson M, Jacoby P, et al. Does late childbearing increase the risk for behavioural
8
9
10 problems in children? A longitudinal cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29:41–9.
11
12
13 28. Rai D, Lewis G, Lundberg M, et al. Parental socioeconomic status and risk of offspring autism
14
15
spectrum disorders in a Swedish population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Fo
16
17
18
2012;51:467–76.e6.
19
rp
20
21 29. Martel MM. Individual differences in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and
22
23
ee

24 associated executive dysfunction and traits: sex, ethnicity, and family income. Am J
25
26
27 Orthopsychiatry 2013;83:165–75.
rr

28
29
30 30. Russell G, Ford T, Rosenberg R, et al. The association of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
ev

31
32
33 with socioeconomic disadvantage: alternative explanations and evidence, J Child Psychol
34
ie

35
36 Psychiatry 2014;55:436–45.
w

37
38
39 31. Xu R, DeMauro SB, Feng R. The impact of parental history on children's risk of asthma: a study
40
on

41
42 based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III. J Asthma Allergy
43
44
ly

45
2015;8:51–61.
46
47
32. Debley JS, Smith JM, Redding GJ, et al. Childhood asthma hospitalization risk after cesarean
48
49
50 delivery in former term and premature infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005;94:228–33.
51
52
53 33. Mersha TB, Martin LJ, Myers JMB, et al. Genomic architecture of asthma differs by sex.
54
55
56 Genomics 2015;106:15–22.
57
58
59
23
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 24 of 31

1
2
3
4 34. Kragh M, Larsen JM, Thysen AH, et al. Divergent response profile in activated cord blood T
5
6
7 cells from first-born child implies birth-order-associated in utero immune programming. Allergy
8
9
10 2016;71:323–32.
11
12
13 35. Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist AS, et al. Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic
14
15
disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 2005;35:1466–72.
Fo
16
17
18
36. Hermann C, Olivarius NDF, Høst A, et al. Prevalence, severity and determinants of asthma in
19
rp
20
21 Danish five-year-olds. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:1182–90.
22
23
ee

24 37. Pei Z, Heinrich J, Fuertes E, Flexeder C, et al. Cesarean delivery and risk of childhood obesity. J
25
26
27 Pediatr 2014;164:1068–73.
rr

28
29
30 38. Matthiessen J, Stockmarr A, Fagt S, et al. Danish children born to parents with lower levels of
ev

31
32
33 education are more likely to become overweight. Acta pdiatr 2014;103:1083–8.
34
ie

35
36 39. Fradkin C, Wallander JL, Elliott MN, et al. Associations between socioeconomic status and
w

37
38
39 obesity in diverse, young adolescents: variation across race/ethnicity and gender. Health Psychol
40
on

41
42 2015; 34:1–9.
43
44
ly

45
40. Lau et al., 2014 Lau EY, Liu J, Archer E, et al. Maternal weight gain in pregnancy and risk of
46
47
obesity among offspring: a systematic review. J Obes 2014;2014:524939.
48
49
50 41. Li H, Ye R, Pei L, et al. Caesarean delivery, caesarean delivery on maternal request and
51
52
53 childhood overweight: a Chinese birth cohort study of 181 380 children. Pediatr Obes
54
55
56 2014;9:10–6.
57
58
59
24
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 25 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 1. Characteristics of cohort members by child health at 5 years (sample 19,721)
4
5 Total, n (%) Vaginal delivery, Cesarean delivery,
6 n (%) n (%)
7
8 Total 19721 (100.0) 13143 (66.6) 6556 (33.2)
9 Neurodevelopmental disorders 804 (4.1) 497 (3.8) 307 (4.7) **
10
11
Learning disabilities 290 (1.5) 179 (1.4) 111 (1.7)
12 Developmental delay 525 (2.7) 322 (2.5) 203 (3.1) **
13
ADHD 183 (0.9) 112 (0.9) 71 (1.1)
14
15 Sensory integration disorder 254 (1.3) 147 (1.1) 107 (1.6) **
Fo
16 Autism 88 (0.4) 52 (0.4) 36 (0.5)
17
18 Asthma 1311 (6.7) 831 (6.3) 478 (7.3) *
19 Obesity 2896 (14.7) 1844 (14.0) 1046 (15.9) ***
rp
20
21 Gender
22 male 10358 (52.6) 6785 (51.6) 3561 (54.3) ***
23
Birth order
ee

24
25 first-born child 9918 (50.4) 6833 (52.0) 3085 (47.1) ***
26
Gestational age, weeks ***
27
rr

28 <37 1644 (8.3) 784 (6.0) 857 (13.1)


29 37 2557 (13.0) 1348 (10.3) 1206 (18.4)
30
ev

31 38 5282 (26.8) 3124 (23.8) 2152 (32.8)


32 39 5601 (28.4) 4250 (32.3) 1343 (20.5)
33
34 40-41 4580 (23.2) 3603 (27.4) 975 (14.9)
ie

35 ≧42 57 (0.3) 34 (0.3) 23 (0.4)


36
Maternal age at birth of child, ***
w

37
38 years
39
40
<25 2882 (14.6) 2288 (17.4) 591 (9.0)
on

41 25-29 6401 (32.5) 4514 (34.3) 1880 (28.7)


42
30-34 7032 (35.7) 4522 (34.4) 2503 (38.2)
43
44 ≧35 3406 (17.3) 1819 (13.8) 1582 (24.1)
ly

45 Maternal education level ***


46
47 Compulsory school 2846 (14.5) 2061 (15.7) 780 (11.9)
48 Senior high school 7908 (40.2) 5147 (39.2) 2756 (42.1)
49
50 Junior college 4959 (25.2) 3277 (25.0) 1675 (25.6)
51 College and above 3974 (20.2) 2636 (20.1) 1333 (20.4)
52
53 Family monthly income ***
54 <30,000 2745 (14.1) 1860 (14.3) 881 (13.5)
55
30,000-100,000 13729 (70.3) 9211 (70.8) 4502 (69.2)
56
57 >100,000 3065 (15.7) 1944 (14.9) 1119 (17.2)
58
59
25
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 26 of 31

1
2
3 Parental asthma history 518 (2.6) 328 (2.5) 190 (2.9)
4
5 Gestational diabetes mellitus 435 (2.2) 200 (1.5) 234 (3.6) ***
6 Gestational weight gain, kg ***
7
8
< 11 4766 (24.4) 3309 (25.4) 1449 (22.3)
9 11-13 4697 (24.0) 3306 (25.4) 1385 (21.3)
10
14-16 4631 (23.7) 3138 (24.1) 1491 (22.9)
11
12 ≧17 5448 (27.9) 3272 (25.1) 2171 (33.4)
13 Missing data in modes of delivery: 0.2%, birth order: 0.2%, gestational age: 0.1%,
14
15 maternal age at birth of child: 0.1%, maternal educational levels: 0.3%, and family
Fo
16 monthly income: 1.0%, parental asthma history: 0.5%, gestational diabetes mellitus:
17
18 0.2%, gestational weight gain: 0.9%
19 Number of mothers or main care-givers who completed the questions regarding the three
rp
20
21 children’s health issues: neurodevelopmental disorders: 19,717, asthma: 19,720, and
22 obesity: 19,269
23
Data of modes of delivery from birth registration
ee

24
25 Chi square for analyzing differences of obesity, asthma, neurodevelopmental disorders, gender and
26
birth order between vaginal and cesarean delivery
27
rr


28 p<0.05; ** p <0.01; *** p <0.001
29
30
ev

31
32
33
34
ie

35
36
w

37
38
39
40
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
26
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 27 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 2. Association between cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s
4
5 neurodevelopmental disorders after controlling for gestational age, children’s and parental
6 characteristics
7
8 Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI
9 OR OR
10
11
Cesarean delivery 1.22 1.05-1.42 1.15 0.98-1.34
12 Gestational age (ref: 39-41 weeks)
13
<37 weeks 1.94 1.55-2.42
14
15 37 weeks 1.24 1.00-1.55
Fo
16 38 weeks 0.97 0.81-1.17
17
18 ≧42 weeks 1.63 0.58-4.59
19 Gender, male (ref: female) 2.16 1.85-2.52 2.13 1.83-2.49
rp
20
21 First-born child (ref: not first-born child) 1.13 0.97-1.31 1.17 1.00-1.36
22 Maternal age at birth of child (ref: ≧35 years)
23
<25 years 0.75 0.58-0.98 0.76 0.58-1.00
ee

24
25 25-29 years 0.79 0.64-0.98 0.81 0.65-0.99
26
30-34 years 0.78 0.63-0.95 0.79 0.64-0.96
27
rr

28 Maternal education levels (ref: college or above)


29 ≤ Compulsory school 1.09 0.82-1.44 1.07 0.81-1.41
30
ev

31 Senior high school 0.97 0.78-1.22 0.97 0.77-1.21


32 Junior college 0.96 0.76-1.21 0.96 0.76-1.21
33
34 Family monthly income (NTD) (ref: >100,000)
ie

35 <30,000 2.23 1.66-3.00 2.23 1.66-3.00


36
30,000-100,000 1.33 1.04-1.69 1.34 1.05-1.71
w

37
38 NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
39
40 Logistic regression was used for analysis
on

41
42
43
44
ly

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
27
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 28 of 31

1
2
3 Table 3. Association between cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s asthma after
4
5 controlling for gestational age, children’s and parental characteristics
6 Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI
7
8 OR OR OR
9 Cesarean delivery 1.16 1.03-1.30 1.11 0.98-1.25 1.11 0.98-1.25
10
11
Gestational age (ref:
12 39-41 weeks)
13
<37 weeks 1.27 1.03-1.56 1.23 1.00-1.52
14
15 37 weeks 1.18 0.99-1.41 1.17 0.98-1.40
Fo
16 38 weeks 1.19 1.04-1.37 1.19 1.03-1.36
17
18 ≧42 weeks 1.98 0.84-4.65 2.05 0.87-4.84
19 Gender, male 1.40 1.25-1.57 1.39 1.24-1.56 1.40 1.24-1.57
rp
20
21 First-born child 1.23 1.09-1.38 1.26 1.12-1.42 1.27 1.13-1.44
22 Maternal age at birth of
23
child (ref: ≧35 years)
ee

24
25 <25 years 0.90 0.71-1.15 0.90 0.71-1.15 0.88 0.69-1.12
26
25-29 years 1.14 0.95-1.36 1.14 0.96-1.36 1.13 0.94-1.34
27
rr

28 30-34 years 1.03 0.88-1.22 1.04 0.88-1.23 1.02 0.87-1.21


29 Maternal education
30
ev

31 levels (ref: college or


32 above)
33
34 ≤ Compulsory school 0.67 0.53-0.85 0.67 0.53-0.85 0.68 0.54-0.86
ie

35 Senior high school 0.72 0.61-0.85 0.72 0.61-0.85 0.72 0.61-0.86


36
Junior college 0.81 0.69-0.95 0.81 0.69-0.95 0.81 0.69-0.96
w

37
38 Family monthly income
39
40
(NTD; ref: >100,000)
on

41 <30,000 0.67 0.52-0.86 0.66 0.52-0.85 0.67 0.53-0.86


42
30,000-100,000 0.87 0.74-1.02 0.87 0.74-1.02 0.88 0.75-1.04
43
44 Parental asthma history 3.62 2.88-4.55
ly

45 (ref: no)
46
47 NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
48 Logistic regression was used for analysis
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
28
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 29 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Table 4. Association between cesarean delivery and the occurrence of children’s obesity after
4
5 controlling for gestational age, children’s and parental characteristics
6 Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted 95% CI
7
8 OR OR OR
9 Cesarean delivery 1.15 1.06-1.26 1.15 1.05-1.25 1.13 1.04-1.24
10
11
Gestational age (ref:
12 39-41 weeks)
13
<37 weeks 1.03 0.89-1.20 1.04 0.90-1.21
14
15 37 weeks 1.04 0.91-1.18 1.04 0.91-1.18
Fo
16 38 weeks 1.00 0.90-1.10 1.00 0.90-1.10
17
18 ≧42 weeks 2.28 1.26-4.13 2.29 1.26-4.15
19 Gender, male (ref:
rp
20 1.88 1.73-2.05 1.88 1.73-2.05 1.88 1.73-2.04
21 female)
22 First-born child (ref:
23 1.11 1.02-1.21 1.11 1.02-1.21 1.09 0.99-1.18
not first-born child)
ee

24
25 Maternal age at birth
26
of child (ref: ≧35 years)
27
rr

28 <25 years 0.97 0.83-1.14 0.97 0.83-1.14 1.00 0.85-1.16


29 25-29 years 0.99 0.87-1.12 0.99 0.87-1.12 1.00 0.88-1.13
30
ev

31 30-34 years 0.91 0.81-1.03 0.91 0.81-1.03 0.92 0.82-1.04


32 Maternal education
33
34 levels (ref: college or
ie

35 above)
36
≤ Compulsory school 1.70 1.44-2.00 1.69 1.43-2.00 1.71 1.45-2.02
w

37
38 Senior high school 1.60 1.40-1.83 1.60 1.40-1.83 1.60 1.40-1.83
39
40
Junior college 1.36 1.19-1.56 1.36 1.19-1.55 1.35 1.18-1.55
on

41 Family monthly
42
income (NTD) (ref:
43
44 >100,000)
ly

45 <30,000 1.04 0.88-1.24 1.04 0.87-1.23 1.05 0.89-1.25


46
47 30,000-100,000 1.06 0.93-1.21 1.06 0.93-1.21 1.07 0.94-1.22
48 Gestational diabetes
49 1.53 1.20-1.95
50 mellitus (ref: no)
51 Gestational weight
52
53 gain (ref: < 11 kg)
54 ≧ 11kg 1.18 1.07-1.30
55
NTD: New Taiwan Dollar, 1 USD≒30 NTD
56
57 Logistic regression was used for analysis
58
59
29
60
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open Page 30 of 31

1
2 STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies
3
4
Item Reported
5
No Recommendation on page #
6
7 Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the 1-2
8 abstract
9 (b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was 2-3
10 done and what was found
11
12 Introduction
13 Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being 4-5
14 reported
15
Fo
Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses 5
16
17 Methods
18 Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper 6
19
rp
Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of 6
20
21 recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection
22 Participants 6 (a) Cohort study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of 6
23 selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up
ee

24 Case-control study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods
25
of case ascertainment and control selection. Give the rationale for the choice of
26
27 cases and controls
rr

28 Cross-sectional study—Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and


29 methods of selection of participants
30
(b) Cohort study—For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of 6
ev

31
32 exposed and unexposed
33 Case-control study—For matched studies, give matching criteria and the
34 number of controls per case
ie

35 Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and 6-8
36
effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable
w

37
38 Data sources/ 8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of 6-8
39 measurement assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if
40
on

there is more than one group


41
Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias 6-8
42
43 Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at 6
44 Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, 6-8
ly

45 describe which groupings were chosen and why


46
Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for 7-8
47
48 confounding
49 (b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions 8
50 (c) Explain how missing data were addressed 25-26
51 (d) Cohort study—If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed 6
52
53 Case-control study—If applicable, explain how matching of cases and controls
54 was addressed
55 Cross-sectional study—If applicable, describe analytical methods taking
56 account of sampling strategy
57
(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses NA
58
59 Continued on next page
60
1
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
Page 31 of 31 BMJ Open

1
2
3 Results
4
Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers 8
5
6 potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in
7 the study, completing follow-up, and analysed
8 (b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage NA
9
(c) Consider use of a flow diagram NA
10
11 Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) 25-26
12 and information on exposures and potential confounders
13 (b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of 25-26
14 interest
15
Fo
16 (c) Cohort study—Summarise follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) NA
17 Outcome data 15* Cohort study—Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over 8-11
18 time
19 Case-control study—Report numbers in each exposure category, or summary NA
rp
20
measures of exposure
21
22 Cross-sectional study—Report numbers of outcome events or summary NA
23 measures
ee

24 Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted 27-29
25
estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval). Make clear which
26
27 confounders were adjusted for and why they were included
rr

28 (b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized 25-26
29 (c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk NA
30
for a meaningful time period
ev

31
32 Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and NA
33 sensitivity analyses
34
ie

Discussion
35
36 Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 12
w

37 Limitations 19 Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias 16-17
38 or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias
39 Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, 12-16
40
on

limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other


41
42 relevant evidence
43 Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 6
44
ly

Other information
45
46 Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study 19
47 and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based
48
49 *Give information separately for cases and controls in case-control studies and, if applicable, for exposed and
50
unexposed groups in cohort and cross-sectional studies.
51
52
53 Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and
54 published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely
55 available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at
56
http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is
57
58 available at www.strobe-statement.org.
59
60
2
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

You might also like