Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jon Guerrero
Organizational Leadership
ORGL-3322-V02-Behavior/Ethics/Leadership I
The best kind of group to have solve the ethical concerns our company faces in regard to
child slave labor in the production of chocolate would be a formal group. By creating a formal
group, we can ensure the right individuals are placed in the team that can get the outcome that
we want. An informal group will not do much of a difference. A formal group is specifically
designed to meet certain goals and objectives while an informal group is a group that may not be
suitable to work together. We can measure the success of our group by analyzing the situations
we want remedied before and after their task or tasks. It all comes down to choosing who is in
the team. Focusing on individuals who are top performers in their field and get along well
working with others is a top priority. By having the right individuals for the job, we can ensure
that the project can get done successfully. Members that work well collectively with others and
know how to get things done are normally high on the list of qualified individuals. If these
members love doing work that will bring a good in the world, even better.
The main challenges the group may face would be getting to know each other and how
they work. There might be some questions about where to start. Some members of the group may
be more dominating in certain situations than others. We can solve these issues by making sure
the individuals chosen for the group know what they are doing, they know the outcome desired
for the organization, and that they familiarize themselves and the way they work to collectively
reach their goals. The team can gather prior to the start of the project to get to know each other if
they do not already. This can acquaint them to their peers, each other’s work, and the way they
like to work. This can also help to provide the team the details of the project and what we wish
the outcome can be. It can be a good time to brainstorm ideas of how the team should start the
project and looking at ways that they can achieve the objective to solve the ethical concerns of
the firm and minimize child slave labor. To reduce the struggle to be a leader or “manager” of
Guerrero 3
the group, we can also incorporate the idea of a self-managing team. Self-managing teams have
“been seen as a way to overcome the negatives of bureaucracy and hierarchical control. Giving
teams the authority and responsibility to make their own decisions seems to empower individuals
and the team alike by distributing power more equitably” (Organizational Behavior, 2017). By
giving them the authority as a whole, they can focus less on who is the “leader” and focus they
time and energy on the issue or issues at hand. This can lead to group working more collectively
rather than having each member perform certain tasks. By minimizing these actions of individual
work throughout the group, they can work on accomplishing their objectives as a unit.
The group members can consist of members of the company that focus on the supply
chain and logistics. The members can be members of the production team, analysts, logistics, and
quality. They can incorporate procedures that can eradicate the use of children as labor workers.
This will hopefully decrease the number of children that are taken and used for slave work
around Ghana and the Ivory Coast. I would bring in a few members of the community as well.
Maybe have both, a local government spokesperson and non-government organization leaders in
the group as well. This can foster the image of the brand, Cadbury Chocolate, as working with
members of the government and NGOs to eliminate child labor in the production of chocolate.
This can lift not only the spirits of the member of the community, but it can bolster the attitudes
of the group members and consumers as well. By incorporating members of the government, we
can get an idea of how things work in the particular areas that we will be working at. It is
beneficial to know the culture, the laws, and the regulations of what we can and cannot do to
achieve the goals that we have in place. Adding leaders of non-government organizations as
members that want to join the cause and do good is a great idea, because they are normally
inclined to work on humanitarian rights and have resources available that can benefit the project.
Guerrero 4
Overall, going with the interests of the community will lead to the most beneficial
outcome. In this scenario, the interest of stakeholders outweighs the interest of the shareholders.
The stakeholders are all those that have interest in a company either directly or indirectly. This
can mean the owners, the top executives, the consumers, the employees, the vendors, and all the
way down to the kids working the cocoa farms. By focusing on the greatest good, the company
can have more added value. This can bring the company even more benefits because of less
money spent trying to settle lawsuits, lawyer fees, fees based on regulations, and overall bring
stability to the firm. By using the organization’s power, we can foster a sense of urgency to get
things changed and minimize the number of children that work on the cocoa farms and thus
decreasing the amounts of child slave labor. The core ethical values that are more important is
the well-being of the greatest number of people. Like I mentioned before, having the firm move
towards the interests of stakeholders can lead to accomplishing the targeted objectives. It benefits
the organization to focus on the well-being of their stakeholders because generates a good image
for the organization, it reduces the time focusing on legal matters, reduces the number of losses
to legal matters, and it could increase the total productivity of the organization because people
References: