Rayleigh Fading channels in Mobile Digital] Communication Systems Part I : Mitigation Bernard Sktar, Communications Engineering Services Abstract tutorial} part fon, & Yael facing B Us9 Stee 9 F part ToP-d LEM SCE Of Bae: aa faves as ae degradation hagga ce ae BS We GAA AQ GeE PASAT, O18 Gees TWol sacl TzA4 Partie] ERSTE) Ags ae 3 rang ] Teas Te =n = er 7% 1. ae ‘ear | iain ley —+ Pea description werstorm | osiption bate ‘n val fom] [om ee iat} |e J woe sagem | (reds ring | ES TW 1 Fading channel manifestations,UZAZA7| profile Multipath-intensity Weck spaced-time conrelatin®2 2] profile}el S@ Al2F AS Be Qglaell SE BH R4HS BAT, A822 LEMS. OAS SHS USste ABS] AlAs Moo We SAE “SA ABASC A BHO, 2 AGT Bs BA Be SAAB] @ ol PSE A gol Bul Beisel ay DH Bese] Be 2 eg ESS 2th ' de ggase Nemo sae TF Bee sony 2 Toe gg ae ag TE UEC OIA Je ao a01ct = Ae] TP A 88) threshold By SIVA Tre WESC WeASe ONE BOIS SG Aa aD AGS UY siz] PE ogss az 47g] YEO] RRC. ut. ABIDE saced-frequency corvelation®= 4 epq& Doppler-frequency shift v9] AB B+ (RAS BAG OAS SD ey Es Ae AME BE(Dopper | Felol Ba BeHo|, RAPE = AO FHF A zapoy wiato (ct, B4EN S Tee We SEIT poco spectrum SAI TAS ofZlet Be VENI, RDS SAE “STF ole wae stationary scatter ADIL Am f-HBS VAS S488 TES vehicular antemat SYLEN BIE Apolo sia] ABS B= Doppler shiftol We sharp upper limit wf ad gd Ss Solty. S71 HSS HE AS SE MSA AIA cy oj sey BIE ocatter2t SANE O 8S 7H BE ABER SESS SHE yy platform o] we FU we Awe aq ACO BU SUSU BAA ALON, sonic, popper Ae AMER ES =) Wage aeae UT, S71 WARS DSIAemplitude cp ctral broadening EE Doppler spread® correlation} Hate 2St IKSaS 7H) couelation)ol uisho! 218 7H = Q20U, 1S ue ae wore 350 BEA UN FES WHE URE Goo weg sia aed ft Tl HE BA - JHE Be o}uIOLAD) BASE, 1S TST ath power spectral density)S@JE RC 4H2] to f= UT» Be AG Ske oa SS mot mean squared(rms) delay spread, ,[1]2] S018 $21701210 AE 052) 2S IMIS Was ata gal Ad +8 Date y= L5e, (2) ole.Tume- spreading mecnanism She to multipath = rei Bt iow egecaey oust Dorper sae ‘rmthtipace dotey nproed Tous in EMF Cheneat FAS pee earn! gree ere aan savin Ss ve! = iets =, areas 1@ 3 Small-scale fading : mechanisms, degradation categories, and effects Doppler spread f,8 BAZ TE AR BARS Ze oL) O] tutorial@l Pat 10144, OAS Ba Voly OSE ty 2 SHe BAA 57) 110] GS2 VSS BAT n- 4p 0s @ ar =z Degradation Categories in Brief Part] Ol LIEW degradation B#S2 1 339] contextual HA] LYERH SIC, O12 small-scale fading mechanism, 259 ae qHWIeEA degradation categories, 14D ASE, CO] IBS Part [of LIEHIC}.) APO] AZE 2G Ew Sol Bee a, BUA Ty? T;(delay time®] symbol time UU & we eh trequency-selective fadingo] UERACE Ch o| AWE sae Uae gE] symbol time $718 222 WAU was] DOR} ASE S22 8 (channel-induced ISI)S Y 2 2ICH, AHO] AZE AIG Ew Gol BBE a, TeX TPB flat fading = frequency-nonselective fading®|2}2 SIC}, 0] Aso, symbol] BE ag Tea SE oymbol AZ 2 71H} & BEI ae, ate & BCH ©4IO14, signal time spreading®l 01 £8 421] symbol Alla] A218 overlap o) am UG, aaa] Ee SBE phasor SEES YEW SSUCSNAL A Bz VV Yas Lesy) mzol as ABV SUCh a4 endo 28g awe Be AUT = WO frequency-selective fadingOl2kD 2HET, OI BBS VTE BLS MIs wa 2A woHsel acy Flat fading degradation > 97 @ WU}C} BoD, A, BE Ve AMEG 2B 2 ySt Wied, fading EE no fading)o@ Aol SHA Bee eal el ut. Ane SHg Hoes OVIEE Isl a 2g Usp) HA, AWS Meee am aa aus: aSHe E71 Was Bao) HA fat fadingo] LERZO] Be Sh AZ Ewe Bw a AS THT, @ MOC fact fading 2H OF¥ZICL oI BE Ad Bi Ao TE & AOI. Fast fading? 22H Yalole] aw AS ¥eo AY Z21014 HS vada a QS 71elo] Jee UEC MBE, OE AWS fading SAS 27) ABE GEA B we] Bayt at AOI, 12S $4) ASABE ZH SSO BEL OF JBSOIA] Boe Wo] BS 714 wy BA Gael 4e ole. HEE, fast fading2 $2 ineducible ere rate@ USte SNR 284 Bat 9) §Sso Tage Bs) geo] z ot. aut age phase -locked-loop(PLL) #41] 39) Be SENSE OTE. A1Z Eola Bae AS galt 2e HY TT, 1 slow fadings FE gor gaudy O74, BBs Wola Eats ty! ae A ale Mea al Th. so 4 io Sap jo 4 i ais. 2% AHBE, H X50] ASE Sas a WH?) Bish] BED ABS + ¥ze0] 1/7, EE ds fading rete 1/7) EE fy fading 2&4} 2H, Sez, ve Nes] Moe S Bo AW WAS slow fadingo 8A BRET, fast fadngolla | gelolsi= Vaqss Bei] Aah, AIS NZS AY Hog 23 aibbl 32822 slow fading®] ERS 2101 Ch, Mitigation Methods BAO] BANe) “the good, the bad, and the avful’2 WE of 3B Py EN Bt Al MA 42a 8S BFs 2BR. | Frequency stectve fading Yost facing satorion wit (Pgeam approach 0.8) 102 "6 \ at ting Bayle it 103 Awan wt 1dr yp 5202530 E/N (08) VB 4 oz] BS: the good, the bad, and the awful 72 AHS Astiezd gus Sa Bg = additive white Gaussian nose(AWGN) WoL O18 nominal modulation types HE Bu uso 24 Ye ase UE qt. EgNo?l A $oe4 S235 ay B28 e+ ach Rayleigh Imit22x UthIS 72d 2a 2 8S Ast Bw ine-cf-sightLos}ee 0] QS Wy, flat fadng EE slow fadingoll 4) $2228 YEE SNR] S¥ola #8o ang eqeq. RYN S80 BFOninverse near function)OC}, SNR] Batol Wate, SSS Boe “bad” 2101C4, Rayleigh fsb ae, overbarsS 7121 parameters: 2@ fading experience2] “ups” Z} “downs“o] WelAd Bz0] eas UES 21g, AMEE, Pat EyNol Se BAS Be WAWYSE Tad we oe Se phts@ 3 2th. Yas ge dao) Ee = error floa?} #E Jan gSS ‘whl’ UENAT, O74 BIE oz] BBS 059 gol Ese. fe ae Mol (frequency-selective-fading) EE fast fading®] severe distorting effects 4 @ICt. Be AYO] Morys AI As AES SES, 2 AAW SS Soigz] oss UERC, S, Wego] QP oeu oS a E/N TS 23s BS awe se Bae wha oom 24 a0. aust ae mitigation | YEE fact fadngol olf Y Alol Bet. 1® 5 Basic mitigation types YE AZ| mitigated scale, Pa EYNSSS FAH os! “awful” BE] tH) “bad” Rayleigh limit curve? SEE AOIch US, $215 EH Farol deo wes 8 ASlnconelsted sample}o] JUS AZ SHE 718A diversity} ZA oz Be Ato] SiN wolde] S8ee AAA # UD AWGN S50] 82s Las & Qh, Aeboa4, sNRAA Az Asa FR9] SUS AASHAAF mitigation 7eEol 7s 2th. S229 Bolg HA So Sago a H BHA BAAS Te UAV =, 2S bss Mole SSS a al] AHA ABE + VE mitigation WESS ANSP) AeA Boe, AtB3}7] A$ mitigation approach = Jt AQ A# Wiss St, A HalS AZ mitigation US2es, diversity 4S Git, Far AB ASS AA a7] Wet Mitigation +Equaliztion® 20 38a wolgol 8 We SE ISIE BAS 4 Qt SOAS Teo ‘awful of] BS BSOE¥E Yad" ole] JS BAce EGE SAO EAS + Ich ISIS] equalising BIS BA BE oH] tH) @ Az aoe Be! Qt, ABALL, equalization: 7H) ft 2US desH1 a 208 1 on Bue gues Sau, 2 tp ae o: © a om fic 3 SBA(phase linearity)S dispersedpulse 2] time reverse$] $4 @zi(complex conjugate)@I equalizer filter USA BS EA Sach] OS AAA, AS Sel Az Bl Bel] WEA SS} (equalizer) filte @ AW ltime-varing) chamelol ASShAU wero HC} we Sa] BAS adaptive equalizers?} EC. SHE AF mitigaionkt 4 Bo] a4 au. S OAS Ett diversityS ASH. AZ mitigation] ¥es] ae Ag 24 gto] CHA] Bate BSS] UAE RSSE A SURE, BF AS UE ¥SSq aus gets] SEO, Sele U2 Bele go} Wala FE FHA) 7) 2et9] #4) BSB ASEH, “DFE(Decision Feedkack Equalizer) = lengtho} tap weighths?} BE Gal Y¥o| quae SALE BU cokerently combination)=] S aasS transversal filter 91 feedforward section 7G. DFEE £¢t ojo] ASH AB Yor st = AUS AAAS feedback sectionz PANT, [1a] DFES] W#9) 7B idee SH Be H. 7 AS00414, G4 SSSo] Fae | = 25} F259 ASA S9n047) ve ZC, ‘MLSE(Vaximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation) equalizer BE 7+S¢t oOlEL sequences BAAS Oe 22h] 4a) g R28 Sasth A RUS) Wt $B linear S S44 MS OSs] MS AO sequence 3% St}, MLSE S8J1E AS Viterbi decoding algoithm[]S ARB} Sa1B She Forney (Jol SHA 74] t=] 0124 Ch, MLSES sequence arroro] 83 243}4) ZICH AoA 7-2 optimalstCh, Viterbi decoding algorithm®] MLSE 37] 7 MBAS AMHCAE Yeo WE of, S21E SS Viterbi emalerE4 2 220, | EE Sol, Sa Viterbi equalizers 2tS¢t Global System for Molile Communications(GSMOl4 $485] edaptive equalizationg VERA th + OW SS TABS halmackS 2S 4171 S407] Wzol Spread-specum 718ES 454 Yas Isl 43g SSAIET O18 BCL Bo 4 we direct sequence spread-syectrum(DS/SS) binary phase shift —_keying(PSK) communication chanel stL42] direct rath@} #}L}9] reflected path 7-9SICt. SMESH S799] ABS Aaa SH WMHS Ho rygs AAS USsz apo) Bake UE 7st ae sa7)7} ag Sse Ay See ag S11, dss 208 eda a & C95 US 20] Been. 9 = Ar De(8 ces Cafe + Ant rpeC— eDcos(att+é) @ OI MDE AOE ASD, KE AKESUEN)SH 2 E(pscudonoise spreading codeID y= = BES Aol] de 7 2 ob Bae ALolD, ©, 299 BA Qe BESO ACD 7IsH7h, a ae sol aage of Zaoldy ool THA 2120, Ag Se Asol S78 al = dso) 14 HSH Sa Bo] beSICh Ax de%0 cos Oxf d+ aAx(t—rpot e(t—rp)cosQxttt&) 6) oh 2 w a Ge oy de ti ae ee ar 2 In sagt i >» wee i of 1 ti Baa + tAA e()=1012, Be yt ae AB(YS)9] Wo] SA chip duration uo AgS, [Sercoet pale fer@atoae 6) a +2 84 ae UD 4& PN chip duration BU} GA ALY SU, TB}, spread-spectrum system= 2219] code-correlation receiver2] Zoi] sq Th S32 G8s £8422 Syst, BS AY FE [Sl7} ABACS Ds/ss A] Ana BH BABE, Tt aA Be sa 714 aq BoA BS 28s quae 22 =z aig = 2g quae Bo = Bat Rake receiver2] WY S/O] Th 7-3] (finger)ol Al LO] 2)= Ab] HEP MILH, O2ae AWAoe Aas TSC ag 7K) OK alee] BB pol fingtE9H S2A2e HUA O Shh @z 282 BS aoe Besa 10] EES Part 1AM, Fz] flat fading 22 FUE 4 VE OD AS BARREL sie gS] Sule JE BSS) mol) JS uae Saol4 does wae a Ba qBo] THEA VERSE Bus ss As AWAOE faded frequency response®] BE lobesol 01171 WZol, Ds/ssa] AS THe ase mitigates}7191 SS WON EEE, pike M22 BIH Yor gal ASE UA Vsol nvlling effect(Part 1 oles wolehst WE ol AQ wWAlGcatterer medium)al let SP 201Ch «Frequency -hopping: spectimiFH/SS)4 HE se ae spread B28 22 hopping rateS MBSE Sue aaa wl Oece MH 4S seed AEH oa 4 Ch DS/SSt 8] DStH, —mitigatior mechanisms S314 @o/WUh. FH #47182 S471 ame WE Heol Ia US as Sue Wed us Ae Je7) Sesp 47] Wg Hal Bees 2 aa. ‘Orthogonal nubtiplexing(OFDME BM equalizer] AS Holds We 4 30. Oo ds use ad de weet a2 ee frequency-division 4ea718 eat gol sue gag 23 AS O42 BUA(subbnad) oe LETH, 0] subband US Aa eae} Ah ast F4 a terol Wei/TQl ¥Etymbol rate or signaling rate)S 22] S71 BW YMC Amey Aa SOE BG, OFDME ##H Kineplexe 4 32 SIC, oO] NSE 1S FA AAPM DFO SEE AAC], 21D high-definition televisionlHDTV) $9 BEEZ, coded OFDMCOFDM)] 1E 2e SEA Ast ABR Th 12] ‘Pilot signd= W892] S7)4 gull AG ES gts! Aza] F012 BOM, Pilot signals inbend tome ® 4 Fa} EWMUAA SBS]O] AAU] AS eH o] Be 2eB ES ASE pit sequence | Al2F Evighuolay +48 s}o} 20 AYPE HAA ASS Mast THI] FeFast-fading distortion & AlA| &7] 41% Mitigation ‘fast fading distortion”] WeH4= phase tracking 27517] BE robust BAS J| EE ditterentially 27S HAD B B}7| AS AS SE alo] Basics) ‘signal redundancy #7HEO EA Wel/T,2 F230] Hog sol fe UTAU YA Bt +] BE Ie UAE ASE wa 23 HE BYNES ZAA71 HEA ey a 8 BY interleaving? mitigation AZ shal 2th SOR] BYNol Were, BES BES ASs] YS SLUT error floor 2} BORIC stast fading} S5b+ MBA Woy yo] EA] of SsE Aeol= SU/IE filtering 7] $0] facings SE 4 Gch ame a 4a 932 OFDMIZ Ges] woe See 4 QC, Deu Fast fading Doppler spreading®] OFDM2] subcarrier2] ABIS HAYS 7corupt) Zo} cy oF aac, polyphase filtering 71€(16]E time domain shaping} 41% YL] spectral sidelobesS BAANE duration extentions AZ} 714 ay APS s)01 uy, Way jagss gAsicd Ese 2 Oo] BME oln] gaz IsTe ACTladiacent interference) = ERED, post-processing equalizer2} canceling filter of HA AAR + sich [7] aea8 channel SNRAA| Eas ALA a7] AR Mitigation st Fame mpg EE fast fadng)S AAs] Ae mitigetionS) aaa om Gas a8 =, OIA “bad”e) ofa AWGN 350) Gash AH diversity?) ON eh u. diviersitye? B01 9 mcorrelated rendtios$ 7H) 441718 ASsvl Ae USS TPS at SS UE] Aa tS 310] ZICh G14 Uncorelaed S23 & “Time diversity-4O1E 7,2] Alt ZH JAD LAS) AS OB Al S dSs wees 25 ole aa 224 ABSOZE intorbaving= diversity®] Sh 17] 23 ojct, “Frequency diversity-4o}E £9] Sih 22g JHID AE U2 Lad wee ase as Bees Band width expansion 234 diversity] @ eh¥ol eq He of ke to Sea As A -a2s|oiaiah, OAS L= Wf N42] 40h AEC WF fh equalization} & tA] Beh ITY A goa Qua ane Be 3h TB}, expanded bendwidth= mitigationS SEG + VE diversity] ee dag AZY ASW (diveroitys Estoy ASS Wa 42h +Spread spectrum? 2H) ASE AAA! a Se SSE HIE BW exparionS] ++ diversityS nit SA zst a AS]BUI, Ds/ssd] As, USSR BE 0] S42] chip durationgtS ASA Os az AAR = th aut AWGN. Zep] AAAS TA Al Ag 2 BMS Zo] Rake receiver(So) LYEHH Ss Bee Saas ESE az] B22] quA8 B71a2 = APSE 20] MSetct, Rake receiver 7} MBSE DS/SSHZE path diversity 7t Ol FO] ACD SC, Rake recevier= 914 $7] reception®] @ 2. otU differentially B7] BE AuolAS S A SHB 25 GS AS ehel(one bit long)o] LH SAS 38, ‘FH/SSE WWE diversity mechanism? = A GSO} AG, GSM AABE mobileol = Lela SIO] spectral nulo] ABE ASE BL sh slow FHT hops/s)S 418 Uh *Spatial diversity BS 7171Z01 way AE 1a AMOS Jay 4 S)0S O18 Ge 4a ge] a Son goat, ASAE 249] WAY Sas sys U BE Buss Bale Zee) aH 44 Q5]0] AF Bt, Global Positioning System(GPS)2] a} 2 o| AAWES ES multiple spaced S471 SEY +050] AU “Polarization diversity 19]= 2129] #712 uncorrelated samples @7/918 E OE weer, +O1E diversity HS SOIL A104 A} repetition coding®] BYE BEA woz 4. AHL repetition codingB} ] SSAO|D Y Qeeaoly Agu sNRol a] Sag Aasy] 1 SO] Saeee, oz] 8a age age se es UEP WU, Mus y Be de was Ze fo Alo] coding? Aste Ha 2ESE Ey NE EOC, interleaving 282 We Sa Bye (15,20-212 CMF mold S804 AAs SSS ASev] A ASAE mitigation schemeS OTE 2H Se] Baas Be 2 told, oe 8SS Ba ial) olga Awe S49e FH Pepe e Ss] 2 oF se dO] Ame ABE Aza tast Q| aA SSS] sas Tue TK Te (7b) eee alps AY 57] Wake Hed AE ASSES AY fadngsS doior Sh distortion mitigation= Part] 3 A7]81e, FSCS ASO upper limit, LE lower limit AIS SH, Fast-Fading Distortion : oi] 1, we Aye] #540] BSa7) ga As a 7} BUSA ASS op B 201, AS HoSSR FS ASSO] WS fast fading 2Sol GSH SU. foo W Cha 6) S85 st} EE BE eee tee Th (285) ‘fast-fadingZA ORHAN ItS Sasha BE W2/S3 Ses VHT, 29 IE Fe Se, fast-fading=PLLO] SSSHS BA] ZILS sy] W Eo] PLLOS BS HH] SS wet = 2 gure. S ¥£g0] AY HOUSES amste ‘Bt redundancy 89 $I}, 9280] LB Wass as BE a2 flattadinges DRIT, 1M og oe og “Oo Solr og rt rio 2 4 71 Bee] ASE Repleish limit IBWory SAE Hore. AEE random Doppler spreading] = 4G 24 820M) BS azo oe A SO EYN 2 EHO iwedusible floor? le AS BEC, in-band pilot tone Z} frequency-control loop. 2] ABO] 1G ineducble #S aes Y 4 30h srandom Doppler $220) la] WYSE of} floor AAA] Aah (100 —200x fading rew)JEE JESS MOYSVO aa S JEAL2ICH 26] ol8e ABE US BSCTDMA) 1S Al AW WF) architectural motive 4 st} ole. floor 2371 aah ole Bal Haws APs] AWGN 45. Je SsICh Fuk ALY wo] g AB: ol2 57] dasol yeu SW Sy @ ABS da Molge 3¢e Des, 285 SH EEG Be wyoe zee a be io uh, (aes) ‘SS 3201 AY MOleSS 2281] Zo] HIE tht-tading ABS SCt AUS GUA dete See Ba sich ay EE BE eSo] Das oAOHt aa. ‘Adaptive equalization, spread spectrum(DS EE FH), OFDM pilot signal WYSE 4H4 Be Molge gag ee sth European GSM AWE $2774 ASS 2 es ges 38s 24 UES sb] Fa a Hs AZ SE midamble training sequences ASEH, 2S Lise] Fae aaa 43 Sibyl el Viterbi equalizerS AMZ SIC}, a4 459 S30] SQN, AWGN 2 So] S2A1717) Aad diversitySHU os BR BYO|Y WHYS Assy, DS/SS sigmlingl Wet, TE BHLe 220 U2 22 82S BALES SEA Rake receivert diversityS ASst 7) Heh ABS # BIT, Fast fading} #4 NAS BOs AS : 3 NESE AS B2] USF] YE BF, AME O)aSRC AC, ASS Sel RSS|E fost-fading EE ue saa mole Bol UEPC, Lo W Cha (aga) gE fate (0b) EMERY HOVS UzB4I RES A Med LE ONES ASHE. ORE HAE SAAC, A az S87} 224 al As WS UssS a 448 75 JeSeU tO,ole 42 2H ollol UE a7] Bez SApBICh sfast-tading®] RAHA JHE Ba shal HE 82/82 lee 8c MESS Sb A171 AHA redundancy 28 Ch solzo|4| 142) 23} SAKE BE clay 27 Bus] Sale Aaa Se Ee o. ‘gy gz) sgl gga we AWGN S501 G2sb1 sia ole Se 2] dvesitya da 38 Be a2 9H age Egat GSM] 482 Viterbi equalizer AWE delesc 62] SS Be GSM AZ BE USES Bade wos Th. Z2HG= 4 active mobile werdlAl FE Th. 2Z 6 normal burst® FSD YE GSM TDMA framedt time slot sg HY Sfe AST YE FEA & bust training EE sounding sequence} S32] 22|= 26bit midamble2] 2} Qo sr wal WES See, ae BIE O57 mol CEE slot rateZ 1733 slots/s) midambe®] 342 4S aga es WE adaptive aude 24717 (HH 0.57?as slot2] 212 371 Sah 7180] BAS UAlA si] AHA, MSS HOS JB2 sty] He SE A Ta so Bal HasyqS ged, ge] Bea, + at ae Woe 3eS 3 midambe& E12] AYS ABS = Ele] Eh VM fast-fading degradation SLAMS osICy, — AF DH Ao] ABS GSM 421712] SRA, WiKoe/he (55.56m/s)] Bast Fro OES, BS SE G0dMA7t BOD Aes A=0,.33m), 4BLERH Sele Bt Wet AK SalAlzHuol | Boch AME + Ch Ee 20 Py a ti ro rir (uy ABBE, Ae SAE 0.57%] 412 BO Su | Uh. HO S5ol4 VSS VSS sy aT s] oie AE eR AZ S7lah wa HE Saao= 2 A120] Bast GSM TOMA 22 4121} midamble2] 4 ALS] GAO] O] ool He, SE az Alo Bho} fest fading VU Ba 371 2 Baol olay S Bee vlaIch GSM ¥SS(EE BES, B27} 2440/7] WEES WL Amiok/OlD WASS W=200kEHOITE BE S217} EAL 4 BAC os AG Belo], = Duss] Ab O|MOLE, Iu AVE olSsto] aval 9) B71 WARS Hx 100KBOIU. F691] ZO, GM FAI Sabe aug AZS gol sa] la aa es HE ASI} Io, oO] Bale S71 41 Vite S8plE A#ALe Bae + OIC Age ae A GSM #47]uol APB sffunctional Hocks$ UERNSU O12 2 @ aa 82 Bees 0 Awle Ae oh?) Hal ARSON, [7] fl sores +O Frcaes | sere ‘oo | aw 4 wet) | atte 1¥ 7 GSMol 3-85) 0/2) Viterbi Equalizer U}ZIBE cholo A, Viterbi algorithm = ol] Al] MSES ASH ISH APBSIOIIT, 408 UEE WU WEA Syo] Ba eo] Sls LEY B+ 3ICh SBE CSO 4g) training sequence BARS v9, 2D Se taining sequence] BIN sy(9O1 CHS} Vth PD = sl DAHL D 2) C1714 “2 convolution UERAT, 421 AAA ry(DE normel bustS¥H £85] OID hyOU impdse SYS IIE filters Bu} Ich O1AE (Dol HST. o| 28 SHE AOS SANE eels SoD, MEE] OST Zo] AAS ACOS UERAT, D4 ial) = Se DRL D+ hth eC + Hel) a3) FAA ROE sO 21 ae ae 0] th. ROI} peaked(impulse-like) function®14, #6) =k 01T, ne US22, windowing function] WAZ At Bald, SAE ASHP affordable function! AGHA SHO] FH AOS FAT, window lengthE 21 24¢1 channel-indueed Isl] S83 Bats leh S#s] G HOF BF Cy, windowel Ws 2255 interval L2= 5 2] contributions?] 2 24 B88aC, Zl Los WS 7) AUS BASS] Goussian filtering let 20] SE controlled IST WHE OTC, oae HAH 24 HO] keying(MSK)o1U, observation 2 2o UALS US JE Agel Ae ado] SE AS FE IS] EON, We, 1 GS 2] AoA, Lo=LastLe t GSM AWS WEF 15-Dusdl a 22 Oy Qo] wt See ae] af 22]o} 21U. BIE Z7IE 3.69e801Ch WA GSMO ABE Viterbi equalian = 4-sHl= 224 9) WES HIG, olalziwod 2 LHe 22} HSK, Viterbi equelizer®] 7) a] t° JHS€t sequences] L, ¥lE dee sequence 24S HOF WE 201d, TB AV LBE sequences ZS 28, zho] olattel Tee] Batol weoa 2°] gute 12 wWeE h 2 EE | BA SH hGH windowed estimate = aes ae, Us, We Bae WY S(chennel-comected reference vaveform)2 BY Ag ae SHE $41 HOLE] SHES} ulmsfojzach2eu sadaol, #4 Hol GeSS F Ago J3gAo wos 4 WS BAe 33 HBAS windowed Ay] Bet + WORD DUR ae, ole ag Az] Jee 7 Pape Qu 22 deg ugg, Guse Viterbi decoding algorithm(VDA)o| 2] 278 GAC, VDAE SA8 sequenceo] al 7S 4 8 (Maximum likelyhood estimate)S +28 The) Direct sequence spread spectrum system] 482 Rake receiver Interim Specification 9§ (5-95) Ze diversity = AZS] «HH Rake receiver!?-9]E A}84! DS/SS BBY AA wg UEC, Ase, FE WE AS 48) Jt as gute go aS EE B24 IRI BS sequence 101112 2 8 asd 574) BB BSEO, ipa ess CH Sh ar if jo rio 2 im sO — iy iw ecesgene 1 o Day ie 4 % 4 caeartt cedars 19 8 three-finger Rake receiver 2]3H BOW AE chips9l of Atole] US 2f2t9] att Ho] Boleta ASH, UALESH AP ys 7 ao Sao] EAfstS fingerS 2M Th fingers 2} A]ZtO] BalStct, S fingers= SAS rab rpB IIE AZt St fh EAH}, 0] lela, Gs BES Seba] one chip timeol lef Be] =]O} We 282 G7) 22 Be + Ut, ty AGALS a) Ast devieedd Fa |S AABAA HOLES: 2 (milliseconts) EE 3 = chip time( Ty> Ts, JZ} Blot] 3 » rola Bee 4 w Gras z = uu 4 Ir 2 ab Bo tt i rio eg chs okt ob sa ag 2 ol a a a a a TS loo Be x AS] SANA, separate comelator= 2} finger Aejol 4BSIc, 0] cold, ZS chip sequence 1011 12] AS versions Aese 3A BB+ QO, Aged Ae eBS 72 Be) SiS AS We} Boda finger sequenced Sle LFEHHZRC, 4 SVE Alto ASS alah Faret Zz PN code JI TH ERE 3 SBaa18 AGTH, Ba Boe ES ROD) 2] = OA} SC. cihp = Ses} FAtet., A129 Sa ASS divesityS ASS A orth, Sila © chip alzh ps/ss chips aH £ BE ABA YA one x128oagug ca sequence?# JHE codeOl orthogonal OIE} ABE, sl} EE BS chip times 21é# ABSIE code chipsS Blot o1s1At AGE AoW AG chire BA noise floo:(conelation sidelobes)9] Aol BEE 22010 Rake reveiverol ole] ZSIL mitigation path diversity S20] Gh PN see AHS E823 Beatq B7) 22 2ue “chips! UAB a Ssh 7 mh orth Rake receiver 91, o] GUA BE Bia, TYPE pDs/ss JAWS 2 ae Roth Esa, point yA 43) 22 BH EAlg EME GE finger 2A ‘St Wt QZ Ginter chip interference)o] aad, spread-spectrum processing gan 1 @ HW Te We Avs le Ags ASC, OF HE equalization 1S-950l BAD B2s}7) BET. ae o1 Pat TAA, Saal A a 4a £45 +84) Bel 2 eaane, (tutorial9] Part] 22 Tf: 2} degradation category] 3 2] A mitigation 718H0] TRON 2D, ASE, Teo} Mol = AA @ Sela, FBI] AE mitigation) we S, Is-s50] S$25 GSM} CDMA JAS LENA ST. References (1) TS. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall, 1996 [2] IGProakis, Digitat Communications, Ch, New York! McGraw-Hill, 1983 [8] RLBogusch, FW, Guigliano, D.LXnerp, “Prequercy- Setective Scintitiation Effects | and—Decision Feedback Equalization in High Dats- Rate and Satellite Links,” Pros, IEEE, vol, 71, 108, June 1893, pp, 14-87 [4] SUH, Qureshi, “Adaptive Equalization,” Proc, IEEE, vol.73, m8, Sept, 1985, pp.1340-37, 15] GD, Forney, “The Viterbi Algorithm,” Proc, IEEE, vol 61, no3, Mar, 1978, pp.268-78. [6] BSklr, Digital Communications Fundamentals and Applications C8, Englewood cliffs, NJ: Frentice Hall, 1988 I] Ro Price and FEGren Jn, “A Communication Technique for Multipath channels,” Proc, IRE, vol46, no3, Mur 1958, pp555-70, f8] GL, Turin, “Introduction to Spredd-Spectrum Antimultinah Teciniques and Their Application to Urban Digital Radio,” Proc, IBEE, vol68, Me. 1980, pp328-83, 18] MK. Simon et al, Spread Spectrum Communication Handbook McGraw Hill, 1994 [10] FAmoreso, “Use of DS/SS Signaling to Mitigate Rayleigh Fading in ad Dense Satter Envircnment“ IEEE Commun, vol3, no2, Apr. 1996, pa52-S1 [11] MA Birchler and S.CJasper, “A 62 kbps Digital Land Mobile Radio System Employing M-16QAM," Proc, 1992 IEEE Int'l, Conf, sel, Topics in Wireless Commun, Vancouver, Canada, June 25-25, 1992, pp158-82, [12] HSari, G, Karam, and I, Jeandaude, Techniques for Digital TY Broadessting” IEEE 103, Pers “Transmission TerrestrialCommun, Mag,, vol,33, no.2, Feb, 1995, pp, 100-109, (13] JK Cavers, “The Ferformance of Phase Locked Transparent Tone-in-Bond with Symmetric Phase Detection,” IEEE Trans, Commun, ,vol39, no§, Sept, 1991, pp, 1389-99 (14) ML. Moher and Lodge, “TCMP-A = Modulation Coding Strategy for Rician Fading Crannel,” IEEE JSAC, vol, 7, no, 9, Dec, 1989, pp, 1347-55, [15] R.L, Bogusch, Digital Communications in Fading Channels! Modulation and Coding, Mission Research Crop,, Santa Barbara, CA, Rep, no, MRC R-1043, Mar, 11, 1987, [16] F, Hauris, “On the Relationship Between Muitirate Polyphase FIR Filters and Windowed, Overlapred FFT Processing,” Proc, 23rd Annual Asilomar Conf, Signals, Sys, and Comp, Pacific Grove, CA, Oct, 30-Nov, 1, 1983, pp, 485-88, [17] RW, Lowdermilk and F, Harris, “Design and Performance of Fading Insensitive Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing(OFDM) Using Polyphase Filtering Techniques,” Proc, Oth Annual Asilomar Conf, Signals, Sys, and Comp, Pacific Grove, CA, Nov, 3-6, 1996, [18] MKavhrad and GE, Bodeep, “Design Experimental fro a Direct-Sequence Spreac-Spectrum Ratio Using Differential Phase-Shijt Keying Modulation for Indoor Wireless Communications,” IEEE JSAC, SAC-5, no, June 1987, pp815-23, [19] GC, Hess, Land-Mobite System Engineering, Boston’ House, 1993, IH, and and Results val, Radio Artech [20] J, Jagenauer and E, Lut, “Forward Corvelation Ceding for Fading Compensation in Mohile Satellite Channels,” IEEE JSAC, vol, SAC-5, no2, Feb, 1987, pp2Z15-25 [21] PI, McLane, et, al, “PSK ond DPSK Trellis Codes for Fast Fading, Shadowed Mobile Satellite Communication Chennets,” IEEE Trans, Commun,, vol, 38, nol, Now, 1988, pp, 1242-46, [22] C, Schlegel, and DJ, Costello, Jc, “Bandwidth Efficient Coding for Fading Channets! Code Construction and. Performance Anatysis,” IEEE JSAC, vol, nod, Dec, 1989, pp, 1956-68 [23] F, Edbauer, “Performance of Interleaved Trellis-Coded Differential 8PSK Modulation over Facing Chonneis," IEEE JSAC, vol7, no§, Dec, 1989, pp. 1340-46 als. K Mokreni, “Peformance of Coded Systems over Channels," IEEE 40, nod, Jan 1982, Error Soliman and Fading Dispersive ‘Trans, Commun, vel, pp. 51-59 [25] D, Divsalar and F, Pollara, “Turbo Codes for PCS Application” Proc, ICC '95, Seattle, WA, June 18-22, 1995, pp, 54-59 [26] A, J, Bateman and JP, McGeehan, “Data Transmission over UBF Fading Mobile Radio Chaunels," IEE Proc,, vol, 131, pt, F, nod, July 1934, pp, 364-74 le7] L, Hanzo and J, Stetanov, “The Pan-European Digital Czlluar Motite Radio System-Known as GSM," Mobile Radio Commun, R, Steele, Ed, Ch8, London: Pentech Press 1992