1.

Sand (dep: velocity, ind: conductivity)

1.1 Linear Regression Mean Velocity for sand and Conductivity for Sand

Table shows the linear regression between Mean Velocity for Sand and Conductivity
for Sand. SPSS shows the equation for the fitted line:

Velocity for Sand = .300 – 4.173 Conductivity for Sand

This equation rounds the SPSS parameter estimates to tree decimal places. The fitted
line has an intercept value of .300 and has a slope – 4.173. In short, increase of 1 unit of
Velocity for Sand will decrease in average 4.173 units in Conductivity for Sand.

Table 1 Linear Regression Mean Velocity for Sand and Conductivity for Sand
Number of Observations Read 25
Number of Observations Used 25

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .991 a
.981 .980 .00220
a. Predictors: (Constant), SANDCONDUCTIVITY

ANOVAb
Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression .006 1 .006 1.206E3 .000a
Residual .000 23 .000
Total .006 24
a. Predictors: (Constant), SANDCONDUCTIVITY
b. Dependent Variable: SANDVELOCITYREFLEXW
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) .300 .004 70.118 .000
SANDCONDUCTIVITY -4.173 .120 -.991 -34.727 .000 1.000 1.000
a. Dependent Variable: SANDVELOCITYREFLEXW

To testing whether the model is significant or not, the following hypothesis is conducted,

The linear model for ANOVA show p-value = .000 is last than 0.05, it is significant,
with R2 = .981 and R = .991 it show the positive correlation. The Pr > F value is pvalue for
testing the hypothesis. Compare this pvalue with the significance level for the Conductivity
for Sand data, the value pvalue is .000 is last than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is
rejected, the model is significant. The VIF is 1 so that not have multicollinearity.

Graph 1
 Graph 2

Graph 3

The graph 1 above show the histogram; graph 2 shows the box plot and the scatter
plot in graph 3 show it is R2 linear = .981.
1.2 Logarithmic Regression Mean Velocity for sand and Conductivity for Sand

Table shows the Logarithmic regression between Mean Velocity for Sand and
Conductivity for Sand. SPSS shows the equation for the fitted line:

Velocity for Sand = - .347 - .149 Conductivity for Sand

This equation rounds the SPSS parameter estimates to tree decimal places. The fitted
line has an intercept value of - .347 and has a slope - .149. In short, increase of 1 unit of
Velocity for Sand will decrease in average .149 units in Conductivity for Sand.

Table 2 Logarithmic Regression Mean Velocity for Sand and Conductivity for Sand
Number of Observations Read 25
Number of Observations Used 25

ANOVAb
Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression .006 1 .006 1.974E3 .000a
Residual .000 23 .000
Total .006 24
a. Predictors: (Constant), logSANDCONDUCTIVITY
b. Dependent Variable: SANDVELOCITYREFLEXW

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .994a .988 .988 .00172
a. Predictors: (Constant), logSANDCONDUCTIVITY
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) -.347 .011 -30.867 .000
logSANDCONDUCTIVITY -.149 .003 -.994 -44.426 .000 1.000 1.000
a. Dependent Variable: SANDVELOCITYREFLEXW

To testing whether the model is significant or not, the following hypothesis is conducted,

The Logarithmic model for ANOVA show p-value = .000 is last than 0.05, it is
significant, with R2 = .988 and R = .994 it show the positive correlation. The Pr > F value is
pvalue for testing the hypothesis. Compare this pvalue with the significance level for the
Conductivity for Sand data, the value pvalue is .000 is last than 0.05. Therefore, the null
hypothesis is rejected, the model is significant. The VIF is 1 so that not have
multicollinearity.

Graph 4
Graph 5

Graph 6
 The graph 4 above show the histogram; graph 5 shows the box plot and the scatter
plot in graph 6 show it is R2 Logarithmic = .988.