1.

Sand (dep: soil moisture, ind: permitivity)

1.1 Linear Regression Mean Moisture Content for sand and Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand

Table shows the linear regression between Mean Moisture Content for Sand and
Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand. SPSS shows the equation for the fitted line:

Moisture Content for Sand = 13.484 + 3.827 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand

This equation rounds the SPSS parameter estimates to tree decimal places. The fitted
line has an intercept value of 13.484 and has a slope + 3.827. In short, increase of 1 unit of
Moisture Content for Sand will increase in average 3.827 units in Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand.

Table 1 Linear Regression Mean Moisture Content for Sand and Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand
Number of Observations Read 25
Number of Observations Used 25

ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 44.378 1 44.378 5.723 .026a
Residual 162.840 21 7.754
Total 207.217 22
b. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture
a. Predictors: (Constant), sandpermittivity

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .463a .214 .177 2.784650
a. Predictors: (Constant), sandpermittivity
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients Collinearity Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) 13.484 5.909 2.282 .033
sandpermittivity 3.827 1.600 .463 2.392 .026 1.000 1.000
a. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture

To testing whether the model is significant or not, the following hypothesis is conducted,

After remove outlier last than 2.8 The linear model for ANOVA show p-value = .026
is last than 0.05, it is significant, with R2 = .214 and R = .463 it show the positive correlation.
The Pr > F value is pvalue for testing the hypothesis. Compare this pvalue with the
significance level for the Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand data, the value pvalue
is .026 is last than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected, the model is significant.
The VIF is 1 so that not have multicollinearity.

Graph 1
 Graph 2

Graph 3

The graph 1 above show the histogram; graph 2 shows the box plot and the scatter
plot in graph 3 show it is R2 linear = .214.
1.2 Logarithmic Regression Mean Moisture Content for sand and Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand

Table shows the Logarithmic regression between Mean Moisture Content for Sand
and Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand. SPSS shows the equation for the fitted line:

Moisture Content for Sand = 9.333 + 14.049 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand

This equation rounds the SPSS parameter estimates to tree decimal places. The fitted
line has an intercept value of 9.333 and has a slope + 14.049. In short, increase of 1 unit of
Moisture Content for Sand will increase in average 14.049 units in Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand.

Table 2 Logarithmic Regression Mean Moisture Content for Sand and Relative
Dielectric Permittivity for Sand
Number of Observations Read 25
Number of Observations Used 25

ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 44.930 1 44.930 5.814 .052a
Residual 162.287 21 7.728
Total 207.217 22
b. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture
a. Predictors: (Constant), logsandpermittivity

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .466a .217 .180 2.779923
a. Predictors: (Constant), logsandpermittivity
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients Collinearity Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) 9.333 7.578 1.232 .232
logsandpermittivity 14.049 5.827 .466 2.411 .025 1.000 1.000
a. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture

To testing whether the model is significant or not, the following hypothesis is conducted,

After remove outlier lat than 1.1. The Logarithmic model for ANOVA show p-value =
.025 is more than 0.05, it is not significant, with R2 = .217 and R = .466 it show the positive
correlation. The Pr > F value is pvalue for testing the hypothesis. Compare this pvalue
with the significance level for the Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand data, the value
pvalue is .025 is last than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected, the model is
significant. The VIF is 1 so that not have multicollinearity.

Graph 4
 Graph 5

Graph 6

The graph 4 above show the histogram; graph 5 shows the box plot and the scatter
plot in graph 6 show it is R2 Logarithmic = .326.
1.3 Second order polynomial Regression Mean Moisture Content for sand and Relative
Dielectric Permittivity for Sand

Table shows the Second order polynomial regression between Mean Moisture Content
for Sand and Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand. SPSS shows the equation for the fitted
line:

Moisture Content for Sand = -20.380 + 22.421 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand –
2.527 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand2

This equation rounds the SPSS parameter estimates to tree decimal places. The fitted
line has an intercept value of -20.380, has a slope + 22.421 and slope – 2.527. In short,
increase of 1 unit of Moisture Content for Sand will increase in average 22.421 units in
Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand and will decrease in average 2.527 units in Relative
Dielectric Permittivity for Sand2.

Table 3 Second order polynomial Regression Mean Moisture Content for Sand and
Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand
Number of Observations Read 25
Number of Observations Used 25

ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 47.274 2 23.637 2.956 .075a
Residual 159.943 20 7.997
Total 207.217 22
b. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture
a. Predictors: (Constant), sandpermittivity2, sandpermittivity

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .478 a
.228 .15 2.827924
The independent variable is SANDPERMITTIVITY.
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients Collinearity Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) -20.380 56.589 -.360 .723
sandpermittivity 22.421 30.936 2.711 .725 .477 .003 362.562
sandpermittivity2 -2.527 4.199 -2.251 -.602 .554 .003 362.562
a. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture

To testing whether the model is significant or not, the following hypothesis is conducted,

After remove outlier lat than 7.8. The Second order polynomial model for ANOVA
show p-value = .075 is last than 0.05, it is significant, with R2 = .228 and R = .478 it show the
positive correlation. The Pr > F value is pvalue for testing the hypothesis. Compare this
pvalue with the significance level for the Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand data, the
value pvalue is .477 is more than 0.05 and Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand2 data,
the value pvalue is .554 is more than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is failed to
rejected, the model is not significant. The VIF is 362.562 so that have multicollinearity.

Graph 7
 Graph 8

Graph 9

The graph 7 above show the histogram; graph 8 shows the box plot and the scatter
plot in graph 9 show it is R2 Second order polynomial = .228.
1.4 Third order polynomial Regression Mean Moisture Content for sand and Relative
Dielectric Permittivity for Sand

Table shows the Third order polynomial regression between Mean Moisture Content
for Sand and Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand. SPSS shows the equation for the fitted
line:

Moisture Content for Sand = -13.818 + 15.085 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand +
3.043E2 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand2 - .374 Relative Dielectric Permittivity for
Sand3

This equation rounds the SPSS parameter estimates to tree decimal places. The fitted
line has an intercept value of -13.818, has a slope + 15.085, slope + 3.043E2 and slope - .374.
In short, increase of 1 unit of Moisture Content for Sand will decrease in average 15.085 units
in Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand will increase in average 3.043E2 units in Relative
Dielectric Permittivity for Sand2 and will decrese in average .374 units in Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand3.

Table 4 Third order polynomial Regression Mean Moisture Content for Sand and
Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand
Number of Observations Read 25
Number of Observations Used 25

ANOVAb
Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 48.686 2 24.343 3.071 .069a
Residual 158.31 20 7.927
Total 207.217 22
a. Predictors: (Constant), sandpermittivity3, sandpermittivity
b. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .485a .235 .158 2.815416
a. Predictors: (Constant), sandpermittivity3, sandpermittivity
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients Collinearity Statistics
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) -13.818 37.511 -.368 .716
sandpermittivity 15.085 15.356 1.824 .982 .338 .011 90.120
sandpermittivity3 -.275 .374 -1.369 -.737 .470 .011 90.120
a. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture

Excluded Variablesb
Collinearity Statistics
Partial Minimum
Model Beta In t Sig. Correlation Tolerance VIF Tolerance
sandpermittivity2 3.043E2 a
4.721 .000 .735 4.461E-6 2.242E5 4.461E-6
a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), sandpermittivity3, sandpermittivity
b. Dependent Variable: sandmoisture

To testing whether the model is significant or not, the following hypothesis is conducted,

After remove outlier lat than 21.5. The Third order polynomial model for ANOVA
show p-value = .069 is more than 0.05, it is not significant, with R2 = .235 and R = .485 it
show the positive correlation. The Pr > F value is pvalue for testing the hypothesis.
Compare this pvalue with the significance level for the Relative Dielectric Permittivity for
Sand data, the value pvalue is .338 is more than 0.05, Relative Dielectric Permittivity for
Sand2 data, the value pvalue is .735 is more than 0.05. and Relative Dielectric Permittivity
for Sand3 data, the value pvalue is .470 is more than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is
failed to rejected, the model is not significant. The VIF is 90.120 Relative Dielectric
Permittivity for Sand and Relative Dielectric Permittivity for Sand3 and The VIF Relative
Dielectric Permittivity for Sand2 is 2.242E5 so that have multicollinearity.
Graph 10

Graph 11
 Graph 12

The graph 10 above show the histogram; graph 11 shows the box plot and the scatter
plot in graph 12 show it is R2 Third order polynomial = .235.