The document discusses theories of learning and considers which are most and least effective.
[1] The theory of multiple intelligences is considered the most effective as it recognizes students learn in different ways suited to their strengths. This allows them to apply knowledge in a way that maximizes their learning potential.
[2] Cognitivism is considered the least effective as it focuses only on internal mental processes and neglects other factors influencing learning. It also discourages deep understanding in favor of cramming information, which is ineffective for education.
The document discusses theories of learning and considers which are most and least effective.
[1] The theory of multiple intelligences is considered the most effective as it recognizes students learn in different ways suited to their strengths. This allows them to apply knowledge in a way that maximizes their learning potential.
[2] Cognitivism is considered the least effective as it focuses only on internal mental processes and neglects other factors influencing learning. It also discourages deep understanding in favor of cramming information, which is ineffective for education.
The document discusses theories of learning and considers which are most and least effective.
[1] The theory of multiple intelligences is considered the most effective as it recognizes students learn in different ways suited to their strengths. This allows them to apply knowledge in a way that maximizes their learning potential.
[2] Cognitivism is considered the least effective as it focuses only on internal mental processes and neglects other factors influencing learning. It also discourages deep understanding in favor of cramming information, which is ineffective for education.
Prof-Ed Block B Facilitating Learning Leave-on Activity
1. Which among the Theories of Learning do you consider as the MOST
effective and why?
I consider the theory of multiple intelligences to be the most
effective in teaching and learning processes. The hypothesis of multiple intelligences has many uses in the classroom. Students apply what they learn in class in a way that best suits their dominant intelligence and preferred learning style. The learning processes of students are improved when dominating intelligences and learning styles are combined. Such research findings results demonstrated that using multiple intelligences in teaching activities might greatly improve students’ academic performance, encourage their desire to learn, improve their reading comprehension, and even improve their capacity for cooperating in group learning. Multiple intelligence implies that each student has unique strengths and shortcomings in terms of intelligence. These cognitive domains, often known as learning styles, determine how readily or difficulty a student may learn using a certain teaching method. In a classroom, there may be more than one type of learning. Learning is impossible without intelligence. In other words, intelligence is the basis of learning. The effectiveness of learning is conditioned by the degree of intelligence. It is an accepted fact that students with high intelligence are easier to teach or to direct and guide than students with low intelligence. 2. Which among the Theories of Learning do you consider as the LEAST effective and why?
I will consider the Cognitivism theory as the least effective theory
in teaching and learning processes. It is because of the fact that cognitive learning discourages cramming of information, which is very ineffective in education. Having a deep understanding of a subject improves the ability of the student to relate new knowledge with previous experiences or information. The cognitive approach focuses on studying how internal mental processes can be carefully and objectively studied. This approach is reductionist because it focuses only on cognitions and neglects other factors that might contribute to behavior. The main disadvantage of the cognitive theory is that it refers to cognitive processes that we cannot directly observe. It relies heavily on inference. Therefore, this approach is reductionist as it explains behavior as simply the result of five cognitive processes (thought, attention, memory, perception, and language) and disregards other factors. Cognitivism has a key advantage of practical and useful applications, but a key disadvantage of not being able to observe the supposed causes of behavior.