Boston Atalamta Houston Capacity TSO Actual Supply

ST Luis 30000 0 0 30,000 30000 30000

Detroit 5.457E-12 0 0 10,000 5.457E-12 0

TOLEDO 0 0 0 20,000 0 0

Denver 1.091E-11 0 0 30,000 1.091E-11 0

Kansas City 0 20000 20000 40,000 40000 40000

Demand 30,000 20,000 20,000

TSI 30000 20000 20000

Total Cost
Open/Close Fixed Cost Boston Atalamta Houston

1 ST Louis 8 4 3

0 175,000 Detroit 5 2 3

0 300,000 TOLEDO 4 3 4

0 375,000 Denver 9 7 5

1 500,000 Kansas City 10 4 2

860000
 Plant

Workforce JacksonvillNew OrleaGalvaston

Supplier Gdansk 1725 1800 2345 2700

Hamsberg 1825 1730 1945 2320

Lisbon 2060 2175 2050 2475

Distribution

Dallas Kansas CitFront Royal

Plant Norfolk 825 545 320

Jacksonvill 750 675 450

New Orlea 325 605 690

Galvaston 270 510 1050

Customers

Tucon Denver Pittsbergh Nashille Cleveland

DistributionDallas 450 830 565 420 960

Kansas Cit 880 520 450 380 660

Front Roya 1350 390 1200 450 310

Demand 170 240 140 155 120

 Total Cost 823650

TSI-TSO

Dallas 0

Kansas Cit 0

Front Roya 0
 Plant

Workforce Jacksonville New OrleaGalvaston Container

Supplier Gdansk 0 0 0 0 125

Hamsberg 0 0 0 0 210

Lisbon 0 0 0 0 165

TSI 0 0 0 0

Demand 170 110 120 100

Distribution

Dallas Kansas City Front RoyaContainer Capacity TSO

Plant Norfolk 0 0 705 85 705

Jacksonville 0 0 0 110 0

New Orleans 0 0 0 100 0

Galvaston 0 0 0 130 0

TSI 0 0 705

Customers

Tucon Denver Pittsbergh Nashille Cleveland

Distribution Dallas 0 0 0 0 0

Kansas City 0 0 0 0 0

Front Royal 170 240 140 155 120

TSI 170 240 140 155 120

Demand 170 240 140 155 120

Here we cannot achieve the optimum soluntion because the demand is higher than supply,
TSO

TSO

705
and is higher than supply,