Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION -
Tata Nano is a compact vehicle that was produced and showcased by Indian automaker
Tata Motors, principally in India, as a modest back-engine hatchback expected to speak to
current riders of bikes and bikes — with a dispatch cost of Rs 1,00,000 or $2500. Delays
during the production line migration from Singur to Sanand, early cases of the Nano bursting
into flames, the impression of the vehicle being perilous, and compromise in quality due to
cost slicing are some of factors behind Tata's failure to attract Indians.
Here we present the case study of tata motors – nano case and find out why did Tata Nano
Failed and never gained traction despite being termed as the 'people's car'.
Tata Motors anticipated creation of 250,000 every year at dispatch. This didn't happen. Only
7591 were sold for the model year 2016-17. In 2017, Tata Motors said assembling would
proceed because of Tata's passionate promise to the project. In 2018, Cyrus Mistry, previous
Chairman of the Tata Group, called the Tata Nano a venture in progress with China, with a
generation overhaul scheduled in May 2018.
MANUFACTURING PROCESS
Ratan Tata stayed faithful to his obligation and the Indian market saw Nano set
on the streets in the long stretch of July 2009. At the start, the deals for the
vehicle were high. It then began to decay on every month. There are a few
reasons of failure which justify Tata Nano's downfall,
Failure in marketing the vehicle was the main reason behind Tata Nano's
Failure to attract customers.
TATA nano promotes itself as the least expensive vehicle.
No one needs to drive the least expensive vehicle.
Purchasing a vehicle is identified with economic well-being and
distinction in the public arena.
"Cheap" and "lakh Takia" used in Tata Nano's advertising for
advancement and showcasing all over India disturbed its image.
The engine was an issue.
There was a buzz in the universal media, "What if Nano becomes
successful? It would mean an end to the second-hand car market."
PROBLEMS WITH THE MANUFACTURING OF THE CAR -
Awful picture of the shoddy vehicle.
Several cars caught fire. Thus, in spite of its low cost, people refrained
from buying it.
Media channels covering the news related to Tata Nano underestimated
the vehicle. In any case, they were correct.
The car was not fit for sloping territories.
The motor used to make a great deal of clamour, and individuals even
compared it with an auto.
Insides were dull with inadequate leg space.
The whole assemblage of Nano was light and prone to damage on even
the slightest of knocks.
OTHER REASONS/FACTORS -
Tata Nano got around 200,000 appointments at first. This made
Tata Motors complacent, and it didn't bother about new
advertising strategies. New publicity procedures were essential
to keep the enthusiasm of the individuals unblemished. But it
wasn't done. When the main flame episode was accounted for,
the ad system then just looked responsive and upgraded rather
than focusing on negative attention.
Nano was viewed as an attraction for individuals who never
thought of purchasing a vehicle. It was focused on engine cycle
riders, recycled vehicle proprietors, and different families in the
lower white-collar class gathering. This prompted some degree
of opposition. According to the intended interest group, the
media and the general public acknowledged Tata Nano as a poor
man's vehicle.
Ratan Tata in his previous question and answer sessions
referenced that he wanted to position Tata Nano as a
'reasonable, all climate family vehicle".
At the point when Nano later raised its cost to conquer the
negatives of the principal model, the cost turned out to be a lot
higher. The top-end Model of Tata Nano (2014) was cited at an
on-street cost of around Rs.2.6 lakhs in Bangalore. This sort of
evaluation with the equivalent Nano model which the poor man
likewise claimed, confounded the clients.
KEY TAKEWAYS -
1. The 'Solution' lesson - The best of brands know they are in the business of
solutions not products. To get this right, businesses have to abandon the
engineering mindset, one that's focused on building products, not solutions.
'Frugal engineering' once described as the powering force behind the Nano
miracle stands exposed today. Frugal cuts back on spending, thus cutting back
on building a solution. All frugal engineering does is build products that work.
That is just the default limited job done, and that's not good enough to step into
solution territory. To me, the Tata Nano was more a 'product' than a 'solution'.
You see, buyers don't give a whit to products, they seek after solutions.
2. The 'Value' lesson - An extension to the solution lesson, value is about what
consumers seek and desire. Understanding value in its entirety requires
businesses step outside the limiting confines of viewing value only as utility.
You see, value is way beyond mere utility. Value encompasses elements that are
sociological and psychogenic in nature. Meaning, consumption has social and
psychological contexts to it. A car is as much about a 'place in society's it is
about transportation. Again, a car is as much about persona exhibitions as it is
about mobility. Stepping into such zones of value is seeing value in its entirety.
Unfortunately for the Tata Nano, its delivery of value was merely utilitarian.
3. The 'Competition' lesson - An assessment of value by consumers is never an
'absolute' one. In fact, value assessments are arrived at in a 'relative' fashion, in
a competitive marketplace. No buyer considers a car brand for purchase without
pitching it against other brands. When such comparisons happen, what may
seem like value to the seller, may not be the 'best' value to the buyer from
among the choices he/she has. The Tata Nano may have scored on the price
parameter vis-a-vis competing brands, but on every other element of value it
under-performed. Buyers thus found better propositions in budget cars, and they
were willing to pay a higher price
4. The 'Positioning' Lesson - Many times marketers tend to believe positioning
is only about marketing communication. Dead wrong. Positioning is about
occupying a distinct space in the minds of consumers using every possible
marketing stimuli available. In theory, that means all marketing mix variables.
The Tata Nano tried to advertise its way into positioning itself. It just didn't
work. First, the brand ran Ads to appeal to families, and when it didn't do the
job, it used Masaba Gupta and the 'Twist' avatar to appeal to Indian youth.
Again, it failed. What happened was that every other stimuli, including the
product itself worked at crossroads to what the Ads were trying to portray.
Truth be told, the unappealing looks of the product, to its lack of status value
negated everything advertising was trying to pitch. Such a pity all that
advertising effort was wasted dollars.