Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Florentin Smarandache
University of New Mexico, USA
Published in:
Rajesh Singh, Pankaj Chauhan, Nirmala Sawan, Florentin Smarandache (Editors)
AUXILIARY INFORMATION AND A PRIORI VALUES IN CONSTRUCTION
OF IMPROVED ESTIMATORS
Renaissance High Press, Ann Arbor, USA, 2007
(ISBN-10): 1-59973-046-4
(ISBN-13): 978-1-59973-046-2
pp. 65 - 73
Abstract
variable under study, which make use of known value of certain population parameter(s),
is proposed. Some well known estimators have been shown as particular member of this
family. It has been shown that the suggested estimator is better than the usual unbiased
estimator, Isaki’s (1983) ratio estimator, Upadhyaya and Singh’s (1999) estimator and
Kadilar and Cingi (2006). An empirical study is carried out to illustrate the performance
1. Introduction
researchers are interested in the variation of their produce or yields (Ahmed et.al. (2003)).
sample without replacement (SRSWOR) of size n is drawn. Further let y and x denote the
65
(yi − Y )2 denotes respectively the unknown
N
1 n
∑ ∑
1
Let Y = yi and S2y =
N i =1 N − 1 i =1
population mean and population variance of the study character y. Assume that
population size N is very large so that the finite population correction term is ignored. It
is established fact that in most of the survey situations, auxiliary information is available
(or may be made to be available diverting some of the resources) in one form or the other.
If used intelligibly, this information may yield estimators better than those in which no
Assume that a simple random sample of size n is drawn without replacement. The
1 n
s 2y = ∑
n − 1 i =1
(y i − y )2 (1.1)
∑y
1
where y = i is the sample mean of y.
n i =1
⎛ s 2y ⎞
t1 = ⎜ 2 ⎟S2x (1.2)
⎜ sx ⎟
⎝ ⎠
1 n
where s 2x = ∑
n − 1 i =1
(x i − x )2 is an unbiased estimator of S2x .
66
Several authors have used prior value of certain population parameter(s) to find
more precise estimates. The use of prior value of coefficient of kurtosis in estimating the
population variance of study character y was first made by Singh et. al. (1973). Kadilar
and Cingi (2006) proposed modified ratio estimators for the population variance using
variation.
for estimating the population variance S2y . The expressions of bias and mean-squared
error (MSE), up to the first order of approximation, have been obtained. Some well
t = s 2y
(aS 2
x −b ) (2.1)
[α (as 2x − b) + (1 − α )(aS 2x − b)]
where (a ≠ 0), b are either real numbers or the function of the known parameters of the
(β 2 ( x )) .
The following scheme presents some of the important known estimators of the
67
Table 2.1 : Some members of the proposed family of the estimators ‘t’
Estimator Values of
α a b
t 0 = s 2y 0 0 0
s 2y 1 1 0
t1 = S2x Isaki (1983)
s 2x
estimator
s 2y 1 1 Cx
t2 = [S2x − C x ] Kadilar
s 2x − Cx
s 2y 1 1 β2 (x)
t3 = [S2x − β 2 ( x )]
s 2x − β 2 ( x )
s 2y 1 β2 (x) Cx
t4 = [S2xβ 2 ( x ) − C x ]
s 2xβ 2 ( x ) − C x
s 2y 1 Cx β2 (x)
t5 = [S2x C x − β 2 ( x )]
s 2x C x − β2 (x)
s 2y 1 1 - β2 ( x )
t6 = [S 2x + β 2 ( x )]
s 2x + β 2 ( x )
The MSE of proposed estimator ‘t’ can be found by using the firs degree approximation
MSE( t ) ≅ d ∑ d ′ (2.2)
68
where
∂h (a , b) ∂h (a , b)
h= [ ]
∂a S2y ,S2x ∂b S2y ,S2x
⎡ V(s 2y ) Cov(s 2y , s 2x )⎤
∑=⎢ 2 2 ⎥.
⎢⎣Cov(s x , s y ) V(s 2x ) ⎥⎦
Here h(a,b) = h( s 2y , s 2x ) = t. According to this definition, we obtain ‘d’ for the proposed
estimator, t, as follows:
αaS 2y
d= [1 - ]
aS 2x + b
⎛ aS 2y ⎞ ⎛ αaS 2y ⎞
MSE ( t ) ≅ V(s 2y ) − 2α⎜ 2 ⎟Cov(s 2 , s 2 ) + ⎜ ⎟V(s 2 ) (2.3)
⎜ aS x − b ⎟ y x
⎜ aS 2x − b ⎟ x
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
where
V(s 2y ) = λS4y [β 2 ( y) − 1] ⎫
⎪⎪
V(s 2x ) = λS4y [β 2 ( x ) − 1] ⎬ (2.4)
⎪
Cov(s 2y , s 2x ) = λS2yS2x (h − 1)⎪⎭
1 μ 40 μ 04 μ 22
where λ = , β 2 ( y) = , β2 (x ) = , h= ,
n μ 220 μ 02
2
μ 20μ 02
∑ (y
1
μ rs = i − Y ) r ( x i − X )s , (r, s) being non negative integers.
N i =1
{
MSE ( t ) ≅ λS4y β 2 ( y) − 1 − 2αθ( h − 1) + α 2θ 2 (β 2 ( x ) − 1) } (2.5)
aS 2x
where θ = .
aS 2x − b
69
{ }
MSE ( t i ) ≅ λS4y β 2 ( y) − 1 − 2αθi (h − 1) + α 2 θi2 (β 2 ( x ) − 1) , i = 2,3,4,5 ,6 (2.6)
where
S2x S2x
θ2 = , θ3 = ,
S2x − C x S2x − β 2 ( x )
S 2x β 2 ( x ) S 2x C x S 2x
θ4 = , θ5 = , θ6 = .
S 2x β 2 ( x ) − C x S 2x C x − β 2 ( x ) S 2x + β 2 ( x )
C
α= = α opt (2.7)
θ
(h − 1)
where C = .
{β2 (x ) − 1}
3. Efficiency comparisons
provided C ≠ θi .
70
Thus it follows from (3.3) and (3.4) that the suggested estimator under ‘optimum’
condition is (i) always better then s 2y , (ii) better than Isaki’s (1983) estimator t1 except
when C = 1 in which both are equally efficient, and (iii) Kadilar and Cingi (2006)
equally efficient.
4. Empirical study
Table 4.1: Data statistics of the population for the simple random sampling
The percent relative efficiencies of the estimators s 2y , t i (i = 2,3,4,5,6) and min .MSE ( t )
with respect to s 2y have been computed and presented in Table 4.2 below.
71
Table 4.2: Relative efficiencies (%) of s 2y , t i (i = 2,3,4,5,6) and min .MSE ( t ) with respect
to s 2y .
t 0 = s 2y 100
t1 201.6564
t2 201.6582
t3 201.6782
t4 201.6565
t5 201.6672
t6 201.6347
5. Conclusion
infer that the proposed estimator ‘t’ under optimum condition performs better than usual
estimator s 2y , Isaki’s (1983) estimator t1, Kadilar and Cingi’s (2006) estimators (t2, t3, t4,
References
Ahmed, M.S., Dayyeh, W.A. and Hurairah, A.A.O. (2003): Some estimators for finite
population variance under two-phase sampling. Statistics in Transition, 6, 1,
143-150.
72
Isaki, C.T. (1983): Variance estimation using auxiliary information. Jour. Amer. Stat.
Kadilar, C. and Cingi, H. (2006): Ratio estimators for the population variance in simple
Singh, J., Pandey, B.N. and Hirano, K. (1973): On the utilization of a known coefficient
25, 51-55.
Upadhyaya, L.N. and Singh, H. P. (1999): An estimator for population variance that
73